effects of social media on students' academic performance thesis

Effects of Social Media on Academic Performance of High School Students under Pandemic (COVID-19) Situations

8 Pages Posted: 9 Mar 2021

Jurena Abrenica

Central Luzon State University

Marife De Torres

Danilo vargas.

Date Written: March 8, 2021

This study is entitled, “Effects of Social Media on Academic Performance of Don Ramon E. Costales Memorial National High School Students.” The study was conducted at Don Ramon E. Costales Memorial National High School in Villasis, Pangasinan.The Philippines This study aimed to determine the extent of students’ utilization of social networking sites, their reasons for using social media, and their social media preference. it also tried to explore how the different variables such as sex, age, religion, grade level, type of social networking sites, and the number of hours spent in studying affect the extent of their social media usage. Cooperation with the institution was done to administer the survey questionnaires. Binary logistic regression analysis and descriptive methods were used. Findings reveal that majority of the students used Facebook to communicate with their friends and relatives followed by Instagram. The students were using social media daily for 1-5 hours. The only variable that affected the extent of utilization of social media was the respondents’ gender. With 0.87, females were two times more exposed to social media rather than males. The study concludes that females are more exposed to social media rather than males. The use of social media by females has to do with their desire to communicate or share more personal information, revealing more about their personal lives. They use social networking sites to make connections and stay in touch with family or friends. Men, by contrast, use social media to gather the information they need to build influence. Facebook is the most preferred social networking site for students to connect with family and friends. They are entertained by Facebook. They use a long time chatting with friends rather than doing school works. Facebook becomes their daily routine. The study recommends for other researchers who wish to do a similar study, employ other variables which are not tested in the study to find other factors that affect the extent of social media usage of the students.

Keywords: : Effects, Social Media, Academic Performance, High School Students

Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation

Central Luzon State University ( email )

Barangay Bantug Science City of Munoz Science City of Muñoz, Nueva Ecija 3119 Philippines 3121 (Fax)

Danilo Vargas (Contact Author)

Science City of Munoz Science City of Munoz Science City Of Munoz, Nueva Ecija 3121 Philippines 3121 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics, related ejournals, sociology of education ejournal.

Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic

Communication & Technology eJournal

Educational & instructional communication ejournal, psychology research methods ejournal, digital health ejournal, educational & school psychology ejournal, sociology of media & technology ejournal, medical & mental health sociology ejournal.

Exploring the influence of excessive social media use on academic performance through media multitasking and attention problems: a three-dimension usage perspective

• Published: 07 June 2024

Cite this article

• Weiyi Sun 1 &
• Miao Chao   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6286-5857 1 , 2 , 3  

Explore all metrics

The use of social media among students has gained significant attention due to its potential impact on academic performance, characterized by both positive and negative effects. However, limited research exists regarding the different types of excessive social media use and their influence on academic performance. In this innovative study, we aim to differentiate excessive social, hedonic and cognitive use of social media and investigate the mediating role of media multitasking and attention problems in predicting academic performance. The survey data from 887 high school students were analyzed using PLS-SEM techniques. The results revealed that both excessive social and hedonic media usages were positively associated with media multitasking, but excessive cognitive use had a negative impact on media multitasking. This tendency to engage in multitasking was found to be linked to attention problems, which ultimately led to decreased academic performance. These findings highlight the potential pitfalls of excessive social media use, encouraging students to focus on a single task can help mitigate the negative effects associated with social media use. These findings emphasize the risks of excessive social media use and the benefits of concentrating on singular tasks. Moreover, they enrich our understanding of students’ social media usage types and underscore the importance of fostering more productive digital habits, ultimately bolstering academic achievements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Efficient, helpful, or distracting? A literature review of media multitasking in relation to academic performance

Mindfulness and growth mindset as protective factors for the impact of media multitasking on academic performance: The mediating role of self-control

Cognitive Control in Adolescents and Young Adults with Media Multitasking Experience: a Three-Level Meta-analysis

Data availability.

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbas, J., Aman, J., Nurunnabi, M., & Bano, S. (2019). The Impact of Social Media on Learning Behavior for Sustainable Education: Evidence of students from selected universities in Pakistan. Sustainability , 11 (6), 1683. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061683

Article   Google Scholar  

Abbas, J., Zhang, Q., Hussain, I., Akram, S., Afaq, A., & Shad, M. A. (2020). Sustainable Innovation in Small Medium enterprises: The Impact of Knowledge Management on Organizational Innovation through a mediation analysis by using SEM Approach. Sustainability , 12 (6), 2407. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062407

Abbas, J., Rehman, S., Aldereai, O., Al-Sulaiti, K. I., & Shah, S. A. R. (2023). Tourism management in financial crisis and industry 4.0 effects: Managers traits for technology adoption in reshaping, and reinventing human management systems. Human Systems Management , 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-230067

Al-Rahmi, A. M., Shamsuddin, A., Alturki, U., Aldraiweesh, A., Yusof, F. M., Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Aljeraiwi, A. A. (2021). The influence of Information System Success and Technology Acceptance Model on Social Media Factors in Education. Sustainability , 13 (14), 7770. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147770

Albulescu, P., Macsinga, I., Rusu, A., Sulea, C., Bodnaru, A., & Tulbure, B. T. (2022). 《Give me a break!》 A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of micro-breaks for increasing well-being and performance. PLOS ONE , 17 (8), e0272460. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272460

Alhabash, S., Chiang, Y., & Huang, K. (2014). MAM & U&G in Taiwan: Differences in the uses and gratifications of Facebook as a function of motivational reactivity. Computers in Human Behavior , 35 , 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.033

Ali, M., Yaacob, R. A. I. B. R., Al-Amin Bin Endut, M. N., & Langove, N. U. (2017). Strengthening the academic usage of social media: An exploratory study. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences , 29 (4), 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2016.10.002

Andreassen, C. S. (2015). Online Social Network Site Addiction: A Comprehensive Review. Current Addiction Reports , 2 (2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-015-0056-9

Azadi, N. A., Ziapour, A., Lebni, J. Y., Irandoost, S. F., Abbas, J., & Chaboksavar, F. (2021). The effect of education based on health belief model on promoting preventive behaviors of hypertensive disease in staff of the Iran University of Medical Sciences. Archives of Public Health , 79 (1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-021-00594-4

Barkley, R. A., Fischer, M., Smallish, L., & Fletcher, K. (2006). Young adult outcome of hyperactive children: Adaptive functioning in Major Life activities. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry , 45 (2), 192–202. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.chi.0000189134.97436.e2

Barta, S., Belanche, D., Fernández, A., & Flavián, M. (2023). Influencer marketing on TikTok: The effectiveness of humor and followers’ hedonic experience. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services , 70 , 103149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103149

Basoglu, K. A., Fuller, M. A., & Sweeney, J. T. (2009). Investigating the effects of computer mediated interruptions: An analysis of task characteristics and interruption frequency on financial performance. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems , 10 (4), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2009.10.003

Berdida, D. J. E., & Grande, R. A. N. (2023). Nursing students’ nomophobia, social media use, attention, motivation, and academic performance: A structural equation modeling approach. Nurse Education in Practice , 70 , 103645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103645

Billedo, C. J., Kerkhof, P., & Finkenauer, C. (2015). The Use of Social networking sites for Relationship maintenance in Long-Distance and geographically close romantic relationships. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking , 18 (3), 152–157. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0469

Boer, M., Stevens, G., Finkenauer, C., & Eijnden, R. (2020). Attention deficit hyperactivity Disorder-Symptoms, Social Media Use Intensity, and social media use problems in adolescents: Investigating directionality. Child Development , 91 (4). https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13334

Boucher, L., Palmeri, T. J., Logan, G. D., & Schall, J. D. (2007). Inhibitory control in mind and brain: An interactive race model of countermanding saccades. Psychological Review , 114 (2), 376–397. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.376

Brailovskaia, J., Schillack, H., & Margraf, J. (2020). Tell me why are you using social media (SM)! Relationship between reasons for use of SM, SM flow, daily stress, depression, anxiety, and addictive SM use – an exploratory investigation of young adults in Germany. Computers in Human Behavior , 113 , 106511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106511

Brooks, S. (2015). Does personal social media usage affect efficiency and well-being? Computers in Human Behavior , 46 , 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.053

Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and Programming . Routledge.

Cao, X., & Yu, L. (2019). Exploring the influence of excessive social media use at work: A three-dimension usage perspective. International Journal of Information Management , 46 , 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.019

Castrén, S., Mustonen, T., Hylkilä, K., Männikkö, N., Kääriäinen, M., & Raitasalo, K. (2022). Risk factors for excessive Social Media Use Differ from those of Gambling and Gaming in Finnish Youth. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health , 19 (4), 2406. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042406

Chan, M. S., & Cheng, C. (2016). Explaining personality and contextual differences in beneficial role of online versus offline social support: A moderated mediation model. Computers in Human Behavior , 63 , 747–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.058

Chang, C. T., Tu, C. S., & Hajiyev, J. (2019). Integrating academic type of social media activity with perceived academic performance: A role of task-related and non-task-related compulsive internet use. Computers & Education , 139 , 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.011

Chen, M., & Peng, A. Y. (2022). Why do people choose different social media platforms linking Use Motives with Social Media affordances and personalities. Social Science Computer Review , 41 (2), 330–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211049120

Cheng, Y. S., & Cho, S. (2021). Are social media bad for your employees? Effects of at-work break activities on recovery experiences. International Journal of Hospitality Management , 96 , 102957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102957

Cheng, C., Wang, H., Sigerson, L., & Chau, C. (2019). Do the socially rich get richer? A nuanced perspective on social network site use and online social capital accrual. Psychological Bulletin , 145 (7), 734–764. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000198

Chu, T. H. (2020). A meta-analytic review of the relationship between social media use and employee outcomes. Telematics and Informatics , 50 , 101379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101379

Davis, R. A. (2001). A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological internet use. Computers in Human Behavior , 17 (2), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00041-8

Deng, L., Zhou, Y., & Hu, Q. (2022). Off-task social media multitasking during class: Determining factors and mediating mechanism. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education , 19 (1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00321-1

DeRonda, A., Zhao, Y., Seymour, K. E., Mostofsky, S. H., & Rosch, K. S. (2021). Distinct patterns of impaired cognitive control among boys and girls with ADHD Across Development. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology , 49 (7), 835–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-021-00792-2

Du, J., Van Koningsbruggen, G. M., & Kerkhof, P. (2018). A brief measure of social media self-control failure. Computers in Human Behavior , 84 , 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.002

Dunn, D. W., & Kronenberger, W. G. (2005). Childhood Epilepsy, attention problems, and ADHD: Review and practical considerations. Seminars in Pediatric Neurology , 12 (4), 222–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spen.2005.12.004

DuPaul, G. J., Gormley, M. J., Anastopoulos, A. D., Weyandt, L. L., Labban, J., Sass, A. J., Busch, C. Z., Franklin, M. K., & Postler, K. B. (2021). Academic trajectories of College students with and without ADHD: Predictors of four-year outcomes. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology , 50 (6), 828–843. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2020.1867990

Efron, D., Nicholson, J. M., Anderson, V., Silk, T., Ukoumunne, O. C., Gulenc, A., Hazell, P., Jongeling, B., & Sciberras, E. (2020). ADHD at Age 7 and functional impairments at Age 10. Pediatrics , 146 (5), e20201061. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-1061

Evers, K., Chen, S., Rothmann, S., Dhir, A., & Pallesen, S. (2020). Investigating the relation among disturbed sleep due to social media use, school burnout, and academic performance. Journal of Adolescence , 84 (1), 156–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.08.011

Fabio, R. A., & Urso, M. (2014). The analysis of attention network in ADHD, attention problems and typically developing subjects. Life Span and Disability , 17 (2), 199–221.

Google Scholar  

Feng, S., Wong, Y. K., Wong, L. Y., & Hossain, L. (2019). The internet and Facebook Usage on Academic Distraction of College Students. Computers & Education , 134 , 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.005

Fisher, J. T., Hopp, F. R., Chen, Y., & Weber, R. (2022). Uncovering the structure of media multitasking and attention problems using Network Analytic techniques. Computers in Human Behavior , 147 , 107829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107829

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research , 18 (1), 39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Frein, S. T., Jones, S. L., & Gerow, J. E. (2013). When it comes to Facebook there may be more to bad memory than just multitasking. Computers in Human Behavior , 29 (6), 2179–2182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.031

Gallen, C. L., Schaerlaeken, S., Younger, J. W., iLEAD Consortium, P., Younger, J. W., O’Laughlin, K. D., Anguera, J. A., Bunge, S. A., Ferrer, E. E., Hoeft, F., McCandliss, B. D., Mishra, J., Rosenberg-Lee, M., Gazzaley, A., Uncapher, M. R., Anguera, J. A., & Gazzaley, A. (2023). Contribution of sustained attention abilities to real-world academic skills in children. Scientific Reports , 13 (1), 2673. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29427-w

Gao, W., Liu, Z., Guo, Q., & Li, X. (2018). The dark side of ubiquitous connectivity in smartphone-based SNS: An integrated model from information perspective. Computers in Human Behavior , 84 , 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.023

Grellhesl, M., & Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. (2012). Using the uses and gratifications theory to understand gratifications sought through text messaging practices of male and female undergraduate students. Computers in Human Behavior , 28 (6), 2175–2181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.024

Hair, J. F. (2018). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling . SAGE.

Han, S., Min, J., & Lee, H. (2015). Antecedents of social presence and gratification of social connection needs in SNS: A study of Twitter users and their mobile and non-mobile usage. International Journal of Information Management , 35 (4), 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.04.004

Henning, C., Summerfeldt, L. J., & Parker, J. D. A. (2022). ADHD and academic success in University students: The important role of impaired attention. Journal of Attention Disorders , 26 (6), 893–901. https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547211036758

Hofmann, W., Friese, M., & Strack, F. (2009). Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems Perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science , 4 (2), 162–176.

Hofmann, W., Baumeister, R. F., Förster, G., & Vohs, K. D. (2012). Everyday temptations: An experience sampling study of desire, conflict, and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 102 (6), 1318–1335. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026545

Holmgren, H. G., Stockdale, L., Gale, M., & Coyne, S. M. (2022). Parent and child problematic media use: The role of maternal postpartum depression and dysfunctional parent-child interactions in young children. Computers in Human Behavior , 133 , 107293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107293

Hu, X., Song, Y., Zhu, R., He, S., Zhou, B., Li, X., Bao, H., Shen, S., & Liu, B. (2022a). Understanding the impact of emotional support on mental health resilience of the community in the social media in Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Affective Disorders , 308 , 360–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.105

Hu, X., Zhang, J., & Shen, S. (2022b). Exploring the pathway from seeking to sharing social support in e-learning: An investigation based on the norm of reciprocity and expectation confirmation theory. Current Psychology . https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03982-3

Islam, A. K. M. N., Whelan, E., & Brooks, S. (2021). Does multitasking computer self-efficacy mitigate the impact of social media affordances on overload and fatigue among professionals? Information Technology & People , 34 (5), 1439–1461. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-10-2019-0548

Jacobsen, W. C., & Forste, R. (2011). The Wired Generation: Academic and Social outcomes of Electronic Media Use among University students. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking , 14 (5), 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0135

Jensen, P. S., Mrazek, D., Knapp, P. K., Steinberg, L., Pfeffer, C., Schowalter, J., & Shapiro, T. (1997). Evolution and Revolution in Child Psychiatry: ADHD as a disorder of adaptation. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry , 36 (12), 1672–1681. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199712000-00015

Jeong, S. H., & Hwang, Y. (2012). Does Multitasking increase or decrease persuasion? Effects of Multitasking on Comprehension and Counterarguing. Journal of Communication , 62 (4), 571–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01659.x

Junco, R., & Cotten, S. R. (2012). No A 4 U: The relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Computers & Education , 59 (2), 505–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.023

Kane, M. J., Brown, L. H., McVay, J. C., Silvia, P. J., Germeys, I. M., & Kwapil, T. R. (2007). For whom the Mind Wanders, and when: An experience-sampling study of Working Memory and Executive Control in Daily Life. Psychological Science , 18 (7), 614–621.

Karpinski, A. C., Kirschner, P. A., Ozer, I., Mellott, J. A., & Ochwo, P. (2013). An exploration of social networking site use, multitasking, and academic performance among United States and European university students. Computers in Human Behavior , 29 (3), 1182–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.011

Karr-Wisniewski, P., & Lu, Y. (2010). When more is too much: Operationalizing technology overload and exploring its impact on knowledge worker productivity. Computers in Human Behavior , 26 (5), 1061–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.008

Kaye, A. (2019). Facebook Use and negative behavioral and Mental Health outcomes: A Literature Review. Journal of Addiction Research & Therapy , 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6105.1000375

Kim, Y., & Kim, B. (2022). Effects of young adults’ smartphone use for social media on communication network heterogeneity, social capital and civic engagement. Online Information Review , 46 (3), 616–638. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-08-2020-0332

Kim, S., Park, Y., & Headrick, L. (2015). Employees’ Micro-Break Activities and Job Performance:An Examination of Telemarketing Employees. Academy of Management Proceedings , 2015 (1), 13943. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2015.169

Kim, S., Park, Y., & Niu, Q. (2017). Micro-break activities at work to recover from daily work demands: Micro-break activities. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 38 (1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2109

Kim, S., Park, Y., & Headrick, L. (2018). Daily micro-breaks and job performance: General work engagement as a cross-level moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology , 103 (7), 772–786. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000308

Kircaburun, K., Alhabash, S., Tosuntaş, Ş. B., & Griffiths, M. D. (2020). Uses and gratifications of Problematic Social Media Use among University students: A simultaneous examination of the big five of personality traits, Social Media Platforms, and Social Media Use motives. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction , 18 (3), 525–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-9940-6

Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook® and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior , 26 (6), 1237–1245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024

Klobas, J. E., McGill, T. J., Moghavvemi, S., & Paramanathan, T. (2018). Compulsive YouTube usage: A comparison of use motivation and personality effects. Computers in Human Behavior , 87 , 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.038

Kokoç, M. (2021). The mediating role of attention control in the link between multitasking with social media and academic performances among adolescents. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology , 62 (4), 493–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12731

Kong, F., Meng, S., Deng, H., Wang, M., & Sun, X. (2023). Cognitive control in adolescents and young adults with media multitasking experience: A three-level Meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review , 35 (1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09746-0

Lau, W. W. F. (2017). Effects of social media usage and social media multitasking on the academic performance of university students. Computers in Human Behavior , 68 , 286–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.043

Le Roux, D. B., Parry, D. A., Totolo, A., Iyawa, G., Holloway, J., Prenter, A., & Botha, L. (2021). Media multitasking, online vigilance and academic performance among students in three southern African countries. Computers & Education , 160 , 104056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104056

Leftheriotis, I., & Giannakos, M. N. (2014). Using social media for work: Losing your time or improving your work? Computers in Human Behavior , 31 , 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.016

Lehn, H., Derks, E. M., Hudziak, J. J., Heutink, P., Van Beijsterveldt, T. C. E. M., & Boomsma, D. I. (2007). Attention problems and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity disorder in discordant and concordant monozygotic twins: Evidence of environmental mediators. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry , 46 (1), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.chi.0000242244.00174.d9

Leung, S. O., & Xu, M. L. (2013). Single-item measures for subjective academic performance, Self-Esteem, and Socioeconomic Status. Journal of Social Service Research , 39 (4), 511–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2013.794757

Luqman, A., Cao, X., Ali, A., Masood, A., & Yu, L. (2017). Empirical investigation of Facebook discontinues usage intentions based on SOR paradigm. Computers in Human Behavior , 70 , 544–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.020

Luyten, H. (2022). The global rise of online chatting and its adverse effect on reading literacy. Studies in Educational Evaluation , 72 , 101101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101101

Madore, K. P., Khazenzon, A. M., Backes, C. W., Jiang, J., Uncapher, M. R., Norcia, A. M., & Wagner, A. D. (2020). Memory failure predicted by attention lapsing and media multitasking. Nature , 587 (7832), 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2870-z

Mahalingham, T., McEvoy, P. M., & Clarke, P. J. F. (2023). Assessing the validity of self-report social media use: Evidence of no relationship with objective smartphone use. Computers in Human Behavior , 140 , 107567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107567

Maier, C., Laumer, S., Eckhardt, A., & Weitzel, T. (2015). Giving too much social support: Social overload on social networking sites. European Journal of Information Systems , 24 (5), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.3

Maqsood, A., Abbas, J., Rehman, G., & Mubeen, R. (2021). The paradigm shift for educational system continuance in the advent of COVID-19 pandemic: Mental health challenges and reflections. Current Research in Behavioral Sciences , 2 , 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbeha.2020.100011

Martín-Perpiñá, M. M., Viñaz Poch, F., & Malo Cerrato, S. (2019). Media multitasking impact in homework, executive function and academic performance in Spanish adolescents. Psicothema , 31.1 , 81–87. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.178

May, K. E., & Elder, A. D. (2018). Efficient, helpful, or distracting? A literature review of media multitasking in relation to academic performance. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education , 15 (1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0096-z

Meng, Q., Yan, Z., Abbas, J., Shankar, A., & Subramanian, M. (2023). Human–Computer Interaction and Digital literacy promote Educational Learning in Pre-school Children: Mediating Role of Psychological Resilience for kids’ Mental Well-Being and School Readiness. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction , 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2248432

Michikyan, M., Subrahmanyam, K., & Dennis, J. (2015). Facebook use and academic performance among college students: A mixed-methods study with a multi-ethnic sample. Computers in Human Behavior , 45 , 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.033

Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of Prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience , 24 (1), 167–202. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167

Moqbel, M., & Kock, N. (2018). Unveiling the dark side of social networking sites: Personal and work-related consequences of social networking site addiction. Information & Management , 55 (1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.05.001

Müller, K. W., Dreier, M., Beutel, M. E., Duven, E., Giralt, S., & Wölfling, K. (2016). A hidden type of internet addiction? Intense and addictive use of social networking sites in adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior , 55 , 172–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.007

Nduhura, D., & Prieler, M. (2017). When I chat online, I feel relaxed and work better: Exploring the use of social media in the public sector workplace in Rwanda. Telecommunications Policy , 41 (7–8), 708–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.05.008

Nie, Q., Zhang, J., Peng, J., & Chen, X. (2023). Daily micro-break activities and workplace well-being: A recovery perspective. Current Psychology , 42 (12), 9972–9985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02300-7

Nikkelen, S. W. C., Valkenburg, P. M., Huizinga, M., & Bushman, B. J. (2014). Media use and ADHD-related behaviors in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology , 50 (9), 2228–2241. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037318

O’Reilly, R. C. (2006). Biologically based computational models of high-level cognition. Science , 314 (5796), 91–94. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127242

Article   MathSciNet   Google Scholar  

Oksa, R., Kaakinen, M., Savela, N., Ellonen, N., & Oksanen, A. (2021). Professional social media usage: Work engagement perspective. New Media & Society , 23 (8), 2303–2326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820921938

Ophir, E., Nass, C., Wagner, A. D., & Posner, M. I. (2009). Cognitive control in Media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , 106 (37), 15583–15587.

Poulain, T., Vogel, M., Sobek, C., Hilbert, A., Körner, A., & Kiess, W. (2019). Associations between Socio-Economic Status and Child Health: Findings of a large German cohort study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health , 16 (5), 677. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16050677

Rahmi, M. A., Shahizan Othman, W., M., & Alhaji Musa, M. (2014). The improvement of students’ academic performance by Using Social Media through Collaborative Learning in Malaysian Higher Education. Asian Social Science , 10 (8), p210. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n8p210

Ralph, B. C. W., & Smilek, D. (2017). Individual differences in media multitasking and performance on the n-back. Attention Perception & Psychophysics , 79 (2), 582–592. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1260-y

Ravindran, T., Yeow Kuan, A. C., & Hoe Lian, D. G. (2014). Antecedents and effects of social network fatigue: Antecedents and effects of Social Network Fatigue. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology , 65 (11), 2306–2320. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23122

Reer, F., & Krämer, N. C. (2017). The connection between Introversion/Extraversion and Social Capital Outcomes of playing World of Warcraft. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking , 20 (2), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0439

Rhee, H., & Kim, S. (2016). Effects of breaks on regaining vitality at work: An empirical comparison of ‘conventional’ and ‘smart phone’ breaks. Computers in Human Behavior , 57 , 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.056

Rubin, A. M. (1993). Audience activity and media use. Communication Monographs , 60 (1), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759309376300

Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st Century. Mass Communication and Society , 3 (1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02

Ryan, T., & Xenos, S. (2011). Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. Computers in Human Behavior , 27 (5), 1658–1664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.004

Saleem, S., Feng, Y., & Luqman, A. (2021). Excessive SNS use at work, technological conflicts and employee performance: A social-cognitive-behavioral perspective. Technology in Society , 65 , 101584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101584

Somma, A., Adler, L. A., Gialdi, G., Arteconi, M., Cotilli, E., & Fossati, A. (2021). The Validity of the World Health Organization Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Self-Report Screening Scale for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition in Adolescence. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology , 31 (9), 631–638. https://doi.org/10.1089/cap.2020.0158

Spira, E. G., & Fischel, J. E. (2005). The impact of preschool inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity on social and academic development: A review. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry , 46 (7), 755–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01466.x

Sun, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2021). A review of theories and models applied in studies of social media addiction and implications for future research. Addictive Behaviors , 114 , 106699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106699

Sun, T., & Zhong, B. (2020). Multitasking as multisensory behavior: Revisiting media multitasking in the perspective of media ecology theory. Computers in Human Behavior , 104 , 106151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.027

Sutcliffe, A. G., Binder, J. F., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2018). Activity in social media and intimacy in social relationships. Computers in Human Behavior , 85 , 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.050

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science , 12 (2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

Terry, C. A., Mishra, P., & Roseth, C. J. (2016). Preference for multitasking, technological dependency, student metacognition, & pervasive technology use: An experimental intervention. Computers in Human Behavior , 65 , 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.009

Uncapher, M. R., & Wagner, A. D. (2018). Minds and brains of media multitaskers: Current findings and future directions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 115 (40), 9889–9896. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611612115

Uncapher, M. R., Thieu, K., M., & Wagner, A. D. (2016). Media multitasking and memory: Differences in working memory and long-term memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review , 23 (2), 483–490. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0907-3

Ustun, B., Adler, L. A., Rudin, C., Faraone, S. V., Spencer, T. J., Berglund, P., Gruber, M. J., & Kessler, R. C. (2017). The World Health Organization Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Self-Report Screening Scale for DSM-5 . JAMA Psychiatry , 74 (5), 520. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0298

Uzun, A. M., & Kilis, S. (2019). Does persistent involvement in media and technology lead to lower academic performance? Evaluating media and technology use in relation to multitasking, self-regulation and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior , 90 , 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.045

Vaghefi, I., Negoita, B., & Lapointe, L. (2023). The path to Hedonic Information System Use Addiction: A process model in the context of Social networking sites. Information Systems Research , 34 (1), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.1109

Vahedi, Z., Zannella, L., & Want, S. C. (2021). Students’ use of information and communication technologies in the classroom: Uses, restriction, and integration. Active Learning in Higher Education , 22 (3), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787419861926

van der Schuur, W. A., Baumgartner, S. E., Sumter, S. R., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). The consequences of media multitasking for youth: A review. Computers in Human Behavior , 53 , 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.035

Van Der Schuur, W. A., Baumgartner, S. E., Sumter, S. R., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2020). Exploring the long-term relationship between academic-media multitasking and adolescents’ academic achievement. New Media & Society , 22 (1), 140–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819861956

Visser, L., Linkersdörfer, J., & Hasselhorn, M. (2020). The role of ADHD symptoms in the relationship between academic achievement and psychopathological symptoms. Research in Developmental Disabilities , 97 , 103552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2019.103552

Whelan, E., Islam, A. K. M. N., & Brooks, S. (2020). Applying the SOBC paradigm to explain how social media overload affects academic performance. Computers & Education , 143 , 103692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103692

Wu, S. Y., & Gau, S. S. F. (2013). Correlates for academic performance and school functioning among youths with and without persistent attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Research in Developmental Disabilities , 34 (1), 505–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.09.004

Xie, J. Q., Rost, D. H., Wang, F. X., Wang, J. L., & Monk, R. L. (2021). The association between excessive social media use and distraction: An eye movement tracking study. Information & Management , 58 (2), 103415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103415

Xu, Z., Gao, X., Wei, J., Liu, H., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Adolescent user behaviors on short video application, cognitive functioning and academic performance. Computers & Education , 203 , 104865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104865

Yang, S., Liu, Y., & Wei, J. (2016). Social capital on mobile SNS addiction: A perspective from online and offline channel integrations. Internet Research , 26 (4), 982–1000. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-01-2015-0010

Yu, S., Abbas, J., Draghici, A., Negulescu, O. H., & Ain, N. U. (2022). Social Media Application as a New Paradigm for Business Communication: The role of COVID-19 knowledge, Social Distancing, and preventive attitudes. Frontiers in Psychology , 13 , 903082. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903082

Zendarski, N., Guo, S., Sciberras, E., Efron, D., Quach, J., Winter, L., Bisset, M., Middeldorp, C. M., & Coghill, D. (2022). Examining the Educational Gap for Children with ADHD and subthreshold ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders , 26 (2), 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054720972790

Zhang, J., Xue, T., Liu, S., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Heavy and light media multitaskers employ different neurocognitive strategies in a prospective memory task: An ERP study. Computers in Human Behavior , 135 , 107379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107379

Zhao, L. (2023). Social media multitasking and college students’ academic performance: A situation–organism–behavior–consequence perspective. Psychology in the Schools , 60 (9), 3151–3168. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22912

Zhao, L., Liang, C., & Gu, D. (2021). Mobile Social Media Use and Trailing Parents’ life satisfaction: Social Capital and Social Integration Perspective. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development , 92 (3), 383–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415020905549

Zimmerman, F. J., & Christakis, D. A. (2007). Associations between Content types of early media exposure and subsequent attentional problems. Pediatrics , 120 (5), 986–992. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-3322

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

This work was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China [No. 21CSH050].

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China

Weiyi Sun & Miao Chao

Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China

Center of Collaborative Innovation for Assessment and Promotion of Mental Health, 393 Binshuixi Road, Xiqing District, Tianjin, 300387, China

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

Weiyi Sun: Investigation, Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing ? original draft. Miao Chao: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing ? review & editing, Funding acquisition, Supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miao Chao .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with this study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A. Measurement items

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Sun, W., Chao, M. Exploring the influence of excessive social media use on academic performance through media multitasking and attention problems: a three-dimension usage perspective. Educ Inf Technol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12811-y

Download citation

Received : 28 July 2023

Accepted : 22 May 2024

Published : 07 June 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12811-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Excessive social media use
• Media multitasking
• Attention problems
• Academic performance
• Uses & gratification (U&G) theory
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Front Psychol

The effect of social media on the development of students’ affective variables

1 Science and Technology Department, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing, China

2 School of Marxism, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

3 Government Enterprise Customer Center, China Mobile Group Jiangsu Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China

The use of social media is incomparably on the rise among students, influenced by the globalized forms of communication and the post-pandemic rush to use multiple social media platforms for education in different fields of study. Though social media has created tremendous chances for sharing ideas and emotions, the kind of social support it provides might fail to meet students’ emotional needs, or the alleged positive effects might be short-lasting. In recent years, several studies have been conducted to explore the potential effects of social media on students’ affective traits, such as stress, anxiety, depression, and so on. The present paper reviews the findings of the exemplary published works of research to shed light on the positive and negative potential effects of the massive use of social media on students’ emotional well-being. This review can be insightful for teachers who tend to take the potential psychological effects of social media for granted. They may want to know more about the actual effects of the over-reliance on and the excessive (and actually obsessive) use of social media on students’ developing certain images of self and certain emotions which are not necessarily positive. There will be implications for pre- and in-service teacher training and professional development programs and all those involved in student affairs.

Introduction

Social media has turned into an essential element of individuals’ lives including students in today’s world of communication. Its use is growing significantly more than ever before especially in the post-pandemic era, marked by a great revolution happening to the educational systems. Recent investigations of using social media show that approximately 3 billion individuals worldwide are now communicating via social media ( Iwamoto and Chun, 2020 ). This growing population of social media users is spending more and more time on social network groupings, as facts and figures show that individuals spend 2 h a day, on average, on a variety of social media applications, exchanging pictures and messages, updating status, tweeting, favoring, and commenting on many updated socially shared information ( Abbott, 2017 ).

Researchers have begun to investigate the psychological effects of using social media on students’ lives. Chukwuere and Chukwuere (2017) maintained that social media platforms can be considered the most important source of changing individuals’ mood, because when someone is passively using a social media platform seemingly with no special purpose, s/he can finally feel that his/her mood has changed as a function of the nature of content overviewed. Therefore, positive and negative moods can easily be transferred among the population using social media networks ( Chukwuere and Chukwuere, 2017 ). This may become increasingly important as students are seen to be using social media platforms more than before and social networking is becoming an integral aspect of their lives. As described by Iwamoto and Chun (2020) , when students are affected by social media posts, especially due to the increasing reliance on social media use in life, they may be encouraged to begin comparing themselves to others or develop great unrealistic expectations of themselves or others, which can have several affective consequences.

Considering the increasing influence of social media on education, the present paper aims to focus on the affective variables such as depression, stress, and anxiety, and how social media can possibly increase or decrease these emotions in student life. The exemplary works of research on this topic in recent years will be reviewed here, hoping to shed light on the positive and negative effects of these ever-growing influential platforms on the psychology of students.

Significance of the study

Though social media, as the name suggests, is expected to keep people connected, probably this social connection is only superficial, and not adequately deep and meaningful to help individuals feel emotionally attached to others. The psychological effects of social media on student life need to be studied in more depth to see whether social media really acts as a social support for students and whether students can use social media to cope with negative emotions and develop positive feelings or not. In other words, knowledge of the potential effects of the growing use of social media on students’ emotional well-being can bridge the gap between the alleged promises of social media and what it actually has to offer to students in terms of self-concept, self-respect, social role, and coping strategies (for stress, anxiety, etc.).

Exemplary general literature on psychological effects of social media

Before getting down to the effects of social media on students’ emotional well-being, some exemplary works of research in recent years on the topic among general populations are reviewed. For one, Aalbers et al. (2018) reported that individuals who spent more time passively working with social media suffered from more intense levels of hopelessness, loneliness, depression, and perceived inferiority. For another, Tang et al. (2013) observed that the procedures of sharing information, commenting, showing likes and dislikes, posting messages, and doing other common activities on social media are correlated with higher stress. Similarly, Ley et al. (2014) described that people who spend 2 h, on average, on social media applications will face many tragic news, posts, and stories which can raise the total intensity of their stress. This stress-provoking effect of social media has been also pinpointed by Weng and Menczer (2015) , who contended that social media becomes a main source of stress because people often share all kinds of posts, comments, and stories ranging from politics and economics, to personal and social affairs. According to Iwamoto and Chun (2020) , anxiety and depression are the negative emotions that an individual may develop when some source of stress is present. In other words, when social media sources become stress-inducing, there are high chances that anxiety and depression also develop.

Charoensukmongkol (2018) reckoned that the mental health and well-being of the global population can be at a great risk through the uncontrolled massive use of social media. These researchers also showed that social media sources can exert negative affective impacts on teenagers, as they can induce more envy and social comparison. According to Fleck and Johnson-Migalski (2015) , though social media, at first, plays the role of a stress-coping strategy, when individuals continue to see stressful conditions (probably experienced and shared by others in media), they begin to develop stress through the passage of time. Chukwuere and Chukwuere (2017) maintained that social media platforms continue to be the major source of changing mood among general populations. For example, someone might be passively using a social media sphere, and s/he may finally find him/herself with a changed mood depending on the nature of the content faced. Then, this good or bad mood is easily shared with others in a flash through the social media. Finally, as Alahmar (2016) described, social media exposes people especially the young generation to new exciting activities and events that may attract them and keep them engaged in different media contexts for hours just passing their time. It usually leads to reduced productivity, reduced academic achievement, and addiction to constant media use ( Alahmar, 2016 ).

The number of studies on the potential psychological effects of social media on people in general is higher than those selectively addressed here. For further insights into this issue, some other suggested works of research include Chang (2012) , Sriwilai and Charoensukmongkol (2016) , and Zareen et al. (2016) . Now, we move to the studies that more specifically explored the effects of social media on students’ affective states.

Review of the affective influences of social media on students

Vygotsky’s mediational theory (see Fernyhough, 2008 ) can be regarded as a main theoretical background for the support of social media on learners’ affective states. Based on this theory, social media can play the role of a mediational means between learners and the real environment. Learners’ understanding of this environment can be mediated by the image shaped via social media. This image can be either close to or different from the reality. In the case of the former, learners can develop their self-image and self-esteem. In the case of the latter, learners might develop unrealistic expectations of themselves by comparing themselves to others. As it will be reviewed below among the affective variables increased or decreased in students under the influence of the massive use of social media are anxiety, stress, depression, distress, rumination, and self-esteem. These effects have been explored more among school students in the age range of 13–18 than university students (above 18), but some studies were investigated among college students as well. Exemplary works of research on these affective variables are reviewed here.

In a cross-sectional study, O’Dea and Campbell (2011) explored the impact of online interactions of social networks on the psychological distress of adolescent students. These researchers found a negative correlation between the time spent on social networking and mental distress. Dumitrache et al. (2012) explored the relations between depression and the identity associated with the use of the popular social media, the Facebook. This study showed significant associations between depression and the number of identity-related information pieces shared on this social network. Neira and Barber (2014) explored the relationship between students’ social media use and depressed mood at teenage. No significant correlation was found between these two variables. In the same year, Tsitsika et al. (2014) explored the associations between excessive use of social media and internalizing emotions. These researchers found a positive correlation between more than 2-h a day use of social media and anxiety and depression.

Hanprathet et al. (2015) reported a statistically significant positive correlation between addiction to Facebook and depression among about a thousand high school students in wealthy populations of Thailand and warned against this psychological threat. Sampasa-Kanyinga and Lewis (2015) examined the relationship between social media use and psychological distress. These researchers found that the use of social media for more than 2 h a day was correlated with a higher intensity of psychological distress. Banjanin et al. (2015) tested the relationship between too much use of social networking and depression, yet found no statistically significant correlation between these two variables. Frison and Eggermont (2016) examined the relationships between different forms of Facebook use, perceived social support of social media, and male and female students’ depressed mood. These researchers found a positive association between the passive use of the Facebook and depression and also between the active use of the social media and depression. Furthermore, the perceived social support of the social media was found to mediate this association. Besides, gender was found as the other factor to mediate this relationship.

Vernon et al. (2017) explored change in negative investment in social networking in relation to change in depression and externalizing behavior. These researchers found that increased investment in social media predicted higher depression in adolescent students, which was a function of the effect of higher levels of disrupted sleep. Barry et al. (2017) explored the associations between the use of social media by adolescents and their psychosocial adjustment. Social media activity showed to be positively and moderately associated with depression and anxiety. Another investigation was focused on secondary school students in China conducted by Li et al. (2017) . The findings showed a mediating role of insomnia on the significant correlation between depression and addiction to social media. In the same year, Yan et al. (2017) aimed to explore the time spent on social networks and its correlation with anxiety among middle school students. They found a significant positive correlation between more than 2-h use of social networks and the intensity of anxiety.

Also in China, Wang et al. (2018) showed that addiction to social networking sites was correlated positively with depression, and this correlation was mediated by rumination. These researchers also found that this mediating effect was moderated by self-esteem. It means that the effect of addiction on depression was compounded by low self-esteem through rumination. In another work of research, Drouin et al. (2018) showed that though social media is expected to act as a form of social support for the majority of university students, it can adversely affect students’ mental well-being, especially for those who already have high levels of anxiety and depression. In their research, the social media resources were found to be stress-inducing for half of the participants, all university students. The higher education population was also studied by Iwamoto and Chun (2020) . These researchers investigated the emotional effects of social media in higher education and found that the socially supportive role of social media was overshadowed in the long run in university students’ lives and, instead, fed into their perceived depression, anxiety, and stress.

Keles et al. (2020) provided a systematic review of the effect of social media on young and teenage students’ depression, psychological distress, and anxiety. They found that depression acted as the most frequent affective variable measured. The most salient risk factors of psychological distress, anxiety, and depression based on the systematic review were activities such as repeated checking for messages, personal investment, the time spent on social media, and problematic or addictive use. Similarly, Mathewson (2020) investigated the effect of using social media on college students’ mental health. The participants stated the experience of anxiety, depression, and suicidality (thoughts of suicide or attempts to suicide). The findings showed that the types and frequency of using social media and the students’ perceived mental health were significantly correlated with each other.

The body of research on the effect of social media on students’ affective and emotional states has led to mixed results. The existing literature shows that there are some positive and some negative affective impacts. Yet, it seems that the latter is pre-dominant. Mathewson (2020) attributed these divergent positive and negative effects to the different theoretical frameworks adopted in different studies and also the different contexts (different countries with whole different educational systems). According to Fredrickson’s broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions ( Fredrickson, 2001 ), the mental repertoires of learners can be built and broadened by how they feel. For instance, some external stimuli might provoke negative emotions such as anxiety and depression in learners. Having experienced these negative emotions, students might repeatedly check their messages on social media or get addicted to them. As a result, their cognitive repertoire and mental capacity might become limited and they might lose their concentration during their learning process. On the other hand, it should be noted that by feeling positive, learners might take full advantage of the affordances of the social media and; thus, be able to follow their learning goals strategically. This point should be highlighted that the link between the use of social media and affective states is bi-directional. Therefore, strategic use of social media or its addictive use by students can direct them toward either positive experiences like enjoyment or negative ones such as anxiety and depression. Also, these mixed positive and negative effects are similar to the findings of several other relevant studies on general populations’ psychological and emotional health. A number of studies (with general research populations not necessarily students) showed that social networks have facilitated the way of staying in touch with family and friends living far away as well as an increased social support ( Zhang, 2017 ). Given the positive and negative emotional effects of social media, social media can either scaffold the emotional repertoire of students, which can develop positive emotions in learners, or induce negative provokers in them, based on which learners might feel negative emotions such as anxiety and depression. However, admittedly, social media has also generated a domain that encourages the act of comparing lives, and striving for approval; therefore, it establishes and internalizes unrealistic perceptions ( Virden et al., 2014 ; Radovic et al., 2017 ).

It should be mentioned that the susceptibility of affective variables to social media should be interpreted from a dynamic lens. This means that the ecology of the social media can make changes in the emotional experiences of learners. More specifically, students’ affective variables might self-organize into different states under the influence of social media. As for the positive correlation found in many studies between the use of social media and such negative effects as anxiety, depression, and stress, it can be hypothesized that this correlation is induced by the continuous comparison the individual makes and the perception that others are doing better than him/her influenced by the posts that appear on social media. Using social media can play a major role in university students’ psychological well-being than expected. Though most of these studies were correlational, and correlation is not the same as causation, as the studies show that the number of participants experiencing these negative emotions under the influence of social media is significantly high, more extensive research is highly suggested to explore causal effects ( Mathewson, 2020 ).

As the review of exemplary studies showed, some believed that social media increased comparisons that students made between themselves and others. This finding ratifies the relevance of the Interpretation Comparison Model ( Stapel and Koomen, 2000 ; Stapel, 2007 ) and Festinger’s (1954) Social Comparison Theory. Concerning the negative effects of social media on students’ psychology, it can be argued that individuals may fail to understand that the content presented in social media is usually changed to only represent the attractive aspects of people’s lives, showing an unrealistic image of things. We can add that this argument also supports the relevance of the Social Comparison Theory and the Interpretation Comparison Model ( Stapel and Koomen, 2000 ; Stapel, 2007 ), because social media sets standards that students think they should compare themselves with. A constant observation of how other students or peers are showing their instances of achievement leads to higher self-evaluation ( Stapel and Koomen, 2000 ). It is conjectured that the ubiquitous role of social media in student life establishes unrealistic expectations and promotes continuous comparison as also pinpointed in the Interpretation Comparison Model ( Stapel and Koomen, 2000 ; Stapel, 2007 ).

Implications of the study

The use of social media is ever increasing among students, both at school and university, which is partly because of the promises of technological advances in communication services and partly because of the increased use of social networks for educational purposes in recent years after the pandemic. This consistent use of social media is not expected to leave students’ psychological, affective and emotional states untouched. Thus, it is necessary to know how the growing usage of social networks is associated with students’ affective health on different aspects. Therefore, we found it useful to summarize the research findings in recent years in this respect. If those somehow in charge of student affairs in educational settings are aware of the potential positive or negative effects of social media usage on students, they can better understand the complexities of students’ needs and are better capable of meeting them.

Psychological counseling programs can be initiated at schools or universities to check upon the latest state of students’ mental and emotional health influenced by the pervasive use of social media. The counselors can be made aware of the potential adverse effects of social networking and can adapt the content of their inquiries accordingly. Knowledge of the potential reasons for student anxiety, depression, and stress can help school or university counselors to find individualized coping strategies when they diagnose any symptom of distress in students influenced by an excessive use of social networking.

Admittedly, it is neither possible to discard the use of social media in today’s academic life, nor to keep students’ use of social networks fully controlled. Certainly, the educational space in today’s world cannot do without the social media, which has turned into an integral part of everybody’s life. Yet, probably students need to be instructed on how to take advantage of the media and to be the least affected negatively by its occasional superficial and unrepresentative content. Compensatory programs might be needed at schools or universities to encourage students to avoid making unrealistic and impartial comparisons of themselves and the flamboyant images of others displayed on social media. Students can be taught to develop self-appreciation and self-care while continuing to use the media to their benefit.

The teachers’ role as well as the curriculum developers’ role are becoming more important than ever, as they can significantly help to moderate the adverse effects of the pervasive social media use on students’ mental and emotional health. The kind of groupings formed for instructional purposes, for example, in social media can be done with greater care by teachers to make sure that the members of the groups are homogeneous and the tasks and activities shared in the groups are quite relevant and realistic. The teachers cannot always be in a full control of students’ use of social media, and the other fact is that students do not always and only use social media for educational purposes. They spend more time on social media for communicating with friends or strangers or possibly they just passively receive the content produced out of any educational scope just for entertainment. This uncontrolled and unrealistic content may give them a false image of life events and can threaten their mental and emotional health. Thus, teachers can try to make students aware of the potential hazards of investing too much of their time on following pages or people that publish false and misleading information about their personal or social identities. As students, logically expected, spend more time with their teachers than counselors, they may be better and more receptive to the advice given by the former than the latter.

Teachers may not be in full control of their students’ use of social media, but they have always played an active role in motivating or demotivating students to take particular measures in their academic lives. If teachers are informed of the recent research findings about the potential effects of massively using social media on students, they may find ways to reduce students’ distraction or confusion in class due to the excessive or over-reliant use of these networks. Educators may more often be mesmerized by the promises of technology-, computer- and mobile-assisted learning. They may tend to encourage the use of social media hoping to benefit students’ social and interpersonal skills, self-confidence, stress-managing and the like. Yet, they may be unaware of the potential adverse effects on students’ emotional well-being and, thus, may find the review of the recent relevant research findings insightful. Also, teachers can mediate between learners and social media to manipulate the time learners spend on social media. Research has mainly indicated that students’ emotional experiences are mainly dependent on teachers’ pedagogical approach. They should refrain learners from excessive use of, or overreliance on, social media. Raising learners’ awareness of this fact that individuals should develop their own path of development for learning, and not build their development based on unrealistic comparison of their competences with those of others, can help them consider positive values for their activities on social media and, thus, experience positive emotions.

At higher education, students’ needs are more life-like. For example, their employment-seeking spirits might lead them to create accounts in many social networks, hoping for a better future. However, membership in many of these networks may end in the mere waste of the time that could otherwise be spent on actual on-campus cooperative projects. Universities can provide more on-campus resources both for research and work experience purposes from which the students can benefit more than the cyberspace that can be tricky on many occasions. Two main theories underlying some negative emotions like boredom and anxiety are over-stimulation and under-stimulation. Thus, what learners feel out of their involvement in social media might be directed toward negative emotions due to the stimulating environment of social media. This stimulating environment makes learners rely too much, and spend too much time, on social media or use them obsessively. As a result, they might feel anxious or depressed. Given the ubiquity of social media, these negative emotions can be replaced with positive emotions if learners become aware of the psychological effects of social media. Regarding the affordances of social media for learners, they can take advantage of the potential affordances of these media such as improving their literacy, broadening their communication skills, or enhancing their distance learning opportunities.

A review of the research findings on the relationship between social media and students’ affective traits revealed both positive and negative findings. Yet, the instances of the latter were more salient and the negative psychological symptoms such as depression, anxiety, and stress have been far from negligible. These findings were discussed in relation to some more relevant theories such as the social comparison theory, which predicted that most of the potential issues with the young generation’s excessive use of social media were induced by the unfair comparisons they made between their own lives and the unrealistic portrayal of others’ on social media. Teachers, education policymakers, curriculum developers, and all those in charge of the student affairs at schools and universities should be made aware of the psychological effects of the pervasive use of social media on students, and the potential threats.

It should be reminded that the alleged socially supportive and communicative promises of the prevalent use of social networking in student life might not be fully realized in practice. Students may lose self-appreciation and gratitude when they compare their current state of life with the snapshots of others’ or peers’. A depressed or stressed-out mood can follow. Students at schools or universities need to learn self-worth to resist the adverse effects of the superficial support they receive from social media. Along this way, they should be assisted by the family and those in charge at schools or universities, most importantly the teachers. As already suggested, counseling programs might help with raising students’ awareness of the potential psychological threats of social media to their health. Considering the ubiquity of social media in everybody’ life including student life worldwide, it seems that more coping and compensatory strategies should be contrived to moderate the adverse psychological effects of the pervasive use of social media on students. Also, the affective influences of social media should not be generalized but they need to be interpreted from an ecological or contextual perspective. This means that learners might have different emotions at different times or different contexts while being involved in social media. More specifically, given the stative approach to learners’ emotions, what learners emotionally experience in their application of social media can be bound to their intra-personal and interpersonal experiences. This means that the same learner at different time points might go through different emotions Also, learners’ emotional states as a result of their engagement in social media cannot be necessarily generalized to all learners in a class.

As the majority of studies on the psychological effects of social media on student life have been conducted on school students than in higher education, it seems it is too soon to make any conclusive remark on this population exclusively. Probably, in future, further studies of the psychological complexities of students at higher education and a better knowledge of their needs can pave the way for making more insightful conclusions about the effects of social media on their affective states.

Suggestions for further research

The majority of studies on the potential effects of social media usage on students’ psychological well-being are either quantitative or qualitative in type, each with many limitations. Presumably, mixed approaches in near future can better provide a comprehensive assessment of these potential associations. Moreover, most studies on this topic have been cross-sectional in type. There is a significant dearth of longitudinal investigation on the effect of social media on developing positive or negative emotions in students. This seems to be essential as different affective factors such as anxiety, stress, self-esteem, and the like have a developmental nature. Traditional research methods with single-shot designs for data collection fail to capture the nuances of changes in these affective variables. It can be expected that more longitudinal studies in future can show how the continuous use of social media can affect the fluctuations of any of these affective variables during the different academic courses students pass at school or university.

As already raised in some works of research reviewed, the different patterns of impacts of social media on student life depend largely on the educational context. Thus, the same research designs with the same academic grade students and even the same age groups can lead to different findings concerning the effects of social media on student psychology in different countries. In other words, the potential positive and negative effects of popular social media like Facebook, Snapchat, Twitter, etc., on students’ affective conditions can differ across different educational settings in different host countries. Thus, significantly more research is needed in different contexts and cultures to compare the results.

There is also a need for further research on the higher education students and how their affective conditions are positively and negatively affected by the prevalent use of social media. University students’ psychological needs might be different from other academic grades and, thus, the patterns of changes that the overall use of social networking can create in their emotions can be also different. Their main reasons for using social media might be different from school students as well, which need to be investigated more thoroughly. The sorts of interventions needed to moderate the potential negative effects of social networking on them can be different too, all requiring a new line of research in education domain.

Finally, there are hopes that considering the ever-increasing popularity of social networking in education, the potential psychological effects of social media on teachers be explored as well. Though teacher psychology has only recently been considered for research, the literature has provided profound insights into teachers developing stress, motivation, self-esteem, and many other emotions. In today’s world driven by global communications in the cyberspace, teachers like everyone else are affecting and being affected by social networking. The comparison theory can hold true for teachers too. Thus, similar threats (of social media) to self-esteem and self-worth can be there for teachers too besides students, which are worth investigating qualitatively and quantitatively.

Probably a new line of research can be initiated to explore the co-development of teacher and learner psychological traits under the influence of social media use in longitudinal studies. These will certainly entail sophisticated research methods to be capable of unraveling the nuances of variation in these traits and their mutual effects, for example, stress, motivation, and self-esteem. If these are incorporated within mixed-approach works of research, more comprehensive and better insightful findings can be expected to emerge. Correlational studies need to be followed by causal studies in educational settings. As many conditions of the educational settings do not allow for having control groups or randomization, probably, experimental studies do not help with this. Innovative research methods, case studies or else, can be used to further explore the causal relations among the different features of social media use and the development of different affective variables in teachers or learners. Examples of such innovative research methods can be process tracing, qualitative comparative analysis, and longitudinal latent factor modeling (for a more comprehensive view, see Hiver and Al-Hoorie, 2019 ).

Author contributions

Both authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

This study was sponsored by Wuxi Philosophy and Social Sciences bidding project—“Special Project for Safeguarding the Rights and Interests of Workers in the New Form of Employment” (Grant No. WXSK22-GH-13). This study was sponsored by the Key Project of Party Building and Ideological and Political Education Research of Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications—“Research on the Guidance and Countermeasures of Network Public Opinion in Colleges and Universities in the Modern Times” (Grant No. XC 2021002).

Conflict of interest

Author XX was employed by China Mobile Group Jiangsu Co., Ltd. The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

• Aalbers G., McNally R. J., Heeren A., de Wit S., Fried E. I. (2018). Social media and depression symptoms: A network perspective. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 148 1454–1462. 10.1037/xge0000528 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Abbott J. (2017). Introduction: Assessing the social and political impact of the internet and new social media in Asia. J. Contemp. Asia 43 579–590. 10.1080/00472336.2013.785698 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Alahmar A. T. (2016). The impact of social media on the academic performance of second year medical students at College of Medicine, University of Babylon, Iraq. J. Med. Allied Sci. 6 77–83. 10.5455/jmas.236927 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Banjanin N., Banjanin N., Dimitrijevic I., Pantic I. (2015). Relationship between internet use and depression: Focus on physiological mood oscillations, social networking and online addictive behavior. Comp. Hum. Behav. 43 308–312. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.013 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Barry C. T., Sidoti C. L., Briggs S. M., Reiter S. R., Lindsey R. A. (2017). Adolescent social media use and mental health from adolescent and parent perspectives. J. Adolesc. 61 1–11. 10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.08.005 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chang Y. (2012). The relationship between maladaptive perfectionism with burnout: Testing mediating effect of emotion-focused coping. Pers. Individ. Differ. 53 635–639. 10.1016/j.paid.2012.05.002 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Charoensukmongkol P. (2018). The impact of social media on social comparison and envy in teenagers: The moderating role of the parent comparing children and in-group competition among friends. J. Child Fam. Stud. 27 69–79. 10.1007/s10826-017-0872-8 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chukwuere J. E., Chukwuere P. C. (2017). The impact of social media on social lifestyle: A case study of university female students. Gender Behav. 15 9966–9981. [ Google Scholar ]
• Drouin M., Reining L., Flanagan M., Carpenter M., Toscos T. (2018). College students in distress: Can social media be a source of social support? Coll. Stud. J. 52 494–504. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dumitrache S. D., Mitrofan L., Petrov Z. (2012). Self-image and depressive tendencies among adolescent Facebook users. Rev. Psihol. 58 285–295. [ Google Scholar ]
• Fernyhough C. (2008). Getting Vygotskian about theory of mind: Mediation, dialogue, and the development of social understanding. Dev. Rev. 28 225–262. 10.1016/j.dr.2007.03.001 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Festinger L. (1954). A Theory of social comparison processes. Hum. Relat. 7 117–140. 10.1177/001872675400700202 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Fleck J., Johnson-Migalski L. (2015). The impact of social media on personal and professional lives: An Adlerian perspective. J. Individ. Psychol. 71 135–142. 10.1353/jip.2015.0013 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Fredrickson B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Am. Psychol. 56 218–226. 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Frison E., Eggermont S. (2016). Exploring the relationships between different types of Facebook use, perceived online social support, and adolescents’ depressed mood. Soc. Sci. Compu. Rev. 34 153–171. 10.1177/0894439314567449 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hanprathet N., Manwong M., Khumsri J., Yingyeun R., Phanasathit M. (2015). Facebook addiction and its relationship with mental health among Thai high school students. J. Med. Assoc. Thailand 98 S81–S90. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hiver P., Al-Hoorie A. H. (2019). Research Methods for Complexity Theory in Applied Linguistics. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/HIVER5747 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Iwamoto D., Chun H. (2020). The emotional impact of social media in higher education. Int. J. High. Educ. 9 239–247. 10.5430/ijhe.v9n2p239 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Keles B., McCrae N., Grealish A. (2020). A systematic review: The influence of social media on depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents. Int. J. Adolesc. Youth 25 79–93. 10.1080/02673843.2019.1590851 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ley B., Ogonowski C., Hess J., Reichling T., Wan L., Wulf V. (2014). Impacts of new technologies on media usage and social behavior in domestic environments. Behav. Inform. Technol. 33 815–828. 10.1080/0144929X.2013.832383 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Li J.-B., Lau J. T. F., Mo P. K. H., Su X.-F., Tang J., Qin Z.-G., et al. (2017). Insomnia partially mediated the association between problematic Internet use and depression among secondary school students in China. J. Behav. Addict. 6 554–563. 10.1556/2006.6.2017.085 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mathewson M. (2020). The impact of social media usage on students’ mental health. J. Stud. Affairs 29 146–160. [ Google Scholar ]
• Neira B. C. J., Barber B. L. (2014). Social networking site use: Linked to adolescents’ social self-concept, self-esteem, and depressed mood. Aus. J. Psychol. 66 56–64. 10.1111/ajpy.12034 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• O’Dea B., Campbell A. (2011). Online social networking amongst teens: Friend or foe? Ann. Rev. CyberTher. Telemed. 9 108–112. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Radovic A., Gmelin T., Stein B. D., Miller E. (2017). Depressed adolescents positive and negative use of social media. J. Adolesc. 55 5–15. 10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.12.002 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sampasa-Kanyinga H., Lewis R. F. (2015). Frequent use of social networking sites is associated with poor psychological functioning among children and adolescents. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Network. 18 380–385. 10.1089/cyber.2015.0055 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sriwilai K., Charoensukmongkol P. (2016). Face it, don’t Facebook it: Impacts of social media addiction on mindfulness, coping strategies and the consequence on emotional exhaustion. Stress Health 32 427–434. 10.1002/smi.2637 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Stapel D. A. (2007). “ In the mind of the beholder: The interpretation comparison model of accessibility effects ,” in Assimilation and Contrast in Social Psychology , eds Stapel D. A., Suls J. (London: Psychology Press; ), 143–164. [ Google Scholar ]
• Stapel D. A., Koomen W. (2000). Distinctiveness of others, mutability of selves: Their impact on self-evaluations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 79 1068–1087. 10.1037//0022-3514.79.6.1068 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tang F., Wang X., Norman C. S. (2013). An investigation of the impact of media capabilities and extraversion on social presence and user satisfaction. Behav. Inform. Technol. 32 1060–1073. 10.1080/0144929X.2013.830335 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tsitsika A. K., Tzavela E. C., Janikian M., Ólafsson K., Iordache A., Schoenmakers T. M., et al. (2014). Online social networking in adolescence: Patterns of use in six European countries and links with psychosocial functioning. J. Adolesc. Health 55 141–147. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.11.010 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Vernon L., Modecki K. L., Barber B. L. (2017). Tracking effects of problematic social networking on adolescent psychopathology: The mediating role of sleep disruptions. J. Clin. Child Adolesc. Psychol. 46 269–283. 10.1080/15374416.2016.1188702 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Virden A., Trujillo A., Predeger E. (2014). Young adult females’ perceptions of high-risk social media behaviors: A focus-group approach. J. Commun. Health Nurs. 31 133–144. 10.1080/07370016.2014.926677 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wang P., Wang X., Wu Y., Xie X., Wang X., Zhao F., et al. (2018). Social networking sites addiction and adolescent depression: A moderated mediation model of rumination and self-esteem. Pers. Individ. Differ. 127 162–167. 10.1016/j.paid.2018.02.008 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Weng L., Menczer F. (2015). Topicality and impact in social media: Diverse messages, focused messengers. PLoS One 10 : e0118410 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0118410 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Yan H., Zhang R., Oniffrey T. M., Chen G., Wang Y., Wu Y., et al. (2017). Associations among screen time and unhealthy behaviors, academic performance, and well-being in Chinese adolescents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14 : 596 . 10.3390/ijerph14060596 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zareen N., Karim N., Khan U. A. (2016). Psycho-emotional impact of social media emojis. ISRA Med. J. 8 257–262. [ Google Scholar ]
• Zhang R. (2017). The stress-buffering effect of self-disclosure on Facebook: An examination of stressful life events, social support, and mental health among college students. Comp. Hum. Behav. 75 527–537. 10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.043 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]

•   UoN Digital Repository Home
• Theses and Dissertations
• Faculty of Education (FEd)

Effects Of Social Media On Students Academic Performnace In Tertiary Education Institutions In Thika Municipality, Kiambu County, Kenya

Usage rights, collections.

• Faculty of Education (FEd) [5979]

The following license files are associated with this item:

• Creative Commons

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Open access
• Published: 02 May 2024

Effectiveness of social media-assisted course on learning self-efficacy

• Jiaying Hu 1 ,
• Yicheng Lai 2 &
• Xiuhua Yi 3  

Scientific Reports volume  14 , Article number:  10112 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

622 Accesses

1 Altmetric

Metrics details

• Human behaviour

The social media platform and the information dissemination revolution have changed the thinking, needs, and methods of students, bringing development opportunities and challenges to higher education. This paper introduces social media into the classroom and uses quantitative analysis to investigate the relation between design college students’ learning self-efficacy and social media for design students, aiming to determine the effectiveness of social media platforms on self-efficacy. This study is conducted on university students in design media courses and is quasi-experimental, using a randomized pre-test and post-test control group design. The study participants are 73 second-year design undergraduates. Independent samples t-tests showed that the network interaction factors of social media had a significant impact on college students learning self-efficacy. The use of social media has a significant positive predictive effect on all dimensions of learning self-efficacy. Our analysis suggests that using the advantages and value of online social platforms, weakening the disadvantages of the network, scientifically using online learning resources, and combining traditional classrooms with the Internet can improve students' learning self-efficacy.

Similar content being viewed by others

The effectiveness of using edublogs as an instructional and motivating tool in the context of higher education

The impact of self-determination theory: the moderating functions of social media (SM) use in education and affective learning engagement

Looking back to move forward: comparison of instructors’ and undergraduates’ retrospection on the effectiveness of online learning using the nine-outcome influencing factors, introduction.

Social media is a way of sharing information, ideas, and opinions with others one. It can be used to create relationships between people and businesses. Social media has changed the communication way, it’s no longer just about talking face to face but also using a digital platform such as Facebook or Twitter. Today, social media is becoming increasingly popular in everyone's lives, including students and researchers 1 . Social media provides many opportunities for learners to publish their work globally, bringing many benefits to teaching and learning. The publication of students' work online has led to a more positive attitude towards learning and increased achievement and motivation. Other studies report that student online publications or work promote reflection on personal growth and development and provide opportunities for students to imagine more clearly the purpose of their work 2 . In addition, learning environments that include student publications allow students to examine issues differently, create new connections, and ultimately form new entities that can be shared globally 3 , 4 .

Learning self-efficacy is a belief that you can learn something new. It comes from the Latin word “self” and “efficax” which means efficient or effective. Self-efficacy is based on your beliefs about yourself, how capable you are to learn something new, and your ability to use what you have learned in real-life situations. This concept was first introduced by Bandura (1977), who studied the effects of social reinforcement on children’s learning behavior. He found that when children were rewarded for their efforts they would persist longer at tasks that they did not like or had low interest in doing. Social media, a ubiquitous force in today's digital age, has revolutionized the way people interact and share information. With the rise of social media platforms, individuals now have access to a wealth of online resources that can enhance their learning capabilities. This access to information and communication has also reshaped the way students approach their studies, potentially impacting their learning self-efficacy. Understanding the role of social media in shaping students' learning self-efficacy is crucial in providing effective educational strategies that promote healthy learning and development 5 . Unfortunately, the learning curve for the associated metadata base modeling methodologies and their corresponding computer-aided software engineering (CASE) tools have made it difficult for students to grasp. Addressing this learning issue examined the effect of this MLS on the self-efficacy of learning these topics 6 . Bates et al. 7 hypothesize a mediated model in which a set of antecedent variables influenced students’ online learning self-efficacy which, in turn, affected student outcome expectations, mastery perceptions, and the hours spent per week using online learning technology to complete learning assignments for university courses. Shen et al. 8 through exploratory factor analysis identifies five dimensions of online learning self-efficacy: (a) self-efficacy to complete an online course (b) self-efficacy to interact socially with classmates (c) self-efficacy to handle tools in a Course Management System (CMS) (d) self-efficacy to interact with instructors in an online course, and (e) self-efficacy to interact with classmates for academic purposes. Chiu 9 established a model for analyzing the mediating effect that learning self-efficacy and social self-efficacy have on the relationship between university students’ perceived life stress and smartphone addiction. Kim et al. 10 study was conducted to examine the influence of learning efficacy on nursing students' self-confidence. The objective of Paciello et al. 11 was to identify self-efficacy configurations in different domains (i.e., emotional, social, and self-regulated learning) in a sample of university students using a person-centered approach. The role of university students’ various conceptions of learning in their academic self-efficacy in the domain of physics is initially explored 12 . Kumar et al. 13 investigated factors predicting students’ behavioral intentions towards the continuous use of mobile learning. Other influential work includes 14 .

Many studies have focused on social networking tools such as Facebook and MySpace 15 , 16 . Teachers are concerned that the setup and use of social media apps take up too much of their time, may have plagiarism and privacy issues, and contribute little to actual student learning outcomes; they often consider them redundant or simply not conducive to better learning outcomes 17 . Cao et al. 18 proposed that the central questions in addressing the positive and negative pitfalls of social media on teaching and learning are whether the use of social media in teaching and learning enhances educational effectiveness, and what motivates university teachers to use social media in teaching and learning. Maloney et al. 3 argued that social media can further improve the higher education teaching and learning environment, where students no longer access social media to access course information. Many studies in the past have shown that the use of modern IT in the classroom has increased over the past few years; however, it is still limited mainly to content-driven use, such as accessing course materials, so with the emergence of social media in students’ everyday lives 2 , we need to focus on developing students’ learning self-efficacy so that they can This will enable students to 'turn the tables and learn to learn on their own. Learning self-efficacy is considered an important concept that has a powerful impact on learning outcomes 19 , 20 .

Self-efficacy for learning is vital in teaching students to learn and develop healthily and increasing students' beliefs in the learning process 21 . However, previous studies on social media platforms such as Twitter and Weibo as curriculum support tools have not been further substantiated or analyzed in detail. In addition, the relationship between social media, higher education, and learning self-efficacy has not yet been fully explored by researchers in China. Our research aims to fill this gap in the topic. Our study explored the impact of social media on the learning self-efficacy of Chinese college students. Therefore, it is essential to explore the impact of teachers' use of social media to support teaching and learning on students' learning self-efficacy. Based on educational theory and methodological practice, this study designed a teaching experiment using social media to promote learning self-efficacy by posting an assignment for post-course work on online media to explore the actual impact of social media on university students’ learning self-efficacy. This study examines the impact of a social media-assisted course on university students' learning self-efficacy to explore the positive impact of a social media-assisted course.

Theoretical background

• Social media

Social media has different definitions. Mayfield (2013) first introduced the concept of social media in his book-what is social media? The author summarized the six characteristics of social media: openness, participation, dialogue, communication, interaction, and communication. Mayfield 22 shows that social media is a kind of new media. Its uniqueness is that it can give users great space and freedom to participate in the communication process. Jen (2020) also suggested that the distinguishing feature of social media is that it is “aggregated”. Social media provides users with an interactive service to control their data and information and collaborate and share information 2 . Social media offers opportunities for students to build knowledge and helps them actively create and share information 23 . Millennial students are entering higher education institutions and are accustomed to accessing and using data from the Internet. These individuals go online daily for educational or recreational purposes. Social media is becoming increasingly popular in the lives of everyone, including students and researchers 1 . A previous study has shown that millennials use the Internet as their first source of information and Google as their first choice for finding educational and personal information 24 . Similarly, many institutions encourage teachers to adopt social media applications 25 . Faculty members have also embraced social media applications for personal, professional, and pedagogical purposes 17 .

Social networks allow one to create a personal profile and build various networks that connect him/her to family, friends, and other colleagues. Users use these sites to stay in touch with their friends, make plans, make new friends, or connect with someone online. Therefore, extending this concept, these sites can establish academic connections or promote cooperation and collaboration in higher education classrooms 2 . This study defines social media as an interactive community of users' information sharing and social activities built on the technology of the Internet. Because the concept of social media is broad, its connotations are consistent. Research shows that Meaning and Linking are the two key elements that make up social media existence. Users and individual media outlets generate social media content and use it as a platform to get it out there. Social media distribution is based on social relationships and has a better platform for personal information and relationship management systems. Examples of social media applications include Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, YouTube, Flickr, Skype, Wiki, blogs, Delicious, Second Life, open online course sites, SMS, online games, mobile applications, and more 18 . Ajjan and Hartshorne 2 investigated the intentions of 136 faculty members at a US university to adopt Web 2.0 technologies as tools in their courses. They found that integrating Web 2.0 technologies into the classroom learning environment effectively increased student satisfaction with the course and improved their learning and writing skills. His research focused on improving the perceived usefulness, ease of use, compatibility of Web 2.0 applications, and instructor self-efficacy. The social computing impact of formal education and training and informal learning communities suggested that learning web 2.0 helps users to acquire critical competencies, and promotes technological, pedagogical, and organizational innovation, arguing that social media has a variety of learning content 26 . Users can post digital content online, enabling learners to tap into tacit knowledge while supporting collaboration between learners and teachers. Cao and Hong 27 investigated the antecedents and consequences of social media use in teaching among 249 full-time and part-time faculty members, who reported that the factors for using social media in teaching included personal social media engagement and readiness, external pressures; expected benefits; and perceived risks. The types of Innovators, Early adopters, Early majority, Late majority, Laggards, and objectors. Cao et al. 18 studied the educational effectiveness of 168 teachers' use of social media in university teaching. Their findings suggest that social media use has a positive impact on student learning outcomes and satisfaction. Their research model provides educators with ideas on using social media in the education classroom to improve student performance. Maqableh et al. 28 investigated the use of social networking sites by 366 undergraduate students, and they found that weekly use of social networking sites had a significant impact on student's academic performance and that using social networking sites had a significant impact on improving students' effective time management, and awareness of multitasking. All of the above studies indicate the researcher’s research on social media aids in teaching and learning. All of these studies indicate the positive impact of social media on teaching and learning.

• Learning self-efficacy

For the definition of concepts related to learning self-efficacy, scholars have mainly drawn on the idea proposed by Bandura 29 that defines self-efficacy as “the degree to which people feel confident in their ability to use the skills they possess to perform a task”. Self-efficacy is an assessment of a learner’s confidence in his or her ability to use the skills he or she possesses to complete a learning task and is a subjective judgment and feeling about the individual’s ability to control his or her learning behavior and performance 30 . Liu 31 has defined self-efficacy as the belief’s individuals hold about their motivation to act, cognitive ability, and ability to perform to achieve their goals, showing the individual's evaluation and judgment of their abilities. Zhang (2015) showed that learning efficacy is regarded as the degree of belief and confidence that expresses the success of learning. Yan 32 showed the extent to which learning self-efficacy is viewed as an individual. Pan 33 suggested that learning self-efficacy in an online learning environment is a belief that reflects the learner's ability to succeed in the online learning process. Kang 34 believed that learning self-efficacy is the learner's confidence and belief in his or her ability to complete a learning task. Huang 35 considered self-efficacy as an individual’s self-assessment of his or her ability to complete a particular task or perform a specific behavior and the degree of confidence in one’s ability to achieve a specific goal. Kong 36 defined learning self-efficacy as an individual’s judgment of one’s ability to complete academic tasks.

Based on the above analysis, we found that scholars' focus on learning self-efficacy is on learning behavioral efficacy and learning ability efficacy, so this study divides learning self-efficacy into learning behavioral efficacy and learning ability efficacy for further analysis and research 37 , 38 . Search the CNKI database and ProQuest Dissertations for keywords such as “design students’ learning self-efficacy”, “design classroom self-efficacy”, “design learning self-efficacy”, and other keywords. There are few relevant pieces of literature about design majors. Qiu 39 showed that mobile learning-assisted classroom teaching can control the source of self-efficacy from many aspects, thereby improving students’ sense of learning efficacy and helping middle and lower-level students improve their sense of learning efficacy from all dimensions. Yin and Xu 40 argued that the three elements of the network environment—“learning content”, “learning support”, and “social structure of learning”—all have an impact on university students’ learning self-efficacy. Duo et al. 41 recommend that learning activities based on the mobile network learning community increase the trust between students and the sense of belonging in the learning community, promote mutual communication and collaboration between students, and encourage each other to stimulate their learning motivation. In the context of social media applications, self-efficacy refers to the level of confidence that teachers can successfully use social media applications in the classroom 18 . Researchers have found that self-efficacy is related to social media applications 42 . Students had positive experiences with social media applications through content enhancement, creativity experiences, connectivity enrichment, and collaborative engagement 26 . Students who wish to communicate with their tutors in real-time find social media tools such as web pages, blogs, and virtual interactions very satisfying 27 . Overall, students report their enjoyment of different learning processes through social media applications; simultaneously, they show satisfactory tangible achievement of tangible learning outcomes 18 . According to Bandura's 'triadic interaction theory’, Bian 43 and Shi 44 divided learning self-efficacy into two main elements, basic competence, and control, where basic competence includes the individual's sense of effort, competence, the individual sense of the environment, and the individual's sense of control over behavior. The primary sense of competence includes the individual's Sense of effort, competence, environment, and control over behavior. In this study, learning self-efficacy is divided into Learning behavioral efficacy and Learning ability efficacy. Learning behavioral efficacy includes individuals' sense of effort, environment, and control; learning ability efficacy includes individuals' sense of ability, belief, and interest.

In Fig.  1 , learning self-efficacy includes learning behavior efficacy and learning ability efficacy, in which the learning behavior efficacy is determined by the sense of effort, the sense of environment, the sense of control, and the learning ability efficacy is determined by the sense of ability, sense of belief, sense of interest. “Sense of effort” is the understanding of whether one can study hard. Self-efficacy includes the estimation of self-effort and the ability, adaptability, and creativity shown in a particular situation. One with a strong sense of learning self-efficacy thinks they can study hard and focus on tasks 44 . “Sense of environment” refers to the individual’s feeling of their learning environment and grasp of the environment. The individual is the creator of the environment. A person’s feeling and grasp of the environment reflect the strength of his sense of efficacy to some extent. A person with a shared sense of learning self-efficacy is often dissatisfied with his environment, but he cannot do anything about it. He thinks the environment can only dominate him. A person with a high sense of learning self-efficacy will be more satisfied with his school and think that his teachers like him and are willing to study in school 44 . “Sense of control” is an individual’s sense of control over learning activities and learning behavior. It includes the arrangement of individual learning time, whether they can control themselves from external interference, and so on. A person with a strong sense of self-efficacy will feel that he is the master of action and can control the behavior and results of learning. Such a person actively participates in various learning activities. When he encounters difficulties in learning, he thinks he can find a way to solve them, is not easy to be disturbed by the outside world, and can arrange his own learning time. The opposite is the sense of losing control of learning behavior 44 . “Sense of ability” includes an individual’s perception of their natural abilities, expectations of learning outcomes, and perception of achieving their learning goals. A person with a high sense of learning self-efficacy will believe that he or she is brighter and more capable in all areas of learning; that he or she is more confident in learning in all subjects. In contrast, people with low learning self-efficacy have a sense of powerlessness. They are self-doubters who often feel overwhelmed by their learning and are less confident that they can achieve the appropriate learning goals 44 . “Sense of belief” is when an individual knows why he or she is doing something, knows where he or she is going to learn, and does not think before he or she even does it: What if I fail? These are meaningless, useless questions. A person with a high sense of learning self-efficacy is more robust, less afraid of difficulties, and more likely to reach their learning goals. A person with a shared sense of learning self-efficacy, on the other hand, is always going with the flow and is uncertain about the outcome of their learning, causing them to fall behind. “Sense of interest” is a person's tendency to recognize and study the psychological characteristics of acquiring specific knowledge. It is an internal force that can promote people's knowledge and learning. It refers to a person's positive cognitive tendency and emotional state of learning. A person with a high sense of self-efficacy in learning will continue to concentrate on studying and studying, thereby improving learning. However, one with low learning self-efficacy will have psychology such as not being proactive about learning, lacking passion for learning, and being impatient with learning. The elements of learning self-efficacy can be quantified and detailed in the following Fig.  1 .

Learning self-efficacy research structure in this paper.

Research participants

All the procedures were conducted in adherence to the guidelines and regulations set by the institution. Prior to initiating the study, informed consent was obtained in writing from the participants, and the Institutional Review Board for Behavioral and Human Movement Sciences at Nanning Normal University granted approval for all protocols.

Two parallel classes are pre-selected as experimental subjects in our study, one as the experimental group and one as the control group. Social media assisted classroom teaching to intervene in the experimental group, while the control group did not intervene. When selecting the sample, it is essential to consider, as far as possible, the shortcomings of not using randomization to select or assign the study participants, resulting in unequal experimental and control groups. When selecting the experimental subjects, classes with no significant differences in initial status and external conditions, i.e. groups with homogeneity, should be selected. Our study finally decided to select a total of 44 students from Class 2021 Design 1 and a total of 29 students from Class 2021 Design 2, a total of 74 students from Nanning Normal University, as the experimental subjects. The former served as the experimental group, and the latter served as the control group. 73 questionnaires are distributed to measure before the experiment, and 68 are returned, with a return rate of 93.15%. According to the statistics, there were 8 male students and 34 female students in the experimental group, making a total of 44 students (mirrors the demographic trends within the humanities and arts disciplines from which our sample was drawn); there are 10 male students and 16 female students in the control group, making a total of 26 students, making a total of 68 students in both groups. The sample of those who took the course were mainly sophomores, with a small number of first-year students and juniors, which may be related to the nature of the subject of this course and the course system offered by the university. From the analysis of students' majors, liberal arts students in the experimental group accounted for the majority, science students and art students accounted for a small part. In contrast, the control group had more art students, and liberal arts students and science students were small. In the daily self-study time, the experimental and control groups are 2–3 h. The demographic information of research participants is shown in Table 1 .

Research procedure

Firstly, the ADDIE model is used for the innovative design of the teaching method of the course. The number of students in the experimental group was 44, 8 male and 35 females; the number of students in the control group was 29, 10 male and 19 females. Secondly, the classes are targeted at students and applied. Thirdly, the course for both the experimental and control classes is a convenient and practice-oriented course, with the course title “Graphic Design and Production”, which focuses on learning the graphic design software Photoshop. The course uses different cases to explain in detail the process and techniques used to produce these cases using Photoshop, and incorporates practical experience as well as relevant knowledge in the process, striving to achieve precise and accurate operational steps; at the end of the class, the teacher assigns online assignments to be completed on social media, allowing students to post their edited software tutorials online so that students can master the software functions. The teacher assigns online assignments to be completed on social media at the end of the lesson, allowing students to post their editing software tutorials online so that they can master the software functions and production skills, inspire design inspiration, develop design ideas and improve their design skills, and improve students' learning self-efficacy through group collaboration and online interaction. Fourthly, pre-tests and post-tests are conducted in the experimental and control classes before the experiment. Fifthly, experimental data are collected, analyzed, and summarized.

We use a questionnaire survey to collect data. Self-efficacy is a person’s subjective judgment on whether one can successfully perform a particular achievement. American psychologist Albert Bandura first proposed it. To understand the improvement effect of students’ self-efficacy after the experimental intervention, this work questionnaire was referenced by the author from “Self-efficacy” “General Perceived Self Efficacy Scale” (General Perceived Self Efficacy Scale) German psychologist Schwarzer and Jerusalem (1995) and “Academic Self-Efficacy Questionnaire”, a well-known Chinese scholar Liang 45 .  The questionnaire content is detailed in the supplementary information . A pre-survey of the questionnaire is conducted here. The second-year students of design majors collected 32 questionnaires, eliminated similar questions based on the data, and compiled them into a formal survey scale. The scale consists of 54 items, 4 questions about basic personal information, and 50 questions about learning self-efficacy. The Likert five-point scale is the questionnaire used in this study. The answers are divided into “completely inconsistent", “relatively inconsistent”, “unsure”, and “relatively consistent”. The five options of “Completely Meet” and “Compliant” will count as 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 points, respectively. Divided into a sense of ability (Q5–Q14), a sense of effort (Q15–Q20), a sense of environment (Q21–Q28), a sense of control (Q29–Q36), a sense of Interest (Q37–Q45), a sense of belief (Q46–Q54). To demonstrate the scientific effectiveness of the experiment, and to further control the influence of confounding factors on the experimental intervention. This article thus sets up a control group as a reference. Through the pre-test and post-test in different periods, comparison of experimental data through pre-and post-tests to illustrate the effects of the intervention.

Reliability indicates the consistency of the results of a measurement scale (See Table 2 ). It consists of intrinsic and extrinsic reliability, of which intrinsic reliability is essential. Using an internal consistency reliability test scale, a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of reliability statistics greater than or equal to 0.9 indicates that the scale has good reliability, 0.8–0.9 indicates good reliability, 7–0.8 items are acceptable. Less than 0.7 means to discard some items in the scale 46 . This study conducted a reliability analysis on the effects of the related 6-dimensional pre-test survey to illustrate the reliability of the questionnaire.

From the Table 2 , the Cronbach alpha coefficients for the pre-test, sense of effort, sense of environment, sense of control, sense of interest, sense of belief, and the total questionnaire, were 0.919, 0.839, 0.848, 0.865, 0.852, 0.889 and 0.958 respectively. The post-test Cronbach alpha coefficients were 0.898, 0.888, 0.886, 0.889, 0.900, 0.893 and 0.970 respectively. The Cronbach alpha coefficients were all greater than 0.8, indicating a high degree of reliability of the measurement data.

The validity, also known as accuracy, reflects how close the measurement result is to the “true value”. Validity includes structure validity, content validity, convergent validity, and discriminative validity. Because the experiment is a small sample study, we cannot do any specific factorization. KMO and Bartlett sphericity test values are an important part of structural validity. Indicator, general validity evaluation (KMO value above 0.9, indicating very good validity; 0.8–0.9, indicating good validity; 0.7–0.8 validity is good; 0.6–0.7 validity is acceptable; 0.5–0.6 means poor validity; below 0.45 means that some items should be abandoned.

Table 3 shows that the KMO values of ability, effort, environment, control, interest, belief, and the total questionnaire are 0.911, 0.812, 0.778, 0.825, 0.779, 0.850, 0.613, and the KMO values of the post-test are respectively. The KMO values are 0.887, 0.775, 0.892, 0.868, 0.862, 0.883, 0.715. KMO values are basically above 0.8, and all are greater than 0.6. This result indicates that the validity is acceptable, the scale has a high degree of reasonableness, and the valid data.

In the graphic design and production (professional design course), we will learn the practical software with cases. After class, we will share knowledge on the self-media platform. We will give face-to-face computer instruction offline from 8:00 to 11:20 every Wednesday morning for 16 weeks. China's top online sharing platform (APP) is Tik Tok, micro-blog (Micro Blog) and Xiao hong shu. The experiment began on September 1, 2022, and conducted the pre-questionnaire survey simultaneously. At the end of the course, on January 6, 2023, the post questionnaire survey was conducted. A total of 74 questionnaires were distributed in this study, recovered 74 questionnaires. After excluding the invalid questionnaires with incomplete filling and wrong answers, 68 valid questionnaires were obtained, with an effective rate of 91%, meeting the test requirements. Then, use the social science analysis software SPSS Statistics 26 to analyze the data: (1) descriptive statistical analysis of the dimensions of learning self-efficacy; (2) Using correlation test to analyze the correlation between learning self-efficacy and the use of social media; (3) This study used a comparative analysis of group differences to detect the influence of learning self-efficacy on various dimensions of social media and design courses. For data processing and analysis, use the spss26 version software and frequency statistics to create statistics on the basic situation of the research object and the basic situation of the use of live broadcast. The reliability scale analysis (internal consistency test) and use Bartlett's sphericity test to illustrate the reliability and validity of the questionnaire and the individual differences between the control group and the experimental group in demographic variables (gender, grade, Major, self-study time per day) are explained by cross-analysis (chi-square test). In the experimental group and the control group, the pre-test, post-test, before-and-after test of the experimental group and the control group adopt independent sample T-test and paired sample T-test to illustrate the effect of the experimental intervention (The significance level of the test is 0.05 two-sided).

Results and discussion

Comparison of pre-test and post-test between groups.

To study whether the data of the experimental group and the control group are significantly different in the pre-test and post-test mean of sense of ability, sense of effort, sense of environment, sense of control, sense of interest, and sense of belief. The research for this situation uses an independent sample T-test and an independent sample. The test needs to meet some false parameters, such as normality requirements. Generally passing the normality test index requirements are relatively strict, so it can be relaxed to obey an approximately normal distribution. If there is serious skewness distribution, replace it with the nonparametric test. Variables are required to be continuous variables. The six variables in this study define continuous variables. The variable value information is independent of each other. Therefore, we use the independent sample T-test.

From the Table 4 , a pre-test found that there was no statistically significant difference between the experimental group and the control group at the 0.05 confidence level ( p  > 0.05) for perceptions of sense of ability, sense of effort, sense of environment, sense of control, sense of interest, and sense of belief. Before the experiment, the two groups of test groups have the same quality in measuring self-efficacy. The experimental class and the control class are homogeneous groups. Table 5 shows the independent samples t-test for the post-test, used to compare the experimental and control groups on six items, including the sense of ability, sense of effort, sense of environment, sense of control, sense of interest, and sense of belief.

The experimental and control groups have statistically significant scores ( p  < 0.05) for sense of ability, sense of effort, sense of environment, sense of control, sense of interest, and sense of belief, and the experimental and control groups have statistically significant scores (t = 3.177, p  = 0.002) for a sense of competence. (t = 3.177, p  = 0.002) at the 0.01 level, with the experimental group scoring significantly higher (3.91 ± 0.51) than the control group (3.43 ± 0.73). The experimental group and the control group showed significance for the perception of effort at the 0.01 confidence level (t = 2.911, p  = 0.005), with the experimental group scoring significantly higher (3.88 ± 0.66) than the control group scoring significantly higher (3.31 ± 0.94). The experimental and control groups show significance at the 0.05 level (t = 2.451, p  = 0.017) for the sense of environment, with the experimental group scoring significantly higher (3.95 ± 0.61) than the control group scoring significantly higher (3.58 ± 0.62). The experimental and control groups showed significance for sense of control at the 0.05 level of significance (t = 2.524, p  = 0.014), and the score for the experimental group (3.76 ± 0.67) would be significantly higher than the score for the control group (3.31 ± 0.78). The experimental and control groups showed significance at the 0.01 level for sense of interest (t = 2.842, p  = 0.006), and the experimental group's score (3.87 ± 0.61) would be significantly higher than the control group's score (3.39 ± 0.77). The experimental and control groups showed significance at the 0.01 level for the sense of belief (t = 3.377, p  = 0.001), and the experimental group would have scored significantly higher (4.04 ± 0.52) than the control group (3.56 ± 0.65). Therefore, we can conclude that the experimental group's post-test significantly affects the mean scores of sense of ability, sense of effort, sense of environment, sense of control, sense of interest, and sense of belief. A social media-assisted course has a positive impact on students' self-efficacy.

Comparison of pre-test and post-test of each group

The paired-sample T-test is an extension of the single-sample T-test. The purpose is to explore whether the means of related (paired) groups are significantly different. There are four standard paired designs: (1) Before and after treatment of the same subject Data, (2) Data from two different parts of the same subject, (3) Test results of the same sample with two methods or instruments, 4. Two matched subjects receive two treatments, respectively. This study belongs to the first type, the 6 learning self-efficacy dimensions of the experimental group and the control group is measured before and after different periods.

Paired t-tests is used to analyze whether there is a significant improvement in the learning self-efficacy dimension in the experimental group after the experimental social media-assisted course intervention. In Table 6 , we can see that the six paired data groups showed significant differences ( p  < 0.05) in the pre and post-tests of sense of ability, sense of effort, sense of environment, sense of control, sense of interest, and sense of belief. There is a level of significance of 0.01 (t = − 4.540, p  = 0.000 < 0.05) before and after the sense of ability, the score after the sense of ability (3.91 ± 0.51), and the score before the Sense of ability (3.41 ± 0.55). The level of significance between the pre-test and post-test of sense of effort is 0.01 (t = − 4.002, p  = 0.000). The score of the sense of effort post-test (3.88 ± 0.66) will be significantly higher than the average score of the sense of effort pre-test (3.31 ± 0.659). The significance level between the pre-test and post-test Sense of environment is 0.01 (t = − 3.897, p  = 0.000). The average score for post- Sense of environment (3.95 ± 0.61) will be significantly higher than that of sense of environment—the average score of the previous test (3.47 ± 0.44). The average value of a post- sense of control (3.76 ± 0.67) will be significantly higher than the average of the front side of the Sense of control value (3.27 ± 0.52). The sense of interest pre-test and post-test showed a significance level of 0.01 (− 4.765, p  = 0.000), and the average value of Sense of interest post-test was 3.87 ± 0.61. It would be significantly higher than the average value of the Sense of interest (3.25 ± 0.59), the significance between the pre-test and post-test of belief sensing is 0.01 level (t = − 3.939, p  = 0.000). Thus, the average value of a post-sense of belief (4.04 ± 0.52) will be significantly higher than that of a pre-sense of belief Average value (3.58 ± 0.58). After the experimental group’s post-test, the scores for the Sense of ability, effort, environment, control, interest, and belief before the comparison experiment increased significantly. This result has a significant improvement effect. Table 7 shows that the control group did not show any differences in the pre and post-tests using paired t-tests on the dimensions of learning self-efficacy such as sense of ability, sense of effort, sense of environment, sense of control, sense of interest, and sense of belief ( p  > 0.05). It shows no experimental intervention for the control group, and it does not produce a significant effect.

The purpose of this study aims to explore the impact of social media use on college students' learning self-efficacy, examine the changes in the elements of college students' learning self-efficacy before and after the experiment, and make an empirical study to enrich the theory. This study developed an innovative design for course teaching methods using the ADDIE model. The design process followed a series of model rules of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation, as well as conducted a descriptive statistical analysis of the learning self-efficacy of design undergraduates. Using questionnaires and data analysis, the correlation between the various dimensions of learning self-efficacy is tested. We also examined the correlation between the two factors, and verifies whether there was a causal relationship between the two factors.

Based on prior research and the results of existing practice, a learning self-efficacy is developed for university students and tested its reliability and validity. The scale is used to pre-test the self-efficacy levels of the two subjects before the experiment, and a post-test of the self-efficacy of the two groups is conducted. By measuring and investigating the learning self-efficacy of the study participants before the experiment, this study determined that there was no significant difference between the experimental group and the control group in terms of sense of ability, sense of effort, sense of environment, sense of control, sense of interest, and sense of belief. Before the experiment, the two test groups had homogeneity in measuring the dimensionality of learning self-efficacy. During the experiment, this study intervened in social media assignments for the experimental group. The experiment used learning methods such as network assignments, mutual aid communication, mutual evaluation of assignments, and group discussions. After the experiment, the data analysis showed an increase in learning self-efficacy in the experimental group compared to the pre-test. With the test time increased, the learning self-efficacy level of the control group decreased slightly. It shows that social media can promote learning self-efficacy to a certain extent. This conclusion is similar to Cao et al. 18 , who suggested that social media would improve educational outcomes.

We have examined the differences between the experimental and control group post-tests on six items, including the sense of ability, sense of effort, sense of environment, sense of control, sense of interest, and sense of belief. This result proves that a social media-assisted course has a positive impact on students' learning self-efficacy. Compared with the control group, students in the experimental group had a higher interest in their major. They showed that they liked to share their learning experiences and solve difficulties in their studies after class. They had higher motivation and self-directed learning ability after class than students in the control group. In terms of a sense of environment, students in the experimental group were more willing to share their learning with others, speak boldly, and participate in the environment than students in the control group.

The experimental results of this study showed that the experimental group showed significant improvement in the learning self-efficacy dimensions after the experimental intervention in the social media-assisted classroom, with significant increases in the sense of ability, sense of effort, sense of environment, sense of control, sense of interest and sense of belief compared to the pre-experimental scores. This result had a significant improvement effect. Evidence that a social media-assisted course has a positive impact on students' learning self-efficacy. Most of the students recognized the impact of social media on their learning self-efficacy, such as encouragement from peers, help from teachers, attention from online friends, and recognition of their achievements, so that they can gain a sense of achievement that they do not have in the classroom, which stimulates their positive perception of learning and is more conducive to the awakening of positive effects. This phenomenon is in line with Ajjan and Hartshorne 2 . They argue that social media provides many opportunities for learners to publish their work globally, which brings many benefits to teaching and learning. The publication of students' works online led to similar positive attitudes towards learning and improved grades and motivation. This study also found that students in the experimental group in the post-test controlled their behavior, became more interested in learning, became more purposeful, had more faith in their learning abilities, and believed that their efforts would be rewarded. This result is also in line with Ajjan and Hartshorne's (2008) indication that integrating Web 2.0 technologies into classroom learning environments can effectively increase students' satisfaction with the course and improve their learning and writing skills.

We only selected students from one university to conduct a survey, and the survey subjects were self-selected. Therefore, the external validity and generalizability of our study may be limited. Despite the limitations, we believe this study has important implications for researchers and educators. The use of social media is the focus of many studies that aim to assess the impact and potential of social media in learning and teaching environments. We hope that this study will help lay the groundwork for future research on the outcomes of social media utilization. In addition, future research should further examine university support in encouraging teachers to begin using social media and university classrooms in supporting social media (supplementary file 1 ).

The present study has provided preliminary evidence on the positive association between social media integration in education and increased learning self-efficacy among college students. However, several avenues for future research can be identified to extend our understanding of this relationship.

Firstly, replication studies with larger and more diverse samples are needed to validate our findings across different educational contexts and cultural backgrounds. This would enhance the generalizability of our results and provide a more robust foundation for the use of social media in teaching. Secondly, longitudinal investigations should be conducted to explore the sustained effects of social media use on learning self-efficacy. Such studies would offer insights into how the observed benefits evolve over time and whether they lead to improved academic performance or other relevant outcomes. Furthermore, future research should consider the exploration of potential moderators such as individual differences in students' learning styles, prior social media experience, and psychological factors that may influence the effectiveness of social media in education. Additionally, as social media platforms continue to evolve rapidly, it is crucial to assess the impact of emerging features and trends on learning self-efficacy. This includes an examination of advanced tools like virtual reality, augmented reality, and artificial intelligence that are increasingly being integrated into social media environments. Lastly, there is a need for research exploring the development and evaluation of instructional models that effectively combine traditional teaching methods with innovative uses of social media. This could guide educators in designing courses that maximize the benefits of social media while minimizing potential drawbacks.

In conclusion, the current study marks an important step in recognizing the potential of social media as an educational tool. Through continued research, we can further unpack the mechanisms by which social media can enhance learning self-efficacy and inform the development of effective educational strategies in the digital age.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Rasheed, M. I. et al. Usage of social media, student engagement, and creativity: The role of knowledge sharing behavior and cyberbullying. Comput. Educ. 159 , 104002 (2020).

Article   Google Scholar  

Ajjan, H. & Hartshorne, R. Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. Internet High. Educ. 11 , 71–80 (2008).

Maloney, E. J. What web 2.0 can teach us about learning. The Chronicle of Higher Education 53 , B26–B27 (2007).

Ustun, A. B., Karaoglan-Yilmaz, F. G. & Yilmaz, R. Educational UTAUT-based virtual reality acceptance scale: A validity and reliability study. Virtual Real. 27 , 1063–1076 (2023).

Schunk, D. H. Self-efficacy and classroom learning. Psychol. Sch. 22 , 208–223 (1985).

Cheung, W., Li, E. Y. & Yee, L. W. Multimedia learning system and its effect on self-efficacy in database modeling and design: An exploratory study. Comput. Educ. 41 , 249–270 (2003).

Bates, R. & Khasawneh, S. Self-efficacy and college students’ perceptions and use of online learning systems. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23 , 175–191 (2007).

Shen, D., Cho, M.-H., Tsai, C.-L. & Marra, R. Unpacking online learning experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. Internet High. Educ. 19 , 10–17 (2013).

Chiu, S.-I. The relationship between life stress and smartphone addiction on taiwanese university student: A mediation model of learning self-efficacy and social self-Efficacy. Comput. Hum. Behav. 34 , 49–57 (2014).

Kim, S.-O. & Kang, B.-H. The influence of nursing students’ learning experience, recognition of importance and learning self-efficacy for core fundamental nursing skills on their self-confidence. J. Korea Acad.-Ind. Coop. Soc. 17 , 172–182 (2016).

Google Scholar  

Paciello, M., Ghezzi, V., Tramontano, C., Barbaranelli, C. & Fida, R. Self-efficacy configurations and wellbeing in the academic context: A person-centred approach. Pers. Individ. Differ. 99 , 16–21 (2016).

Suprapto, N., Chang, T.-S. & Ku, C.-H. Conception of learning physics and self-efficacy among Indonesian University students. J. Balt. Sci. Educ. 16 , 7–19 (2017).

Kumar, J. A., Bervell, B., Annamalai, N. & Osman, S. Behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the role of self-efficacy, subjective norm, and WhatsApp use habit. IEEE Access 8 , 208058–208074 (2020).

Fisk, J. E. & Warr, P. Age-related impairment in associative learning: The role of anxiety, arousal and learning self-efficacy. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 21 , 675–686 (1996).

Pence, H. E. Preparing for the real web generation. J. Educ. Technol. Syst. 35 , 347–356 (2007).

Hu, J., Lee, J. & Yi, X. Blended knowledge sharing model in design professional. Sci. Rep. 13 , 16326 (2023).

Article   ADS   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Moran, M., Seaman, J. & Tintikane, H. Blogs, wikis, podcasts and Facebook: How today’s higher education faculty use social media, vol. 22, 1–28 (Pearson Learning Solutions. Retrieved December, 2012).

Cao, Y., Ajjan, H. & Hong, P. Using social media applications for educational outcomes in college teaching: A structural equation analysis: Social media use in teaching. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 44 , 581–593 (2013).

Artino, A. R. Academic self-efficacy: From educational theory to instructional practice. Perspect. Med. Educ. 1 , 76–85 (2012).

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Pajares, F. Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Rev. Educ. Res. 66 , 543–578 (1996).

Zhao, Z. Classroom Teaching Design of Layout Design Based on Self Efficacy Theory (Tianjin University of Technology and Education, 2021).

Yılmaz, F. G. K. & Yılmaz, R. Exploring the role of sociability, sense of community and course satisfaction on students’ engagement in flipped classroom supported by facebook groups. J. Comput. Educ. 10 , 135–162 (2023).

Nguyen, N. P., Yan, G. & Thai, M. T. Analysis of misinformation containment in online social networks. Comput. Netw. 57 , 2133–2146 (2013).

Connaway, L. S., Radford, M. L., Dickey, T. J., Williams, J. D. A. & Confer, P. Sense-making and synchronicity: Information-seeking behaviors of millennials and baby boomers. Libri 58 , 123–135 (2008).

Wankel, C., Marovich, M. & Stanaityte, J. Cutting-edge social media approaches to business education : teaching with LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, Second Life, and blogs . (Global Management Journal, 2010).

Redecker, C., Ala-Mutka, K. & Punie, Y. Learning 2.0: The impact of social media on learning in Europe. Policy brief. JRC Scientific and Technical Report. EUR JRC56958 EN . Available from http://bit.ly/cljlpq [Accessed 6 th February 2011] 6 (2010).

Cao, Y. & Hong, P. Antecedents and consequences of social media utilization in college teaching: A proposed model with mixed-methods investigation. Horizon 19 , 297–306 (2011).

Maqableh, M. et al. The impact of social media networks websites usage on students’ academic performance. Commun. Netw. 7 , 159–171 (2015).

Bandura, A. Self-Efficacy (Worth Publishers, 1997).

Karaoglan-Yilmaz, F. G., Ustun, A. B., Zhang, K. & Yilmaz, R. Metacognitive awareness, reflective thinking, problem solving, and community of inquiry as predictors of academic self-efficacy in blended learning: A correlational study. Turk. Online J. Distance Educ. 24 , 20–36 (2023).

Liu, W. Self-efficacy Level and Analysis of Influencing Factors on Non-English Major Bilingual University Students—An Investigation Based on Three (Xinjiang Normal University, 2015).

Yan, W. Influence of College Students’ Positive Emotions on Learning Engagement and Academic Self-efficacy (Shanghai Normal University, 2016).

Pan, J. Relational Model Construction between College Students’ Learning Self-efficacy and Their Online Autonomous Learning Ability (Northeast Normal University, 2017).

Kang, Y. The Study on the Relationship Between Learning Motivation, Self-efficacy and Burnout in College Students (Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 2018).

Huang, L. A Study on the Relationship between Chinese Learning Efficacy and Learning Motivation of Foreign Students in China (Huaqiao University, 2018).

Kong, W. Research on the Mediating Role of Undergraduates’ Learning Self-efficacy in the Relationship between Professional Identification and Learning Burnout (Shanghai Normal University, 2019).

Kuo, T. M., Tsai, C. C. & Wang, J. C. Linking web-based learning self-efficacy and learning engagement in MOOCs: The role of online academic hardiness. Internet High. Educ. 51 , 100819 (2021).

Zhan, Y. A Study of the Impact of Social Media Use and Dependence on Real-Life Social Interaction Among University Students (Shanghai International Studies University, 2020).

Qiu, S. A study on mobile learning to assist in developing English learning effectiveness among university students. J. Lanzhou Inst. Educ. 33 , 138–140 (2017).

Yin, R. & Xu, D. A study on the relationship between online learning environment and university students’ learning self-efficacy. E-educ. Res. 9 , 46–52 (2011).

Duo, Z., Zhao, W. & Ren, Y. A New paradigm for building mobile online learning communities: A perspective on the development of self-regulated learning efficacy among university students, in Modern distance education 10–17 (2019).

Park, S. Y., Nam, M.-W. & Cha, S.-B. University students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model: Factors related to use mobile learning. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 43 , 592–605 (2012).

Bian, Y. Development and application of the Learning Self-Efficacy Scale (East China Normal University, 2003).

Shi, X. Between Life Stress and Smartphone Addiction on Taiwanese University Student (Southwest University, 2010).

Liang, Y. Study On Achievement Goals、Attribution Styles and Academic Self-efficacy of Collage Students (Central China Normal University, 2000).

Qiu, H. Quantitative Research and Statistical Analysis (Chongqing University Press, 2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the 2023 Guangxi University Young and middle-aged Teachers' Basic Research Ability Enhancement Project—“Research on Innovative Communication Strategies and Effects of Zhuang Traditional Crafts from the Perspective of the Metaverse” (Grant Nos. 2023KY0385), and the special project on innovation and entrepreneurship education in universities under the “14th Five-Year Plan” for Guangxi Education Science in 2023, titled “One Core, Two Directions, Three Integrations - Strategy and Practical Research on Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education in Local Universities” (Grant Nos. 2023ZJY1955), and the 2023 Guangxi Higher Education Undergraduate Teaching Reform General Project (Category B) “Research on the Construction and Development of PBL Teaching Model in Advertising” (Grant Nos.2023JGB294), and the 2022 Guangxi Higher Education Undergraduate Teaching Reform Project (General Category A) “Exploration and Practical Research on Public Art Design Courses in Colleges and Universities under Great Aesthetic Education” (Grant Nos. 2022JGA251), and the 2023 Guangxi Higher Education Undergraduate Teaching Reform Project Key Project “Research and Practice on the Training of Interdisciplinary Composite Talents in Design Majors Based on the Concept of Specialization and Integration—Taking Guangxi Institute of Traditional Crafts as an Example” (Grant Nos. 2023JGZ147), and the2024 Nanning Normal University Undergraduate Teaching Reform Project “Research and Practice on the Application of “Guangxi Intangible Cultural Heritage” in Packaging Design Courses from the Ideological and Political Perspective of the Curriculum” (Grant Nos. 2024JGX048),and the 2023 Hubei Normal University Teacher Teaching Reform Research Project (Key Project) -Curriculum Development for Improving Pre-service Music Teachers' Teaching Design Capabilities from the Perspective of OBE (Grant Nos. 2023014), and the 2023 Guangxi Education Science “14th Five-Year Plan” special project: “Specialized Integration” Model and Practice of Art and Design Majors in Colleges and Universities in Ethnic Areas Based on the OBE Concept (Grant Nos. 2023ZJY1805), and the 2024 Guangxi University Young and Middle-aged Teachers’ Scientific Research Basic Ability Improvement Project “Research on the Integration Path of University Entrepreneurship and Intangible Inheritance - Taking Liu Sanjie IP as an Example” (Grant Nos. 2024KY0374), and the 2022 Research Project on the Theory and Practice of Ideological and Political Education for College Students in Guangxi - “Party Building + Red”: Practice and Research on the Innovation of Education Model in College Student Dormitories (Grant Nos. 2022SZ028), and the 2021 Guangxi University Young and Middle-aged Teachers’ Scientific Research Basic Ability Improvement Project - "Research on the Application of Ethnic Elements in the Visual Design of Live Broadcast Delivery of Guangxi Local Products" (Grant Nos. 2021KY0891).

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

College of Art and Design, Nanning Normal University, Nanning, 530000, Guangxi, China

Graduate School of Techno Design, Kookmin University, Seoul, 02707, Korea

Yicheng Lai

College of Music, Hubei Normal University, Huangshi, 435000, Hubei, China

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

The contribution of H. to this paper primarily lies in research design and experimental execution. H. was responsible for the overall framework design of the paper, setting research objectives and methods, and actively participating in data collection and analysis during the experimentation process. Furthermore, H. was also responsible for conducting literature reviews and played a crucial role in the writing and editing phases of the paper. L.'s contribution to this paper primarily manifests in theoretical derivation and the discussion section. Additionally, author L. also proposed future research directions and recommendations in the discussion section, aiming to facilitate further research explorations. Y.'s contribution to this paper is mainly reflected in data analysis and result interpretation. Y. was responsible for statistically analyzing the experimental data and employing relevant analytical tools and techniques to interpret and elucidate the data results.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiaying Hu .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary information., rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Hu, J., Lai, Y. & Yi, X. Effectiveness of social media-assisted course on learning self-efficacy. Sci Rep 14 , 10112 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60724-0

Download citation

Received : 02 January 2024

Accepted : 26 April 2024

Published : 02 May 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60724-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Design students
• Online learning
• Design professional

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines . If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

THE EFFECTS OF USING SOCIAL MEDIA TO THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF THE HONOR STUDENTS.docx

Related Papers

Chrysancthus Emmanuel

Mohamed Tejan Tarawally Deen

mohamed deen

Social media appeared to be a very useful tool for students in their college work or lessons as they use them to improve their learning process to communicate effectively with each other, receive university-related issues and get other necessary information. In other words, social media seemed to be modern tools of learning for undergraduates in Sierra Leone. However, their negative effects seemed to be very poor as compared to their positive effects as they described that too much use of social media as a concern, which wastes their time and money. It is suggested that the lecturers, faculties and others social media users, especially Facebook pages owners, disseminate advantageous issues which help students in terms of enhancing their knowledge and information. In addition, no differences were found between students' academic achievements and their positive and negative social media use.

Remedios Kulidtod

Social networking media has been the major source of communication between individuals in the world over, hence, the label cyber-world. This includes Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, Instagram, Flicker, Frienster, Blogs, Podcast, Youtube, Tumblr and Skype, among others. Users of these forms of media made use of such technology gadgets as cell phones, tablets, laptops, desktop computers, and e-readers. Researchers all over the world have varied findings on the effects of these forms of media on the academic performance of students. Those students who used the media wisely, their academic performance improved. However, those who failed to regulate their use of these social networking tools negatively affected their studies which oftentimes led to their addicted use. In general, the study found out that the exposure of the IMEAS students to the social networking media positively affected their academic performance. Hence, the University must implement policies and projects designed for more...

Arjohn Batul

saleh mahmud

Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology

Ryan Gerome Posanso

This study aims to determine the impact of social media on students&#39; academic performance in terms of their grade point average (GPA). This study specifically aimed: (1) to determine the percentage of students using social media in terms of doing research work, doing assignments or projects, and studying, (2) to find out the time students spend on social media, (3) to find out the academic performance of students in terms of GPA, (4) to determine if there is a significant relationship between time spent on social media and academic performance in terms of GPA, (5) to determine if there is a significant relationship between usage of social media and academic performance in terms of GPA. A quantitative approach was employed to support this study, particularly the correlation method was utilized. Survey questionnaires were used to solicit data and information from 35 randomly chosen respondents of the study. This study&#39;s findings revealed that 80% of students used social media ...

Quennie Jane Sayre

The effect of social Media to the academic performance of a students in Our Lady Of Fatima University

Ryan Vincent M Lañada

Using social media has a big effect to the academic performance of a students any different form of social networking sites help the student to make their academic more excellent and awsome. According to Peter (2015) on his research entitled the social media and the academic performance the millions of social networking sites have been transformed the thought. Numerous benefit have been obtained through distant communication through the use of social networking sites. Academic excellence or achievement plays an important role in an individual placement, be it in the academic institutions or job placement. Due to this, many people are concerned with the ways they can enhance their academic achievement.According to Peter (2015) on his research entitled the social media and the academic performance the millions of social networking sites have been transformed the thought. Numerous benefit have been obtained through distant communication through the use of social networking sites. Academic excellence or achievement plays an important role in an individual placement, be it in the academic institutions or job placement. Due to this, many people are concerned with the ways they can enhance their academic achievement.

IAEME PUBLICATION

IAEME Publication

In latest years era has attempted to fulfill its role in helping humanity leading to the good sized medium of interaction within the social world in addition to in teaching and learning. Over the years those in higher training has discover the exciting possibilities new technology carry to institutions, educators and students. Technology has modified the manner people have interaction and has brought about the emergence of an open social platform such as social media that allows the population of this planet earth to connect with each other making the sector a international village. Social media together with Face book, Twitter, Google Plus, and Flickr, are getting used in gaining knowledge of for the purpose of convenient communiqué with different college students and doubtlessly with others out of doors the class such as students of the same topic and subject experts. Web based life utilization among medicinal understudies has additionally seen enormous surge. It is giving therapeutic educationists new ideal models in instructing learning movement. A few situations currently supplement customary up close and personal preparing with web based life workshops, online little gathering work, and even one-on-one coaching. Such exercises in India are restricted right now albeit ongoing information have demonstrated evolving patterns.

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

adlina azizan

Roice Constantino , ronald amores

Felix Williams , Bello O P E Y E M I Stephen

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024