- Getting started with Fortran
- Advanced array sections: subscript triplets and vector subscripts
- Allocatable arrays
- Array constructors
- Array nature specification: rank and shape
- Array operations
- Basic notation
- Whole arrays, array elements and array sections
- C interoperability
- Execution Control
- Explicit and implicit interfaces
- Intrinsic procedures
- Modern alternatives to historical features
- Object Oriented Programming
- Procedures - Functions and Subroutines
- Program units and file layout
- Source file extensions (.f, .f90, .f95, ...) and how they are related to the compiler.
- Usage of Modules
Fortran Arrays Allocatable arrays
Fastest entity framework extensions.
Arrays can have the allocatable attribute:
This declares the variable but does not allocate any space for it.
Once a variable is no longer needed, it can be deallocated :
If for some reason an allocate statement fails, the program will stop. This can be prevented if the status is checked via the stat keyword:
The deallocate statement has stat keyword too:
status is an integer variable whose value is 0 if the allocation or deallocation was successful.
Got any Fortran Question?
- Advertise with us
- Cookie Policy
- Privacy Policy
Get monthly updates about new articles, cheatsheets, and tricks.
Arrays and strings #
More often than not, we need to store and operate on long lists of numbers as opposed to just the single scalar variables that we have been using so far; in computer programming such lists are called arrays .
Arrays are multidimensional variables that contain more than one value where each value is accessed using one or more indices.
Arrays in Fortran are one-based by default; this means that the first element along any dimension is at index 1.
Array declaration #
We can declare arrays of any type. There are two common notations for declaring array variables: using the dimension attribute or by appending the array dimensions in parentheses to the variable name.
Example: static array declaration
Array slicing #
A powerful feature of the Fortran language is its built-in support for array operations; we can perform operations on all or part of an array using array slicing notation:
Example: array slicing
Fortran arrays are stored in column-major order; the first index varies fastest.
Allocatable (dynamic) arrays #
So far we have specified the size of our array in our program code—this type of array is known as a static array since its size is fixed when we compile our program.
Quite often, we do not know how big our array needs to be until we run our program, for example, if we are reading data from a file of unknown size.
For this problem, we need allocatable arrays. These are allocated while the program is running once we know how big the array needs to be.
Example: allocatable arrays
Allocatable local arrays are deallocated automatically when they go out of scope.
Character strings #
Example: static character string
Example: allocatable character string
Array of strings #
An array of strings can be expressed in Fortran as an array of character variables. All elements in a character array have equal length. However, strings of varying lengths can be provided as input to the array constructor, as shown in the example below. They will be truncated or right-padded with spaces if they are longer or shorter, respectively, than the declared length of the character array. Finally, we use the intrinsic function trim to remove any excess spaces when printing the values to the standard output.
Example: string array
Fortran allocatable array
Previously ,I always thinking that a(:) is a suger as a(1:size(a)) but this expmple confuesd me
It is a part of standand,and even for 2d array,
It is hard for boundary check if using allocatable array.
I think this different shape array assignment should be reject.
A conforming program shall not have the mismatch in shape in intrinsic assignment, the likes of which are shown in the original post.
The onus to conform is placed on the program writer.
a(:) is definitely equivalent a(1:size(a)) (well actually to a(lbound(a):ubound(a)) , but let’s consider here that the lower bound is 1), and will behave exactly the same if the code is standard-conforming .
Assigning an array (or an array sections) to an array section with a size mismatch is not standard conforming and the behavior is undefined. Ideally we would like the compiler to catch non-confirming code at compile time, but it’s not always possible and it depends on how the array sections are written.
If a is a static array
In the 3rd case the upper bound of the array section is an expression, which is evaluated only at run-time. So at compile time the mismatch cannot be detected. One may argue that on this example it would be fairly easy for the compiler to evaluate the expression at compile time, and that would be true. However where’s the limit? For more complex expressions at some point the compiler would have to actually run the code to be able to evaluate them. So in practice expressions are not evaluated at compile time.
If a is allocatable this is even worse. For instance the size of a(:) is not know at compile time.
With an explicit-shape array, it’s more an aspect of the quality of implementation whether a processor detects and reports the shape mismatch at compile-time. I suspect most compilers do so.
It is a dangerous UB. Previously ,I think It can checked at runtime , and a(1:size(a))=[1,2,3] should calculate size(a) firstly. But I am not familiar with complier,may it is hard to check.
By default, compilers do not check many things at runtime, as they are not required to and as it could hurt the performances. However they have compilation options that can enable many runtime checks (still, not all errors are detected). This is mostly useful for debugging.
Related Topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37 | 3244 | February 21, 2022 | ||
| Help | 11 | 476 | December 19, 2023 | |
| Help | 19 | 1273 | June 13, 2020 | |
| Help | 2 | 401 | October 20, 2021 | |
| Language enhancement | 2 | 695 | January 9, 2022 |
- Stack Overflow Public questions & answers
- Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers
- Talent Build your employer brand
- Advertising Reach developers & technologists worldwide
- Labs The future of collective knowledge sharing
- About the company
Collectives™ on Stack Overflow
Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most.
Q&A for work
Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.
Get early access and see previews of new features.
Fortran function returning allocatable array
Let me consider a function returning an allocatable array. Should the array variable holding the result (outside the function) be allocated before an assignment?
Consider, e.g., the following program
According to this , and this , the array res allocated for the result of get_matrix is deallocated as soon as it goes out of scope.
Would an assignment to a non-allocated variable w in the main program prolong the scope of the result of get_matrix ? In other words, if I omit allocate(w(2,2)) in the main program, do I get an undefined behavior?
Omitting allocate(w(2,2)) and compiling with gfortran 9.2.0 and options -Wall -std=f2008 gives following warnings
However, running the program with valgrind , as well as compiling with -fbounds-check , -fsanitize=address , or -fsanitize=leak does not give any error. Furthermore, the instruction deallocate(w) at the end does not crash the program, suggesting that w contains the memory allocated by get_matrix and, hence, one does not need to allocate w in the main program.
At the same time, including allocate(w(2,2)) in the code suppresses the compiler warning. Despite having the impression that the same memory is allocated twice, valgrind does not report a memory leak and, in fact, reports exactly the same memory usage.
What is the correct way to store an allocatable array as result of a function? Is it necessary to allocate w before storing in it the result of get_matrix ?
- allocatable-array
Your Answer
Reminder: Answers generated by artificial intelligence tools are not allowed on Stack Overflow. Learn more
Sign up or log in
Post as a guest.
Required, but never shown
By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy .
Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged function fortran allocatable-array or ask your own question .
- Featured on Meta
- Upcoming sign-up experiments related to tags
- The return of Staging Ground to Stack Overflow
- The 2024 Developer Survey Is Live
- Policy: Generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT) is banned
Hot Network Questions
- I have an active multiple-entry C1 US visa. I also have a Canadian citizenship certificate. Need to travel (not transit) US in 20 days. My options?
- How to add map to empty map frame in print layout of QGIS?
- Intercept significant, but confidence intervals around its standardized β include 0
- In Northern England, what vowel phoneme is used in “can’t”?
- How fast can you win this (very stupid) game?
- Relevance of RFC2228
- Going around in circles
- Article that plagiarized our paper is still available and gets cited - what to do?
- Story featuring an alien with an exotic sensorium (sonar?) that helps solve a murder
- What is the difference between Blob.valueOf and EncodeUtil.base64Decode?
- How much time is needed to judge an Earth-like planet to be safe?
- Bibliographic references: “[19,31-33]”, “[33,19,31,32]” or “[33], [19], [31], [32]”?
- Using Roy's Lemma and Walras' Law shows that
- Rank of a matrix with trace and determinant zero.
- Euro2024-inspired scoring problem
- Movie with a gate guarded by two statues
- Would killing 444 billion humans leave any physical impact on Earth that's measurable?
- How can I keep my writing consistent?
- Horror movie that has a demon hand coming through a mirror
- Create sublists whose totals exceed a certain threshold and that are as short as possible
- Why does crossfading audio files in ffmpeg produce just the last input?
- How many six-digit numbers are there where the third digit is equal to the second last digit, ...
- Wrappers around write() and read() and and a function to copy file permissions
- In "Romeo and Juliet", why is Juliet the "sun"?
Success! Subscription added.
Success! Subscription removed.
Sorry, you must verify to complete this action. Please click the verification link in your email. You may re-send via your profile .
- Intel Community
- Developer Software Forums
- Software Development Tools
- Intel® Fortran Compiler
Problem with overloaded assignment when LHS is allocatable array
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Report Inappropriate Content
View solution in original post
- All forum topics
- Previous topic
Link Copied
Community support is provided during standard business hours (Monday to Friday 7AM - 5PM PST). Other contact methods are available here .
Intel does not verify all solutions, including but not limited to any file transfers that may appear in this community. Accordingly, Intel disclaims all express and implied warranties, including without limitation, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement, as well as any warranty arising from course of performance, course of dealing, or usage in trade.
For more complete information about compiler optimizations, see our Optimization Notice .
- ©Intel Corporation
- Terms of Use
- *Trademarks
- Supply Chain Transparency
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Allocatable Arrays#. The allocatable attribute provides a safe way for memory handling. In comparison to variables with pointer attribute the memory is managed automatically and will be deallocated automatically once the variable goes out-of-scope. Using allocatable variables removes the possibility to create memory leaks in an application.. They can be used in subroutines to create scratch or ...
array(:) = (/1,2,3/) In this case, array (if allocatable) must be allocated, of rank 1 and of size 3 for the assignment statement to be valid. This is as would be under a Fortran 90 interpretation of the assignment with the whole array array=(/1,2,3/). The reason for this is that with the array section of this footnote, the left-hand side is ...
Arrays can have the allocatable attribute:! One dimensional allocatable array integer, dimension(:), allocatable :: foo ! Two dimensional allocatable array real, dimension(:,:), allocatable :: bar This declares the variable but does not allocate any space for it.! We can specify the bounds as usual allocate(foo(3:5)) !
If I uncomment the ALLOCATE (finishing (1)) statement it seems to work. But distinguishing between an array that is not allocated versus an array that is allocated to the wrong size seems a bit of a picky requirement for the feature. The code above also seems to work if I make starting explicit shape (ie. INTEGER :: STARTING (10) and delete the ...
Arrays are a central object in Fortran. The creation of dynamic sized arrays is discussed in the allocatable arrays section. To pass arrays to procedures four ways are available. The preferred way to pass arrays to procedures is as assumed-shape arrays. Higher-dimensional arrays can be passed in a similar way.
Statement and Attribute: Specifies that an object is allocatable. The shape of an allocatable array is determined when an ALLOCATE statement is executed, dynamically allocating space for the array. A character object may have a deferred length that is determined when the object is allocated with an ALLOCATE statement. A allocatable scalar object of any type may be allocated with an ALLOCATE ...
Allocatable arrays. A deferred-shape array that has the ALLOCATABLE attribute is referred to as an allocatable array. Determination of the bounds and shape of the array occurs when you allocate storage using an ALLOCATE statement. Example of an allocatable array. INTEGER, ALLOCATABLE, DIMENSION (:,:,:) :: A ALLOCATE (A (10,-4:5,20)) !
Fortran : High-performance parallel programming language. Allocatable (dynamic) arrays#. So far we have specified the size of our array in our program code—this type of array is known as a static array since its size is fixed when we compile our program.. Quite often, we do not know how big our array needs to be until we run our program, for example, if we are reading data from a file of ...
ALLOCATABLE (Fortran 2003) Purpose. The ALLOCATABLE attribute allows you to declare an allocatable object. You can dynamically allocate the storage space of these objects by executing an ALLOCATE statement or by a derived-type assignment statement. If the object is an array ...
I want to define a derived type PM consisting of an integer array ng(n1,n2) and a double vector zg(n3). I wrote:TYPE PM. INTEGER,ALLOCATABLE::ng(:,:) DOUBLE PRECISION,ALLOCATABLE::zg(:) END TYPE PM. n1, n2 and n3 are defined run time. Then I finally want to allocate an array PMA with n4 of PM derived types. n4 is defined at run time.
A function returning an automatic array is more flexible, because in the caller, an array need not be allocatable to be set to the function result, although with allocation upon assignment, it can be. I use functions with an allocatable result when the size of the result does not trivially depend on the arguments.
The code you posted does not compile - the syntax for the DO loop is incorrect. It's also incomplete. I corrected this and added code to view the bounds and can see that array B has bounds 3:4. xlf is correct here - the bounds of the expression a(3:4) are 1:2. You can see this with the following test: [fortran]real a(4) real, allocatable :: b ...
Assigning an array (or an array sections) to an array section with a size mismatch is not standard conforming and the behavior is undefined. Ideally we would like the compiler to catch non-confirming code at compile time, but it's not always possible and it depends on how the array sections are written. If a is a static array
The feature enhancements in Intel Fortran compiler 17.0 or later include support of specifying ASSUME_ALIGNED directive at point of use for an allocatable array or pointer. In the new syntax user must specify which array element is aligned. For above example, user can specify the alignment of A, B and C prior to the loop as:
This is what the documentation (link given in #2) says: Option standard-realloc-lhs (the default), tells the compiler that when the left-hand side of an assignment is an allocatable object, it should be reallocated to the shape of the right-hand side of the assignment before the assignment occurs. This is the current Fortran Standard definition. This feature may cause extra overhead at run time.
2. It is informally called (..... wait for it .....) (re-)allocation on assignment. The specific language from the Fortran 2003 standard using variable=expr. "If variable is an allocated allocatable variable, it is deallocated if expr is an array of different shape or any of the corresponding length type parameter values of variable and expr ...
That is, there is no special consideration required for assigning from a function with allocatable result. (The function result must, of course, be allocated, but that's a different point.) In the case of the question, the usual intrinsic assignment rules apply. In particular, we don't need to allocate w before the assignment.
Assignment to Allocatable Array. 07-21-2009 03:00 AM. Alt = pack (Fxd, Fxd .NE. 0) According to Metcalf et al. Fortran 95/2003 PP. 298, the direct assignment to an allocatable array (Alt) is possible due to an extension in Fortran 95 standards (Ch. 12). I am using Intel Fortran Compiler Ver. 10.1.021 on MSXP SP3.
In this case, the standard essentially places the onus on the program (and by extension its author) to conform, the processor (compiler being part of it) is not required to issue diagnostics. And the issue is this: with the defined assignment as specified, the standard semantics requires the 'ialloc` to be allocated to the right shape prior to ...