blockchain in supply chain management research paper

• Distributed Computing

Blockchain Technology for Supply Chain Management

• January 2022
• In book: Industrial Engineering in the Internet-of-Things World (pp.203-217)

• Informatics and Information Security Research Center
• This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.

Discover the world's research

• 25+ million members
• 160+ million publication pages
• 2.3+ billion citations

Supplementary resource (1)

• Int J Min Reclamat Environ

• John Adebisi

• Nebojša Zorić

• Gurpreet Kour Sodhi
• Mekhla Sharma
• Rajan Miglani
• Sarthak Bhagwatkar
• Deepti Gupta
• Pratik Satale
• Savita Adhav
• Ayush Turakhia
• Chirag Date
• Chris Correia
• Parikshit Mahalle
• Sanmitra Suryawanshi
• Shamla Mantri
• Vijay Suryawanshi
• Saurav Bhise
• Ashish Khanna
• Yogesh Sharma
• Devansh Singh
• Tarun Kumar
• Ihor Shlionchak
• Anatoliy Soltus

• Daria Podmetina

• J SUPERCOMPUT
• Mirna Magdy

• Jukka Hallikas

• INT J PROD RES

• INT J INFORM MANAGE

• Erik Hofmann
• Urs Magnus Strewe

• J OPER RES SOC
• Martin Christopher

• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Blockchain technologies in logistics and supply chain management: a bibliometric review.

1. Introduction

2. literature reviews on blockchain in logistics and scm, 3. methodology, 3.1. data collection, 3.2. research method, 3.2.1. quantitative analysis, 3.2.2. network analysis, 4. results of quantitative analysis, 4.1. destribution of publications by year and source, 4.2. scholars’ influence and institution statistics, 4.3. analysis of keywords and citations, 5. findings from network analysis and discussion, 5.1. bibliographic coupling network, 5.1.1. blockchain for supply chain sustainability, 5.1.2. conceptual development of blockchain research in the field of logistics and scm, 5.1.3. adoption triggers and barriers of blockchain technology in supply chains, 5.1.4. blockchain as an enabler for supply chain agility and adaptability, 5.1.5. blockchain for the protection of intellectual property, 5.1.6. blockchain for the management of food/perishable supply chains, 5.2. keyword co-occurrence network analysis, 5.2.1. blockchain fundamentals and technical aspects, 5.2.2. blockchain for digitally-enabled supply chains and trust mechanisms, 5.2.3. the combination of blockchain with industry 4.0 technologies, 5.2.4. blockchain for traceable and sustainable supply chains, 5.2.5. barriers to blockchain adoption, 6. discussion, 6.1. theoretical contributions, 6.2. managerial contributions, 6.3. study limitations, 7. conclusions, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

• Attaran, M. Digital Technology Enablers and Their Implications for Supply Chain Management. Supply Chain Forum 2020 , 21 , 158–172. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cooper, M.C.; Lambert, D.M.; Pagh, J.D. Supply Chain Management: More than a New Name for Logistics. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 1997 , 8 , 1–14. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Robertson, P.W.; Gibson, P.R.; Flanagan, J.T. Strategic Supply Chain Development by Integration of Key Global Logistical Process Linkages. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2002 , 40 , 4021–4040. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bode, C.; Wagner, S.M. Structural Drivers of Upstream Supply Chain Complexity and the Frequency of Supply Chain Disruptions. J. Oper. Manag. 2015 , 36 , 215–228. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Manupati, V.K.; Schoenherr, T.; Ramkumar, M.; Wagner, S.M.; Pabba, S.K.; Singh, R.I.R. A Blockchain-Based Approach for a Multi-Echelon Sustainable Supply Chain. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020 , 58 , 2222–2241. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Saberi, S.; Kouhizadeh, M.; Sarkis, J.; Shen, L. Blockchain Technology and Its Relationships to Sustainable Supply Chain Management. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019 , 57 , 2117–2135. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Treiblmaier, H. Combining Blockchain Technology and the Physical Internet to Achieve Triple Bottom Line Sustainability: A Comprehensive Research Agenda for Modern Logistics and Supply Chain Management. Logistics 2019 , 3 , 10. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Choi, T.-M.; Feng, L.; Li, R. Information Disclosure Structure in Supply Chains with Rental Service Platforms in the Blockchain Technology Era. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020 , 221 , 107473. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hald, K.S.; Kinra, A. How the Blockchain Enables and Constrains Supply Chain Performance. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2019 , 49 , 376–397. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tehrani, M.; Gupta, S.M. Designing a Sustainable Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Uncertainty and Various Capacity Levels. Logistics 2021 , 5 , 20. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bettis, R.A.; Mahajan, V. Risk/Return Performance of Diversified Firms. Manag. Sci. 1985 , 31 , 785–799. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kshetri, N. 1 Blockchain’s Roles in Meeting Key Supply Chain Management Objectives. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2018 , 39 , 80–89. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Zhang, H.; Nakamura, T.; Sakurai, K. Security and Trust Issues on Digital Supply Chain. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, Intl Conf on Cloud and Big Data Computing, Intl Conf on Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/CyberSciTech), Fukuoka, Japan, 5–8 August 2019; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 338–343. [ Google Scholar ]
• Baralla, G.; Pinna, A.; Corrias, G. Ensure Traceability in European Food Supply Chain by Using a Blockchain System. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Workshop on Emerging Trends in Software Engineering for Blockchain, WETSEB, Montreal, QC, Canada, 27 May 2019; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 40–47. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kuhi, K.; Kaare, K.; Koppel, O. Ensuring Performance Measurement Integrity in Logistics Using Blockchain. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics, SOLI, Singapore, 31 July–2 August 2018; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 256–261. [ Google Scholar ]
• Barua, A.; Konana, P.; Whinston, A.B.; Yin, F. An Empirical Investigation of Net-Enabled Business Value. MIS Q. 2004 , 28 , 585–620. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Gartner, 2017 Gartner Says Supply Chain Management Market Will Exceed $ 13 Billion in 2017, Up 11 Percent from 2016. Available online: https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2017-06-22-gartner-says-supply-chain-management-market-will-exceed-13-billion-in-2017-up-11-percent-from-2016 (accessed on 14 July 2020).
• Rai, A.; Patnayakuni, R.; Seth, N. Firm Performance Impacts of Digitally Enabled Supply Chain Integration Capabilities. MIS Q. 2006 , 30 , 225–246. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Rai, A.; Brown, P.; Tang, X. Organizational Assimilation of Electronic Procurement Innovations. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2009 , 26 , 257–296. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dasaklis, T.; Casino, F. Improving Vendor-Managed Inventory Strategy Based on Internet of Things (IoT) Applications and Blockchain Technology. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency, ICBC, Seoul, Korea, 14–17 May 2019; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 50–55. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dasaklis, T.K.; Casino, F.; Patsakis, C.; Douligeris, C. A Framework for Supply Chain Traceability Based on Blockchain Tokens. Lect. Notes Bus. Inf. Process. LNBIP 2019 , 362 , 704–716. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rejeb, A.; Keogh, J.G.; Simske, S.J.; Stafford, T.; Treiblmaier, H. Potentials of Blockchain Technologies for Supply Chain Collaboration: A Conceptual Framework. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2021 , 32 , 973–994. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rejeb, A. Blockchain Potential in Tilapia Supply Chain in Ghana. Acta Tech. Jaurinensis 2018 , 11 , 104–118. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Rejeb, A.; Keogh, J.G.; Treiblmaier, H. Leveraging the Internet of Things and Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management. Future Internet 2019 , 11 , 161. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Treiblmaier, H. The Impact of the Blockchain on the Supply Chain: A Theory-Based Research Framework and a Call for Action. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2018 , 23 , 545–559. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Fernández-Caramés, T.M.; Fraga-Lamas, P. A Review on the Use of Blockchain for the Internet of Things. IEEE Access 2018 , 6 , 32979–33001. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Swan, M. Blockchain Blueprint for a New Economy ; O’Reilly Media, Inc.: Sevastopol, CA, USA, 2015; ISBN 978-1-4919-2049-7. [ Google Scholar ]
• Abreu, A.W.; Coutinho, E.F. A Pattern Adherence Analysis to a Blockchain Web Application. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion, (ICSA-C), Salvador, Brazil, 16–20 March 2020; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 103–109. [ Google Scholar ]
• Rejeb, A.; Sűle, E.; Keogh, J.G. Exploring New Technologies in Procurement. Transp. Logist. Int. J. 2018 , 18 , 76–86. [ Google Scholar ]
• Fosso Wamba, S.; Kamdjoug, K.; Robert, J.; Bawack, R.; G Keogh, J. Bitcoin, Blockchain, and FinTech: A Systematic Review and Case Studies in the Supply Chain. Prod. Plan. Control 2020 , 31 , 115–142. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nakamoto, S. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Decentralized Bus. Rev. 2008 , 9 , 21260. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Caro, M.P.; Ali, M.S.; Vecchio, M.; Giaffreda, R. Blockchain-Based Traceability in Agri-Food Supply Chain Management: A Practical Implementation. In Proceedings of the 2018 IoT Vertical and Topical Summit on Agriculture—Tuscany (IOT Tuscany), Tuscany, Italy, 8–9 May 2018; IEEE: Tuscany, Italy, 2018; pp. 1–4. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hughes, A.; Park, A.; Kietzmann, J.; Archer-Brown, C. Beyond Bitcoin: What Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies Mean for Firms. Bus. Horiz. 2019 , 62 , 273–281. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Anandhi, S.; Anitha, R.; Venkatasamy, S. RFID Based Verifiable Ownership Transfer Protocol Using Blockchain Technology. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData), Halifax, NS, Canada, 30 July–3 August; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 1616–1621. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dobrovnik, M.; Herold, D.; Fürst, E.; Kummer, S. Blockchain for and in Logistics: What to Adopt and Where to Start. Logistics 2018 , 2 , 18. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Francisco, K.; Swanson, D. The Supply Chain Has No Clothes: Technology Adoption of Blockchain for Supply Chain Transparency. Logistics 2018 , 2 , 2. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Choi, T.-M.; Guo, S.; Luo, S. When Blockchain Meets Social-Media: Will the Result Benefit Social Media Analytics for Supply Chain Operations Management? Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2020 , 135 , 101860. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rejeb, A.; Keogh, J.G.; Treiblmaier, H. How Blockchain Technology Can Benefit Marketing: Six Pending Research Areas. Front. Blockchain 2020 , 3 , 3. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Li, Z.; Guo, H.; Barenji, A.V.; Wang, W.M.; Guan, Y.; Huang, G.Q. A Sustainable Production Capability Evaluation Mechanism Based on Blockchain, LSTM, Analytic Hierarchy Process for Supply Chain Network. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020 , 58 , 7399–7419. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Treiblmaier, H.; Sillaber, C. The Impact of Blockchain on E-Commerce: A Framework for Salient Research Topics. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2021 , 48 , 101054. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Filimonau, V.; Naumova, E. The Blockchain Technology and the Scope of Its Application in Hospitality Operations. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2019 , 87 , 102383. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Önder, I.; Treiblmaier, H. Blockchain and Tourism: Three Research Propositions. Ann. Tour. Res. 2018 , 72 , 180–182. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Treiblmaier, H. Blockchain and Tourism. In Handbook of E-Tourism ; Xiang, Z., Fuchs, M., Gretzel, U., Höpken, W., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 1–21. ISBN 978-3-030-05324-6. [ Google Scholar ]
• Radanović, I.; Likić, R. Opportunities for Use of Blockchain Technology in Medicine. Appl. Health Econ. Health Policy 2018 , 16 , 583–590. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Stafford, T.F.; Treiblmaier, H. Characteristics of a Blockchain Ecosystem for Secure and Sharable Electronic Medical Records. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2020 , 67 , 1340–1362. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wong, L.-W.; Tan, G.W.-H.; Lee, V.-H.; Ooi, K.-B.; Sohal, A. Unearthing the Determinants of Blockchain Adoption in Supply Chain Management. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020 , 58 , 2100–2123. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Schmidt, C.G.; Wagner, S.M. Blockchain and Supply Chain Relations: A Transaction Cost Theory Perspective. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 2019 , 25 , 100552. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Aranda, D.A.; Fernandez, L.M.M.; Stantchev, V. Integration of Internet of Things (IoT) and Blockchain to Increase Humanitarian Aid Supply Chains Performance. In Proceedings of the ICTIS 2019—5th International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety, Liverpool, UK, 14–17 July 2019; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 140–145. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lähdeaho, O.; Hilmola, O.-P. Business Models amid Changes in Regulation and Environment: The Case of Finland-Russia. Sustain. Switz. 2020 , 12 , 3393. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Bai, C.; Sarkis, J. A Supply Chain Transparency and Sustainability Technology Appraisal Model for Blockchain Technology. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020 , 58 , 2142–2162. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Portugal Ferreira, M. A Bibliometric Study on Ghoshal’s Managing across Borders. Multinatl. Bus. Rev. 2011 , 19 , 357–375. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Wang, N.; Liang, H.; Jia, Y.; Ge, S.; Xue, Y.; Wang, Z. Cloud Computing Research in the IS Discipline: A Citation/Co-Citation Analysis. Decis. Support Syst. 2016 , 86 , 35–47. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Queiroz, M.M.; Telles, R.; Bonilla, S.H. Blockchain and Supply Chain Management Integration: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Supply Chain Manag. 2019 , 25 , 241–254. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, Y.; Hungh, H.J.; Paul, B.-D. Understanding Blockchain Technology for Future Supply Chains a Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2018 . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Muessigmann, B.; von der Gracht, H.; Hartmann, E. Blockchain Technology in Logistics and Supply Chain Management-A Bibliometric Literature Review From 2016 to January 2020. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2020 , 67 , 988–1007. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nurgazina, J.; Pakdeetrakulwong, U.; Moser, T.; Reiner, G. Distributed Ledger Technology Applications in Food Supply Chains: A Review of Challenges and Future Research Directions. Sustainability 2021 , 13 , 4206. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vivaldini, M.; de Sousa, P.R. Blockchain Connectivity Inhibitors: Weaknesses Affecting Supply Chain Interaction and Resilience. Benchmarking-Int. J. 2021 . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cole, R.; Stevenson, M.; Aitken, J. Blockchain Technology: Implications for Operations and Supply Chain Management. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2019 , 24 , 469–483. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chang, S.E.; Chen, Y. When Blockchain Meets Supply Chain: A Systematic Literature Review on Current Development and Potential Applications. IEEE Access 2020 , 8 , 62478–62494. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pournader, M.; Shi, Y.; Seuring, S.; Koh, S.C.L. Blockchain Applications in Supply Chains, Transport and Logistics: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020 , 58 , 2063–2081. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tandon, A.; Kaur, P.; Mantymaki, M.; Dhir, A. Blockchain Applications in Management: A Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021 , 166 , 120649. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vijayakumar, P.B.; Morley, M.J.; Heraty, N.; Mendenhall, M.E.; Osland, J.S. Leadership in the Global Context: Bibliometric and Thematic Patterns of an Evolving Field. In Advances in Global Leadership ; Emerald Publishing Limited: Bingley, UK, 2018; Volume 11, pp. 31–72. ISBN 978-1-78754-297-6. [ Google Scholar ]
• Paliwal, V.; Chandra, S.; Sharma, S. Blockchain Technology for Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Literature Review and a Classification Framework. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 7638. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kummer, S.; Herold, D.M.; Dobrovnik, M.; Mikl, J.; Schäfer, N. A Systematic Review of Blockchain Literature in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Identifying Research Questions and Future Directions. Future Internet 2020 , 12 , 60. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Maflahi, N.; Thelwall, M. When Are Readership Counts as Useful as Citation Counts? Scopus versus Mendeley for LIS Journals. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2016 , 67 , 191–199. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Ke, I.; Bronicki, J. Using Scopus to Study Researchers’ Citing Behavior for Local Collection Decisions: A Focus on Psychology. J. Libr. Adm. 2015 , 55 , 165–178. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Foncubierta-Rodríguez, A.; Müller, H.; Depeursinge, A. Retrieval of High-Dimensional Visual Data: Current State, Trends and Challenges Ahead. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2014 , 69 , 539–567. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Ramos-Rodríguez, A.-R.; Ruíz-Navarro, J. Changes in the Intellectual Structure of Strategic Management Research: A Bibliometric Study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strateg. Manag. J. 2004 , 25 , 981–1004. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tranfield, D.; Denyer, D.; Smart, P. Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. Br. J. Manag. 2003 , 14 , 207–222. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Raghuram, S.; Tuertscher, P.; Garud, R. Research Note—Mapping the Field of Virtual Work: A Cocitation Analysis. Inf. Syst. Res. 2009 , 21 , 983–999. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fahimnia, B.; Sarkis, J.; Davarzani, H. Green Supply Chain Management: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015 , 162 , 101–114. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Velho, L. The “Meaning” of Citation in the Context of a Scientifically Peripheral Country. Scientometrics 2005 , 9 , 71–89. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zupic, I.; Čater, T. Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organ. Res. Methods 2015 , 18 , 429–472. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Small, H. Co-Citation in the Scientific Literature: A New Measure of the Relationship between Two Documents. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 1973 , 24 , 265–269. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Choi, J.Y.; Jeong, S.; Jung, J.-K. Evolution of Technology Convergence Networks in Korea: Characteristics of Temporal Changes in R&D According to Institution Type. PLoS ONE 2018 , 13 , e0192195. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Ward, S.F.; Peláez-Verdet, A. A Network Analysis of the Academic Publications on Tourism. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Tour. IJIST 2018 , 3 , 57–67. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yoon, J.; Park, H.W. Pattern and Trend of Scientific Knowledge Production in North Korea by a Semantic Network Analysis of Papers in Journal Titled Technological Innovation. Scientometrics 2020 , 124 , 1421–1438. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lee, P.-C.; Su, H.-N. Investigating the Structure of Regional Innovation System Research through Keyword Co-Occurrence and Social Network Analysis. Innovation 2010 , 12 , 26–40. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Tian, F. An Agri-Food Supply Chain Traceability System for China Based on RFID & Blockchain Technology. In Proceedings of the 2016 13th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, ICSSSM, Kunming, China, 24–26 June 2016; Chen, J.Y.B., Cai, X., Zhou, C., Qin, K., Eds.; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016. [ Google Scholar ]
• de Havilland, P. Blockchain in Supply Chain Management: Does It Actually Solve the Major Point of Weakness? Available online: https://bitsonline.com/blockchain-supply-chain-management-actually-solve-major-point-weakness/ (accessed on 14 July 2020).
• Chang, S.E.; Chen, Y.-C.; Lu, M.-F. Supply Chain Re-Engineering Using Blockchain Technology: A Case of Smart Contract Based Tracking Process. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2019 , 144 , 1–11. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hinckeldeyn, J.; Jochen, K. (Short Paper) Developing a Smart Storage Container for a Blockchain-Based Supply Chain Application. In Proceedings of the 2018 Crypto Valley Conference on Blockchain Technology, CVCBT, Zug, Switzerland, 20–22 June 2018; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 97–100. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kim, J.-S.; Shin, N. The Impact of Blockchain Technology Application on Supply Chain Partnership and Performance. Sustainability 2019 , 11 , 6181. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Tian, F. A Supply Chain Traceability System for Food Safety Based on HACCP, Blockchain & Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, Dalian, China, 16–18 June 2017. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kittipanya-ngam, P.; Tan, K.H. A Framework for Food Supply Chain Digitalization: Lessons from Thailand. Prod. Plan. Control 2020 , 31 , 158–172. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Garaus, M.; Treiblmaier, H. The Influence of Blockchain-Based Food Traceability on Retailer Choice: The Mediating Role of Trust. Food Control 2021 , 129 , 108082. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rejeb, A.; Keogh, J.G.; Zailani, S.; Treiblmaier, H.; Rejeb, K. Blockchain Technology in the Food Industry: A Review of Potentials, Challenges and Future Research Directions. Logistics 2020 , 4 , 27. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ivanov, D.; Dolgui, A.; Sokolov, B. The Impact of Digital Technology and Industry 4.0 on the Ripple Effect and Supply Chain Risk Analytics. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019 , 57 , 829–846. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wust, K.; Gervais, A. Do You Need a Blockchain? In Proceedings of the 2018 Crypto Valley Conference on Blockchain Technology (CVCBT), Zug, Switzerland, 20–22 June 2018; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 45–54. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kim, H.M.; Laskowski, M. Toward an Ontology-Driven Blockchain Design for Supply-Chain Provenance. Intell. Syst. Account. Finance Manag. 2018 , 25 , 18–27. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kshetri, N. Blockchain’s Roles in Strengthening Cybersecurity and Protecting Privacy. Telecommun. Policy 2017 , 41 , 1027–1038. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Queiroz, M.M.; Fosso Wamba, S. Blockchain Adoption Challenges in Supply Chain: An Empirical Investigation of the Main Drivers in India and the USA. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2019 , 46 , 70–82. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Clauset, A.; Newman, M.E.J.; Moore, C. Finding Community Structure in Very Large Networks. Phys. Rev. E 2004 , 70 , 066111. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Blondel, V.D.; Guillaume, J.-L.; Lambiotte, R.; Lefebvre, E. Fast Unfolding of Communities in Large Networks. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2008 , 2008 , P10008. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Girvan, M.; Newman, M.E.J. Community Structure in Social and Biological Networks. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Oakland, CA, USA, 11 June 2002; Volume 99, pp. 7821–7826. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hjorland, B. Data (with Big Data and Database Semantics)t. Knowl. Organ. 2018 , 45 , 685–708. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kouhizadeh, M.; Saberi, S.; Sarkis, J. Blockchain Technology and the Sustainable Supply Chain: Theoretically Exploring Adoption Barriers. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2021 , 231 , 107831. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kamble, S.; Gunasekaran, A.; Arha, H. Understanding the Blockchain Technology Adoption in Supply Chains-Indian Context. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019 , 57 , 2009–2033. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Holland, M.; Stjepandic, J.; Nigischer, C. Intellectual Property Protection of 3D Print Supply Chain with Blockchain Technology. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, ICE/ITMC, Stuttgart, Germany, 17–20 June 2018; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mondragon, A.E.C.; Mondragon, C.E.C.; Coronado, E.S. Feasibility of Internet of Things and Agnostic Blockchain Technology Solutions: A Case in the Fisheries Supply Chain. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 7th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications, ICIEA, Bangkok, Thailand, 16–21 April 2020; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 504–508. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yadav, S.; Singh, S.P. An Integrated Fuzzy-ANP and Fuzzy-ISM Approach Using Blockchain for Sustainable Supply Chain. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2020 , 34 , 54–78. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Behnke, K.; Janssen, M.F.W.H.A. Boundary Conditions for Traceability in Food Supply Chains Using Blockchain Technology. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020 , 52 , 101969. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Di Vaio, A.; Varriale, L. Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management for Sustainable Performance: Evidence from the Airport Industry. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020 , 52 , 102014. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sheel, A.; Nath, V. Antecedents of Blockchain Technology Adoption Intentions in the Supply Chain. Int. J. Bus. Innov. Res. 2020 , 21 , 564–584. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Holland, M.; Nigischer, C.; Stjepandic, J. Copyright Protection in Additive Manufacturing with Blockchain Approach. In Transdisciplinary Engineering: A Paradigm Shift ; Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering; Peruzzini, M.T.A.C., Wognum, N., Stjepandic, J., Chen, C.H., Wognum, N., Eds.; IOS Press BV: Singapore, 2017; Volume 5, pp. 914–921. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mondragon, A.E.C.; Coronado, C.E.; Coronado, E.S. Investigating the Applicability of Distributed Ledger/Blockchain Technology in Manufacturing and Perishable Goods Supply Chains. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 6th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications, ICIEA, Tokyo, Japan, 12–15 April 2019; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 728–732. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yadav, S.; Singh, S.P. Blockchain Critical Success Factors for Sustainable Supply Chain. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020 , 152 , 104505. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kamble, S.S.; Gunasekaran, A.; Sharma, R. Modeling the Blockchain Enabled Traceability in Agriculture Supply Chain. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020 , 52 , 101967. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sheel, A.; Nath, V. Effect of Blockchain Technology Adoption on Supply Chain Adaptability, Agility, Alignment and Performance. Manag. Res. Rev. 2019 , 42 , 1353–1374. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Engelmann, F.; Holland, M.; Nigischer, C.; Stjepandić, J. Intellectual Property Protection and Licensing of 3d Print with Blockchain Technology. In Transdisciplinary Engineering Methods for Social Innovation of Industry 4.0 ; Advances in Transdisciplinary, Engineering; Wognum, N.P.M., Stjepandic, J., Pellicciari, M., Bil, C., Eds.; IOS Press BV: Singapore, 2018; Volume 7, pp. 103–112. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hastig, G.M.; Sodhi, M.S. Blockchain for Supply Chain Traceability: Business Requirements and Critical Success Factors. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2020 , 29 , 935–954. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fosso Wamba, S.; Queiroz, M.M.; Trinchera, L. Dynamics between Blockchain Adoption Determinants and Supply Chain Performance: An Empirical Investigation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020 , 229 , 107791. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Miraz, M.H.; Hassan, M.G.; Mohd Sharif, K.I. Factors Affecting Implementation of Blockchain in Retail Market in Malaysia. Int. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2020 , 9 , 385–391. [ Google Scholar ]
• Muller, M.; Garzon, S.R.; Westerkamp, M.; Lux, Z.A. HIDALS: A Hybrid IoT-Based Decentralized Application for Logistics and Supply Chain Management. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 10th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference, IEMCON, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 17–19 October 2019; Chakrabarti, S.S.H.N., Ed.; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 802–808. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wong, L.-W.; Leong, L.-Y.; Hew, J.-J.; Tan, G.W.-H.; Ooi, K.-B. Time to Seize the Digital Evolution: Adoption of Blockchain in Operations and Supply Chain Management among Malaysian SMEs. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020 , 52 , 101997. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gunasekaran, A.; Yusuf, Y.Y.; Adeleye, E.O.; Papadopoulos, T.; Kovvuri, D.; Geyi, D.G. Agile Manufacturing: An Evolutionary Review of Practices. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019 , 57 , 5154–5174. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Ko, T.; Lee, J.; Ryu, D. Blockchain Technology and Manufacturing Industry: Real-Time Transparency and Cost Savings. Sustainability 2018 , 10 , 4274. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Divey, S.J.; Hakan Hekimoglu, M.; Ravichandran, T. Blockchains in Supply Chains: Potential Research Directions. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON), Atlanta, GA, USA, 12–14 June 2019; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019. [ Google Scholar ]
• Karamchandani, A.; Srivastava, S.K.; Srivastava, R.K. Perception-Based Model for Analyzing the Impact of Enterprise Blockchain Adoption on SCM in the Indian Service Industry. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020 , 52 , 102019. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Delafenestre, R. New Business Models in Supply Chains: A Bibliometric Study. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 2019 , 47 , 1283–1299. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• dos Santos, R.B.; Torrisi, N.M.; Yamada, E.R.K.; Pantoni, R.P. IGR Token-Raw Material and Ingredient Certification of Recipe Based Foods Using Smart Contracts. Informatics 2019 , 6 , 11. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Batwa, A.; Norrman, A. A Framework for Exploring Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management. Oper. Supply Chain Manag. 2020 , 13 , 294–306. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Srivastava, S.; Bhadauria, A.; Dhaneshwar, S.; Gupta, S. Traceability and Transparency in Supply Chain Management System of Pharmaceutical Goods through Block Chain. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 2019 , 8 , 3201–3206. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lustenberger, M.; Spychiger, F.; Malesevic, S. Towards a Better Understanding of the Value of Blockchains in Supply Chain Management. Lect. Notes Bus. Inf. Process. 2020 , 381 , 101–112. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, Y.; Singgih, M.; Wang, J.; Rit, M. Making Sense of Blockchain Technology: How Will It Transform Supply Chains? Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2019 , 211 , 221–236. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ghode, D.; Yadav, V.; Jain, R.; Soni, G. Adoption of Blockchain in Supply Chain: An Analysis of Influencing Factors. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2020 , 33 , 437–456. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Denis, L.; Krishnakumar, T.; Karthikeyan, M.; Sasipriya, S. A Secured and Tamper Free Authentication and Verification of Transactions over the Network in Cash Logistics Industry. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 2020 , 9 , 956–959. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lu, D.; Moreno-Sanchez, P.; Zeryihun, A.; Bajpayi, S.; Yin, S.; Feldman, K.; Kosofsky, J.; Mitra, P.; Kate, A. Reducing Automotive Counterfeiting Using Blockchain: Benefits and Challenges. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Decentralized Applications and Infrastructures (DAPPCON), Newark, CA, USA, 4–9 April 2019; Kupper, A.X.J., Park, Y., Ruppel, P., Schulte, S., Eds.; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 39–48. [ Google Scholar ]
• Palas, M.J.U.; Bunduchi, R. Exploring Interpretations of Blockchain’s Value in Healthcare: A Multi-Stakeholder Approach. Inf. Technol. People 2020 , 34 , 453–495. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Allen, D.W.E.; Berg, C.; Davidson, S.; Novak, M.; Potts, J. International Policy Coordination for Blockchain Supply Chains. Asia Pac. Policy Stud. 2019 , 6 , 367–380. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Caldarelli, G.; Rossignoli, C.; Zardini, A. Overcoming the Blockchain Oracle Problem in the Traceability of Non-Fungible Products. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 2391. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Wood, D.J. Measuring Corporate Social Performance: A Review. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2010 , 12 , 50–84. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gallear, D.; Ghobadian, A.; Chen, W. Corporate Responsibility, Supply Chain Partnership and Performance: An Empirical Examination. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2012 , 140 , 83–91. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• O’Connor, N.; Lowry, P.B.; Treiblmaier, H. Interorganizational Cooperation and Supplier Performance in High-Technology Supply Chains. Heliyon 2020 , 6 , e03434. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Clohessy, T.; Treiblmaier, H.; Acton, T.; Rogers, N. Antecedents of Blockchain Adoption: An Integrative Framework. Strateg. Chang. 2020 , 29 , 501–515. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kouhizadeh, M.; Sarkis, J. Blockchain Practices, Potentials, and Perspectives in Greening Supply Chains. Sustainability 2018 , 10 , 3652. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Maskell, B. The Age of Agile Manufacturing. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2001 , 6 , 5–11. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sambamurthy, V.; Bharadwaj, A.; Grover, V. Shaping Agility Through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms. MIS Q. 2003 , 27 , 237–263. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• van Oosterhout, M.; Waarts, E.; van Hillegersberg, J. Change Factors Requiring Agility and Implications for IT. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2006 , 15 , 132–145. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wadhwa, S.; Mishra, M.; Chan, F.T.S.; Ducq, Y. Effects of Information Transparency and Cooperation on Supply Chain Performance: A Simulation Study. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2010 , 48 , 145–166. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ahluwalia, S.; Mahto, R.V.; Guerrero, M. Blockchain Technology and Startup Financing: A Transaction Cost Economics Perspective. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2020 , 151 , 119854. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kamble, S.S.; Gunasekaran, A.; Gawankar, S.A. Achieving Sustainable Performance in a Data-Driven Agriculture Supply Chain: A Review for Research and Applications. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2019 , 219 , 179–194. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Feng, Q.; He, D.; Zeadally, S.; Khan, M.K.; Kumar, N. A Survey on Privacy Protection in Blockchain System. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2019 , 126 , 45–58. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kumar, A.; Liu, R.; Shan, Z. Is Blockchain a Silver Bullet for Supply Chain Management? Technical Challenges and Research Opportunities. Decis. Sci. 2019 , 51 , 8–37. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mattke, J.; Hund, A.; Maier, C.; Weitzel, T. How an Enterprise Blockchain Application in the U.S. Pharmaceuticals Supply Chain Is Saving Lives. MIS Q. Exec. 2019 , 18 , 245–261. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ring, P.S.; Ven, A.H. van de Structuring Cooperative Relationships between Organizations. Strateg. Manag. J. 1992 , 13 , 483–498. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nofer, M.; Gomber, P.; Hinz, O.; Schiereck, D. Blockchain. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2017 , 59 , 183–187. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Liao, D.-Y.; Wang, X. Applications of Blockchain Technology to Logistics Management in Integrated Casinos and Entertainment. Informatics 2018 , 5 , 44. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Petroni, B.C.A.; de Moraes, E.M.; Gonçalves, R.F. Big Data Analytics for Logistics and Distributions Using Blockchain. IFIP Adv. Inf. Commun. Technol. 2018 , 536 , 363–369. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tang, C.S.; Veelenturf, L.P. The Strategic Role of Logistics in the Industry 4.0 Era. Transp. Res. Part E 2019 , 129 , 1–11. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zheng, T.; Ardolino, M.; Bacchetti, A.; Perona, M. The Applications of Industry 4.0 Technologies in Manufacturing Context: A Systematic Literature Review. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2021 , 59 , 1922–1954. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• George, R.V.; Harsh, H.O.; Ray, P.; Babu, A.K. Food Quality Traceability Prototype for Restaurants Using Blockchain and Food Quality Data Index. J. Clean. Prod. 2019 , 240 , 118021. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kurpjuweit, S.; Schmidt, C.G.; Klöckner, M.; Wagner, S.M. Blockchain in Additive Manufacturing and Its Impact on Supply Chains. J. Bus. Logist. 2019 , 1 , 46–70. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gibson, I.; Rosen, D.; Stucker, B. Development of Additive Manufacturing Technology. In Additive Manufacturing Technologies: 3D Printing, Rapid Prototyping, and Direct Digital Manufacturing ; Gibson, I., Rosen, D., Stucker, B., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 19–42. ISBN 978-1-4939-2113-3. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bumblauskas, D.; Mann, A.; Dugan, B.; Rittmer, J. A Blockchain Use Case in Food Distribution: Do You Know Where Your Food Has Been? Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020 , 52 , 102008. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kwok, A.O.J.; Koh, S.G.M. Neural Network Insights of Blockchain Technology in Manufacturing Improvement. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 7th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA), Bangkok, Thailand, 16–21 April 2020; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 932–936. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yadav, V.S.; Singh, A.R.; Raut, R.D.; Govindarajan, U.H. Blockchain Technology Adoption Barriers in the Indian Agricultural Supply Chain: An Integrated Approach. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020 , 161 , 104877. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kamel, S.; Hussein, M. The Development of E-commerce: The Emerging Virtual Context within Egypt. Logist. Inf. Manag. 2001 , 14 , 119–127. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chang, Y.; Iakovou, E.; Shi, W. Blockchain in Global Supply Chains and Cross Border Trade: A Critical Synthesis of the State-of-the-Art, Challenges and Opportunities. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020 , 58 , 2082–2099. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Habib, M.A.; Sardar, M.B.; Jabbar, S.; Faisal, C.M.N.; Mahmood, N.; Ahmad, M. Blockchain-Based Supply Chain for the Automation of Transaction Process: Case Study Based Validation. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Engineering and Emerging Technologies (ICEET), Lahore, Pakistan, 22–23 February 2020; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lahkani, M.J.; Wang, S.; Urbański, M.; Egorova, M. Sustainable B2B E-Commerce and Blockchain-Based Supply Chain Finance. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 3968. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, S.; Shi, R.; Ren, Z.; Yan, J.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, J. A Blockchain-Based Supply Chain Quality Management Framework. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 14th International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE), Shanghai, China, 4–6 November 2017; IEEE: Shanghai, China, 2017; pp. 172–176. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lei, S.; Haiying, W.; Haiyue, L.; Weiyu, T. Research of Innovative Business Classification in Bulk Commodity Digital Supply Chain Finance. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Computer Engineering and Application (ICCEA), Guangzhou, China, 18–20 March 2020; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 170–173. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wang, S.; Qu, X. Blockchain Applications in Shipping, Transportation, Logistics, and Supply Chain. Smart Innov. Syst. Technol. 2019 , 149 , 225–231. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Routroy, S.; Potdar, P.K.; Shankar, A. Measurement of Manufacturing Agility: A Case Study. Meas. Bus. Excell. 2015 , 19 , 1–22. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Grest, M.; Lauras, M.; Montarnal, A.; Sarazin, A.; Bousseau, G. A Meta Model for a Blockchain-Based Supply Chain Traceability. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM), Shanghai, China, 25–27 September 2019; Zheng, F.L.M., Chu, F., Eds.; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019. [ Google Scholar ]
• Golan, E.; Krissoff, B.; Kuchler, F.; Calvin, L.; Nelson, K.E.; Price, G.K. Traceability in the US Food Supply: Economic Theory and Industry Studies ; United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2004.

Share and Cite

Rejeb, A.; Rejeb, K.; Simske, S.; Treiblmaier, H. Blockchain Technologies in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: A Bibliometric Review. Logistics 2021 , 5 , 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics5040072

Rejeb A, Rejeb K, Simske S, Treiblmaier H. Blockchain Technologies in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: A Bibliometric Review. Logistics . 2021; 5(4):72. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics5040072

Rejeb, Abderahman, Karim Rejeb, Steve Simske, and Horst Treiblmaier. 2021. "Blockchain Technologies in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: A Bibliometric Review" Logistics 5, no. 4: 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics5040072

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• My Bibliography
• Collections
• Citation manager

Save citation to file

Email citation, add to collections.

• Create a new collection
• Add to an existing collection

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.

• Search in PubMed
• Search in NLM Catalog
• Add to Search

Blockchain in supply chain management: a review, bibliometric, and network analysis

Affiliations.

• 1 School of the Built Environment, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
• 2 Department of Electrical Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure, 1100 Notre-Dame St. W, Montréal, Canada. [email protected].
• 3 Department of Management Studies and Quantitative Methods, Parthenope University, Naples, Italy.
• PMID: 33638786
• DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-13094-3

Blockchain is a distributed ledger technology that has attracted both practitioners and academics attention in recent years. Several conceptual and few empirical studies have been published focusing on addressing current issues and recommending the future research directions of supply chain management. To identify how blockchain can contribute to supply chain management, this paper conducts a systematic review through bibliometric and network analysis. We determined the key authors, significant studies, and the collaboration patterns that were not considered by the previous publications on this angel of supply chain management. Using citation and co-citation analysis, key supply chain areas that blockchain could contribute are pinpointed as supply chain management, finance, logistics, and security. Furthermore, it revealed that Internet of Things (IoT) and smart contracts are the leading emerging technologies in this field. The results of highly cited and co-cited articles demonstrate that blockchain could enhance transparency, traceability, efficiency, and information security in supply chain management. The analysis also revealed that empirical research is scarce in this field. Therefore, implementing blockchain in the real-world supply chain is a considerable future research opportunity.

Keywords: Bibliometric; Blockchain; Literature review; Network analysis; Supply chain management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

• A bibliometric study on blockchain-based supply chain: a theme analysis, adopted methodologies, and future research agenda. Shoaib M, Zhang S, Ali H. Shoaib M, et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(6):14029-14049. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24844-2. Epub 2022 Dec 26. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023. PMID: 36571684 Free PMC article. Review.
• Analysis of Agriculture and Food Supply Chain through Blockchain and IoT with Light Weight Cluster Head. Adow AH, Shrivas MK, Mahdi HF, Zahra MMA, Verma D, Doohan NV, Jalali A. Adow AH, et al. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Aug 10;2022:1296993. doi: 10.1155/2022/1296993. eCollection 2022. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35990137 Free PMC article. Retracted.
• Adaptation of IoT with Blockchain in Food Supply Chain Management: An Analysis-Based Review in Development, Benefits and Potential Applications. Kaur A, Singh G, Kukreja V, Sharma S, Singh S, Yoon B. Kaur A, et al. Sensors (Basel). 2022 Oct 25;22(21):8174. doi: 10.3390/s22218174. Sensors (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36365871 Free PMC article. Review.
• Toward an Intelligent Blockchain IoT-Enabled Fish Supply Chain: A Review and Conceptual Framework. Ismail S, Reza H, Salameh K, Kashani Zadeh H, Vasefi F. Ismail S, et al. Sensors (Basel). 2023 May 28;23(11):5136. doi: 10.3390/s23115136. Sensors (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37299864 Free PMC article. Review.
• A Content-Analysis Based Literature Review in Blockchain Adoption within Food Supply Chain. Duan J, Zhang C, Gong Y, Brown S, Li Z. Duan J, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 9;17(5):1784. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051784. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32182951 Free PMC article. Review.
• Biomedical blockchain with practical implementations and quantitative evaluations: a systematic review. Lacson R, Yu Y, Kuo TT, Ohno-Machado L. Lacson R, et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 May 20;31(6):1423-1435. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae084. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024. PMID: 38726710
• Fear of Missing Out: Constrained Trial of Blockchain in Supply Chain. Kromes R, Li T, Bouillon M, Güler TE, van der Hulst V, Erkin Z. Kromes R, et al. Sensors (Basel). 2024 Feb 2;24(3):986. doi: 10.3390/s24030986. Sensors (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38339703 Free PMC article.
• Digital transformation, productive services agglomeration and innovation performance. Ding Y, Shi Z, Xi R, Diao Y, Hu Y. Ding Y, et al. Heliyon. 2024 Feb 2;10(3):e25534. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25534. eCollection 2024 Feb 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 38333850 Free PMC article.
• Blockchain based transparent and reliable framework for wheat crop supply chain. Farooq MS, Ansari ZK, Alvi A, Rustam F, Díez IT, Mazón JLV, Rodríguez CL, Ashraf I. Farooq MS, et al. PLoS One. 2024 Jan 11;19(1):e0295036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295036. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38206967 Free PMC article.
• Discussing blockchain applications in TED Talks: A fashion wave approach to understanding the blockchain phenomenon. Bonazzi R, Gautschi H, Viscusi G. Bonazzi R, et al. PLoS One. 2023 Jul 25;18(7):e0289025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289025. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37490499 Free PMC article.
• Abeyratne S, Monfared R (2016) Blockchain ready manufacturing supply chain using distributed ledger. Int J Res Eng Technol 05(09):1–10. https://doi.org/10.15623/ijret.2016.0509001 - DOI
• Apte S, Petrovsky N (2016) Will blockchain technology revolutionize excipient supply chain management?. Journal of Excipients and Food Chemicals 7(3):910
• Baumeister RF, Leary MR (1997) Writing narrative literature reviews. Rev Gen Psychol 1(3):311–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311 - DOI
• Borgatti SP, Mehra A, Brass DJ, Labianca G (2009) Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323(5916):892–895. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165821 - DOI
• Boyack KW, Klavans R (2010) Co-citation analysis, biblioFig.ic coupling, and direct citation: which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 61(12):2389–2404 - DOI

Publication types

• Search in MeSH

LinkOut - more resources

Full text sources, other literature sources.

• scite Smart Citations
• Citation Manager

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

• DOI: 10.20875/makusobed.1413455
• Corpus ID: 270135937

A Comprehensive Analysis of Blockchain Applications in Supply Chain Management and Logistics Activities

• İbrahim Ethem Dağdeviren , Şakir Mirza
• Published in Mehmet Akif Ersoy… 24 February 2024
• Business, Computer Science

43 References

Dynamics between blockchain adoption determinants and supply chain performance: an empirical investigation, blockchain applications in management: a bibliometric analysis and literature review, 1 blockchain's roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives, blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management, analysis of barriers to implement blockchain in industry and service sectors, the effect of blockchain technology on supply chain sustainability performances, blockchain, business and the fourth industrial revolution: whence, whither, wherefore and how, blockchain technology implementation in logistics, a blockchain research framework, telematics and informatics, related papers.

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers

• Instructions for Authors
• Submit Log in/Register

Share this article with

Create alert.

Delving into the Adoption of Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management

How to cite: Reynolds, S. Delving into the Adoption of Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management. Preprints 2024 , 2024060481. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202406.0481.v1 Reynolds, S. Delving into the Adoption of Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management. Preprints 2024, 2024060481. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202406.0481.v1 Copy

Reynolds, S. Delving into the Adoption of Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management. Preprints 2024 , 2024060481. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202406.0481.v1

Reynolds, S. (2024). Delving into the Adoption of Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202406.0481.v1

Reynolds, S. 2024 "Delving into the Adoption of Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202406.0481.v1

Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments (0)

Not displayed online.

Mathematical equations can be typed in either LaTeX formats \\[ ... \\] or $$ ... $$, or MathML format <math> ... </math>. Try the LaTeX or MathML example.

Please click a symbol to insert it into the message box below:

Please enter the link here:

Optionally, you can enter text that should appear as linked text:

Please enter or paste the URL to the image here (please only use links to jpg/jpeg, png and gif images):

Wikify editor is a simple editor for wiki-style mark-up. It was written by MDPI for Sciforum in 2014. The rendering of the mark-up is based on Wiky.php with some tweaks. Rendering of mathematical equations is done with MathJax . Please send us a message for support or for reporting bugs.

Comments must follow the standards of professional discourse and should focus on the scientific content of the article. Insulting or offensive language, personal attacks and off-topic remarks will not be permitted. Comments must be written in English. Preprints reserves the right to remove comments without notice. Readers who post comments are obliged to declare any competing interests, financial or otherwise.

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

what’s this?

Add a record of this review to Publons to track and showcase your reviewing expertise across the world’s journals.

IEEE Account

• Change Username/Password
• Update Address

Purchase Details

• Payment Options
• Order History
• View Purchased Documents

Profile Information

• Communications Preferences
• Profession and Education
• Technical Interests
• US & Canada: +1 800 678 4333
• Worldwide: +1 732 981 0060
• Contact & Support
• About IEEE Xplore
• Accessibility
• Terms of Use
• Nondiscrimination Policy
• Privacy & Opting Out of Cookies

A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest technical professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity. © Copyright 2024 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.

Advertisement

How blockchain technology improves sustainable supply chain processes: a practical guide

• Published: 29 December 2022
• Volume 16 , pages 620–641, ( 2023 )

Cite this article

• Rita Maria Difrancesco 1 ,
• Purushottam Meena 2 &
• Gopal Kumar 3  

12k Accesses

15 Citations

59 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

Blockchain technology has rapidly grown in the last decade and supply chain management has started to emerge as one of its possible fields of application. Blockchain is estimated to have a transformative impact and potentially transform and disrupt supply chains. However, despite recognizing its enormous opportunity, there is still an incomplete, dispersed, and fragmented knowledge of blockchain applications beyond cryptocurrencies. Very few business people still deeply understand how blockchain works and how it can concretely benefit supply chains. This paper contributes to closing this gap, providing a holistic approach to analyzing blockchain technology's applications and benefits in supply chain management. This study aims to support academics and practitioners in adopting a holistic perspective and realizing the potential this technology can offer in different areas of the supply chain, its managerial impact, challenges, and limitations. A "closed-loop" value chain perspective is adopted to analyze the benefits at each core process of the supply chain, from sourcing to final customer and reverse logistics. This paper conducts qualitative research using case studies analysis based on secondary data. Further, it builds a theoretical framework for blockchain-enhanced supply chain performance based on the results of the qualitative research. Finally, the paper discusses the major drawbacks and barriers to blockchain implementation, which help managers evaluate its real net benefits.

Similar content being viewed by others

Blockchain Technology Implications on Supply Chain Management: A Review of the Literature

Potentials of Blockchain Technologies in Supply Chain Management—Empirical Results

A Meta-review of Blockchain Adoption Literature in Supply Chain

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

1 Introduction

In June 2018, a salmonella outbreak affected pre-cut melons from several United States (US) retailers–including Costco, Kroger, Trader Joe's, Walmart, and Whole Foods. It took weeks for the US Food and Drug Administration to identify responsible suppliers and all the stores where the melon was sold. If blockchain technology had been used, they could have contained the outbreak and avoided destroying the entire inventory of a product for safety precautions (Selk 2018 ). It is just an illustrative example demonstrating blockchain technology's importance and potential in supply chain management. Blockchain technology is gaining increasing attention among researchers and practitioners, and more and more companies have recently started to develop studies to evaluate its possible benefits. The concept of blockchain technology was first introduced in 2008 in a whitepaper on bitcoin authored by Satoshi Nakamoto (who is still an unknown person-or people). Born initially with bitcoin and conceptualized to facilitate cryptocurrency transactions, only a few years later, experts realized that cryptocurrency was just one application of blockchain and started investigating other application areas.

More recently, supply chain management experts have begun to analyze the possible benefits of blockchain implementation in this complex area. Today's supply chains are more complex than ever due to their global nature (Difrancesco et al. 2021 ) and companies have to continuously evolve and rapidly adapt to the different customers' needs, which require fast, agile, and dynamic supply chains. All these factors make companies' survival even more challenging; therefore, efficiency, effectiveness, speed, and transparency in their supply chains are even more critical. Blockchain technology is becoming so attractive for supply chain management because it can achieve a high degree of trust, accuracy and transparency, and real-time tracking of products, data, owners, and actions taken at any stage. The key role of trust, traceability, and transparency in supply chains has been widely discussed in the literature (e.g., Heese 2007 ; Skilton and Robinson 2009 ; Buell et al. 2016 ), and it shows how these characteristics can significantly improve supply chain performance. However, in practice, there is still a significant lack of visibility and transparency in supply chains. For example, a recent survey conducted by Deloitte with over 400 Chief Procurement Officers (CPOs) reveals that only 18% of CPOs have formal visibility of the risks in their tier-1 suppliers, and only 15% have visibility beyond that (Deloitte 2021 ). Moreover, such a lack of visibility increases as we move away from the manufacturer (O'Marah et al. 2014 ). Lastly, the explosion of globalization, and the growing attention to sustainability, have intensified even more the urgency to create greater transparency across supply chain networks (Awaysheh and Klassen 2010 ; Earley 2013 ; Di Vaio and Varriale 2020 ).

Blockchain development grew by more than 6,000% in 2018, and a recent survey by SAP found that 92% of business leaders view blockchain as an opportunity, with its major applications in several areas, including supply chains (Myerson 2018 ). Blockchain is estimated to have a transformative impact across supply chains and has the potential to transform and disrupt supply chains (Gartner 2018 ). Moreover, due to the Covid-19 pandemic, companies have started to accelerate their investment in technologies: a recent Gartner survey showed that nearly 70% of companies accelerated their digital transformation during the pandemic (Gartner 2021 ), emphasizing the increasing need for resilient and agile supply chains to prevent and deal with disruptions (Dutta et al. 2020 ). Forecasts highlight global blockchain technology revenue to grow significantly, reaching approximately $39 billion by 2025 (Statista 2020 ). However, despite recognizing its huge opportunity, very few business people still deeply understand how it works and how it can be implemented. A study conducted on European and US companies shows that a high percentage of the participants (43%, which rises to 65% if focusing exclusively on supply chain companies) does not look into blockchain yet or observed its development from a distance (Niels and Moritz 2017 ). Therefore, supply chain leaders must understand how to implement blockchain technology and explore its potential benefits. Most of the earlier studies and applications of blockchain technology were related to bitcoin and the financial area. However, other fields, like supply chain management, still lack knowledge and tests to support the evolution and possible implementation of blockchain technology in this area (Dutta et al. 2020 ; Cheung et al. 2021 ; Lim et al. 2021 ).

This study aims to support academics and supply chain practitioners in adopting a holistic perspective while getting familiar with the fundamentals of blockchain technology. While most of the literature on blockchain applications in supply chain mainly focuses on the food, pharmaceutical, and transportation sectors, this paper offers a more comprehensive view, including other industries such as automotive, fashion, electronics, cosmetics, and consumer goods. This supports and guides managers also in other supply chain sectors. This study offers a guide to realizing blockchain's potential in different areas of supply chains, the managerial impacts, and the limitations, to evaluate whether and how blockchain can add value to a business and undertake concrete initiatives in this direction. Specifically, the primary objective of this paper is to investigate which supply chain processes and which performance dimensions are mostly affected by blockchain technology adoption under the triple-bottom-line approach of sustainability.

First, some basic concepts, characteristics, and properties of blockchain are introduced and explained to address the above research objective. After that, the paper presents major applications of blockchain, focusing on supply chain management. Following a value chain approach, qualitative research is conducted using case studies analysis based on secondary data. The qualitative analysis is organized by clustering the different processes of the supply chain (i.e., sourcing and manufacturing, inventory management, distribution and delivery, retail, customer experience, product returns, and reverse logistics). We further investigate how blockchain technology can be implemented in each process and which supply chain performance dimensions are affected. Additionally, based on qualitative research results, a theoretical framework is developed for blockchain-enhanced supply chain performance. The paper also discusses the major drawbacks and barriers to implementing blockchain to help managers better evaluate blockchain technology and its net benefits.

This paper is structured as follows: Section  2 introduces the theoretical background and contribution of the article. Section  3 discusses the methodology and data collection. Section  4 presents the case studies along with a framework of blockchain applications in supply chain management. Section  5 discusses the results, findings, and limitations of the study. Finally, Section 6  presents the study's conclusion and offers future directions.

2 Literature review and contribution

This section reviews erstwhile literature and presents the theoretical background. First, an overview of the major technical aspects of blockchain technology is provided. Second, we discuss how blockchain technology can be used across the supply chain processes and its impact on sustainable supply chain performance. This paper complements the use of traditional indicators (such as cost and quality) with contemporary supply chain performance indicators, encompassing sourcing, manufacturing, inventory, distribution, retailing, customer experience, and product returns, to provide a holistic perspective (Bhagwat and Sharma 2007 ; Gunasekaran et al. 2004 ; Cho et al. 2012 ; Golrizgashti 2014 ; Carter and Rogers 2008 ; Koberg and Longoni 2019 ; Kumar et al. 2021 ). How blockchain technology can improve supply chain performance across these indicators is discussed in detail in Section 4 . Finally, the study's unique contributions are presented based on the critical review of the literature.

2.1 Fundamentals of blockchain technology

Blockchain is built as a distributed database that stores a ledger of transactions shared across participating parties. It uses its network to authenticate transactions, and once the record has been created and approved by the network, it is cryptographically secured and stored. Once this occurs, the element cannot be altered or deleted. In this way, it creates an immutable and verified database (Maxwell and Kashni 2018 ; Azzi et al. 2019 ). Two main characteristics of blockchains that contribute to their popularity and infinite possibilities of applications are: (i) "trust" and (ii) "decentralization" (Seebacher and Schüritz 2017 ; Verhoeven et al. 2018 ). A blockchain is made trustable through its transparency (i.e., shared and verified information provided without the need of a third-party regulator), integrity (because of the cryptography and peer verification of transactions), and immutability (i.e., once a transaction is approved and recorded, it cannot be altered).

Furthermore, a blockchain has a decentralized nature, which allows for a high level of privacy for its participants, high reliability (data are shared and stored throughout the network), and versatility (its participants can integrate their own programs) (Seebacher and Schüritz 2017 ). Although blockchain was initially created (and still mainly used) as a public system, it enlarged with the years also to private systems, so that today one can distinguish between "public" (permissionless) and "private" (permissioned) blockchains. The first allows all participants to add or validate new blocks; the second allows access only to some participants, which may be necessary when, for example, a business needs to limit access to the network (Jochumsen and Chaudhuri 2018 ). More recently, two-hybrid systems have been created: "semi-private" blockchains, run by a single company that grants access to any user who qualifies, and "consortium" or "federated blockchain", where a pre-selected set of nodes controls the consensus process.

2.2 Blockchain and supply chain management

So far, most blockchain interest has been strictly related to its financial implications. Applications of blockchain technology in supply chains are still at an early stage, which represents a limit to understanding its potential, applicability, and benefits (Dutta et al. 2020 ; Cheung et al. 2021 ; Lim et al. 2021 ). In the last decade, supply chains have become more digital than ever. This transformation has been amplified and fueled by globalization, natural disasters, unpredicted events, and the increasing request for sustainability (Kopyto et al. 2020 ). As a result, it is becoming strictly necessary for supply chains to increase visibility, integration, traceability, resilience, agility, and data security (Bumblauskas et al. 2020 ; Lim et al. 2021 ; Ada et al. 2021 ; Baharmand et al. 2021 ), besides more traditional characteristics such as efficiency, speed, and quality (Carlan et al. 2022 ; Zhou et al. 2022 ). Since blockchain technology allows the integration of all supply chain members into a single secure network while sharing data and information (Dutta et al. 2020 ), scholars and practitioners have recently started exploring blockchain applications in the supply chain field.

However, the attention posed to it and its understanding is still very limited (Dutta et al. 2020 ; Lim et al. 2021 ). On the one hand, there is clearly incomplete and fragmented knowledge of blockchain applications beyond finance and cryptocurrencies (Yli-Huumo et al. 2016 ; Risius and Spohrer 2017 ; Kopyto et al. 2020 ; Tandon et al. 2021 ). Conversely, an increasing need to expand blockchain applications in other related sectors as there is great unexplored potential (Tandon et al. 2021 ). Too many companies focus on proving the technology works rather than assessing the value blockchain can bring to them (Bailey 2018 ). Current literature on blockchain technology in the supply chain reveals a dispersed knowledge of the topic, and there is a need to adopt a holistic view (Chang et al. 2020 ; Tandon et al. 2020 ; van Hoek 2020 ; Paul et al. 2021 ). Researchers have only recently started investigating blockchain technology's possible applications, concrete benefits, and challenges in the supply chain, often following a case study approach. Table 1 reviews the major studies identified in the current literature.

For each relevant study in the literature, Table 1 highlights the journal source, research objectives, the supply chain processes explored in the study, the industry sector, and the research methodology used. It can be observed that most of the studies address the upstream part of the supply chain (mainly sourcing and manufacturing) and distribution to improve transparency, the safety of the products, and traceability throughout the supply chain. So far, very little attention has been given to the role of inventory management and customers (Perboli et al. 2018 ; Ada et al. 2021 ). Nonetheless, inventory is central to guaranteeing a smooth and efficient supply chain, improving on-time delivery and customer satisfaction (Lee et al. 1997 ; Cachon and Fisher 2000 ). Similarly, evidence from the literature (e.g., Christopher and Ryals 2014 ; Ishfaq et al. 2016 ; Bumblauskas et al. 2020 ; Tönnissen and Teuteberg, 2020 ; van Hoek 2020 ) reveals how the role of customers in supply chains is becoming increasingly central. Therefore, a deeper analysis of the downstream part of the supply chain is required. Lastly, it is also found that only a few studies include reverse logistics and sustainability aspects. Given the increasing relevance of sustainability within supply chains (Di Vaio and Varriale 2020 ; Ada et al. 2021 ; Kumar et al. 2021 ; Difrancesco et al. 2022 ), it is evident that this represents a significant gap that urges to be addressed.

Concerning the industry focus, it is observed that the food industry is one of the most common (Bumblauskas et al. 2020 ; Kittipanya-ngam and Tan 2020 ; Kumar et al. 2020 ; Natanelov et al. 2022 ; Zhou et al. 2022 ), followed by the pharmaceutical and transportation sectors. The reason is that these kinds of sectors are usually connected to studies related to blockchain and product safety, trust, and traceability, which represent one of the major applications of blockchain technology to supply chains so far.

We can conclude that the current literature lacks a holistic framework: often, the papers present isolated case studies; other times mainly focus on the technical characteristic of blockchain implementation in supply chains. This evidences the need for a broader focus on blockchain technology applications that encompass the entire supply chain and highlights the link between blockchain, supply chain processes, and related performance. Based on these gaps in the literature, this paper makes one of the first attempts to develop a framework that connects the technical characteristics of blockchain on the one hand, and the supply chain processes and supply chain performance, on the contrary. Further, we explicitly match the blockchain characteristics—transparency, integrity, immutability, privacy, reliability, and versatility with the supply chain processes and performance. This study also highlights the need to identify the impact, benefits, and critical aspects of blockchain implementation for all the supply chain processes from a broader point of view.

2.3 Research gaps and contributions

Our analysis reveals the presence of emerging–yet insufficient–attention posed to blockchain applications in the supply chain. We identified several isolated case studies, focusing either on the technical aspects of blockchain implementation or on mere descriptive aspects of the case study. Only a few works leverage the benefits, the challenges, and the managerial consequences deriving from blockchain technology adoption. More specifically, no clear understanding of blockchain applicability, impact, and benefits has been analyzed in the supply chain context so far (Verhoeven et al. 2018 ; Lim et al. 2021 ). Researchers highlight the lack of a generalized view (Chang et al. 2020 ) and an unclear understanding of the coordination aspects, impact, and performance of blockchain’s application in supply chains (Tandon et al. 2020 , 2021 ). There are indeed limited studies on blockchain performance, given the topic's novelty and the difficulty of implementing it (Hong and Hales  2020 ). However, such topics are key for supply chain management (Lim et al. 2021 ), and all this represents an important disincentive for companies even to consider adopting blockchain technology.

This paper contributes to closing this gap, providing a holistic approach to analyzing blockchain technology's application and benefits in supply chain management. Our contribution is twofold. First, this paper provides an overview of the possible applications of blockchain technology in supply chain management—and a clear and structured analysis of its benefits, adopting a holistic view starting from the analysis of existing case studies and pilot projects. This study aims to help practitioners and decision-makers better understand and make strategic decisions on the design and implementation of blockchain in their supply chains. To address how blockchain can benefit supply chains, this paper adopts a value chain perspective (Porter 1985 ), analyzing the benefits at each core process of the supply chain, from sourcing to the final customer. Furthermore, to address sustainability concerns and implications, the paper takes one step further and adopts a closed-loop structure for the supply chain. Figure  1 presents the six core-processes approach followed in the analysis.

The closed-loop value chain framework (adapted from Porter 1985 )

Second, a theoretical framework is developed to identify (i) which processes of the supply chain are affected by which blockchain technical characteristics, (ii) which processes of the supply chain predominately enjoy which performance improvement due to blockchain implementation, and (iii) which blockchain technical characteristics impact which supply chain performance.

3 Methodology

This research aims to create a comprehensive understanding of blockchain technology in the supply chain. It also develops a theoretical framework for blockchain characteristics, applications, potential, and benefits for supply chains. In doing so, we adopted a practical perspective supported by a theoretical foundation that helps us identify the more relevant issues in this area. Our approach consists of three subsequent and complementary phases. First, a conceptual overview of the topic is developed to delineate a theoretical background and identify the relevant research and practical issues and the research gaps (as already presented in Section  2 ). Second, qualitative research is conducted using case studies analysis based on secondary data. Finally, a theoretical framework is built based on practice.

The case study approach is commonly used in literature for conducting qualitative research, especially exploring new phenomena (Tönnissen and Teuteberg, 2020 ), such as blockchain technology. One of the major advantages of the case study approach is that theory can be developed starting from practice (Yin 1994 ; Recker 2013 ; Kshetri 2018 ). We utilized multiple-case studies rather than a single-case study approach, representing a stronger base for theory building (Rowley 2002 ; Kshetri 2018 ). The literature suggests using around 6–10 case studies for theory building (Kshetri 2018 ; Tönnissen and Teuteberg 2020 ).

Figure  2 summarizes the major steps used in case study analysis. To select case studies, we base our analysis on the latest Gartner Supply Chain Top 25 companies list (Gartner 2021 ). Specifically, we analyzed 30 companies consisting of the top 25 of Gartner’s list, as well as the 5 "Masters", which refer to those companies recognized with "sustained supply chain excellence" (Gartner 2021 ). The 2021 Gartner list is provided in the Appendix Table 3 . Gartner is considered a leading research and advisory company in supply chain management and technology; hence, we believe it can be accepted as a trusted, well-established, and well-recognized benchmark in academia and industry. It also assures the quality and the industry variety of the cases and that the case studies are of recent implementation.

Research methodology for the case study selection and analysis

To determine which of these 30 companies are implementing projects or pilot tests involving applications of blockchain technology in their supply chains, we manually searched the companies' websites, specialized magazines, newspapers, and practitioner journals (utilizing the ProQuest database and Google). Companies that are implementing blockchain projects not directly related to supply chains (e.g., PepsiCo using Zilliqa's blockchain platform to run an advertising campaign through smart contracts; Ma 2020 ) and those companies for which we could not find any information about blockchain implementation are excluded from the analysis. Based on this selection criteria, 20 out of the initial 30 companies qualified for further analysis. After selecting the companies, the resulting cases are coded as follows. Blockchain applications for each company are classified based on Porter’s value chain framework proposed in Section  2 , identifying which part of the supply chain is tackled in the project and the potential consequences, benefits, and performance improvements deriving from it. To ensure the rigor of the analysis and unbiased results, two authors performed the search, case selection, and coding independently. In case of any inconsistency, the third author contributed to the final decision.

The major limitation of the methodology used in this research is that it is very time-consuming, as authors have to search companies' websites, magazines, newspapers, and journals manually. Although the authors did an exhaustive manual search of news, still some cases might have been missed. However, this approach produces effective and unbiased data for the analyses. Another advantage and uniqueness of the methodology adopted here is the aggregation of literature review and news/case articles to build the theoretical framework. Hardly any study exists that adopts such an approach. The following sections present and discuss the results of the analysis. Finally, building on these results, a theoretical framework is proposed matching blockchain technical characteristics with the performance at each stage of the supply chain.

4 A blockchain-enhanced supply chain performance framework

Currently, most studies and applications of blockchain are related to financial aspects and cryptocurrency or its technical feasibility (Kopyto et al. 2020 ; Tandon et al. 2021 ). However, in the last few years, experts have identified blockchain technology's great potential based on bitcoin and are extending its possible applications to other fields. This section presents and analyzes the case studies collected from the Gartner Supply Chain Top 25 companies (along with the 5 Masters) involving blockchain projects specifically addressing supply chain issues. These results are later used to develop the theoretical framework.

4.1 Benefits of blockchain technology across different processes of supply chains

This section provides an overview of the main applications of blockchain technology in supply chain management, underlying how it can help to deal with supply chain challenges, and discuss examples of its implementation. As explained in Section  2.2 , results analyses are organized following the value chain perspective.

4.1.1 Sourcing and manufacturing

Traceability throughout the supply chain has become extremely critical in the last decade. Knowing the source of all parts, having information about products' quality and quantities, and pinpointing a supplier in the case of a defective product all play a significant role in a company's daily business and in an entire supply chain (Zhou et al. 2022 ). However, tracking parts or products from their origin in a conventional way is a very difficult, costly, and time-consuming process. Blockchain technology offers the possibility to gain all this information and guarantee its truthfulness, assuring that nobody can tamper it. Everybody in the supply chain can access and track all the data concerning suppliers and products or components in real-time.

A recent experiment conducted by Walmart in collaboration with IBM shows that blockchain technology can help track a product from its origin in a matter of seconds. In December 2017, Frank Yiannas, Walmart's vice president of food safety and health, asked his employees to track a mango from its origin. It took six days, 18 h, and 26 min to get an answer. Then, they repeated the test, this time in collaboration with IBM. From the start of their journey at the farm, pallets of mangoes were tagged with numeric identifiers. Every time they crossed another checkpoint—from farm to broker to distributor to store—their status was signed and logged. With the use of blockchain technology, it took about two seconds to get the result (Hackett 2017 ). According to Frank Yiannas, after two years of preliminary tests, Walmart and its suppliers are now ready to use blockchain in the food business (Ruso 2018 ).

Similarly, McDonald's joined the China Animal Health and Food Safety Alliance (CAFA) in order to build a blockchain-based "farm-to-table" project to track its food supply chain in China (Sinclair 2020 ). Several scandals on food health safety, like baby milk containing lethal amounts of melamine or rice containing heavy metals (Staff 2016 ), have motivated China to increase the attention posed to food security, traceability, and animal health to avoid similar issues from happening again. A step forward in this direction was taken on May 2, 2018, when several car manufacturers accounting for over 70% of global vehicle production in terms of market share (including BMW, Ford, General Motors, and Renault), formed a consortium called MOBI—Mobility Open Blockchain Initiative. Its goal is to support the mobility industry in implementing blockchain solutions to improve transparency, trust, sustainability, reduced user costs, and the risk of fraud (Mobi 2021 ; Staff 2018 ).

Further, blockchain technology can help to curb forced labor, especially in manufacturing. An example comes from Coca-Cola, which is currently studying labor and land rights for its sugar supply chains to protect workers' rights at every step using blockchain technology (Gertrude 2018 ). In 2020, Nestle partnered for the first time with the Rainforest Alliance and, thanks to the IBM Food Trust blockchain technology, can trace the coffee back to the farmers (Nestle 2020 ). Customers will then be able to track all the information related to the coffee they buy, including the time of harvest and the roasting period. Nestle is also developing a project with OpenSC, a blockchain platform founded by WWF-Australia and the Boston Consulting Group Digital Ventures to guarantee transparency on the sustainability of palm oil and milk (Nestle 2019 ). More specifically, Nestle will be able to make responsible decisions supporting farmers and producers who respect environmentally sound practices and human rights.

Similarly, Starbucks recently partnered with Microsoft to develop a blockchain solution to increase trust and visibility across its coffee supply chain (Almeida 2020 ). Besides the positive effect on supply chain traceability and customers (see Section  4.1.5 ), a major benefit also concerns farmers–including the smallest, geographically dispersed farmers since they are offered the possibility to access information on their final market easily and quickly, understanding where their beans end up and in which market their products are mostly sold and requested. Blockchain technology can also support suppliers and small manufacturers and protect them, especially from big firms: it is pretty common for suppliers to be paid with delays, which causes them to struggle to get enough financial resources to anticipate the capital and carry on their business until the payment occurs. Blockchain is estimated to have a huge potential, among other industries, in the food supply chain due to the increasing need for transparency, stricter legal and health requirements, and higher consumers' consciousness.

Blockchain can also help detect and prevent fraud in the upstream supply chain. Motivated by the new requirement imposed by the US Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA), blockchain technology has entered the health industry to allow information sharing and drug serialization. Giant pharmaceutical companies like AbbVie joined the MediLedger Consortium on a blockchain project that provides tracking and transparency in the supply chain in a robust and completely secure environment. The major benefits for companies are verifying the authenticity of products, identifying and tracing back potential frauds, and improving quality and trust (Zhou et al. 2022 ). Pfizer has conducted a similar project (called "End-to-End In-Transit Visibility") in order to provide a single source of truth on its products to its stakeholders. A major problem in the pharmaceutical industry is the presence of counterfeit drugs, leading to thousands of deaths (according to the World Health Organization, 10% of drugs are counterfeit).

On the supply side, we can conclude that adopting blockchain technology can improve performance measures like costs, speed, social impacts (e.g., healthcare), risks (e.g., frauds), real-time coordination, and quality measures.

4.1.2 Inventory management

Inventory management has become increasingly complex due to the growth of stock-keeping units (SKU), multiple sourcing providers, uncertainty in delivery times, fluctuating consumer demand, delays and mistakes in the paperwork, and inaccurate or missing information. As a result, companies have seen their risk of stockout increasing and their service level downgrading, which is translated into an economic loss (e.g., emergency orders to backup suppliers, contract penalties, and potential loss of customers). To mitigate the consequences of these issues, companies tend to increase the number of units they keep in stock, with the risk of keeping excessive inventory (and therefore higher carrying costs) and, even worse, contributing to the bullwhip effect in the supply chain. Blockchain technology offers a radical, new way to approach inventory management based on the fact that no piece of inventory can exist in the same place twice. As soon as a product changes its ownership or status (e.g., from work in progress to finished goods), this information is immediately updated and made available for all the blockchain members. Similarly, all the information, purchase orders, receipts, documents, etc., are stored and shared in the same permanent ledger and shared among the participants.

Furthermore, with this technology, supply chain partners can enable the automatic execution of payments and orders. Once recorded, transactions cannot be deleted and can only be updated by those parties, verified by the system, who write valid transactions. This provides all the supply chain actors with an accurate and transparent end-to-end view of products' information, like their location, quantity, quality, and ownership. As a result, companies can improve their forecast and the traceability of parts, increase their operating efficiency, create new opportunities for just-in-time optimization, optimize inventory levels, provide higher service levels, lower warehousing costs, improve quality, and reduce errors (Zhou et al. 2022 ).

Nike piloted a blockchain project that helps its retailers track the vast amount of inventory stored at different places. The company developed a common language and streamlined communication on a common platform to instantaneously and accurately record any movement or change in product status (Das 2020 ). Another application example comes from the electronic industry, where original equipment manufacturers (OEM) find it very difficult to track products from their suppliers. While a traditional tracking system is bounded within a single organization, a blockchain system allows cross-company tracking from the supplier's production line to the OEM warehouse. This way, organizations can spot sudden disruptions or bottlenecks as they occur and detect anomalies or fraudulent activities (IBM 2017 ). For example, Lenovo is optimizing the inventory procurement process in its supply chain using blockchain. The process of managing orders and invoices was previously based on paper, generating errors and leading to data loss. With the help of blockchain, the entire process has been moved to a secure platform so that every authorized party can access accurate and trusted records. The results show a significant improvement in terms of visibility, transparency, efficiency, speed, and revenue growth while decreasing costs. Blockchain technology can help control and monitor all product requirements throughout the supply chain and revise expiration dates based on this information, making it possible to use resources that otherwise would go wasted.

4.1.3 Distribution and delivery

Today's consumers are increasing more and more their expectations, demanding the product they want "right here, right now". In the last decade, the situation has become even more critical due to the explosive growth of online commerce, adding the challenge of fast and cheap (if not free) deliveries, detailed and accurate real-time information about orders, a trusted environment for cross-border trade, and personalized services. One of the key challenges to a company's success is properly managing its distribution system. Transportation and shipping companies have recently shown an increasing interest in blockchain and its application to transportation because it can help track and monitor all kinds of shipments and transactions throughout the supply chain, speeding up the paperwork and guaranteeing trust.

Companies like Alibaba and Walmart are exploring how blockchain can benefit their logistics thanks to its high level of visibility, transparency, and safety of transactions. Alibaba has recently started collaborating with New Zealand Post and Fonterra to track customers' orders using blockchain. The aim is to increase transparency and consumer confidence in response to the significant fraud challenge. In the case of positive results, Alibaba will consider implementing the system in its online marketplace (Shaw 2018 ). Walmart is analyzing how blockchain can automate and speed up its deliveries using a drone with a blockchain identifier: as the drone approaches the delivery box, the box itself reads the identifier, and if the code is valid, it opens and accepts the package. It would trigger a notification to the consumer's mobile device. Furthermore, all information related to the delivery (like time, location, temperature, etc.) would be stored and verified throughout the supply chain (Staff 2018 ). Similarly, L'Oreal is currently testing two pilot projects using blockchain technology to increase transparency and streamline international shipments with all the necessary paperwork (Haywood Queen and Brune 2019 ).

Finally, blockchain can help identify and prevent fraud in logistics. In this context, the most critical processes are usually transportation and change of ownership because criminals can tamper or provide fake documentation to pick up goods or introduce counterfeit products. Intel has introduced the "Intel Connected Logistics Platform", which allows users to track their shipments and monitor the condition of their products, like temperature and stock information. This platform can be very useful for those companies shipping fragile products or products with particular temperature requirements. Since both parties can access real-time information about the shipped product, disputes between carriers and shippers can be drastically reduced (Aouad 2018 ).

4.1.4 Retail

As retailers struggle in a margin-squeezed environment to obtain more results with fewer resources, the potential for blockchain to reduce operating costs is very promising (Weldon et al. 2017 ). According to a recent survey conducted on 321 European and North-American retail organizations, blockchain adoption is expected to cut costs by more than 2.5% according to 82% of respondents, while 36% said they believe the savings will be greater than 5%; and much of these cost savings could result from automation (Weldon et al. 2017 ). Another critical issue for retailers is the ability to prove the authenticity of their products, which is especially true in the food industry, luxury brands, or artwork. We have largely discussed in Section  4.1.3 blockchain’s capability to track items' provenance throughout the supply chain, allowing retailers to access all the information concerning products. It helps them prove the authenticity of the items they sell or supports them in containing a food outbreak. Recall the example of Walmart discussed in Section  4.1.1 ; the retailer was able to provide accurate and real-time information to its customer about the mangos sold in its retail store. Another application of blockchain technology for retailers concerns payment methodology and acceptancy of crypto-currency payments. Global companies, including Coca-Cola, Amazon, and Starbucks, have recently introduced bitcoin payments in some of their markets, either directly or indirectly, through bitcoin-paid vouchers and gift cards (Tayeb 2021 ). It allows faster, cheaper, and safer payments (Deloitte 2021 ).

Ultimately, blockchain can also contribute to sustainability, offering retailers a way to contribute to environmental projects. This is the case of Ben & Jerry's, Unilever's subsidiary ice cream brand that introduced a retail platform based on blockchain technology in collaboration with Poseidon to allow customers to rebalance their purchases' carbon footprint (Smith 2018 ; Poseidon Foundation 2021 ). Poseidon's solution was tested in the Ben & Jerry's Scoop Store in London's Soho district and was based on the energy-efficient Stellar blockchain. Traditionally, environmentally responsible companies buy carbon credits to offset the greenhouse gasses deriving from their operations. The outcome is employed in developing environmental projects, like planting new forests or building new wind farms. However, this can be possible only on a big scale, it has a high barrier to entry, and the whole process is not at all transparent for customers. As a result, Poseidon's platform is based on decomposing carbon credits into micro-transactions that can be associated with every scoop of ice cream. In this way, the whole process is visible and transparent, and people can see the direct impact of their action, both environmental and economic ("on a $3 cup of coffee the carbon offset would cost less than two cents"; Smith 2018 ). Although it appears pretty clear that blockchain technology will transform the retail industry, many retailers are still reluctant to engage in this activity. They prefer to wait for the technology to be consolidated and fully ready to be implemented. Instead, retailers should take action today to ensure they are not left behind by competitors, keeping in mind that early adopters will also influence the development of networks and their rules (Weldon et al. 2017 ).

4.1.5 Customers' experience

The implications of blockchain technology for customers are numerous. Because of traceability, customers can get all the information about the item they buy, whether their mobile phone involves child labor or conflict-free resources, verify if the organic food they are buying is really respecting all the necessary requirements, and so on. This results in increased trust towards retailers and suppliers and increases customers' perceived value. In recent years, some studies (e.g., Sodhi and Tang 2019 ) showed how the customer's perceived value for a product or a service and customer's willingness to pay increase when firms disclose information, for example, on the production process or the employees' working conditions. This enhances the need for supply chain traceability and transparency, especially in some kinds of industries that are more affected by social and environmental scandals.

For example, 3 M Company recently developed a new solution with blockchain on Microsoft Azure to improve customers' accountability and visibility across its supply chain, enhancing brand loyalty and increasing customer safety (Microsoft 2018 ). This solution also increases trust and real-time visibility among all supply chain members. It helps identify and prevent fraudulent products from entering the supply chains, which is a big concern, especially in the pharmaceutical industry, regarding high cost (to identify and replace counterfeit products) and customer safety. Furthermore, since blockchain technology can be used to track shipments throughout the supply chain, it allows customers to access in real-time all the information related to their order status as it moves from one stage to the following one, enhancing customers' experience.

Starbucks also launched a pilot project with Microsoft to share with customers information about the coffee they buy, including data about the farm their coffee comes from, intending to increase trust and especially attract the younger generations who are particularly sensitive to environmental and social aspects (Almeida 2020 ). Blockchain affects all kinds of transactions between a business and a customer, like payments and refunds, which, in this way, become faster, safer, and cheaper (Deloitte 2021 ). Blockchain can also help enhance customer loyalty and rewards programs that encourage repeat purchases and provide companies with invaluable insights into their customers' buying behaviors. On the other hand, it protects retailers from the risk of coupon fraud. An example comes from the Coupon Bureau, a non-profit organization connecting all stakeholders to the digital coupon offer file whose advisory committee also includes members of General Mills (Coupon Bureau 2021 ). Over the last decade, one of the biggest challenges for the coupon system has been the lack of security and trust and the absence of a unified centralized solution to validate offers. The solution is developing a common blockchain-based platform that provides a real-time secure log for all coupons. All stakeholders can then validate when coupons are redeemed securely (Pollock 2020 ). It can be concluded that blockchain technology would benefit the entire relationship with customer-business, improving the accessibility and accuracy of the information, increasing the speed and trust of transactions, and reducing costs while simultaneously guaranteeing a higher level of privacy protection.

4.1.6 Product returns and reverse logistics

Similar to what happens in the forward network, blockchain technology can be used to manage the reverse supply chain through tracking, visibility, and accuracy of information. Since blockchain creates a trusted environment through the integrity and immutability of its data, it can be applied to the resale marketplace, demonstrating the authenticity of products sold on second-hand markets and increasing trust among buyers. Walmart has just released a new patent that details a blockchain ledger to track items sold to customers. The system would allow a customer to register the purchase of an item and then choose a resale price, with the system acting as a digital marketplace (Pymnts 2018 ).

Blockchain can help deal with defective goods and product returns. An interesting example comes from the automotive industry— when a part is found to be defective, car manufacturers need to recall all the vehicles of a specific model and year because they cannot identify every part in every vehicle sold. It is usually very costly and harmful for the company, especially considering that the defective part can actually be fitted in just several hundred vehicles (for example, consider BMW's global recall of 1.6 million vehicles in 2018; Behrmann 2018 ). A blockchain-based system would allow the manufacturer to identify every single part of a vehicle and, in case of a recall, drastically save cost and time by recalling and repairing just the defective ones (Jones 2017 ). Blockchain can also mitigate the risk of fraud in product returns; in 2017, a woman cheated Amazon India for almost 900,000€. She was purchasing expensive electronic products from the company; simultaneously, she bought a cheap duplicate of the same product and then claimed refunds for Amazon's delivered products after returning the inexpensive duplicate (Petlee 2017 ). Implementing a blockchain system would prevent the possibility of returning a product different than the one originally purchased. Finally, blockchain can help track recycled material's origin and composition and prove its authenticity. Dell Technologies collaborates with software company VMware to track and trace the recycled components in its supply chain. Dell's supply chain has a strong presence in Southeast Asia, which is also responsible for 60% of ocean plastic (Insights 2019 ). In this way, Dell can create a circular economy by directly controlling and measuring the content of plastic entering the oceans.

On the other hand, customers can have information on the recycled material their laptop is made from and its origin. As already presented in Section  4.1.1 , AbbVie has recently joined the MediLedger consortium in a blockchain project that enables participants to track and verify product authenticity. Another application of this project is to address the critical issue of saleable returns in the pharmaceutical industry— with a closed blockchain system, only manufacturers can attach unique identifiers to the products. At the same time, companies can verify anytime who touched what drug and at what time. As a result, returned items in the appropriate conditions may still be resold in total security.

Table 2 provides a visual summary of the key benefits and performance improvements deriving from the blockchain technology implementation at different stages of the supply chain. We reference the comparative case study for each supply chain process-measure combination.

4.2 The theoretical framework for blockchain implementation in supply chains

We next employ the findings from the qualitative research to develop a theoretical framework for blockchain-based supply chains. In particular, we match the blockchain technical characteristics (as described in Section  2.1 ) with the supply chain performance implications (identified from the case studies analysis in Section  4.1 ), following the value chain approach defined in Section  2.2 . We report in Fig.  3 the theoretical framework proposed.

Theoretical framework for blockchain implementation in supply chains

The top part of Fig.  3 is built based on the literature review and covers the characteristics of blockchain technology. Next, we match these characteristics across the supply chain processes (in the central part of Fig.  3 ) with the case studies. Specifically, we identify how case companies have used blockchain technology in their supply chains and its impact on their supply chain processes' performance. For example, we looked for the immutability characteristic of blockchain in all collected case studies and analyzed how and which supply chain processes it affects. A similar approach is used for the other characteristics. Finally, the bottom part of Fig.  3 presents the performance implications of blockchain technology implementation across the supply chain processes. These performance implications are derived primarily from case studies' analyses and supported by the literature (e.g., Di Vaio and Varriale 2020 ; Kumar et al. 2021 ; Difrancesco et al. 2022 ).

The analysis reveals that transparency, integrity, and reliability affect each stage of the supply chain and hence are the most relevant blockchain characteristics for supply chains. The results show that privacy is important for downstream supply chain members, such as distributors, retailers, and customers. The decentralized nature of blockchain offers privacy to supply chain members. The immutability of data mainly involves information related to the status and ownership of a product throughout the supply chain. Hence, it affects both the upstream (e.g., sourcing and manufacturing) and downstream (e.g., warehousing, distribution, and reverse logistics) supply chain processes. The versatility characteristic affects inventory and reverse logistics processes and allows supply chain members to integrate their own programs to improve their responsiveness to customers’ needs (Seebacher and Schüritz 2017 ; Fernández-Caramés et al. 2019 ).

Concerning performance, it is found that blockchain technology can significantly improve supply chain performance. In particular, some of the most common benefits of blockchain implementation are the increase in trust, visibility, transparency, and speed, which affect all processes from the upstream to the downstream supply chain. Also, we note an important improvement in cost and quality at almost any stage of the supply chain. This finding is consistent with the literature (Zhou et al. 2022 ).

Moreover, blockchain technology can improve supply chain sustainability performance both upstream (in the sourcing phase) and downstream (involving the actors related to the reverse logistics process and sustainability awareness). The performance improvement is grounded in blockchain technical characteristics, especially the transparency, integrity, and reliability. Furthermore, it is observed that visibility, representing a major criticality in supply chains (Heese 2007 ; O’Marah et al. 2014 ; Buell et al. 2016 ; Deloitte 2021 ), can be restored thanks to blockchain.

5 Discussion and managerial implications

This section discusses the managerial implications of the results. It also presents the significant barriers and limitations in blockchain adoption. Our analysis reveals that blockchain implementation can largely benefit supply chains.

According to the theoretical framework and consistent with the literature (Baharmand et al. 2021 ; Liu et al. 2021 ), transparency, integrity, and reliability significantly affect all parties and related processes across the supply chain. These three characteristics of blockchain are vital for successful supply chains. The immutability characteristic of blockchain affects both upstream and downstream supply chain processes. Surprisingly, we did not find evidence of this affecting the retailing process. Privacy is a major concern, mainly for the downstream members of supply chains. It is a characteristic that primarily involves customers and those actors that–directly or indirectly–interface with customers (like retailers and distributors). Customers are indeed posing increasing attention to privacy issues and expect retailers to guarantee a high level of data protection. The versatility characteristic is important for parties who deal with inventory and reverse logistics processes. Supply chain members involved with these processes need more flexibility to adapt and respond to the dynamic demands of customers. With blockchain implementation, participants can integrate their own programs to quickly improve their responsiveness to customers’ needs.

There are different indicators that affect the supply chain performance. As identified in the proposed theoretical framework (see Fig.  3 ), cost, speed, trust, visibility, and transparency are the most important performance indicators affecting most supply chain members. Similar to previous studies (Bumblauskas et al. 2020 ; Ada et al. 2021 ; Baharmand et al. 2021 ; Liu et al. 2021 ; Carlan et al. 2022 ), we find that blockchain helps decrease the cost and the time of sharing information and data among parties, making product visibility and tracking cheaper and easier. Further, as evident from the theoretical framework, inventory and warehousing costs can be reduced thanks to a truthful blockchain-based inventory system, which allows any parties in the supply chain to access the accurate inventory data and, therefore, optimize inventory policies while reducing stockout risks. Similarly, with blockchain implementation, cost and time related to the delivery process can be decreased since real-time trustable transactions can easily replace the associated paperwork. This aspect is becoming more and more relevant due to the globalization of supply chains and the frequent transshipment of cargo among different transportation modes and countries (Carlan et al. 2022 ). As a reference example, a single container shipped from East Africa to Europe may require up to 30 people to deal with the stamps and approvals (Popper and Lohr 2017 ). Knowing that about 90% of goods in global trade are carried by the ocean shipping industry each year (Mearian 2018 ), we can easily get a rough idea of how costly, time-consuming, and risky (e.g., documents lost or fraud) this can become. Additionally, a container can be stacked at port for days because of a missing paper, although the container can be loaded on a ship in a matter of minutes. Moreover, blockchain technology allows instantaneous, truthful, and cheaper payment transactions among supply chain parties (e.g., payment from customers or suppliers).

Furthermore, it is observed that visibility (especially as one moves far from the manufacturer) has been identified as one of the major issues in supply chains (Heese 2007 ; O’Marah et al. 2014 ; Buell et al. 2016 ; Deloitte 2021 ). Blockchain implementation can restore visibility, even while moving far from the manufacturer (retailer and customers). Also, blockchain enhances trust among supply chain parties, which is particularly significant if one considers the critical role of supply chain collaboration and trust among parties (e.g., Iyer and Ye 2000 ; Cachon 2004 ; Beske et al. 2014 ; Kumar et al. 2021 ).

Further, it is found that product quality and perceived customers’ value are important in upstream and downstream supply chain processes. Blockchain technology offers the ability to prove that products comply with legal standards and requirements. Sharing accurate real-time information allows for fraud detection and prevention, decreasing the burden deriving from frauds in the supply chain, and early detection of bottlenecks, disruptions, quality issues, or mistakes at any stage of the supply chain. Since blockchain is characterized by the integrity and immutability of real-time data (see Fig.  3 ), it allows supply chain members to share real-time trustable information about products, ownership, and transactions at any time across the supply chain stages. With more visibility and transparency across the supply chain, members can also trace back to each component source to detect any required information or anomalies in a matter of seconds. Moreover, blockchain technology can improve customers' experience and perceived service level due to the accurate information that manufacturers, distributors, or retailers can provide to customers, e.g., on their order status or the available in-stock inventory. Also, with the help of blockchain, customers can be guaranteed the authenticity and the safety of the product they buy and securely reward programs. Improving the perceived quality of customers' experience is a key differentiator in today's global and competitive environment (Zhou et al. 2022 ), where customers continuously increase their expectations and demand for a fast, convenient, and fully integrated experience (Kopyto et al. 2020 ).

As inferred from our theoretical framework, when we enlarge the analysis encompassing more comprehensive performance measurements, blockchain can positively affect new indicators (i.e., sustainability). Results show that blockchain technology also improves sustainability by enhancing the traceability of products, improving quality, and detecting fraud. This finding is consistent with the literature (Di Vaio and Varriale 2020 ). Like in the forward supply chain, blockchain allows collecting any information concerning the reverse flow of materials, including the quality status and composition of returned products for resales/reuse and fraudulent behavior. It increases trust from reverse flow users and enhances the creation of a circular economy. At the same time, blockchain fosters sustainable initiatives for supply chains and customers' sensitivity to sustainability, providing the means to track every single product throughout the supply chain and verify its actual footprint. Social aspects such as forced and child labor detection, workers' rights protection, and customers' health and safety can be verified along with environmental issues. It can be concluded that blockchain technology has the potential to improve sustainable supply chain performance under a more holistic and triple-bottom-line point of view, moving from traditional performance indicators such as cost and speed to a more comprehensive performance measurement framework that includes trust, visibility, transparency, customers' experience, and sustainability.

Despite the great benefits of blockchain technology discussed so far, blockchain also comes with several drawbacks and entails risks and limitations. One intrinsic limit of blockchain derives from its young age. Since it is a relatively new technology, managers are often skeptical, especially when they have to invest a significant amount of money. As revealed by a recent survey conducted by Ernst and Young ( 2018 ), complex regulation is the most significant barrier to widespread blockchain adoption. Another important aspect required for the adoption of blockchain is that all parties should be involved in its adoption. For example, it would not be helpful if only one supplier implements blockchain technology while the other supply chain partners do not. Furthermore, another important issue is related to data protection and privacy concerns. For example, some countries' current privacy legislation (e.g., the European Union's new General Data Protection Regulation; GDPR 2018 ) requires that users have the right to request the erasure of personal data related to them (the "right of erasure", previously called the "right to be forgotten"). However, one of the main characteristics of blockchain is its data's permanency, which makes it impossible, at least in public systems, to follow this directive. Additionally, blockchain technology significantly impacts energy consumption and sustainability because of the high computing power required for its implementation and running. Furthermore, especially in global supply chain environments where suppliers are often located in developing countries, access to the required technology and energy supply can be prohibitive.

6 Conclusions and directions for future research

Most previous studies on blockchain applications in supply chains involve the upstream part of the supply chain (sourcing and manufacturing) and distribution. This paper complements the literature by addressing all supply chain processes, from sourcing to reverse logistics. Among these, we highlight the involvement of the central role of customers in supply chains, which has been identified as one of the major drivers in today’s supply chains (Christopher and Ryals 2014 ; Ishfaq et al. 2016 ). Also, our focus on reverse logistics and sustainability answers the call for increasing attention to sustainability issues in global supply chains (Kumar et al. 2021 ; Difrancesco et al. 2022 ). Further, as opposed to isolated case studies, often focusing on the technical characteristics of blockchain, this study offers a holistic framework incorporating and matching the blockchain technical characteristics, its applications in the supply chain processes, and performance improvements.

This paper aims to help academics and practitioners understand and make strategic decisions on the design, implementation, and benefits evaluation of blockchain technology in different supply chain sectors. We conducted qualitative research by analyzing case studies related to the Gartner Top 25 list of companies. Each case study was analyzed following the Porter value chain approach. In particular, six core functions related to supply chain processes for blockchain applications were identified: sourcing and manufacturing, inventory management, distribution and delivery, retail, customers' experience, and product returns and reverse logistics. We then discussed the supply chain performance improvements deriving from adopting blockchain technology for each supply chain process. Next, a theoretical framework was built for blockchain-enhanced supply chain performance based on qualitative research results. Finally, the major drawbacks deriving from blockchain adoption were discussed.

This paper contributes to the emerging literature on blockchain technology applications in the supply chain area by providing structured qualitative research based on 20 case studies collected from different industries. We highlighted the implications, benefits, and challenges deriving from blockchain implementation and how blockchain technical characteristics tackle each supply chain process. This study’s results show managers how blockchain can be implemented at any stage of the supply chain and unveils the relevant potential benefits of the supply chain performance metrics. In particular, blockchain implementation can help managers structure and improve their network of relationships among the supply chain partners, improve collaboration, and provide efficient, real-time, and trustable resource and information sharing. This research supports managers in making long-term, well-informed strategic decisions based on reliable data, investing in collaborative activities with other supply chain partners, and providing a better customer experience.

Moreover, due to its property of visibility, data integrity, and traceability, blockchain enhances the development of sustainable supply chains, particularly the environmental and social dimensions that represent a critical issue, especially in global and geographically dispersed networks. Managers should also be aware of the limitations and drawbacks of blockchain technology to evaluate the net benefit derived from its implementation. Similar to any other study, this paper also has some limitations. First, although based on well-recognized and solid supply chains, this study can be extended to encompass a larger number of companies. Second, although the identified case studies mainly focus on global companies, analyzing how our findings change when including local and small-medium enterprises would be interesting. Finally, due to the topic's novelty and the field's extremely dynamic nature, most companies are still at the very early stage of blockchain implementation or driving pilot projects. Therefore, we stress the need to continue working in this direction and monitor the projects' advancement over time to derive a deeper analysis and more robust results. More studies and research are expected on blockchain technology in the supply chain management field in the coming years. It is clear indeed that, despite the novelty of the topic and "regardless of the price of bitcoin, blockchain technology is here to stay" (Di Gregorio  2018 ).

Ada N, Ethirajan M, Kumar A et al (2021) Blockchain technology for enhancing traceability and efficiency in automobile supply chain—a case study. Sustain 13:1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413667

Article   Google Scholar  

Almeida I (2020) Starbucks clients can now trace their coffee, and so can farmers.  https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-08-25/starbucks-clients-can-now-trace-their-coffee-and-so-can-farmers . Accessed 10 Sept 2021

Aouad A (2018) Pfizer and Intel are working on supply chain visibility. Business Insider

Awaysheh A, Klassen RD (2010) The impact of supply chain structure on the use of supplier socially responsible practices. Int J Oper Prod Manag 30:1246–1268

Azzi R, Chamoun RK, Sokhn M (2019) The power of a blockchain-based supply chain. Comput Ind Eng 135:582–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.06.042

Baharmand H, Maghsoudi A, Coppi G (2021) Exploring the application of blockchain to humanitarian supply chains: insights from Humanitarian Supply Blockchain pilot project. Int J Oper Prod Manag 41:1522–1543. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-12-2020-0884

Bailey G (2018) The Year Of The Digital Supply Chain. In: Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/georgebailey1/2018/12/20/theyear-of-the-digital-supply-chain/?sh=7ed062f934cf . Accessed 15 Jul 2019

Behrmann E (2018) Bmw expands recall of vehicles risk of fire to 16 million cars. Bloomberg

Beske P, Land A, Seuring S (2014) Sustainable supply chain management practices and dynamic capabilities in the food industry: a critical analysis of the literature. Int J Prod Econ 152:131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.026

Bhagwat R, Sharma MK (2007) Performance measurement of supply chain management: A balanced scorecard approach. Comput Ind Eng 53:43–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2007.04.001

Brookbanks M, Parry G (2022) The impact of a blockchain platform on trust in established relationships: a case study of wine supply chains. Supply Chain Manag 27:128–146. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-05-2021-0227

Buell R, Kim T, Tsay C (2016) Creating Reciprocal Value Through Operational Transparency. Manage Sci 63(6):1673–1695. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2411

Bumblauskas D, Mann A, Dugan B, Rittmer J (2020) A blockchain use case in food distribution: Do you know where your food has been? Int J Inf Manage 52:102008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.09.004

Cachon G (2004) The allocation of inventory risk in a supply chain: push, pull and advance-purchase discount contracts. Manage Sci 50:222–238

Cachon G, Fisher M (2000) Supply chain inventory management and the value of shared information. Manage Sci 46:1032–1048

Cao S, Foth M, Powell W et al (2022) A blockchain-based multisignature approach for supply chain governance: A use case from the Australian beef industry. Blockchain Res Appl 3:100091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcra.2022.100091

Carlan V, Sys C, Vanelslander T (2022) Cost-effectiveness and gain-sharing scenarios for purchasing a blockchain-based application in the maritime supply chain. Eur Transp Res Rev 14(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-022-00545-2

Carter CR, Rogers DS (2008) A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 38(5):360–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810882816

Casado-Vara R, Prieto J, De la Prieta F, Corchado JM (2018) How blockchain improves the supply chain: Case study alimentary supply chain. Procedia Comput Sci 134:393–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.07.193

Chang Y, Iakovou E, Shi W (2020) Blockchain in global supply chains and cross-border trade: A critical synthesis of the state-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities. Int J Prod Res 58

Cheung KF, Bell MGH, Bhattacharjya J (2021) Cybersecurity in logistics and supply chain management: An overview and future research directions. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 146:102217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102217

Cho DW, Lee YH, Ahn SH, Hwang MK (2012) A framework for measuring the performance of service supply chain management. Comput Ind Eng 62:801–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2011.11.014

Christopher M, Ryals LJ (2014) The supply chain becomes the demand chain. J Bus Logist 35:29–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12037

Coupon Bureau (2021) Blockchain-backed universal digital coupon moves into next phase. https://www.thecouponbureau.org/news . Accessed 20 Oct 2021

Das A (2020) Nike partners with Blockchain supply chain startup Pluton. In: Bravenewcoin. https://bravenewcoin.com/insights/nike-partners-with-blockchain-supply-chain-startup-pluton

Deloitte (2021) The rise of using cryptocurrency in business. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/audit/articles/corporatesusing-crypto.html . Accessed 6 Oct 2021

Di Gregorio C (2018) Blockchain: The 2018 disruptor of the year. In: Technology. https://technologymagazine.com/enterpriseit/blockchain-2018-disruptor-year . Accessed 6 Oct 2020

Di Vaio A, Varriale L (2020) Blockchain technology in supply chain management for sustainable performance: Evidence from the airport industry. Int J Inf Manage 52:102014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.09.010

Difrancesco RM, Meena P, Tibrewala R (2021) Buyback and risk-sharing contracts to mitigate the supply and demand disruption risks. Eur J Ind Eng 15:550

Difrancesco RM, Luzzini D, Patrucco AS (2022) Purchasing realized absorptive capacity as the gateway to sustainable supply chain management. Int J Oper Prod Manag 42:603–636. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-10-2021-0627

Dutta P, Choi T, Somani S, Butala R (2020) Blockchain technology in supply chain operations : Applications, challenges and research opportunities. Transp Res Part E 142:102067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102067

Earley K (2013) Supply chain transparency: forging better relationships with suppliers. Guard

Ernst and Young (2018) Regulatory complexity is the greatest barrier to widespread blockchain adoption, while regulatory changes are the primary driver of broader integration, according to EY poll. https://www.ey.com/en_gl/news/2018/06/regulatorycomplexity-is-the-greatest-barrier-to-widespread . Accessed 7 Oct 2020

Fernández-Caramés TM, Blanco-Novoa O, Froiz-Míguez I, Fraga-Lamas P (2019) Towards an autonomous industry 4.0 warehouse: A UAV and blockchain-based system for inventory and traceability applications in big data-driven supply chain management. Sensors 19(10):2394. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19102394

Gartner (2018) How governments can unlock blockchains potential. https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/how-governments-can-unlock-blockchains-potential/ . Accessed 3 Nov 2019

Gartner (2021) Gartner announces rankings of the 2021 supply chain top 25. https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/pressreleases/2021-05-19-gartner-announces-rankings-of-the-2021-supply-chain-top-25 . Accessed 5 Oct 2021

GDPR (2018) General Data Protection Regulation. http://gdpr.eu/ . Accessed 19 Oct 2020

Gertrude CD (2018) Coca-Cola, U.S. State Dept to use blockchain to combat forced labor. Reuter

Golrizgashti S (2014) Supply chain value creation methodology under BSC approach. J Ind Eng Int 10(3):1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40092-014-0067-5

Gunasekaran A, Patel C, McGaughey RE (2004) A framework for supply chain performance measurement. Int J Prod Econ 87:333–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.08.003

Hackett R (2017) Wal-mart explores blockchain for delivery drones. In: Fortune. https://fortune.com/2017/05/30/walmartblockchain-drones-patent/ . Accessed 6 Jan 2020

Haywood Queen K and Brune B (2019) SAP, Intel, IBM, Microsoft, Dow Chemical, DMDII, L’Oréal, ITAMCO, Akeoplus, Siemens, Rockwell also try blockchain on for size. https://www.sme.org/smemedia/sme-media/in-blockchain-we-trust/sap-intelibm-microsoft-dow-chemical-dmdii-loreal-itamco-akeoplus-siemens-rockwell-also-try-blockchain-on-for-size/ . Accessed 20 Oct 2021

Heese S (2007) Inventory record inaccuracy, double marginalization, and RFID adoption. Prod Oper Manag 16(5):542–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2007.tb00279.x

Helo P, Shamsuzzoha AHM (2020) Real-time supply chain—A blockchain architecture for project deliveries. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 63:101909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101909

Hong L, Hales DN (2020) Blockchain performance in supply chain management: application in blockchain integration companies. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-10-2020-0598

IBM (2017) Blockchain benefits for electronics. https://www.ibm.com/thought-leadership/institute-businessvalue/report/blockchainelectronics# . Accessed 1 Oct 2020

Insights L (2019) Dell using VMware’s blockchain to track recycled packaging. https://www.ledgerinsights.com/dell-vmware-blockchain-recycled-plastic/

Ishfaq R, Gibson B, Defee C (2016) How retailers are getting ready for an omnichannel world. Supply Chain Q 2:1–6

Google Scholar  

Iyer A, Ye J (2000) Assessing the value of information sharing in a promotional retail environment. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 2(2):128–143. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2.2.128.12350

Jochumsen ML, Chaudhuri A (2018) Blockchain’s ipact on supply chain of a pharmaceutical company. Work Pap Aalborg Univ Copenhagen

Jones M (2017) Internet of things iot - blockchain automotive industry. https://www.ibm.com/blogs/internet-of-things/iot-blockchain-automotive-industry/

Jovanovic M, Kostić N, Sebastian IM, Sedej T (2022) Managing a blockchain-based platform ecosystem for industry-wide adoption: The case of TradeLens. Technol Forecast Soc Change 184:121981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121981

Kaijun L, Ya B, Linbo J et al (2018) Research on agricultural supply chain system with double chain architecture based on blockchain technology. Futur Gener Comput Syst 86:641–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.04.061

Kittipanya-ngam P, Tan KH (2020) A framework for food supply chain digitalization: lessons from Thailand. Prod Plan Control 31:158–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1631462

Koberg E, Longoni A (2019) A systematic review of sustainable supply chain management in global supply chains. J Clean Prod 207:1084–1098

Kopyto M, Lechler S, von der Gracht H, Hartmann E (2020) Potentials of blockchain technology in supply chain management: Long-term judgments of an international expert panel. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 161:120330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120330

Kshetri N (2018) Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives. Int J Inf Manage 39:80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.005

Kumar A, Liu R, Shan Z (2020) Is blockchain a silver bullet for supply chain management? Technical challenges and research opportunities. Decis Sci 51:8–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12396

Kumar G, Meena P, Difrancesco RM (2021) How do collaborative culture and capability improve sustainability? J Clean Prod 291:125824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125824

Kurpjuweit S, Schmidt CG, Klöckner M, Wagner SM (2021) Blockchain in additive manufacturing and its impact on supply chains. J Bus Logist 42:46–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12231

Lee H, Padmanabhan V, Whang S (1997) Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect. Manage Sci 43:546–558

Lim MK, Li Y, Wang C, Tseng M (2021) Computers & industrial engineering a literature review of blockchain technology applications in supply chains: A comprehensive analysis of themes, methodologies and industries. Comput Ind Eng 154:107133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107133

Liu X, Barenji AV, Li Z et al (2021) Blockchain-based smart tracking and tracing platform for drug supply chain. Comput Ind Eng 161:107669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107669

Ma R (2020) How blockchain tech is solving problems in the supply chain Sector. Forbes

Mandolla C, Petruzzelli AM, Percoco G, Urbinati A (2019) Building a digital twin for additive manufacturing through the exploitation of blockchain: A case analysis of the aircraft industry. Comput Ind 109:134–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.04.011

Maxwell S, Kashni S (2018) Building supply management with blockchain 50(7). ISE Mag. https://www.iise.org/ISEMagazine/details.aspx?id=46930 . Accessed 5 Oct 2020

Mearian L (2018) Blockchain moves into top spot for hottest job skills. Comput world

Microsoft (2018) 3M explores new label-as-a-service concept with blockchain on Azure to stop counterfeit pharmaceuticals. https://customers.microsoft.com/it-it/story/blockchain-3m

Mobi (2021) Building the new economy of movement. https://dlt.mobi/

Myerson P (2018) Un-Block your supply chain. Ind Week

Natanelov V, Cao S, Foth M, Dulleck U (2022) Blockchain smart contracts for supply chain finance: Mapping the innovation potential in Australia-China beef supply chains. J Ind Inf Integr 30:100389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2022.100389

Nestle (2019) Nestlé breaks new ground with open blockchain pilot. https://www.nestle.com/media/pressreleases/allpressreleases/nestle-open-blockchain-pilot . Accessed 1 Sep 2020

Nestle (2020) Nestlé expands blockchain to Zoégas coffee brand. https://www.nestle.com/media/news/nestle-blockchain-zoegas-coffee-brand . Accessed 4 Jan 2021

Niels H, Moritz P (2017) Blockchain in logistics and supply chain: trick or Treat? Digit Supply Chain Manag Logist

O’Marah K, Geraint J, Blake B, Manenti P (2014) The chief supply chain report 2014

Paul T, Mondal S, Islam N, Rakshit S (2021) The impact of blockchain technology on the tea supply chain and its sustainable performance. Technol Forecast Soc Change 173:121163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121163

Perboli G, Musso S, Rosano M (2018) Blockchain in logistics and supply chain : a lean approach for designing real-world use cases. IEEE Access 6:62018–62028. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2875782

Petlee P (2017) Woman cons Amazon of Rs 70 lakh, arrested. The Times of India

Pollock D (2020) Target, general mills getting look in at Hadera blockchain technology through couponing. In: Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/darrynpollock/2020/04/27/target-general-mills-getting-look-in-at-hedera-blockchain-technology-through-couponing/?sh=7f42b0a84023

Popper N, Lohr S (2017) Blockchain: A better way to track pork chops, bonds, bad peanuts butter? New York Times

Porter E (1985) Competitive Advantage. The Free Press, New York

Poseidon Foundation (2021) Putting a Price on Climate Change. https://poseidon.eco/ . Accessed 23 Oct 2021

Pymnts (2018) Walmart files blockchain patent to keep track of customer purchases. Pymnts

Recker, J (2013). Scientific research in information systems: a beginner's guide. Berlin: Springer.

Risius M, Spohrer K (2017) A blockchain research framework. Bus Inf Syst Eng 59:385–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0506-0

Rowley J (2002) Using case studies in research. Manag Res News 25:16–27

Ruso C (2018) Walmart is getting suppliers to put food on the blockchain. Cryptocurrencies

Seebacher S, Schüritz R (2017) Blockchain technology as an enabler of service systems: A structured literature review. In: Exploring Services Science. IESS 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Springer

Selk A (2018) Dozens sickened in new multistate salmonella outbreak, this time traced to pre-cut melons. Washington Post

Shaw A (2018) Alibaba, Fonterra and NZ Post team up to track orders using blockchain technology. Nzherald

Sinclair S (2020) VeChain to supply blockchain tech for Chinese food safety group that includes McDonald’s. In: Coin Desk. https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2020/09/18/vechain-to-supply-blockchain-tech-for-chinese-food-safety-group-that-includes-mcdonalds/

Skilton P, Robinson J (2009) Traceability and normal accident theory: How does supply network complexity influence the traceability of adverse events? J Supply Chain Manag 45(3):40–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03170.x

Smith O (2018) Ben & Jerry's Bets On Blockchain To Cancel Out The Carbon In Every Scoop. In: Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/oliversmith/2018/05/29/ben-jerrys-bets-on-blockchain-to-cancel-out-the-carbon-in-every-scoop/?sh=471379cb688c

Sodhi MMS, Tang CS (2019) Research opportunities in supply chain transparency. Prod Oper Manag 28:2946–2959. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13115

Staff R (2016) China uncovers 500,000 food safety violations in nine months. Reuter

Staff M (2018) Strong US economy fueling supply chain opportunities: State of logistics report. Mater Handl Logist

Statista (2020) Size of the blockchain technology market worldwide from 2018 to 2025. https://www.statista.com/statistics/647231/worldwide-blockchain-technology-market-size/

Tandon A, Dhir A, Islam N, Mantymaki M (2020) Blockchain in healthcare: a systematic literature review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda. Comput Ind 122:103290

Tandon A, Kaur P, Mäntymäki M, Dhir A (2021) Blockchain applications in management: A bibliometric analysis and literature review. Technol Forecast Soc Change 166:120649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120649

Tayeb Z (2021) More companies, including PayPal and Xbox, are accepting bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as payment. Others are weighing up their options. Bus Insid

Tönnissen S, Teuteberg F (2020) Analysing the impact of blockchain-technology for operations and supply chain management: An explanatory model drawn from multiple case studies. Int J Inf Manage 52:101953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.009

van Hoek R (2019) Exploring blockchain implementation in the supply chain: Learning from pioneers and RFID research. Int J Oper Prod Manag 39:829–859. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-01-2019-0022

van Hoek R (2020) Developing a framework for considering blockchain pilots in the supply chain – lessons from early industry adopters. Supply Chain Manag 25:115–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-05-2019-0206

Verhoeven P, Sinn F, Herden T (2018) Examples from blockchain implementations in logistics and supply chain management: Exploring the mindful use of a new technology. Logistics 2(3):20. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics2030020

Weldon R, Herridge M, Cohen J (2017) Retail: Opening the doors to blockchain. Cognizant

Wong L, Leong L, Hew J et al (2020) Time to seize the digital evolution: Adoption of blockchain in operations and supply chain management among Malaysian SMEs. Int J Inf Manage 52:101997.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.005

Yin RK (1994) Case study Research. Design and Methods (2nd edition), Second Edi. Sage publication

Yli-Huumo J, Ko D, Choi S et al (2016) Where is current research on blockchain technology? A systematic review. PLoS One 11:e0163477. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163477

Zhou X, Zhu Q, Xu Z (2022) The mediating role of supply chain quality management for traceability and performance improvement: Evidence among Chinese food firms. Int J Prod Econ 254:108630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108630

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Eada Business School Barcelona, Carrer d´Aragó 204, 08011, Barcelona, Spain

Rita Maria Difrancesco

Department of Supply Chain and Information Management, School of Business, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC, 29424, USA

Purushottam Meena

Operations Management, Indian Institute of Management Raipur, Raipur, 493 661, India

Gopal Kumar

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rita Maria Difrancesco .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Difrancesco, R.M., Meena, P. & Kumar, G. How blockchain technology improves sustainable supply chain processes: a practical guide. Oper Manag Res 16 , 620–641 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-022-00343-y

Download citation

Received : 06 July 2022

Revised : 30 November 2022

Accepted : 12 December 2022

Published : 29 December 2022

Issue Date : June 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-022-00343-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Blockchain technology
• Supply chain management
• Gartner Supply Chain Top-25
• Case studies
• Theoretical framework
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

• Lifestyles & Social Issues
• Philosophy & Religion
• Politics, Law & Government
• World History
• Health & Medicine
• Browse Biographies
• Birds, Reptiles & Other Vertebrates
• Bugs, Mollusks & Other Invertebrates
• Environment
• Fossils & Geologic Time
• Geography & Travel
• Entertainment & Pop Culture
• Sports & Recreation
• Visual Arts

Recently Posted

Household finance.

Biographies

Finance & the Economy

New Articles

Language Selector

Asia, oceania & pacific, caribbean, central & south america.

• Português do Brasil

INDIAN SUB-CONTINENT, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA

United states, the latest news from ups, ups releases 1q 2024 earnings.

UPS announced first-quarter 2024 consolidated revenues of $21.7 billion, a 5.3% decrease from the first quarter of 2023.

• Media Relations

For Reporters and Media Outlets

Journalists on deadlines can easily reach the Media Relations team by phone or email around the globe and around the clock. For urgent press needs, call 1-404-828-7123 for directions to reach us after-hours.

Need a UPS logo? Click here to register for access to the UPS Brand Central asset library.

• 1-404-828-7123
• Follow   @UPS_News  for the latest company news

For Customers

For service inquires or general questions about UPS, please visit our Help and Support Center .