case study williams machine tool company

Project management at Williams Company

Not what you're looking for?

Case Study For 85 years, the Williams Machine Tool Company had provided quality products to its clients, becoming the third largest U.S.-based machine tool company by 1990. The company was highly profitable and had an extremely low employee turnover rate. Pay and benefits were excellent. Between 1980 and 1990, the company's profits soared to record levels. The company's success was due to one product line of standard manufacturing machine tools. Williams spent most of its time and effort looking for ways to improve its bread-and-butter product line rather than to develop new products. The product line was so successful that companies were willing to modify their production lines around these machine tools rather than asking Williams for major modifications to the machine tools. By 1990, Williams Company was extremely complacent, expecting this phenomenal success with one product line to continue for 20 to 25 more years. The recession of the early 1990s forced management to realign their thinking. Cutbacks in production had decreased the demand for the standard machine tools. More and more customers were asking for either major modifications to the standard machine tools or a completely new product design. The marketplace was changing and senior management recognized that a new strategic focus was necessary. However, lower-level management and the work force, especially engineering, were strongly resisting a change. The employees, many of them with over 20 years of employment at Williams Company, refused to recognize the need for this change in the belief that the glory days of the past would return at the end of the recession. By 1995, the recession had been over for at least two years yet Williams Company had no new product lines. Revenue was down, sales for the standard product (with and without modifications) were decreasing, and the employees were still resisting change. Layoffs were imminent. In 1996, the company was sold to Crock Engineering. Crock had an experienced machine tool division of its own and understood the machine tool business. Williams Company was allowed to operate as a separate entity from 1995 to 1996. By 1996, red ink had appeared on the Williams Company balance sheet. Crock replaced all of the Williams senior managers with its own personnel. Crock then announced to all employees that Williams would become a specialty machine tool manufacturer and that the "good old days" would never return. Customer demand for specialty products had increased threefold in just the last twelve months alone. Crock made it clear that employees who would not support this new direction would be replaced. The new senior management at Williams Company recognized that 85 years of traditional management had come to an end for a company now committed to specialty products. The company culture was about to change, spearheaded by project management, concurrent engineering, and total quality management. Senior management's commitment to product management was apparent by the time and money spent in educating the employees. Unfortunately, the seasoned 20-year-plus veterans still would not support the new culture. Recognizing the problems, management provided continuous and visible support for project management in addition to hiring a project management consultant to work with the people. The consultant worked with Williams from 1996 to 2001. From 1996 to 2001, the Williams Division of Crock Engineering experienced losses in 24 consecutive quarters. The quarter ending March 31, 2002, was the first profitable quarter in over six years. Much of the credit was given to the performance and maturity of the project management system. In May 2002, the Williams Division was sold. More than 80% of the employees lost their jobs when the company was relocated over 1,500 miles away. Case Study Questions: 1. Could project management have been used for those projects involving modifications to the standard machine tool line? Explain your answer. 2. How should you handle experienced employees who live in the past and refuse to accept project management? 3. Is project management the real reason why the company was sold and employees lost their jobs? 4. Should Crock Engineering has held on to the Williams Company? If so, how? 5. How should project management be introduced in companies such as Williams Machine Tool to reduce resistance to change by employees?

Purchase this Solution

Solution summary.

This solution discusses a case study of Williams company with focus on project management.

Solution Preview

Case Study For 85 years, the Williams Machine Tool Company had provided quality products to its clients, becoming the third largest U.S.-based machine tool company by 1990. The company was highly profitable and had an extremely low employee turnover rate. Pay and benefits were excellent. Between 1980 and 1990, the company's profits soared to record levels. The company's success was due to one product line of standard manufacturing machine tools. Williams spent most of its time and effort looking for ways to improve its bread-and-butter product line rather than to develop new products. The product line was so successful that companies were willing to modify their production lines around these machine tools rather than asking Williams for major modifications to the machine tools. By 1990, Williams Company was extremely complacent, expecting this phenomenal success with one product line to continue for 20 to 25 more years. The recession of the early 1990s forced management to realign their thinking. Cutbacks in production had decreased the demand for the standard machine tools. More and more customers were asking for either major modifications to the standard machine tools or a completely new product design. The marketplace was changing and senior management recognized that a new strategic focus was necessary. However, lower-level management and the work force, especially engineering, ...

Free BrainMass Quizzes

Production and cost theory.

Understanding production and cost phenomena will permit firms to make wise decisions concerning output volume.

Managing the Older Worker

This quiz will let you know some of the basics of dealing with older workers. This is increasingly important for managers and human resource workers as many countries are facing an increase in older people in the workforce

Learning Lean

This quiz will help you understand the basic concepts of Lean.

MS Word 2010-Tricky Features

These questions are based on features of the previous word versions that were easy to figure out, but now seem more hidden to me.

Writing Business Plans

This quiz will test your understanding of how to write good business plans, the usual components of a good plan, purposes, terms, and writing style tips.

Related BrainMass Solutions

Williams-Sonoma case analysis

The change framework that is relevant to successful change management at Williams -Sonoma is the Lewin's unfreeze-change-refreeze model.

As a Project Manager where would you place greater emphasis?

., Williams , D., Davis, R., & Cothren, C. (2010). Principles of Computer Security: CompTIA Security+™ and Beyond (2nd Ed.). San Francisco, CA: McGraw-Hill Company . Schwalbe, K. (2008). Information Technology Project Management (5th ed.).

Sherwin-Williams Company

318455 The Sherwin Williams Company The Sherwin- Williams Company (Sherwin- Williams ; ticker symbol SHW) was founded in 1866.

Case Study: Williams-Sonoma

I would project Williams -Sonoma will continue to grow and be successful in the next five years based on its' strategy. 2. If you were the CEO of William-Sonoma, what strategies would you recommend, and why?

interpretations of Ethical Behaviour

References: The Williams Institute for Ethics Management , (2003). Ethics Awareness Inventory.

Financial Statements, ROI, Varainaces & Manufacturing

Makinen Division of the Palo Company has an opportunity to invest in a new project . The project will yield an incremental operating income of $73,350 on average invested assets of $900,000.

Sunflower by Williams

Williams should know that the potential use of information technology can help standardize prices and purchases, as well as help the top management closely monitor the prices and purchasing practices at the regions.

Special Order: Williams Company

Currently, the company is operating at about 70 percent capacity and is earning a satisfactory return on investment. Glasgow Industries Ltd. of Scotland has approached management with an offer to buy 120,000 units of a pressure valve.

Accounting: Overhead application

The Williams and Chandler projects were completed in May; The Nguyen project was not completed by the end of the month. No other jobs were in process during May.

Ashkan Ghasemi

Senior Project Manager

Case Study – WILLIAMS MACHINE TOOL COMPANY

For 75 years, the Williams Machine Tool Company had provided quality products to its clients, becoming the third largest U.S.-based machine tool company by 1980. The company was highly profitable and had an extremely low employee turnover rate. Pay and benefits were excellent. Between 1970 and 1980, the company’s profits soared to record levels. The company’s success was due to one product line of standard manufacturing machine tools. Williams spent most of its time and effort looking for ways to improve its bread-and-butter product line rather than to develop new products. The product line was so successful that companies were willing to modify their production lines around these machine tools rather than asking Williams for major modifications to the machine tools. By 1980, Williams Company was extremely complacent, expecting this phenomenal success with one product line to continue for 20 to 25 more years. The recession of 1979–1983 forced management to realign their thinking. Cutbacks in production had decreased the demand for the standard machine tools. More and more customers were asking for either major modifications to the standard machine tools or a completely new product design. The marketplace was changing and senior management recognized that a new strategic focus was necessary. However, lower-level management and the work force, especially engineering, were strongly resisting a change. The employees, many of them with over 20 years of employment at Williams Company, refused to recognize the need for this change in the belief that the glory days of yore would return at the end of the recession. By 1985, the recession had been over for at least two years yet Williams Company had no new product lines. Revenue was down, sales for the standard product (with and without modifications) were decreasing, and the employees were still resisting change. Layoffs were imminent. In 1986, the company was sold to Crock Engineering. Crock had an experienced machine tool division of its own and understood the machine tool business. Williams Company was allowed to operate as a separate entity from 1985 to 1986. By 1986, red ink had appeared on the Williams Company balance sheet. Crock replaced all of the Williams senior managers with its own personnel. Crock then announced to all employees that Williams would become a specialty machine tool manufacturer and that the “good old days” would never return. Customer demand for specialty products had increased threefold in just the last twelve months alone. Crock made it clear that employees who would not support this new direction would be replaced.

The new senior management at Williams Company recognized that 85 years of traditional management had come to an end for a company now committed to specialty products. The company culture was about to change, spearheaded by project management, concurrent engineering, and total quality management. Senior management’s commitment to product management was apparent by the time and money spent in educating the employees. Unfortunately, the seasoned 20-year-plus veterans still would not support the new culture. Recognizing the problems, management provided continuous and visible support for project management in addition to hiring a project management consultant to work with the people. The consultant worked with Williams from 1986 to 1991. From 1986 to 1991, the Williams Division of Crock Engineering experienced losses in 24 consecutive quarters. The quarter ending March 31, 1992, was the first profitable quarter in over six years. Much of the credit was given to the performance and maturity of the project management system. In May 1992, the Williams Division was sold. More than 80% of the employees lost their jobs when the company was relocated over 1,500 miles away.

Source : Project management A system approach to planning, scheduling and controlling [EIGHTH EDITION] By HAROLD KERZNER , Ph.D.

All About Project Management

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Provide details on what you need help with along with a budget and time limit. Questions are posted anonymously and can be made 100% private.

Studypool matches you to the best tutor to help you with your question. Our tutors are highly qualified and vetted.

Your matched tutor provides personalized help according to your question details. Payment is made only after you have completed your 1-on-1 session and are satisfied with your session.

Williams Machine Tool Company case study

User Generated

Business Finance

Colorado State University: Global Campus

Description

Based on your review and analysis of the “Williams Machine Tool Company” case study (Kerzner, 2017, pp. 37-38), address the following discussion topic key elements: (CASE STUDY ATTACHED)

First, describe the subject organization’s resultant culture in context of its project management environment.

Then address one of the two questions at the end of the case study.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Explanation & Answer

Attached. Running head: ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE Organizational culture Student’s name Institution 1 ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE 2 Organizational culture refers to the values, beliefs and attitudes shared by employees in a company. The shared beliefs, values and attitudes have ...

24/7 Homework Help

Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic  math  to advanced rocket science !

Similar Content

Related tags.

math business and finance business and finance Total Rewards Package information-gathering tools communication case study website design Assessment Criteria zoning plan project management standard deviation

by Saul Bellow

The Power of Habit - Why We Do What We Do in Life and Business

by Charles Duhigg

The Turn of the Screw

by Henry James

The Sixth Extinction An Unnatural History

by Elizabeth Kolbert

A Passage to India

by E. M. Forster

The Outsiders

by S.E. Hinton

The Calcutta Chromosome

by Amitav Ghosh

by Ayn Rand

working on a homework question?

Studypool is powered by Microtutoring TM

Copyright © 2024. Studypool Inc.

Studypool is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university.

Ongoing Conversations

Access over 20 million homework documents through the notebank

Get on-demand Q&A homework help from verified tutors

Read 1000s of rich book guides covering popular titles

Sign up with Google

Sign up with Facebook

Already have an account? Login

Login with Google

Login with Facebook

Don't have an account? Sign Up

• Williams Machine & Tool Home
• Williams Machine & Tool Services & Capabilities
• Contact Williams
• About Williams Machine & Tool

Williams Machine & Tool Company, Inc.

Williams Machine & Tool Co., Inc. was started by Dennis Williams in 1979 in the family garage. In July 1981 the business was incorporated as Williams Machine & Tool Co., Inc. Since then, the company has expanded it's services and capabilities greatly and has moved from the family garage to its current 42,475 sq. ft. facility with more than 50 employees.

Today, Williams Machine maintains a family feeling with son's overseeing the production side of the operation. Son, Kelly oversees the machining portion, and Brian on the Heat Treat. Daughter, Denise Titus manages the office and finances.

Williams Machine & Tool Co., Inc. serves customers large and small across the country and around the world including: Eaton Hydraulics , Parker Hannifin , Sauer Danfoss and Sweetheart Cup . Williams has experience in industries such as hydraulic (internal components); agriculture; construction, consumer goods among many others.

Please contact us or visit our services and capabilities page to learn more.

© 2009-2010 Williams Machine & Tool Company, Inc. | Home | Services & Capabilities | Contact Us | About Us

Website design by blue space creative, Inc.