deed of assignment effective date

Deed of Assignment (for Intellectual Property)

In the realm of intellectual property, a Deed of Assignment is a formal legal document used to transfer all rights, title, and interest in intellectual property from the assignor (original owner) to the assignee (new owner). This is crucial for the correct transfer of patents, copyrights, trademarks, and other IP rights. The deed typically requires specific legal formalities, sometimes notarization, to ensure it is legally enforceable.

To be legally effective a deed of assignment must contain:

• Title of the Document : It should clearly be labeled as a "Deed of Assignment" to identify the nature of the document.
• Date : The date on which the deed is executed should be clearly mentioned.
• Parties Involved : Full names and addresses of both the assignor (the party transferring the rights) and the assignee (the party receiving the rights). This identifies the parties to the agreement.
• Recitals : This section provides the background of the transaction. It typically includes details about the ownership of the assignor and the intention behind the assignment.
• Definition and Interpretation : Any terms used within the deed that have specific meanings should be clearly defined in this section.
• Description of the Property or Rights : A detailed description of the property or rights being assigned. For intellectual property, this would include details like patent numbers, trademark registrations , or descriptions of the copyrighted material.
• Terms of Assignment : This should include the extent of the rights being transferred, any conditions or limitations on the assignment, and any obligations the assignor or assignee must fulfill as part of the agreement.
• Warranties and Representations : The assignor typically makes certain warranties regarding their ownership of the property and the absence of encumbrances or third-party claims against it.
• Governing Law : The deed should specify which jurisdiction's laws govern the interpretation and enforcement of the agreement.
• Execution and Witnesses : The deed must be signed by both parties, and depending on jurisdictional requirements, it may also need to be witnessed and possibly notarized.
• Schedules or Annexures : If there are detailed lists or descriptions (like a list of patent numbers or property descriptions), these are often attached as schedules to the main body of the deed.

Letter of Assignment (for Trademarks and Patents)

This is a less formal document compared to the Deed of Assignment and is often used to record the assignment of rights or licensing of intellectual property on a temporary or limited basis. While it can outline the terms of the assignment, it may not be sufficient for the full transfer of legal title of IP rights. It's more commonly used in situations like assigning the rights to use a copyrighted work or a trademark license.

For example, company X allows company Y to use their trademark for specific products in a specific country for a specific period.  

At the same time, company X can use a Letter of Assignment to transfer a trademark to someone. In this case, it will be similar to the Deed of Assignment. 

Intellectual Property Sales Agreement

An IP Sales Agreement is a detailed contract that stipulates the terms and conditions of the sale of intellectual property. It covers aspects such as the specific rights being sold, payment terms, warranties regarding the ownership and validity of the IP, and any limitations or conditions on the use of the IP. This document is essential in transactions involving the sale of IP assets.

However, clients usually prefer to keep this document confidential and prepare special deeds of assignment or letter of assignment for different countries.

IP Transfer Declaration

In the context of intellectual property, a Declaration is often used to assert ownership or the originality of an IP asset. For example, inventors may use declarations in patent applications to declare their invention is original, or authors may use it to assert copyright ownership. It's a formal statement, sometimes required by IP offices or courts.

When assigning a trademark, the Declaration can be a valid document to function as a proof of the transfer. For example, a director of company X declares that the company had sold its Intellectual Property to company Y. 

Merger Document

When companies or entities with significant IP assets merge, an IP Merger Document is used. This document outlines how the intellectual property owned by the merging entities will be combined or managed. It includes details about the transfer, integration, or handling of patents, copyrights, trademarks, and any other intellectual property affected by the merger.

In all these cases, the precise drafting of documents is critical to ensure that IP rights are adequately protected and transferred. Legal advice is often necessary to navigate the complexities of intellectual property laws.

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy .

Deed of Assignment: Everything You Need to Know

A deed of assignment refers to a legal document that records the transfer of ownership of a real estate property from one party to another. 3 min read updated on January 01, 2024

Updated October 8,2020:

A deed of assignment refers to a legal document that records the transfer of ownership of a real estate property from one party to another. It states that a specific piece of property will belong to the assignee and no longer belong to the assignor starting from a specified date. In order to be valid, a deed of assignment must contain certain types of information and meet a number of requirements.

What Is an Assignment?

An assignment is similar to an outright transfer, but it is slightly different. It takes place when one of two parties who have entered into a contract decides to transfer all of his or her rights and obligations to a third party and completely remove himself or herself from the contract.

Also called the assignee, the third party effectively replaces the former contracting party and consequently assumes all of his or her rights and obligations. Unless it is stated in the original contract, both parties to the initial contract are typically required to express approval of an assignment before it can occur. When you sell a piece of property, you are making an assignment of it to the buyer through the paperwork you sign at closing.

What Is a Deed of Assignment?

A deed of assignment refers to a legal document that facilitates the legal transfer of ownership of real estate property. It is an important document that must be securely stored at all times, especially in the case of real estate.

In general, this document can be described as a document that is drafted and signed to promise or guarantee the transfer of ownership of a real estate property on a specified date. In other words, it serves as the evidence of the transfer of ownership of the property, with the stipulation that there is a certain timeframe in which actual ownership will begin.

The deed of assignment is the main document between the seller and buyer that proves ownership in favor of the seller. The party who is transferring his or her rights to the property is known as the “assignor,” while the party who is receiving the rights is called the “assignee.”

A deed of assignment is required in many different situations, the most common of which is the transfer of ownership of a property. For example, a developer of a new house has to sign a deed of assignment with a buyer, stating that the house will belong to him or her on a certain date. Nevertheless, the buyer may want to sell the house to someone else in the future, which will also require the signing of a deed of assignment.

This document is necessary because it serves as a temporary title deed in the event that the actual title deed for the house has not been issued. For every piece of property that will be sold before the issuance of a title deed, a deed of assignment will be required.

Requirements for a Deed of Assignment

In order to be legally enforceable, an absolute sale deed must provide a clear description of the property being transferred, such as its address or other information that distinguishes it from other properties. In addition, it must clearly identify the buyer and seller and state the date when the transfer will become legally effective, the purchase price, and other relevant information.

In today's real estate transactions, contracting parties usually use an ancillary real estate sale contract in an attempt to cram all the required information into a deed. Nonetheless, the information found in the contract must be referenced by the deed.

Information to Include in a Deed of Assignment

• Names of parties to the agreement
• Addresses of the parties and how they are binding on the parties' successors, friends, and other people who represent them in any capacity
• History of the property being transferred, from the time it was first acquired to the time it is about to be sold
• Agreed price of the property
• Size and description of the property
• Promises or covenants the parties will undertake to execute the deed
• Signatures of the parties
• Section for the Governors Consent or Commissioner of Oaths to sign and verify the agreement

If you need help understanding, drafting, or signing a deed of assignment, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.

Hire the top business lawyers and save up to 60% on legal fees

Content Approved by UpCounsel

• Define a Deed
• Contract for Deed California
• Contract for Deed in Texas
• Assignment Law
• Deed Contract Agreement
• Assignment Of Contracts
• Legal Assignment
• Deed vs Agreement
• Assignment Legal Definition
• Contract for a Deed

Deed of Assignment or Deed of Novation: Key Differences and Legal Implications of Novation and Assignment Contracts

Novation and assignment stand out as pivotal processes for the transfer of contractual rights and obligations. These legal concepts allow a party to the contract to adapt to changing circumstances, ensuring that business arrangements remain relevant and effective. This article explores the nuances of novation and assignment, shedding light on their distinct legal implications, procedures, and practical applications. Whether you’re a business owner navigating the transfer of service contracts, or an individual looking to understand your rights and responsibilities in a contractual relationship, or a key stakeholder in a construction contract, this guide will equip you with the essential knowledge to navigate these complex legal processes.

Table of Contents

• What is a Deed of Novation? 
• What is a Deed of Assignment? 

Key Differences Between Novation and Assignment Deeds

Need a deed of novation or assignment key factors to consider, selecting the right assignment clause for your contract – helping you make the right choice, what is a deed of novation.

Novation is a legal process that allows a new party to a contract to take the place of an original party in a contract, thereby transferring both the responsibilities and benefits under the contract to a third party. In common law, transferring contractual obligations through novation requires the agreement of all original parties involved in the contract, as well as the new party. This is because novation effectively terminates the original contract and establishes a new one.

A novation clause typically specifies that a contract cannot be novated without the written consent of the current parties. The inclusion of such a clause aims to preclude the possibility of novation based on verbal consent or inferred from the actions of a continuing party. Nevertheless, courts will assess the actual events that transpired, and a novation clause may not always be enforceable. It’s possible for a novation clause to allow for future novation by one party acting alone to a party of their choosing. Courts will enforce a novation carried out in this manner if it is sanctioned by the correct interpretation of the original contract.

Novation is frequently encountered in business and contract law, offering a means for parties to transfer their contractual rights and duties to another, which can be useful if the original party cannot meet their obligations or wishes to transfer their contract rights. For novation to occur, there must be unanimous consent for the substitution of the new party for the original one, necessitating a three-way agreement among the original party, the new party, and the remaining contract party. Moreover, the novation agreement must be documented in writing and signed by all involved parties. Understanding novation is essential in the realms of contracts and business dealings, as it provides a way for parties to delegate their contractual rights and responsibilities while freeing themselves from the original agreement.

What is a Deed of Assignment?

A deed of assignment is a legal document that facilitates the transfer of a specific right or benefit from one party (the assignor) to another (the assignee). This process allows the assignee to step into the assignor’s position, taking over both the rights and obligations under the original contract. In construction, this might occur when a main contractor assigns rights under a subcontract to the employer, allowing the employer to enforce specific subcontractor duties directly if the contractor fails.

Key aspects of an assignment include:

• Continuation of the Original Contract: The initial agreement remains valid and enforceable, despite the transfer of rights or benefits.
• Assumption of Rights and Obligations: The assignee assumes the role of the assignor, adopting all associated rights and responsibilities as outlined in the original contract.
• Requirement for Written Form: The assignment must be documented in writing, signed by the assignor, and officially communicated to the obligor (the party obligated under the contract).
• Subject to Terms and Law: The ability to assign rights or benefits is governed by the specific terms of the contract and relevant legal statutes.

At common law, parties generally have the right to assign their contractual rights without needing consent from the other party involved in the contract. However, this does not apply if the rights are inherently personal or if the contract includes an assignment clause that restricts or modifies this general right. Many contracts contain a provision requiring the consent of the other party for an assignment to occur, ensuring that rights are not transferred without the other party’s knowledge.

Once an assignment of rights is made, the assignee gains the right to benefit from the contract and can initiate legal proceedings to enforce these rights. This enforcement can be done either independently or alongside the assignor, depending on whether the assignment is legal or equitable. It’s important to note that while rights under the contract can be assigned, the contractual obligations or burdens cannot be transferred in this manner. Therefore, the assignor remains liable for any obligations under the contract that are not yet fulfilled at the time of the assignment.

Choosing Between Assignment and Novation in a Construction Contract

Choosing between a deed of novation and an assignment agreement depends on the specific circumstances and objectives of the parties involved in a contract. Both options serve to transfer rights and obligations but in fundamentally different ways, each with its own legal implications, risks, and benefits. Understanding these differences and considering various factors can help in making an informed decision that aligns with your goals.

The choice between assignment and novation in a construction project scenario, where, for instance, an employer wishes to engage a subcontractor directly due to loss of confidence in the main contractor, hinges on several factors. These are:

• Nature of the Contract:  The type of contract you’re dealing with (e.g., service, sales) can influence which option is more suitable. For instance, novation might be preferred for service contracts where obligations are personal and specific to the original parties.
• Parties Involved: Consent is a key factor. Novation requires the agreement of all original and new parties, making it a viable option only when such consent is attainable. Assignment might be more feasible if obtaining consent from all parties poses a challenge.
• Complexity of the Transaction: For transactions involving multiple parties and obligations, novation could be more appropriate as it ensures a clean transfer of all rights and obligations. Assignment might leave the original party with ongoing responsibilities.
• Time and Cost: Consider the practical aspects, such as the time and financial cost associated with each option. Novation typically involves more complex legal processes and might be more time-consuming and costly than an assignment.

If the intention is merely to transfer the rights of the subcontractor’s work to the employer without altering the subcontractor’s obligations under a contract, an assignment might suffice. However, if the goal is to completely transfer the main contractor’s contractual role and obligations to the employer or another entity, novation would be necessary, ensuring that all parties consent to this new arrangement and the original contractor is released from their obligations.

The legal interpretations and court decisions highlight the importance of the document’s substance over its label. Even if a document is titled a “Deed of Assignment,” it could function as a novation if it transfers obligations and responsibilities and involves the consent of all parties. The key is to clearly understand and define the objective behind changing the contractual relationships and to use a deed — assignment or novation — that best achieves the desired legal and practical outcomes, ensuring the continuity and successful completion of the construction project.

Understanding the distinction between assignment deeds and novation deeds is crucial for anyone involved in contractual agreements. Novation offers a clean slate by transferring both rights and obligations to a new party, requiring the consent of all involved. Assignment, conversely, allows for the transfer of contractual benefits without altering the original contract’s obligations. Each method serves different strategic purposes, from simplifying transitions to preserving original contractual duties. The choice between novation and assignment hinges on specific legal, financial, and practical considerations unique to each situation. At PBL Law Group, we specialise in providing comprehensive legal advice and support in contract law. Our team is dedicated to helping clients understand their options and make informed decisions that align with their legal and business objectives. Let’s discuss!

Authored By Raea Khan

Director Lawyer, PBL Law Group

Find what you need

Share this article, book a 15-min consultation​, rated 5-star by our clients, latest insights & practical guides.

How to Deal with a Disputed Progress Claim: Procedure Under the NSW Security of Payment Act

Navigating the complexities of construction payments can be daunting, especially

How to Describe Construction Works in Payment Claims and Schedules: Ensuring Security of Payment in Construction Contracts

In the construction industry, the adherence to the Security of

How to Remove Strata Committee Members: Guide for NSW Strata Body Corporate

In New South Wales, the dynamics of strata management are

Speak to us Now or Request a Consultation.

How can our expert lawyers help.

Property and strata disputes, building defects claims, setting up new Owners Corporations and more…

Construction & Building Law

Construction and building disputes, building defects, delays and claims, debt recovery and more…

International Estate Planning

Cross-border estate planning, international wills and trusts, tax-efficient wealth transfer strategies and more…

Commercial & Business Law

Starting and scaling your business, banking and business financing, bankruptcy and insolvency and more…

Planning & Environment Law

Environment and planning regulation, land and environment court disputes, sub-divisions and more…

Wills & Estates

Creating, updating and contesting wills, estate planning and administration, probate applications and more…

Get In Touch

Helpful links, site information, how we can help.

Copyright © 2024 PBL Law Group. All Rights Reserved

Thank You For Your Request.

We’ve received your consultation request and will contact you within the next 24 hours (excluding weekends).

Deed of Assignment

Understanding the Deed of Assignment

The Deed of Assignment is a legal document that transfers the rights and obligations of one party (the Assignor) to another party (the Assignee). This legal instrument is commonly used in various industries, including Law and Government. In the context of legal matters, the Deed of Assignment plays a crucial role in ensuring the proper transfer of legal rights and responsibilities between parties.

Key Elements of a Deed of Assignment

When drafting a Deed of Assignment, several key elements need to be included to make it valid and enforceable:

• Parties: Clearly identify the Assignor and Assignee with their complete legal names and contact information.
• Assignment Subject: Describe the rights, obligations, or property being transferred.
• Consideration: Specify any monetary or non-monetary consideration exchanged between the parties.
• Effective Date: State the date when the assignment becomes effective.
• Governing Law: Determine the jurisdiction and legal framework under which the Deed is governed.
• Signatures: Obtain the signatures of all parties involved, along with the date of signing.

The Importance of the Deed of Assignment

The Deed of Assignment holds significant importance in both legal and business contexts. It ensures transparency, clarity, and security while transferring rights or properties. By documenting the transfer process, the Deed of Assignment protects the interests of all parties involved and provides a legally binding agreement.

Practical Applications

1. real estate transactions.

In real estate, the Deed of Assignment is frequently utilized to transfer property ownership from the seller to the buyer. It serves as proof of the assignment and safeguards the buyer's rights over the property.

2. Intellectual Property

When a person or company wants to transfer the ownership of intellectual property, such as patents, trademarks, or copyrights, a Deed of Assignment becomes crucial. It outlines the transfer of these valuable assets and provides legal protection to the Assignee.

3. Debt Assignment

Debt Assignment allows one party to transfer their debt obligations to another party. This often occurs when companies sell their outstanding invoices or loans to a third party. The Deed of Assignment ensures a smooth transition and protects all parties involved.

4. Business Contracts

Within the realm of business contracts, a Deed of Assignment can play a significant role in the transfer of contractual rights and obligations. This can involve assigning rights to receive payments, transferring contractual benefits, or delegating responsibilities to another party.

Utilize Practical Law for Deed of Assignment Insights

For comprehensive and reliable information on Deed of Assignment, turn to Practical Law, a leading source for legal knowledge and insights. Practical Law offers a diverse range of resources, including expertly crafted templates, guides, and sample agreements, to help professionals navigate the intricacies of legal matters.

With Practical Law, you can gain a deeper understanding of the legal implications and practical considerations surrounding the Deed of Assignment. Stay informed, make well-informed decisions, and optimize your legal strategies with the guidance of industry-leading experts.

Unlock the power of Practical Law and enhance your knowledge on the Deed of Assignment today.

Professional Income Tax Software - GoSystem Tax RS

C-Track - Court Case Management System

Void ab initio - Practical Law

Search Office Locations - Denaro Anthony D Atty

What Attorneys Should Know About Reptile Theory

What GC Should Know About 4 Types of Intellectual Property

Bangalore Location

10 Ways to Celebrate Pride Month

Legal Systems in Australia: Overview - Practical Law

Internet Privacy Laws Revealed - How Your Personal Information is Protected Online

• Insights & events

Assigning debts and other contractual claims - not as easy as first thought

Harking back to law school, we had a thirst for new black letter law. Section 136 of the Law of the Property Act 1925 kindly obliged. This lays down the conditions which need to be satisfied for an effective legal assignment of a chose in action (such as a debt). We won’t bore you with the detail, but suffice to say that what’s important is that a legal assignment must be in writing and signed by the assignor, must be absolute (i.e. no conditions attached) and crucially that written notice of the assignment must be given to the debtor.

When assigning debts, it’s worth remembering that you can’t legally assign part of a debt – any attempt to do so will take effect as an equitable assignment. The main practical difference between a legal and an equitable assignment is that the assignor will need to be joined in any legal proceedings in relation to the assigned debt (e.g. an attempt to recover that part of the debt).

Recent cases which tell another story

Why bother telling you the above?  Aside from our delight in remembering the joys of debating the merits of legal and equitable assignments (ehem), it’s worth revisiting our textbooks in the context of three recent cases. Although at first blush the statutory conditions for a legal assignment seem quite straightforward, attempts to assign contractual claims such as debts continue to throw up legal disputes:

• In  Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp Europe Ltd v Euler Hermes Europe SA (NV) [2019] EWHC 2250 (Comm),  the High Court held that a performance bond issued under a construction contract was not effectively assigned despite the surety acknowledging a notice of assignment of the bond. Sadly, the notice of assignment failed to meet the requirements under the bond instrument that the assignee confirm its acceptance of a provision in the bond that required the employer to repay the surety in the event of an overpayment. This case highlights the importance of ensuring any purported assignment meets any conditions stipulated in the underlying documents.
• In  Promontoria (Henrico) Ltd v Melton [2019] EWHC 2243 (Ch) (26 June 2019) , the High Court held that an assignment of a facility agreement and legal charges was valid, even though the debt assigned had to be identified by considering external evidence. The deed of assignment in question listed the assets subject to assignment, but was illegible to the extent that the debtor’s name could not be deciphered. The court got comfortable that there had been an effective assignment, given the following factors: (i) the lender had notified the borrower of its intention to assign the loan to the assignee; (ii) following the assignment, the lender had made no demand for repayment; (iii) a manager of the assignee had given a statement that the loan had been assigned and the borrower had accepted in evidence that he was aware of the assignment. Fortunately for the assignee, a second notice of assignment - which was invalid because it contained an incorrect date of assignment - did not invalidate the earlier assignment, which was found to be effective. The court took a practical and commercial view of the circumstances, although we recommend ensuring that your assignment documents clearly reflect what the parties intend!
• Finally, in Nicoll v Promontoria (Ram 2) Ltd [2019] EWHC 2410 (Ch),  the High Court held that a notice of assignment of a debt given to a debtor was valid, even though the effective date of assignment stated in the notice could not be verified by the debtor. The case concerned a debt assigned by the Co-op Bank to Promontoria and a joint notice given by assignor and assignee to the debtor that the debt had been assigned “on and with effect from 29 July 2016”. A subsequent statutory demand served by Promontoria on the debtor for the outstanding sums was disputed on the basis that the notice of assignment was invalid because it contained an incorrect date of assignment. Whilst accepting that the documentation was incapable of verifying with certainty the date of assignment, the Court held that the joint notice clearly showed that both parties had agreed that an assignment had taken place and was valid. This decision suggests that mistakes as to the date of assignment in a notice of assignment may not necessarily be fatal, if it is otherwise clear that the debt has been assigned.

The conclusion from the above? Maybe it’s not quite as easy as first thought to get an assignment right. Make sure you follow all of the conditions for a legal assignment according to the underlying contract and ensure your assignment documentation is clear.

Contact our experts for further advice

Search our site

Understanding a deed of assignment for intellectual property

A deed of transfer is used to change the ownership of intellectual property, a common occurrence in business. Explore how and when to use one.

Find out more about intellectual property basics

by   Brette Sember, J.D.

Brette is a former attorney and has been a writer and editor for more than 25 years. She is the author of more than 4...

Read more...

Updated on: November 24, 2023 · 3 min read

Understanding intellectual property in business

How to transfer intellectual property rights in business, what to include in a deed of assignment, registering new ownership, restrictions on intellectual property transfers.

Most companies have intellectual property as part of their assets, including software, product design, or copyright to white papers. Buying or selling such property is done using a document called a deed of assignment.

A large part of what a business consists of may be tied to intellectual property . It's easy to see physical property a company owns, such as a building, office furniture, or inventory, but intellectual property can be more challenging to identify.

Most businesses have intellectual property, or works created by human minds or, in some cases, by computers. Some examples of intellectual property include architectural drawings, ad campaigns, company or product names, inventions, and source code.

Examples of when transfers of intellectual property might happen include when a company is buying another company, when you are setting up an LLC and want to transfer your intellectual property into the company, or when a business buys product rights from another company or individual.

A deed of assignment can be done in one transaction, instead of one transaction for each item of intellectual property, by transferring all ownership rights of all intellectual property detailed in the deed. The document is signed by both the buyer and seller. No payment is required for it to be valid.

A deed of assignment must be in writing and should include:

• The names and addresses of the assignor and assignee
• A description of the program or product for which the rights are being transferred
• A statement that all intellectual property rights to the property are being transferred
• Signatures of the parties and the date of the agreement execution

The deed could also include the following sections, where applicable:

• Consideration, or payment, to be made to the original owner.
• Warranties, or promises that the intellectual property rights being assigned don't infringe on anyone else's intellectual property rights . For example, in a deed regarding the transfer of a copyright, this section could state that the copyrighted work is original and not owned by someone else.
• Indemnification, or promise by the seller to reimburse the assignee if there is some problem with title to the property.
• Future assignments. For example, the agreement could be ongoing, so that anything the assignor creates in the future for this product or program is also transferred to the buyer.

Although a deed of assignment transfers ownership in intellectual property , it does not change the registration of the ownership. The assignee is responsible for handling all registration requirements.

For example, if a patent is transferred via a deed of assignment, the new owner must record the change in ownership with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Similarly, the transfer of a copyright is recorded with the U.S. Copyright Office.

Transfers of intellectual property must comply with U.S. laws. One obvious caveat is that you can't transfer property you don't own. Transfers must also comply with antitrust laws, which are set up to prevent one company from completely dominating an industry.

If intellectual property rights are being transferred overseas, the transfer must comply with Export Administration Regulations and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations , which are designed to protect national security and trade.

The deed of assignment can be a crucial part of a business deal or transaction. You can create a deed of assignment yourself, or you can work with an attorney .

You may also like

How to write a will: A comprehensive guide to will writing

Writing a will is one of the most important things you can do for yourself and for your loved ones, and it can be done in just minutes. Are you ready to get started?

May 17, 2024 · 11min read

What is a power of attorney (POA)? A comprehensive guide

Setting up a power of attorney to make your decisions when you can't is a smart thing to do because you never know when you'll need help from someone you trust.

May 7, 2024 · 15min read

• International

The Netherlands

Signed, sealed, delivered: execution of deeds and documents and how it might go wrong.

Published on 29th Sep 2016

After a series of long and complex negotiations, the document is finally agreed. Each party breathes a sigh of relief. But now the document must be validly executed – and this is where all the hard work in reaching agreement can be undone.

Below we answer ten questions that are commonly raised in relation to the execution of deeds and documents.

1. Can a contract be executed electronically?

Yes! English law lays down few formalities for the form of a contract and almost all simple contracts, even those which statute requires are “in writing” or “signed”, can be executed electronically. However, one point to bear in mind is whether the document will need to be filed with any authority or registry which may insist on a wet ink signature.

2. Can a deed be executed electronically?

Yes! The Law Society’s practice note  on the execution of a document using an electronic signature, which was published on 21 July 2016 and which represents the Law Society’s view of good practice in this area, has clarified that a deed can be executed electronically. At common law, a deed must be in writing, but there are a number of cases which have confirmed that an electronic representation of a document (for example, an exchange of emails) can satisfy this “in writing” requirement.

Commonly, deeds are executed on behalf of a company by a director of that company in the presence of a witness who attests the signature of the director. The Law Society’s practice note states that if that witness “genuinely observes” the director signing the deed using an electronic signature, and the witness then goes on to sign the adjacent attestation clause, the deed will have been validly executed. It is best practice for the witness to be physically present when the signatory signs the deed.

3. What has to be done to ensure that a deed is “delivered”?

One of the distinguishing factors about the execution of a deed as compared to a contract is that a deed must be “delivered”. Delivery fixes the date from which the executing party is bound by the deed, and once delivered, a deed is irrevocable in the absence of an express right of revocation. At common law, a deed is delivered when a party expresses an intention to be bound by the deed, even if it retains possession of the document.

The best way to deal with delivery of a deed is to have clear wording in the document setting out that the deed will be delivered on the date appearing at the head of the document. Where a deed is executed by a company, legislation provides that it is presumed to be delivered on execution, unless a contrary intention is proved. There is no such presumption for execution by an individual. Clear wording in the document confirming the position on delivery will avoid confusion and unintended consequences.

4. What date should be inserted into the deed?

Where a deed contains wording stating that it is executed and delivered on the date appearing at the head of the document, as recommended above, then a date should be inserted that is on or after the date that the last signatory signed. However, if the deed does not contain such wording, case law has held that the absence of a date will not affect its validity, which usually takes effect from delivery.

A deed may in certain circumstances be drafted for its provisions to take effect from a date before the date of its execution. If so, care is required. For example, in pensions, many deeds purporting to make, or to “confirm” amendments to a pension scheme made from a date prior to the date of execution and delivery of the deed have been found to be ineffective, due to statutory and case law restrictions on the power to amend a pension scheme retrospectively.

No deed or contract must ever be back dated (i.e. given a date that is earlier than the date it was executed). This is potentially fraudulent.

5. Who can be a witness to the signatory of a deed?

There is no statutory provision requiring a witness in these circumstances to be independent. However the purpose of having a witness is so that they can provide unbiased evidence of what was signed and by whom, if required in the future. Therefore a witness should be independent and it is best practice to interpret this widely.

A witness should not be the signatory’s spouse or partner or a family member, and should not have a personal interest in the provisions of the document. Case law has confirmed that a party to the document cannot act as a witness to another party’s signature. It is advisable that a witness is aged eighteen or over.

6. Do all parties have to sign the same document?

No. If the parties to an agreement do not intend to sign the same physical document, it is best practice to include a counterparts clause in the agreement which in effect creates more than one original document. However, omitting such a clause will not invalidate a document which is in fact signed in counterpart.

7. Do all parties have to use the same method of execution?

No. The parties to an agreement could validly execute a document using different methods; for example, one party signing electronically and a second using a wet ink signature. A composite version could then be created, either by using a print-out of the electronically signed page together with the wet ink signed pages, or by scanning the wet ink pages to add to the electronically signed page. If that document was later required to be produced in evidence, an English court would accept the composite version.

8. Can a company use pre-signed signature pages in the execution of a simple contract?

Yes. In February 2010, the Law Society published a practice note  on the execution of documents by virtual means, which represents its view of good practice. When executing a simple contract between two parties which are not physically present at the same meeting, it is acceptable to use pre-signed signature pages. When doing this, the signature page should clearly identify the document to which it relates. When the document is finalised, those organising the signing should email the final version of the document to each absent party (or their lawyers) and obtain confirmation from that party (or their lawyers) that they have agreed the final version, and that they authorise the pre-signed signature page to be attached to the final version and for the document to be dated and released.

9. Can one individual execute a document as both a director and the company secretary?

No. The Companies Act 2006 states that a provision requiring something to be done by a director and the company secretary is not satisfied by it being done by the same person acting both as director and secretary. The document could instead, though, be signed by the director in the presence of a witness.

10. What are the possible consequences of executing a document incorrectly?

The recent pensions case, Briggs v Gleeds , illustrates that the consequences can be severe. Gleeds was a partnership that operated a final salary pension scheme. Over a period of more than fifteen years from 1991, a number of deeds of amendment were executed making significant changes to the pension scheme, including closing the scheme to the future accrual of benefits.

It was later discovered that the partners’ signatures on these deeds had not been validly witnessed, as required under the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989. The additional liability for Gleeds to fund the scheme, owing to the deeds having been invalidly executed, was in the region of £45 million.

The High Court held that the deeds were not valid and had no effect. Arguments that the trustees and scheme members should be “estopped” from denying the validity of the deeds did not succeed. The case is, however, due to be appealed to the Court of Appeal on a number of points.

Failure to execute contracts properly is less commonly a problem than deeds. This is because fewer formalities must be complied with when executing a simple contract. Nevertheless, it is essential that both types of document are executed properly to ensure their validity and operation as intended. Whilst the Gleeds case is indicative of the current trend that the courts take a strict approach to observing formalities within the pensions context, the principles have wider application.

* This article is current as of the date of its publication and does not necessarily reflect the present state of the law or relevant regulation.

Connect with one of our experts

Sign up for our newsletter

Legal Notice

Assignments: why you need to serve a notice of assignment

It's the day of completion; security is taken, assignments are completed and funds move. Everyone breathes a sigh of relief. At this point, no-one wants to create unnecessary paperwork - not even the lawyers! Notices of assignment are, in some circumstances, optional. However, in other transactions they could be crucial to a lender's enforcement strategy. In the article below, we have given you the facts you need to consider when deciding whether or not you need to serve notice of assignment.

What issues are there with serving notice of assignment?

Assignments are useful tools for adding flexibility to banking transactions. They enable the transfer of one party's rights under a contract to a new party (for example, the right to receive an income stream or a debt) and allow security to be taken over intangible assets which might be unsuitable targets for a fixed charge. A lender's security net will often include assignments over contracts (such as insurance or material contracts), intellectual property rights, investments or receivables.

An assignment can be a legal assignment or an equitable assignment. If a legal assignment is required, the assignment must comply with a set of formalities set out in s136 of the Law of Property Act 1925, which include the requirement to give notice to the contract counterparty.

The main difference between legal and equitable assignments (other than the formalities required to create them) is that with a legal assignment, the assignee can usually bring an action against the contract counterparty in its own name following assignment. However, with an equitable assignment, the assignee will usually be required to join in proceedings with the assignor (unless the assignee has been granted specific powers to circumvent that). That may be problematic if the assignor is no longer available or interested in participating.

Why should we serve a notice of assignment?

The legal status of the assignment may affect the credit scoring that can be given to a particular class of assets. It may also affect a lender's ability to effect part of its exit strategy if that strategy requires the lender to be able to deal directly with the contract counterparty.

The case of General Nutrition Investment Company (GNIC) v Holland and Barrett International Ltd and another (H&B) provides an example of an equitable assignee being unable to deal directly with a contract counterparty as a result of a failure to provide a notice of assignment.

The case concerned the assignment of a trade mark licence to GNIC . The other party to the licence agreement was H&B. H&B had not received notice of the assignment. GNIC tried to terminate the licence agreement for breach by serving a notice of termination. H&B disputed the termination. By this point in time the original licensor had been dissolved and so was unable to assist.

At a hearing of preliminary issues, the High Court held that the notices of termination served by GNIC , as an equitable assignee, were invalid, because no notice of the assignment had been given to the licensee. Although only a High Court decision, this follows a Court of Appeal decision in the Warner Bros Records Inc v Rollgreen Ltd case, which was decided in the context of the attempt to exercise an option.

In both cases, an equitable assignee attempted to exercise a contractual right that would change the contractual relationship between the parties (i.e. by terminating the contractual relationship or exercising an option to extend the term of a licence). The judge in GNIC felt that "in each case, the counterparty (the recipient of the relevant notice) is entitled to see that the potential change in his contractual position is brought about by a person who is entitled, and whom he can see to be entitled, to bring about that change".

In a security context, this could hamper the ability of a lender to maximise the value of the secured assets but yet is a constraint that, in most transactions, could be easily avoided.

Why not serve notice?

Sometimes it's just not necessary or desirable. For example:

• If security is being taken over a large number of low value receivables or contracts, the time and cost involved in giving notice may be disproportionate to the additional value gained by obtaining a legal rather than an equitable assignment.
• If enforcement action were required, the equitable assignee typically has the option to join in the assignor to any proceedings (if it could not be waived by the court) and provision could be made in the assignment deed for the assignor to assist in such situations. Powers of attorney are also typically granted so that a lender can bring an action in the assignor's name.
• Enforcement is often not considered to be a significant issue given that the vast majority of assignees will never need to bring claims against the contract counterparty.

Care should however, be taken in all circumstances where the underlying contract contains a ban on assignment, as the contract counterparty would not have to recognise an assignment that is made in contravention of that ban. Furthermore, that contravention in itself may trigger termination and/or other rights in the assigned contract, that could affect the value of any underlying security.

What about acknowledgements of notices?

A simple acknowledgement of service of notice is simply evidence of the notice having been received. However, these documents often contain commitments or assurances by the contract counterparty which increase their value to the assignee.

Best practice for serving notice of assignment

Each transaction is different and the weighting given to each element of the security package will depend upon the nature of the debt and the borrower's business. The service of a notice of assignment may be a necessity or an optional extra. In each case, the question of whether to serve notice is best considered with your advisers at the start of a transaction to allow time for the lender's priorities to be highlighted to the borrowers and captured within the documents.

For further advice on serving notice of assignment please contact Kirsty Barnes or Catherine Phillips  from our Banking & Finance team.

• [email protected]
• T:  +44 (0)370 733 0605
• Download vCard for  Catherine Phillips

Related Insights & Resources

Gowling WLG updates

Sign up to receive our updates on the latest legal trends and developments that matter most to you.

Transferring contracts: assignment and novation explained

Whether it's due to internal restructuring or meeting commercial requirements like a business sale, many companies encounter the need to transfer contracts from one entity to another. However, it's important to note that this process is not as simple as replacing one party's name with another. In most cases, contracts can be legally transferred through one of two methods: assignment or novation.

Assignment:

An assignment of a contract involves transferring the rights (but not the obligations) of the outgoing party to the incoming party. Typically, an assignment doesn't require the consent or agreement of the other party involved in the contract (the continuing party), unless specifically stated in the terms of the relevant contract.

To effect an assignment, a deed is often executed by both the outgoing party and the incoming party. If the consent of the continuing party is necessary, it is usually convenient to include this consent in the deed and have the continuing party execute it as well.

An assignment does not relieve the outgoing party of its ongoing obligations to the continuing party under the contract. In order to protect the outgoing party against future breaches of contract by the incoming party, it is common for the assignment deed to include provisions where the incoming party:

• promises to the outgoing party that it will fulfil the outgoing party's contractual obligations after the assignment date; and
• provides indemnification to the outgoing party against any claims made by the continuing party for any failures by the incoming party to fulfil those obligations after the assignment.

Even if the consent of the continuing party is not required, for the assignment to have legal effect written notice of the assignment must be given to the continuing party. This written notice ensures that all parties involved are informed about the transfer.

Another method to transfer contracts is through novation. In legal terms, novation refers to the substitution of a new contract for an existing one, maintaining the same terms as the original contract, but between the continuing party and the incoming party instead of between the continuing party and the outgoing party. Unlike assignment, a novation transfers both the rights and obligations under the relevant contract from the outgoing party to the incoming party.

In practice, novation is commonly achieved by substituting the outgoing party with the incoming party. This means that, from the effective date of the novation, the incoming party assumes all the rights and obligations previously held by the outgoing party, and the continuing party releases the outgoing party from any further obligations under the contract.

It is important to note that the agreement of the continuing party is always required for a novation to be legally effective. While novation offers certain advantages over an assignment, such as a better legal liability position for the outgoing party, it can be more challenging to accomplish due to the necessity of securing the continuing party's agreement.

Similar to assignment, novation typically involves executing a deed of novation, which states the agreement of all parties to substitute the outgoing party with the incoming party.

Other methods:

In addition to novation and assignment, there are indirect methods available for transferring rights and obligations under a contract. For example, where a party to a contract is a company, it may be possible to transfer the company's rights and obligations under a contract by the shareholders of that company transferring their shares in the company to a third party. By doing so, the company remains a party to the contract, eliminating the need for assignment or novation. Instead, a new shareholder obtains control of the company and indirectly obtains the benefit of the rights, and the burden of the obligations, of the company under the contract.

Choosing the right transfer method

When faced with the need to transfer a contract, whether through assignment, novation, or an indirect method, it is important to consider several factors to determine the best option for your specific situation, including:

• The terms of the contract itself – examine the terms to identify any provisions that prohibit, allow, or impose conditions on the transfer of the contract. Understanding these contractual provisions will help determine the available options and any limitations associated with each method.
• Consider your ultimate goal in transferring the contract - evaluate which party should bear the responsibility for liability arising under the contract, both before and after the transfer. This assessment will help clarify which method of transfer aligns better with your desired outcomes.
• The commercial position of the parties - consider the commercial positions of the outgoing party, the continuing party, and the incoming party. Assess factors such as the willingness of the continuing party to provide consent for the transfer. Understanding the potential challenges or cooperation you may encounter from the relevant parties will assist in selecting the most viable transfer method.

By carefully evaluating these factors, you can make an informed decision on the most suitable transfer method for your specific circumstances.

For more information and to navigate the transfer process smoothly, please contact any member of the Sierra Legal team, whose contact details can be found here ( Link ).

Other articles you may be interested in

Navigating firb approval: a guide for foreign investors in australia, sophisticated investor regime: unveiling proposed changes, navigating the future: changes to the personal property security act, countdown to compliance: one week to adapt to australia’s new unfair contract terms regime, get in touch..

If you're looking to deal with a boutique commercial law firm that puts your needs first, contact Sierra Legal. We do what the big firms do but with a small, agile team that provides personalised service to each client. Get in touch today and talk about how Sierra Legal can meet your commercial and corporate legal needs. ‍ ‍

Melbourne. +61 3 9018 5665 [email protected] Level 5 North Tower 485 La Trobe Street Melbourne VIC 3000

Brisbane. +61 7 3102 9650 [email protected] Level 1   88 Tribune Street Brisbane QLD 4101

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation © Copyright Sierra Legal 2021

Website by Studio-Barrie

Assignment of debts - take care with cross-referencing

• Using your device

In the recent High Court decision in Nicoll -v- Promontoria (Ram 2) Ltd [2019] EWHC 2410 (Ch), the validity of an assignment of debts and the notice requirements is considered.

The High Court in this case considered whether a notice of assignment in relation to a debt, which mentioned an unverifiable date of assignment, was still valid and enforceable against the debtor. 

The debt in question originally arose between the debtor and the Co-operative Bank (Bank) and was evidenced in various facility letters between September 2010 and May 2013. A sum of over £10 million was advanced by the Bank to the debtor, and security was taken by the Bank in the form of charges over certain property. The overall balance was repayable by May 2015, but the debtor defaulted on the payment terms.

On 29 July 2016, the Bank assigned (or purported to assign) its debt and security to Promontoria. Both the Bank and Promontoria provided joint notice of the assignment in a single document to the debtor on 2 August 2016, with wording that the debt had been assigned ‘on and with effect from 29 July 2016’. There was no express reference to the date of the assignment or the assignment effective date, but rather this was defined by reference to the completion date in a related but unreferenced loan sale deed, so a more complicated analysis of a series of documents was required to reach the actual date of the assignment.

Promontoria proceeded to pursue the debtor for the debt by serving a statutory demand, dated 27 January 2017, and referred to the deed of assignment within its contents for payment of the outstanding debt.

The debtor’s attempt to have the statutory demand set aside was dismissed at the initial hearing, but the debtor received leave to appeal to the High Court on one issue. The debtor sought to challenge the effectiveness of the assignment of the debt based on an inability to work out from the notice of assignment whether the completion date for assignment had actually occurred. The debtor argued that:

• the case of WF Harrison -v- Burke [1956] 1 W.L.R. 419 is authority that a notice of assignment that gets the date of assignment wrong is invalid and, as a result, the assignment is not good against any debtor; and
• the date of assignment stated in the notice given to him was unverifiable, and therefore potentially wrong, rendering the notice invalid

The High Court agreed that the documentation disclosed by Promontoria to the debtor after the notice of assignment was insufficient to verify the date on which assignment had occurred, due to cross-referencing to other documents and there being conditions for completion. However, the High Court distinguished this case from WF Harrison -v- Burke case as the joint notice of assignment did not specify the date of the deed of assignment. It specified the date on which the assignment took effect, which is different. In WF Harrison -v- Burke , the notice of the assignment (given by the assignee only) specified the date of the assignment document (as opposed to the assignment itself) and got it wrong. In the present case, the notice of assignment was from both Promontoria and the Bank, i.e. assignor and assignee and made clear that the parties considered the assignment to be complete. In the circumstances, the debtor was not entitled to challenge Promontoria’s title to the debt.

The High Court accepted that while Promontoria had not produced evidence which in terms showed what the effective date of the assignment was, the joint notice clearly showed that both the Bank and Promontoria agreed and accepted that the assignment had taken place, and was sufficient evidence for the present purposes to be valid. The judge said: ‘The question is not whether Promontoria have provided a chain of proof through the wording of the documents. If that were the question then Promontoria would fail. The question is whether Promontoria has demonstrated that there is a completed assignment. I consider that it has. The crucial matter is the notice of assignment, against the background of the assignment document. The assignment documentation demonstrates a clear intention to assign even if the documents do not match up as they ought to. The notice of assignment provides clear evidence that the assignment has taken place.’ Accordingly, the High Court concluded that there was no arguable case that the assignment’s effective date had not occurred and considered that the assignment had been sufficiently demonstrated to be effective as against the debtor.

The High Court clearly held that a notice of assignment of a debt given to a debtor was valid, even though the assignment effective date, referred to in the notice, could not be verified by the debtor. The judgment provides strong support for the proposition that it is not open to debtors to seek to find alleged defects in any assignment, as long as they have been properly notified of the assignment and most importantly that the assignor and assignee both agree that the assignment is valid. This is a welcome decision for all creditors.

Dispute resolution

Related insights, hong kong’s court of appeal extends ‘guy lam principle’ to arbitration agreements in winding-up proceedings.

14 May 2024

In Re Guy Kwok Hung Lam [2023] HKCFA 9 (Guy Lam CFA), the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal dismissed a bankruptcy petitioner’s appeal and laid down a landmark principle that where the underlying...

Tightening reins on cryptocurrency and trading platforms: a recap on the past year in virtual asset regulation

23 April 2024

Nearly one year has passed since the implementation of the licensing regime for Virtual Asset Trading Platforms (“VATP”) by the Securities and Futures Commission (the “SFC”), which formally came...

Hill Dickinson welcomes new partner to growing Commercial Litigation team in London

26 March 2024

We're delighted to welcome commercial disputes partner Sarah Emerson to our London Dispute Resolution team.

Is an arbitration tribunal’s decision on illegality in conflict with public policy?

08 February 2024

Under the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609) of Hong Kong (“AO”), unless the relevant arbitration agreement expressly provides for application of the opt-in provisions in sections 5-7 of Schedule 2...

The Mainland Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (Reciprocal Enforcement) Ordinance came into effect on 29 January 2024

31 January 2024

The newly-implemented and much-anticipated Mainland Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (Reciprocal Enforcement) Ordinance (Cap. 645) ('Ordinance') is one of the cornerstones of the mutual legal

Fair trials, proving your case and uncontroverted expert evidence

18 December 2023

This was a relatively low-value personal injury claim which would not in normal circumstances have gone as far as the Supreme Court. However, it raised a point of general importance, with regard to th

We can help you resolve business disputes through negotiation, mediation, arbitration or litigation. Our aim is to achieve resolution quickly and efficiently and to minimise the impact of a dispute on your day-to-day operations.

Where possible, we try to settle disputes without recourse to legal proceedings. However, when this is unavoidable, our very experienced and tenacious team will vigorously pursue a strategy set to achieve a successful outcome for you.

Clients in manufacturing, service industries, retail plcs, owner-managed businesses, accountants and other professionals rely on our clear, pragmatic advice, expert technical analysis and sound understanding of their business problems and commercial objectives.

• Practical Law

Can the effective date of an assignment pre-date completion of the assignment?

Practical law resource id 3-522-0203  (approx. 3 pages), get full access to this document with a free trial.

Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.

About Practical Law

This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.

650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.

83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.

81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.

• Landlord and Tenant
• Conveyancing Procedure

Cookies on GOV.UK

We use some essential cookies to make this website work.

We’d like to set additional cookies to understand how you use GOV.UK, remember your settings and improve government services.

We also use cookies set by other sites to help us deliver content from their services.

You have accepted additional cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

You have rejected additional cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

beta This part of GOV.UK is being rebuilt – find out what beta means

Trusts, Settlements and Estates Manual

Tsem1845 - introduction to trusts: supplementary deeds: deed of assignment.

A person may accept entitlement under a trust then transfer it onto a specific trust. The transfer is by a deed of assignment. The terms of the new trust or Will may be different from those resulting from a surrender or release of the entitlement. TSEM1850 has details of deeds of surrender or release.

A deed of assignment cannot apply retrospectively. It is effective only from the date the deed is executed.

The person assigning an interest is a ‘settlor’ within Section 620(1) ITTOIA ( TSEM4120 ).

The following provisions may also apply

• Section 624 ITTOIA ( TSEM4200 )
• Section 629 ITTOIA ( TSEM4300 ).

Is this page useful?

• Yes this page is useful
• No this page is not useful

Help us improve GOV.UK

Don’t include personal or financial information like your National Insurance number or credit card details.

To help us improve GOV.UK, we’d like to know more about your visit today. Please fill in this survey (opens in a new tab) .

• Find a Lawyer
• Ask a Lawyer
• Research the Law
• Law Schools
• Laws & Regs
• Newsletters
• Justia Connect
• Pro Membership
• Basic Membership
• Justia Lawyer Directory
• Platinum Placements
• Gold Placements
• Justia Elevate
• Justia Amplify
• PPC Management
• Google Business Profile
• Social Media
• Justia Onward Blog

Effective Date of Agreement Contract Clauses (176)

Grouped into 7 collections of similar clauses from business contracts.

• Bankruptcy Lawyers
• Business Lawyers
• Criminal Lawyers
• Employment Lawyers
• Estate Planning Lawyers
• Family Lawyers
• Personal Injury Lawyers
• Estate Planning
• Personal Injury
• Business Formation
• Business Operations
• Intellectual Property
• International Trade
• Real Estate
• Financial Aid
• Course Outlines
• Law Journals
• US Constitution
• Regulations
• Supreme Court
• Circuit Courts
• District Courts
• Dockets & Filings
• State Constitutions
• State Codes
• State Case Law
• Legal Blogs
• Business Forms
• Product Recalls
• Justia Connect Membership
• Justia Premium Placements
• Justia Elevate (SEO, Websites)
• Justia Amplify (PPC, GBP)
• Testimonials

What Is a Deed of Novation and How Does It Affect My Business?

By Talia Admiraal Lawyer | Head of Social Ventures

Updated on November 15, 2023 Reading time: 5 minutes

This article meets our strict editorial principles. Our lawyers, experienced writers and legally trained editorial team put every effort into ensuring the information published on our website is accurate. We encourage you to seek independent legal advice. Learn more .

What is a Deed of Novation?

What does it include, deed vs assignment, how does it affect my business, signing a deed, key takeaways.

If you run a business, you may have heard about contracts being ‘novated’. If you need to change the details of your contract, you may need to use a deed of novation. This article will outline:

• what a deed of novation is;
• how they are used to transfer rights and obligations between parties;
• what a deed of novation generally includes; and
• other legal mechanisms that you may wish to consider.

A deed of novation t ransfer s one party’s rights and obligations contained within a contract to another third party.

While the terms of the original contract remain unchanged, the identity of one party is being substituted with a third party. The benefit of this for the other party is that their contract does not change. Instead, they are now simply dealing with a different entity.  

W hen a contract is novated, the new party now assumes all the legal responsibility under the contract. You must understand what liabilities or obligations you will either be passing on or assuming, as this can have significant consequences for your business.

For example, if your business is changing its name from ‘Tea and Teapots Pty Ltd’ to ‘Teapots ‘R Us Pty Ltd’, you will not need to make any contractual amendments. This is because the actual legal entity is not changing. 

However, if you are closing or selling your business, and wish to transfer your existing contracts and obligations to a third party, you will need a deed of novation to transfer these contracts.

A deed of novation is usually a straightforward document setting out the changes being made to the contract.

You would expect to see the following inclusions in a deed of novation:

• novation or effective date – the date from which the novation applies to the parties;
• release – a clause releasing the original party from all performance of the contract from the novation date;
• representations – any representations or warranties made by either party; and
• fees – any fees or payments to be made by either party.

Once you have determined that you need to transfer a contract from your business to another, you need to consider whether a deed is a correct approach.

An assignment is another useful tool when there is a change to the underlying contractual arrangements. Under an assignment, a party will transfer its contractual rights and benefits to another party. In addition, depending on the assignment clause within your contract, you may be able to assign your contractual rights to a third party without the original party needing to enter into the assignment.

Deciding which legal mechanism to use will depend on the type of transfer you are completing. 

For example, if another party is taking over your contractual rights and benefits, and there is no need to make a new contract, this should be an assignment. 

However, i n some circumstances, another party will be taking over your contractual risks, liabilities and obligations . Here, you should use a deed of novation and all parties need to consent to it.

Deciding which is right for you is entirely dependent on the particular circumstances regarding the changes to your contract. It is best to obtain clear legal advice on what approach you should take .

If you are a company director, complying with directors’ duties are core to adhering to corporate governance laws. This guide will help you understand the directors’ duties that apply to you within the Australian corporate law framework.

Entering into a deed of novation may be much simpler than terminating a contract and negotiating terms for a new contract. It simply requires transferring the risks, rights and obligations to a third party.

Entering into a deed of novation will affect your business by releasing you from your obligations under a contract and transferring those contractual rights to a new person or business. A deed of novation registers that new party’s acceptance of the original contract. The rights and obligations of the other party to the original contract do not change.

For example, if you are operating a business providing flower and chocolate products for delivery, and the chocolate arm of the business is taking up all your time and resources, you may wish to stop providing the flowers. However, you have a number of existing contracts in place with businesses to supply flowers. Here, rather than terminating these contracts, you can have another flower delivery company take over these contracts for you.

You must sign a deed in ‘wet ink’. This means that deeds cannot be electronically signed and must be signed by each party in pen and on paper. This signing must be accurately witnessed by someone who is not a party to the deed.

If you are selling your business or changing the way your business operates, you might wish to consider a deed of novation. A deed of novation is a simple and effective tool to assist you in transferring your rights and obligations to a third party. It is generally a straightforward and simple document setting out the changes to the details in the contract. If you need any assistance drafting a deed of novation, contact  LegalVision’s business lawyers  on 1300 544 755 or fill out the form on this page.

We appreciate your feedback – your submission has been successfully received.

Register for our free webinars

Sponsoring overseas workers for your hospitality business, safeguarding vulnerable clients: mandatory ndis & in-home aged care reporting, tips for sponsoring overseas workers for ndis and aged care, engaging contractors: latest employment law changes, contact us now.

Fill out the form and we will contact you within one business day

Related articles

You’re entering into a deed of novation – what to consider?

What Is the Difference Between Assignment and Novation?

What is the Difference Between an Agreement and a Deed?

How to Expand a Cleaning Business

We’re an award-winning law firm

2023 Fast Firms - Australasian Lawyer

2022 Law Firm of the Year - Australasian Law Awards

2021 Law Firm of the Year - Australasian Law Awards

2020 Excellence in Technology & Innovation Finalist - Australasian Law Awards

2020 Employer of Choice Winner - Australasian Lawyer

• Jun 9, 2021

Can I Transfer My Trademark? How?

This is one of the commonly asked questions by trademark owners about trademark. The answer is yes, a trademark is an intangible asset which can be transferred from one to another. The process is generally known as, assignment of trademark.

Section 64(1) of the Malaysian Trademarks Act 2019 ("Trademarks Act") provides that, a registered trademark shall be transmissible by assignment or assignment in the same way as other personal or movable property, and shall be so transmissible either in connection with the goodwill of a business or independently"

"Wait, does it mean only registered trademark can be assigned? What happened to unregistered trademark?"

Fret not, unregistered trademark can be assigned too! Section 64(6) of the Trademarks Act provides that, nothing in this Act shall be construed as affecting the assignment or other transmission of an unregistered trademark as part of the goodwill of a business. (Phew!)

How to assign a trademark ownership?

To kickstart the process, the original owner of the trademark ("Assignor") and the new owner of the trademark ("Assignee") should sign a deed of assignment, a legal instrument that transfer the trademark from the Assignor to the Assignee. One deed of assignment may include multiple trademarks. The deed of assignment contains the terms and condition to transfer the trademark. Generally, it should include the identity of parties, the details of trademark to be transferred, effective date of transfer, and the consideration, ie. the transfer price. The consideration may be a nominal sum.

Once the parties have signed the Deed of Assignment, the document should be filed with the Government Trademark Office, with the prescribed official form (Form TMH-1) and fees.

Upon filing the documents, the Malaysian Trademark Office will usually take a few months to record the assignment into the database of the registry.

Although it seems like may take some time, but the effective date of transfer of ownership is based on the date of deed of assignment, not the date of recordal by the Trademark Office. So the rights of the parties are not affected, despite the heavy workload in the Trademark Office.

Who should be responsible to file the assignment?

There are no hard and fast rules as to whether the deed of assignment and/or application for recordal of assignment should be done by the assignor or assignee. The parties may decide on a case-to-case basis.

International Assignment of Trademarks

Since registration and protection of trademark is territorial based, the recordal of trademark assignment will also be done country by country.

In some countries, a universal deed of assignment is acceptable. Hence the same document may be used to apply for recordal of trademark assignment in a few countries and save some legal fees in drafting a separate deed of assignment in each country.

However, in some countries, there are specific requirements on format or languages of the Deed of Assignment.

So, it is always safe not to assume and you should seek consultation from your trademark agent .

When is the best timing to assign trademark ownership?

There are many reasons that prompt the need of assignment of trademark. For example, sale of trademark, corporate restructure, moving a business from sole proprietorship to private limited company (Sdn. Bhd.) or vice versa & etc.

Once you have decided any of the above moves, the assignment of trademark should be done immediately without any delay.

There are many instances that the assignment of trademark has been delayed due to procrastination or overlook. This may lead to serious and unwanted consequences.

For instance, after a few years, upon realizing the need of doing the deed of assignment, if the assignor has ceased to operate or passed away (for individual assignor), this may complicate the process of recordal of assignment due to the difficulty in locating the assignor to sign the documents.

Another example is, there may be a problem when the assignee needs to take legal action against trademark infringer, as the legal ownership of the assignee on the trademark is questionable.

Looking for assigning the ownership of your trademark? Don't wait! Contact us today!

Written by,

Li Yen Seow

IP Legal Executive

Bachelor of Laws

Lawrence Tan

Registered Trademark, Patent and Design Agent

LL.B (HONS), CLP Advocate & Solicitor (Non-Practising)

Disclaimer: The above information is merely for general sharing and does not constitute any legal advice. Readers are advised to seek individual advice from the professionals.

Copyright reserved 2021 © IP Gennesis Sdn Bhd

Recent Posts

Can AI Be an Inventor of a Patent?

Brand Beacon: Navigating Trademark Protection for Financial Planners

开发 APP 必看！如何精准保护 APP 的知识产权？- 入门指南

Can the assignment of a patent be retroactively effective?

Article summary, access this content for free with a 7 day trial of lexisnexis and benefit from:.

• Instant clarification on points of law
• Smart search
• Workflow tools
• 41 practice areas

** Trials are provided to all LexisNexis content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these LexisNexis services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK, Ireland and selected UK overseas territories and Caribbean countries. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.

Get your quote today and take step closer to being able to benefit from:

• 36 practice areas

Get a LexisNexis quote

* denotes a required field

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in CONTINUE READING GET A QUOTE

Fieldfisher

Joshua is a solicitor in the Intellectual Property and Technology Protection and Enforcement team. He practices in all areas of intellectual property litigation including copyright, design, trademark and patent, primarily in proceedings issued in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court. In addition, and as part of reputation management, he also specialises in proceedings for libel, slander and malicious falsehood. Joshua works with a variety of high end to high street fashion designers and retailers, including household names, assisting in the protection of their intellectual property rights in the market. He also works with an array of commercial entities in various sectors assisting in the protection and enforcement of their key brands, trademarks and product technologies. Finally, he advises both individuals and businesses in the protection of their reputations in the media and online.

Related legal acts:

• Patents Act 1977 (1977 c 37)

Key definition:

Assignment definition, what does assignment mean.

An assignment is 'an immediate transfer of an existing proprietary right, vested or contingent from one party to another'. Assignments can occur by consent or by operation of law.

Popular documents

Virgin atlantic airways ltd v zodiac seats uk ltd—res judicata and cause of action estoppel.

IP & IT analysis: How will the court approach applying the principles of res judicata and cause of action estoppel? The implications of the recent Supreme Court decision in Virgin Atlantic Airways v Zodiac Seats UK are considered by Gordon Harris, head of intellectual property at Wragge & Co, who

US, EPO and UK approaches to patenting software

US, EPO and UK approaches to patenting softwareSTOP PRESS—Impact of the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023: This document contains references to retained EU law (REUL) and associated terms introduced by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 in connection with Brexit. From 1 January

Can the assignment of a patent be retroactively effective?A patent or patent application is personal property that can be assigned (section 30(1) and (2) of the Patents Act 1977 (PA 1977)). In order to be effective, any assignment of patents or patent applications must be in writing and signed on

Patent term, renewal and restoration

Patent term, renewal and restorationThis Practice Note explains how long a patent lasts, how it must be maintained by renewal in order to last that long and how to restore a patent that has lapsed or will soon lapse.Obtaining a patent in the UKThere are two types of patents available in the UK:•UK

0330 161 1234

• International Sales(Includes Middle East)
• Latin America and the Caribbean
• Netherlands
• New Zealand
• Philippines
• South Africa
• Switzerland
• United States

Popular Links

• Supplier Payment Terms
• Partner Alliance Programme

HELP & SUPPORT

• Legal Help and Support
• Tolley Tax Help and Support

LEGAL SOLUTIONS

• Compliance and Risk
• Forms and Documents
• Legal Drafting
• Legal Research
• Magazines and Journals
• News and Media Analysis
• Practice Management
• Privacy Policy
• Cookie Settings
• Terms & Conditions
• Data Protection Inquiry
• Protecting Human Rights: Our Modern Slavery Agreement

100 Harris St, Pyrmont

24/7 Customer Support

You can call us 24/7 for urgent matters

Legal Requirements for a Deed of Assignment

Home > Uncategorized > Legal Requirements for a Deed of Assignment

• April 19, 2023

If you're involved in the transfer of contractual rights and obligations, a deed of assignment can be an essential legal document . It provides a framework for transferring your rights or taking over someone else's. But creating a valid deed of assignment involves more than just filling out a form. To ensure your deed of assignment is legally enforceable, it's crucial to understand the legal requirements and considerations involved. In this article, we'll guide you through the key legal requirements and considerations when drafting and executing a deed of assignment.

Table of Contents

Key Legal Requirements

Written agreement.

One of the essential legal requirements for a valid deed of assignment is that it must be in writing. The written agreement must clearly state the intentions of both parties and the terms of the transfer. A written agreement helps to avoid any misunderstandings or disputes that may arise in the future.

A written deed of assignment should include the following details:

• The date when the deed of assignment was executed
• The names and addresses of the parties involved
• A description of the property or right being assigned
• The consideration or payment for the assignment
• Any terms or conditions of the assignment

Signature of the Parties

Another crucial legal requirement for a valid deed of assignment is that it must be signed by all parties involved in the transfer. The signatures of the parties show their agreement to the terms and conditions of the transfer. If any party does not sign the deed of assignment, it will not be valid.

It is essential to ensure that the signatures are witnessed by an independent third party. The witness should be a person who is not a party to the deed and is over 18 years of age. The witness must sign the deed as well, and their name and address should be recorded in the deed of assignment.

Notice to the Other Party

In some cases, a deed of assignment may affect the rights of another party who was not involved in the original contract . In such cases, it is essential to provide notice to the other party before executing the deed of assignment.

The notice should include the following details:

• The date of the deed of assignment

The notice should be sent to the other party using a method that provides proof of delivery, such as registered mail or courier service.

Compliance with Local Laws and Regulations

 related content: step-by-step guide to drafting deed of assignment, legal considerations, properly identifying parties and rights.

One of the key legal considerations when creating a deed of assignment is properly identifying the parties and the rights involved. The validity and enforceability of the assignment hinge on accurately identifying the original parties, as well as those who will assume the obligations and benefits under the assignment. It’s also important to clearly define the rights being assigned, including any limitations or conditions. Failure to properly identify the parties or rights could lead to legal disputes and financial losses. It’s crucial to seek legal advice to ensure the parties and rights are accurately identified to avoid any legal issues.

 Related Content: Benefits of a Deed of Assignment

Seeking Legal Advice

It’s crucial to seek legal advice when drafting a deed of assignment. A legal professional can guide you through the process, ensuring compliance with legal requirements and accurately identifying the involved parties and their rights. With their expertise, you can avoid potential legal disputes and financial losses arising from an invalid or unenforceable assignment. They can also provide valuable advice on other legal considerations related to the assignment. Seeking legal advice is vital to ensure a legally valid, enforceable, and compliant deed of assignment. 

In conclusion, a valid deed of assignment requires a written agreement, the signatures of all relevant parties, notice to the other party, and compliance with local laws and regulations. It is also important to accurately identify the parties and rights involved and seek legal advice if needed. By following these legal requirements and considerations, homeowners and other parties can ensure a smooth and successful transfer of rights. 

Related Articles

In the bustling world of construction, particularly in New South Wales (NSW), the role of an owner-builder is becoming increasingly popular. This unique position allows individuals to take the reins on their construction projects, adding a personal touch and potentially cutting costs. However, the key to a successful build is not just about managing budgets and timelines but mastering the art of communication with contractors and suppliers. In this article, we delve into effective communication strategies tailored specifically for NSW owner-builders, ensuring your project runs smoothly from start to finish.

Embarking on an owner-builder project in New South Wales is a unique adventure that combines creativity, control, and the thrill of constructing your own home. This guide is designed to arm you with the essential tools and knowledge to create a comprehensive project timeline that not only adheres to local regulations but also ensures your construction journey is as smooth and efficient as possible. Whether you’re laying down the initial plans or gearing up for the build, understanding how to effectively schedule your project is crucial.

In the bustling world of home construction in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, more and more individuals are stepping into the shoes of owner-builders. This choice empowers them with direct oversight over their building projects, offering potential savings and a highly personalised approach. However, this role also comes with its fair share of challenges, particularly when it comes to project management. Given the complex web of regulations and the demanding nature of construction tasks, leveraging the best project management software is not just a convenience—it’s a necessity. This article delves into how these tools can streamline the process, ensuring projects not only meet but exceed expectations.

Send us a message. We’d love to hear from you.​

If you’re a homeowner in New South Wales, it’s crucial to understand Construction Law to protect your investment. This ultimate guide to Construction Law is specifically designed to provide homeowners with essential insights into the legal landscape of home building in NSW.

Send us a message. We'd love to hear from you.​

You can be confident that you are getting the right legal advice., working hours.

   • 8am - 8pm Monday to Friday    • Phone until 18:00 hrs    • Friday - 8:00-18:00

Our Address Location

   • 100 Harris St, Pyrmont, NSW 2009, Australia    • You can contact us 24/7 for urgent matters    • Email: [email protected]

Construction Lawyers Sydney  |  Contract Lawyers Sydney

Thank you for downloading our Free Letter Template. We hope it helps you with your project!

The Federal Register

The daily journal of the united states government, request access.

Due to aggressive automated scraping of FederalRegister.gov and eCFR.gov, programmatic access to these sites is limited to access to our extensive developer APIs.

If you are human user receiving this message, we can add your IP address to a set of IPs that can access FederalRegister.gov & eCFR.gov; complete the CAPTCHA (bot test) below and click "Request Access". This process will be necessary for each IP address you wish to access the site from, requests are valid for approximately one quarter (three months) after which the process may need to be repeated.

An official website of the United States government.

If you want to request a wider IP range, first request access for your current IP, and then use the "Site Feedback" button found in the lower left-hand side to make the request.