Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .
Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
The Nature of Critical Thinking: An Outline of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities i
Related Papers
Sugih Pamungkas
Sabina Saldanha
Anales de Psicologia
Ana Mª Nieto
Critical thinking includes the component skills of analyzing arguments, making inferences using inductive or deductive reasoning, judging or evaluating, and making decisions or solving problems. Background knowledge is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for enabling critical thought within a given subject. Critical thinking involves both cognitive skills and dispositions. These dispositions, which can be seen as attitudes or habits of mind, include openand fair-mindedness, inquisitiveness, flexibility, a propensity to seek reason, a desire to be wellinformed, and a respect for and willingness to entertain diverse viewpoints. There are both general-and domain-specific aspects of critical thinking. Empirical research suggests that people begin developing critical thinking competencies at a very young age. Although adults often exhibit deficient reasoning, in theory all people can be taught to think critically. Instructors are urged to provide explicit instruction in critical t...
Medical Education
David Hatem
Khánh Linh Nguyễn
Daniel Strauss
Before criticism is justified, an account of the applicable criteria should be given. This task concerns first of all the well-known logical principles of identity, contradiction and the excluded middle. They connect critical thinking to the conceptual element of rationality and to the normed nature of logical thinking, manifest in logically sound (norm-conformative) thinking and antinormative thinking—briefly also accounting for the dialectical tradition. An analysis of these principles requires an understanding of the uniqueness of, and coherence between, the logical and non-logical aspects in the light of contraries like logical-illogical, polite-impolite and frugal-wasteful. It also questions the idea of autonomy and examines the switch from principles to values. When a school of thought does not accept all the logical principles, the criteria for scientific thinking are challenged, for example in intuitionistic logic which rejects the universal validity of the principle of the excluded middle. It is then argued that the principle of sufficient reason and that of the excluded antinomy points at a more than logical foundation for critical thinking and ultimately calls for a non-reductionist ontology.
Jonathan Heard
RELATED PAPERS
res publication
accounts ziraf
Unity, Truth and the Liar
Catarina Dutilh Novaes
Proceedings of the First Joint BMES/EMBS Conference. 1999 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 21st Annual Conference and the 1999 Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society (Cat. No.99CH37015)
John Taylor
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Christophe Raynaud
Cadernos de Psicologia Social do Trabalho
Selma Lancman
13TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON AERONAUTICS, AUTOMOTIVE AND RAILWAY ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGIES (BulTrans-2021)
Pavel Prosuntsov
Mark A Prelas
Ibrahim Hossain
Biological Psychology
Helena Moraes
Everton Cardoso
Alexandre Garcia Aguado
Annals of Translational Medicine
George Muschler
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
International Journal of Coal Geology
Ivana Sýkorová
Julie Gershunskaya
American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
Vishnu Prasad
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics
Yalcin Baran
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
- Find new research papers in:
- Health Sciences
- Earth Sciences
- Cognitive Science
- Mathematics
- Computer Science
- Academia ©2024
Critical Thinking Dispositions: Their Nature and Assessability
- Robert H. Ennis
Developed By
- Français (Canada)
Information
- For Readers
- For Authors
- For Librarians
Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception
Cite this chapter.
- Robert H. Ennis
5681 Accesses
53 Citations
Critical thinking under that name was inspired by pragmatic philosopher John Dewey (1910) and endorsed by analytic philosopher Max Black (1946). Dewey was revered by the progressive educators, who re-labeled his “reflective thinking” as “critical thinking,” a name I believe they originated and that persists to the present (see Aiken (1942) for a mixture of both terms). Black (1946), insofar as I can determine, wrote the first college text including the words “critical thinking” in the title.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
- Available as PDF
- Read on any device
- Instant download
- Own it forever
- Available as EPUB and PDF
- Compact, lightweight edition
- Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
- Free shipping worldwide - see info
- Durable hardcover edition
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Institutional subscriptions
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
On the Horizon: the Promise and Power of Higher Order, Critical, and Critical Analytical Thinking
The pros and cons of identifying critical thinking with system 2 processing, “here be dragons” mapping the realm of higher-order, critical, and critical-analytic thinking.
Aiken, W. M. 1942. The Story of the Eight-Year-Study . New York: Harper & Brothers. America 2000: An Education Strategy . 1991. Washington DC. http://www.scribd.com /doc/29278340/109-America-2000-An-Education-Strategy.
Google Scholar
Battersby, M. 2006. “Applied Epistemology and Argumentation in Epidemiology.” Informal Logic 26 (1): 41–62.
Black, M. 1946. Critical Thinking . New York: Prentice Hall.
Commission on the Humanities. 1980. The Humanities in American Life . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Dewey, J. 1910. How We Think . Boston: D. C. Heath.
Book Google Scholar
Ennis, R. H. 1964. “Operational Definitions.” American Educational Research Journal 1: 183–201.
Article Google Scholar
Ennis, R. H. 1968. “Enumerative Induction and Best Explanation.” The Journal of Philosophy 65: 523–530.
Ennis, R. H. 1969a. Logic in Teaching . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ennis, R. H. 1969b. Ordinary Logic . Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Ennis, R. H. 1973. “The Responsibility of a Cause.” In Philosophy of Education 1973 , edited by Brian Crittendo. Edwardsville, IL: Studies in Philosophy and Education. 86–93.
Ennis, R. H. 1974a. “The Believability of People.” Educational Forum 38: 347–354.
Ennis, R. H. 1974b. “Definition in Science Teaching.” Instructional Science 3: 285–298.
Ennis, R. H. 1975. “Children’s Ability to Handle Piaget’s Propositional Logic: A Conceptual Critique.” Review of Educational Research 45: 1–41.
Ennis, R. H. 1976. “An Alternative to Piaget’s Conceptualization of Logical Competence.” Child Development 47: 903–919.
Ennis, R. H. 1980. “Presidential Address: A Conception of Rational Thinking.” In Philosophy of Education 1979 , edited by Jerrold Coombs. Bloomington, IL: Philosophy of Education Society. 1–30.
Ennis, R. H. 1981. “A Conception of Deductive Logic Competence.” Teaching Philosophy 4: 337–385.
Ennis, R. H. 1982a. “Identifying Implicit Assumptions.” Synthese 51: 61–86.
Ennis, R. H. 1982b. “Mackie’s Singular Causality and Linked Overdetermination.” In Philosophy of Science Association 1982 , edited by Peter D. Asquith and Thomas Nickles. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association. 55–64.
Ennis, R. H. 1987. “A Taxonomy of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities.” In Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice , edited by J. B. Baron and R. J. Sternberg. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company. 9–26.
Ennis, R. H. 1989. “Critical Thinking and Subject Specificity: Clarification and Needed Research.” Educational Researcher 18 (3): 4–10.
Ennis, R. H. 1991. “Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception.” Teaching Philosophy 14 (1): 5–25.
Ennis, R. H. 1992. “John Mcpeck’s Teaching Critical Thinking.” Educational Studies 23 (4): 462–472.
Ennis, R. H. 1996a. Critical Thinking . Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ennis, R. H. 1996b. “Critical Thinking Dispositions: Their Nature and Assessability.” Informal Logic 18 (2 and 3): 165–182.
Ennis, R. H. 2001 “Argument Appraisal Strategy: A Comprehensive Approach.” Informal Logic 21 (2): 97–140.
Ennis, R. H. 2006. “Probably.” In Arguing on the Toulmin Model , edited by David Hitchcock and Bart Verheij. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. 145–164.
Chapter Google Scholar
Ennis, R. H. 2007. “‘Probable’ and Its Equivalents.” In Reason Reclaimed: Essays in Honor of J. Anthony Blair and Ralph Johnson , edited by Hans V. Hansen and Robert C. Pinto. Newport News, VA: Vale Press. 243–256.
Ennis, R. H. 2011. “Critical Thinking: Reflection and Perspective, Part I.” Inquiry: Critical Thinking across the Disciplines 26 (1): 4–18.
Ennis, R. H. 2012. Analyzing and Defending Sole Singular Causal Claims. Paper presented at Biennial meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, November 15–17, at San Diego, CA.
Ennis, R. H. 2013a. “Critical Thinking across the Curriculum: The Wisdom CTAC Program.” Inquiry: Critical Thinking across the Disciplines 28 (2): 25–52.
Ennis, R. H. 2013b. The Nature of Critical Thinking (under “What Is Critical Thinking?”). Available from http://criticalthinking.net .
Follesdal, D. 1979. “Hermeneutics and the Hypothetico-Deductive Method.” Dialectica 33 (3/4): 319–336
Harman, G. 1965 (January). “The Inference to Best Explanation.” The Philosophical Review 74 (1): 88–95.
Harman, G. H. 1968. “Enumerative Induction as Inference to Best Explanation.” The Journal of Philosophy 65 (18): 529–533.
Harman, G. 1973. Thought . Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Harmon, H. 1980. Executive Order No. 338. Long Beach, CA: The California State University and Colleges.
Hitchcock, D. 1980. “Deductive and Inductive: Types of Validity, Not Types of Argument.” Informal Logic Newsletter 2 (3): 9–11.
Hitchcock, D. 1985. “Enthymematic Arguments.” Informal Logic 7 (2 and 3): 83–97.
Lipton, P. 2004. Inference to Best Explanation (second edition). London: Routledge.
McPeck, J. 1990. Teaching Critical Thinking: Dialogue and Dialectic . New York: Routledge.
Norris, S., and Ennis, R. H. 1989. Evaluating Critical Thinking . Pacific Grove, CA: Midwest Publications.
Norris, S. P., and King, R. 1984. “Observation Ability: Determining and Extending Its Presence.” Informal Logic 6 (3): 3–9.
Obama, B. State of the Union 2014 Speech 2014. Available from http://www.whitehouse.gov /the-press-office/2014/01/28/president-barack-obamas-state-union-address.
Paul, R. 2012. Critical Thinking: What Every Person Needs to Survive in a Rapidly Changing World . Anthology ed. Santa Rosa: The Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Roth, M. 2010. “Beyond Critical Thinking.” The Chronicle of Higher Education , January 3.
Skyrms, B. 1966. Choice and Chance . Belmont, CA: Dickenson.
Download references
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Editor information
Copyright information.
© 2015 Martin Davies and Ronald Barnett
About this chapter
Ennis, R.H. (2015). Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception. In: Davies, M., Barnett, R. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_2
Download citation
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_2
Publisher Name : Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN : 978-1-349-47812-5
Online ISBN : 978-1-137-37805-7
eBook Packages : Palgrave Education Collection Education (R0)
Share this chapter
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Publish with us
Policies and ethics
- Find a journal
- Track your research
COMMENTS
A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. Citation. Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 9-26). W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.
Robert H. Ennis ([email protected]) Critical thinking is reasonable and reflective thinking focused on deciding what to believe or do. This definition I believe captures the core of the way the term is used in the critical thinking movement. In deciding what to believe or do, one is helped by the employment of a set of critical thinking ...
6 This is a revised version of the 1989 paper, Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research.) Ennis, R.H. (1991a).
The claim that critical thinking is subject specific appears, to be of practical importance and theoretical interest. Its meaning is unclear, however, and discussions of its are often confusing and at cross purposes. In an attempt to clarify the topic, Ennis offers a number of distinctions, including a distinction among three versions of ...
Ennis, Robert H. (1991b). An elaboration of a cardinal goal of science instruction: Scientific thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 23 (1), 31-45. Ennis, Robert H. (1991c). Critical thinking: A streamlined conception. Teaching Philosophy, 14 (1), 5-25. Ennis, Robert H. (1987a). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities.
Grading takes us about 5 minutes per essay for essay to assess critical thinking can vary consider- essays written in 40 minutes of class time. ably in degree of structure. The Ennis-Weir Critical Thinking Essay Test is an example of a highly struc- Performance Assessment. tured essay test.
Assuming that critical thinking dispositions are at least as important as critical thinking abilities, Ennis examines the concept of critical thinking disposition and suggests some criteria for judging sets of them. He considers a leading approach to their analysis and offers as an alternative a simpler set, including the disposition to seek alternatives and be open to them. After examining ...
A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilitities. Robert H. Ennis. Published 1987. Education, Philosophy, Psychology. No Paper Link Available. Save to Library. Create Alert.
Ennis' taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities 152 Lipman's three modes of thinking and four main varieties of cognitive skill 157 Paul's model of critical thinking 164 Jewell's reasoning taxonomy for gifted children 170 Petty's six-phase model of the creative process 174
Critical thinking comprises the mental processes, strategies, and representations people use to solve problems, make decisions, and learn new concepts. The study of critical thinking combines the educational, philosophical, and psychological traditions of thought. R. Ennis offers a philosophical taxonomy suggesting that critical thinking results from the interaction of a set of dispositions ...
Higher-Order Thinking Skills and Bloom's Taxonomy How does critical thinking compare with higher-order thinking and Bloom's taxonomy5 If these latter two approach es could do the job for us. there would be less reason to be interested in critical thinking As I have defined it and will be conceptuali/.ing it. critical thinking is a
TL;DR: The developmental model of critical thinking outlined in this article derives from contemporary empirical research on directions and processes of intellectual development in children and adolescents, and identifies three forms of second-order cognition (meta-knowing) that constitute an essential part of what develops cognitively to make critical thinking possible.
As such, the first step to understanding critical thinking requires us to develop an operationalized taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions. ... 7 Ennis, 'Critical Thinking' 37. 8 8 Groopman, J., How Doctors Think (New York: Mariner Books, 2007), 24Google Scholar. 9
Several well-known authors have developed definitions of critical thinking. Ennis (1987) bases his definition on five key ideas: "practical, reflective, reasonable, belief, and action" (p. 10), resulting in a working ... Ennis (1987) has designed a taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. He lists 12 abilities that ...
Ennis, Robert H. (1991b). An elaboration of a cardinal goal of science instruction: Scientific thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 23 (1), 31-45. Ennis, Robert H. (1991c). Critical thinking: A streamlined conception. Teaching Philosophy, 14 (1), 5-25. Ennis, Robert H. (1987a). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities.
gathered empirical evidence supporting the distinction between critical thinking dis positions and abilities. Taube did a confirmational factor analysis of an open-ended critical thinking test, The Ennis-Weir Critical Thinking Essay Test (Ennis & Weir, 1985), together with some separate tests of critical thinking dispositions and abili
means and to determine whether to based in a large part upon a study. accept or reject it, we would be en of the literature in education, philos gaged in thinking which, for lack of ophy, and psychology.*. The list of. aa better term, we shall call critical critical thinking aspects is also based. thinking."
Science education has long accepted that critical thinking should be a focus in instruction. The National Science Education Standards (see also) advocate the use of inquiry (see also) which demands critical thinking if it is be applied effectively. ... Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. Baron ...
Ennis, R. H. 1987. "A Taxonomy of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities." In Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice, edited by J. Baron and R. Sternberg. New York: Freeman. Google Scholar Ennis, R. H. 1992. "The Degree to Which Critical Thinking Is Subject Specific: Clarification and Needed Research."
Assuming that critical thinking dispositions are at least as important as critical thinking abilities, Ennis examines the concept of critical thinking disposition and suggests some criteria for judging sets of them. He considers a leading approach to their analysis and offers as an alternative a simpler set, including the disposition to seek alternatives and be open to them.
Ennis (1962) defined critical thinking as "the correct assess ing of statements" (p. 83). Lipman (1988) stated that critical think ... Dick (1991) suggested a taxonomy of 15 critical thinking skills organized into five categories: identifying arguments, ana lyzing arguments, external sources, scientific analytical reasoning,
Abstract. Critical thinking under that name was inspired by pragmatic philosopher John Dewey (1910) and endorsed by analytic philosopher Max Black (1946). Dewey was revered by the progressive educators, who re-labeled his "reflective thinking" as "critical thinking," a name I believe they originated and that persists to the present (see ...