data gathering procedure example in research paper quantitative pdf

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Methodology
• Data Collection Methods | Step-by-Step Guide & Examples

Data Collection Methods | Step-by-Step Guide & Examples

Published on 4 May 2022 by Pritha Bhandari .

Data collection is a systematic process of gathering observations or measurements. Whether you are performing research for business, governmental, or academic purposes, data collection allows you to gain first-hand knowledge and original insights into your research problem .

While methods and aims may differ between fields, the overall process of data collection remains largely the same. Before you begin collecting data, you need to consider:

• The  aim of the research
• The type of data that you will collect
• The methods and procedures you will use to collect, store, and process the data

To collect high-quality data that is relevant to your purposes, follow these four steps.

Table of contents

Step 1: define the aim of your research, step 2: choose your data collection method, step 3: plan your data collection procedures, step 4: collect the data, frequently asked questions about data collection.

Before you start the process of data collection, you need to identify exactly what you want to achieve. You can start by writing a problem statement : what is the practical or scientific issue that you want to address, and why does it matter?

Next, formulate one or more research questions that precisely define what you want to find out. Depending on your research questions, you might need to collect quantitative or qualitative data :

• Quantitative data is expressed in numbers and graphs and is analysed through statistical methods .
• Qualitative data is expressed in words and analysed through interpretations and categorisations.

If your aim is to test a hypothesis , measure something precisely, or gain large-scale statistical insights, collect quantitative data. If your aim is to explore ideas, understand experiences, or gain detailed insights into a specific context, collect qualitative data.

If you have several aims, you can use a mixed methods approach that collects both types of data.

• Your first aim is to assess whether there are significant differences in perceptions of managers across different departments and office locations.
• Your second aim is to gather meaningful feedback from employees to explore new ideas for how managers can improve.

Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.

Based on the data you want to collect, decide which method is best suited for your research.

• Experimental research is primarily a quantitative method.
• Interviews , focus groups , and ethnographies are qualitative methods.
• Surveys , observations, archival research, and secondary data collection can be quantitative or qualitative methods.

Carefully consider what method you will use to gather data that helps you directly answer your research questions.

When you know which method(s) you are using, you need to plan exactly how you will implement them. What procedures will you follow to make accurate observations or measurements of the variables you are interested in?

For instance, if you’re conducting surveys or interviews, decide what form the questions will take; if you’re conducting an experiment, make decisions about your experimental design .

Operationalisation

Sometimes your variables can be measured directly: for example, you can collect data on the average age of employees simply by asking for dates of birth. However, often you’ll be interested in collecting data on more abstract concepts or variables that can’t be directly observed.

Operationalisation means turning abstract conceptual ideas into measurable observations. When planning how you will collect data, you need to translate the conceptual definition of what you want to study into the operational definition of what you will actually measure.

• You ask managers to rate their own leadership skills on 5-point scales assessing the ability to delegate, decisiveness, and dependability.
• You ask their direct employees to provide anonymous feedback on the managers regarding the same topics.

You may need to develop a sampling plan to obtain data systematically. This involves defining a population , the group you want to draw conclusions about, and a sample, the group you will actually collect data from.

Your sampling method will determine how you recruit participants or obtain measurements for your study. To decide on a sampling method you will need to consider factors like the required sample size, accessibility of the sample, and time frame of the data collection.

Standardising procedures

If multiple researchers are involved, write a detailed manual to standardise data collection procedures in your study.

This means laying out specific step-by-step instructions so that everyone in your research team collects data in a consistent way – for example, by conducting experiments under the same conditions and using objective criteria to record and categorise observations.

This helps ensure the reliability of your data, and you can also use it to replicate the study in the future.

Creating a data management plan

Before beginning data collection, you should also decide how you will organise and store your data.

• If you are collecting data from people, you will likely need to anonymise and safeguard the data to prevent leaks of sensitive information (e.g. names or identity numbers).
• If you are collecting data via interviews or pencil-and-paper formats, you will need to perform transcriptions or data entry in systematic ways to minimise distortion.
• You can prevent loss of data by having an organisation system that is routinely backed up.

Finally, you can implement your chosen methods to measure or observe the variables you are interested in.

The closed-ended questions ask participants to rate their manager’s leadership skills on scales from 1 to 5. The data produced is numerical and can be statistically analysed for averages and patterns.

To ensure that high-quality data is recorded in a systematic way, here are some best practices:

• Record all relevant information as and when you obtain data. For example, note down whether or how lab equipment is recalibrated during an experimental study.
• Double-check manual data entry for errors.
• If you collect quantitative data, you can assess the reliability and validity to get an indication of your data quality.

Data collection is the systematic process by which observations or measurements are gathered in research. It is used in many different contexts by academics, governments, businesses, and other organisations.

When conducting research, collecting original data has significant advantages:

• You can tailor data collection to your specific research aims (e.g., understanding the needs of your consumers or user testing your website).
• You can control and standardise the process for high reliability and validity (e.g., choosing appropriate measurements and sampling methods ).

However, there are also some drawbacks: data collection can be time-consuming, labour-intensive, and expensive. In some cases, it’s more efficient to use secondary data that has already been collected by someone else, but the data might be less reliable.

Quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics, while qualitative research deals with words and meanings.

Quantitative methods allow you to test a hypothesis by systematically collecting and analysing data, while qualitative methods allow you to explore ideas and experiences in depth.

Reliability and validity are both about how well a method measures something:

• Reliability refers to the  consistency of a measure (whether the results can be reproduced under the same conditions).
• Validity   refers to the  accuracy of a measure (whether the results really do represent what they are supposed to measure).

If you are doing experimental research , you also have to consider the internal and external validity of your experiment.

In mixed methods research , you use both qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods to answer your research question .

Operationalisation means turning abstract conceptual ideas into measurable observations.

For example, the concept of social anxiety isn’t directly observable, but it can be operationally defined in terms of self-rating scores, behavioural avoidance of crowded places, or physical anxiety symptoms in social situations.

Before collecting data , it’s important to consider how you will operationalise the variables that you want to measure.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

Bhandari, P. (2022, May 04). Data Collection Methods | Step-by-Step Guide & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 18 June 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/research-methods/data-collection-guide/

Is this article helpful?

Pritha Bhandari

Other students also liked, qualitative vs quantitative research | examples & methods, triangulation in research | guide, types, examples, what is a conceptual framework | tips & examples.

What Data Gathering Strategies Should I Use?

• First Online: 28 June 2019

Cite this chapter

• Ray Cooksey 3 &
• Gael McDonald 4  

1967 Accesses

1 Citations

In this chapter, we review many of the data gathering strategies that can be used by postgraduates in social and behavioural research. We explore three major domains of data gathering strategies: strategies for connecting with people (encompassing interaction-based and observation-based strategies), exploring people’s handiworks (encompassing participant-centred and artefact-based strategies) and structuring people’s experiences (encompassing data-shaping and experience-focused strategies). In light of our pluralist perspective, we consider each data gathering strategy, not only as a distinct and self-contained strategy (which may encompass a range of more specific data gathering approaches), but also as part of a larger more interconnected and dynamic toolkit. Our goal is to highlight some key considerations and issues associated with each strategy that might be relevant to your decision making about which might be appropriate for you to use as part of your research journey, given your research frame, pattern(s) of guiding assumptions, contextualisations, positionings, research questions/hypotheses, scoping and shaping considerations and MU configuration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Durable hardcover edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Anderson, L. (2006). Analytic autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 5 (4), 373–395.

Article   Google Scholar  

Anderson, V. (1997). Systems thinking basics: From concepts to causal loops . Cambridge, MA: Pegasus Communications.

Google Scholar  

Angrosino, M. (2007). Doing ethnographic and observational research . London: Sage Publications.

Book   Google Scholar  

Athanasou, J. A. (1997). Introduction to educational testing . Wentworth Falls, NSW: Social Science Press.

Axelrod, R. (2007). Simulation in the social sciences. In J.-P. Rennard (Ed.), Handbook of research on nature inspired computing for economy and management (pp. 90–100). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference.

Babbie, E. (2011). The basics of social research (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Banks, M. (2007). Using visual data in qualitative research . London: Sage Publications.

Barbour, R. (2007). Doing focus groups . London: Sage Publications.

Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2013). Process tracing methods: Foundations and guidelines . Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Bechtel, R. B. (1967). Hodometer research in architecture. Milieu, 2 , 1–9.

Bennett, A., & Checkel, J. T. (Eds.). (2014). Process tracing: From metaphor to analytic tool . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Bickel, R. (2007). Multilevel analysis for applied research . New York: The Guilford Press.

Boddy, C. (2005). Projective techniques in market research: Valueless subjectivity or insightful reality? A look at the evidence for the usefulness, reliability and validity of projective techniques in market research. International Journal of Market Research, 47 (3), 239–254.

Boje, D. M. (1991). The storytelling organization: A study of story performance in an office-supply firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36 (1), 106–126.

Bond, D., & Ramsey, E. (2007). Going beyond the fence: Using projective techniques as survey tools to meet the challenges of bounded rationality. In Proceedings of the 2007 Association for Survey Computing Meeting, The Challenges of a Changing World: Developments in the Survey Process , Southampton, UK (pp. 259–270).

Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Boslaugh, S. (2007). Secondary data sources for public health: A practical guide . New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9 (2), 27–40.

Bowerman, B. L., O’Connell, R. T., & Koehler, A. B. (2005). Forecasting, time series, and regression: An applied approach (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Boyle, G. J., Saklofske, D. H., & Matthews, G. (Eds.). (2015). Measures of personality and social psychological constructs . Amsterdam: Academic Press.

Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15 (5), 662–679.

Britten, N., Campbell, R., Pope, C., Donovan, J., Morgan, M., & Pill, R. (2002). Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: A worked example. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 7 (4), 209–215.

Brown, R. V. (2005). Rational choice and judgment: Decision analysis for the decider . Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.). (2007). The Sage handbook of grounded theory . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business research methods (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2004). Constructing variables. In M. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 17–34). London: Sage Publications.

Buzan, T. (2003). The mind map book (Rev ed.). London: BBC Books.

Buzan, T. (2018). Mind map mastery . London: Watkins.

Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Campbell, R., Pound, P., Morgan, M., Daker-White, G., Britten, N., Pill, R., et al. (2011). Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research. Health Technology Assessment, 15 (43).

Canter, D., Brown, J., & Groat, L. (1985). A multiple sorting procedure for studying conceptual systems. In M. Brenner, J. Brown, & D. Canter (Eds.), The research interview: Uses and approaches (pp. 79–114). London: Academic Press.

Carmichael, G. A. (2016). Fundamentals of demographic analysis: Concepts, measures and methods . Switzerland: Springer.

Carsey, T. M., & Harden, J. J. (2013). Monte Carlo simulation and resampling methods for the social sciences . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Cassell, C., & Walsh, S. (2004). Repertory grids. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 61–72). London: Sage Publications.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Catterall, M., & Ibbotson, P. (2000). Using projective techniques in education research. British Educational Research Journal, 26 (2), 245–256.

Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

Chang, H. (2016). Autoethnography as method . London: Routledge.

Chase, S. E. (2005). Narrative inquiry: Multiple lenses, approaches, voices. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 651–679). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Checkel, J. T. (2008). Process Tracing. In A. Klotz & D. Prakash (Eds.), Qualitative methods in international relations (Research Methods Series) (pp. 114–127). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for action: A short definitive account of soft systems methodology and its use for practitioners, teachers and students . Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Chell, E. (2004). Critical incident technique. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 45–60). London: Sage Publications.

Chi, M. T. (2006). Laboratory methods for assessing experts’ and novices’ knowledge. In A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich, & R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 167–184). Cambridge. MA: Cambridge University Press.

Chilisa, B. (2012). Indigenous research methodologies . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Chilisa, B., & Tsheko, G. N. (2014). Mixed methods in indigenous research: Building relationships for sustainable intervention outcomes. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8 (3), 222–233.

Chrzanowska, J. (2002). Interviewing groups and individuals in qualitative marketing research . London: Sage Publications.

Clandinin, D. J. (Ed.). (2007). Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Cochran, W. G., & Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental designs (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Cohen, I. G., Amarasingham, R., Shah, A., Xie, B., & Lo, B. (2014). The legal and ethical concerns that arise from using complex predictive analytics in health care. Health Affairs, 33 (7), 1139–1147.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). New York: Routledge.

Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2009). Business research: A practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students . London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings . Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Cook, T. D., Campbell, D. T., & Peracchio, L. (1990). Quasi-experimentation. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 491–576). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press Inc.

Cooksey, R. W. (1996). Judgment analysis: Theory, methods, and applications . San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Cooksey, R. W. (2000). Mapping the texture of managerial decision making: A complex dynamic decision perspective. Emergence: A Journal of Complexity Issues in Organizations and Management, 2 (2), 102–122.

Cooksey, R. W. (2014). Illustrating statistical procedures: Finding meaning in quantitative data (2nd ed.). Prahran, VIC: Tilde University Press.

Cooksey, R. W., Freebody, P., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2007). Assessment as judgment-in-context: Analyzing how teachers evaluate students’ writing. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13 (5), 401–434.

Cooksey, R. W., & Loomis, R. J. (1979). Visitor locomotor exploration of a museum gallery . Paper presented at the 50th Annual Meeting of the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association, Las Vegas, NV.

Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis . New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Corti, L., Thompson, P., & Fink, J. (2004). Preserving, sharing and reusing data from qualitative research: Methods and strategies. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 288–300). London: Sage Publications.

Cowton, C. J. (1998). The use of secondary data in business ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 423–434.

Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narratives in social science research . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Dick, P. (2004). Discourse analysis. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 203–213). London: Sage Publications.

Duncan, M. (2004). Autoethnography: Critical appreciation of an emerging art. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3 (4), 28–39.

Durlak, J. A. (1995). Understanding meta-analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistic (pp. 319–352). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Eden, C., & Ackermann, F. (2002). A mapping framework for strategy making. In A. Huff & M. Jenkins (Eds.), Mapping strategic knowledge (pp. 173–195). London: Sage Publications.

Edmunds, H. (1999). The focus group research handbook . Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books.

Elliott, J. (2005). Using narrative in social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches . London: Sage Publications.

Elliott, H. (1997). The use of diaries in sociological research on health experience. Sociological Research Online , 2 (2). Retrieved August 11, 2018, form http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/2/7.html .

Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Enders, W. (2014). Applied econometric time series (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Eppler, M. J. (2006). A comparison between concept maps, mind maps, conceptual diagrams, and visual metaphors as complementary tools for knowledge construction and sharing. Information Visualization, 5, 202–210.

Ericsson, K. A. (2003). Valid and non-reactive verbalization of thoughts during performance of tasks: Towards a solution to the central problems of introspection as a source of scientific data. In A. Jack & A. Roepstorff (Eds.), Trusting the subject: The use of introspective evidence in cognitive science (Vol. 1, pp. 1–18). Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic.

Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data (Rev ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Evans, W. (2015). Test wiseness: An examination of cue-using strategies. The Journal of Experimental Education, 52 (3), 141–144.

Farrington, D. P., & Knight, B. J. (1979). Two non-reactive field experiments on stealing from a ‘lost’ letter. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18 (3), 277–284.

Fayyad, U., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., & Smyth, P. (1996). From data mining to knowledge discovery in databases. AI magazine, 17 (3), 37.

Fielding, N. G., Lee, R. M., & Blank, G. (Eds.). (2008). The Sage handbook of online research methods . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Finch, H., & Lewis, J. (2003). Focus groups. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 170–198). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51 (4), 327–358.

Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Fogarty, G. (2008). Principles and applications of education and psychological testing. In J. A. Athanasou (Ed.), Adult educational psychology (pp. 351–384). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Fothergill, S., Loft, S., & Neal, A. (2009). ATC-lab advanced: An air traffic control simulator with realism and control. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 41 (1), 118–127.

Frazer, L., & Lawley, M. (2000). Questionnaire design & administration . Milton, QLD: Wiley.

Frumkin, N. (2015). Guide to economic indicators (4th ed.). London: Routledge.

Gabriel, Y., & Griffiths, D. S. (2004). Stories in organizational research. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 114–126). London: Sage Publications.

Galletta, A. (2013). Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication . New York: New York University Press.

Gamst, G. C., Liang, C. T. H., & Der-Karabetian, A. (2011). Handbook of multicultural measures . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Gandomi, A., & Haider, M. (2015). Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics. International Journal of Information Management, 35 (2), 137–144.

Gilbert, N. (2008). Agent-based models . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Gilbert, N., & Troitzsch, K. G. (2005). Simulation for the social scientist (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill International.

Gillham, B. (2005). Research interviewing: The range of techniques . Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.

Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Glass, G. V., Willson, V. L., & Gottman, J. M. (2008). Design and analysis of time-series experiments . Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Goodwin, J. (Ed.). (2012a). Sage secondary data analysis: Volume 1: Using secondary sources and secondary analysis . London: Sage Publications.

Goodwin, J. (Ed.). (2012b). Sage secondary data analysis: Volume 2: Quantitative approaches to secondary analysis . London: Sage Publications.

Goodwin, J. (Ed.). (2012c). Sage secondary data analysis: Volume 3: Qualitative data and research in secondary analysis . London: Sage Publications.

Goodwin, J. (Ed.). (2012d). Sage secondary data analysis: Volume 4: Ethical, methodological and practical issues in secondary analysis . London: Sage Publications.

Graco, W. J. (2001). Research into identification and classification of patterns of non-compliance in data using a doctor-shopper sample . Unpublished PhD thesis, School of Marketing and Management, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.

Gray, D. E. (2014). Doing research in the real world (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Grimmer, J., & Stewart, B. M. (2013). Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political analysis, 21 (3), 267–297.

Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Guillemin, M. (2004,). Understanding illness: Using drawings as a research method. Qualitative Health Research , 14 (2), 272–289.

Gupta, V., & Lehal, G. S. (2009). A survey of text mining techniques and applications. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence, 1 (1), 60–76.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (SEM) . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Han, J., Kamber, M., & Pei, J. (2012). Data mining: Concepts and techniques (3rd ed.). Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

Hand, D. J. (2004). Measurement theory and practice: The world through quantification . New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Hancock, G. R. (2004). Experimental, quasi-experimental and nonexperimental design with latent variables. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 317–334). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Haladyna, T. M. (2004). Developing and validating multiple-choice test items (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

Hamm, R. M. (1988). Moment-by-moment variation in experts’ analytic and intuitive cognitive activity. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 18 (5), 757–776.

Hammond, K. R., Frederick, E., Robillard, N., & Victor, D. (1989). Application of cognitive theory to the student-teacher dialogue. In D. A. Evans & V. L. Patel (Eds.), Cognitive science in medicine. Biomedical modeling . Cambridge, MA: M1T Press (pp. 173–210).

Hammond, K. R., & Stewart, T. R. (2001). The essential Brunswik: Beginnings, explications, applications . New York: Oxford University Press.

Hammond, K. R., & Wascoe, N. E. (1980). Realizations of Brunswik’s representative design . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Harper, D. (2005). What’s new visually? In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 747–763). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology . Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Hinds, P. S., Vogel, R. J., & Clarke-Steffen, L. (1997). The possibilities and pitfalls of doing a secondary analysis of a qualitative data set. Qualitative Health Research, 7 (3), 408–424.

Hine, D. W., Montiel, C. J., Cooksey, R. W., & Lewko, J. (2005). Mental models of poverty in developing nations: A Canada-Philippines contrast. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36 (3), 283–303.

Hine, D. W., Gifford, R., Heath, Y., Cooksey, R., & Quain, P. (2009). A cue utilization approach for investigating harvest decisions in commons dilemmas. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39 (3), 564–588.

Hodson, R. (1999). Analyzing documentary accounts . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Hofferth, S. L. (2005). Secondary data analysis in family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67 (4), 891–907.

Hughes, J. & Goodwin, J. (Eds). (2014a). Documentary & archival research: Volume 1: Human documents – Perspectives and approaches . London: Sage Publications.

Hughes, J. & Goodwin, J. (Eds). (2014b). Documentary & archival research: Volume 3: Human documents in social research . London: Sage Publications.

Hughes, J. & Goodwin, J. (Eds). (2014c). Documentary & archival research: Volume 4: Archival research . London: Sage Publications.

Hyland, M. (1981). Introduction to theoretical psychology . London: Macmillan Press.

Irwin, S. (2013). Qualitative secondary data analysis: Ethics, epistemology and context. Progress in Development Studies, 13 (4), 295–306.

Jasper, J. D., & Shapiro, J. (2002). MouseTrace: A better mousetrap for catching decision processes. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34 (3), 364–374.

Johnson, B. (2001). Towards a new classification of nonexperimental quantitative research. Educational Researcher, 30 (2), 3–13.

Jones, S. H. (2005). Autoethnography: Making the personal political. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 763–791). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Jorgensen, D. (1989). Participant observation: A methodology for human studies . Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Kane, M., & Trochim, W. M. K. (2007). Concept mapping for planning and evaluation . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Kamberelis, G., Dimitriadis, G., & Welker, A. (2018). Focus group research and/in figured worlds. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 692–716). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Kaptchuk, T. J. (2001). The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial: Gold standard or golden calf? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54 (6), 541–549.

Keeves, J. P. (1997). Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

Kellehear, A. (1993). The unobtrusive observer: A guide to methods . St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

Keppel, G., & Wickens, T. D. (2004). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Ker, J. S., Hesketh, E. A., Anderson, F., & Johnston, D. A. (2006). Can a ward simulation exercise achieve the realism that reflects the complexity of everyday practice junior doctors encounter? Medical Teacher, 28 (4), 330–334.

King, N. (2004). Using templates in the thematic analysis of data. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 256–270). London: Sage Publications.

Kirk, R. E. (2013). Experimental design: Procedures for behavioral sciences (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. (2004). Meta-analysis. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 281–300). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts . Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Kovach, M. (2018). Doing indigenous methodologies: A letter to a research class. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 214–234). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Krippendorf, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Kumar, L., & Bhatia, P. K. (2013). Text mining: concepts, process and applications. Journal of Global Research in Computer Science, 4 (3), 36–39.

Kvale, S. (2007). Doing interviews . London: Sage Publications.

L’Eplattenier, B. E. (2009). An argument for archival research methods: thinking beyond methodology. College English, 72 (1), 67–79.

Lamprianou, I. (2008). Introduction to psychometrics: The case of Rasch models. In J. A. Athanasou (Ed.), Adult educational psychology (pp. 385–418). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Lane, D. C. (1995). On a resurgence of management simulations and games. Journal of the Operations Research Society, 46 (5), 604–625.

Lane, S., Raymond, M. R., & Haladyna, T. M. (2015). Handbook of test development (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

Laukkanen, M. (1998). Conducting causal mapping research: Opportunities and challenges. In C. Eden & J. Spender (Eds.), Managerial and organizational cognition: Theory, methods and research (pp. 168–191). London: Sage Publications.

Lee, A. T. (2005). Flight simulation: virtual environments in aviation . London: Routledge.

Legard, R., Keegan, J., & Ward, K. (2003). In-depth interviews. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 138–169). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Louviere, J. J. (1988). Analyzing decision making: Metric conjoint analysis . Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Maani, K. E., & Cavana, R. Y. (2007). Systems thinking, systems dynamics: Managing change and complexity (2nd ed.). North Shore, NZ: Pearson Education New Zealand.

Malhotra, N. K., Hall, J., Shaw, M. & Oppenheim, P. P. (2008). Essentials of marketing research: An applied approach (2nd Ed.). French’s Forest, NSW: Pearson Education.

Margolis, E., & Pauwels, L. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of visual research methods . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Margolis, E., & Zunjarwad, R. (2018). Visual research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 600–626). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17 (2), 13–17.

McAuley, J. (2004). Hermeneutic understanding. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 192–202). London: Sage Publications.

McDonald, S., Daniels, K., & Harris, C. (2004). Cognitive mapping in organizational research. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 73–85). London: Sage Publications.

Meier, P. S. (2007). Mind-mapping: A tool for eliciting and representing knowledge held by diverse informants. Social Research Update, 52, 1–4.

Mennecke, B., Roche, E., Bray, D., Konsynski, B., Lester, J., Rowe, M., et al. (2008). Second Life and other virtual worlds: A roadmap for research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 22 (Article 20), 371–388. Retrieved August 11, 2018, from https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1015&context=scm_pubs .

Meyer, B. D. (1995). Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13 (2), 151–161.

Miller, J. H., & Page, S. E. (2007). Complex adaptive systems: An introduction to computational models of social life . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Milligan, G. W. (1981). A Monte Carlo study of thirty internal criterion measures for cluster analysis. Psychometrika, 46 (2), 187–199.

Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., & Hays, T. (2008). In-depth interviewing: Principles, techniques, analysis . Sydney: Pearson Education.

Montgomery, P., & Bailey, P. H. (2007). Field notes and theoretical memos in grounded theory. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 29 (1), 65–79.

Mooney, C. Z. (1997). Monte Carlo simulation . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Muchiri, M. (2006). Transformational leader behaviours, social processes of leadership and substitutes for leadership as predictors of employee commitment, efficacy, citizenship behaviours and performance outcomes . Unpublished PhD thesis, New England Business School, University of New England.

Murdock, S. H., Kelley, C., Jordan, J., Pecotte, B., & Luedke, A. (2016). Demographics: A guide to methods and data sources for media, business, and government . London: Routledge.

Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies (Vol. 11). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

North, M. (2012). Data mining for the masses . Athens: Global Text Project. Retrieved August 11, 2018, from https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/39657706/North_-_Data_Mining_for_the_Masses_-_2012.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1533962896&Signature=3h603Aq1BUPPSz2Svg0lC9RvwU0%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DData_Mining.pdf .

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

O’Cass, A. (1998). Reconceptualising and reconstructing consumer involvement: modelling involvement in a nomological network of relevant constructs: Casting the net wider or just fishing around . Unpublished PhD thesis, School of Marketing and Management, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.

Olaru, D., Purchase, S., & Denize, S. (2009). Using docking/replication to verify and validate computational models. In Proceedings of the 18th World IMACS/MODSIM Congress , Cairns, Queensland (pp. 4432–4438). Retrieved August 11, 2018, from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0edc/80bb4313dab4a0e0ee94a508a5a2883d4ebd.pdf .

Omodei, M. M., & Wearing, A. J. (1995). The Fire Chief microworld generating program: An illustration of computer-simulated microworlds as an experimental paradigm for studying complex decision-making behavior. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27 (3), 303–316.

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Leech, N. L., & Collins, K. M. (2010). Innovative data collection strategies in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 15 (3), 696–726.

Ortlipp, M. (2008). Keeping and using reflective journals in the qualitative research process. The Qualitative Report, 13 (4), 695–705.

Paterson, B. L., Thorne, S. E., Canam, C., & Jillings, C. (2001). Meta-study of qualitative health research: A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker . New York: Cambridge University Press.

Phellas, C. N., Bloch, A., & Seale, C. (2012). Structured methods: interviews, questionnaires and observation. In C. Seale (Ed.), Researching society and culture (3rd ed., pp. 181–205). London: Sage Publications.

Pidd, M. (2009). Tools for thinking: Modelling in management science (3rd ed.). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Pierce, C. A., & Aguinis, H. (1997). Using virtual reality technology in organizational behavior research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18 (5), 407–410.

Pink, S. (2013). Doing visual ethnography . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Place, U. T. (1992). The role of the ethnomethodological experiment in the empirical investigation of social norms and its application to conceptual analysis. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 22 (4), 461–474.

Plowright, D. (2011). Using mixed methods: Frameworks for an integrated methodology . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Prasad, A. (2002). The contest over meaning: Hermeneutics as an interpretive methodology for understanding texts. Organizational Research Methods, 5 (1), 12–33.

Proctor, T. (2010). Creative problem solving for managers (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Provost, F., & Fawcett, T. (2013). Data science and its relationship to big data and data-driven decision making. Big Data, 1 (1), 51–59.

Punch, K. (2003). Survey research: The basics . London: Sage Publications.

Railsback, S. F., & Grimm, V. (2012). Agent-based and individual-based modeling: A practical introduction . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Rapley, T. (2007). Doing conversation, discourse and document analysis . London: Sage Publications.

Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. B., Willson, V. L., & Willson, V. (2010). Measurement and assessment in education (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education International.

Richmond, B. (2004). An introduction to systems thinking: STELLA software . Lebanon, OH: IEEE Systems.

Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (Eds.). (1991). Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes . San Diego: Academic Press.

Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Ross, G. (2001). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials . London: Sage Publications.

Rowlinson, M. (2004). Historical analysis of company documents. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 301–311). London: Sage Publications.

Rymaszewski, M., Au, W. J., Wallace, M., Winters, C., Ondrejka, C., & Batstone-Cunningham, B. (2007). Second life: The official guide . Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Sandall, J. L. (2006). Navigating pathways through complex systems of interacting problems: Strategic management of native vegetation policy . Unpublished PhD thesis, New England Business School, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.

Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S., & Emden, C. (1997). Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques. Research in Nursing & Health, 20 (4), 365–371.

Samra-Fredericks, D. (2004). Talk-in-interaction/conversation analysis. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 214–227). London: Sage Publications.

Sapsford, R. (2007). Survey research (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

Schembri, S., & Boyle, M. V. (2013). Visual ethnography: Achieving rigorous and authentic interpretations. Journal of Business Research, 66 (9), 1251–1254.

Schkade, D. A., & Payne, J. W. (1994). How people respond to contingent valuation questions: A verbal protocol analysis of willingness to pay for an environmental regulation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26 (1), 88–109.

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2014). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Schmitt, R. (2005). Systematic metaphor analysis as a method of qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 10 (2), 358–394.

Schreiber, R., Crooks, D., & Stern, P. N. (1997). Qualitative meta-analysis. In J. Morse (Ed.), Completing a qualitative project: Details and dialogue (pp. 311–326). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2001). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference (2nd ed.). Boston: Cengage.

Shum, D., O’Gorman, J., Creed, P., & Myors, B. (2017). Psychological testing and assessment ebook (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R., & Smith, B. (1994). The fifth discipline field book . London: Nicholas Brealey.

Shiratori, R., Arai, K., & Kato, F. (2005). Gaming, simulations and society: Research scope and perspective . Tokyo: Springer.

Sloan, L., & Quan-Haase, A. (Eds.). (2017). The Sage handbook of social media research methods . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Small, S. D., Wuerz, R. C., Simon, R., Shapiro, N., Conn, A., & Setnik, G. (1999). Demonstration of high-fidelity simulation team training for emergency medicine. Academic Emergency Medicine, 6 (4), 312–323.

Smith, A. E., & Humphreys, M. S. (2006). Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping. Behavior Research Methods, 38 (2), 262–279.

Smith, E. (2008). Pitfalls and promises: The use of secondary data analysis in educational research. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56 (3), 323–339.

Smith, M. (2007). Research methods in accounting . Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Solórzano, D. G., & Yosso, T. J. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8 (1), 23–44.

Stengel, D. N., & Chaffe-Stengel, P. (2012). Working with economic indicators: Interpretation and sources . New York: Business Expert Press.

Sterman, J. S. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world . New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Stewart, D., Shamdasani, P. N., & Rook, D. W. (2007). Focus groups: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Stiles, D. (2004,). Pictorial representation. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 127–140). London: Sage Publications.

Stuart, E. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2008). Best practice in quasi-experimental designs: Matching methods for causal inference. In J. W. Osborne (Ed.), Best practices in quantitative methods (pp. 155–176). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Sue, V. M., & Ritter, L. A. (2012). Conducting online surveys (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Suri, H. (2011). Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal, 11 (2), 63–75.

Symon, G. (2004). Qualitative research diaries. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 98–113). London: Sage Publications.

Taber, C. S., & Timpone, R. J. (1996). Computational modeling . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Tansey, O. (2007). Process tracing and elite interviewing: A case for non-probability sampling. PS: Political Science & Politics , 40 (4), 765–772.

Thornton III, G. C., & Kedharnath, U. (2013). Work sample tests. In K. F. Geisinger et al. (Eds.), APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology, Vol. 1. Test theory and testing and assessment in industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 533–550). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Trenor, J. M., Miller, M. K., & Gipson, K. G. (2011). Utilization of a think-aloud protocol to cognitively validate a survey instrument identifying social capital resources of engineering undergraduates. In Electronic Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition , Vancouver, CA (pp. 22.1656.1–22.1656.15). Retrieved August 11, 2018, from https://peer.asee.org/utilization-of-a-think-aloud-protocol-to-cognitively-validate-a-survey-instrument-identifying-social-capital-resources-of-engineering-undergraduates .

van Someren, M. W., Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. A. C. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical approach to modeling cognitive processes . London: Academic Press.

Veal, A. J. (2005). Business research methods: A managerial approach (2nd ed.). French’s Forest, NSW: Pearson Education.

Walker, S. J. (2014). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. International Journal of Advertising, 33 (1), 181–183.

Walsh, J. J. (1997). Projective testing techniques. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology and measurement: An international handbook (2nd ed., pp. 954–958). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

Walsh, S., & Clegg, C. (2004). Soft systems analysis: Reflections and update. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 334–348). London: Sage Publications.

Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2005). Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50 (2), 204–211.

Waddington, D. (2004). Participant observation. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 154–164). London: Sage Publications.

Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., & Sechrest, L. (2000). Unobtrusive measures (Rev ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Webster, J. G. (2015). The physiological measurement handbook . Boca Raton: CRC Press.

Wilcox, R. R. (1997). Simulation as a research technique. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology and measurement: An international handbook (2nd ed., pp. 150–154). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo . Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. Retrieved August 11, 2018, from http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/ .

Wilensky, U. (2003). NetLogo Traffic Grid model . Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. Retrieved August 11, 2018, from http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/models/TrafficGrid .

Williams, J. H. (2014). Defining and measuring nature: The make of all things . San Raphael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.

Wybo, J. L. (2008). The role of simulation exercises in the assessment of robustness and resilience of private or public organizations. In H. J. Pasman & I. A Kirillov (Eds.), Resilience of cities to terrorist and other threats (pp. 491–507). Dordrecht: Springer.

Yamarone, R. (2017). The economic indicator handbook: How to evaluate economic trends to maximize profits and minimize losses . Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish . New York: The Guilford Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

UNE Business School, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia

Ray Cooksey

RMIT University Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Gael McDonald

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ray Cooksey .

Appendix: Clarifying Experimental/Quasi-experimental Design Jargon

These contrasting concepts provide insights into the way that researchers, who implement the Manipulative experience-focused strategy under the positivist pattern of guiding assumptions, talk or write about certain features of their research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cooksey, R., McDonald, G. (2019). What Data Gathering Strategies Should I Use?. In: Surviving and Thriving in Postgraduate Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7747-1_14

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7747-1_14

Published : 28 June 2019

Publisher Name : Springer, Singapore

Print ISBN : 978-981-13-7746-4

Online ISBN : 978-981-13-7747-1

eBook Packages : Education Education (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• Data Collection | Definition, Methods & Examples

Data Collection | Definition, Methods & Examples

Published on June 5, 2020 by Pritha Bhandari . Revised on June 21, 2023.

Data collection is a systematic process of gathering observations or measurements. Whether you are performing research for business, governmental or academic purposes, data collection allows you to gain first-hand knowledge and original insights into your research problem .

While methods and aims may differ between fields, the overall process of data collection remains largely the same. Before you begin collecting data, you need to consider:

• The  aim of the research
• The type of data that you will collect
• The methods and procedures you will use to collect, store, and process the data

To collect high-quality data that is relevant to your purposes, follow these four steps.

Table of contents

Step 1: define the aim of your research, step 2: choose your data collection method, step 3: plan your data collection procedures, step 4: collect the data, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about data collection.

Before you start the process of data collection, you need to identify exactly what you want to achieve. You can start by writing a problem statement : what is the practical or scientific issue that you want to address and why does it matter?

Next, formulate one or more research questions that precisely define what you want to find out. Depending on your research questions, you might need to collect quantitative or qualitative data :

• Quantitative data is expressed in numbers and graphs and is analyzed through statistical methods .
• Qualitative data is expressed in words and analyzed through interpretations and categorizations.

If your aim is to test a hypothesis , measure something precisely, or gain large-scale statistical insights, collect quantitative data. If your aim is to explore ideas, understand experiences, or gain detailed insights into a specific context, collect qualitative data. If you have several aims, you can use a mixed methods approach that collects both types of data.

• Your first aim is to assess whether there are significant differences in perceptions of managers across different departments and office locations.
• Your second aim is to gather meaningful feedback from employees to explore new ideas for how managers can improve.

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

Based on the data you want to collect, decide which method is best suited for your research.

• Experimental research is primarily a quantitative method.
• Interviews , focus groups , and ethnographies are qualitative methods.
• Surveys , observations, archival research and secondary data collection can be quantitative or qualitative methods.

Carefully consider what method you will use to gather data that helps you directly answer your research questions.

When you know which method(s) you are using, you need to plan exactly how you will implement them. What procedures will you follow to make accurate observations or measurements of the variables you are interested in?

For instance, if you’re conducting surveys or interviews, decide what form the questions will take; if you’re conducting an experiment, make decisions about your experimental design (e.g., determine inclusion and exclusion criteria ).

Operationalization

Sometimes your variables can be measured directly: for example, you can collect data on the average age of employees simply by asking for dates of birth. However, often you’ll be interested in collecting data on more abstract concepts or variables that can’t be directly observed.

Operationalization means turning abstract conceptual ideas into measurable observations. When planning how you will collect data, you need to translate the conceptual definition of what you want to study into the operational definition of what you will actually measure.

• You ask managers to rate their own leadership skills on 5-point scales assessing the ability to delegate, decisiveness and dependability.
• You ask their direct employees to provide anonymous feedback on the managers regarding the same topics.

You may need to develop a sampling plan to obtain data systematically. This involves defining a population , the group you want to draw conclusions about, and a sample, the group you will actually collect data from.

Your sampling method will determine how you recruit participants or obtain measurements for your study. To decide on a sampling method you will need to consider factors like the required sample size, accessibility of the sample, and timeframe of the data collection.

Standardizing procedures

If multiple researchers are involved, write a detailed manual to standardize data collection procedures in your study.

This means laying out specific step-by-step instructions so that everyone in your research team collects data in a consistent way – for example, by conducting experiments under the same conditions and using objective criteria to record and categorize observations. This helps you avoid common research biases like omitted variable bias or information bias .

This helps ensure the reliability of your data, and you can also use it to replicate the study in the future.

Creating a data management plan

Before beginning data collection, you should also decide how you will organize and store your data.

• If you are collecting data from people, you will likely need to anonymize and safeguard the data to prevent leaks of sensitive information (e.g. names or identity numbers).
• If you are collecting data via interviews or pencil-and-paper formats, you will need to perform transcriptions or data entry in systematic ways to minimize distortion.
• You can prevent loss of data by having an organization system that is routinely backed up.

Finally, you can implement your chosen methods to measure or observe the variables you are interested in.

The closed-ended questions ask participants to rate their manager’s leadership skills on scales from 1–5. The data produced is numerical and can be statistically analyzed for averages and patterns.

To ensure that high quality data is recorded in a systematic way, here are some best practices:

• Record all relevant information as and when you obtain data. For example, note down whether or how lab equipment is recalibrated during an experimental study.
• Double-check manual data entry for errors.
• If you collect quantitative data, you can assess the reliability and validity to get an indication of your data quality.

If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Student’s  t -distribution
• Normal distribution
• Null and Alternative Hypotheses
• Chi square tests
• Confidence interval
• Cluster sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Data cleansing
• Reproducibility vs Replicability
• Peer review
• Likert scale

Research bias

• Implicit bias
• Framing effect
• Cognitive bias
• Placebo effect
• Hawthorne effect
• Hindsight bias
• Affect heuristic

Data collection is the systematic process by which observations or measurements are gathered in research. It is used in many different contexts by academics, governments, businesses, and other organizations.

When conducting research, collecting original data has significant advantages:

• You can tailor data collection to your specific research aims (e.g. understanding the needs of your consumers or user testing your website)
• You can control and standardize the process for high reliability and validity (e.g. choosing appropriate measurements and sampling methods )

However, there are also some drawbacks: data collection can be time-consuming, labor-intensive and expensive. In some cases, it’s more efficient to use secondary data that has already been collected by someone else, but the data might be less reliable.

Quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics, while qualitative research deals with words and meanings.

Quantitative methods allow you to systematically measure variables and test hypotheses . Qualitative methods allow you to explore concepts and experiences in more detail.

Reliability and validity are both about how well a method measures something:

• Reliability refers to the  consistency of a measure (whether the results can be reproduced under the same conditions).
• Validity   refers to the  accuracy of a measure (whether the results really do represent what they are supposed to measure).

If you are doing experimental research, you also have to consider the internal and external validity of your experiment.

Operationalization means turning abstract conceptual ideas into measurable observations.

For example, the concept of social anxiety isn’t directly observable, but it can be operationally defined in terms of self-rating scores, behavioral avoidance of crowded places, or physical anxiety symptoms in social situations.

Before collecting data , it’s important to consider how you will operationalize the variables that you want to measure.

In mixed methods research , you use both qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods to answer your research question .

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Bhandari, P. (2023, June 21). Data Collection | Definition, Methods & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved June 18, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/data-collection/

Is this article helpful?

Pritha Bhandari

Other students also liked, qualitative vs. quantitative research | differences, examples & methods, sampling methods | types, techniques & examples, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".

I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”

Data Gathering Procedure

Ai generator.

A data gathering procedure is a systematic approach used to collect information from various sources for analysis and decision-making. This process ensures that the data collected is accurate, reliable, and relevant to the specific objectives of a study or project. As part of this procedure, conducting a data gap analysis identifies any missing information that could affect the results. Implementing a data quality assurance plan ensures that the data collected meets predefined standards of accuracy and reliability. The findings are then compiled into a data analysis report for thorough evaluation. Additionally, when applying for a related position, a data analyst cover letter should highlight your expertise in these areas to demonstrate your proficiency in data management and analysis.

What is Data Gathering Procedure?

A data gathering procedure is a structured method for collecting information needed for research, analysis, or decision-making. This process involves identifying what data is required, determining the sources of this data, selecting appropriate collection methods, and ensuring that the information gathered is accurate and useful. Key components of this procedure include creating a data inventory to catalog all data sources, developing a data analysis plan to guide the analysis process, and implementing a data confidentiality agreement to protect sensitive information and ensure ethical data handling practices.

Examples of Data Gathering Procedure

• Questionnaires
• Focus Groups
• Observations
• Experiments
• Sensor Data Collection
• Online Polls
• Web Analytics
• Social Media Monitoring
• Transaction Records
• Case Studies
• Field Research
• Database Mining
• Content Analysis

Types of Data Gathering Procedure

Data gathering procedures can be categorized based on the nature of the data and the methods used to collect it. Here are the primary types:

1. Surveys and Questionnaires

• Description : Collecting data through structured sets of questions provided to respondents.
• Usage : Commonly used in market research, social sciences, and customer feedback.
• Methods : Can be conducted via online forms, paper forms, or telephone.

2. Interviews

• Description : Gathering detailed information through direct interaction with individuals.
• Usage : Used in qualitative research, journalism, and human resources.
• Methods : Can be face-to-face, over the phone, or via video conferencing.
• Types : Structured (fixed set of questions), semi-structured (guided with some flexibility), unstructured (open-ended and conversational).

3. Observations

• Description : Collecting data by watching and recording behaviors or events as they occur.
• Usage : Common in social sciences, anthropology, and usability testing.
• Methods : Participant observation (researcher is involved in the activity), non-participant observation (researcher observes without direct involvement).

4. Document and Records Review

• Description : Analyzing existing documents and records to gather data.
• Usage : Used in historical research, policy analysis, and compliance audits.
• Methods : Reviewing reports, memos, meeting minutes, financial records, and more.

5. Experiments

• Description : Conducting controlled tests to gather data on specific variables.
• Usage : Common in scientific research, psychology, and product testing.
• Methods : Laboratory experiments, field experiments, and A/B testing.

6. Focus Groups

• Description : Collecting data through guided group discussions on a particular topic.
• Usage : Used in market research, product development, and social research.
• Methods : Facilitated discussions with a small group of participants to explore opinions and attitudes.

7. Field Studies

• Description : Collecting data in a natural setting where the phenomenon occurs.
• Usage : Common in ecology, anthropology, and social sciences.
• Methods : Involves immersive observation and interaction in the natural environment.

8. Case Studies

• Description : In-depth analysis of a single case or a small number of cases.
• Usage : Used in business, law, education, and social sciences.
• Methods : Comprehensive examination of documents, interviews, and observations related to the case.

9. Online Data Collection

• Description : Using digital tools and platforms to gather data.
• Usage : Common in modern market research, social media analysis, and web analytics.
• Methods : Web surveys, social media monitoring, data mining, and online forums.

10. Sensors and Instrumentation

• Description : Using devices to measure and record data from the physical environment.
• Usage : Common in environmental science, engineering, and healthcare.
• Methods : Sensors for temperature, humidity, movement, and medical instruments.

Importance of Data Gathering Procedure

Data gathering is crucial because it provides the foundation for informed decision-making and strategic planning. Accurate and comprehensive data collection allows organizations to understand trends, identify opportunities, and address challenges effectively. It enhances the reliability of research findings, supports evidence-based practices, and ensures that decisions are grounded in factual information. Moreover, systematic data gathering helps in tracking performance, measuring outcomes, and improving processes, ultimately contributing to the success and sustainability of businesses, academic research, and various other fields. The information collected is often compiled into a data report for detailed review. Data analysis is then performed to extract insights, while data analytics in business helps drive strategic decisions and optimize operations.

Steps to Follow for Data Gathering Procedure

Data gathering is a critical process that requires careful planning and execution. Here are the key steps to follow:

1. Define Objectives

• Purpose : Clearly outline the goals and objectives of the data collection process.
• Questions to Ask : What information is needed? Why is it needed? How will it be used?

2. Identify Data Sources

• Primary Sources : Direct sources such as surveys, interviews, and observations.
• Secondary Sources : Existing data such as books, reports, and online databases.

3. Choose Data Collection Methods

• Surveys and Questionnaires : Structured tools for collecting data from a large audience.
• Interviews : Detailed, qualitative data through direct interaction.
• Observations : Recording behaviors or events as they occur.
• Document Review : Analyzing existing documents and records.

4. Develop Data Collection Instruments

• Design Tools : Create surveys, interview guides, observation checklists, etc.
• Pilot Testing : Test the instruments on a small scale to ensure clarity and reliability.

5. Determine Sampling Method

• Sampling Techniques : Random sampling, stratified sampling, or convenience sampling.
• Sample Size : Ensure the sample is representative of the larger population.

6. Collect Data

• Implement Plan : Use the selected methods to gather data.
• Maintain Consistency : Follow the planned procedures to ensure data consistency and reliability.

7. Ensure Data Quality

• Validation : Check for accuracy, completeness, and consistency of data.
• Address Issues : Correct any errors or inconsistencies found during validation.

8. Store and Manage Data

• Data Organization : Organize data systematically for easy access and analysis.
• Secure Storage : Ensure data is stored securely to protect confidentiality and integrity.

9. Analyze Data

• Data Analysis Techniques : Use statistical tools and methods to interpret the data.
• Extract Insights : Identify patterns, trends, and key findings.

10. Report Findings

• Documentation : Prepare a detailed report of the data collection process and findings.
• Presentation : Share the results with stakeholders through presentations, reports, or dashboards.

Common Challenges in Data Gathering Procedure

Data gathering is a crucial process in research and analysis, but it comes with several challenges that can impact the quality and reliability of the collected data. Here are some common challenges:

1. Data Quality and Accuracy

• Issue : Ensuring that the data collected is accurate and reliable.
• Impact : Poor data quality can lead to incorrect conclusions and decisions.

2. Sampling Issues

• Issue : Choosing a representative sample size and method.
• Impact : Biased samples can skew results and reduce the validity of the study.

3. Respondent Availability and Willingness

• Issue : Difficulty in reaching respondents and securing their participation.
• Impact : Low response rates can lead to incomplete data and less reliable results.

4. Data Privacy and Confidentiality

• Issue : Ensuring the privacy and confidentiality of respondents’ information.
• Impact : Breaches can lead to legal issues and loss of trust.

5. Resource Constraints

Issue : Limited time, budget, and personnel for data collection.

Impact : Resource constraints can lead to shortcuts that compromise data quality.

6. Data Integration and Compatibility

• Issue : Combining data from different sources and formats.
• Impact : Incompatibility can lead to difficulties in data analysis and interpretation.

7. Technological Challenges

• Issue : Using and maintaining data collection tools and technologies.
• Impact : Technological failures can result in data loss or inaccurate data collection.

8. Cultural and Language Barriers

• Issue : Differences in culture and language among respondents.
• Impact : Misunderstandings and misinterpretations can affect data accuracy.

9. Ethical Considerations

• Issue : Ensuring ethical standards in data collection.
• Impact : Ethical breaches can lead to harm to participants and discredit the research.

10. Data Overload

• Issue : Collecting excessive amounts of data.
• Impact : Data overload can make analysis complex and time-consuming, potentially obscuring key insights.

Uses of Data Gathering Procedure

• Informed Decision-Making : Data gathering procedures provide accurate and relevant data, enabling organizations to make informed decisions. By systematically collecting and analyzing data, businesses can identify trends, opportunities, and potential risks, leading to better strategic planning and problem-solving.
• Market Research : In business, data gathering is crucial for market research. It helps companies understand customer needs, preferences, and behavior. This information is essential for developing effective marketing strategies, product development, and competitive analysis.
• Performance Measurement : Organizations use data gathering procedures to measure performance and track progress toward goals. Key performance indicators (KPIs) and other metrics are collected and analyzed to assess efficiency, productivity, and overall performance.
• Product Development : Data gathering is used to collect feedback from customers and stakeholders during the product development process. This feedback helps businesses understand user requirements, identify potential issues, and improve product design and functionality.
• Quality Control : In manufacturing and service industries, data gathering procedures are used to monitor and control quality. By collecting data on processes, materials, and outputs, organizations can identify defects, improve quality, and ensure compliance with standards.
• Academic Research : Researchers in academia rely on data gathering procedures to collect empirical data for their studies. This data is essential for testing hypotheses, validating theories, and contributing to knowledge in various fields.
• Public Policy and Planning : Governments and public organizations use data gathering to inform public policy and planning. This includes collecting data on population demographics, economic conditions, health statistics, and environmental factors to develop effective policies and programs.

How do you choose a data gathering method?

Choose based on the research objective, target population, resources available, and the type of data needed.

What is qualitative data gathering?

Qualitative data gathering involves collecting non-numerical information to understand concepts, opinions, or experiences.

What is quantitative data gathering?

Quantitative data gathering involves collecting numerical data that can be measured and analyzed statistically.

How do you ensure data accuracy?

Ensure data accuracy by using reliable sources, well-designed instruments, and consistent data collection procedures.

What is a survey?

A survey is a data gathering tool that uses questionnaires to collect information from a large number of respondents.

What is an interview?

An interview is a data gathering method where one-on-one or group conversations are conducted to obtain detailed information.

What is observation in data gathering?

Observation involves systematically watching and recording behaviors or events as they occur naturally.

What is secondary data?

Secondary data is information that has already been collected and published by others for different purposes.

How do you gather secondary data?

Gather secondary data from sources like books, academic journals, government reports, and online databases.

What are the benefits of using secondary data?

Secondary data saves time and resources and provides a basis for comparison and further research.

Text prompt

• Instructive
• Professional

10 Examples of Public speaking

20 Examples of Gas lighting