Leptospirosis in cats: Current literature review to guide diagnosis and management

Affiliations.

  • 1 Departament de Medicina i Cirurgia Animals, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain.
  • 2 OIE and National Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Leptospirosis (NRL), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Medical Microbiology, Meibergdreef 39, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • PMID: 32093581
  • DOI: 10.1177/1098612X20903601

Global importance: Leptospirosis is the most widespread zoonosis worldwide. Mammals (eg, rats, horses, cows, pigs, dogs, cats and aquatic species, such as sea lions and northern elephant seals) can all be infected by leptospires. Infection in animals occurs through contact with urine or water contaminated with the bacteria. In people, the disease is acquired mainly from animal sources or through recreational activities in contaminated water.

Practical relevance: Literature on the clinical presentation of leptospirosis in cats is scarce, although it has been demonstrated that cats are susceptible to infection and are capable of developing antibodies. The prevalence of antileptospiral antibodies in cats varies from 4% to 33.3% depending on the geographical location. Urinary shedding of leptospires in naturally infected cats has been reported, with a prevalence of up to 68%. Infection in cats has been associated with the consumption of infected prey, especially rodents. Thus, outdoor cats have a higher risk of becoming infected.

Clinical challenges: Clinical presentation of this disease in cats is rare and it is not known what role cats have in the transmission of leptospirosis. Ongoing work is needed to characterise feline leptospirosis.

Audience: This review is aimed at all veterinarians, both general practitioners who deal with cats on a daily basis in private practice, as well as feline practitioners, since both groups face the challenge of diagnosing and treating infectious and zoonotic diseases.

Evidence base: The current literature on leptospirosis in cats is reviewed. To date, few case reports have been published in the field, and information has mostly been extrapolated from infections in people and dogs. This review is expected to serve as a guide for the diagnosis and management of the disease in cats.

Keywords: Leptospirosis; microscopic agglutination test; real-time PCR; zoonosis.

Publication types

  • Cat Diseases / diagnosis*
  • Cat Diseases / therapy*
  • Leptospirosis / diagnosis
  • Leptospirosis / therapy
  • Leptospirosis / veterinary*

Portal disabled

The portal is not activated.

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • View all journals
  • My Account Login
  • Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • Open access
  • Published: 14 May 2021

Molecular and serological epidemiology of Leptospira infection in cats in Okinawa Island, Japan

  • Tetsuya Kakita 1 ,
  • Yumani Kuba 1 ,
  • Hisako Kyan 1 ,
  • Sho Okano 1   nAff3 ,
  • Masatomo Morita 2 &
  • Nobuo Koizumi 2  

Scientific Reports volume  11 , Article number:  10365 ( 2021 ) Cite this article

2041 Accesses

12 Citations

9 Altmetric

Metrics details

  • Bacterial infection
  • Infectious-disease epidemiology

Leptospirosis is a zoonosis caused by pathogenic Leptospira spp. Cats have been reported to be infected with Leptospira spp. and shed the bacteria in the urine. However, the importance of cats as an infection source for humans remains unclear. In this study, Leptospira infection in cats in Okinawa Prefecture, Japan, where leptospirosis is endemic, was investigated by leptospiral antibody and DNA detection using microscopic agglutination test and nested PCR, respectively. Moreover, multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) were conducted on the Leptospira borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica isolated from cats, black rats, a mongoose, and humans. Anti- Leptospira antibodies were detected in 16.6% (40/241) of the cats tested, and the predominant reactive serogroup was Javanica. The leptospiral flaB gene was detected in 7.1% (3/42) of cat urine samples, and their sequences were identical and identified as L. borgpetersenii . MLST and WGS revealed the genetic relatedness of L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica isolates. This study indicated that most seropositive cats had antibodies against the serogroup Javanica and that cats excreted L. borgpetersenii in the urine after infection. Further, genetic relatedness between cat and human isolates suggests that cats may be a maintenance host for L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica and a source for human infection.

Similar content being viewed by others

leptospirosis in cats current literature review to guide diagnosis and management

Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19

leptospirosis in cats current literature review to guide diagnosis and management

The evolution of SARS-CoV-2

leptospirosis in cats current literature review to guide diagnosis and management

Centralized industrialization of pork in Europe and America contributes to the global spread of Salmonella enterica

Introduction.

Leptospirosis is a zoonotic disease caused by infection with pathogenic spirochetes of the genus Leptospira , composed of 64 species divided into 24 serogroups and more than 300 serovars 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 . Leptospira spp. colonize the proximal renal tubules of maintenance hosts, including wild animals such as rats and boars, livestock such as cattle and pigs, and companion animals such as dogs, and are shed in their urine 2 , 5 , 6 . Humans are infected percutaneously or permucosally with Leptospira spp. by direct contact with the urine of maintenance hosts or by indirect contact with soil or water contaminated with infected urine 3 , 6 , 7 .

Cats have not been considered an important source of Leptospira infection for humans. Besides antibody detection, however, several recent studies from various regions reported that Leptospira spp. were isolated or leptospiral DNAs were detected from cat urine or kidney samples 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ; carriage rate was related to some factors such as rearing style (cat external behavior), climate, and living environment (urban or rural) 15 , 20 . Moreover, leptospiral DNA was continuously detected in the urine of naturally infected cats for 8 months 20 . Although symptomatic cases with polyuria, polydipsia, hematuria, ascites, and diarrhea have been reported, the clinical presentation of leptospirosis in cats is rare, usually mild, or subclinical, and symptoms in feline leptospirosis remain undefined 9 , 13 , 14 , 17 , 20 , 22 . These studies suggest that cats can carry and shed pathogenic Leptospira in urine for a long period after infection. Asymptomatic or uncertain symptoms of infected cats make the diagnosis and appropriate treatment difficult and prevent infected cats from becoming a chronic carrier, resulting in a potential infection source for humans.

Cats are the most common companion animal in Japan. According to a survey conducted by the Japan Pet Food Association, the number of cats has been increasing year by year, and the number of cats raised in Japan is estimated to be 9,778,000 in 2019, higher than that of dogs 23 . Canine leptospirosis and its causative Leptospira spp. have been recently reported 24 , 25 , but the current status of Leptospira infection in cats in Japan remains limited. In the southern Kyushu District, the prevalence of anti- Leptospira antibodies in domestic cats was reported to be 7.7% 26 . In Okinawa Prefecture, the southernmost part of Japan, where leptospirosis is endemic, it was reported 30 years ago that the seroprevalence and isolation rate of Leptospira spp. among cats ranged from 4.8 to 9.1% and 1.0% to 3.1%, respectively 27 , 28 . Although Leptospira spp. were isolated, molecular characterization of the isolates was not performed in these studies.

Understanding the Leptospira genotype-host association in maintenance hosts is important for elucidating and controlling the source for human infection. Currently, molecular typing methods, such as multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and multilocus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA), are the main methods for characterizing Leptospira isolates 1 . As a genotyping method having higher resolution, whole genome sequencing (WGS) has been rapidly developed in recent years. These methods have enabled the understanding of host specificity of certain Leptospira genotypes as well as the geographic structuring of genetic diversity and host switching event in Leptospira spp 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 .

In this study, to clarify Leptospira infection and carriage in cats in Okinawa Island (Okinawa Main Island), anti-leptospiral antibodies in cats were investigated by the microscopic agglutination test (MAT) using 13 reference strains. Leptospiral DNA was detected from cat urine samples by nested PCR. Moreover, MLST and WGS were performed to gain further insights into the genetic relatedness of Leptospira isolates from cats, mongooses, rats, and humans.

Antibodies against Leptospira spp. were detected in 40 of 241 cats (16.6%) included in the analysis. Thirty-seven cats and one cat had antibodies against serogroups Javanica and Hebdomadis, respectively, and two samples were positive for multiple serogroups (Table 1 ). The reciprocal antibody titers for serogroup Javanica ranged from 160 to 2560 (Table 1 ). The antibody-positive samples in the northern, central, and southern regions of Okinawa Island were 15.0% (26/173), 22.0% (9/41), and 18.5% (5/27), respectively. Of the 40 anti-leptospiral antibody-positive cats, 23 were male (19.3%) and 17 were female (13.9%). There were no significant differences between seropositivity and capture area nor between seropositivity and sex. In contrast, the seropositivity varied among the age groups based on weight: 3% (1/33) in kittens, 12.1% (7/58) in juveniles, and 21.3% (32/150) in adults. There was a statistically significant difference in the seropositivity among the age groups ( p  = 0.021), and a trend toward an increase in seropositivity with age was observed ( p  = 0.006).

Leptospiral flaB was detected in 3 of 42 urine samples (7.1%, see Supplementary Fig. S1 online) included in the analysis. All three PCR-positive cats were also positive for antibody against serogroup Javanica with the titers of 320 (2 animals) and 640 (1 animal). All three flaB sequences were identical and identified as L. borgpetersenii (DDBJ accession numbers LC596932–LC596934). Amplification of all seven housekeeping genes for MLST was succeeded in two of the three flaB -positive urine samples (FU18017 and FU18027) and nine strains of L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica (Table 2 ). Their sequence types (STs) were all assigned as ST143 (Fig. 1 ). There were no gross abnormalities in the autopsy findings in the three cats.

figure 1

MST of L. borgpetersenii detected from cat urine samples and L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica strains in this study and 182 L. borgpetersenii strains based on the allelic profiles of the MLST seven housekeeping genes. Each circle represents an individual ST, and the numbers represent ST numbers. Circle sizes correspond to the numbers of strains in each ST. The thickness and the dotting of lines indicate the distance between the circles: a thicker line indicates a closer distance than a thin line, and a thin line denotes a closer distance than a dotted line. The green-colored circle and the ST number in red represent L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica strains and DNAs determined in this study.

Of the six strains subjected to WGS, enough data for comparison were obtained from four strains, OHJ2008-88U, FK-118, 058031, and 078065. Strains isolated from a cat, a mongoose, and humans were clustered with L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica strains isolated from black rats in Okinawa Island sequenced in a previous study 30 (Fig. 2 ).

figure 2

Core genome SNP-based maximum likelihood tree of L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica strains isolated in Japan. The strain Piyasena, belonging to serogroup Javanica serovar Ceylonica, was used as the reference, omitted from the tree. WGS of strains 058031, 078065, FK-118, and OHJ2008-88U was performed in this study, and strains named WFA have been analyzed in a previous study 30 . Black, human isolate; blue, black rat isolate; green, mongoose isolate; red, cat isolate.

Identification of prevalent serovar(s) and their maintenance host(s) and seroprevalence in the host(s) is important for understanding the epidemiology of leptospirosis in a particular geographic region 33 . In the Okinawa Island, which has a subtropical climate, Leptospira spp. have been isolated or detected from various animals such as rat, mouse, shrew, mongoose, wild boar, and dog 24 , 34 , 35 , 36 . The animals excrete the bacteria into the environment where Leptospira spp. can survive and remain infective for several weeks 7 . Humans can get infected with Leptospira spp. through contact with the contaminated environment during recreational activities in rivers and agricultural activities 37 . Therefore, the approach of “One Health” recognizing the interconnection between humans, animals, and their shared environment is important to elucidate the epidemiology of leptospirosis in this island. In this study, we demonstrated that free-roaming stray cats in Okinawa Island were predominantly infected with L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica and shed the bacterium in urine, suggesting a potential role of cats in transmitting leptospirosis to humans.

The prevalence of anti- Leptospira antibodies and the detection of leptospiral DNA among cats worldwide range from 4 to 33% and 0% to 67.8%, respectively 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 . In this study, the seropositivity was 16.6%, and more than 90% of the cat serum samples reacted with serogroup Javanica (Table 1 ). Pathogenic Leptospira DNA was detected in three cat urine samples (7.1%, 3/42). The seropositivity in this study was slightly higher than that in previous studies done in Okinawa Prefecture (mainly in the Okinawa Island) 30 years ago (4.8% and 9.1%), but reactive serogroups were much diverse in the previous studies 27 , 28 . Previous studies reported that Leptospira spp. were isolated from 1.0% and 3.1% of the cats tested, lower than the DNA detection in this study, but success in isolation is generally lower than that in DNA detection. The positive rate of anti-leptospiral antibodies and leptospiral DNA detection in cats could be affected by various factors, such as age, rearing styles, season, geographical region, presence of maintenance hosts, panel of serovars, and/or cutoff value used for MAT, sensitivity, and specificity of the primer (and probe) set used for PCR 9 , 15 , 16 , 38 , which may be true for this study, and primer sets for other genes may be able to detect leptospiral DNA in more samples. This study employed reciprocal MAT titer 160 as the cutoff value because MAT titer 100 is generally accepted to indicate a previous infection 3 , 5 . Under this definition, there was no significant association between seropositivity and capture area in Okinawa Island. A previous report indicated that the prevalence of anti-leptospiral antibodies in cats was higher in rural areas than in urban areas 9 . The southern part of Okinawa Island is an urban area, and it changes to rural areas as it moves northward. In addition, human leptospirosis is often reported in the northern area due to recreational activities in rivers 37 . These facts suggest no regional difference in the risk of leptospiral infection in cats in Okinawa Island. The previous study mentioned above included only domestic cats 9 , whereas this study included free-roaming, stray cats. Stray cats have more risk of contact with maintenance hosts than pet cats, even in urban areas, resulting in discrepant results between the two studies. In addition, as more than 90% of seropositive cats had antibodies against serogroup Javanica, the transmission of L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica may easily occur between cats. A significant association between seropositivity and cat age groups based on weight was shown in this study ( p  = 0.021), and seropositivity tended to increase with age ( p  = 0.006). This is consistent with the previous report describing that older cats had higher seroprevalence due to an increased opportunity for exposure to the source of infection 16 .

Each serovar tends to be maintained in specific animal species: host-maintained infections of global importance are Icterohaemorrhagiae in the brown rat, Hardjo in cattle and sheep, Canicola in dogs, and Bratislava in pigs 5 . Infections with several serovars/serogroups have been identified in cats, such as Australis, Autumnalis, Ballum, Bataviae, Bratislava, Canicola, Copenhageni, Cynopteri, Grippotyphosa, Hardjo, Icterohaemorrhagiae, Javanica, Panama, Pomona, Pyrogenes, Rachmati, or Shermani 9 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 20 . A serological survey revealed that cats were predominantly infected with serogroup Javanica in Okinawa Island (Table 1 ). Serogroup Javanica has also been isolated from black rats and mongooses in the northern part of Okinawa Island 34 . MLST revealed that L. borgpetersenii detected in urine samples and isolated from cats, black rats, a mongoose, and humans all belonged to ST143. Although ST143 has been isolated from mongooses, L. interrogans serogroup Hebdomadis is the predominant strain isolated from mongooses 34 . Since cats are carnivorous and avoid water, they are more likely to be infected by rat predation than by waterborne infections 39 . These facts suggest an infection cycle between cats and rats in Okinawa Island. Monitoring acute leptospirosis in dogs as sentinels is suggested to aid in estimating the risk to humans in specific areas 40 . Cats may also act as sentinels, but their clinical manifestations seem to be less apparent than those of dogs 9 , 13 , 14 , 22 and their implications may need further verification.

Conversely, all urine PCR-positive cats showed high antibody titer against serogroup Javanica, indicating that they shed leptospires in urine for some period after infection. Therefore, infected stray cats contaminate the environment and can be a source for infection to humans. In this study, more than 90% of seropositive cats had antibodies against serogroup Javanica (Table 1 ), although a variety of Leptospira serogroups/serovars exist on the island 24 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 . In cases of leptospirosis in humans on this island during 2007–2016, Hebdomadis was the most frequently detected serogroup (40.1%, 57/142), whereas Javanica was rare (2.8%, 4/142) 37 . Urine PCR-positive DNA samples showed the presence of L. borgpetersenii ST143, which was the same ST with cat isolates on this island; furthermore, the serogroup of these isolates was Javanica (Table 2 ). It has been reported that naturally infected cats subclinically shed leptospires (leptospiral DNAs) for 8 months after infection 20 . These results suggest that this genotype of L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica can be easily transmitted among cats and that cats may act as their maintenance host. Antibodies against serogroup Javanica were also detected from cats in Taiwan 12 . Although no genetic information on serogroup Javanica strain from cats was obtained, the same L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica genotype has been isolated from rats in Taiwan and in other Asian countries, such as China, Indonesia, Laos, Thailand, and Sri Lanka 30 (PubMLST; https://pubmlst.org/organisms/leptospira-spp ). These facts suggest that cats may carry L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica in other Asian countries.

In addition to MLST, WGS revealed that L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica isolated from a cat, a mongoose, black rats, and humans in Okinawa Island belonged to the same cluster, supporting their genetic relatedness and the geographic structuring of genetic diversity of Leptospira species as with the previous studies 30 , 31 (Fig. 2 ). The previous report indicated that this genotype of L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica could infect various rodent species, suggesting that they are a generalist pathogen 30 . Moreover, this study supports this L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica as a generalist, as they can colonize the kidney tissues of cats and mongooses. In this study, only one cat and mongoose succeeded in WGS. WGS of more cat and mongoose isolates could identify animal species-specific characteristics, which may gain new insights into the mechanism of renal colonization and evolution of Leptospira spp. in different animals. It could also identify the precise animal source for human infection.

In conclusion, this study reports that cats are commonly infected with and excrete L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica that are genetically closely related to those isolated from black rats, mongooses, and humans in Okinawa Island, Japan. Although genetic relatedness suggests that black rats and mongooses are the source of infection for cats, a high proportion of serogroup Javanica infection and urinary excretion of L. borgpetersenii after infection also suggest that cats may be a maintenance host of L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica and the source for human infection.

Sample collection

There were 241 serum samples and 42 urine samples collected in Okinawa Island, the main island of Okinawa Prefecture, Japan. Of these, 121 serum samples and 42 urine samples were collected from free-roaming, stray cats captured/accommodated at the Okinawa Prefectural Animal Protection and Control Center from June 2012 to November 2018, based on the Act on Welfare and Management of Animals. Cats were euthanized by carbon dioxide gas inhalation under the Act, not for this study, and all methods were performed in accordance with the American Veterinary Medical Association guidelines. Autopsy findings, body weight, sex, and capture area were recorded. Blood was collected in a serum separation tube by cardiocentesis and centrifuged at 1710 ×  g for 15 min to separate the serum. Urine was aseptically collected directly from the bladder using a syringe. Blood and urine collection from euthanized cats was conducted with permission from the Okinawa Prefectural Animal Protection and Control Center.

The other 120 serum samples were derived from the residual blood collected from free-roaming, stray cats during the free-roaming neutering program in the northern part of Okinawa Island from 2016 to 2018 carried out by a nonprofit organization. Serum was separated as described above, and the body weight, sex, and capture area of cats were recorded.

The study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines ( https://arriveguidelines.org/ ).

Antibody detection from cats

To detect anti- Leptospira antibodies in serum samples, MAT was performed using 13 reference strains of serogroups: Australis (serovar Australis), Autumnalis (Autumnalis and Rachmati), Ballum (Castellonis), Bataviae (Bataviae), Canicola (Canicola), Grippotyphosa (Grippotyphosa), Hebdomadis (Hebdomadis), Icterohaemorrhagiae (Icterohaemorrhagiae), Javanica (Javanica), Pomona (Pomona), Pyrogenes (Pyrogenes), and Sejroe (Hardjo). These reference strains were cultivated in Ellinghausen-McCullough-Johnson-Harris medium at 30°C 7 . Twenty-five microliters of twofold serially diluted serum samples [1:80–1:5120 by phosphate-buffered saline] were incubated with the same volume of leptospiral cultures for 3 h at 30 °C. The endpoint was determined by ≥ 50% decrease of free, unagglutinated leptospires compared with the control suspension 3 . Reciprocal MAT titer 160 was used for the cutoff antibody titer.

DNA detection from cat urine samples

DNA was extracted from 200 µL urine using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and subjected to nested PCR targeting flaB for the pathogenic Leptospira spp. First, 5 µl of extracted DNA were used for the first PCR using the primer set L- flaB -F1 5′-CTCACCGTTCTCTAAAGTTCAAC-3′ and L- flaB -R1 5′-TGAATTCGGTTTCATATTTGCC-3′ in a 50 µl reaction volume. Then, 1 µl of the first PCR product was added to 19 µl of the second PCR mixture with the primer set L- flaB -F2 5′-TGTGGACAAGACGATGAAAGC-3′ and L- flaB -R2 5′-AACATTGCCGTACCACTCTG-3′. The positive first PCR samples (FU18017, FU18027, and FU18028) were subjected to DNA sequencing using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).

MLST was performed for the flaB -positive DNA samples (FU18017, FU18027, and FU18028) and DNA samples extracted from nine strains of Leptospira borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica isolated from cats, a mongoose, black rats, and humans using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit, which were stored at − 80 °C at the Okinawa Prefectural Institute of Health and Environment 27 , 28 (Table 2 ). MLST using seven housekeeping genes ( glmU , pntA , sucA , tpiA , pfkB , mreA , and caiB ) for the isolates was performed as previously described 40 . MLST for the flaB -positive DNAs, FU18017 and FU18028, was performed via nested PCR as previously described 42 . For FU18027, since five of the seven genes were not amplified using the original primer sets 41 , 42 , new primer sets were designed based on L. borgpetersenii sequences (accession numbers CP000350, CP012029, CP015044, CP015046, CP015048, CP015050, CP015052, CP015814, CP021412, CP026671, and CP033440) as described in Table 3 . glmU , sucA , tpiA , pfkB , and caiB were amplified by nested PCR while pntA and mreA were amplified by the first PCR alone. Nucleotide sequences of the amplicons were determined using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit. The concatenated sequences were aligned in MEGA10, and STs were assigned through the MLST database ( https://pubmlst.org/organisms/leptospira-spp ). A minimum spanning tree (MST) based on the allelic profiles determined in this study and those of 182 L. borgpetersenii strains registered in the MLST database was created using BioNumerics Software (version 7.6; Applied-Maths, Sint Maartens-Latem, Belgium) with default settings (MST for categorical data).

Genomic DNA from the six strains in Table 2 was prepared as described above. Genomic DNA libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT DNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and sequenced on MiSeq (Illumina) with 300 bp paired-end reads. Core genome single nucleotide variants (SNVs) were extracted using BactSNP v.1.1.037 43 with the genome of L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica serovar Ceylonica strain Piyasena as the reference (GenBank accession no. CP026671.1 and CP026672.1). For phylogenetic analysis, SNVs in the recombinogenic regions detected using Gubbins version 2.3.4 44 and those in the repetitive regions of the Piyasena genome identified using MUMmer v.3.2259 45 were excluded. Phylogenetic relationships were determined by reconstructing a phylogenetic tree via the maximum likelihood method using IQ-TREE 46 with 1000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates. The data have been deposited with links to BioProject accession number PRJDB10861 in the DDBJ BioProject database.

Statistical methods

To define the capture areas, the island was divided into northern, central, and southern areas. Cats were categorized according to three age groups based on weight as previously described 47 : male: kitten, < 1.0 kg; juvenile, 1–2.4 kg; and adult, ≥ 2.5 kg and female: kitten, < 1.0 kg; juvenile, 1–1.9 kg; and adult, ≥ 2.0 kg. Associations of seropositivity with capture area, sex, and age based on weight were analyzed using χ 2 test or 2 × 3 Fisher’s exact test and χ 2 test for trend.

Ethics declarations

No ethical approval was required as the samples were collected from cats sacrificed under an act or derived from residual blood from health examinations.

Data availability

The flaB sequences have been deposited in a public database (DDBJ accession numbers LC596932–LC596934). The WGS data have been deposited with links to BioProject accession number PRJDB10861 in the DDBJ BioProject database.

Cerqueira, G. M. & Picardeau, M. A century of Leptospira strain typing. Infect. Genet. Evol. 9 , 760–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2009.06.009 (2009).

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Guglielmini, J. et al. Genus-wide Leptospira core genome multilocus sequence typing for strain taxonomy and global surveillance. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 13 , e0007374. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007374 (2019).

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Levett, P. N. Leptospirosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 14 , 296–326. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.14.2.296-326.2001 (2001).

Vincent, A. T. et al. Revisiting the taxonomy and evolution of pathogenicity of the genus Leptospira through the prism of genomics. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 13 , e0007270. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007270 (2019).

Ellis, W. A. Animal leptospirosis. In Leptospira and Leptospirosis (ed. Adler, B.) 99–137 (Springer, Berlin, 2015).

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Haake, D. A. & Levett, P. N. Leptospirosis in humans. In Leptospira and Leptospirosis (ed. Adler, B.) 65–97 (Springer, Berlin, 2015).

Faine, S., Adler, B., Bolin, C. & Perolat, P. Leptospira and Leptospirosis 2nd edn. (MediSci, Amsterdam, 1999).

Google Scholar  

Alashraf, A. R. et al. First report of pathogenic Leptospira spp. isolated from urine and kidneys of naturally infected cats. PLoS ONE 15 , e0230048. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230048 (2020).

Azócar-Aedo, L., Monti, G. & Jara, R. Leptospira spp. in domestic cats from different environments: prevalence of antibodies and risk factors associated with the seropositivity. Animals 4 , 612–626. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani4040612 (2014).

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Dybing, N. A., Jacobson, C., Irwin, P., Algar, D. & Adams, P. J. Leptospira species in feral cats and black rats from Western Australia and Christmas Island. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 17 , 319–324. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2016.1992 (2017).

Gomard, Y. et al. Feral cats do not play a major role in leptospirosis epidemiology on Reunion Island. Epidemiol. Infect. 147 , e97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268819000190 (2019).

Chan, K.-W. et al. Serological and PCR detection of feline Leptospira in Southern Taiwan. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 14 , 118–123. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2013.1324 (2014).

Lapointe, C., Plamondon, I. & Dunn, M. Feline leptospirosis serosurvey from a Quebec referral hospital. Can. Vet. J. 54 , 497–499 (2013).

PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Millán, J. et al. Leptospirosis in wild and domestic carnivores in natural areas in Andalusia, Spain. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 9 , 549–554. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2008.0081 (2009).

Murillo, A. et al. Leptospira detection in cats in Spain by serology and molecular techniques. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17 , 1600. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051600 (2020).

Article   CAS   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Mylonakis, M. E. et al. Leptospiral seroepidemiology in a feline hospital population in Greece. Vet. Rec. 156 , 615–616. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.156.19.615 (2005).

Ojeda, J., Salgado, M., Encina, C., Santamaria, C. & Monti, G. Evidence of interspecies transmission of pathogenic Leptospira between livestock and a domestic cat dwelling in a dairy cattle farm. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 80 , 1305–1308. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.16-0361 (2018).

Pratt, N., Conan, A. & Rajeev, S. Leptospira seroprevalence in domestic dogs and cats on the Caribbean Island of Saint Kitts. Vet. Med. Int. 2017 , 5904757. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5904757 (2017).

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Talebkhan Garoussi, M., Mehravaran, M., Abdollahpour, G. & Khoshnegah, J. Seroprevalence of leptospiral infection in feline population in urban and dairy cattle herds in Mashhad, Iran. Vet. Res. Forum 6 , 301–304 (2015).

Weis, S. et al. Detection of Leptospira DNA in urine and presence of specific antibodies in outdoor cats in Germany. J. Feline Med. Surg. 19 , 470–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X16634389 (2017).

Zaidi, S. et al. Urinary shedding of pathogenic Leptospira in stray dogs and cats, Algiers: a prospective study. PLoS ONE 13 , 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197068 (2018).

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Murillo, A., Goris, M., Ahmed, A., Cuenca, R. & Pastor, J. Leptospirosis in cats: Current literature review to guide diagnosis and management. J. Feline Med. Surg. 22 , 216–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X20903601 (2020).

Japan Pet Food Association. The dog and cat breeding fact-finding survey in Japan. Retrieved from https://petfood.or.jp/data/chart2019/index.html (2019).

Koizumi, N. et al. Molecular and serological investigation of Leptospira and leptospirosis in dogs in Japan. J. Med. Microbiol. 62 , 630–636. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.050039-0 (2013).

Koizumi, N., Muto, M. M., Izumiya, H., Suzuki, M. & Ohnishi, M. Multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis and clinical characterization of Leptospira interrogans canine isolates. J. Med. Microbiol. 64 , 288–294. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.000027 (2015).

Akuzawa, M., Maruyama, T., Endo, Y., Oishi, A. & Nakamura, K. Survey of Leptospira antibodies in domestic cats in the southern Kyushu district. J. Jpn. Vet. Med. Assoc. 59 , 45–48. https://doi.org/10.12935/jvma1951.59.45 (2006).

Article   Google Scholar  

Yonahara, Y., Tokumura, K., Shingaki, Y., Kinjo, E. & Chiba, Y. Investigation on the prevalence of leptospirosis among cats in Okinawa Islands. Ann. Rep. Okinawa Pref. Inst. Public Health 24 , 40–45 (1990) ( in Japanese ).

Yonahara, Y. et al. Investigation on the prevalence of leptospirosis among cats in Okinawa (Continuation). Ann. Rep. Okinawa Pref. Inst. Public Health 25 , 33–40 (1991) ( in Japanese ).

Dietrich, M. et al. Biogeography of Leptospira in wild animal communities inhabiting the insular ecosystem of the western Indian Ocean islands and neighboring Africa. Emergy. Microbes Infect. 7 , 57. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41426-018-0059-4 (2018).

Koizumi, N., Wada, T., Morita, M., Mu, J.-J. & Ohnishi, M. Comparative genomic analysis of Leptospira borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica isolated from Rattus species in Southern Japan, Philippines, and Taiwan. Infect. Gen. Evol. 85 , 104447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104447 (2020).

Santos, L. A. et al. Genomic comparison among global isolates of L. interrogans serovars Copenhageni and Icterohaemorrhagiae identified natural genetic variation caused by an indel. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 8 , 193. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2018.00193 (2018).

Zhang, C. et al. Genetic characteristics of pathogenic Leptospira in wild small animals and livestock in Jiangxi Province, China, 2002–2015. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 13 , e0007513. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007513 (2019).

Ghneim, G. S. et al. Use of a case-control study and geographic information systems to determine environmental and demographic risk factors for canine leptospirosis. Vet. Res. 38 , 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1051/vetres:2006043 (2007).

Ishibashi, O. et al. Distribution of Leptospira spp. on the small Asian mongoose and the roof rat inhabiting the northern part of Okinawa Island. Jpn. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 11 , 35–41. https://doi.org/10.5686/jjzwm.11.35 (2006).

Koizumi, N. et al. Multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis of Leptospira interrogans and Leptospira borgpetersenii isolated from small feral and wild mammals in East Asia. Infect. Gen. Evol. 36 , 434–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2015.08.013 (2015).

Nakamura, M. et al. A survey of leptospiral reservoir animals in Okinawa Prefecture. J. Jpn. Vet. Med. Assoc. 57 , 321–325. https://doi.org/10.12935/jvma1951.57.321 (2004).

National Institute of Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis and Infectious Diseases Control Division, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Leptospirosis in Japan, January 2007–April 2016. Infect. Agents Surveill. Rep. 37 , 103–104. https://www0.niid.go.jp/niid/idsc/iasr/37/436.pdf . (2016).

Rodriguez, J., Lapointe, C., Arsenault, J., Carioto, L. & Harel, J. Serologic and urinary PCR survey of leptospirosis in healthy cats and in cats with kidney disease. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 28 , 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.12287 (2014).

Hartmann, K. et al. Leptospira species infection in cats: ABCD guidelines on prevention and management. J. Feline Med. Surg. 15 , 576–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X13489217 (2013).

Article   ADS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Martins, G., Penna, B. & Lilenbaum, W. The dog in the transmission of human leptospirosis under tropical conditions: victim or villain?. Epidemiol. Infect. 140 , 207–208. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268811000276 (2012).

Boonsilp, S. et al. A single multilocus sequence typing (MLST) scheme for seven pathogenic Leptospira species. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 7 , e1954. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001954 (2013).

Weiss, S. et al. An extended multilocus sequence typing (MLST) scheme for rapid direct typing of Leptospira from clinical samples. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 10 , 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004996 (2016).

Yoshimura, D. et al. Evaluation of SNP calling methods for closely related bacterial isolates and a novel high-accuracy pipeline: BactSNP. Microb. Genom. 5 , 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.000261 (2019).

Croucher, N. J. et al. Rapid phylogenetic analysis of large samples of recombinant bacterial whole genome sequences using Gubbins. Nucleic Acids Res. 43 , e15. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku1196 (2015).

Kurtz, S. et al. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol. 5 , 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12 (2004).

Nguyen, L. T., Schmidt, H. A., Von Haeseler, A. & Minh, B. Q. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32 , 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu300 (2015).

Algar, D., Hamilton, N. & Pink, C. Progress in eradicating cats ( Felis catus ) on Christmas Island to conserve biodiversity. Raffles Bull. Zool. Suppl. 30 , 45–53 (2014).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Okinawa Prefectural Animal Protection and Control Center and Okinawa Wildlife Federation for collecting the samples. We are grateful to Kanako Oba for her technical assistance. This work was supported by the Research Program on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases (JP21fk0108139) from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) (N.K.).

Author information

Present address: Regional Health Division, Department of Public Health and Medical Care, Okinawa Prefectural Government, 1-2-2 Izumizaki, Naha-shi, Okinawa, 900-8570, Japan

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Biological Sciences, Okinawa Prefectural Institute of Health and Environment, 17-1 Kanekadan, Uruma-shi, Okinawa, 904-2241, Japan

Tetsuya Kakita, Yumani Kuba, Hisako Kyan & Sho Okano

Department of Bacteriology I, National Institute of Infectious Disease, 1-23-1 Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8640, Japan

Masatomo Morita & Nobuo Koizumi

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

T.K. and N.K. conceived and designed the study. T.K., Y.K., S.O., M.M., and N.K. conducted the experiments. T.K., M.M., and N.K. analyzed the data. H.K. supervised the study. T.K., M.M., and N.K. wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tetsuya Kakita .

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary information., rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Kakita, T., Kuba, Y., Kyan, H. et al. Molecular and serological epidemiology of Leptospira infection in cats in Okinawa Island, Japan. Sci Rep 11 , 10365 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89872-3

Download citation

Received : 27 December 2020

Accepted : 26 April 2021

Published : 14 May 2021

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89872-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

Vector-borne and other pathogens of potential relevance disseminated by relocated cats.

  • Ricardo Guillermo Maggi
  • Vicky Halls

Parasites & Vectors (2022)

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines . If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

leptospirosis in cats current literature review to guide diagnosis and management

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Publications
  • Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

  • Advanced Search
  • Journal List
  • Scientific Reports

Logo of scirep

Molecular and serological epidemiology of Leptospira infection in cats in Okinawa Island, Japan

Tetsuya kakita.

1 Department of Biological Sciences, Okinawa Prefectural Institute of Health and Environment, 17-1 Kanekadan, Uruma-shi, Okinawa, 904-2241 Japan

Yumani Kuba

Hisako kyan.

3 Present Address: Regional Health Division, Department of Public Health and Medical Care, Okinawa Prefectural Government, 1-2-2 Izumizaki, Naha-shi, Okinawa, 900-8570 Japan

Masatomo Morita

2 Department of Bacteriology I, National Institute of Infectious Disease, 1-23-1 Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8640 Japan

Nobuo Koizumi

Associated data.

The flaB sequences have been deposited in a public database (DDBJ accession numbers {"type":"entrez-nucleotide-range","attrs":{"text":"LC596932-LC596934","start_term":"LC596932","end_term":"LC596934","start_term_id":"1941613809","end_term_id":"1941613820"}} LC596932-LC596934 ). The WGS data have been deposited with links to BioProject accession number PRJDB10861 in the DDBJ BioProject database.

Leptospirosis is a zoonosis caused by pathogenic Leptospira spp. Cats have been reported to be infected with Leptospira spp. and shed the bacteria in the urine. However, the importance of cats as an infection source for humans remains unclear. In this study, Leptospira infection in cats in Okinawa Prefecture, Japan, where leptospirosis is endemic, was investigated by leptospiral antibody and DNA detection using microscopic agglutination test and nested PCR, respectively. Moreover, multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) were conducted on the Leptospira borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica isolated from cats, black rats, a mongoose, and humans. Anti- Leptospira antibodies were detected in 16.6% (40/241) of the cats tested, and the predominant reactive serogroup was Javanica. The leptospiral flaB gene was detected in 7.1% (3/42) of cat urine samples, and their sequences were identical and identified as L. borgpetersenii . MLST and WGS revealed the genetic relatedness of L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica isolates. This study indicated that most seropositive cats had antibodies against the serogroup Javanica and that cats excreted L. borgpetersenii in the urine after infection. Further, genetic relatedness between cat and human isolates suggests that cats may be a maintenance host for L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica and a source for human infection.

Introduction

Leptospirosis is a zoonotic disease caused by infection with pathogenic spirochetes of the genus Leptospira , composed of 64 species divided into 24 serogroups and more than 300 serovars 1 – 4 . Leptospira spp. colonize the proximal renal tubules of maintenance hosts, including wild animals such as rats and boars, livestock such as cattle and pigs, and companion animals such as dogs, and are shed in their urine 2 , 5 , 6 . Humans are infected percutaneously or permucosally with Leptospira spp. by direct contact with the urine of maintenance hosts or by indirect contact with soil or water contaminated with infected urine 3 , 6 , 7 .

Cats have not been considered an important source of Leptospira infection for humans. Besides antibody detection, however, several recent studies from various regions reported that Leptospira spp. were isolated or leptospiral DNAs were detected from cat urine or kidney samples 8 – 21 ; carriage rate was related to some factors such as rearing style (cat external behavior), climate, and living environment (urban or rural) 15 , 20 . Moreover, leptospiral DNA was continuously detected in the urine of naturally infected cats for 8 months 20 . Although symptomatic cases with polyuria, polydipsia, hematuria, ascites, and diarrhea have been reported, the clinical presentation of leptospirosis in cats is rare, usually mild, or subclinical, and symptoms in feline leptospirosis remain undefined 9 , 13 , 14 , 17 , 20 , 22 . These studies suggest that cats can carry and shed pathogenic Leptospira in urine for a long period after infection. Asymptomatic or uncertain symptoms of infected cats make the diagnosis and appropriate treatment difficult and prevent infected cats from becoming a chronic carrier, resulting in a potential infection source for humans.

Cats are the most common companion animal in Japan. According to a survey conducted by the Japan Pet Food Association, the number of cats has been increasing year by year, and the number of cats raised in Japan is estimated to be 9,778,000 in 2019, higher than that of dogs 23 . Canine leptospirosis and its causative Leptospira spp. have been recently reported 24 , 25 , but the current status of Leptospira infection in cats in Japan remains limited. In the southern Kyushu District, the prevalence of anti- Leptospira antibodies in domestic cats was reported to be 7.7% 26 . In Okinawa Prefecture, the southernmost part of Japan, where leptospirosis is endemic, it was reported 30 years ago that the seroprevalence and isolation rate of Leptospira spp. among cats ranged from 4.8 to 9.1% and 1.0% to 3.1%, respectively 27 , 28 . Although Leptospira spp. were isolated, molecular characterization of the isolates was not performed in these studies.

Understanding the Leptospira genotype-host association in maintenance hosts is important for elucidating and controlling the source for human infection. Currently, molecular typing methods, such as multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and multilocus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA), are the main methods for characterizing Leptospira isolates 1 . As a genotyping method having higher resolution, whole genome sequencing (WGS) has been rapidly developed in recent years. These methods have enabled the understanding of host specificity of certain Leptospira genotypes as well as the geographic structuring of genetic diversity and host switching event in Leptospira spp 29 – 32 .

In this study, to clarify Leptospira infection and carriage in cats in Okinawa Island (Okinawa Main Island), anti-leptospiral antibodies in cats were investigated by the microscopic agglutination test (MAT) using 13 reference strains. Leptospiral DNA was detected from cat urine samples by nested PCR. Moreover, MLST and WGS were performed to gain further insights into the genetic relatedness of Leptospira isolates from cats, mongooses, rats, and humans.

Antibodies against Leptospira spp. were detected in 40 of 241 cats (16.6%) included in the analysis. Thirty-seven cats and one cat had antibodies against serogroups Javanica and Hebdomadis, respectively, and two samples were positive for multiple serogroups (Table ​ (Table1). 1 ). The reciprocal antibody titers for serogroup Javanica ranged from 160 to 2560 (Table ​ (Table1). 1 ). The antibody-positive samples in the northern, central, and southern regions of Okinawa Island were 15.0% (26/173), 22.0% (9/41), and 18.5% (5/27), respectively. Of the 40 anti-leptospiral antibody-positive cats, 23 were male (19.3%) and 17 were female (13.9%). There were no significant differences between seropositivity and capture area nor between seropositivity and sex. In contrast, the seropositivity varied among the age groups based on weight: 3% (1/33) in kittens, 12.1% (7/58) in juveniles, and 21.3% (32/150) in adults. There was a statistically significant difference in the seropositivity among the age groups ( p  = 0.021), and a trend toward an increase in seropositivity with age was observed ( p  = 0.006).

Frequency of anti- Leptospira antibodies in cats.

† The cat FS13001 exhibited the reciprocal MAT titer 160 and 640 for serogroups Ballum and Javanica, respectively.

‡ The cat FS18013 exhibited the reciprocal MAT titer 160 and 1280 for serogroups Autumnalis and Hebdomadis, respectively.

MAT, microscopic agglutination test.

Leptospiral flaB was detected in 3 of 42 urine samples (7.1%, see Supplementary Fig. S1 online) included in the analysis. All three PCR-positive cats were also positive for antibody against serogroup Javanica with the titers of 320 (2 animals) and 640 (1 animal). All three flaB sequences were identical and identified as L. borgpetersenii (DDBJ accession numbers {"type":"entrez-nucleotide-range","attrs":{"text":"LC596932-LC596934","start_term":"LC596932","end_term":"LC596934","start_term_id":"1941613809","end_term_id":"1941613820"}} LC596932-LC596934 ). Amplification of all seven housekeeping genes for MLST was succeeded in two of the three flaB -positive urine samples (FU18017 and FU18027) and nine strains of L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica (Table ​ (Table2). 2 ). Their sequence types (STs) were all assigned as ST143 (Fig. ​ (Fig.1). 1 ). There were no gross abnormalities in the autopsy findings in the three cats.

L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica strains used for MLST and/or WGS.

MLST, multilocus sequence typing; WGS, whole genome sequencing.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 41598_2021_89872_Fig1_HTML.jpg

MST of L. borgpetersenii detected from cat urine samples and L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica strains in this study and 182 L. borgpetersenii strains based on the allelic profiles of the MLST seven housekeeping genes. Each circle represents an individual ST, and the numbers represent ST numbers. Circle sizes correspond to the numbers of strains in each ST. The thickness and the dotting of lines indicate the distance between the circles: a thicker line indicates a closer distance than a thin line, and a thin line denotes a closer distance than a dotted line. The green-colored circle and the ST number in red represent L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica strains and DNAs determined in this study.

Of the six strains subjected to WGS, enough data for comparison were obtained from four strains, OHJ2008-88U, FK-118, 058031, and 078065. Strains isolated from a cat, a mongoose, and humans were clustered with L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica strains isolated from black rats in Okinawa Island sequenced in a previous study 30 (Fig. ​ (Fig.2 2 ).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 41598_2021_89872_Fig2_HTML.jpg

Core genome SNP-based maximum likelihood tree of L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica strains isolated in Japan. The strain Piyasena, belonging to serogroup Javanica serovar Ceylonica, was used as the reference, omitted from the tree. WGS of strains 058031, 078065, FK-118, and OHJ2008-88U was performed in this study, and strains named WFA have been analyzed in a previous study 30 . Black, human isolate; blue, black rat isolate; green, mongoose isolate; red, cat isolate.

Identification of prevalent serovar(s) and their maintenance host(s) and seroprevalence in the host(s) is important for understanding the epidemiology of leptospirosis in a particular geographic region 33 . In the Okinawa Island, which has a subtropical climate, Leptospira spp. have been isolated or detected from various animals such as rat, mouse, shrew, mongoose, wild boar, and dog 24 , 34 – 36 . The animals excrete the bacteria into the environment where Leptospira spp. can survive and remain infective for several weeks 7 . Humans can get infected with Leptospira spp. through contact with the contaminated environment during recreational activities in rivers and agricultural activities 37 . Therefore, the approach of “One Health” recognizing the interconnection between humans, animals, and their shared environment is important to elucidate the epidemiology of leptospirosis in this island. In this study, we demonstrated that free-roaming stray cats in Okinawa Island were predominantly infected with L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica and shed the bacterium in urine, suggesting a potential role of cats in transmitting leptospirosis to humans.

The prevalence of anti- Leptospira antibodies and the detection of leptospiral DNA among cats worldwide range from 4 to 33% and 0% to 67.8%, respectively 9 – 16 , 18 – 21 . In this study, the seropositivity was 16.6%, and more than 90% of the cat serum samples reacted with serogroup Javanica (Table ​ (Table1). 1 ). Pathogenic Leptospira DNA was detected in three cat urine samples (7.1%, 3/42). The seropositivity in this study was slightly higher than that in previous studies done in Okinawa Prefecture (mainly in the Okinawa Island) 30 years ago (4.8% and 9.1%), but reactive serogroups were much diverse in the previous studies 27 , 28 . Previous studies reported that Leptospira spp. were isolated from 1.0% and 3.1% of the cats tested, lower than the DNA detection in this study, but success in isolation is generally lower than that in DNA detection. The positive rate of anti-leptospiral antibodies and leptospiral DNA detection in cats could be affected by various factors, such as age, rearing styles, season, geographical region, presence of maintenance hosts, panel of serovars, and/or cutoff value used for MAT, sensitivity, and specificity of the primer (and probe) set used for PCR 9 , 15 , 16 , 38 , which may be true for this study, and primer sets for other genes may be able to detect leptospiral DNA in more samples. This study employed reciprocal MAT titer 160 as the cutoff value because MAT titer 100 is generally accepted to indicate a previous infection 3 , 5 . Under this definition, there was no significant association between seropositivity and capture area in Okinawa Island. A previous report indicated that the prevalence of anti-leptospiral antibodies in cats was higher in rural areas than in urban areas 9 . The southern part of Okinawa Island is an urban area, and it changes to rural areas as it moves northward. In addition, human leptospirosis is often reported in the northern area due to recreational activities in rivers 37 . These facts suggest no regional difference in the risk of leptospiral infection in cats in Okinawa Island. The previous study mentioned above included only domestic cats 9 , whereas this study included free-roaming, stray cats. Stray cats have more risk of contact with maintenance hosts than pet cats, even in urban areas, resulting in discrepant results between the two studies. In addition, as more than 90% of seropositive cats had antibodies against serogroup Javanica, the transmission of L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica may easily occur between cats. A significant association between seropositivity and cat age groups based on weight was shown in this study ( p  = 0.021), and seropositivity tended to increase with age ( p  = 0.006). This is consistent with the previous report describing that older cats had higher seroprevalence due to an increased opportunity for exposure to the source of infection 16 .

Each serovar tends to be maintained in specific animal species: host-maintained infections of global importance are Icterohaemorrhagiae in the brown rat, Hardjo in cattle and sheep, Canicola in dogs, and Bratislava in pigs 5 . Infections with several serovars/serogroups have been identified in cats, such as Australis, Autumnalis, Ballum, Bataviae, Bratislava, Canicola, Copenhageni, Cynopteri, Grippotyphosa, Hardjo, Icterohaemorrhagiae, Javanica, Panama, Pomona, Pyrogenes, Rachmati, or Shermani 9 , 12 , 14 – 16 , 18 – 20 . A serological survey revealed that cats were predominantly infected with serogroup Javanica in Okinawa Island (Table ​ (Table1). 1 ). Serogroup Javanica has also been isolated from black rats and mongooses in the northern part of Okinawa Island 34 . MLST revealed that L. borgpetersenii detected in urine samples and isolated from cats, black rats, a mongoose, and humans all belonged to ST143. Although ST143 has been isolated from mongooses, L. interrogans serogroup Hebdomadis is the predominant strain isolated from mongooses 34 . Since cats are carnivorous and avoid water, they are more likely to be infected by rat predation than by waterborne infections 39 . These facts suggest an infection cycle between cats and rats in Okinawa Island. Monitoring acute leptospirosis in dogs as sentinels is suggested to aid in estimating the risk to humans in specific areas 40 . Cats may also act as sentinels, but their clinical manifestations seem to be less apparent than those of dogs 9 , 13 , 14 , 22 and their implications may need further verification.

Conversely, all urine PCR-positive cats showed high antibody titer against serogroup Javanica, indicating that they shed leptospires in urine for some period after infection. Therefore, infected stray cats contaminate the environment and can be a source for infection to humans. In this study, more than 90% of seropositive cats had antibodies against serogroup Javanica (Table ​ (Table1), 1 ), although a variety of Leptospira serogroups/serovars exist on the island 24 , 34 – 37 . In cases of leptospirosis in humans on this island during 2007–2016, Hebdomadis was the most frequently detected serogroup (40.1%, 57/142), whereas Javanica was rare (2.8%, 4/142) 37 . Urine PCR-positive DNA samples showed the presence of L. borgpetersenii ST143, which was the same ST with cat isolates on this island; furthermore, the serogroup of these isolates was Javanica (Table ​ (Table2). 2 ). It has been reported that naturally infected cats subclinically shed leptospires (leptospiral DNAs) for 8 months after infection 20 . These results suggest that this genotype of L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica can be easily transmitted among cats and that cats may act as their maintenance host. Antibodies against serogroup Javanica were also detected from cats in Taiwan 12 . Although no genetic information on serogroup Javanica strain from cats was obtained, the same L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica genotype has been isolated from rats in Taiwan and in other Asian countries, such as China, Indonesia, Laos, Thailand, and Sri Lanka 30 (PubMLST; https://pubmlst.org/organisms/leptospira-spp ). These facts suggest that cats may carry L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica in other Asian countries.

In addition to MLST, WGS revealed that L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica isolated from a cat, a mongoose, black rats, and humans in Okinawa Island belonged to the same cluster, supporting their genetic relatedness and the geographic structuring of genetic diversity of Leptospira species as with the previous studies 30 , 31 (Fig. ​ (Fig.2). 2 ). The previous report indicated that this genotype of L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica could infect various rodent species, suggesting that they are a generalist pathogen 30 . Moreover, this study supports this L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica as a generalist, as they can colonize the kidney tissues of cats and mongooses. In this study, only one cat and mongoose succeeded in WGS. WGS of more cat and mongoose isolates could identify animal species-specific characteristics, which may gain new insights into the mechanism of renal colonization and evolution of Leptospira spp. in different animals. It could also identify the precise animal source for human infection.

In conclusion, this study reports that cats are commonly infected with and excrete L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica that are genetically closely related to those isolated from black rats, mongooses, and humans in Okinawa Island, Japan. Although genetic relatedness suggests that black rats and mongooses are the source of infection for cats, a high proportion of serogroup Javanica infection and urinary excretion of L. borgpetersenii after infection also suggest that cats may be a maintenance host of L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica and the source for human infection.

Sample collection

There were 241 serum samples and 42 urine samples collected in Okinawa Island, the main island of Okinawa Prefecture, Japan. Of these, 121 serum samples and 42 urine samples were collected from free-roaming, stray cats captured/accommodated at the Okinawa Prefectural Animal Protection and Control Center from June 2012 to November 2018, based on the Act on Welfare and Management of Animals. Cats were euthanized by carbon dioxide gas inhalation under the Act, not for this study, and all methods were performed in accordance with the American Veterinary Medical Association guidelines. Autopsy findings, body weight, sex, and capture area were recorded. Blood was collected in a serum separation tube by cardiocentesis and centrifuged at 1710 ×  g for 15 min to separate the serum. Urine was aseptically collected directly from the bladder using a syringe. Blood and urine collection from euthanized cats was conducted with permission from the Okinawa Prefectural Animal Protection and Control Center.

The other 120 serum samples were derived from the residual blood collected from free-roaming, stray cats during the free-roaming neutering program in the northern part of Okinawa Island from 2016 to 2018 carried out by a nonprofit organization. Serum was separated as described above, and the body weight, sex, and capture area of cats were recorded.

The study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines ( https://arriveguidelines.org/ ).

Antibody detection from cats

To detect anti- Leptospira antibodies in serum samples, MAT was performed using 13 reference strains of serogroups: Australis (serovar Australis), Autumnalis (Autumnalis and Rachmati), Ballum (Castellonis), Bataviae (Bataviae), Canicola (Canicola), Grippotyphosa (Grippotyphosa), Hebdomadis (Hebdomadis), Icterohaemorrhagiae (Icterohaemorrhagiae), Javanica (Javanica), Pomona (Pomona), Pyrogenes (Pyrogenes), and Sejroe (Hardjo). These reference strains were cultivated in Ellinghausen-McCullough-Johnson-Harris medium at 30°C 7 . Twenty-five microliters of twofold serially diluted serum samples [1:80–1:5120 by phosphate-buffered saline] were incubated with the same volume of leptospiral cultures for 3 h at 30 °C. The endpoint was determined by ≥ 50% decrease of free, unagglutinated leptospires compared with the control suspension 3 . Reciprocal MAT titer 160 was used for the cutoff antibody titer.

DNA detection from cat urine samples

DNA was extracted from 200 µL urine using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and subjected to nested PCR targeting flaB for the pathogenic Leptospira spp. First, 5 µl of extracted DNA were used for the first PCR using the primer set L- flaB -F1 5′-CTCACCGTTCTCTAAAGTTCAAC-3′ and L- flaB -R1 5′-TGAATTCGGTTTCATATTTGCC-3′ in a 50 µl reaction volume. Then, 1 µl of the first PCR product was added to 19 µl of the second PCR mixture with the primer set L- flaB -F2 5′-TGTGGACAAGACGATGAAAGC-3′ and L- flaB -R2 5′-AACATTGCCGTACCACTCTG-3′. The positive first PCR samples (FU18017, FU18027, and FU18028) were subjected to DNA sequencing using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).

MLST was performed for the flaB -positive DNA samples (FU18017, FU18027, and FU18028) and DNA samples extracted from nine strains of Leptospira borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica isolated from cats, a mongoose, black rats, and humans using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit, which were stored at − 80 °C at the Okinawa Prefectural Institute of Health and Environment 27 , 28 (Table ​ (Table2). 2 ). MLST using seven housekeeping genes ( glmU , pntA , sucA , tpiA , pfkB , mreA , and caiB ) for the isolates was performed as previously described 40 . MLST for the flaB -positive DNAs, FU18017 and FU18028, was performed via nested PCR as previously described 42 . For FU18027, since five of the seven genes were not amplified using the original primer sets 41 , 42 , new primer sets were designed based on L. borgpetersenii sequences (accession numbers {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"CP000350","term_id":"116123488","term_text":"CP000350"}} CP000350 , {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"CP012029","term_id":"952988167","term_text":"CP012029"}} CP012029 , {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"CP015044","term_id":"1016614276","term_text":"CP015044"}} CP015044 , {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"CP015046","term_id":"1016618059","term_text":"CP015046"}} CP015046 , {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"CP015048","term_id":"1016621749","term_text":"CP015048"}} CP015048 , {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"CP015050","term_id":"1016626700","term_text":"CP015050"}} CP015050 , {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"CP015052","term_id":"1016631450","term_text":"CP015052"}} CP015052 , {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"CP015814","term_id":"1137166747","term_text":"CP015814"}} CP015814 , {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"CP021412","term_id":"1406170075","term_text":"CP021412"}} CP021412 , {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"CP026671","term_id":"1474584451","term_text":"CP026671"}} CP026671 , and {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"CP033440","term_id":"1510252799","term_text":"CP033440"}} CP033440 ) as described in Table ​ Table3. 3 . glmU , sucA , tpiA , pfkB , and caiB were amplified by nested PCR while pntA and mreA were amplified by the first PCR alone. Nucleotide sequences of the amplicons were determined using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit. The concatenated sequences were aligned in MEGA10, and STs were assigned through the MLST database ( https://pubmlst.org/organisms/leptospira-spp ). A minimum spanning tree (MST) based on the allelic profiles determined in this study and those of 182 L. borgpetersenii strains registered in the MLST database was created using BioNumerics Software (version 7.6; Applied-Maths, Sint Maartens-Latem, Belgium) with default settings (MST for categorical data).

MLST primer sets for Leptospira borgpetersenii clone FU18027.

MLST, multilocus sequence typing.

Genomic DNA from the six strains in Table ​ Table2 2 was prepared as described above. Genomic DNA libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT DNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and sequenced on MiSeq (Illumina) with 300 bp paired-end reads. Core genome single nucleotide variants (SNVs) were extracted using BactSNP v.1.1.037 43 with the genome of L. borgpetersenii serogroup Javanica serovar Ceylonica strain Piyasena as the reference (GenBank accession no. {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"CP026671.1","term_id":"1474584451","term_text":"CP026671.1"}} CP026671.1 and {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"CP026672.1","term_id":"1474587634","term_text":"CP026672.1"}} CP026672.1 ). For phylogenetic analysis, SNVs in the recombinogenic regions detected using Gubbins version 2.3.4 44 and those in the repetitive regions of the Piyasena genome identified using MUMmer v.3.2259 45 were excluded. Phylogenetic relationships were determined by reconstructing a phylogenetic tree via the maximum likelihood method using IQ-TREE 46 with 1000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates. The data have been deposited with links to BioProject accession number PRJDB10861 in the DDBJ BioProject database.

Statistical methods

To define the capture areas, the island was divided into northern, central, and southern areas. Cats were categorized according to three age groups based on weight as previously described 47 : male: kitten, < 1.0 kg; juvenile, 1–2.4 kg; and adult, ≥ 2.5 kg and female: kitten, < 1.0 kg; juvenile, 1–1.9 kg; and adult, ≥ 2.0 kg. Associations of seropositivity with capture area, sex, and age based on weight were analyzed using χ 2 test or 2 × 3 Fisher’s exact test and χ 2 test for trend.

Ethics declarations

No ethical approval was required as the samples were collected from cats sacrificed under an act or derived from residual blood from health examinations.

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements.

We thank Okinawa Prefectural Animal Protection and Control Center and Okinawa Wildlife Federation for collecting the samples. We are grateful to Kanako Oba for her technical assistance. This work was supported by the Research Program on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases (JP21fk0108139) from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) (N.K.).

Author contributions

T.K. and N.K. conceived and designed the study. T.K., Y.K., S.O., M.M., and N.K. conducted the experiments. T.K., M.M., and N.K. analyzed the data. H.K. supervised the study. T.K., M.M., and N.K. wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data availability

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-89872-3.

Europe PMC requires Javascript to function effectively.

Either your web browser doesn't support Javascript or it is currently turned off. In the latter case, please turn on Javascript support in your web browser and reload this page.

Search life-sciences literature (44,074,510 articles, preprints and more)

  • Full text links
  • Citations & impact
  • Similar Articles

Leptospirosis in cats: Current literature review to guide diagnosis and management.

Author information, affiliations.

  • Murillo A 1

ORCIDs linked to this article

  • Murillo Picco A | 0000-0002-7630-6116
  • Pastor J | 0000-0003-1702-9531

Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery , 01 Mar 2020 , 22(3): 216-228 https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612x20903601   PMID: 32093581 

Abstract 

Global importance, practical relevance, clinical challenges, evidence base, full text links .

Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612x20903601

Citations & impact 

Impact metrics, citations of article over time, alternative metrics.

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/76705226

Smart citations by scite.ai Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by EuropePMC if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles. Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been supported or disputed. https://scite.ai/reports/10.1177/1098612x20903601

Article citations, seroprevalence of pathogenic leptospira serogroups in asymptomatic domestic dogs and cats: systematic review and meta-analysis..

Ricardo T , Azócar-Aedo LI , Previtali MA , Monti G

Front Vet Sci , 11:1301959, 16 Feb 2024

Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 38435371 | PMCID: PMC10904519

Updated ACVIM consensus statement on leptospirosis in dogs.

Sykes JE , Francey T , Schuller S , Stoddard RA , Cowgill LD , Moore GE

J Vet Intern Med , 37(6):1966-1982, 20 Oct 2023

Cited by: 4 articles | PMID: 37861061 | PMCID: PMC10658540

Acute phase proteins and total antioxidant capacity in free-roaming cats infected by pathogenic leptospires.

Murillo A , Pastor J , Serrano E , Tvarijonaviciute A , Cerón J , Goris M , Ahmed A , Cuenca R

BMC Vet Res , 19(1):148, 07 Sep 2023

Cited by: 2 articles | PMID: 37679743 | PMCID: PMC10483874

Feline Susceptibility to Leptospirosis and Presence of Immunosuppressive Co-Morbidities: First European Report of L. interrogans Serogroup Australis Sequence Type 24 in a Cat and Survey of Leptospira Exposure in Outdoor Cats.

Mazzotta E , De Zan G , Cocchi M , Boniotti MB , Bertasio C , Furlanello T , Lucchese L , Ceglie L , Bellinati L , Natale A

Trop Med Infect Dis , 8(1):54, 10 Jan 2023

Cited by: 2 articles | PMID: 36668961 | PMCID: PMC9865706

Basic Aspects and Epidemiological Studies on Leptospirosis Carried Out in Animals in Chile: A Bibliographic Review.

Azócar-Aedo L

Trop Med Infect Dis , 8(2):97, 01 Feb 2023

Cited by: 4 articles | PMID: 36828513 | PMCID: PMC9964289

Similar Articles 

To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.

[Leptospira infections in cats].

Weis S , Hartmann K

Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere , 45(2):103-108, 22 Mar 2017

Cited by: 1 article | PMID: 28327780

Leptospira species infection in cats: ABCD guidelines on prevention and management.

Hartmann K , Egberink H , Pennisi MG , Lloret A , Addie D , Belák S , Boucraut-Baralon C , Frymus T , Gruffydd-Jones T , Hosie MJ , Lutz H , Marsilio F , Möstl K , Radford AD , Thiry E , Truyen U , Horzinek MC

J Feline Med Surg , 15(7):576-581, 01 Jul 2013

Cited by: 23 articles | PMID: 23813819

European consensus statement on leptospirosis in dogs and cats.

Schuller S , Francey T , Hartmann K , Hugonnard M , Kohn B , Nally JE , Sykes J

J Small Anim Pract , 56(3):159-179, 01 Mar 2015

Cited by: 104 articles | PMID: 25754092

Clinical leptospirosis in three cats (2001-2009).

Arbour J , Blais MC , Carioto L , Sylvestre D

J Am Anim Hosp Assoc , 48(4):256-260, 18 May 2012

Cited by: 29 articles | PMID: 22611217

Leptospira infection and shedding in cats in Thailand.

Sprißler F , Jongwattanapisan P , Luengyosluechakul S , Pusoonthornthum R , Prapasarakul N , Kurilung A , Goris M , Ahmed A , Reese S , Bergmann M , Dorsch R , Klaasen HLBM , Hartmann K

Transbound Emerg Dis , 66(2):948-956, 07 Jan 2019

Cited by: 15 articles | PMID: 30580489

Europe PMC is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

IMAGES

  1. Leptospirosis in cats: Current literature review to guide diagnosis and

    leptospirosis in cats current literature review to guide diagnosis and management

  2. (PDF) Leptospirosis in cats: Current literature review to guide

    leptospirosis in cats current literature review to guide diagnosis and management

  3. Leptospirosis in cats

    leptospirosis in cats current literature review to guide diagnosis and management

  4. Leptospirosis in cats, explained by Vets

    leptospirosis in cats current literature review to guide diagnosis and management

  5. What Leptospirosis in Cats Is and How to Treat It?

    leptospirosis in cats current literature review to guide diagnosis and management

  6. Leptospirosis in cats: Current literature review to guide diagnosis and

    leptospirosis in cats current literature review to guide diagnosis and management

VIDEO

  1. Nursing Review Vlog: Leptospirosis (Paging National Government)

  2. Leptospirosis

  3. Diagnosis, Management and Current and Future clinical trials Helios preliminary results

  4. Leptospirosis: Rat urine disease symptoms

  5. Leptospirosis is potentially fatal, but preventable: DOH

  6. Key Updates in the 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for Diagnosis & Management of Atrial Fibrillation

COMMENTS

  1. Leptospirosis in cats: Current literature review to guide diagnosis and

    The current literature on leptospirosis in cats is reviewed. To date, few case reports have been published in the field, and information has mostly been extrapolated from infections in people and dogs. This review is expected to serve as a guide for the diagnosis and management of the disease in cat …

  2. Leptospirosis in cats: Current literature review to guide diagnosis and

    This review is expected to serve as a guide for the diagnosis and management of the disease in cats. Clinical signs of leptospirosis in cats based on published studies of acute disease Figures ...

  3. Leptospirosis in cats: Current literature review to guide diagnosis and

    Leptospirosis in cats: Current literature review to guide diagnosis and management. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery . 2020 Mar 1;22(3):216-228. doi: 10.1177/1098612X20903601 Powered by Pure , Scopus & Elsevier Fingerprint Engine™

  4. Leptospirosis in cats: Current literature review to guide diagnosis and

    Leptospirosis in cats: Current literature review to guide diagnosis and management. ... Search worldwide, life-sciences literature Search. Advanced Search Coronavirus articles and preprints Search examples: "breast cancer" Smith J Recent history ...

  5. Leptospirosis in cats: Current literature review to guide diagnosis and

    Leptospirosis in cats: Current literature review to guide diagnosis and management. Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › Academic › peer-review. ... Leptospirosis, microscopic agglutination test, real-time PCR, zoonosis; ID: 11249613. Generic Portal

  6. Leptospira Species Infection in Cats: ABCD guidelines on prevention and

    In experimental and naturally infected cats, nephritis has been reported. 16-18,21 In one study, a relationship was found between polyuria/polydipsia and the presence of antibodies against Leptospira species. 15,19 A recently published case series of three cats with leptospirosis reported that all three cats suffered from renal failure, while ...

  7. Leptospirosis in cats: Current literature review to guide diagnosis and

    The current literature on leptospirosis in cats is reviewed. To date, few case reports have been published in the field, and information has mostly been extrapolated from infections in people and dogs. This review is expected to serve as a guide for the diagnosis and management of the disease in cats.

  8. Molecular and serological epidemiology of Leptospira infection in cats

    Leptospirosis is a zoonosis caused by pathogenic Leptospira spp. Cats have been reported to be infected with Leptospira spp. and shed the bacteria in the urine. However, the importance of cats as ...

  9. Feline Susceptibility to Leptospirosis and Presence of

    Reports of clinical leptospirosis in cats are rare: the clinical presentation is characterised by a plethora of signs ranging from asymptomatic to fulminant disease, making the diagnostic process challenging. ... Pastor J. Leptospirosis in Cats: Current Literature Review to Guide Diagnosis and Management. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2020; 22:216-228 ...

  10. European consensus statement on leptospirosis in dogs and cats

    Leptospirosis is a zoonotic disease with a worldwide distribution affecting most mammalian species. Clinical leptospirosis is common in dogs but appears to be rare in cats. Both dogs and cats, however, can shed leptospires in the urine. This is problematic as it can lead to exposure of humans.

  11. Molecular and serological epidemiology of Leptospira infection in cats

    Leptospirosis is a zoonosis caused by pathogenic Leptospira spp. Cats have been reported to be infected with Leptospira spp. and shed the bacteria in the urine. However, the importance of cats as an infection source for humans remains unclear. In this study, Leptospira infection in cats in Okinawa Prefecture, Japan, where leptospirosis is endemic, was investigated by leptospiral antibody and ...

  12. Evaluation of Leptospira infection and exposure in free-roaming cat

    Banked serum specimens were obtained from free-roaming cats that had been euthanized for management purposes at a large shelter in the Rio Grande Valley region of Texas throughout 2017. ... POC assays may have value in the diagnosis of leptospirosis in cats. ... Ahmed A, et al. Leptospirosis in cats: current literature review to guide diagnosis ...

  13. Leptospirosis in cats: Current literature review to guide diagnosis and

    EVIDENCE BASE:The current literature on leptospirosis in cats is reviewed. To date, few case reports have been published in the field, and information has mostly been extrapolated from infections in people and dogs. This review is expected to serve as a guide for the diagnosis and management of the disease in cats.

  14. Leptospirosis in cats: Current literature review to guide diagnosis and

    Leptospirosis in cats: Current literature review to guide diagnosis and management. Andrea Murillo, Marga Goris, Ahmed Ahmed, Rafaela Cuenca *, Josep Pastor * Autor corresponent d'aquest treball. Departament de Medicina i Cirurgia Animals; Universiteit van Amsterdam;

  15. European consensus statement on leptospirosis in dogs and cats

    The aim of this consensus statement is to raise awareness of leptospirosis and to outline the current knowledge on the epidemiology, clinical features, diagnostic tools, prevention and treatment measures relevant to canine and feline leptOSPirosis in Europe. Leptospirosis is a zoonotic disease with a worldwide distribution affecting most mammalian species. Clinical leptospirosis is common in ...

  16. PDF Leptospirosis in cats: Current literature review to guide diagnosis and

    Evidence base: The current literature on leptospirosis in cats is reviewed. To date, few case reports have been published in the field, and information has mostly been extrapolated from infections in people and dogs. This review is expected to serve as a guide for the diagnosis and management of the disease in cats.

  17. 2010 ACVIM Small Animal Consensus Statement on Leptospirosis: Diagnosis

    Diagnosis is based on acute and convalescent phase antibody titers by the microscopic agglutination test (MAT), with or without use of polymerase chain reaction assays, and the MAT does not accurately predict the infecting serogroup. This report offers a consensus opinion on the diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment, and prevention of leptospirosis in dogs, an important zoonosis. Clinical signs ...

  18. Leptospirosis in Cats: Current Literature Review To Guide Diagnosis and

    2020 Leptospirosis en gatos.pdf - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free.

  19. Leptospirosis in cats: Current literature review to guide diagnosis and

    Evidence base: The current literature on leptospirosis in cats is reviewed. To date, few case reports have been published in the field, and information has mostly been extrapolated from infections in people and dogs. This review is expected to serve as a guide for the diagnosis and management of the disease in cats. Palabras clave