difference between nationalism and patriotism essay brainly

Nationalism vs Patriotism – Differences and Similarities

Chris Drew (PhD)

Dr. Chris Drew is the founder of the Helpful Professor. He holds a PhD in education and has published over 20 articles in scholarly journals. He is the former editor of the Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. [Image Descriptor: Photo of Chris]

Learn about our Editorial Process

The key difference between nationalism and patriotism is that nationalism is the belief in an exclusionary and insular nation-state, while patriotism is the non-exclusionary love of your own nation.

Here is a breakdown of the differences:

Nationalism is a belief that your nation sits that the top of a hierarchy of nations. You believe your nation’s interests are is inherently more important than those of any other country in the world.
Patriotism , on the other hand, is simply the love of your country and culture. Patriots know that you can love your own nation without thinking it’s objectively better than anyone else’s.

While nationalism and patriotism both represent love of country, patriotism is seen as a positive form of self-expression whereas nationalism is seen as an exclusionary act and assertion of power.

Table of Differences: Nationalism vs Patriotism

Nationalism	Patriotism
Nationalists often believe in a hierarchy of nations, with the belief that their own nation should sit on top.	Patriots’ love of their nation does not mean that they think it is objectively superior to any other nation.
Nationalism asserts the objective supremacy or infallibility of a particular nation-state.	Patriotism is a subjective love of a country and the wish for it to do well.
Nationalism often leads to prejudice against non-native-born people who are a threat to the nation’s traditions.	Patriots love their nation’s culture and identity but do not believe it’s better than the culture of immigrants or foreigners.
Nationalism is intolerant of difference and insists on .	Patriotism generally embraces tolerance and the co-mingling of cultures within a nation-state.
Nationalists in government are reluctant to engage in global cooperation because they see geopolitics as a zero-sum battle of nations.	Patriots will engage in global cooperation because they believe cooperation, trade treaties, and the global spread of ideas can benefit everyone.
Nationalists often embrace an aggressive military posture with the idea that this will deter competitor nations and can help to claim territory if another nation-state is seen as weak.	Patriots believe in a strong defensive military force but do not engage in wars of aggression.

What is Nationalism?

Nationalism is an ideological and political movement that promotes the idea of a particular nation as an inherently superior or infallible entity.

The concept of nationalism has also been used to promote the idea of a unified people or culture, and it has sometimes been used to promote xenophobic or imperialist attitudes.

There are at least 14 types of nationalism that sit along a spectrum.

On the softer end of the spectrum, versions of nationalism such as civic nationalism overlap significantly with patriotism. For example, civic and liberal nationalists believe in the rule of law , multiculturalism, and democracy (and see these values as central reasons why their country is ‘great’).

On the other end of the spectrum, ethnonationalism and expansionist nationalism can lead to ethnic cleansing and world wars.

What is Patriotism?

Patriotism is feeling proud of and loyal to one’s country. It can stem from having a soft spot for your culture and neighbors or appreciation of everything the country gave you as you were growing up.

Patriotism can manifest in many ways, including:

Standing for election to represent your nation
Supporting your country’s football team
Playing in your country’s football team
Celebrating national holidays
Showing pride in your national identity
Fighting for your country in the military
Working to make your country a better place

While the above actions can also be the actions of nationalists, patriots do these things only because they love their country and want the best for it and not because they see their country as being in a contest with other countries to be the objectively “best” group of people in the world.

Nationalism vs Supranationalism

Supranationalism is a term related to nationalism, but it is actually anti- nationalistic. Supranationalism refers to the idea of multiple nations coming together to form a higher authority, such as a supranational organization or government. Nationalism, as we have seen, prioritizes the opposite: nationalism is against ceding sovereignty. While nationalists emphasize national culture, identity, and independence, spranationalists emphasize cooperation, interdependence, and a shared cross-border identity.

Patriotism and nationalism are two sides of the same coin. While both involve love of your country, patriots see their love of their country as a subjective feeling while nationalists think that their country is objectively the greatest nation on earth.

While patriotism is generally seen as a positive trait representing pride in your heritage, nationalism tends to be seen as more extreme. Nationalism has led to significant harm, discrimination, prejudice, and war.

Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 19 Top Cognitive Psychology Theories (Explained)
Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 119 Bloom’s Taxonomy Examples
Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ All 6 Levels of Understanding (on Bloom’s Taxonomy)
Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd/ 15 Self-Actualization Examples (Maslow's Hierarchy)

What Is Patriotism? Definition, Examples, Pros and Cons

Key Concepts
Major Sociologists
News & Issues
Research, Samples, and Statistics
Recommended Reading
Archaeology
B.S., Texas A&M University

Simply stated, patriotism is the feeling of love for one’s country. Demonstrating patriotism—being “patriotic”—is one of the necessities of being the stereotypical “ good citizen .” However, patriotism, like many well-intentioned things, can be harmful when taken to an extreme .

Key Takeaways

Patriotism is the feeling and expression of love for one’s home country, along with a feeling of unity with those who share those feelings
Though it shares patriotism’s love of country, nationalism is the belief that one’s home county is superior to all others
While considered a necessary attribute of good citizenship, when patriotism becomes politically mandatory, it can cross a line

Patriotism Definition

Along with love, patriotism is the feeling of pride, devotion, and attachment to a homeland, as well as a feeling of attachment to other patriotic citizens. The feelings of attachment may be further bound up in factors like race or ethnicity , culture, religious beliefs, or history.

Historic Perspective

Patriotism originated some 2,000 years before the rise of nationalism in the 19th century. Greek and especially Roman antiquity provide the roots for a philosophy of political patriotism that conceives of loyalty to the “patria,”—the power that the male head of a family exercised over his children—like loyalty to a political conception of the republic. It is associated with the love of law and common liberty, the search for the common good , and the duty to behave justly toward one’s country. The Roman meaning of patria is repeated in the context of the Italian city-states of the 15th century, such as Naples and Venice, as representing the common liberty of the city, which can only be safeguarded by the citizens’ civic spirit.

To Renaissance period Italian diplomat, author, philosopher, and historian Niccolò Machiavelli , the love of common liberty enabled citizens to see their private and particular interests as part of the common good and helped them to resist corruption and tyranny. While this love of the city is typically intermixed with pride in its military strength and cultural superiority, it is the political institutions and way of life of the city that form the distinctive focal point of this kind of patriotic attachment. To love the city is to be willing to sacrifice one’s own good—including one’s life—for the protection of common liberty.

While patriotism is evident throughout history, it was not always considered a civic virtue. In 18th-century Europe, for example, devotion to the state was considered a betrayal of devotion to the church.

Other 18th-century scholars also found fault with what they considered excessive patriotism. In 1775, Samuel Johnson , whose 1774 essay The Patriot had criticized those who falsely claimed devotion to Britain, famously called patriotism “the last refuge of the scoundrel.”

Arguably, America’s first patriots were its Founding Fathers who had risked their very lives to create a nation that reflected their visions of freedom with equality. They summarized this vision in The Declaration of Independence :

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

In that single sentence, the Founders dispelled the long-held belief of the ruling British Monarchy that an individual’s pursuit of personal happiness was nothing more than a disloyal act of self-indulgence. Instead, they acknowledged that the right of each citizen to pursue personal fulfillment was essential to the qualities, such as ambition and creativity, that would fuel the nation’s economy. As a result, the pursuit of happiness became and remains the force behind America’s entrepreneurial system of free-market capitalism .

The Declaration of Independence further states, “That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” In this phrase, the Founding Fathers rejected the autocratic rule of monarchs and confirmed the revolutionary principle of “government of the people, by the people” as the basis of American democracy and the reason the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution begins with the words “We the People.”

Examples of Patriotism

There are countless ways of showing patriotism. Standing for the National Anthem and reciting the Pledge of Allegiance are obvious ones. Perhaps more importantly, many of the most beneficial acts of patriotism in the U.S. are those that both celebrate the country and make it stronger. A few of these include:

Participating in the representative democracy by registering to vote and voting in elections .
Volunteering for community service or running for elected government office.
Serving on juries.
Obeying all laws and paying taxes.
Understanding the rights, freedoms, and responsibilities contained in the U.S. Constitution.

Patriotism vs. Nationalism

While the words patriotism and nationalism were once considered synonyms, they have taken on different connotations. While both are the feelings of love people feel for their country, the values upon which those feelings are based are very different.

Feelings of patriotism are based on the positive values the country embraces—like freedom, justice, and equality. The patriot believes that both the system of government and the people of their country are inherently good and work together for a better quality of life.

In contrast, feelings of nationalism are based on a belief that one’s country is superior to all others. It also carries a connotation of distrust or disapproval of other countries, leading to the assumption that other countries are rivals. While patriots do not automatically denigrate other countries, nationalists do, sometimes to the point of calling for their country’s global dominance. Nationalism, through its protectionist beliefs, is the polar opposite of globalism .

Historically, the effects of nationalism have been both positive and negative. While it has driven independence movements, like the Zionist movement that created modern Israel, it was also a key factor in the rise of the German Nazi Party , and the Holocaust .

Patriotism versus nationalism arose as a political issue when U.S. President Donald Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron verbally sparred over the meaning of the terms.

At a rally on October 23, 2018, President Trump defended his populist “Make America Great Again” platform and protectionist policies of tariffs on foreign imports, officially declaring himself a “nationalist":

“A globalist is a person that wants the globe to do well, frankly, not caring about our country so much,” he said. “And you know what? We can't have that. You know, they have a word. It sort of became old-fashioned. It's called a nationalist. And I say, really, we’re not supposed to use that word. You know what I am? I’m a nationalist, OK? I’m a nationalist.”

President Macron, speaking at the 100th Armistice Day ceremony in Paris on November 11, 2018, offered a different meaning of nationalism. He defined nationalism as “putting our nation first, and not caring about the others.” By rejecting the interests of other countries, Macon asserted, “we erase what a nation holds dearest, what gives it life, what makes it great and what is essential, its moral values.”

Pros and Cons of Patriotism

Few countries survive and prosper without some degree of patriotic feelings among their people. A love of country and shared pride bring the people together, helping them endure challenges. Without shared patriotic beliefs, colonial Americans may not have chosen to travel the road to independence from England. More recently, patriotism brought the American people together to overcome the Great Depression and achieve victory in World War II .

The potential downside of patriotism is that if it becomes a mandatory political doctrine, it can be used to turn groups of people against each other and can even lead the country to reject its fundamental values.

A few examples from United States history include:

As early as 1798, extreme patriotism, spurred by fears a war with France, led Congress to enact the Alien and Sedition Acts allowing the jailing of certain U.S. immigrants without due process of law and restricting the First Amendment freedoms of speech and the press .

In 1919, early fears of Communism triggered the Palmer raids resulting in the arrest and immediate deportation without trial of more than 10,000 German- and Russian-American immigrants.

After the December 7, 1941, Japanese air raid on Pearl Harbor , the Franklin Roosevelt administration ordered some 127,000 American citizens of Japanese ancestry imprisoned in internment camps for the duration of World War II.

During the Red Scare of the early 1950s, the McCarthy era saw thousands of Americans accused without evidence by the government of being communists or communist sympathizers. After a series of so-called “investigations” conducted by Senator Joseph McCarthy, hundreds of those accused were ostracized and prosecuted for their political beliefs.

Johnson, Samuel (1774). “ The Patriot .” SamuelJohnson.com
“ Nationalism .” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Plato.stanford.edu
Boswell, James, Hibbert, “The Life of Samuel Johnson.” Penguin Classics, ISBN 0-14-043116-0
Diamond, Jeremy. “ Trump embraces 'nationalist' title at Texas rally .” CNN (October 23, 2018)
Liptak. Kevin. “ Macron rebukes nationalism as Trump observes Armistice Day. ” CNN (November 12, 2018)
Republic vs. Democracy: What Is the Difference?
What Is Nationalism? Definition and Examples
Regionalism: Definition and Examples
Veterans Day Quotes
32 Patriotic Independence Day Quotes
Barack Obama's Inspiring 2004 Democratic Convention Speech
What Is Totalitarianism? Definition and Examples
Your Rights and Responsibilities as a New US Citizen
What Are Individual Rights? Definition and Examples
'On National Prejudices' by Oliver Goldsmith
Causes of the Russian Revolution
Comparing Nationalism in China and Japan
What Is Sectionalism? Definition and Examples
What Is Democracy? Definition and Examples
Understanding Political Culture
What Are Natural Rights?

Patriotism vs. Nationalism: What’s The Difference?

You’ve probably heard of public servants carrying out great acts of patriotism . You’ve probably also heard of concerns of a rising wave of nationalism around the world. Yes, both words involve some form of pride in one’s country, but there is an incredibly important distinction to be made between the two.

Historically, both patriotism and nationalism were used roughly in the same way. But they significantly diverged along the way, and one has a much more positive connotation than the other. Do you know which is which?

In this article, we’ll explain the difference between patriotism and nationalism , the different forms they can take and what they can lead to, as well as how to use them correctly.

What is the difference between patriotism and nationalism ?

The word patriotism is a noun that means “devoted love, support, and defense of one’s country; national loyalty.”

The term often brings to mind people directly involved with the defense of a nation, namely military service members as well as state and local government representatives. For example: The soldiers showed exemplary patriotism defending their country from attack.

Patriotism, however, can take many other forms outside serving in the military and public office. Diplomats , teachers, first responders , and so many more all exemplify patriotism in the many forms of good they do in service of their communities.

There are millions of government employees, as well as millions who volunteer their time in the interest of their country. Individual acts of pride, such as displaying an American flag at one’s home, are also examples of patriotism .

The word patriotism is first recorded in the early 1700s. Interestingly, by the 1770s, the word patriot could refer to “a member of a resistance movement, a freedom fighter,” specifically those who fought against the British in the war for independence—associations that persist today.

Patriotism is based on patriot , which is recorded in the 1500s. This word ultimately derives from Greek patriṓtēs , “fellow-countryman or lineage member.” The root of this word, in turn, means “ fatherland .” Paternal , patriarchy , and even English’s own father are related.

Go Behind The Words!

By clicking "Sign Up", you are accepting Dictionary.com Terms & Conditions and Privacy policies.
Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

In most contexts today, nationalism is “the policy or doctrine of asserting the interests of one’s own nation viewed as separate from the interests of other nations or the common interests of all nations.” In short, nationalism is a kind of excessive, aggressive patriotism.

Modern nationalism is rooted, in part, in French and American revolutions that fought for the sovereignty of their people over monarchies. This historic nationalism is generally viewed favorably, a cornerstone of Western liberalism and democracy.

However, fascist regimes have merged the fervor of nationalism with the notions of superiority, especially when it comes to ethnicity and religion. In such contexts, “patriots” can become those who happened to agree with you or look like you, and “traitors” those who do not.

This form of nationalism is what happens when patriotism gets out of hand and morphs into something more exclusionary, isolationist, and … well, chauvinist . For example, The lecturer’s speech on immigration and foreign policy quickly devolved into nationalism , blaming undocumented migrants for the climbing unemployment rate, making much of the audience feel uneasy .

Such nationalism can result in jingoism , which is a form of extreme nationalism promoting vigilant preparedness for war and an aggressive foreign policy. It can also result in isolationism , or “the policy or doctrine of isolating one’s country from the affairs of other nations by declining to enter into alliances, foreign economic commitments, international agreement.”

Recorded in the early 1800s, nationalism , as you probably guessed, is based on nation , ultimately from a Latin word meaning “birth, tribe.”

How to use patriotism vs. nationalism

When using these words, it’s important to keep context, and connotation , in mind:

Patriotism generally has a positive connotation. It’s used for various positive sentiments, attitudes, and actions involving loving one’s country and serving the great good of all its people.

Nationalism generally has a negative connotation. It’s used for political ideologies and movements that a more extreme and exclusionary love of one’s country—at the expense of foreigners, immigrants, and even people in a country who aren’t believed to belong in some way, often racial and religious grounds.

Commonly Confused

Trending Words

[ ek-spi- dish - uh s ]

Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

What is the difference between nationalism and patriotism?

Assistant Professor of Political Science, Westminster College

Disclosure statement

Joshua Holzer does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

View all partners

During his presidency, Donald Trump said, “We’re putting America first … we’re taking care of ourselves for a change,” and then declared, “ I’m a nationalist .” In another speech , he stated that under his watch, the U.S. had “ embrace[d] the doctrine of patriotism .”

Trump is now running for president again. When he announced his candidacy, he stated that he “ need[s] every patriot on board because this is not just a campaign, this is a quest to save our country.”

One week later he dined in Mar-a-Lago with Nick Fuentes , a self-described nationalist who’s been banned from Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube and other platforms for using racist and antisemitic language .

Afterward, Trump confirmed that meeting but did not denounce Fuentes, despite calls for him to do so .

The words nationalism and patriotism are sometimes used as synonyms, such as when Trump and his supporters describe his America First agenda. But many political scientists , including me , don’t typically see those two terms as equivalent – or even compatible.

There is a difference, and it’s important, not just to scholars but to regular citizens as well.

A comic depicting Superman talking to people about treating others with respect and dignity.

Devotion to a people

To understand what nationalism is, it’s useful to understand what a nation is – and isn’t.

A nation is a group of people who share a history, culture, language, religion or some combination thereof.

A country , which is sometimes called a state in political science terminology, is an area of land that has its own government.

A nation-state is a homogeneous political entity mostly comprising a single nation. Nation-states are rare , because nearly every country is home to more than one national group. One example of a nation-state would be North Korea , where almost all residents are ethnic Koreans.

The United States is neither a nation nor a nation-state. Rather, it is a country of many different groups of people who have a variety of shared histories, cultures, languages and religions.

Some of those groups are formally recognized by the federal government, such as the Navajo Nation and the Cherokee Nation . Similarly, in Canada, the French-speaking Québécois are recognized as being a distinct “ nation within a united Canada .”

Nationalism is, per one dictionary definition, “ loyalty and devotion to a nation .” It is a person’s strong affinity for those who share the same history, culture, language or religion. Scholars understand nationalism as exclusive , boosting one identity group over – and at times in direct opposition to – others.

The Oath Keepers and Proud Boys – 10 of whom were convicted of seditious conspiracy for their role in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol – are both examples of white nationalist groups, which believe that immigrants and people of color are a threat to their ideals of civilization.

Trump has described the events that took place on Jan. 6, 2021, as having occurred “ Peacefully & Patrioticly ”. He has described those who have been imprisoned as “ great patriots ” and has said that he would pardon “ a large portion of them ” if elected in 2024.

There are many other nationalisms beyond white nationalism. The Nation of Islam , for instance, is an example of a Black nationalist group. The Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center have both characterized it as a Black supremacist hate group for its anti-white prejudices.

In addition to white and Black racial nationalisms , there are also ethnic and lingustic nationalisms, which typically seek greater autonomy for – and the eventual independence of – certain national groups. Examples include the Bloc Québécois , the Scottish Nationalist Party and Plaid Cymru – the Party of Wales , which are nationalist political parties that respectively advocate for the Québécois of Québéc, the Scots of Scotland and the Welsh of Wales.

Devotion to a place

In contrast to nationalism’s loyalty for or devotion to one’s nation, patriotism is, per the same dictionary, “ love for or devotion to one’s country .” It comes from the word patriot , which itself can be traced back to the Greek word patrios , which means “of one’s father.”

In other words, patriotism has historically meant a love for and devotion to one’s fatherland , or country of origin.

Patriotism encompasses devotion to the country as a whole – including all the people who live within it. Nationalism refers to devotion to only one group of people over all others.

An example of patriotism would be Martin Luther King Jr.’s “ I Have a Dream ” speech, in which he recites the first verse of the patriotic song “ America (My Country ‘Tis of Thee) .” In his “ Letter from Birmingham Jail ,” King describes “nationalist groups” as being “ made up of people who have lost faith in America .”

George Orwell, the author of “ Animal Farm ” and “ Nineteen Eighty-Four ,” describes patriotism as “ devotion to a particular place and a particular way of life.”

He contrasted that with nationalism, which he describes as “the habit of identifying oneself with a single nation or other unit, placing it beyond good and evil and recognizing no other duty than that of advancing its interests.”

Nationalism vs. patriotism

Adolf Hitler’s rise in Germany was accomplished by perverting patriotism and embracing nationalism. According to Charles de Gaulle , who led Free France against Nazi Germany during World War II and later became president of France, “ Patriotism is when love of your own people comes first; nationalism, when hate for people other than your own comes first .”

The tragedy of the Holocaust was rooted in the nationalistic belief that certain groups of people were inferior. While Hitler is a particularly extreme example , in my own research as a human rights scholar , I have found that even in contemporary times, countries with nationalist leaders are more likely to have bad human rights records.

After World War II, President Harry Truman signed the Marshall Plan , which would provide postwar aid to Europe. The intent of the program was to help European countries “ break away from the self-defeating actions of narrow nationalism .”

For Truman, putting America first did not mean exiting the global stage and sowing division at home with nationalist actions and rhetoric . Rather, he viewed the “principal concern of the people of the United States” to be “the creation of conditions of enduring peace throughout the world.” For him, patriotically putting the interests of his country first meant fighting against nationalism.

This view is in line with that of French President Emmanuel Macron , who has stated that “ patriotism is the exact opposite of nationalism .”

“ Nationalism,” he says, “is a betrayal of patriotism .”

US politics
Human rights
George Orwell
Political science
Nationalism
Adolf Hitler
Donald Trump
Harry Truman
Emmanuel Macron
America First
"America First"
Marjorie Taylor Greene

Stephen Knight Lecturer in Medieval Literature

Postdoctoral Research Fellowship

Social Media Producer

Dean (Head of School), Indigenous Knowledges

Senior Research Fellow - Curtin Institute for Energy Transition (CIET)

Patriotism vs. Nationalism: Understanding the Key Differences

By: Author English Study Online

Posted on Last updated: March 9, 2024

Sharing is caring!

When it comes to expressing love and loyalty towards one’s country, the terms patriotism and nationalism are often used interchangeably. However, there is a significant difference between the two concepts. While both patriotism and nationalism involve a deep affection for one’s country, nationalism can take on an extreme form that can be harmful to other nations and people.

Patriotism vs. Nationalism

Table of Contents

What is Patriotism?

Defining patriotism.

Patriotism is the feeling of love, devotion, and sense of attachment to one’s country, often expressed by a willingness to sacrifice for it, and the celebration of the nation’s history, culture, and values.

Patriotism is characterized by a deep love and loyalty to one’s country. It involves a sense of pride in one’s national identity and a desire to defend one’s country from external threats. Patriotism is often associated with sacrifice and service to one’s country.

Some key characteristics of patriotism include:

Love and devotion to one’s country
Pride in national identity
Desire to defend one’s country
Willingness to sacrifice for the common good
Service to one’s country

Historical Context

The concept of patriotism can be traced back to ancient civilizations such as Greece and Rome. In these societies, patriotism was seen as a virtue and a duty of citizens to defend their city-state. During the Middle Ages, loyalty to one’s lord or king was considered a form of patriotism.

The modern concept of patriotism emerged during the Age of Enlightenment, when the idea of the nation-state became popular. In the 18th and 19th centuries, patriotism became associated with the defense of national identity and the promotion of national unity.

What is Nationalism?

Defining nationalism.

Nationalism is a political ideology that emphasizes the interests and culture of a particular nation, often in contrast to those of other nations. It is a belief system that holds that a nation, defined by its language, culture, and history, is the most important unit of political identity and that the interests of the nation should be prioritized over those of other nations or international organizations.

Nationalism is characterized by several key features. These include:

A belief in the importance of the nation as a political entity
A focus on the interests of the nation, often to the exclusion of other nations or international organizations
A sense of pride in the nation’s history, culture, and achievements
A belief in the superiority of the nation’s values and way of life
A desire for national self-determination, often expressed through demands for independence or autonomy
A willingness to defend the nation’s interests, often through military means

Nationalism emerged as a political force in the late 18th and early 19th centuries in Europe, as a reaction to the rise of the modern nation-state and the decline of traditional empires. It was closely linked to the idea of self-determination, which held that each nation should have its own state and government. Nationalism played a key role in the unification of Italy and Germany in the 19th century and the breakup of multinational empires such as the Austro-Hungarian Empire and the Ottoman Empire after World War I.

Patriotism vs. Nationalism: Examples in Society

Examples of patriotism.

Patriotism can be seen in many different aspects of society. It is often expressed through symbols such as the national flag or anthem. Patriotism can also be seen in the actions of individuals who serve in the military or other public service roles.

Examples of patriotism in society include:

Military service
Public service
Displaying the national flag or other symbols of national identity
Supporting national sports teams
Celebrating national holidays

In conclusion, patriotism is a complex and multifaceted concept that has evolved over time. It is characterized by a deep love and loyalty to one’s country and a desire to defend it from external threats. Patriotism can be seen in many different aspects of society, from military service to public displays of national identity.

Examples of Nationalism

Nationalism has played a significant role in many historical and contemporary events. Some examples of nationalism in action include:

The rise of Nazi Germany and its emphasis on Aryan supremacy and the need for Lebensraum (living space)
The breakup of Yugoslavia in the 1990s, as various ethnic groups sought to establish their own independent states
The ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine, which is rooted in competing national claims to the same territory
The rise of populist nationalist movements in many countries, including the United States, Hungary, and Brazil, which have emphasized the interests of the nation over those of international organizations or global cooperation.

Patriotism vs. Nationalism : A Comparative Analysis

Differences in ideology.

Patriotism and nationalism are often used interchangeably, but they are not the same thing. Patriotism is a love for one’s country and a willingness to defend it against enemies. Nationalism, on the other hand, is an extreme form of patriotism that emphasizes the superiority of one’s country over all others.

Patriotism is based on the idea that a nation is made up of individuals who share common values, traditions, and beliefs. It is a unifying force that brings people together and promotes a sense of community. Nationalism, on the other hand, is based on the idea that a nation is defined by its ethnicity, language, or culture. This can lead to exclusionary policies that discriminate against minority groups.

Impact on Society

Patriotism and nationalism have different impacts on society. Patriotism promotes a sense of unity and belonging, which can lead to a stronger and more cohesive society. It encourages people to work together for the common good and to support each other in times of need.

Nationalism, on the other hand, can be divisive and lead to conflict. It can create an “us vs. them” mentality that pits one group against another. This can lead to discrimination, prejudice, and even violence against minority groups.

Role in Politics

Patriotism and nationalism also play different roles in politics. Patriotism is often used to rally support for a government or a cause. It can be a unifying force that brings people together behind a common goal.

Nationalism, on the other hand, can be used to justify aggressive or expansionist policies. It can lead to a sense of entitlement that justifies the use of force to achieve political goals. This can lead to conflicts with other countries and even wars.

Implications of Patriotism and Nationalism

Influence on international relations.

Patriotism and nationalism can have a significant impact on international relations. Countries that prioritize patriotism tend to focus on their own interests and may be less willing to engage in international cooperation. On the other hand, countries that prioritize nationalism may view their own country as superior to others, leading to conflicts with other nations.

For example, during World War II, Nazi Germany’s extreme nationalism led to the invasion of other countries and the genocide of millions of people. In contrast, the United States’ patriotism during the war led to a focus on protecting their own country and allies, while also working with other nations to defeat the Axis powers.

Effect on Domestic Policies

Patriotism and nationalism can also have an impact on domestic policies. A country that prioritizes patriotism may focus on improving the lives of its citizens and promoting national unity. However, this can sometimes lead to policies that exclude or discriminate against minority groups.

On the other hand, a country that prioritizes nationalism may prioritize the interests of the majority group over minority groups, potentially leading to discrimination and social unrest.

For example, in India, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) promotes nationalism and Hindu supremacy, leading to policies that discriminate against Muslims and other minority groups. In contrast, countries like Canada and Australia prioritize patriotism, which has led to policies promoting multiculturalism and inclusivity.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are some examples of patriotism?

Patriotism can manifest in various ways, such as displaying the national flag, participating in national holidays and events, supporting national sports teams, and showing respect for national symbols and institutions. Patriotism also involves a sense of duty towards the country, including voting, paying taxes, and serving in the military or other public service.

What is the importance of patriotism?

Patriotism can help foster a sense of national unity and identity, which can be important for a country’s stability and prosperity. It can also inspire individuals to work towards the betterment of their country and fellow citizens. However, excessive patriotism can lead to xenophobia, discrimination, and a blind acceptance of government policies.

What is the importance of nationalism?

Nationalism is the belief that one’s country is superior to others and should have control over its own affairs. It can be a powerful force for mobilizing people towards a common goal, such as independence or national pride. However, extreme nationalism can lead to conflicts with other countries and groups, as well as a disregard for human rights and international cooperation.

What are the similarities between nationalism and patriotism?

Nationalism and patriotism both involve a love and loyalty towards one’s country, as well as a desire to promote its interests and values. They can both inspire people to work towards the betterment of their country and fellow citizens. However, nationalism is often associated with a more aggressive and exclusive form of national pride, while patriotism is seen as a more inclusive and tolerant form of national pride.

How does Orwell differentiate between nationalism and patriotism?

George Orwell famously wrote that “Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism.” He argued that nationalism involves a desire for power and domination over others, while patriotism involves a love and loyalty towards one’s country without necessarily seeking to impose it on others. Orwell believed that nationalism was a dangerous force that could lead to war and oppression.

What is the difference between nationalism and patriotism?

The main difference between nationalism and patriotism is the extent of one’s loyalty and pride towards their country. Nationalism involves a belief in the superiority of one’s country and a desire to promote its interests above those of others, often at the expense of international cooperation and human rights. Patriotism involves a love and loyalty towards one’s country, but without necessarily believing it is superior to others or seeking to dominate them.

Difference Between Nationalism and Patriotism

• Categorized under Ideology , Language , Politics | Difference Between Nationalism and Patriotism

Nationalism and patriotism both show the relationship of an individual towards his or her nation. The two are often confused and frequently believed to mean the same thing. However, there is a vast difference between nationalism and patriotism.

Nationalism means to give more importance to unity by way of a cultural background, including language and heritage. Patriotism pertains to the love for a nation, with more emphasis on values and beliefs.

When talking about nationalism and patriotism, one cannot avoid the famous quotation by George Orwell , who said that nationalism is ‘the worst enemy of peace’. According to him, nationalism is a feeling that one’s country is superior to another in all respects, while patriotism is merely a feeling of admiration for a way of life. These concepts show that patriotism is passive by nature and nationalism can be a little aggressive.

Patriotism is based on affection and nationalism is rooted in rivalry and resentment. One can say that nationalism is militant by nature and patriotism is based on peace.

Most nationalists assume that their country is better than any other, whereas patriots believe that their country is one of the best and can be improved in many ways. Patriots tend to believe in friendly relations with other countries while some nationalists don’t.

In patriotism, people all over the world are considered equal but nationalism implies that only the people belonging to one’s own country should be considered one’s equal.

A patriotic person tends to tolerate criticism and tries to learn something new from it, but a nationalist cannot tolerate any criticism and considers it an insult.

Nationalism makes one to think only of one’s country’s virtues and not its deficiencies. Nationalism can also make one contemptuous of the virtues of other nations. Patriotism, on the other hand, pertains to value responsibilities rather than just valuing loyalty towards one’s own country.

Nationalism makes one try to find justification for mistakes made in the past, while patriotism enables people to understand both the shortcomings and improvements made.

Patriot: Expresses the emotion of love towards his country in a passive way

Nationalist: Strives for independence and the interests and domination of a nation and expresses his love or concern for the country in an active political way.

Recent Posts
Difference Between CNBC and Fox Business - October 3, 2011
Difference Between Distilled Water and Boiled Water - September 30, 2011
Difference Between McDonalds and Burger King - September 30, 2011

Sharing is caring!

Pinterest 105

Search DifferenceBetween.net :

Difference Between Communism and Nationalism
Difference Between Race and Nationality
Difference Between Nation and Country
Difference Between Ethnicity and Nationality
Difference Between Beautiful and Hot

Cite APA 7 S, P. (2018, February 26). Difference Between Nationalism and Patriotism. Difference Between Similar Terms and Objects. http://www.differencebetween.net/language/difference-between-nationalism-and-patriotism/. MLA 8 S, Prabhat. "Difference Between Nationalism and Patriotism." Difference Between Similar Terms and Objects, 26 February, 2018, http://www.differencebetween.net/language/difference-between-nationalism-and-patriotism/.

95 Comments

Nationalism, aggressive?

Nationalism IS NOT Fascism. Do not get the two mixed up; if you do you end up with communist idiots like yourself writing sub-par pseudo-political articles such as this.

Here’s an ‘Difference between’ for you good sir, the difference between this and other articles is that this is laughably shite; shite of the utmost shitest quality.

Try harder, little red writer !

Craig McCulley,

My thoughts exactly. You are a Nationalist and a Patriot, as am I! I salute you and your country! Live long and prosper!

You are stuck in the 50s faggot.

Nationalism is a disease preventing mankind’s progression into the future. This coupled with religion spells our fate as a doomed species.

Your country is a land mass which you just happened to be born on. Your implemented barriers promote isolation and foster ignorance of other cultures and leads to friction.

Enjoy jerking it to your flag buddy, while your government robs you of whatever “freedom” you have left.

Hahahahaha poor baby.

Nationalism is the disease killing the world? Nationalism isn’t even a strong force in the modern world! Seriously, I think you’re the one thinking in cold war terms here bro. Nationalism ( Which isn’t Fascism, as I explained in my original post, but you seem to have difficulty understanding) has no real power in today’s globalist society and mist certainly isn’t preventing anyone advancing anywhere.

It’s people like you who hinder mankinds progression, ultra-liberal atheist fundamentalists ( Worse than Nazis in my opinion). You say I, as a nationalist am ignorant of other cultures, yet your own ideology promotes the destruction of national identities and cultures all over the world, you also actively discriminate people on their religious beliefs on a scale never taken upon by any religion ever seen in the past. Really, it is you, who is ignorant of culture and hinders the progression of man kind.

Finally, your argument of my country is just where I happened to be born, is hilarious! People don’t just appear in random nations across the world, that’s not how childbirth works LOL!! I didn’t appear anyway, I can trace my ancestry in Scotland back to 500sAD, around the time Celtic prehistory ended. Thus indicating the line could go even farther back in time. I didn’t just ‘happen’ to be born here, my genes, my lineage, has been here for thousands of years, it is my land, my heritage

Your argument is as retarded as the ideology you follow. If I were you, I would bite my tongue when conversing with followers of an higher ideology – and oh, if you’re trolling (which I hope you are, the thought of people like you actually voting sends shivers down my spine!) then please, don’t do it again, your not very good at it!

LOLOL other than McCarthy and the whole civil rights thing, what exactly do you find wrong with the 50’s?

LOLOLOL….Joe McCarthy was RIGHT about all the commies in government. Just look at what they have done to our great nation

Typical of the Christians, shifting the blame onto non-believers. Next thing you’ll know they’ll claim that the Muslims and Christians were all Atheists were all Atheists who wanted to make religion look bad.

Nationalism is what the “N” stands for in NAZI. The American National Socialist party defines itself as the American Nazi party and say they are “committed to bringing American National Socialism out of the past.”

Leslie, as you yourself demonstrate the “N” DOESN’T stand for “Nationalism”!

It stands for “NATIONAL”!!

As in “National SOCIALISM”!!!

There is NO “famous quotation by George Orwell, who said that nationalism is ‘the worst enemy of peace’.”

There is an essay by Orwell in which he discusses something for which there is NO word in English that he contrasts with Patriotism.

And therefore borrows the word “Nationalism” as shorthand for this concept within the essay (only).

Therefore, “According to him,” the ACTUAL word “nationalism is” NOT “a feeling that one’s country is superior to another in all respects”!

Furthermore, this concept he labels “Nationalism” for the purposes of the essay, he applies to things like religions, political movements, including Communism and Trotskyism, and even negative things such as hatred of a country, INCLUDING ONE’S OWN.

And he specifically disparages the way English intellectuals often are “Nationalists” in their love of the USSR and/or hatred of England, Britain and/or the United States.

If you actually bothered to read his Essay (without bias) you would have realised that it perfectly describes todays “Nationalists” (of his essay):

US “Democrats”, “liberals”, Greens, Environmentalists, UK Europhiles, Islamophiles…

Read his actual essay without blinkers, and see for yourself!

Oh, and if:

“In patriotism, people all over the world are considered equal”

How on earth can it be possible to claim: “Patriotism pertains to the love for a nation”?!

Sir, you just made my day. I knew there were wise people like you, and I hope that everyone would be like you and have the skill to right as beautifully as you do. Have a really good day sir(/ma’am) =)

Excuse me Mr. McCully. Why do you asume that someone bashing religion and nationalism has to be an atheist. I am a Christian, and I’ve read in the New Testament that the Gospel of Jesus is NOT pride for country, or love for money, or hate against others who think any different, but LOVE!!! If you are not a Christian, please ignore my comment altogether, for I respect whatever you believe, since Jesus NEVER condemned anyone, not even the romans who tortured and killed him. He even asked the Father to forgive them. But if you ARE a “Christian”, in the name of Jesus I rebuke you! For being the exact example of why so many souls are being twrown to hell, since for “Christian” examples like yours, they turn atheists or satanists. The Bible itself teacher that “thou shalt judge them by their fruit”. What fruit are you giving??? The one of hate, pride (Lucifer’s sin) and violence??? Jesus said that the foremost commandment was to love God with all you mind, heart and strength and your neighbor as yourself.

I agree Nationalism is not Fascism, but is it any better? The English Empire murdered thousands, yet, it wasn’t Fascism. Nevertheless, it is the doorway to it. Do you think the German soldiers who died in WWII had any different reasons for fighting than any other “nationalist”? They did so for “God, Freedom and Country”, as they were indoctrinated. Just like the poor American kids being sent to a war were they’re taught to kill a satanized enemy, causing millions of innocent deaths.

I’m sorry if I offend you, and I’m sorry if I’ve hurt your heart, but please learn to discern from the lies of Satan and the world. This is the TRUE gospel: Love. If you don’t love, please don’t call yourself a Christian. I’ll pray for you, and leave you with 1 Corinthians 13 New International Version (NIV)

13 If I speak in the tongues[a] of men or of angels, but do not have love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. 2 If I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing. 3 If I give all I possess to the poor and give over my body to hardship that I may boast,[b] but do not have love, I gain nothing.

4 Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. 5 It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. 6 Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. 7 It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.

Read more: Difference Between Nationalism and Patriotism | Difference Between | Nationalism vs Patriotism http://www.differencebetween.net/language/difference-between-nationalism-and-patriotism/#ixzz2JzinPe5n

I think you’ve misunderstood assas’s arguement about being born into a particular society or culture.. lol.

You have to be a troll. I refuse to believe people are this dumb. I especially found the part where you said you can trace your heritage to 500 AD, that’s good stuff.

This may shock you Scott. But just because you cannot trace your line back that far within your own country doesn’t mean I cannot either.

Ever heard of records? Good stuff.

He is not a troll, he is a big standard Nationalist. Judges the world on nationality (an accident of birth) and not on action or a desire for peace and unity. They project their fantasies onto a blank canvas (in the Scottish case, independence from a 300 year old union with the rest of their island.) and when mixed with Scotland’s humungous Irish population, you can see why 35.5% of registered voters (49.9% of who turned up to vote) got behind the populist SNP.

Scottish Nationalists have proven themselves to be among some of the most bitter and conspiratorial of Nationalists.

They are like a BNP or Front Nationale, but with left wing rhetoric and faux-progressivism.

I think it is really just an engrained hatred of the English from “true Scot” nationalists, and just anti-British bigotry & hatred from Scots Irish who are raised on a diet of one sided misrepresented Irish Republican propaganda.

Dont be fooled. Einstein was right.

The measles of mankind……..highly infectious and entirely destructive.

Scotland used to be known as the fun part of the UK, good with money, built the British empire, led the way in finance, medicine and technology as the newly formed UK allowed wealth to flood into Scotland (who were bankrupt at the time).

All Nationalist Scot’s have is clinging to misrepresented data about oil revenues over the last 30 years…..with no thought AT ALL to the English, N.Irish and Welsh who have supported and bailed them out at various times over the last 300 years!

Not to mention the ultimate fight against fascism. And I mean actual fascism, not the fascism that Scots Irish attribute to the most diverse and internationalist country on Earth, the UK.

There is a pettyness and insecurity (and a lack of ACTUAL historic knowledge on their part) from Scottish Nationalists.

Scotland was known as the “wee” conscious and brains behind the British Empire and the UK’s ascension to a world power, now, they look like a divided parochial “wee” mess of Irish Republicans, conspiracy theorists, radical socialists, conspiracy theorists, far-left radicals and bitter Nationalists.

Luckily, the numbers show they are a minority who only dominate their politics because 64% of Scottish voters either vote other parties or chose not to vote.

Sad. Watching a once global titan, failing to see 1) what they have and 2) trying to run away, scrap all their national defences, create a one party state and hand over more autonomy to the EU than the UK even has.

Maybe the majority will get through to the loud minority one day.

I think another referendum in the next 2 years will be needed to put it to bed once and for all.

Staggering that 55% of individual votes, a 10% double-digit gap and 28 out of 32 regions rejecting separation was STILL no enough to get through to Nationalists.

Alba Gu Brath and all that.

You sound like a blood, soil and thunder Nationalist. Slightly unhinged, emotionally hysterical and you actually fit the caricature listed in the article here, the article that you decry, lol. You are Scottish, so you should know the dangers of Nationalism. The majority of Scotland chose economic, defensive and societal security in their recent referendum. Scottish Nationalists characterize it as “cowardice” “brainwashed by bias media” etc etc. Rather than the fact that many Scots made it clear, in the post ref polling, that they voted No for security, economic protection and national security.

In fact, your Nationalist party took 49.9% of a 71% turnout (yet somehow got 90% of UK Govt Scottish WM seats!), so only 35.5% of registered voters even voted your all powerful Nationalist party, lol.

Check the numbers and see how failed an endeavour Scottish Nationalism REALLY is. Ignore your media and the propaganda conspiracy blogs that SNP supporters seem to quote at every turn –

Yes voters – 1.6 million No voters – 2.1 million

Yes vote by council – 4/32 No vote by council – 28/32

SNP vote share in 2015 – 49.9% 2015 GE Scottish turnout – 71% Registered Voters in Scotland – 4.1 million Total Scottish Voter share – 35.5%

Voted SNP – 1.4 million Voted opposition parties – 1.4 million Registered voters who chose not to vote for any party – 1.3 million.

So in short, in Scotland –

Scottish Nationalists – 1.4 million definite, rising to 1.6 million at referendum.

Non-Nationalists – 2.7 million definite, around 2.1 million rejecting independence at referendum.

Not all Yes voters were Nationalists and not all No voters were Unionists.

I know this will probably be met with anger, rage, emotion, misdirection and hysteria……but these are the simple, documented, factual numbers.

But then being a Nationalist…..you will probably wail a lot and yell “conspiracy” or one of the usual misdirections.

Have a great day.

This guy is the perfect example as to why the average person now realises that nationalists aren’t capable of reasoning. Surely you nationalists can do better than “ultra-liberal atheists are worse than nazis, also it is YOU that is ignorant!”.

And five years later we have trump, an anti intellectual nationalist (which is redundant). And you see the anger and fear he has brought out in people. Unfortunately, it is a force now.

I have a dream, that one day, We will no longer surrender this country or its people to the false song of globalism.

Globalism will never be even remotely viable in the presence of the ideological disease that is Islam.

While I am not a nationalist and am an atheist, I am a liberal and I’d like to say that leftists are the people that have always been against nationalism.

Me thinks thou doth protest too much…

You are the same as those who crowd into city streets and chant “end racism, end prejudice!!!” whenever any law that considers anything that may possibly affect immigration in such a way so as to reduce it; or whenever a law meant to wedge your nation’s borders open as wide as possible meats any scant opposition. You are simply a maggot; a clone of the many millions of brainless fools just like you.

I think your nation is not falling fast enough as you want- you should go and hasten its demise as your kind so desperately strive to do.

Why use the term “faggot”? It shows maybe you are stuck in the 50s with a homophobic attitude. You clearly have not read the article through properly but have chosen to launch an attack on the writer and attemted to insult with a homophobic term.

@assas Hahahahahaha, you call someone faggot and tell THEM to go back to the 1950s. That is beyond rich.

Oh, and there’s also your eye-rolling commenton religion. Pick that one up at a Reddit “Post your fedora” thread? Also your delusional comment on increasingly tyrannical government. Both indicate you’re an edgelord who loves that immensely unfunny hack George Carlin.

That, or you’re an Alt-Rightist from 4/8-chan. Either way, not a good look.

If you live in a country other than the U.S. your government or dictatorship has already taken yours.

Excuse me Sir. Why do you asume that someone bashing religion and nationalism has to be an atheist. I am a Christian, and I’ve read in the New Testament that the Gospel of Jesus is NOT pride for country, or love for money, or hate against others who think any different, but LOVE!!! If you are not a Christian, please ignore my comment altogether, for I respect whatever you believe, since Jesus NEVER condemned anyone, not even the romans who tortured and killed him. He even asked the Father to forgive them. But if you ARE a “Christian”, in the name of Jesus I rebuke you! For being the exact example of why so many souls are being twrown to hell, since for “Christian” examples like yours, they turn atheists or satanists. The Bible itself teacher that “thou shalt judge them by their fruit”. What fruit are you giving??? The one of hate, pride (Lucifer’s sin) and violence??? Jesus said that the foremost commandment was to love God with all you mind, heart and strength and your neighbor as yourself.

If you want to be this kind of Christian then please continue to do what you do and please preach this to more Christians. This is totally cool with me. You’re not putting your beliefs on anyone else and who knows…maybe you’ll win some of us over. Kudos to you.

Thanks, I have an keep doing it. God bless you.

I agree and salute (not in the nationalist sense) your message. This is the right way to bring meaning to Jesus’ message.

That is confusing I understood a couple of sentences Is it bad to love someone that does not believe in religion God wants us to love but he wants us to worship him to?

Question #1:

“Is it bad to love someone that does not believe in religion”

I think you should ask yourself: “Is is bad to love someone who does not LOVE God”, and if it is so, the answer is yes. It is bad, because that person will bring you away from Him, or will eventually become a thorn on your back. The Bible states:

2 Corinthians 6:14 New Living Translation (NLT) The Temple of the Living God

14 Don’t team up with those who are unbelievers. How can righteousness be a partner with wickedness? How can light live with darkness?

You shouldn’t believe in religion to start with. The word “Christian” is already tainted, stained with the evils of religion. Think of yourself as a follower, an imitator of Jesus. If you read your Bible, and obey the New Testament, trying to keep yourself sin-free; and if you keep a personal relationship with the Father, keeping Him as #1, and ignore the world’s hate and criticism against you, then you are a Jesus follower, and NOT a religious person.

If you’re just a church goer who lets his/her religious leader (Priest or Pastor) do the thinking and Bible reading for you, and just follow what everyone else does, adopt a religious jargon, and keep appearances, but live a sinful life as soon as you leave the temple, but criticize and condemn anyone who thinks different than you, then you ARE a religious person, and another hypocrite, for atheists and satanists to blaspheme against our Father.

Question #2: “God wants us to love but he wants us to worship him to?”

Yes, he does. But worshipping Him is nothing more that loving Him as #1 in your life, nothing ritualistic about it.

Matthew 22:34-40 New Living Translation (NLT) The Most Important Commandment

34 But when the Pharisees heard that he had silenced the Sadducees with his reply, they met together to question him again. 35 One of them, an expert in religious law, tried to trap him with this question: 36 “Teacher, which is the most important commandment in the law of Moses?”

37 Jesus replied, “‘You must love the Lord your God with all your heart, all your soul, and all your mind.’[a] 38 This is the first and greatest commandment. 39 A second is equally important: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’[b] 40 The entire law and all the demands of the prophets are based on these two commandments.”

God bless you.

An “imitator of Jesus” would practice Judaism, worship the Torah and celebrate passover. The last supper was Jesus and his disciples getting together to celebrate passover.

To “Jesus OPPOSED Religion”:

Firstly, I want to congratulate you on your beautiful, beautiful understanding of faith and the world. Indeed, faith and religiousness are NOT the same. Faith is personal, and as such it should be respected but should also respect the personal beliefs of others, even if they are different. Religion is cult, it is group-minded. It requires that you abandon your thinking and, as you said, let the leader do the thinking and the Book-reading for you. And the leader, as faithful as he may be is human, has flaws and, as any human who gets too close to power, is prone to not acting on the best interests of those who lead.

I am an agnostic, but I respect and support personal faith completely. I do have some concerns with religion, and those are the same concerns I have in respect to nationalism: extreme partialness, group-mindedness, closed-mindedness, pride, lack of respect for people outside their nation, religion or group.

I urge everyone to take notice of one thing: these are the very same vices that those nationalists and religious people accuse communism* of having. The pot calls the kettle black. The world doesn’t have enough space for two different extremist doctrines, but so as to avoid acknowledging their hipocrisy, they rationalize this by accusing each other of the only thing they have in common.

There’s just one thing I didn’t understood in your descriptions of your faith: at one point, you say that it is indeed bad to love an unbeliever and even remarks that “righteousness [can’t] walk together with unrighteousness”. Afterwards, you quote the Bible (I don’t remember the exact words): “judge men by their fruit” and “love thy neighbor as you do yourself”. Pardon me if I’m misunderstanding, but isn’t that a contradiction? When you wrote that it’s bad to love the “unfaithful”, that came across to me as the very same kind of separation and judging that nationalists and religious people make. I know that there ARE idiot atheists hell-bent on harassing the faithful in the name of “rationalism”, but I feel offended when you suggest that EVERY unbeliever WILL “bring [a faithful person] away from the path of God”. As I said, I am completely supportive of personal faith and freedom of belief, and I would never get in the way of someone’s faith. And I assure you that most agnostics and atheistics, or at least those I know, are like me. Intolerance and pride aren’t charateristic of us.

—————————

*about “communism”:Extreme left leaders such as Stalin and Mao have been derogatorily called “nationalist socialists” by other leftists and non-authoritarian socialists who disagreed with the authoritary, proud and intolerant behavior of them. “Communism” refers to these such ideologies, but the problem is that it eventually became a derogatory catch-all term for any kind of socialism and even for anyone to the left of center, such as me.

I’d like to remind people here that authoritarism, close-mindedness and pride are NOT intrinsic characteristics of the Left, and most of us condone this kind of behavior/ideology too. Even most socialists (save for Stalinists and the like, obviously) recognize that trying to solve social inequalities by force won’t work and that this is ultimately why the URSS failed. So, please, don’t try to put every leftist in the “communism” box. This kind of namecalling throws away any chance of civilized debate and promotes hate and conflict.

I don’t think it’s bad to love someone who doesn’t love God. God told us to love one another. He doesn’t specify which others. He wants us to love people where they are. You don’t need to love their beliefs or practices, just love them as a fellow human being. This can be very difficult to do, as many, MANY people are hard to love,and we may not want to love them, but we must try, as it is what God commanded. God loves even those who do not love Him, so why shouldn’t we? To not do so would be to imply we are higher than Him and can judge others better than Him.

Just my opinion.

u people need to grow up

This article writer is confused a bit. They are correct about Nationalism; it is a belief that ones Nation and way of life is superior or exceptional in the world. Patriotism, however, is the love of one’s culture, history and customs, as well as a love of the principle of Sovereignty; the right of a people to make their own decisions for themselves.

Patriots of the American Revolution quietly (couldn’t jump in and support because they had just won a war with the support of the French Crown) supported the patriots of the French Revolution because they were fighting for political sovereignty and democracy.

Nationalism IS one of the pillars of Fascism by the way. Along with Conservative-traditional social values (different depending of the Nation) an elevation of the Soldier, superiority of ones culture and or race, and a corporate alliance or dominance of government.

Read a book, don’t just regurgitate talking points.

Yeah Hitler was a Nationalist socialism and he fucking lost World War 2 with his stupid nationalist ideology. Hitler even had a private army of Muslims fighting for him. Nationalism sucks and Hitler just proved it.

nationalism IS fascism… it is a fictitious imaginary boundary you make to justify your ‘love’ of the land and segregate yourself from others. ofcourse there are cultural and socioeconomic differences but to LOVE it? to be prideful of it!?…. is to make oneself superior.

What bullshit subjective morality or ethics is backing your tearful statement that to feel, think and be superior is wrong? Everyone loves Nietzsche so follow the logic, Übermensch.

Hitler was a nationalist…….. name a few more.

Well, you proved the writer’s point perfectly.

Lest we forget, hitler rose to power from the support he received by nationalists. Nationalism can lead to fascism.

Merriman-Webster Dictionary:

These two words may have shared a distinct sense in the 19th century, but they appear to have grown apart since. Or rather, it would be more accurate to say that only nationalism has grown apart, since the meaning of patriotism has remained largely unchanged. There are still obvious areas of overlap: we define patriotism as “love for or devotion to one’s country” and nationalism in part as “loyalty and devotion to a nation.” But the definition of nationalism also includes “exalting one nation above all others and placing primary emphasis on promotion of its culture and interests as opposed to those of other nations or supranational groups.” This exclusionary aspect is not shared by patriotism.

You “sir”, term used loosely here, are the idiot. Nationaism is destroying this country and your response is just vindicating what the author was saying. Grow up and wise moron.

Was not all convinced by the article. All I read was the difference between “nationalism” and “nationalism-lite”.

I like the way and the points you differentiated the two:nationalism and patriotism

I like the answer

the differences displayed between nationalism and patriotism was simple and easily understandable!!!! superb!!!

Yes, but completely false. I am an nationalist, but now way am I aggressive, nor do I think others are inferior. But yes, I would like Finland to be mostly for Finnish people, and I think Finnish heritage is way superior to somali, jews or gypsies.

If you feel your way of life is superior, than you think other’s way of life is inferior. There is no way around it. You are simply a Nationalist. But I do happen to agree that your country has many superior qualities to my own (usa).

This article misunderstands ‘nationalism’ and confuses it with ‘chauvinism.’

With “I think,” I mean to say that I use my brain before I speak. Not like most of the people who also commented here.

I’d say the majority here think the article is also incorrect. So you cannot have thought that hard before you commented.

You’re a tad obnoxious, aren’t you? 🙂

I thought it was well written but it’s obvious you view nationalists as the enemy and patriots as benevolent. I’m a nationalist, so many I’m biased but it’s more centred on the strength of a nation than it is about butting heads with other countries and those who don’t agree with us. I think the fact we target nations we perceive to be threats to the state is what gives us a bad name. For instance, I would be in favor of annulling debt to china and sealing trade, but only because they are flooding our economy.

Patriotism is live for your country for what it have done. Nationalism is love for your country no matter what it has done. Patriots defend their country loyally even if it wrong. A nationalist defends its country so he can be proved right.

I personally believe Patriotism is the ideology of the original patriots AKA the Congress-men. The ideology between the nation and the individual is best described not in the constitution, but in the declaration of independence.

The belief that government is only legitimate with the consent of the governed. It’s highest priority is upholding the liberties outlined in that document. In addition is the strong belief that when a government fails to uphold those liberties, it is no longer a legitimate nation of said patriots.

They are not Nationalists in any way really, the two are actually almost opposites. Patriots are Libertarians by nature, the nation ain’t worth a damn if it takes those liberties.

Nationalists believe in the supremacy of the nation, this necessitates liberties being sacrificed for the benefit of the nation. Liberties themselves only exist to secure the rights of individuals. This doesn’t mean they aren’t important to every Nationalist, but when the choice is exclusive, they place The Nation above Individual Liberties. They can really place anything anywhere, as long as the nation reigns as the top priority.

In addition as a few others have indicated the nation is defined by a group of people with shared heritage. This can be ethnocentric, racial, and/or cultural. It can be set in stone de jure, or even as loose as a “way of life”.

i am 31 years old

I think nationalism can be defined as supporting your country whether what it’s doing is right or wrong.

I agree with other commenters that this article misses the mark, and is really just describing chauvinism. Far too simplistic an interpretation. What of civic nationalism? What of nationalists behind separatist movements (Scotland, Quebec, Catalonia, etc)–movements born more out of a want for self-determination than a sense of inherent superiority? Similarly, nationalism under occupation or aggression, like French nationalism during WW2, Native American nationalism during European/US expansionism, or contemporaneous Tibetan nationalism.

This article is very illogical and shallow, as are many of the comments afterward. A reflection of public discourse in general in America right now? I think so. Very disappointing and sad.

To say that Patriotism is “passive” is an insult to every POW, every veteran, and every soldier who has a white cross for a headstone or is represented by the Tombs of the Unknown Soldiers anywhere in the world.

Some cultures ARE better than others. Any culture that makes it’s women wear burkas and takes them out of school seems to me to be inferior to ones where people of any race and gender can attend school and achieve on the basis of merit.

No culture or heritage is ALL bad or ALL good, but some definitely are tipped toward the good side, including the one I live in now, The Republic of Texas.

As far as Nationalism goes, it is good to have healthy boundaries, especially when facing other nations who want to kill you.

When a culture, including America’s, does engage in something immoral, it should be checked and stopped. But that doesn’t mean everything about it is always “bad”. People are too emotional and reactionary, and the discussion on this thread is a perfect example.

I think some people on this thread just enjoy imagining chaos and anarchy. I think these same people also enjoy the wishful thinking that our enemies are really our friends. Question: If you people who hate Nationalism do get everything you want politically, do you think the chaos will make you happy?

Fences make good neighbors. Read Mending Wall sometime.

j.B, I don’t think you can classify cultures as “good” or “bad”, or even as better or worse.

Cultures aren’t set in stone. They are like breathing, living things. They change. Like people, they can work to correct their flaws, and, like people, all they have to do to start autocorrecting is acknowledging their flaws.

You mention burkas. Yeah, I do agree with you that the Middle East currently has a bad streak of sexism, as well as authoritarism, extremism and such. But we must not overlook the fact that there’s a large number of Muslims who are opposed to thas as well, and frequently even more than we are. And a curiosity about burkas: many Muslim women actually choose to wear them out of their own free will. They are patriots and, since they consider the burka to be a symbol of their culture, wear it proudly. There has been an event where a government proposal against burkas in England (I think) was actually met with animosity from the Muslim women.

Marjane Satrapi immediately comes to mind. She’s an Iranian writer, and her autobiography provides insight into lots of aspects of Islam, but most importantly, it shows how the FUNDAMENTALISTS that are currently in power DO NOT exactly have lots of popular support. They maintain power through FORCE. They’re dictators. And it’s outright ABSURD to judge a culture by the things its dictators do.

And an important fact is that the fundamentalists weren’t always there. That is to say, Islamic countries weren’t always like that. Shit happened when RELIGION and POLITICS got mixed up. They were mixed up in Medieval Europe as well and, surprise, that time is caled the Dark Ages for a reason.

Sexism and authoritarism are NOT components of Islam. They come from the INTERPRETATION of Islam done by the fundamentalists, not from Islam itself.

And I have to remind you: our very own WESTERN CULTURE has corrected itself through the ages. A few examples follow.

Please remember that a thousand years ago the Church conducted the Incquisition and te Crusades. One was a hunt for the healers, women that had “too much knowledge”. The other was a series of unwarranted attacks on the East and there was even a “Children’s Crusade” where thousands of kids were sent to die. Both of these atrocities were commited in the name of Christ, but based on what little I know of the man, this seems like the kind of stuff he would condemn with all His might. Please remember that a few CENTURIES ago the daughters of nobility had no say at all on their lives and were sold into marriage for dowry and/or political alliances. Frequently, it was 15 year old girls being sold do adult men and they were seen as less human and more breeding machines, necessary ONLY for their capacity to produce male heirs. Please remember that a few DECADES ago the US was’t unlike the African Apartheid in its treatment of people of color, and women weren’t allowed to vote or work. Please remember the KKK and Hitler, who used Christianism to rationalize their actions.

Do all these things mean our culture is bad? OF COURSE NOT. Every culture has critical flaws, and these can ALWAYS be corrected. And it may seem to you like our culture is “way ahead” of the Middle East because these issues are things of the past now, but that’s only because they’re being oppressed by theocratic dictators.

Please don’t judge a culture by its flaws before knowing more about it. I know it may seem to us like all Muslims are like that, but it really isn’t so, not even close. The fundamentalists hurt their own people even more than they hurt us.

Also, I jut read Mending Wall. It seems to m that Frost is questioning the notion that “fences make good neighbors”, not just presenting it. He asks himself “why is that?” many times, and by the end it just seems like he goes “oh well, I can’t find an answer for it, but heck, it’s just the way it is, right?” It seems to me that he’s not quite stating that that is HIS chosen answer to the question, but just questioning how people just go with it and never even bother to stop and think WHY, just like his neighbor. You know, sometimes when poets write “I”, they’re not really talking about themselves. This is one of the many quirks that make poetry beautiful.

I WOULD LIKE SOMETHING MORE IMPORTANT WITH REGARD TO BOTH WORDS ,THAT IS THE RELATIOSHIP COMBINING THEM ,,,THE MORE INEQUILIBRIUM IN VALUES THE LESS PATRIOTISM &MORE NATIONALISM ,,THE WHOLE MATTER HAS SOMETHING TO DO WITH THE IDEOLOGIES ,,,A PERFECT ,SOUND IDEOLOGY THAT IS IN HARMONY WITH THE HUMAN NATURE MEANS RISE&FLOURISHMENT IN PATRITISM ,THE REVERSE LEADS TO THE EMERGENCE OF NATIONALISM ,,,,NATIONALISM IS NOT NEEDED ,,WHAT IS NEEDED FOR ANY NATION IS PATRITISM

I like this article, contrary to all y’all.

Right? It seems to me like most of the people that disagree here are really patriots who think they’re nationalists.

What is d difference between home and house?

yes, it’s a little simplistic. and it basically describes ethnic-nationalism, not other kinds, but it is a good summary of nationalism vs. patriotism. the only people who hate this article are nationalists (in fact many have said so right here) who are probably too far gone in their inferiority complexes and hatred to admit any truth in the article.

Trae gets it…All the Nationalists with Napoleon complexes and small d** are the ones who oppose this article. In other words all the Trump supporters. Nationalists to the end. Ignorant, (mostly white males) angry, gun toting, belly aching, uneducated blowhards just like the POTUS. They still want us to live like we did in the 1800’s where they can degrade their wives and all women for that matter with no recourse, have slaves, where white sheets over their ugly mugs, and chant USA, USA, USA all while feeling inferior on the inside. Blasphemous behavior if you ask the rest of us PATRIOTIC Americans.

Hannah , what if God is a ‘her’ not a ‘he’. I would probably trust someone more who does not think you should ‘love’ god and he/she loves us. Nationalism combined with religious dogma is rarely a happy mix nor does it make for a happy ending. If this ‘god’ does love us, he/she has a very funny way of showing it.

even though i love Orwell, i have to disagree with him on this because sometimes civil society maintains a facade of peace under an oppressive rule. it’s stagnation and not peace. nationalism isn’t about a sense of superiority…i’m not sure how developed countries live it out but in my developing country nationalism means striving towards a better society and overcoming despotism. creation goes hand in hand with destruction. setting up new tables and getting rid of old ones does entail violence but it’s a necessity.

You raise a good point. My parents worked in Ghana just after its independence. An optimistic mood of Ghanian natonalismm helped forge different tribes together the build one of Africas most successful nations. South African nationalism galvinised the country in a post aparthide indentity.

No need to disagree with Orwell.

Read the essay.

He borrows the word Nationalism for a concept for which no word exists.

He isn’t defining, or even redefining, nationalism.

But using it as shorthand for another concept he takes a long essay to explain.

Oh, and “his” “nationalism” today would apply to “Democrats”, “liberals”, Western “intellectuals” and academics, and the like!

“nationalism is a feeling that one’s country is superior to another in all respects”

And your contention is, what? You deny that the US is superior to a third world toilet? If so, what are your reasons? Amazingly we are taught the superiority of the pedigree of a dog or horse and many other aspects of nature but when it comes to man the Marxist ceases the scientific method of observation of what is greater and lesser and fly’s a banner of blind equality. If we did not acknowledge the pedigree of our species then would nature progress us to new evolutionary heights? Without pedigree, what sense is there in words such as “progress” or “evolution”? These words are preceded by concepts that are built upon the truth that something can be greater or lesser. So cut the crap, a nation of people can be greater or lesser than another.

“And your contention is, what?”

I obviously can’t speak for the authour here, but my contention is that it is an idiotically complacent attitude to have towards one’s country! For you to feel this “pride”, it require that people before you had to put in a tremendous amount of work to make the US the way it is today.

What if instead it was the US that was a third world shit hole? Are you still going to be full of pride, refusing to see the flaws and issues that need fixing?

Nationalism CAN be static and complacent. It CAN be a position of arrogance hindering people from improving themselves, unless self improvement is hard wired straight into the ethos of the nation, like in Japan for example(at least from the looks of it). Even then, I would say it’s not good enough.

What if you happen to migrate to another country? Are you suddenly going to act like a slime ball on account of no longer living in the country you were born to? Or are you going to be someone who will still look to care and be protective of the country you’ve migrated to? I would assume it’s the later.

Don’t mistake Nationalism for fascism. The only reason why nationalism is labelled as such is because fascists use the term nationalism to describe their hateful intentions. Though it is true that they are practicing nationalism, they are practicing it extremely and in an unhealthy manner. Going back, nationalism is more on loving and preserving your own culture. Take for example. a dying culture in a certain region because of modernization. This is not to imply that you hate modernization, but rather, you want to preserve their culture by letting other people know, even if they are modernized already.

Recently non-Scots who classed as ‘nationalists’ and even ‘Nazis’ the Scots who voted ‘Yes’ during Scotland’s failed latest attempt to gain independence will have chosen to ignore that Brexit shows that they are no different from said Scots. Give a man enough rope and he’ll hang himself. Let him talk for long enough and his tongue will replace the rope.

There were really only two sides to that referendum: Scottish nationalists/separatists vs British nationalists/loyalists.

Overall good Analysis -but dont agree with the Summary Part – Patriot can fight for independence as it happend in India – The Nationalist’s stayed away from the Independence movement while the Patriots like Gandhi fought for freedom –

“Indian nationalism refers to the many underlying forces that defined the principles of the Indian independence movement, and strongly continue to influence the politics of India” from the page “Indian nationalism” on Wiki. If you’re a nationalist towards India it’d be self-contradictory to support British occupation, that would make you a loyalist. A nationalist response is more along the lines of what Gandhi or Infantry Regiment 950 did.

who wrote this article defining a patriot as someone who expresses love toward his country in a passive way:

Tell that to Paul Revere and the millions of Americans who died for this country considering it the greatest country on Earth.

I’m a patriot and I love this country… that makes me a nationalist. I also happen to be white so that makes me a white nationalist… OMG!

Leftist commucrats and globalists (like the writer of this article) are trying to make nationalism a pejorative… a dirty word. They’re trying to subtly replace the term “white supremacy” with “white nationalism.”

Going on this article, I am a patriot and not a nationalist because I seek to better our nation by addressing and correcting its flaws and to progress to a more just and equal nation rather than blindly supporting it without questioning it.

Remind me to never get stuck in a foxhole with you, Mr. Question Man Commucrat. Nationalists don’t blindly support anything, but if you don’t have a country what DO you have, genius? What you should question instead of your country is why the hell you’re still living here if you don’t support your country. There’s no difference in being a patriot and a nationalist. Like I already said. The leftist lunatic globalists want to make it a dirty word to believe in nationalism. Get an education, pal.

This article is full of gross generalizations. I did however like the first definition provided for Patriotism and Nationalism. I’ll focus my comment on Nationalism for now, as it appears to be the most controversial. First, what defines a nation is contested. Thus, the same issue applies to a greater degree for nationalism. Nationalism can be Rightwing, Leftwing, centrist, traditionalist, and perhaps in many more forms. Let us take the Fascist Nationalism of Benito Mussolini as a case study. In this context Nationalism is defined by violence and imperialism. Let us take the Nationalism of India for a contrast. Indian nationalism of the 30s-40s aimed to liberate India. Nehru’s Indian nationalism was statist, Gandhi’s was rural/village centric, Savarkar was culture centered, Sardar Patel’s was tradition centered, and so on. In fact Nationalism is a normal part of discourse in India. There is moderate, extreme, and other forms of nationalism in India. Even many communists in India profess nationalism (some as deceit for votes and support while others, rarely, genuinely are nationalistic). Nelson Mandela was a Nationalist who opposed apartheid. Hitler was a Nazi nationalist who used it to promote racism and genocide. There was Bismark, who through realism, sought to establish a German state, which is an example of nationalism. It is a shame that many on this comment section have become militant in their support and opposition to this very broad and undefined category. Nationalism isn’t like Capitalism, Marxism, Islam, Christianity, etc. It is a word with fluid meaning. It is diverse and undefined. It grows shrinks and so on.

My po*p smells help, i think it may be because I’m a nationalist what should i do

yo i agree you bugging homie

Your definitions and distinctions were helpful, but I object to your calling patriotism passive. Patriotism – love of the fatherland – inspires actions that benefit the nation and its inhabitants.

Love is to patriotism as Pride is to nationalism.

Clarification

This is totally wrong. There is nothing in nationalism that implies the notion that once own nation/people would be superior to any other nation. I would say that that notion rather is linked to patriotism, as patriotism is artificial.

Nationalism is based on the notion that kinship gives affinity, a notion everyone know is true. Patriotism is based on the notion that a set of beliefs could replace kinship bonds, something that is practically impossible to do. Where nationalism and an nation state (e.g. the old Sweden) can lead to a harmonic society that don’t feel the need to overcome internal strifes by waging wars on other countries, a patriotic country often does not.

A patriotic country on the other hand can consist of several different peoples that tries to overcome their cultural differences and different background through a artificial set of beliefs that everyone is supposed to abide too. The US is a perfect example of a patriotic country that has waged war on country after country to cover up the fact that it is an artificial country with grave internal contradictions between people that are not related to each other, doesn’t share a cultural background etc.

This is very annoying, I hate all of you.

Leave a Response

Name ( required )

Email ( required )

Please note: comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail

Written by : Prabhat S. and updated on 2018, February 26 Articles on DifferenceBetween.net are general information, and are not intended to substitute for professional advice. The information is "AS IS", "WITH ALL FAULTS". User assumes all risk of use, damage, or injury. You agree that we have no liability for any damages.

Advertisments

Top Difference Betweens

Get new comparisons in your inbox:, most emailed comparisons, editor's picks.

Difference Between MAC and IP Address
Difference Between Platinum and White Gold
Difference Between Civil and Criminal Law
Difference Between GRE and GMAT
Difference Between Immigrants and Refugees
Difference Between DNS and DHCP
Difference Between Computer Engineering and Computer Science
Difference Between Men and Women
Difference Between Book value and Market value
Difference Between Red and White wine
Difference Between Depreciation and Amortization
Difference Between Bank and Credit Union
Difference Between White Eggs and Brown Eggs

The Difference Between 'Patriotism' and 'Nationalism'

One of the many difficulties inherent in creating a dictionary that accurately reflects the language of any large group of people is that these people may not all view certain words and values as equal. Nationalism and patriotism present us with an appropriately problematic pair with which to illustrate this. Are these words synonymous? Is one an insult, and the other not? Can either of them mean different things to different people?

How does the speaker or writer define them?

Let’s take a few minutes to go over the respective histories of these two words to see where and when they shared meaning and in what senses they have drifted apart.

Patriotism is the older of the two words, with published written evidence dating back to the middle of the 17th century. Patriotism came from adding the suffix of - ism to the existing word patriot , which itself came into English from the French patriote , and may be traced back further to the Greek word patrios (“of one’s father”).

There is hardly any judicious man but knoweth, that it was neither learning, piety, nor patriotism that perswaded any of that Nation to Presbytery…. —C.N., Reasons Why the Supreme Authority of the Three Nations (for the time) is not in the Parliament , 1653 There hath been in London, and repairing to it, for these many yeers together, a knot of Scotish bankers, collybists, or coinecoursers, of traffickers in Merchandise to and againe, and of men of other professions, who…hug all unto themselves; that, for no respect of vertue, honor, kinred, patriotism, or whatever else…whereof those quomodocunquizing clusterfists and rapacious varlets have given of late such cannibal-like proofs, by their inhumanity and obdurate carriage towards some (whose shoos-strings they are not worthy to unty) that were it not that a more able pen then mine, will assuredly not faile to jerk them on all sides…. —Thomas Urquhart, Ekskybalauron , 1652

(Quick side note: the Urquhart citation above serves two purposes, being both our earliest written evidence of the word patriotism and a fine excuse for drawing the reader’s attention to the beautifully splenetic turn of phrase “quomodocunquizing clusterfists.” These two words are archaic enough to only be defined in the Oxford English Dictionary, which informs us that the former is “that makes money in any possible way,” and the latter is “a ‘close-fisted’ or grasping fellow.” Should you ever find yourself in need of an insult that is not hackneyed and stale we wholeheartedly recommend quomodocunquizing clusterfist . End of side note.)

We do not have any evidence of nationalism occurring until just before the 19th century, almost a hundred and fifty years after patriotism . And in its early use, from the end of the 18th century onward for a number of decades, nationalism appears to have been largely interchangeable with patriotism , with both words primarily being used to refer to a general love of one’s country.

Nationalism must involve the consecrated devotion of a responsive citizenship, sound policies must have universal faith and unsound vagaries must have universal condemnation. — The Marion County News (Hamilton, AL), 1 Jan. 1820 Modern France, instead of diminishing, has, if possible, encreased this nationalism . Removed from his oppression and atrocities, they see nothing but the magnificence, the success and the splendor of Bonaparte, and I assure you that every poor, ignorant, stupid Creole, when he hears of an achievement of this their Demi God, evinces a lively interest, an exultation as if some choice unlooked for gift of heaven had blessed his family. — Poulson’s American Daily Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA), 11 Oct. 1811 If there be not Conservatism, and Nationalism, and Patriotism enough in the North to rise up and overwhelm with numbers the spirit that points to the the election of anybody but Fremont (or of Fremont) as the prelude to civil war, we had better seek to save as much fratricidal blood as possible in a peaceable line of immediate separation. — New York Daily News , 1 Jul. 1856

A somewhat subtler difference between the two words may be found in their modifiers and the ideas to which each is connected. When we examine large bodies of recent text we see that patriotism is more often used in a general sense, often in conjunction with such words as bravery , valor , duty , and devotion . Nationalism , however, tends to find itself modified by specific movements, most frequently of a political bent.

In one respect, the insanities of 1947 are reverberating now with growing Hindu nationalism in a professedly secular India. – Kashmir Monitor , 14 Aug. 2017 Today, more than two decades into a democratic South Africa, Afrikaner nationalism has been severely diminished and along with it the standing of Afrikaans in the public sector. — The New Age (Johannesburg, South Africa), 2 May 2017 Canadian Nationalism emerged 150 years ago, and has always been defended and protected not only by the spoken word but also, if required, by a dedicated military. —Rosie Sanchez, Prairie Post East (Swift Current, Sask.), 7 Jul 2017 Founded in 2014—two years after Burma experienced religiously motivated riots largely targeting the Muslim minority—and now with sub-chapters across the country, Ma Ba Tha has become virtually synonymous with Buddhist nationalism. — Asia News Monitor (Bangkok), 7 Jul. 2017 Over the last few years, however, a strong contender in the form of Tamil nationalism has emerged because Tamil Nadu got into river water disputes with all the neighbouring states and the neighbours did not seem to care much for Dravidian niceties although Telugus, Kannadigas and Malayalis are putatively Dravidian. — The Times of India (New Delhi), 4 Mar. 2017 His defeat by Plaid Cymru’s Gwynfor Evans at Carmarthen in 1966 stemmed not from any upsurge in Welsh nationalism, but rather a sudden deterioration in the fortunes of Harold Wilson’s government. — The Telegraph (London, UK), 5 Apr. 2017

So now that we’ve briefly looked over the history of patriotism and nationalism can we draw any firm conclusions about whether one or the other is pejorative? The answer is: it depends. It seems certain that, at least with nationalism , it may mean different things to different people. Of the six different kinds of X nationalism cited just above, it is likely that most people would find some politically questionable, and others not. Patriotism is rarely used in these contexts.

In U.S. usage nationalism is now perhaps most frequently associated with white nationalism , and has considerably negative connotations.

Some of us imagined that we dented the nationalism, hatred and racism that roiled the world in the first half of the 20th century. —Jeanette Friedman-Sieradski (letter to editor), The Times-Tribune (Scranton, PA), 12 Mar. 2017 And while coded appeals to racism or nationalism aren’t new—two words: Southern strategy—overt calls to temporarily bar Muslims from entry to the United States or questioning a federal judge’s impartiality based on his Mexican heritage are new. —Jim Rutenberg, The New York Times , 8 Aug. 2016

As a dictionary, we must weigh all matters of semantic and regional difference. Therefore we can offer no firm guidance as to whether or not nationalism qualifies as an insult across the board. We can, however, advocate for the revival of the tradition of insult with precision.

May we again recommend quomodocunquizing clusterfist ?

Word of the Day

Clandestine.

See Definitions and Examples »

Get Word of the Day daily email!

Games & Quizzes

Play Quordle: Guess all four words in a limited number of tries. Each of your guesses must be a real 5-letter word.

Commonly Confused

'canceled' or 'cancelled', 'virus' vs. 'bacteria', your vs. you're: how to use them correctly, is it 'jail' or 'prison', 'deduction' vs. 'induction' vs. 'abduction', grammar & usage, more words you always have to look up, 'fewer' and 'less', 7 pairs of commonly confused words, plural and possessive names: a guide, more commonly misspelled words, pilfer: how to play and win, great big list of beautiful and useless words, vol. 4, 9 other words for beautiful, 8 words for lesser-known musical instruments, birds say the darndest things.

IAS Preparation
Difference Between Articles

Difference between Nationalism and Patriotism

Difference between Nationalism and Patriotism is explained here in detail. The difference between nationalism and patriotism is that the patriot is proud of his country for what it does, and the nationalist is proud of his country no matter what it does.The difference between Nationalism vs Patriotism given here can help the UPSC Civil Service exam aspirants to understand the basics better and know their comparisons thoroughly.

Aspirants would find this article very helpful while preparing for the IAS Exam .

Difference between Nationalism and Patriotism – UPSC Notes:- Download PDF Here

The differences between Nationalism and Patriotism are:


Nationalism involves National Identity	Patriotism involves social conditioning and personal opinions
Nationalism is little aggressive by nature	Patriotism is little passive by nature
In Nationalism people consider their nation as superior to other nations	In Patriotism, all nations are considered as equals.
Nationalism unites people against a foreign hostile nation, it unites people against a common enemy.	Patriotism unites people for the overall well being and prosperity of the nation.
In Nationalism the sentiments are more inclined towards sentiments and aggression towards other nations.	In Patriotism, the sentiments are more inclined towards the idea of peaceful coexistence between nations.
Under concept of Nationalism, people find it hard to accept criticism towards one’s nation and considers it as humiliation or an insult	Under Patriotism, there is more tolerance towards criticism and tries to incorporate improvements and changes for the better.
Nationalism gives more emphasis on the heritage, culture and language of a Nation	Patriotism gives more emphasis on the values and beliefs of a nation.
Nationalism tries to find justifications for the mistakes done in the past.	Patriotism does not try to justify mistakes rather they try to understand the shortcomings and make improvements accordingly.

These are the main differences between Nationalism and Patriotism.The differences given in the above table can help the UPSC Civil Service Exam aspirants to answer any related questions easily in the exams.

After learning about the Nationalism and Patriotism difference, it is better to know the details of Political Science and International Relations syllabus, optional books and the strategies for UPSC Civil Service Exam. Visit the below-given links to learn about Causes of Indian National Movement, Moderate phase of Indian National Movement, Extremist Period of Indian National Movement in detail, along with other information. Also refer the links given below, for NCERT Notes on Modern Indian History, Medieval Indian History and Ancient Indian History. Also refer to the links of Sociology syllabus for UPSC Civil Service Exam and understand the differences between Political Science and Sociology.

Political Science and International Relations Optional – Syllabus for UPSC Mains Exam
Political Science and International Relations – Strategy, Book List etc
NCERT Notes: Moderate Phase of Indian National Movement
NCERT Notes: Causes of Indian National Movement
NCERT Notes: Indian National Movement – Extremist Period
NCERT Notes: Revolutionary Movement in Indian Freedom Struggle
NCERT Notes – Modern Indian History
NCERT Notes – Ancient Indian History
NCERT Notes – Medieval Indian History
Sociology Syllabus for UPSC Exam
Difference between Sociology and Political Science
Complete List of Difference between Articles – History, Polity, Economics, Geography and more

The above details would help candidates prepare for UPSC 2024 .

Frequently Asked Questions on Difference between Nationalism and Patriotism

Q 1. what is the main difference between nationalism and patriotism, q 2. are patriotism and nationalism synonyms.

IAS 2024 - Your dream can come true!

Download the ultimate guide to upsc cse preparation, register with byju's & download free pdfs, register with byju's & watch live videos.

Essay on Nationalism And Patriotism

Students are often asked to write an essay on Nationalism And Patriotism in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.

Let’s take a look…

100 Words Essay on Nationalism And Patriotism

Understanding nationalism and patriotism.

Nationalism means loving your country and wanting it to be independent and strong. It’s like being part of a big family and working together for your home’s success. People who are nationalists often feel proud of their country’s history and culture.

The Good Side of Patriotism

When nationalism goes too far.

Sometimes, nationalism can lead to thinking your country is better than others, which can cause arguments or even fights. It’s important to love your country but also to respect other countries and their people.

Patriotism Brings People Together

Patriotism can bring people together, like celebrating Independence Day with fireworks. It’s about sharing love for your country with friends and family, and helping each other in tough times.

250 Words Essay on Nationalism And Patriotism

The good side.

Patriotism can bring people together. When citizens are patriotic, they work to make their country a better place. They follow laws, help others, and vote in elections. Nationalism can also do good by making people strive to improve their country and be the best it can be. This can lead to advances in science, culture, and sports.

The Challenges

Sometimes nationalism can lead to thinking one’s country is better than others in a way that causes conflict. It can make people treat those from other countries poorly, which is not fair or right. Patriotism can also be tricky if it means people ignore problems in their own country.

Balance is Key

It is important to find a balance. Loving one’s country is good, but it should not lead to looking down on others. We can be proud of where we come from and still respect and learn from different countries and cultures. This balance helps make the world a friendly and peaceful place.

500 Words Essay on Nationalism And Patriotism

Nationalism and patriotism are two words that often come up when people talk about their love for their country. At first glance, they seem like the same thing, but they have different meanings and ways of showing love for one’s homeland.

What is Patriotism?

Patriotism is the feeling of love and devotion to one’s country. It’s like the bond you have with your family. You care about them and will stand by them because they are important to you. Patriots show their love for their country by celebrating national holidays, respecting their country’s symbols like the flag, and being proud of their homeland’s achievements. They also respect other people’s love for their own countries.

What is Nationalism?

Differences between nationalism and patriotism.

The main difference is how they view other countries. Patriots can love their country without feeling the need to compare it to others or put it above them. Nationalists often feel their country is superior and should be the most important. This can sometimes lead to not getting along with other countries.

Why They Matter

Both patriotism and nationalism are important because they help unite people within a country. They give a sense of belonging and a reason to support one another. For example, during sports events like the Olympics, the feelings of patriotism bring people together to cheer for their athletes.

The Good and The Bad

Patriotism and nationalism can be good when they encourage people to help their country and each other. They can lead to great things like people working together to improve their country. But there can be a downside. If nationalism becomes too strong, it can make people dislike those from other countries or lead to unfair treatment of others.

Finding a Balance

Nationalism and patriotism are like two sides of the same coin. They both involve feelings for one’s country, but they express these feelings in different ways. Patriotism is about loving your country and being proud of it, while nationalism is about wanting your country to be the best and most powerful. Both can bring people together, but it’s key to love your country without forgetting to respect other countries and their people. This way, we can all share our pride and work towards a peaceful world.

That’s it! I hope the essay helped you.

Apart from these, you can look at all the essays by clicking here .

Happy studying!

difference between nationalism and patriotism essay brainly

IMAGES

VIDEO

COMMENTS

IAS General Studies Notes Links

Nationalism vs Patriotism – Differences and Similarities

Table of Differences: Nationalism vs Patriotism

What is Nationalism?

What is Patriotism?

Nationalism vs Supranationalism

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

What Is Patriotism? Definition, Examples, Pros and Cons

Key Takeaways

Patriotism Definition

Historic Perspective

Examples of Patriotism

Patriotism vs. Nationalism

Pros and Cons of Patriotism

Patriotism vs. Nationalism: What’s The Difference?

What is the difference between patriotism and nationalism ?

How to use patriotism vs. nationalism

What is the difference between nationalism and patriotism?

Disclosure statement

Devotion to a people

Devotion to a place

Nationalism vs. patriotism

Stephen Knight Lecturer in Medieval Literature

Postdoctoral Research Fellowship

Social Media Producer

Dean (Head of School), Indigenous Knowledges

Senior Research Fellow - Curtin Institute for Energy Transition (CIET)

Patriotism vs. Nationalism: Understanding the Key Differences

What is Patriotism?

Historical Context

What is Nationalism?

Patriotism vs. Nationalism: Examples in Society

Examples of Nationalism

Patriotism vs. Nationalism : A Comparative Analysis

Impact on Society

Role in Politics

Implications of Patriotism and Nationalism

Effect on Domestic Policies

Frequently Asked Questions

Difference Between Nationalism and Patriotism

Search DifferenceBetween.net :

95 Comments

Leave a Response

Advertisments

More in 'Language'

More in 'Politics'

Top Difference Betweens

The Difference Between 'Patriotism' and 'Nationalism'

Word of the Day

Games & Quizzes

Commonly Confused

Difference between Nationalism and Patriotism

Difference between Nationalism and Patriotism – UPSC Notes:- Download PDF Here

Frequently Asked Questions on Difference between Nationalism and Patriotism

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

IAS 2024 - Your dream can come true!

Essay on Nationalism And Patriotism

100 Words Essay on Nationalism And Patriotism

The Good Side of Patriotism

Patriotism Brings People Together

250 Words Essay on Nationalism And Patriotism

The Challenges

Balance is Key

500 Words Essay on Nationalism And Patriotism

What is Patriotism?

What is Nationalism?

Why They Matter

The Good and The Bad

Finding a Balance

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

IMAGES

VIDEO

COMMENTS