how do you foresee the philippines ten years from now essay

Thursday, June 27, 2024 EXPLORE THE FUTURE

philippines predictions for 2030

Country Forecast
Philippines

Read 15 predictions about Philippines in 2030, a year that will see this country experience significant change in its politics, economics, technology, culture, and environment. It’s your future, discover what you’re in for.

Quantumrun Foresight prepared this list; A trend intelligence consulting firm that uses strategic foresight to help companies thrive from future trends in foresight . This is just one of many possible futures society may experience.

International relations predictions for Philippines in 2030

International relations predictions to impact Philippines in 2030 include:

Politics predictions for Philippines in 2030

Politics related predictions to impact Philippines in 2030 include:

Government predictions for Philippines in 2030

Government related predictions to impact Philippines in 2030 include:

Economy predictions for Philippines in 2030

Economy related predictions to impact Philippines in 2030 include:

The Philippines becomes one of the largest Southeast Asian economies this year, growing to over $1 trillion, up from $310 billion in 2015. Likelihood 60% 1
The United Nations Development Program reports that sustainable development goals have brought $82 billion in investments and 4.4 million jobs to the Philippines as of this year. Likelihood 40% 1

Technology predictions for Philippines in 2030

Technology related predictions to impact Philippines in 2030 include:

Culture predictions for Philippines in 2030

Culture related predictions to impact Philippines in 2030 include:

Defense predictions for in 2030

Defense related predictions to impact Philippines in 2030 include:

Infrastructure predictions for Philippines in 2030

Infrastructure related predictions to impact Philippines in 2030 include:

Electricity consumption grows to 173.9 terawatt hour this year, while non-hydro renewable capacity increases by 10% since 2019. Likelihood 60% 1
Renewable energy now makes up 50% of the Philippines' Luzon-Visayas power system as of this year. Likelihood 70% 1
JICA to help Philippines ease traffic congestion in Metro Manila. Link
How the Philippine grid could achieve 30%—or even 50%—renewable energy by 2030. Link
Philippines renewables to grow 11 percent by 2030. Link

Environment predictions for Philippines in 2030

Environment related predictions to impact Philippines in 2030 include:

Science predictions for Philippines in 2030

Science related predictions to impact Philippines in 2030 include:

Health predictions for Philippines in 2030

Health related predictions to impact Philippines in 2030 include:

Vitamin A deficiency rates in children significantly lowered over the past ten years. Many are linking the success to the approval of genetically modified golden rice. Likelihood 40% 1
The government's inter-agency task force on hunger is close to reaching total hunger eradication across the Philippines this year. Likelihood 40% 1
Rapid population growth leaves the Philippines a relatively young country with 70% of the population under 40 this year, despite intensifying ageing trends and negative migration. Likelihood 50% 1
After finding and treating 2.5 million people with tuberculosis, the Philippines remains committed to the promise to help eradicate the disease from the world this year. Likelihood 40% 1
GM golden rice gets landmark safety approval in the Philippines. Link
It’s time to end TB in the Philippines. Link
Philippines in 2030: The future demographic. Link
Philippines hopes to totally eradicate hunger by 2030. Link

More predictions from 2030

Read the top global predictions from 2030 - click here

Next scheduled update for this resource page

January 7, 2022. Last updated January 7, 2020.

Suggestions?

Suggest a correction to improve the content of this page.

Also, tip us about any future subject or trend you'd like us to cover.

SPECIAL SERIES

Future of work
Future of retail
Future of education
Future of human evolution
Future of law

The Society of Honor by Joe America

Policy and Terms
The Villanueva Interviews
Going Home: Salazar and Garcia

A vision of the Philippine future!!!

Posted by giancarloangulo on August 4, 2017 · 188 Comments

how do you foresee the philippines ten years from now essay

This is not your granddaughter’s Philippines [edited]

By Joe America

Let’s imagine a likely future for the Philippines. We can draw our deductions from the trends we currently see, including current events, popular will, and various government acts. I shall presume that readers are fairly well versed on social, political, and economic developments in the Philippines.

If you have questions or disagree with the projections, please make your points in the discussion that follows the article. That’s the main purpose of this blog. Remember that hopes and wishes are not exactly analytical.

To help with the discussion, I have asked my bookie Sal to attach some probabilities to various predictions. You might choose to have your own bookie or AI calculator put some estimates to them as well.

Here we go. This is what we will see in the Philippines over the next 10 or 20 years:

Representative government is on the way out in favor of a federation of dynastic states headed by a strongman. The Constitution will cease to be a document of, by, and for the people, and will be reconfigured to be of, by, and for the entitled. This mock-democracy may be representative, but, like today, representatives will look up, not down, as they craft laws and line their pockets. Sal estimates there is an 85% chance that material changes to the Constitution will be made within the next five years, and a 98% chance of it occurring within 10 years as successors to President Duterte follow in his strongman footsteps (Marcos, Pacquiao, or Duterte II).

The economy will remain robust over the short, middle, and long term as Chinese firms move in to replace Western companies that depart. Economic well-being will be bolstered by an increasing number of OFW’s, many of whom will go directly to mainland China as the Philippines continues to produce the best and brightest servant class in the world. China will come to dominate Philippine mining, construction, agribusiness, fishing, and manufacturing sectors within 20 years. Sal puts the chance of economic collapse at a mere 5%.

Brains will drain out of the country , leaving the population as a hard-working, frustrated, discouraged, vacuous lot susceptible to propaganda and emotional appeals made by a strongman leader whom they will admire, having long ago forgotten how real father figures ought to behave. A material brain drain is a 95% probability as people of high character and intellect seek opportunities in lands that can provide them. The Philippines will be bogged down in natural disasters, regional wars, ethnic conflicts (Chinese vs. Filipino), and governmental incompetence, factors that will limit career opportunities for Filipinos. As is the case in today’s government, advancement will be determined by the concessions one is willing to make to the entitled . . . not competence.

The Philippines will not rise to become a leader in Asia as internal turmoil, natural disasters, and corruption sap what little wealth, intellectual, and management authority is left behind by those fleeing. The job of leading non-Chinese Asia will fall to Japan and Viet Nam. In the Philippines, a government managed by the unskilled elite, doling out favors rather than solving problems forthrightly, will muddle along as Filipinos far and wide continue to bear their burdens obediently. Many will drop out to join Muslim or communist rebellions. Sal puts the probability of the Philippines keeping pace with Viet Nam as a nation others emulate at less than 3%.

Drugs will continue to be a ‘managed problem’ that, along with rebellion, will bolster the State’s arguments for ruthless totalitarian controls. The Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) will give in to strongman authority sooner rather than later as honorable oldies are phased out and those who get high on power are promoted. Sal puts the chance at 85% that the military, along with the police, will be ruthless arms of enforcement within the Philippines by the end of the Duterte term.

Free expressions such as this blog will be gone within five years, banned by a government that insists on one version of the truth. Journalism will cease to exist. Mass media organizations will be run by propaganda teams. Within 10 years, the internet will be controlled as China currently controls access to the internet by its citizens. The probability that citizens will be freely able to express themselves, media will be objective, and the internet will be open-access is less than 15%.

Lots of old people will reflect fondly on what it used to be like during the six years of sanity and hope provided by President Noynoy Aquino. Guaranteed. 100% probability.

Summarizing, the three main themes of the Philippine future will be:

Dynastic, authoritarian government acting as an annex to China with leaders well-compensated for their allegiances to a foreign power and money.
Independent Filipino thought and courage stripped bare as capable people leave the country and government slots are filled by obedient but incompetent opportunists who manipulate messages received by citizens.
Filipinos will be the best and brightest servant class in the world and, domestically, provide a huge, inexpensive labor base for the accumulation of wealth by the elite and China.

Unless people realize what a mistake they made in choosing leaders on emotional basis than realities and so they must switch and fight, this country will be seeing a succession of ultra-rightist strongmen relying on fundamentalist principles, sycophants, and a burgeoning state-capital empire striving to attain supremacy by 2049.

That sure seems the direction. I don’t know of emotional people suddenly going rational. I’d the best chance of stopping this trend would be to discover or create an emotionalized good leader.

> I don’t know of emotional people suddenly going rational.

If and only if the current system gets one of their relatives killed.

——- Offtopic: asides from the free (and slow) wifi on MRT, another example of “bread” in “bread and circuses”, this time to appease the militant students:

#BREAKING : President Duterte signs free tuition law for SUCs, HEI, TESDA | via @Joseph_Morong pic.twitter.com/iJGIbDOEtt — GMA Integrated News (@gmanews) August 4, 2017

I have to disagree. The free tuition bill is not a purely populist policy; the motives behind it may have been populist, but it was decent legislation that fittingly built on the incremental progress (K12, UNIFAST) already undertaken.

I mean, it’s pretty much UNIFAST + “Free Tuition” mandate. It builds on UNIFAST to allow the lower middle class (via affirming student loans as a key part of policy) and poor (via covering Other School Fees through a targeted system that priotizes the poor & making TVIs—technical vocational institutions—also free, which is something that frankly a lot of people are ignoring…which is strange because this not only makes the bill less disproportionately beneficial in favor of the middle class, but also blunts a possible oversupply of college graduates who might turn out to be baristas for lack of a job/job mismatch.

(Frankly, I see the bill as a huge pseudo-tax break for the middle and lower middle class that helps keep their economic gains—esp. the latter’—more secure. But I understand that economists have valid worries regarding its expensiveness, which is honestly the only thing that you can’t go around—in which case, I wouldn’t mind replacing the free tuition mandate with a radically expanded student loan provision, as the student loan provision is awfully generous: you pay only when you get a job whose income meets a level set by the gov’t, and you pay that through SSS/GSIS contributions, so you don’t get pinched directly.

I mean, regardless of whether one thinks the bill is a victory for social justice and a fairer society—or a fiscal cancer waiting to burst, the way the bill got in (good or ill) is a testament to the potential (and perhaps hidden strength) of PH democracy.

I’m not saying this because agree with the bill—I mean, let’s assess what has happened. A bunch of citizens (student activists, primarily on the Left) decided to use their constitutional rights to organize and lobby the state to ensure free tuition. In the beginning, it’s a fringe position. Suddenly, some politicians (i.e. Bam) see that it’s not a bad idea after all—despite not being on the same ideological (Bam Aquino’s key advocacy is small business and his other recent proposal is a venture fund for start-ups—not exactly your neighborhood socialist) wavelength. This is great. It means a policy is gradually entering the mainstream. Soon, momentum gathers until there is a general consensus that this policy should be implemented; as the bill travels the legislature, it is not uncritically accepted—our economists enter the public debate (again protected and facilitated by constitutional rights) to remind us of the big costs of this policy. The President, to his credit, takes his time and thinks carefully. Eventually, he uses the prerogative of his office to approve the bill.

Like the bill or not, this is how democracy works. You could easily apply the same process for how legislation like gay marriage legalization occurs. Of courseC there’s the chance that it may be a dud bill—but democracy isn’t perfect. However, more importantly, this is how “bipartisan work” works—whether this bill gives us a truly equitable society or this bill condemns our treasury to fiscal limbo, it’s all on us…

…which is, if you don’t mind this random person venting, what irritates me about the current “atmosphere” in social media. It frankly disgusts me that netizens all squabbling online for who gets the credit for this legislation like children. Sometimes, to the point of badmouthing good people who also supported the policy just because they happen to be from a different political faction; can’t we all be winners for once? Ugh.

Well said Francis. You make a lot of sense. My concern only is that freebies almost always churn out terrible wastage. And for any reason when the time comes for its withdrawal, you get terrible protests. I like your soft loan approach. Another option may be sharing approach. 50-50 or 30-70 or whatever ratio so long as students pick up some tab.

Chemrock I are firmly of the view that free tertiary education is crucial to the development of a humane society and culture. We did it here in Australia once for 17 years from 1972-1999.

And yes a lot of people started doing courses that were of little ‘economic value’. For example ( this was cited at the time ) housewives with kids at child care returned to study courses at uni in English and foreign languages and psychology etc..

But they were of enormous personal educational, psychological, social value. It really had a long term deepening our society’s awareness….

In 1990. our Education Minister, from the Labor Party, and a millionaire named John Dawkins, changed this to make it a deferred payment tertiary education scheme. for all courses.. And now graduates emerge from Uni with huge debts of $100,000 or more to be paid later in life.

Dawkins was so rich he had no idea what his ‘reforms’ would do. And exactly how he became the Labor party Minister for Education is beyond my understanding.

Turning this to the Philippines, from my knowledge of what happened here : I think Dutters may by pure accident have done something useful & good.

Normally, free subsidized tuition is okay as long as it’s responsibly operated, but at a time like this, when you have a demagogue for a leader and sycophants in tow, it becomes a convenient tool for which to soften his image, and that (I begrudge to give him credit or he has eminence grise) it’s perfect timing for to sign several bills into laws so as to counter criticism of his otherwise circus of a government.

Indeed, socialist policies is easily hijacked for promotion of personal interests.

BTW, the only thing left for me, short of general public discontent, is infighting among the sycophant hyenas over the carcass.

Yes, and the discovery of a punitive, satirical sense of humor.

I am still dreaming of a brighter and prosperous Philippines. Maybe…five years from now? Good morning Joeam!

Good morning, arlene. Glad you don’t let unbearable pessimism get you down. 🙂 🙂

Oh sorry, what I meant was we could still get up from this quagmire after five years when Digong is no longer around.

Yes, that’s how I read it. I hope you are right, but I have lost confidence in the judgment of the masses.

As it is now, everything is topsy-turvy. As most people ask these days, where are we going?

No. By my every breath and every bone in my body, no. This scenario will not come to pass. Duterte is a fever, not Stage 4 cancer. Early detection gives the patient 80-90% chance of survival.

Always good to have people disagree with Sal’s boneheaded calculations. 🙂

My barber and Sal have quite a history over bottles and bottles of SanMig and he objects very strongly to the characterization of “boneheaded calculation” made by his friend Sal. Sal walks the streets — the alleys of the slums to the streets around the high-end malls, and in office buildings of all manners of people, including those places TSH members wouldn’t want to be seen in — when he is not in his computer or at his favorite pub. He has a track record of putting 2 and 2 together and coming out with 4. He is a realist and an academician when it comes to his odd-making or probability assignment.

And you know what? I agree with my barber. (My barber adds: watch Sal change his mind when crucial data comes as he walks the streets. He says to give Sal at least another year for a re-assessment. I am waiting with bated breath.)

My barber gives me the tip, allegedly from his friend Sal: the one in the driver’s seat here is not anymore the PH leaders including the top honcho. They have been baited well and good; the driver here are the top guns on top of the country whose Leader plays with his missile and nuke toys. My barber speaks in geopolitical terms I sometimes don’t understand. I have to finish my second cup to think about that, but thought I should relay for what it is worth. 🙂

The barber is the one who gives you tips?

It usually comes after Sal and my barber go binging on SanMig and I come around to have a haircut — of the few hairs I have left. Otherwise I have to go thinking on my own. My barber certifies that I am ok myself.

Which brings me to this: both Sal and my barber love SanMig. I hope Ang does not go about changing the recipe and brewing of the beer. Otherwise their odd-making skills may get affected.

Sal smiled, winked, and started sobbing uncontrollably at the thought that SOMEONE understands!! That took about five minutes, and he went and got another beer.

Sal also predicted Mar to be the next President, so he might be optimistic.

His response is “I was only a month off.”

This is a good article, Joe. In insurance selling, the technique is called parking the hearse at the doorstep, or showing the consequences of not acceding to the offer, making the worst-case scenario as real as possible. (Of course, I don’t use it.) This is also a dipstick into the minds of people. Will we fold, or will we resist or mitigate the effects of the political trajectory?

Ahhhhhh, I am so transparent! (To a skilled insurance salesman.) My next article may be about humor, and I’ll lead it off with my best insurance salesman jokes.

As Chinese firms move in to replace Western Companies.

http://fortune.com/2016/03/18/the-biggest-american-companies-now-owned-by-the-chinese/

For now, I’m deer looking into headlights, Karl. Pretty soon your generation will be holding the whole kit n kaboodle.

The only thing stopping China is Japan.

http://www.mauldineconomics.com/editorial/the-leading-power-in-east-asia-will-be-japannot-china-1

Most interesting. Life’s a cycle.

That makes Crichton’s Rising Sun small in comparison.

Dang, I wish they’d buy Ford and inject some life into my stock portfolio. I downloaded a Chinese language course to see how well I can grasp the tonalities. Not too bad. When I get stuck on one particular tone, I recite “moooo” very authoritatively to get a green light and bell. Cracks my son up. He tried “f**k” on a different tone, but it didn’t work. He is obviously already fluent in Dutertese.

A fighting chance against the rampaging AI.

http://www.entrepreneur.com.ph/news-and-events/henry-sy-jr-dado-banatao-back-startup-to-help-bpos-cope-with-automation-threat-a36-20170126

It’s good to see PH oligarchs dealing with the future forthrightly. I hope their start-up has much success. Commerce is, I suppose, the great leveler, the area where poor critical thinking is deadly.

What a grim future for our country! We must act now, whatever we can do now: People Power 3!! Even Death may help us — Du30 is a sick madman! (I beg pardon for the death wish!)

You only say what many of us think, but are too timid to say.

Free expressions- If bashing and intimidation is not enough then outright banning might be the next move, but so far it has not happened yet. The trolls even say that if free speech is removed then they could not have been commenting anything anti-Duterte. True for now.

It all depends on what we read into the new ownership of the Inquirer, and how that affects fact-based reporting. And what reading we attach to the harassment of Maria Ressa.

I did delete my disqus account last week, Unusual moderation lately in Inquirer even from comment without dirty words etc. Maybe paranoid but my feeling told me delete it now before the ”new owner get the email addresses from the commenters.

Prudent is always prudent. I’ve developed a twitch thinking about all the places my footprints are spread across the internet.

If Ramon Ang puts Mocha Uson and the Tulfo brothers in the higher ups of Inquirer and buys out the shares of Manny Pangilinan then we are screwed.

Sal is taking overs and unders at 6 months before Pangilinan is out.

It maybe sooner, if the price is right.

http://www.philstar.com/business/2017/07/19/1720814/mvp-open-sale-pdi-stake-acceptable-price

Even faster. Damn!

http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2017/08/05/1725199/mvp-agrees-sell-15-percent-stake-inquirer

Noted. Thanks for the update.

******* Should not the caption say, “This is not your granddaughter’s Philippines”? *****

Ahhh, even better. I’ll make that change.

I do not share Sal’s confidence of the economy.

In the short term the economy may still ride on the steam provided by the previous admin but it will sputter by end 2018. The signs are all out there. So far the admin has not made any structural changes to make the country more competitive. The leadership is in the snake pit clawing at each other for personal reasons on a daily basis.

Chinese companies will surely come, but they won’t have it easy. They will be here for the extraction and food business only. For the mining business I think they will bear the brunt of increased NPA violence. For agribusiness, Philippines archaic land laws make impossible capital intensive large scale farming, the kind that the Chinese favour.

Manufacturers always seek a cheaper base of production. So yes their labour cost in the cities has indeed gone up, but remember there are still billions of Chinese in the provinces where labour is still cheap. Some Chinese manufacturers might come to Philippines for the low labour. Chinese products manufactured in Philippines become ‘made-in-Philippines’ products for which there are implications. As Philippines move politically closer to China, GSPs of Western countries will be withdrawn. It won’t be easy marketing to the rest of the world.

In economic management, I observe that Philippines’ economic czars have always relied on OFW remittances and government spending as the two key fronts to growth forecast. OFW provides the fundings for a whole mass of the population to spend domestically, and government expenditure provides for employment and salaries to spend in the mall. The OFW remittances the govt cannot control. It is subject to the vagaries of currency volatility and the external economies. (Well there is one way the govt can increase influence — it controls the push factor. Make the country more screwed up, more will leave to find jobs overseas). Govt spending they can control. The lazy way to make GDP figures look good — increase budget allocation, never mind even if it goes into deficits. Build build build, never mind the country goes into debt. For as long as economic planning is heavily influenced by these, the country will never see light of day. This is an expenditure-based thinking towards GDP, instead of production.

Thanks for this needed probing of the economic projection. I think the offset is that China recognizes just what a grand coup the Philippines would be in their march outward, and they’d be willing to underwrite assured success for their soft annexation. It was recently reported that China is considering allowing the importation of domestic helpers. I suspect that is specifically being done to favor the Philippines.

This has already started, Joe. Chinoy friends visiting in town say Chinoys are being outbidded by mainland Chinese middle class over needed Filipino DHs.

Ahh, thanks for update.

Chinese families have all the while favoured domestic helpers from the Philippines, not for love of helping the country, but because they value the opportunity for their kids to learn English.

I did suspect the English motive, chempo. Thanks for confirming.

They will end up learning that salvage = to kill instead of salvage = to save. LOL

🙂 Yes, most likely unless reasonable oversight on the part of agencies is exercised.

Nice insights chem,

If things gets politically and economically bad, do you foresee a Venezuela-like situation for the Philippines?

The banana republic awaits any country that does’nt correct its economy when it goes into a free fall. Many countries reached the brink, peered over it, and got their senses back, making lots of sacrifices to do things right, including stringing corrupt leaders in the gallows. I see lots of Filipinos still do not believe there is a brink, unwilling to make sacrifices (by which I mean accepting salvation by delayed gratification (the economic pill offered by Pnoy), and a blind acceptance of a leadership that is offering nothing of economic sense at the moment.

The economic plight of the Philippines will be reflected in 3 key metrics — the exchange rate, the current accounts balance, and the central bank foreign reserves. One year under Dut, all 3 metrics are headed in the wrong direction. An erratic leadership with flip-flopping policies, no clear economic direction, and horrible human rights reputation is sending all the wrong signals that can only result in emplifying the trade imbalance. The damage will be felt in the weakening exchange rate. Part 1 of the tax reform and a weakened exchange rate is going to rouse the sleeping killer – inflation, which has been well managed under Tetangco in the past decade. In order to control inflation and protect the peso, the central bank has two options — increase interest rates or intervene in the currency market. Increasing interest rates will dampen the economy, so in the short term, it will most likely intervene in forex market. To intervene in the forex market it tends to loose heavily in it’s foreign exchange reserves. In just one year, this admin has lost almost 6% of its forex reserves. It is raiding the reserves each time the president curses at somebody.

The admin has said the total infra is $9 trillion but it will be funded 80% domestically and 20% foreign loans. That means $1.8 trillion foreign loans. Pnoy handed over an external loan of $74.5 billion so this admin will increase it to $2.55 Trillion, a whopping increase of 241%. Question is can the Philippines economy sustain this level of external debt? The economic planners want to follow all the countries in the world that has gone on a credit spree taking advantage of a zero percent interest regime for the last decade or more. I think they may have missed the low interest boat. All indications are, interest rates are moving up again. The repercussions on a $2.55 Trillion external debt is horrendous. Every increase by 1% increases debt servicing by $25.5 billion. Consider this — Philippines budget in 2017 was 3.35 trillion pesos, @ 50 = $ 67 billion. Just 1% increase in interest will suck up 17% of the entire budget. Is that sustainable? One think is for sure. Debt servicing will severely strain the peso exchange rate and central bank reserves in the years to come.

I can’t say if it will be a Venezuela scenario, but the economic trajectory of Philippines is not comforting for sure.

Velenzuela’s problem was due to Chavez overselling on his socialist policies. Don’t get me wrong, a bit of socialism is always required. When a society prospers, it must always have a safety net for those left behind. But when the objective of socialist policies was to bolster political populism and to remain in power, it is grave mis-use of the state coffer. All the wealth from oil was mis-used. Duterte has’nt got to that destructive level yet. But that is because he has’nt got so much state funds. Let’s assume the joint venture projects take off and money flows in, that’s when the test will be on Dut. Will he go the same socialist way to remain in power. So far he has shown a willingness to take the soft option of socialist policies to diffuse political tensions re — the SSS increased payout, Kadamay occupation of govt housing. Police and AFP doubling of salaries still to be realised.

Because he thought he had oil, Chavez went on a borrowing spree for infras and socialist objectives. His demise came about when the price of oil plummeted, the rug was pulled from under his feet. So that begs the question. Why do the economic planners of the Dut admin make such audacious plans – a $2.55 trillion external debt? Was there a knowledge that Philippines state coffers will flow from the richness of the West Philippines Seas vis-a-vis joint venture with China? Are we to buy into the conspiracy theory of Arroyo-China involvement long before the election? That what’s happening is a fait accompli?

Under Chavez, Venezuela took on so much Chinese debt. When they could not repay, they were forced to buy Chinese products . . in exchange for the oil. They ended up having so much Chinese refrigerators that the govt sold them off at huge discounts that came to be known as the ‘Chavez discount’. Today, every Venezuelian owns a Chinese refridgerator, but there’s no food inside. I don’t know if we will have a Dut’s discount scheme any time soon.

Thanks, chemrock. Even a non-economist like me understands that. The post complements the current blog very nicely.

I read that NEDA’s Pernia has the following vetting or filter mechanism on the Chinese companies to undertake the infras here: Ask the Chinese Authorities to give a list of three companies which passes its (Chinese) filter; then Pernia et all will vet the three and choose one. Methinks that seems sound if we can trust China 100% the way we trusted China on its behavior regarding our Scarborough Shoal. (Last line — tongue in cheek.)

Pernia’s comment totally lacked enthusiasm, almost as if he were resigned to following orders. “It is the best we can do”, he said.

I gained respect for NEDA under President Aquino because they were data oriented, and candid in their interpretation. When the Admin fell behind its poverty reduction targets, this was noted, and effort was redoubled. I noticed that this NEDA group does tend to play politics more and it is worrying.

Chemrock, could you tap a few keys and make this comment a blog? Don’t add anything. Or at least let me post the comment to my Facebook page. It is a most provocative and informative read.

Go ahead with your FB share. Just edit the sentence in the last paragraph

“”When they could not repay, they were forced to buy Chinese products….in exchange for the oil”

Will do. Thanks.

Thanks. It’s getting good reads and comments: https://www.facebook.com/joe.america.7771/posts/662213667308972

Chemrock, you are spot on ! To me It has the smell of Argentina in 2000-2001. Similar strategy and similar results.

But you did not mention that as the ‘course’ becomes obvious, anyone with money will try to get it out of the Philippines into foreign bank accounts or change pesos into cash dollars ‘under the bed’. And that of course quickens the process as it is self reinforcing

Yes Bill, you are absolutely right. The moneyed class understands the situation very well and they know when to run. Capital flight starts with a trickle, initially with hot money, that is foreign investors in the equities market, and then into an uncontrollable mad rush through the revolving door. Most of the hot money has already left the PSEI within one year of Dut. Of course Abella will interpret it as due to external factor — FED increase of interest rate. That certainly played a role but it is definitely accentuated by the chaos of in the country. Financial panic is contagious and the only way to stop it is state intervention of capital controls. The very fear of capital control itself feeds the velocity of capital flight.

I bet for sure amongst the moneyed class, contingency plans have already been made. They do not get to where they are without such foresights on monetary matters.

Capital flight like in Venezuela except that Chavez imposed a quota that hurt production and supplynof non-oil commodities.

I thought you would agree Chemrock. I see it already as a year ago I could only get 34-35 pesos for a dollar. But a week ago we sent some pesos to family and the A $ bought 39 pesos. That is a depreciation of 16% in a year. I imagine something similar has happened via a vis the US dollar.

A year ago I was wondering whether to invest some of my retirement in Filipino government bonds which were offering an attractive rate (6% ) compared to here ( 2.5%) . I didn’t. And now I am glad I did not..

By the way Chemrock, Argentina in 2000-2001 was definitely very bad for all the less wealthy locals. Massive unemployment and a very devalued Argentine peso. Politically it was also very bad : three presidents in a matter of months due to the mass revolt against the establishment.

Bill, glad you brought this up. For the past few years the low yen interest rates (still hovering around zero) and the high A$ rates (has gone down to 2.5% you mentioned) was a fantastic money making opportunity for those with good appetite for the risk. The JPY/AUD pair saw a fantastic volume of FX swaps — borrowing in yen, convert to A$, and investing in A$ time deposits. Now the yen is still very low and peso is about 6%, a great FX swap opportunity exists, now why are’nt people interest in JPY/PHP fx swaps? The answer is no confidence. The credit ratings may still be there, World Bank and some other banks may still have a relatively good outlook for Philippines over the next year, the admin may talk of golden age of infras… but the market is’nt biting.

Chemrock, our Reserve Bank was utterly stupid & incompetent back then in 20012-2015 with those high interest rates. The board was stacked with “finance friendly” idiots. They should have been sacked the whole lot of them. In fact shooting them would have been worthwhile.

It lead to a massively over valued A $ and cheap foreign holidays for the well off. It also caused massive job ‘exporting’ as it was so cheap to import everything.

A Pixar short, titled “Lifted”, would be a better analogy IMHO, chemp…

Thanks for the insights and I agree, how the debt is headed isn’t too comforting. It may come to the point that OFW money won’t keep the economy afloat.

Now that is interesting Miela. It could go either way. Three things will come to play. 1 If the pesos drops a lot then OFW wages in dollars or other foreign money will become more valuable. So buying property in the Philippines will be less expensive.

2 On the other hand OFW’s will probably also choose to keep more of their savings overseas in case things go bad with the peso.. And that means the flow dries up.

3 But in the midst of this is the simple fact that many OFW’s are supporting family at home and so locked into sending money to them. But I think many will in future bring cash dollars with them when coming home, rather than transfering pesos via Western Union etc.

What actually happens in the macro level will be a result of each OFW’ making their own financial decisions.

Make the country more screwed up so that people will leave and find work abroad, thus more remittances. More money to spend for consuming of the dependents with no age limits. Some use the remittance money wisely, so e don’t. I doubt it reaches the treasury because VAT collctions always has shortfalls due to exemptions. The spenders are the senior citizens most of their expenses like food,pharmaceuticals are vat exempt. The other bulk of the remittances go the underground economy, again underground means no tax payments.

The other money maker is the BPO, AI is a major threat. Brazil and Argentina may not speak english, but Spanish and Portuguese speaking Americans and Europeans are their market. Mexico has deportees who ate well versed in American English.

For agribusinesswe tried to lease ten percent of our agri land to the Chineses, nothing happened. We also offered land to the Arabs, presumably for agribusiness as well.

Speaking of agribusiness, that is what we offer to the Russians.

This sector must be our way to success, if we play our cards right, otherwise we keep on exporting our human capital, speaking of which, how do you get the young people get interested in agri business. Right now we are still still with the trader and the middleman making the poor farmer even poorer.That must change.

“…speaking of which, how do you get the young people get interested in agri business.”

We need to change the societal perception of farming and farmers. The song “Magtanim ay di biro” is a whiny song about how hard and miserable it is plant a field. Kids are told to “Go home and plant camote” to ridicule them if they are not doing well in school. As a society, we look down our noses at farming and farmers.

I remember telling my niece that we bought some land and we were planning to be hobby farmers. She asked if we fell on hard times, if we were poor that we have to do farming to get by. It did not hit me till then that a lot of Filipinos were raised in an environment that is often disrespectful to those who steward the land and produce food for others.

It is absurd to think that farmers are at the bottom of the totem pole anywhere in the world. We need to tell young Filipinos that the world’s perception of farmers has evolved. For example, there is a strong “Back to the Land” movement in the US. Americans want to be good land stewards, eat organic and fresh produce, raise hormone and antibiotic free livestocks, lessen their carbon footprints, breathe fresh country air, chuck the chichi gym membership and much more. The new American farmers are festooned with graduate and post graduate degrees. They have done well in the corporate world and view farming as a “do good and feel good” undertaking. There is nothing lowly about farming. It is all about the communion with nature, taking care of Mother Earth and providing wholesome and healthy food to one’s family and community.

Thanks so much Juana for sharing your experience, knowledge and perception about farming.

Likewise, JP. My late father-in-law’s vertical order of priorities: God-Country-Family. His profession: Soldier-Farmer. He was one of the pioneer Advanced graduates of UP-ROTC, Los Banos. He was hunted then executed for ambushing a 2-armor convoy of Japanese top-brass.

Parking the hearse, as Will said. Or The Ghost of Christmas Future.

Unfortunately, the country may react like a stranded Filipina who a helpful diplomat threw out in exasperation.

Told she might end up in prostitution if she continued that way. She looked as if she were being offered a great opportunity..

People who laugh about two Ds masturbating may well be that stupid..

I am still curious: did they do it each for himself or did they take turns helping each other? Just evaluating their teamwork..

Heh heh. Sal is trying to figure out how to convert that to a betting book.

Ireneo, this reminded me of Scaramucci’s recent quote,

yeah sure physically impossible maybe, but sums things up perfectly! LOL!

It depends on the base: if death is one that she valued the least, that offer was certainly better.

Woe unto the country that thinks this way.

Abella may explain it this way – Well you know the president is a lawyer so he is acquainted with the word you use. Masturbation is self-gratifying. To gratify yourself, of course you need to do it yourself. But of course the president being the president, he has great wisdom. Why not kill two birds with one stone. Satisfy yourself and satisfy someone else at the same time. That’s creative thinking and multi-tasking. Now you know why the president gets very tired and need time off occasionally. As to the technique for obtaining or giving satisfaction, in other words, who does what, he did’nt address that. I’m not saying they did’nt undress, don’t mis-interpret me. But as you know, in Philippines, the poor suck up to the rich, and we know one of the D came from a very rich family. Again, don’t mis-quote me.

“Satisfy yourself and satisfy someone else at the same time. “

chemp, in the military we call this a Circle Jerk. But I think , what you and Ireneo are getting is the Human Centipede, only gratifying for the first guy, or gal. LOL!

I sit month after month with great dismay seeing that there is no organized objection to the direction of the nation. There are strong and courageous individual voices like those of Senator Hontiveros, but no organization. So I hear Will speaking from the heart, but don’t see any brains (or conviction) behind the hope.

A federal system in the Philippines might just end the existence of the republic. Imagine Ilocos where there are strong Marcos support — if the federal government will start to do its job properly by taking back what the Marcoses have stolen, the Marcoses and its allies, if they win a lot of seats, can pull something like what the Confederation did, the justification of “state rights” and the denial of “intrusion on state affairs” by the federal government. Then there’s the Cordilleras are and is still being pushed over by non-Cordillerans can get fed up and go all-out for secession. After all, they didn’t ask to join the republic. Aguinaldo just assumed they were “integral” part of Philippine territory. Many of the original inhabitants of Baguio lost their land because of the intrusion and lack of consideration for native land practices by the national government. Then, there’s the Moro issue, and the Lumads who still fight the Visayan and Luzon settlers who have displaced them.

Filipinos do not vote for who is competent or who even has the best platform — they vote either by who is most popular or by ethnicity. Marcos won Ilocos because he is Ilocano. Binay won Cagayan Valley because he is from the region. Duterte won in Vis-Min because he is of Cebuano ethnicity and resided in Mindanao for a long time. Grace Poe won Pangasinan becayse FPJ is originally from Pangasinan.

If I may ad, I remember at the height of the anti-Arroyo protests, Duterte and some Visayan officials “threatened” to secede in Arroyo was ousted from office. Secession is not far-fetched esp if the dynastic and alliances are disturbed.

Yes, I think a dividing of the Philippines geographically is a real possibility, with the South aligned with Muslim Malaysia, the North to China, and the Visayas to Bill Gates heh heh. (I don’t know where the Visayas would go.)

These configurations seem to suggest the paradigms set by the Meiji Restoration and/or the Barons, King John and the Magna Carta looking better n better, Miela. At least the territorial confines of PH (and more) were already drawn by the first two colonizers (Spain, America). Now it’s the turn of PH, the third colonizer. No other to blame. Else over the cliff we go.

In the recent spat between Cong Farinas and Imee the Illocos Norte Board declared Farinas persona non gratia. Under what basis and authority I don’t know. In a federalism, there will be thousands of issuance of persona non gratias. In fact, I think the drug war will be superseded by a persona non gratia war. Mark my word, I said it first.

There is one aspect you have not included in this picture Joe : BPO…. Is this sector still increasing in numbers and in income earned ? Last time I looked it was.

The interesting thing about the BPO is that it connects a substantial part of the resident working population directly with other more prosperous countries and does so directly with ordinary people in those countries and via thir language – English.

In other words BPO sector is a major income earner and a direct connector into the minds, attitudes and culture of English speaking countries… China’s Communist Party dictatorship in part ‘works’ because Chinese, while it is spoken by many people, is not an international language spoken in many countries.. Thus the Chinese people in China can be dominated ‘informationally’ and intellectually by the PRC government and it’s minions.

I do not think that will happen in the Philippines. The English speaking ( & English understanding ) parts of the population are too big as percentages of the population.

So isolation will not happen.

And dominance long term cannot be achieved.

This was mentioned by JamesB the other day.

http://www.sunstar.com.ph/cebu/local-news/2017/06/29/cebu-city-loses-spot-among-top-bpo-sites-550112

Just nerds. forecasting how great more nerdising will be Karl.

When we have a phone issue we want to talk to humans..But the nerds always thing their computers will be better. Well I say “Fuck them ! “

I’ve always said that the BPO industry in general (with or w/out Trump; with or w/out other 3rd world competition, ie. AI) is expendable.

I hope this downturn in Cebu isn’t because of BPO companies leaving but because BPO kids in Cebu smartened up early on and started pealing off BPO companies either to run their own outfits and/or take the enterpreneurial call (or work for smaller companies locally owned), ie. starting their own businesses, that’s what tends to happen in Silicon Valley, talented folks leave bigger companies to start or join smaller companies in a new niche.

If this isn’t what happened probably best to get it started regardless.

Hey Lance, there was no “downturn’. Employment is increasing. But the company that issues and the press release, changed how it scored the top 10 cities. It included other new factors..

It’s there if you read the link from Karl. And what’s interesting is that the other countries that have moved up the ratings into the top 10 list – In Brazil & Argentina, don’t speak English.

Duhhhhhhh ????

Jus mre “Lies, damned lies and Statistics” !

Ahhh… thanks, I read the link title, and thought down turn (these Filipino links don’t open for me too well). This sounds like a conspiracy, so who then is fixing the numbers or adjusting factors? Or is English as a factor before not really so important any longer? ie. more IT type BPO? so, still maybe a sign of things to come?

All I know is that 10 weeks in BA’s demonstrated to me that English is NOT spoken there by many people….Brazil I do not know…. But both places are in major depressions economically. So maybe the company doing the ratings, is doing these countries a ‘favor’.

BPO as an industry is dependent on good knowledge of English and it’s subtlties…The Philippines is leap years ahead in this..

Argentina = Spanglish Brazil = Portuglish

In the Philippines we have Taglish, but some Filipino BPO’s conversational English can give Bill and Joe a run for their money, complete with accent.

Well, Bill talks funny.

I’ve had some interesting conversations with Filipino BPO employees…Apart from sorting the issue at hand.

An example of Chinese attempts to control everything

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-04/chinese-chatbots-deleted-after-questioning-communist-party/8773766

Had a laugh after reading it.

Bill: the English speaking population is large. Those who really understand English – fewer. Adjusting to the next set of masters not harder than adjusting to Saudi, Dubai, HK – you just tell them what they want to hear, like with USA.

Irineio I had some weird experiences last year with this.. Talking with my lady about an issue in English with other Filipinos listening and not speaking English at all., just Tagalog..But understanding my English very adaquately…It was embarressing for me a couple for times.

And the Saudis etc… all use English for their OFW’s

Bill, if and when Philippines is ‘colonised’ by PRC as this blog suggests, won’t it be a logical proposition that the govt of the day will veered the educational curriculum towards a Chinese-based one? It’s not too far-fetch I think.

Ummmmm… That may be attempted Chemrock..But that is what the Afrikaner government of South Africa did in the 197’s with it’s education policies for blacks. It tried to replace English with Afrikaans in schools..For the same reasons

Result ? Major revolts in the schools and universities. It fueled the ANC. And the ANC won.

Meanwhile there is the Filipino ‘dispora’ (NOT the OFW’s ) in mostly English speaking countries all around the world – the USA, Canada, UK ,Australia, Singapore, New Zealand.

A dispora with money and families still in the Philippines.

Sorry, off topic but a good reminder. This is democracy and British parliamentary system for you. In the wild wild west of Pakistan, even a dictator can be subdued by the Supreme Court. Prime Minister Nawaz Shariff has been disqualified by the Supreme Court for his involvement in the Panama Papers. Take the Ejercito, et tu Imee.

https://www.publicintegrity.org/2017/08/01/21039/pakistani-pm-disqualified-court-over-panama-papers-links?utm_source=email&utm_campaign=watchdog&utm_medium=publici-email&utm_source=Watchdog&utm_campaign=2198af77c5-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_06_11&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_ffd1d0160d-2198af77c5-102645513&mc_cid=2198af77c5&mc_eid=7fd2d056f8

Exactly Chemrock !

Chemrock and Bill. Have you read my comment in the previous piece/thread about the Philippine Legal Olympus? To be clueless or to appear to be one precludes not knowing one is trying to make history.

Popoy I long ago came to the conclusion that the Philippines is not a country with a legal system. Rather it is a country with elected mayors, governors and an elected Emperor. as in ancient Rome. .And the Emperor is boss until he is not the boss. I guess being elected is an improvement on becoming emperor by killing the last one or fighting and winning against other ‘candidates’ in a civil war. But that’s what Dutters is : ‘God Emperor of The Philippines”. With Apologies to Frank Herbert who wrote the wonderful Science fiction books about Dune

Maybe that is why he and Yi Xing Peng “God Emperor of China, get on so well.

It is. IT IS Bill a country with a legal system. You could have a contempt of court problem with any Court of (In)Justice if you insist and not prove it. With a few alleged US soldiers felony, the US State Department and the US Military has to reckon with its sticky system.

Yes Popoy, today’s Zeus sits on a slippery slope.

Almost certainly correct.

Some friends think that the USA or even Japan will intervene to save the Philippines; I tell them that the USA under Trump is dysfunctional and could not organise any overseas intervention, covert or overt, and Japan is barred by the Constitution.

The detail that you were too tasteful to mention is the mass export of Filipinas as prostitutes to China to “service” the sex ratio imbalance in the Chinese population. This will contribute notably to OFW remittances.

Ah, yes. The seamy side issues.

Caught my eye: Trump is already a lameduck president. He doesn’t care.

20 years from now… The 2 economic pillars of the Philippines will be gone. The BPO will be overtaken by AI. The OFW’s by self-sailing ships, cleaning robots, elderly helping elderly with the help of robots… Farming jobs no more sexy for the current and coming generations, farming will be taken over by largely automated bio-industry consortiums.

The inequality will be enormous. (By the way the eldest daughter of our gardener, 16 years old, is expecting her second child.) Even the current growth will not offset the population explosion in the lowest income class. The rich will export their wealth even faster than today. The competition in the middle class for the remaining jobs will have a negative effect on their salaries. NPA and ISIS affiliates getting stronger as a result of this inequality?

China only interested in the strategic value of the Philippines. More Chinese military bases with more “job” opportunities for the 16 to 25 year old female population around those bases?

And tomorrow the sun might shine again and then I will have to rewrite this contribution….

The AI take over might even be as short as within 5 years. Latest news is, Facebooks AI chatbot made its own language to the frustration of the programmers.

Don’t. We need to be candid.

******* 1. There are specific projections in certain specific areas – government structure, economy, employment, freedom, immigration, AI, language, and so on. All well and good.

2. I would like to add two areas: demography and culture.

3. Demographically speaking, I think the country will continue to be burdened by the high ratio of the poor. Currently, the D and E classes comprise 90% of families. If this ratio is maintained and not curbed, the weight of the poor will continue to drag down the country, not only economically but socially as well. The masa will continue to decide elections and the dynastic demagogues will still rule.

4. If the demography is hard to change, even harder still is the culture. We have assigned so many names to our damaged culture. I shall lump all of these together and call it the Me-First Culture, wherein amoral familism and clannism predominate.

5. So my prediction is that in 15 – 20 years’ time we may have a bubbling economy, greater and newer infrastructure, but it will be more of the same political, social, and moral chaos that we have now. As it was before, as it is now, so it will be in the near future.

5.1. The combined terms of the corrupt Marcos, Estrada, Arroyo, and Duterte will span a total of 39 years (by 2022). Compared to the relatively incorrupt 18 years of Cory, Ramos, and PNoy, the ratio of the years is 2:1. Given the demography and the culture. It is highly likely that we will have a redux of corrupt authoritarian regimes.

6. A grim future can be avoided. A pragmatic leader like Lee Kuan Yew may come along… or a group of foresighted leaders that can engineer something close to the Meiji Restoration. *****

Point 3 is actually factored in to the prognosis, but not specified. It is the labor base for China and servant base for the world and pliable base for manipulation by the strongman. Same with point 4, the lack of impetus to change. Which is why what currently exists can be projected forward. I mean, if the current goings on are acceptable to the masses, there is no opposing force, really.

Point 5, agree. And 6, although I tend to think a pragmatic leader with the kind of showmanship needed for popular acclaim is unlikely to appear. He or she also has to be willing to lead what would be termed a ‘rebellion’, and that is not healthy.

Edgar, you forget that Japan had it stuff ups on the way to it’s present prosperity – including World War 2. And even the foresighted leaders of the meiji restoration had to fight a civil war with the old timers…

And Lee Kuan Yew was ruthless in putting down those who attempted to damage his modernising revolution in the 1950’s, 60’s and 70’s.

In one of those moments of extreme defeatism, I wrote earlier in TSH something that I wish to repeat here because it seems appropriate:

The culture or Filipino character is such that we are trapped and consequently have evolved into the current state, and that we are in a scheduled trajectory of more such evolution into perdition (with the caveat, of course, that there are those who will greatly profit materially from the situation at the expense of the many, including of course the kingdom from the North.)

Is the evolution still REVERSIBLE? (I know we have enumerated the means in many previous blogs, but we may be fast losing the confidence that the means is workable.)

There is a mathematical analog to the situation. There are some problems where the “boundary conditions” — cultural or character flaw in this case — are such that no solution is possible. I hope we are not in such situation, notwithstanding my defeatist attitude.

Actually, this article was written because I have lost confidence because people don’t even recognize there is a huge and threatening problem, so how will they ever find a solution amidst all the bs thrown at them? Thanks for the term ‘boundary conditions’ to define the walls of the trap.

Calling the PH’s state of affairs as Captain Kirk’s dilemma always begs for his solution: define the horns? Absolutely; but ALWAYS look for the excluded third.

******* I believe human boundary conditions, unlike mathematical ones, can be changed. Culture is malleable.

In the case of Singapore, LKY was able to transform society by convincing people to merge their base ethnic identities – Malay, Chinese, and Indian — into a greater Singaporean identity. He attended to the main pillars of society — security, economy, and resources — but also raised the civic consciousness of the people.

Basically, he reconditioned the people’s mindset through different methods including carrot-and-stick techniques. Consider his language policy. Consider his policy of population control through sterilization, education prioritization, and economic rebates. Consider his judicial corporal punishment through caning. Consider his famous chewing gum campaign.

In the case of Japan, reconditioning was not necessary, only redirection. The Japanese were already an obedient, loyal, and honorable people, a product of the feudal and caste system, of internal strife, and of the Bushido Code. It was, therefore, a matter of redirecting their loyalties away from the local daimyos and the shogun toward the Emperor.

As Bill has rightly pointed out, the excesses of the redirection and of the nationalistic fervor resulted in the expansionist aggressive wars against China and the Allied Powers in WWII.

In the movie “The Little House (2014)” — directed by Yoji Yamada, the same director of “The Hidden Blade (2004)” — there are scenes that capture the campaigns to raise the nationalistic fervor. One of the campaigns was to ask the citizens to self-sacrifice by donating jewelry and scrap metal.

In Korea in the late 1990’s, there was a similar request by the government for the citizens to donate their gold jewelry to help the country out of its economic crisis. There was an overwhelming response.

These campaigns for donations, for cleanliness, for economic discipline are instrumental in lifting civic consciousness. Marcos stole a leaf from LKY’s book by initiating some of these campaigns. Stole. In the end, Marcos’s internal corruption surfaced as lupus and doomed his attempts.

Duterte has his anti-smoking law but, like Marcos, he does not possess personal integrity. His uncouthness pervades and permeates, and the youth of today will carry his stink 15 – 20 years from now. *****

Enlightening Edgar.

My “pangpalubag loob” or “consuelo de bobo” — the latter, transliterated: consolation to an idiot — to what is happening in the PH is to read or watch CNN news about Trump making his non-ending rant and boy am I relieved. Temporarily of course, because I know that in the end, going by some probability assessment, the institution there will most likely put a check on Trump somehow, and not let all go to the dogs. What a pity though, that even in the US things go South before something corrective happens.

At least in the US, we can laugh at the material put out by comedians who manage to inject humility in the discussion by being so outrageous. The PH does not have that kind of ‘re-calibration by ridicule’.

******* Not only comedians but also independent prosecutors. *****

Right, those, too.

Newsweek is a mainstream, maybe slightly left tilt, popular news magazine.

The motivational hierachy of the trump brand applying psychographics and Hofstede’s cultural characteristics.

Market segmentation meets personality politics complete with cult leader. Narcissism and co-dependency doing a tango, which will end with blood on the dance-floor.

http://www.garrisongroup.eu/2016/02/23/trump-brand/

One cuckoo flew into the white house.

Anyone who wants to understand trump only needs to understand malignant narcissism.

Sam vaknin is my favoured expert on Narcissistic Personality Disorder. (SV has NPD so speaks from experience)

An article he wrote about trump in 2016

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/03/donald_trump_and_narcissistic_personality_disorder_an_interview_with_sam_vaknin.html

What I’d like to know about is the personality disorder of the 26% of all Americans who are proud of Trump as president.

The President here is more content with long naps.

As an old man I accept sometimes I behave to know it all, with little knowledge like I want to appear to be a complete sage

but I err on the side of exaggerated PRAISE I hate me self to make mistake On criticisms many busy body seems to make So for JoeAm in this his above piece I post the poem below not really remembering Reading it in Grade Four in 1948 What its message is. I care not what the heck If some thinks it is an exaggerated praise.

The Man with a Hoe by Edwin Markham

Bowed by the weight of centuries he leans Upon his hoe and gazes on the ground, The emptiness of ages in his face, And on his back, the burden of the world. Who made him dead to rapture and despair, A thing that grieves not and that never hopes, Stolid and stunned, a brother to the ox? Who loosened and let down this brutal jaw? Whose was the hand that slanted back this brow? Whose breath blew out the light within this brain?

Is this the Thing the Lord God made and gave To have dominion over sea and land; To trace the stars and search the heavens for power; To feel the passion of Eternity? Is this the dream He dreamed who shaped the suns And marked their ways upon the ancient deep? Down all the caverns of Hell to their last gulf There is no shape more terrible than this– More tongued with cries against the world’s blind greed– More filled with signs and portents for the soul– More packed with danger to the universe.

What gulfs between him and the seraphim! Slave of the wheel of labor, what to him Are Plato and the swing of the Pleiades? What the long reaches of the peaks of song, The rift of dawn, the reddening of the rose? Through this dread shape the suffering ages look; Time’s tragedy is in that aching stoop; Through this dread shape humanity betrayed, Plundered, profaned and disinherited, Cries protest to the Powers that made the world, A protest that is also prophecy.

O masters, lords and rulers in all lands, Is this the handiwork you give to God, This monstrous thing distorted and soul-quenched? How will you ever straighten up this shape; Touch it again with immortality; Give back the upward looking and the light; Rebuild in it the music and the dream; Make right the immemorial infamies, Perfidious wrongs, immedicable woes?

O masters, lords and rulers in all lands, How will the future reckon with this Man? How answer his brute question in that hour When whirlwinds of rebellion shake all shores? How will it be with kingdoms and with kings– With those who shaped him to the thing he is– When this dumb Terror shall rise to judge the world, After the silence of the centuries?

We must study the transport system of Toronto. They are debating which is better BRT or LRT. In Cebu, there is a power struggle going on between the Mayor and the one assigned to Visayas by the president, concerning BRT vs LRT. In EDSA, many are against BRT.

https://beta.theglobeandmail.com/news/torontos-grand-transit-plan-maybehopefully/article29194407/?ref=https://www.theglobeandmail.com&

20 years from now… So you belief that the antichrist remains on his island in the red sea and Gog and Magog will stay locked up behind their iron curtain somewhere hidden in Asia? That’s not what ISIS teaches.

In this hyper-communicative world where facts and reason are getting irrelevant, new beliefs can propagate very fast. And religious eschatological views are sexy, scary and an easy sell. Marawi might just be a beginning. No link to economic situation, historic suppression, federalism or whatever reasonable reason, but plain and simple distorted religious beliefs.

The end time for our generation. A belief shared by many (extreme?) evangelicals and muslims, the signs as predicted in the Bible and Koran are there…

There are certainly other futures. In my projection, I presume that federalism will establish a moderate barrier to ISIS fanaticism as we see with the MNLF being incorporated as an arm of the Duterte drug war and war against terrorism. Will there be conflicts? Have there ever not been? If the end is coming, my guess it is more likely in the form of natural disasters or a nuclear storm, not ISIS brigands and other extremists. But I’m placing no money behind my projections.

The whole world now knows what tarantado and buang mean.

http://www.msn.com/en-ph/news/national/duterte-calls-north-korea%E2%80%99s-kim-jong-un-%E2%80%98tarantado-buang%E2%80%99/ar-AApifJ0?li=BBr8RiR

Look who is talking.

Oh my, Duterte thinks this is just a game of chicken. He does not want to go to war with China, yet he is brave enough to irritate North Korea.

The future is already largely determined by the level of intellect (IQ), type of character (myers-briggs), and degree of openness (big 5) of the current generation.

They combine to give a broad estimate of the future value of the human/intellectual capital.

Comparisons between different countries of IQ bell curve/median, myers-briggs distribution of personality types, and a correlation with socio-economic well-being adds a perspective to other traditional inputs.

In terms of the US election myers-briggs plus ‘the big 5″, was used as the basis of profiling by cambridge analytica which surveyed more than 150,000 households across the US – a company which steve bannon invested heavily in, and sat on the board. This then formed the basis of their targetted campaign carried out by ??.

I would expect trump’s hardcore support came from the SJ group, especially ESFJ and ISFJ. Respects authority, likes unity/collectivity, traditional/resistant to change, seeks order, people pleasers, distrust outsiders, not open to new ideas, needy, wants purpose and to belong.

Protectors (SJ) ESTJ – Overseer, supervisor = 11.8% ESFJ – Supporter, provider = 11.7% ISTJ – Examiner, inspector = 9.8% ISFJ – Defender, protector = 9.9% All SJs = 43.2%

Creators (SP) ESTP – Persuader, promoter = 8.4% ESFP – Entertainer, performer = 10.3% ISTP – Craftsman, mechanic = 6.4% ISFP – Artist, composer = 7.9% All SPs = 33%

If you think of countries in terms of myers briggs the philippines would likely be too heavily scewed towards ESFJ, and therefore screwed. a servant nation, or a nation of servants.

Ah, excellent way to characterize nations. I have a personality conflict with the Philippines.

My 7 stages of ‘man’/ national evolution: Self preservation Self interest Self awareness (self critical) Self motivation Self respect Self achievement Self reflection

The philippines still hasn’t reached ‘self awareness’, and worse is being run by a clique/minority of ‘mr hydes’, who are on the flip side of the coin, and therefore act as a barrier to development for the majority: Self entitlement Self agrandissment Self promotion Self love Self doubt Self loathing Self destruction

Development is a constant process of ‘push-pull’.

I will put ‘Juan dela cruz’ through a battery of tests and look at the ‘national psyche’! Needs – maslow Values – schwartz Personality – myers-briggs, 16pf Intellect – IQ, SAT/GMAT, PISA Character – big 5, saville & holdsworth Culture – hofstede, lewis Unconscious bias – harvard IAT Group roles – belbin Behaviours – kiersey

When the inputs (people) are damaged, and the processes flawed ( politics/culture/institutions), then the outputs (socio-economic progress) will inevitably be limited. GIGO!

The quality of early education and parenting is key. (IQ levels only increase by approx 3 points every 10 years, and that is in the US, with quality education)

As an example, the impact of absent mothers (OFW’s) is known to limit intellectual development and social skills, so children of ofw’s are in a trap from the outset, with only one way out – become an ofw, and perpetuate the vicious cycle!

On a dashboard of key performance indicators the philippines ranks 80th in the world – vastly underperforming relative to size etc. 3rd/4th division, and with no star players/strikers to put the ball in the net, and certainly no team coach.

The headline economy will inevitably grow, as population itself grows, but to improve its relative/competitive standing and achieve equitable prosperity it needs more transformational leadership and creative strategies, instead of slogans, dreams, ‘jam tomorrow’, and all eggs in china’s basket, or the 2 tier social structure will be cast in cement, which the chinese will no doubt supply!

The fundamentals are an inquiring mind, an open/inclusive culture, equal opportunity, individuality & creativity. The road being taken seems to be exactly the opposite – authoritarianism, nationalism, protectionism, isolationism, collectivity, subservience. anger and anti-(everything).

https://knowledge.insead.edu/leadership-organisations/the-worlds-smartest-countries-6631

“As an example, the impact of absent mothers (OFW’s) is known to limit intellectual development and social skills, so children of ofw’s are in a trap from the outset, with only one way out – become an ofw, and perpetuate the vicious cycle!”

Wow. I wonder how to mainstream that info. Sen. Hontiveros ought to be advised.

This is the other view:

kami po ay hamak sa talikuran nililibak bayani daw sabi ng mga halimaw habang yaman ng bayan ninanakaw sunong sunong napakabigat para lamang taonang GNP nanatiling naka angat.

sa Ingles naman . . .

we as ofws to be water lily floating leaving polluted rivers to qualify to brave deeper cleaner oceans we leave too children under care of kins and parents whose wisdom and love well springs of our ammo to care for the young and dying to work shoulder to shoulder with those who work by their sweat and blood ofws listen not nor believe nay sayers bad things do happen because of the mothers amongst us as we lowly influence may be humbly perpetuate goodness in a bad bad world.

Thanks for the heart, to balance out jamesb’s science. I think it is possible for kids to succeed in any environment if they are fortunate enough to have adults who will point them in the right direction now and then. Fathers and mothers are best, but eating is more important than that. I hold no judgment either way on OFW’s.

This was brought to my attention today, and seems to relate:

That warms the heart as much as Wil’s Aldub and Kita Kita stories.

Indeed it does.

I just sent this to BALITA Toronto as part of a piece which might see print:

“I just read in a blog comment about OFW mothers leaving their children behind to the care of others or to fend for themselves. I somehow disagreed and thought there’s a positive side to the issue.

Being a talkative old man I see and recognize more the Pinays than the Pinoy OFWs in Ontario. Most of them in two or threes ride buses to take the kids to the Malls or libraries and I tell them: “The kids look good and very pretty. Take care of them, Love them and when they grow up they will like the Philippines. You are our Ambassadors of goodwill to future generations of Canadians.”

The young baby sitters were laughing saying how the kids love adobo and pancit they cooked for them while the older ones who looked like mothers just smile with hidden sadness in their eyes as they perhaps remember their own they left behind at home. And so I wrote something in appreciation of what the good they do for their families and their country.”

I failed to say that OFW mothers and young baby-sitters were raised by good parents from whom they learned their skills for compassion and to whom they are leaving their children. Yeah some kids do fell into the cracks but those are the exceptions.

THE ASEAN COUNTRY WITH BALLS

It used to be that Vietnam and Philippines were one on being tough with Beijing. Now Vietnam finds itself in its lonesome crying in the wilderness. But though succumbing somewhat to realpolitik, it may be relatively unbowed. It seems it is in the country’s genes. One tough cookie that country.

We are talking here of “A vision of the Philippine future.” It is interesting to contemplate the future of a country such as Vietnam.

http://globalnation.inquirer.net/159372/vietnam-challenges-china-asean-talks

From the guy in blue to the guy in gray — … uhm, tell that to the marines.

Viet Nam is truly independent and for sure has a sense of sovereign identity and rights. Trust me. I know that first hand (1968-69).

I can trust a soldier with experiences from a foxhole with my life.

In Dien Bien Phu, in Hanoi , in Hue, Cam Ranh Bay, Danang and Saigon two world powers were brought down to their knees by this country of short and thin men with balls of steel and will do it alone without their ballsless brothers in Asia’s paper tiger.

I just learned that Senator Trillanes reads the blog. He told me he read my comments and that got my dad worried, he just said its ok. I was relieved, I thought I said something wrong or something.

Something to share that are not that sensitive Ok as expected, he thinks that he is not really having a quarrel with Joma Sison.

The cabinet is filled with the left, many Usecs and Asecs are with the left, and both left and the military in cabinet are not comfy with each other.

I heard something else that I will keep to my self regarding a Comelec chair.

Well, how interesting, and I consider it an honor that the Senator reads now and then. I know I’ve said good and bad, and like water, it is under the bridge. Lately, it has been good, so consider me enlightened and him a rock of consistency. 🙂

I tend to think the military in the cabinet is more important than the leftists and if push comes to shove, the military people will not be pushed out.

As a clarfication, I meant that Duterte is not really having a quarrel with Joma Sison.

Yes, I think the military in the cabinet are more importsnt than the left.

Two captains were brothers in arms and in their principles at Oakwood in Ayala but when they reached a road that forks they went separate ways with their principles, these two soldiers still young are two men to watch for a clearer different vision of the Philippines future. They have the same vision (where they want to go) yet they have chosen seoarate missions (how to get there).

Faeldon and most of the prominent Magdalo are now with the BOC. I have not realized this if it waa not fir the BOC controversy.

About Dads Karl, AT IV’s dad was in my Executive Panel along with Commander Manuel in the late 70s in the AFP-CGSC at Fort B. Admiral Jardie was then Deputy Commandant.

The senator’s dad and my dad were mistahs at the PMA (class 59). Admiral Jardiniano was the first or second FOIC of the Cory administration, if I am not mistaken. CGSC,I know almost all Colonels and Navy Captains have to go through GSC. Have you by any chance met my dad?

Karl, I probably met and talk with your dad; in 1959 was with the UP Group (Cdt Col Herme Dumlao was our Section Marcher) which lived for a week in Melchor Hall with the PeeMayers (not PMAyers yet) with Gen Soliman as Suptdent and Nap Angeles as Baron. I stayed with Charlie Coy barracks, afterwards exchanged letters once with incoming Baron JMCDL Zumel. His 2nd Capt will be R Imperial.

Cadets asked me why my Pershing Cap was different from all the others with a green lining (I was Model Coy Co in the Los Banos ROTC Unit). Rayadillo for the Model Coy is yet to come. For reasons of principles I did not apply for commissionship after finishing the Prob 2nd Lt training at Camp V Lim. Sharing this info of more than half a century ago means nothing now but water under many collapsed bridges.

On APF-CGSC (prerequisite for the first star) , I did a five year stint as member of the Directing Staff in the UP Development Administration Module trying to inculcate civilian mode of governance during Martial Law to full colonels and Elticols. That’s about 60 students per class per year, so many I might not correctly place your Dad in what class.

Thanks so much Popoy. 🙂👍🏻

U R welcome Karl. there’s where I learned the admonitions : dumbguard and dumbflicket; in Loakan, the PMA Campus actually sits on a gold mine.

Don’t keep that to yourself Karl…… 🙂

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/920862/wife-says-poll-chief-has-unexplained-wealth

OK, it is out, Some rumors I hear are true and not kuryente pala. 😉 Would this mean another impeachment, or would this open a can of worms. Would these be the new flavor of the week of the news media,so we could forget about BOC which made us forget about Imee and the Ilocos 6, how will this comelec chair impeachment case affect the poll protest of BBM abd Leni? Will BBM be the new DILG sec and not Año?

Lesson nr one for government employees and politicians: Don’t make your asawa angry Lesson nr two for government employees and politicians: Don’t make your asawa angry

Interesting point:

If amassed during PCGG: Negative for BongBong (Another proof of illigal wealth.) If amassed during Comelec: Positive for BongBong (Proof of rigged election.)

Interesting times ahead……

Yes, interesting. Bautista suggested abolition of PCGG before leaving the post.

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/920860/comelec-chief-accuses-wife-of-extortion-attempt

hahahaha…popcorn, mango juice for JoeAm……

Haha. Sex tape fb upload blackmail ?

THE PIVOTING GAME AND ITS CONSEQUENCES

This is the recent trend: US pivots into itself away from EU, China and Russia, while China pivots to Russia and Russia and EU thinks of pivots to China. This complicates US security moves with North Korea, the natural ally of China and Russia.

Duterte pivots farther away from the US and pivots to China and Russia; and China and Russia are just too happy about it. they are willing to buy or buy more bananas from the BPR.

There is a certain parallelism as in the above. Fighting ISIS-related terrorism is not made easy with the PH version of its pivot:

* the Philippine military for decades are used to the military intelligence, methodology and weaponry not to mention the camaraderie with its US-advisers counterpart;

* sure, China and Russia are just too willing to sell arms, something the PH soldiers have to get used to — Russia is even willing to sell submarines to PH — but military intelligence and advices on fighting terrorists, is debatable. Besides, the benefit/cost ratio to doing other than sell arms is probably not attractive. China and Russia have their own Muslim sectors, also these two countries want to maintain good relationships with Muslim countries — it may not be too nice for them to be seen as active in acts against Muslims even only in an advisory capacity.

I could be a little wrong, but the comraderie and esprit de corps between the Filipino and American soldiers never faltered or wavered, same with their mother organizations the AFP and the US Military regardless of diplomatic and political eche bucheche. When Pinoy soldiers needs ordnance as in Marawi, their Kano buddies send them sans fanfare and political bugles–even though in trickles. Notwithstanding saliva fisticuffs between their Commander-in-Chiefs. The free gossiping press never reported Trump castigating back Duterte’s shadow boxing America’s international image. .

http://www.france24.com/en/20170610-us-forces-assist-philippines-military-marawi-siege-islamic-state-group

https://www.dawn.com/news/1337581

http://globalnation.inquirer.net/157885/us-ambassador-mum-details-military-support-marawi

there could be more but must stop here.

Popoy, thanks for the note and the links.

U R Welcome NH.

I stumbled upon the two websites below while cruising the Internet. Their authors write about PH current events. They are obviously not happy with the PH status quo and do not mince words when expressing their discontent. I often find their views to be frank, logical and devoid of histrionics. I like people who make sense and these two authors’ sites ooze beaucoup sense.

https://pinoyakoblog.com

https://manilapagpag.wordpress.com

Who ate all the pies!

Growth can be organic and transactional, or dynamic and transformational, and in essence national development is about growing the macro-economic pie (via innovation and/or population), or taking a larger slice of the international pie (via competition, aquisition, and/or expansion) through an appropriate mix of strategies and policies.

Innovation is largely dependent upon the quality of education, competition upon the type of culture, and aquisition/expansion upon the attitude to globalisation.

The Philippines does not have a vision, or policies, which will change its current approach of a low cost labour model at home, exporting people abroad, and holding out a begging bowl for international aid. Maintaining the status quo remains paramount to the free-loading politicians and business cartels, at the expense of economic transformation, societal mobility, and global integration.

The three stated headline goals by 2022 of, reducing poverty by 1.5% per annum (9% in 6 years), creating an additional 1 million new jobs each year (therefore 2.5 million new jobs each year in total), and achieving middle-income status by 2022, are not part of a vision, but a pipe-dream sold to a gullible electorate. NEDA is clearly comprised of fantasists, not economists. The cabinet is clearly comprised of senility, not ability.

The money-go-round: Bring money – tourism Make money – speculators (short-term) Send money – ofw’s remittances Cash in money – sell assets Spend money – exports & services Create money – entrepreneurs/intellectual property/added value Invest money – capital (long-term) ‘Rent’ money – rent-seeking – banks, utilities, property ‘Gimme money’ – aid Illegal money – dark economy, corruption, crime

There is insufficient focus upon home-grown manufacturing, moving agriculture up the value chain, and developing a ‘start-up’/entrepreneurial culture. Closed markets, ‘closed shops’, and closed minds in government reflect the strategic myopia.

It is also not just the lack of separation of powers – executive, legislative, judicial – which is problematic, but the combination, and conflict, of interests between politics and business, with the unholy alliance of oligarchs and dynasties strangling innovation, sustainable growth, and equitable wealth distribution. Inequality will inevitably become worse, as will the dynastic control of political positions, national and local, which already stands at circa 65%+ of all positions. Exclusivity and cronyism, instead of inclusion and meritocracy.

The lack of intellect and integrity of dynast duterte and his incompetent gerontocracy will make the future more akin to an keynesian nightmare, replaying the failed arroyo model with a dash of marcos madness thrown into the mix. 20th century thinking will not solve 21st century problems.

‘I learnt one thing from studying economics. Economists are never right.’

Haha, yeah, rather like bookies! There does seem to be a lack of earnest, candid thought. Much bs. It is amazing how good it tastes to so many.

Cayetano did 100% copy the habits of Duterte….He also went missing during the Asean event…..:-)

Hahahaha………………….

What a poor representation PH made hosting this meeting. Restricting press access, sending trolls as PH journalists, having Cayetano do the old ‘skip and run’ as Vietnam Nam was standing tall against China.

Weasel comes to my mind?

Among other words. None of praise.

Notes from the Editor

I would like to thank Giancarlo Angulo for taking over administration of the blog to keep it available as a historical resource and to free me to pursue other interests. He is now “the boss of the blog”, haha. I expect to contribute articles from time to time. JA

The Society of Honor is published via Word Press hosting in the United States. The blog is not accredited by any government or non-government entity, is not a member of any association or group, and is generally not an originator of news. The blog is not an advocacy of any particular cause.

Please read the ‘Policy and Terms’ tab for further information.

Follow Blog via Email

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Email Address:

Reflection on The Philippines a Century Hence by Jose Rizal

Related Papers

Rocel Erica Calma

Rethink how Rizal almost begged for reforms within the Spanish colonial setup through this paper and predicted correctly that the Americans would invade the country if Spain refuses to institute reform. Upon perusing Rizal's "The Philippines A Century Hence" via firsthand experience, I am impressed by the insightful and insightful conclusions he made regarding the future of his native land. Written more than a century ago, Rizal's insight is remarkably precise and thought-provoking.

Trisha Mae Abainza

"The Philippines, A Century Hence" by Jose Rizal is a seminal work that serves as a poignant reflection on the socio-political landscape of the Philippines during the late 19th century. Written in 1889, Rizal's essay is a prescient analysis that not only calls for internal reforms within the Spanish colonial system but remarkably predicts the eventual American intervention if Spain fails to address the grievances of its Filipino subjects. This literary masterpiece provides a profound glimpse into Rizal's visionary thinking and offers valuable insights into the historical trajectory of the Philippines as it navigates the challenges of colonization and the quest for national identity.

Angel O . Untal IV

The Philippines: A Century hence was written by Jose Rizal and was published in La Solaridad, a newspaper run by Filipino Illustrados in Spain. This essay was made to supplement his works, especially his two famous works “Noli Me Tangere” and El Filibusterismo” as his works made confusion on what it wants to entail to its readers. Because the readers of his works interpreted it as a means to spread the message of revolution but he do not condone violence and all he wanted is reformation and assimilation to what he called “the mother country” Spain. His work was heavily influenced by the enlightenment ideology spreading in Europe during his time and by the book of Feodor Jagor. His essay talks about the past what was the Philippines like before and the present time (during his time) and used it as a basis to form a hypothesis on what will happen to the Philippines in the future, hence it is not a random prediction. And what he told was did really happen in the Philippines later. His essay contains the miseries Filipinos experienced during the three decades of the Spanish regime, the reasons why the Filipinos awakened their nationalism, how the Spaniards keep the Filipino indolent and submissive, why Spain could not stop the liberal ideologies emergence in the Philippines, how it can lead to revolution, how to prevent the revolution and it is through reformation, what will happen if the Philippines becomes separated to Spain like how can the country keep its liberty from other foreign invaders, and who among the foreign invaders will colonize the Philippines. He forecasted that after many a century, the Philippines will be in the hands of new foreign masters.

Cefren Pao Bubos

Justine jannah Taguibao

Christine Jane Zarsadias

REACTION ON JOSE RIZAL’S: THE PHILIPPINES A CENTURY HENCE

Patrisha Nicolle de leon

Camille Angela Zarate

A paper on how Rizal almost begged for reforms within the Spanish colonial setup through "The Philippines a Century Hence" and predicted correctly that the Americans would invade the country if Spain refuses to institute reform.

Niña Angeline Infante

Activity No.5: Buhay at Mga Sinulat ni Rizal Rethink how Rizal almost begged for reforms within the Spanish colonial setup through this paper and predicted correctly that the Americans would invade the country if Spain refuses to institute reform.

Jenny Mituda

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

Advanced Search

América Latina: Español
América Latina: Português
Mission and goals
Strategic partners
Health Care Without Harm in Africa
Global team
Health Care Without Harm board
Coronavirus resource center
Climate and health news
Subscribe to our newsletters
About Global Green and Healty Hospitals
Imagine a green and healthier world
The Global Green and Healthy Hospitals agenda
Climate Impact Checkup
Climate change: an opportunity for action
Our approach: mitigation, resilience and leadership
Sustainable cooling
Air pollution
Why sustainable procurement
Sustainable Health in Procurement Project (SHiPP)
Sustainable Procurement Index for Health
SDGs and procurement
Impact of health care waste management
What we are doing
Health care waste and Sustainable Development Goals
Projects and case studies
Infectious waste
Sharps waste
Pharmaceutical waste
Pathological and anatomical waste
A fifteen years global campaign
Mercury and environmental health
Mercury free members
Switching to alternatives
Minamata Convention
Model policies
Chemicals and environmental health
Chemicals in health care
Plastic pollution

ESSAY | Post-Pandemic Philippines and the New World Order: “Why does it matter and what can we do?”

News posted by hcwhasia on June 3, 2020

Tags: pandemic , Healthcare , philippines

An essay written and submitted by Dr. Ronald Law

In former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger’s recent COVID-19 article, he mused that “nations cohere and flourish on the belief that their institutions can foresee calamity, arrest its impact and restore stability.” More than giving a rush of blood to the head of anyone in power, this brings into front and center the role of politics in a disease process as complicated and transcendental as this pandemic. Apart from being an epidemiologic phenomenon that has caused a global death toll that can parallel if not surpass that of previous plagues of our civilization, COVID-19 had unraveled the powers of nations and their leaders—their strengths and flaws—as they try their best, following a contagion dynamic, to maintain equilibrium in their part of the world by containing the disease lest it spirals out of control and spread to other areas.

COVID-19 was first reported in December last year as a mysterious respiratory illness afflicting seafood market workers in Wuhan, China. Next thing we knew, it had already spread rapidly to multiple countries and to date had ravaged the entire world with massive cases and deaths in its trail and immeasurable economic and social costs for our world to bear now and in generations to come. How did it start? Was it naturally occurring or intentionally released? Was there a delay in reporting? Was there a cover-up? What global cooperation strategies can be deployed? What nations will emerge victorious in the response? After this coronavirus pandemic, what superpower will change the world order? Which kind of politics will prevail? What will be the fate of global health governance? Which countries stand to gain? How will health systems be transformed? How will people benefit from changes in the global health security movement?

These are questions that can frame our understanding of politosomatics which explores the links between politics and pandemics. As Mika Aaltola theorized, a “dis-ease” at the individual somatic body may be viewed as part of a bigger movement in the global political hierarchy. From the deadly Spanish Flu (H1N1) pandemic in 1918 to the hyped-up (because it proved benign later) Swine Flu (also H1N1) pandemic in 2009 to the coronavirus disease of today, pandemics albeit invisible enemies are real, tangible and personal. Individuals and societies are often gripped by their resultant fear, distress and anxiety.

The old and new worlds of the East and West with their differing levels of economy and health system capacities, nuance of ideologies and culture, mix of fear, paranoia and indifference became good staging grounds for pandemics. This “coming plague” storyline started in the 1990s when Avian Flu was all the rage. Initially a disease of wild birds in China that threatened the poultry industry, human practices with livestock and mutation allowed the Avian Flu virus to jump from animals to humans and the thought of migratory birds flying to many destinations and spreading the disease propagated a medico-security paradigm that looks at external health threats as an important security issue of any country.

The “yellow danger” biohazard sign to mark unsafe sites couldn’t be more straightforward. This started the whole containment drama and military-inspired bio-preparedness tactics (think of Outbreak the movie) to mitigate the impacts of infectious diseases. Although disproportionately impacting the food security sector, Avian Flu was enough to stir the health security discourse and trigger the pandemic fantasies of the world then. Until 2003, with the US-led war on terror gaining traction after the 9/11 attacks, the perfect disease storm, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) came about. Again, it started in China but the disease surprised the world when it rapidly spread to major hubs around the world because of global interconnectedness through air travel and superspreaders—infected people who could unknowingly but exponentially infect many others—causing major economic losses and social disruptions in no time. In one fell swoop, SARS met the definition of a pandemic being able to shut down modern life support systems.

These interweaving pandemic and politics stories underscore the need for individual countries, regardless of their positions and power in international politics, to develop capacities for preparedness and resilience to pandemics--the quintessential health threat to the world order. This is at the core of the International Health Regulations (IHR) and the global health security agenda.

The Philippines, if we are to benefit from, if not change, the new world order after coronavirus, should be strategic enough to use its political resources (and people) and work with global partners not only to respond to COVID-19 but also to do its role in shaping the future of global health security.

There are two ways to go about it. First, we need to democratize the politics of pandemics by relating it to our daily lives. We need to study political response and people participation in the pandemic. Who are the political actors? What are their interests and agenda? Why are they intent on doing COVID-19 work? How do they organize their political milieu and use people and resources? How do they use power, influence, knowledge, networks? We need to study the curious use of politics by these leaders--all in the name of alleviating people’s suffering from the common ill. As the governed, we have rights and freedom to inquire about these. We also have our obligations to participate and do our part as responsible citizens of our society. Second, we need to hold leaders to account by setting clear expectations. We need to feel a new brand of leadership that rises above the usual politics to do work that are necessary no matter how difficult, costly and inconvenient they are just to achieve our goals. Putting people’s basic needs over political considerations in this pandemic should go beyond lip service. We need to perceive better ways of promoting cooperation and collaboration when leaders engage different kinds of people. Sincerity, transparency and openness can go a long way in winning public trust and confidence. This is absolutely necessary if people are to adopt prescribed behaviors. Effective crisis communication could also play a role in informing our decisions and actions. We need to see results and get feedbacks whether positive or negative so we can all learn from lessons, adapt and adjust our strategies to adapt to the new normal. Sharing of data, exchange of information and joint planning and decision-making can empower both the leadership and the people to turn around this challenging situation.

In every epic story of battle, there will be villains and there will be heroes. Some will be recognized and a few put on a pedestal; most will be relegated to our short-term memory while some may be totally forgotten. In the world after this coronavirus, as Filipinos and global citizens doing our part, we can see that global solidarity will win over national interests and humanity will prevail as the most important asset to health security. Politics if done right can change the world for the better after a pandemic. ###

Dr. Ronald Law is a physician, public health specialist and professor of public health at the University of the Philippines-College of Public Health. He obtained a fellowship in public health emergencies and emerging health issues at Griffith University, Australia and investigated the topic of health security at the University of Washington, U.S.A. as a US-ASEAN Fulbright visiting scholar.

Quick Links

How do you foresee the Philippines ten years from now?

In ten years, the Philippines is likely to see continued economic growth and development, driven by factors such as infrastructure investments, technological advancements, and a growing young workforce. Challenges such as income inequality, environmental sustainability, and political stability will also need to be addressed for sustained progress.

Add your answer:

Would there be ten questions with answers related to Philippine history?

You will find more than ten questions with corresponding answers in the Philippines History category.

Who are the top ten most intelligent people in Philippines?

It's difficult to definitively rank the top ten most intelligent people in the Philippines as intelligence is subjective and diverse. However, some notable Filipino individuals known for their intelligence include Fe del Mundo (first woman admitted to Harvard Medical School), Diosdado Macapagal (former Philippine president), and Nicanor Perlas (environmentalist and activist).

What is the Maragtas?

The Maragtas is a collection of oral legends that recount the history of the ten descendants of the Bornean datus who settled in Panay, Philippines. It is considered a valuable source of Filipino history before the Spanish colonization.

What are the top ten hardest board exams in the Philippines as of 2015?

As of 2015, some of the top ten hardest board exams in the Philippines included the Physician Licensure Exam, Bar Exam, Chemical Engineering Board Exam, Civil Engineering Board Exam, and Certified Public Accountant Licensure Exam. Other challenging exams are the Architect Licensure Exam, Mechanical Engineering Board Exam, Electrical Engineering Board Exam, Electronics Engineering Board Exam, and Geodetic Engineering Board Exam. These exams are known for their rigorous and comprehensive content, high passing rate requirements, and reputation for difficulty among examinees.

How do you write an essay on where do you see yourself in ten years?

To write an essay on where you see yourself in ten years, start by envisioning your future career, personal life, and goals. Reflect on the steps needed to achieve these aspirations and consider any challenges or opportunities that may arise. Be specific, set realistic expectations, and highlight how your skills and experiences will help you reach your desired future self.

Top Categories

Subscribe Now

[OPINION] 10 years of writing about Philippine economics

Already have Rappler+? Sign in to listen to groundbreaking journalism.

This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.

[OPINION] 10 years of writing about Philippine economics

ALEJANDRO EDORIA

Today marks my 10 th year contributing economics op-ed pieces for Rappler. How time flies! And what a blast it has been!

My longtime editor, Chay Hofileña, likes to joke about this by saying this is my longest relationship yet. Kidding aside, I’m truly grateful to her for taking a chance on the unsolicited email of a 23-year-old graduate student a decade ago, and liking my style of writing about economic issues.

Since then Ma’am Chay – as well as the other lovely and redoubtable Rappler manangs – showed me the ropes and taught me lots about journalism, which I didn’t really study formally. Now I’d like to think my writing is all the better for it.

To date I’ve written 322 articles for Rappler (including this one), initially appearing in the iSpeak and IMHO sections, then graduating into the Thought Leaders section starting September 10, 2016.

Through my pieces, I’ve captured some pretty big developments and shifts in Philippine economics and politics. Let me share with you 10 pieces that encapsulate that journey.

1. Kasambahay Law: Its unintended consequences (January 31, 2013)

The article that started it all. For one reason or another, I felt strongly about this piece of legislation when it was signed into law by the late former president Benigno Aquino III on January 18, 2013. Applying (rather naively, I admit) basic lessons from microeconomics, I argued that legislating the wages of househelps or kasambahay might lead to some of them becoming unemployed if their employers’ couldn’t afford it.

Unfortunately, years later, the implementation of the Kasambahay Law remains poor . Although there are now help desks in DOLE regional offices catering to househelps specifically, many househelps remain unaware of the benefits they’re entitled to under the law. Many employers are also not complying. Monitoring of househelp remains difficult because of DOLE’s lack of staff, as well as the difficulty of gaining access to many househelps’ areas of work.

Economists’ understanding of the minimum wage has also drastically shifted since then. Whereas before economists were deathly afraid of minimum wage hikes (because they supposedly lead to unemployment), the empirical evidence for that is a lot weaker now. In certain contexts, higher minimum wages may even lead to higher employment.

The lessons: just because a law is approved doesn’t mean it will be implemented, and the feared of unintended consequences will pan out. (Maybe the poor implementation itself is also an unintended consequence?) Also, don’t take textbook economic models and theories too seriously.

2. Marcos years marked ‘golden age’ of PH economy? Look at the data (March 5, 2016)

This piece was inspired by the BusinessWorld piece of my former professor, Dr. Emmanuel de Dios of the UP School of Economics, on the same topic. After reading that, I decided to dig deeper, and that got me obsessed about Martial Law economics. I discovered for myself that there’s a ton of empirical data showing that Martial Law was not the country’s “golden age,” and in this piece I shared some of those data.

At that time, I was elated by the splash this article made. But I overestimated the power of data to change people’s minds about an issue, and underestimated the strength of the Marcoses’ propaganda machine, the social media echo chambers, and the cognitive biases that could lead people to prefer falsehoods to truth.

Since then Martial Law economics has been a key research interest. In February 2023, I will be publishing my first book – False Nostalgia: The Marcos Golden Age Myths and How to Debunk Them – combining 7 years’ worth of research on Martial Law economics. The starting point of that journey was this Rappler piece.

3. Free tuition alone won’t make college any more accessible (March 9, 2017)

Through my pieces, I get to indirectly participate in legislative debates and proposals. One of the memorable pieces of legislation in the past years was the free tuition law, that made college education free in all state universities and colleges, as well as local ones.

Using past research and government data, I showed that the richest fifth of tertiary students are overrepresented vis-à-vis the poorest fifth. So, arguably, the free tuition law stands to give billions worth of subsidies to rich kids who can actually afford to pay for college tuition. What a waste! This subsidy of course posed as a fiscal strain: why should the government subsidize the rich this way?

I remember receiving praise from colleagues saying the original article (there was also a follow-up piece in 2019) was a great use of statistics to argue for sound economics. But I remember receiving a lot of flak as well on Twitter from those from the Left (especially the young ones), saying I should stop spewing such “neoliberal” BS. The attacks were so intense I had to leave Twitter for a few days and let things subside.

As with many legislative proposals, politics and populism trump economics. Former president Rodrigo Duterte signed the free tuition law in August that year.

I realized then that my pieces can be quite triggering for some groups ascribing to certain closely held narratives or ideologies. But so long as I’m using data and evidence to back up my claims, I should be fine.

4. Why is Philippine inflation now the highest in ASEAN? (September 6, 2018)

Discussing macroeconomic statistics and trends is a recurring theme of my Rappler pieces. In fact, macro developments have significantly shifted my teaching and research interests in this direction (vis-à-vis microeconomics).

One of the more memorable trends I wrote about was the spell of high inflation in 2018. That year inflation reached a nine-year high, and was also the highest inflation rate in ASEAN around September and October. I had fun triangulating the reasons for this, with factors ranging from the rice shortage brought about by the Duterte administration, the rising trade deficit, inflation expectations, and the ill timing of the TRAIN law, which raised excise taxes just as world oil prices were rising.

I also rebutted claims by the Duterte economic managers then that rising inflation was “not alarming” and “quite normal in a fast-growing economy.” Such rebuttals have irked the economic managers a number of times, based on reports from my friends in different agencies. Little do those officials know that I receive a lot of positive feedback (even encouragement) as well from many economist colleagues, who are just constrained from speaking out in one way or another.

5. Dengvaxia scare: How rumors caused viral outbreaks (January 16, 2019)

I use my Rappler pieces to show that economics can be related to other fields of study, such as public health.

I particularly liked writing this piece about the ill effects of the Dengvaxia scare perpetrated by certain personalities of the Duterte administration. In a nutshell, disinformation surrounding the new dengue vaccine spilled over to other vaccines, and parents ended up not having their children take basic shots for measles and like diseases. Hence, all sorts of otherwise preventable epidemics spread across the country. The opening sentence captured it rather nicely: “Fake news can kill, and the Dengvaxia scare is a perfect example of it.”

This was a perfect illustration of so-called “negative externalities” in economics. And I remember incorporating this piece in my microeconomics classes back then. Little did we know that the Dengvaxia scare would presage the even greater troubles wrought by the global pandemic just one year later.

6. Dismal PISA rankings: A wake-up call for Filipinos (December 4, 2019)

Education issues have always been close to my heart, and I was particularly devasted by news that we ranked so poorly in the 2018 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Specifically, we ranked dead last in reading, and second to last in math and science.

Later, even more bad news came when we also ranked dead last in the 2019 TIMSS (Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study). Meanwhile, the first ever Southeast Asia Primary Learning Metrics in 2019 also showed that 9 in 10 schoolchildren in the Philippines can’t read basic texts.

Long story short, we’re experiencing a full-blown education crisis – undoubtedly worsened by the pandemic, what with the extremely long school closures and the “learning losses” from online classes.

I argued that all these studies ought to be a wake-up call for Filipinos. But the attitude from education officials has been characterized by denialism and gaslighting. The Department of Education, for instance, complained that they were not consulted for a World Bank education report. After that, the World Bank took down their report from their website. I wrote about this in “ 8 facts from WB education report they don’t want you to read .”

7. Why Filipinos need to stay at home until June (or even longer) (March 19, 2020)

By far my most viral piece ever (pun unintended). I wrote about this days after Duterte imposed the first COVID lockdown nationwide. At the time, everyone was at a loss about what’s going on, and nobody knew until when Duterte’s strict lockdowns would last.

I saw some analyses on Facebook by experts in biomedical data and biostatistics, showing the exponential rise of COVID-19 cases that necessitates prolonged lockdowns up to at least June that year. This was quite concerning to a lot of people: many people thought the lockdowns would just last days or a few weeks.

But little did we know that the lockdowns would be a lot longer than that, with some form of mobility restrictions lasting up to 2 years or more, with varying degrees of strictness nationwide (I discovered recently that the lockdowns were very severe in places like Camiguin Island). Also, the lockdowns would turn out to be a political tool of the Duterte administration to subjugate people, especially the poor.

COVID would dominate a lot of my Rappler pieces since then: constituting maybe a fourth of all my pieces, ranging from the economics of lockdowns , the health versus economy trade-off , the inadequate and slow distribution of economic aid , the glacial pace of vaccination , the Duterte government’s wrong budget priorities (I collaborated a lot with my friends Zy-za Suzara and Luis Abad on this topic), and pandemic-related corruption (e.g., Pharmally).

Fast-forward to 2023, our lives are normalizing now. But I’m glad to be able to document the economics of the pandemic through Rappler; later I might just write a book about it.

8. 10 Build, Build, Build projects that started in previous admins (June 23, 2021)

My Rappler columns are often a venue to debunk some of the lies and misconceptions said by government officials. And quite a few people look forward to my pieces when it comes to economic mistruths.

The Duterte administration was particularly fond of boasting about its “flagship” economic project, an infrastructure spending spree called “Build, Build, Build” (BBB). However, upon closer inspection, many of projects under BBB were in fact started by previous administrations. My friend Zy-za Suzara, formerly with the Department of Budget and Management, co-wrote this piece with me on the rampant credit-grabbing of the Duterte administration.

Some other pieces I wrote on economic lies include those about the “ Duterte Legacy ,” the statistics behind the war on drugs , the TRAIN law , and the recurring claim that we would soon be an “ upper-middle income country ” (we’re still not).

9. Malubha ang state of the nation (July 23, 2021)

Up until the middle of 2021, I’ve been writing almost exclusively in English. But months before the pivotal 2022 elections, there was growing concern about the looming possibility of another Marcos presidency. And I figured I needed to write more in Filipino (if not exclusively in Filipino) to try to reach a wider audience with my economics pieces, especially those that would figure in the electoral debates and discussions. I started with this piece, on the last State of the Nation Address of former president Duterte.

Writing in Filipino was quite liberating for me: I could write quicker, and I could use the nuances of everyday language in a way I couldn’t do with English. For instance, I found myself incorporating more jokes and witticisms, as well as pop culture references. Most of all, I discovered that there was indeed a huge reader base of articles in Filipino: interactions and engagement with my pieces blew up.

I wrote in Filipino until end of 2022, and switched back to English just recently. But I may still put in some Filipino pieces here and there.

10. Budol of the century (May 12, 2022)

Even if my column is primarily about economics, I can’t avoid writing about politics from time to time. This piece was written a few days after the 2022 elections, when the partial and unofficial results showed that another yet Marcos would sit in Malacañang.

Apart from showing some of the election results across the regions, I explored possible reasons for the landslide win of the teamup between Bongbong Marcos and Sara Duterte. These include intense regionalism (which pervades much of everyday life, culture, and politics), “networked disinformation,” historical distortions, and the broken educational system. These are pretty much the same issues that led to the landslide win of administration senators in the 2019 midterm elections, which I also wrote about in “ Why is Duterte still so popular ?”

All in all, writing for Rappler in the past decade has been an unalloyed boon for me and my career. My writing has made me grow as a writer and economist, and I’ve also made a ton of new friends along the way. (I’ve irked some people, too, from all sides of the political spectrum. But I guess that’s an occupational hazard, and one more measure of the impact of one’s writing.)

Here’s to another 10 years of writing for Rappler! – Rappler.com

JC Punongbayan, PhD is an assistant professor at the UP School of Economics and the author of the forthcoming book, False Nostalgia: The Marcos Golden Age Myths and How to Debunk Them . JC’s views are independent of his affiliations. Follow him on Twitter ( @jcpunongbayan ) and Usapang Econ Podcast .

Add a comment

Please abide by Rappler's commenting guidelines .

There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.

How does this make you feel?

JC Punongbayan

Recommended stories, {{ item.sitename }}, {{ item.title }}, [rappler’s best] us does propaganda of course..

Probe into Pentagon’s alleged anti-vax campaign sought

Pentagon ran secret anti-vax campaign to undermine China during pandemic

Zelenskyy hopes to see Mirage 2000 jets in Ukraine soon after Macron promise

Duterte gave green light to transfer P47.6-B pandemic funds to PS-DBM – Duque

Duterte administration

Vp ‘breaks up’ with the president: the many times it happened in philippine history.

[EDITORIAL] All roads lead to Duterte

France Castro wants Duterte summoned to House appropriations panel hearing

World View with Marites Vitug: Assessing the Philippines, from Duterte to Marcos

Marcos Jr. administration

Marcos downplays impact of sara duterte’s cabinet exit on uniteam coalition.

Newsbreak Chats: What 2025 looks like after the administration breakup

[WATCH] The new Negros Island Region: What’s it about?

Divorce, SOGIE still excluded from Marcos’ updated list of priority measures

‘Not a misunderstanding’: PH changes tune on China’s Ayungin harassment

Checking your Rappler+ subscription...

Upgrade to Rappler+ for exclusive content and unlimited access.

Why is it important to subscribe? Learn more

You are subscribed to Rappler+

Get the Reddit app

For students from the Philippines, by students from the Philippines. For strand, course, and admission questions, please post on r/CollegeAdmissionsPH

What you think will happen to the Philippines 50 years from now?

Any thoughts?

IMAGES

How do You see Yourself 10 Years from Now
How Can You See Yourself 10 Years From Now Essay
10 Years From Now
10 years from now
Brief Essay III Perez.pdf.docx
SOLUTION: 10 years from now essay

COMMENTS

Philippines predictions for 2030
2030. Read 15 predictions about Philippines in 2030, a year that will see this country experience significant change in its politics, economics, technology, culture, and environment. It's your future, discover what you're in for. Quantumrun Foresight prepared this list; A trend intelligence consulting firm that uses strategic foresight to ...
How do I foresee Philippines ten years from now
And that are my dreams and predictions to the Philippines 10 years from now. I have so many dreams in our country, and that dream will turn into reality, if we choose the right leader, a leader who is competent, a leader who listens and prioritize its people, a leader who cares for its country and a leader who has a leadership skill.
The future of the Philippines
In the past year, for instance, all three major credit rating agencies were unanimous - the Philippines is investment grade. Moreover, just two weeks ago, Standard & Poor's gave us yet another upgrade - from BBB- to BBB. The World Economic Forum itself has drastically improved its outlook on the Philippines.
(PDF) Rizal's Vision Forecasting the Future of the Philippines- A
(The Philippine a Century Hence by Dr. Jose Rizal) Submitted to: VALILA JR., JACINTO Submitted by: Justine Jannah Laurel Taguibao BAJ 3-2N S.Y. 2022-2023 Rizal's Vision Forecasting the Future of the Philippines- A Critical Analysis of Jose Rizal's "The Philippines a Century Hence" "The Philippines a Century Hence" is an essay written by ...
The Future of the Philippines: Insights from Rizal's Essay and
Dr. José Rizal discussed his predictions for the Philippines' future in his 1889 essay "The Philippines: A Century from Now." Despite the fact that Rizal did not specifically foresee the details he offered insights into the challenges and aspirations he believed would shape its destiny. In his discussion of the effects of Spanish colonialism in the Philippines, Rizal emphasized his worries ...
(PDF) The Philippines a Century Hence
The Philippines a Century Hence. By Jose Rizal. Jose Rizal, aside from being a great historian, is a ls o a known writer, authored an article. titled "The Philippi nes a Century Ago". It is c ...
Shaping the Future: Predictions for the Philippines in 10
Ten years from now, I foresee The Philippines having a leader that can address the issues of corruption, inequality, and governance. Even though it may not be fully prosperous like the other country, it may be the start of developing and improving the Philippines. the leaders The promotion of human rights, inclusivity, and good governance could ...
A vision of the Philippine future!!!
The three stated headline goals by 2022 of, reducing poverty by 1.5% per annum (9% in 6 years), creating an additional 1 million new jobs each year (therefore 2.5 million new jobs each year in total), and achieving middle-income status by 2022, are not part of a vision, but a pipe-dream sold to a gullible electorate.
Reflection on The Philippines a Century Hence by Jose Rizal
The Philippines a Century Hence by Jose Rizal Dr. Jose P. Rizal, our national hero, wrote an essay called The Philippines a Century Hence to predict the destiny of our country in a hundred years. He published the essay on September 30, 1889, which was over 132 years ago, under La Solidaridad. Rizal thought it was important to remind Spain that ...
ESSAY
An essay written and submitted by Dr. Ronald LawIn former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger's recent COVID-19 article, he mused that "nations cohere and flourish on the belief that their institutions can foresee calamity, arrest its impact and restore stability." More than giving a rush of blood to the head of anyone in power, this brings into front and center the role of politics in ...
How do you see the Philippines in 10 years from now?
In other countries, when you drive badly and get caught, you earn a point. If you earn too much points, your license will be revoked and you can't re-apply for a period of time (can be six months, a year or more). In PH, most of the time I've seen it, you pay a certain amount and take a seminar and that's it. You are back on the road.
Activity 1: How Do You Foresee The Philippines Ten Years From Now
rizal.docx - Free download as Word Doc (.doc / .docx), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free.
How do you foresee the Philippines ten years from now?
Best Answer. In ten years, the Philippines is likely to see continued economic growth and development, driven by factors such as infrastructure investments, technological advancements, and a ...
What do you think the Philippines would look like 10 years from now
I think, 2022 will be a pivotal year due to the election. If pro-admin ang mananalo, its pretty much the same. Kung ano tayo ngayon, probs ganon pa rin tayo ten yrs from now... or baka mas malala pa. If a progressive candidate will win, then most likely, in the aspects that you enumerated, we'll be in a better shape.
10 years from now
The way I see myself ten years from now scares me because I might not know what to expect for me that year, and to tell you the truth, I'll be twenty-eight years old. That year, I will miss my teenage years. I'll be done with school and, ideally, will be doing something that I love to do.
THE Philippines Fifty Years
ESSAY: THE PHILIPPINES FIFTY YEARS HENCE Instructions: Similar to work, write an essay on what you think will happen to the Philippines 50 years from now. Organize your arguments clearly and use evidence whenever necessary. (30 points) have seen that each prosperity or misery is directly proportional to its liberties or prejudices, and ...
[OPINION] 10 years of writing about Philippine economics
Jan 31, 2023 3:41 PM PHT. JC Punongbayan. INFO. Through my pieces, I've captured some pretty big developments and shifts in Philippine economics and politics. Let me share with you 10 pieces ...
PDF New Directions in Filipino Philosophy: Challenges for the Millennial
3 Alfredo Co, "Doing Philosophy in the Philippines: Fifty Years Ago and Fifty Years From Now," in Across the Philosophical Silk Road: A Festschrift in Honor of Alfredo P. Co, vol.6, Doing Philosophy in the Philippines and Other Essays (Manila: UST Publishing House, 2009), 49-62.
Explore: The education system in the Philippines
It was introduced over a six-year period from 2011 to 2017, to bring the Philippines education system in line with the rest of the world. Previously, the Philippines had a 10-year basic education program, the last country in Asia to do so. Lessons are now taught in the language local to the area. The K-12 reforms also saw the establishment of a ...
[Solved] Make an essay about the Philippines 10 years from now. Make
There will also be greater social stability in the Philippines over the next ten years. The government is working to reduce crime and corruption, and to improve human rights. In addition, the country is expected to become more democratic, with more elections and a higher voter turnout. Conclusion. Ten years from now, the Philippines is likely ...
How do You see Yourself 10 Years from Now
it is about on how I see myself ten years from now. yourself 10 years from now hello! my name is christian, am 20 years old and currently in college. today, Skip to document. University; High School ... 188541488 Revised National Plumbing Code of the Philippines. Civil Engineering 100% (27) 6. Propesyon AT MGA Katangian NI Rizal reviewer. Civil ...
What you think will happen to the Philippines 50 years from now?
The Philippines might thrive 50 years from now or become worse than it currently is. It mostly depends on how the future generation and current generation handle the Philippines. I don't have much expectation, but I believe it might get better. For now, we just have to wait for everything to happen. 1.
[Solved] How do you envision the Philippines 10 years from now
Answered by jordanknaul. This is what we will see in the Philippines over the next 10 years: Representative government is on the way out in favor of a federation of dynastic states headed by a strongman. The Constitution will cease to be a document of, by, and for the people, and will be reconfigured to be of, by, and for the entitled.
The Philippines needs rice
Some 2.4 million Filipinos work as rice farmers. But for young people, a rice farmer's grueling and often impoverished life holds dwindling appeal.