corporate social responsibility communication case study

Reviewing corporate social responsibility communication: a legitimacy perspective

Corporate Communications: An International Journal

ISSN : 1356-3289

Article publication date: 7 September 2018

Issue publication date: 9 October 2018

The purpose of this paper is to answer the call for CSR communication research to develop and substantiate outcomes that may better explain CSR communication strategies and practices. The paper takes the research a step further, exploring the role of legitimacy in CSR communication research.

Design/methodology/approach

A literature collection methodology, combined with directed content analysis, was used to identify central themes in the literature.

The following categories of studies were identified: perception, impact and promotion studies; image and reputation studies; performance studies; and conceptual/rhetorical studies. Addressed from a legitimacy perspective, the study found that the most important types of legitimizing communicative practices articulated in the four types of studies were related to: seeking knowledge about stakeholders through perception, impact and promotion activities; monitoring and controlling the environment through image and reputation activities; creating stakeholder value through collaboration and engagement; and persuading and convincing stakeholders through rhetorics, CSR models and concepts. The study also found that practices and activities related to perceiving stakeholders’ expectations, needs and requirements are assumed to be most effective for corporations aiming at building or maintaining legitimacy.

Originality/value

The key contribution of the paper lies in exploring how corporate legitimacy is anticipated and extrapolated in the CSR communication literature, including which pinpointed CSR communication strategies and practices are assumed to be more effective than others in bridging stakeholders’ perceptions of corporations’ social and environmental actions. Until date, no reviews exist of the role of legitimacy in CSR communication research.

• Corporate social responsibility
• Corporate communications
• Content analysis

Ellerup Nielsen, A. and Thomsen, C. (2018), "Reviewing corporate social responsibility communication: a legitimacy perspective", Corporate Communications: An International Journal , Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 492-511. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-04-2018-0042

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018, Anne Ellerup Nielsen and Christa Thomsen

Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial & non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode

Introduction

Many corporations are concerned with gaining legitimacy through integrating the expectations of their stakeholders into the overall company strategy. For decades, for example, the Danish pharmaceutical corporation Novo Nordisk has engaged systematically with multiple stakeholders in order to address key areas of their business. The company recognizes that “it is essential to establish a positive interaction not merely between management and investors, but also in relation to other stakeholders” ( Novo Nordisk, 2015 ). Another example is Shell. Shell focuses, for example, “on the environmental and social challenges that matter most to our key stakeholders. A thorough process was used to identify the sustainability topics for our reporting based on information from internal and external sources” ( Shell, 2015 ).

The growing expectations of stakeholders are connected to the process of globalization. In this context, social and environmental disasters due to a lack of corporate self-regulation have challenged corporate legitimacy ( Palazzo and Scherer, 2006 ; Scherer and Palazzo, 2007 ). As a result of this, stakeholders are increasingly requiring that corporations justify their social and environmental actions. Corporate legitimacy has been defined as “a generalized perception or assumption that the actions of an entity are desirable, proper, or appropriate within some socially constructed system of norms, values, beliefs, and definitions” ( Suchman, 1995 , p. 574). Thus, obtaining legitimacy by aligning corporate behavior with stakeholder expectations is necessary to guarantee the corporation’s continued existence ( Dawkins, 2004 ). This has created an increased emphasis on effective stakeholder communication and issues that can be grouped under the headline of CSR. CSR has been defined as “a practice which corporations undertake to integrate social, environmental, ethical, human rights and consumer concerns into their business operations and core strategy in close collaboration with their stakeholders” ( European Commission, 2011 , p. 681). In line with this, CSR communication is defined in this study as a communicative practice, which corporations undertake to integrate social, environmental, ethical, human rights and consumer concerns into their business operations and core strategy in close collaboration with their stakeholders. Judging by the number of case studies in academic literature, at conferences, seminars, etc., there is an increasing interest in the communicative practice of CSR. Yet, despite the recognition of the importance of legitimacy in CSR communication, this topic has only recently been investigated (e.g. Du et al. , 2010 ; Du and Vieira, 2012 ; Golob et al. , 2013 ; Ihlen et al. , 2011 ; Morsing et al., 2008 ; Palazzo and Scherer, 2006 ; Scherer and Palazzo, 2007, 2011 ; Schultz, Castelló and Morsing, 2013 ; Schultz, Morsing and Castello, 2013 ). However, in most cases, the focus has been on isolated factors, e.g. message content, communication approach, process and channel, that influence outcomes broadly defined as reputation, legitimacy and effectiveness. It is not until recently that reviews of CSR communication literature have emerged that address on a more general-level CSR communication streams, themes, challenges and opportunities or outcomes ( Crane and Glozer, 2016 ; Elving et al. , 2015 ; Nielsen and Thomsen, 2012 ).

How can corporate social responsibility communication create legitimacy?

In order to answer this research question, the international research was reviewed, the argument being that the way CSR scholars conceptualize CSR communication demonstrates how CSR communication may lead to gaining and/or losing legitimacy. The key contribution of the paper lies in exploring how corporate legitimacy is anticipated and extrapolated in CSR communication literature, including which pinpointed CSR communication strategies and practices are assumed to be more effective than others in bridging stakeholders’ perceptions of corporations’ social and environmental actions and the corporate CSR agenda.

Theoretical framework: CSR, corporate communication and legitimacy

CSR is increasingly seen as an integrated part of corporate communication (e.g. Cornelissen, 2011/2014 ; Pollach et al. , 2012 ; Van Riel, 1995 ). The uniqueness of CSR communication research can be highlighted by considering how it pursues the four prevailing justifications for CSR in strategic management research: moral obligation, sustainability, license to operate and reputation ( Porter and Kramer, 2006 , p. 81; see also Secchi, 2007 ; Wood, 2010 ). In a strict moral perspective, CSR communication research needs to focus on communication initiatives whereby corporations “achieve commercial success in ways that honor ethical values and respect people, communities, and the natural environment” ( Porter and Kramer, 2006 , p. 81). In a sustainability perspective, CSR communication research needs to focus on communication initiatives supporting corporations in their efforts to meet “the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” ( Porter and Kramer, 2006 , p. 81). The underlying assumption behind the notion of “license to operate” is that every company needs tacit or explicit permission (legitimacy) from governments, communities and numerous other stakeholders to do business. Thus, CSR communication research needs to focus on communication initiatives related to obtaining and maintaining this permission. Finally, in a reputation perspective, CSR communication research needs to focus on communication initiatives that will “improve a company’s image, strengthen its brand, enliven morale, and even raise the value of its stock” ( Porter and Kramer, 2006 , p. 82).

Corporate legitimacy

Legitimacy is considered vital for the survival of organizations and a prerequisite for the flow of resources and stakeholder support ( Palazzo and Scherer, 2006 , p. 71). Accordingly, legitimacy is seen as “a process whereby organizations seek approval for their acts from groups in society” ( Kaplan and Ruland, 1991 , p. 320). Following Suchman (1995) , legitimacy is a socially constructed concept based on how organizations’ actions are perceived or assumed within a “socially constructed system of norms, values, beliefs, and definitions” ( Suchman, 1995 , p. 574). Suchman’s definition of legitimacy as pragmatic, moral and cognitive is widely used as a point of reference for scholars dealing with legitimacy and institutionalization processes. Pragmatic legitimacy is connected to instrumental CSR and framed as the exchange between an organization and its stakeholders according to self-interested benefits. Moral legitimacy is value based, and approaches CSR through the context of ethics. It is based on judgments about whether the organization’s activities result in societal benefits that adhere to the socially constructed value system of the stakeholders. Finally, cognitive legitimacy is what organizations may acquire by conforming to what is regarded as mainstream in business life and taken for granted by the public ( Palazzo and Scherer, 2006 ; Suchman, 1995 ). With the general expansion of CSR, CSR legitimacy strategies and practices are increasingly routinized and institutionalized, whereby the stage of cognitive legitimacy is gradually reached ( Suchman, 1995 , p. 585). In recent years, however, moral legitimacy has achieved a more intense position with the general move toward corporate self-regulation. As a result, the pressure on global interaction and networking between political actors and corporate leaders to discuss and deliberate CSR challenges, standards, goals and processes is growing, setting higher expectations of corporate moral legitimacy act and consequently on the role played by CSR communication ( Palazzo and Scherer, 2006 ; Castello and Lozano, 2011 ; Scherer and Palazzo, 2007, 2011 ; Seele and Lock, 2015 ; Wagner and Seele, 2017 ).

Strategies aimed at gaining legitimacy are multiple. They may range from conforming to demands, ideals or models to selecting markets, domains, labels or advertising to persuading or institutionalizing. Strategies for maintaining or repairing legitimacy may take a more protectionist, monitoring, denying, excusing or explaining shape across the three basic types of legitimacy ( Suchman, 1995 , p. 600). Communication plays a crucial role in the conceptualization and practice of these strategies in which both corporate dissemination and deliberation serve the process of building corporate legitimacy.

The pursuit of legitimacy via CSR communication is primarily anchored in the “self-promoter paradox” establishing a clash between corporate promises and public expectations of whether these promises are lofty or actually met ( Ashforth and Gibbs, 1990 , p. 186). Communication researchers have framed this paradox as “the CSR Promotional Dilemma” ( Coombs and Holladay, 2012 ). The dilemma is embedded in much CSR communication and often takes the form of conscientious, codified strategy practice. Navigating the balance between framing CSR activities as, on the one hand, an ethical urge to do “good” and, on the other hand, a best practice of organizational self-interest has thus proved to be a double-edged sword for many businesses ( Carroll and Shabana, 2010 ).

Communicatively, the paradox above has a considerable impact on the understanding of CSR as a means to gain corporate legitimacy. On the one hand CSR communication is addressed as a “documentation” discipline, on the other hand as a “rhetorical device.” While documenting via CSR communication responds to the growing demand for transparency and accountability in corporations’ CSR activities, the negative understanding of CSR as a rhetorical device refers to the condescension expressed toward CSR communication by critical voices who view CSR as nothing but “window dressing,” “green/blue/pink washing,” “a PR invention,” etc. (e.g. Frankental, 2001 ; Dubbink et al. , 2008 ; Amazeen, 2011 ). In the political sense of CSR as self-regulation, CSR communication is framed as a deliberative rather than a rhetorical device based on how to give “credit to the interests and arguments of a wide range of constituencies that are affected by the activities of (multinational) corporations” ( Scherer and Palazzo, 2011 , p. 916). From a legitimacy perspective, the tension between the embedded understandings and framings above articulates how organizations seek approval for their acts in different ways from multiple stakeholder groups, which will be demonstrated below.

With the above concepts and theories in mind, and in order to examine the potential for CSR communication to create corporate legitimacy, it is argued that a range of determinants of CSR communication anchored in the strategic positioning of the organization contribute to position the company vis-à-vis its competitors in the marketplace. Furthermore, it is assumed that the effect of the considered determinants on corporate legitimacy are monitored by three moderators ( Suchman, 1995 ): (1) conforming to stakeholder demands, ideals or models; (2) selecting markets, domains, labels or advertising; and (3) persuading (e.g. informing, explaining, monitoring, denying and excusing). In the analysis below, this argument is substantiated.

To gain a comprehensive view of how CSR communication is conceptualized in the literature, a systematic review was conducted ( Peloza and Shang, 2011 ). Systematic reviews “summarize in an explicit way what is known and not known about a specific practice-related question” ( Briner et al. , 2009 , p. 19). Search words were selected within the fields and disciplines considered particularly relevant in a CSR communication perspective: marketing communication, public relations and stakeholder communication as a broader category. These approaches basically reflect key targets of the communication: consumers and customers (CSR marketing communication); publics (CSR public relations); and stakeholders in general including employees and NGOs (CSR corporate communication).

Two-step search process: “CSR” combined with “communication”; “CSR communication”; “CSR” combined with: “marketing communication,” “advertising,” “management communication,”public relations,” “corporate communication,” “organizational communication” and “dialogue”; and “CSR communication” combined with “stakeholder” and “legitimacy.”

International peer-reviewed articles in academic journals (full text, references available, English language and more than four pages).

Date of publication in the period 2000–2017.

The search was undertaken using the citation search facility of the ABI/INFORM, EBSCO’s Business Source Complete, Communication and Mass Media Complete (CMMC) and JSTOR, and through reference list searching. The databases selected cover social sciences, broadly defined, including communication, the Business Source Complete and the CMMC databases being regarded as the dominant databases within business/economics and communication research, respectively.

A total of 207 references were generated in the first broad search for “CSR” combined with “communication,” whereas the search for “CSR communication” resulted in fewer references, all of which also came up in the first broad search for “CSR” combined with “communication.” Interestingly, 53 out of the 207 references were from 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017, demonstrating that CSR communication is a growing field. Our narrow search for “CSR” combined with “marketing communication,” “advertising,” “management communication,” “public relations,” “corporate communication,” “organizational communication” and “dialogue,” as well as “CSR communication” combined with “stakeholder,” confirmed our first broad search, and only a few additional articles were added to our list. There was extensive overlap between articles from the two databases used, BSC and CMMC. However, a number of articles on CSR public relations and CSR corporate communication were found in CMMC which had not come up in our BSC search, and which were consequently added.

Out of the total number of references, 151 were selected for review with the help of content analysis framed within CSR and corporate communication, the selection criteria being: exclusion of references classified as proceedings, use of the word “CSR” in keywords, title and abstract, and framing within CSR and communication.

Directed content analysis was used to interpret meaning from the content of our text data ( Hsieh and Shannon, 2005 ). Each of the selected 151 articles was analyzed for CSR communication content based on the definition of CSR (communication) and occurrences of key concepts and notions such as, e.g., “attitude,” “belief,” “perception,” “impact,” “sense-making,” “promotion,” “message,” “skepticism,” etc., supporting particular communicative perspectives and understandings of CSR communication.

In the following, the most important types of framings and themes registered for how scholars anticipate CSR communication as a means to create, maintain and enhance corporate legitimacy are presented.

Perception, impact and promotion studies

The first group of studies investigates how especially consumers evaluate specific CSR efforts and how they affect their relationship with brands (perception) with regard to their attitude toward or likeliness to purchase brands (impact). These studies thus first and foremost buy into the idea of CSR as a promotional tool (promotion), reflecting a particular urge to investigate consumers’ but also other stakeholders’ attitudes toward CSR communication. Consumers’ reactions, in particular, to CSR initiatives in terms of awareness, attitude, behavior and expectations, etc., have been subject to several studies (e.g. Golob et al. , 2008 ; Pérez and Rodríguez del Bosque, 2013 ; Pomering and Dolnicar, 2009 ; Stanalan et al. , 2011 ). Some studies focused on the relationship between consumer perception of CSR communication and purchase intention ( Dutta and Singh, 2013 ; Sora, 2011 ; Wang and Anderson, 2011 ) and others addressed issues such as the corporate perception of stakeholder pressure ( Vazquez-Brust et al. , 2010 ) or financial analysts’ perception of CSR strategies ( Fieseler, 2011 ).

In a similar vein, a group of studies addressed the impact of CSR communication on brands/reputation/CSR perception. They may be categorized as effect and impact studies providing insight into the extent to which CSR communication does, or is likely to, affect brand equity, reputation and consumer skepticism (e.g. Becker-Olsen et al. , 2011 ; Bilowol and Doan, 2015 ; Elving, 2013 ; Jahdi and Acikdilli, 2009 ; Parquel et al. , 2011 ).

Both perception and impact studies were particularly important in marketing-oriented studies of CSR communication. A general characteristic of this research is its focus on the development and use of methods and mechanisms that may explain and measure the effect of corporations’ CSR initiatives and communication on stakeholders’ brand perception and identification as well as brand reputation. One example is a study demonstrating that consumer perception is enhanced when a brand is viewed as global ( Becker-Olsen et al. , 2011 ). Another perception-related study demonstrates that the level of awareness of businesses’ CSR operations among consumers in the banking sector is low and, accordingly, that businesses should adopt more active communication strategies, target their CSR messages more effectively and educate consumers to contextualize CSR communication in order to gain benefits from their CSR initiatives ( Pomering and Dolnicar, 2009 ). Other more recent studies seem to replicate a similar format correlating consumers’ perception of CSR activities in particular contexts and industries with, e.g. sponsor-sincerity ( Scheinbaum et al. , 2017 ), or CSR pricing with perceived CSR sacrifice by consumers ( Sungsook, 2015 ). A study that stands out from this format adopted a more critical analytical approach to examining and discussing the effect of CSR communication on consumers and vice versa, arguing that a backlash against brands seems to be provoked by consumer criticism of CSR marketing and unsolved problems in the supply chains of large corporations, e.g. working conditions in sweatshops and downstream marketing ( Smith et al. , 2010 ). This type of study pioneers a recent emergence of critical research that challenges the use of CSR as a marketing and branding instrument without taking further notice of consumer activism, stakeholder involvement and the global context in which companies operate. Overlooking these elements is partly the result of the strong anchoring of instrumental CSR in the classical marketing paradigm (see also Crane and Glozer, 2016 ).

This taps perfectly into a third group of studies considering the potential of promoting and branding the corporation through CSR. These studies address how specific CSR communication tactics and techniques can help to build brand citizenship and brand equity (e.g. Banytė and Gadeikienė, 2008 ; Demetriou and Aristotelous, 2011 ; Maggio-Muller and Evans, 2008 ). Very few of these seem to address CSR communication as a strategic issue, i.e. setting out to establish a conceptual framework for how CSR can be integrated more strategically into the marketing discipline (e.g. Maignan and Ferrell, 2004 ).

Perception, impact and promotion studies are primarily anchored in a classical conceptualization of communication, in which instrumental measures such as “documenting” in the form of “more information about CSR” and/or “rhetorical devices” in the form of “alternative messaging and contents” are expected to result in changed stakeholder perception of the corporate image and/or CSR stance of a company. None – or very few – of the studies seem to challenge the classical behavioral pattern. Consequently, CSR communication is mostly addressed as one-way communication, i.e. as an instrumental add-on tool rather than two-way communication or invitation to community building, networking and co-creating CSR with stakeholders ( Nielsen and Thomsen, 2012 , p. 60), a conclusion also drawn by Crane and Glozer (2016 , p. 24).

Image and reputation studies, a fourth important group of studies, articulated the role of CSR communication as a means to enhance corporations’ image/reputation/relationship management potential. These studies typically emerge from public relations and corporate communication in which CSR communication is conceptualized to build, maintain and/or restore a company’s image and reputation ( Benn et al. , 2010 ; Demetriou et al. , 2010 ; György and Oravecz, 2009 ; Kim and Park, 2011 ; Komodromos and Melanthiou, 2014 ; Middlemiss, 2003 ; Núñez Ladevéze et al. , 2015 ; Steurer, 2010 ; Yong et al. , 2012 ).

Not surprisingly, these studies were particularly dominating in public relations-oriented studies. As argued by Clark, CSR and public relations have very similar objectives in that they are both basically seeking to enhance the quality of the relationship of organizations with their key stakeholders ( Clark, 2000 , p. 376). CSR communication, therefore, overlaps with public relations, i.e. in terms of playing a key role in addressing stakeholders, focusing on communicative affordances, either externally, e.g. corporate mission slogans ( Verboven, 2011 ), media coverage of CSR ( Middlemiss, 2003 ), public policy operations ( Steurer, 2010 ), or internally, e.g. through employee commitment ( György and Oravecz, 2009 ) organizational leadership ( Benn et al. , 2010 ).

A fifth group of studies was approached from the similar yet opposite perspective of anticipating conflicts/avoiding bad publicity through CSR communication. The scope of this group of studies is to use CSR communication as a driver for creating trust and credibility by preempting or anticipating negative perception and conflicts, hence accomplishing the role of “issues management” ( Cho and Kim, 2012 ; Hughes and Demetrious, 2006 ; Nwagbara and Brown, 2014 ; Waller and Conaway, 2011 ). Accordingly, most of the studies came up in searches with “public relations.” Specific CSR communication techniques and strategies are thus typically suggested to avoid negative CSR perception ( Waller and Conaway, 2011 ), incongruence between perceived and desired image ( Tata and Prasad, 2015 ), negative legitimacy ( Vanhamme and Grobben, 2009 ; Arvidsson, 2010 ), PR spin ( Hughes and Demetrious, 2006 ) or as a general buffer for negative issues ( Cho and Kim, 2012 ).

These findings allowed us to conclude so far that major issues addressed in the image and reputation studies above focus on how to protect a company’s corporate image, reputation and legitimacy against negative publicity and activism (see e.g. Lawton et al., 2013 ). With the rise of social media as the paramount channel for engaging consumers, partners, journalists, NGOs, etc., in CSR processes, the pressure on organizations to disclose their CSR performances is stronger than ever. As a consequence, they are also more fragile and exposed to public criticism and attack ( Coombs and Holladay, 2012 ). The protective role that public relations (and issues management in particular) traditionally assume through scanning and monitoring the corporate environment of organizations thus seems to call for a reactivation with the growing pressure on corporations to gain corporate legitimacy from stakeholders through their CSR efforts and communication hereof.

Performance studies

A sixth group of studies was framed from the perspective of how companies do or can capitalize on CSR communication. They first and foremost appeared in corporate communication-oriented studies demonstrating that the use of particular strategic or tactical CSR operations has led or may lead to better CSR outcomes for the corporation and/or its stakeholders. CSR outcomes imply assets such as corporate reputation ( Ferns et al. , 2008 ; Ingenhoff and Koelling, 2012 ; Morsing et al. , 2008 ), corporate identity and identification ( Bravo et al. , 2012 ; Chong, 2009 ; Morsing, 2006 ), competitive advantage ( Vilanova et al. , 2009 ), higher credibility ( Gruber et al. , 2017 ), stakeholder benefits ( Bhattacharya et al. , 2009 ; Du et al. , 2010 ) and corporate legitimacy ( Du and Vieira, 2012 ).

A large group of these performance studies pitched into how to implement or promote stakeholder dialogue as a means of establishing stakeholder relationships in CSR processes of engagement, collaboration and participation. Stakeholder dialogue is typically introduced as a necessity for creating a foundation for public policy ( Hristache et al. , 2013 ), being successful in large-scale CSR ( Konrad et al. , 2008 ), CSR decision making and change ( Muijen, 2004 ; O’Riordan and Fairbrass, 2008 ; Uysal, 2014 ), organizational learning ( Burchell and Cook, 2008 ; Golob et al. , 2014 ), translating CSR into practice ( Pedersen, 2006 ), managing relationships with NGOs ( Burchell and Cook, 2006 ; Valor and Merino de Diego, 2009 ) and for social reporting ( Jackson and Bundgard, 2002 ; Reynolds and Yuthas, 2008 ). A related group of studies focused on the perspective of stakeholder dialogue, addressed from a social media perspective, and their ability to advance and nurture stakeholder engagement, participation and empowerment ( Fieseler et al. , 2010 ; Fieseler and Fleck, 2013 ; Golob and Podnar, 2014 ; Illia et al. , 2017 ; Nwagbara, 2013 ; Nwagbara and Reid, 2013 ), e.g. between employers and employees ( Cortini, 2009 ; Stohl et al. , 2017 ).

The performance-oriented studies above primarily concentrate on the alignment of CSR communication to legitimacy variables such as reputation building, credibility, a competitive advantage, long lasting stakeholder relationships, employee and other stakeholder engagements, etc. (see, e.g., reviews by Chun, 2005 ; Heras-Saizarbitoria and Boiral, 2013 ; Miller et al. , 2014 ). This research thus provides insight into important general corporate communication legitimacy drivers such as the importance of having a “CSR history,” the need to involve stakeholders, the importance of championship by senior management and of implementing credible CSR programs and communication platforms to document CSR activities (such as e.g. CSR reporting and auditing). In general, the importance of stakeholder dialogue is stressed. The fact that a company’s consciousness of communication strategies and communicative purpose, ability, willingness and interests may affect the legitimacy attributed by stakeholders to CSR initiatives. In this connection, Andriof and Waddock (2002) argued that managers play an important role in the relationships that companies have with internal and external stakeholders (p. 19). In order to gain legitimacy, managers must embody CSR values and promote and support them through their own behavior and attitude. Consequently, leadership is required at more than one level in an organization, which suggests not only top executives but also middle managers and others must fully endorse the CSR values of the organization as a prerequisite for achieving and maintaining legitimacy (see also Du et al. , 2013 ; Nielsen and Thomsen, 2009 ).

CSR communication conceptual and rhetorical studies

A final group of studies was framed within more conceptual and rhetorical issues such as understanding CSR models and concepts ( Podnar, 2008 ; Fassin and Van Rossem, 2009 ; Schultz, Castelló and Morsing, 2013 ; Schultz, Morsing and Castello, 2013 ) or particular tactics, linguistic, textual or media and discourse framings of CSR. Their focus seems to be more on communication as a generic concept and its impact on communicating about CSR. Particular focus is on contexts, e.g. the marketplace, emergent economy countries, etc. ( Bendell, 2010 ; Dobers and Delyse, 2010 ; Garre-Rubio et al. , 2012 ; Lielgaidina et al. , 2012 ; Rajandran and Taib, 2014 ; Roostalu and Kooskora 2010 ; Ziek, 2009 ) or on discussing their particularities, e.g. dialogism and power relations ( Brennan et al. , 2013 ) especially media, e.g. releases ( Reinig and Tilt, 2009 ), newsletters ( Walker et al. , 2010 ) or their successfulness in terms of readability ( Abu Bakar and Ameer, 2011 ). See also Skard and Thorbjørnsen (2014) regarding the source effect of CSR communication on brand reputation and Fraustino and Connolly-Ahern (2015) regarding message strategies in corporate online network communication.

Summing-up, our analysis shows that communicative practices anticipated by scholars for how CSR communication creates, maintains and enhances corporate legitimacy are based on multiple drivers – from perception over image and reputation to performance. However, they all share the focus on stakeholders and CSR activities, effects and outcomes aimed at obtaining their approval.

In the section below, a closer look is taken at how the anticipated and extrapolated legitimacy framings are distributed with regard to established strategies of legitimation.

Legitimacy forms and strategies in the CSR communication literature

The literature reviewed above centers around the role of CSR communication as a process whereby organizations seek approval for their acts from multiple stakeholder groups. From a legitimacy perspective, the pinpointed groups of studies constitute different instances in which CSR communication actions and strategies are expected to generate much/little corporate legitimacy by CSR scholars.

The perception, impact and promotion perspective of our findings is based on the assumption that corporate legitimacy is achieved through promoting and conforming to stakeholders’ demands, requiring that businesses have detailed knowledge of these demands. Two legitimation strategies seem to be in play from this perspective. Pragmatic legitimacy is anticipated in the embedded eagerness to measure and optimize CSR strategies in alignment with selected stakeholders’ interests and expectations, whereas cognitive legitimacy is anchored in the impetus to conform to perception models and methods belonging to classical instrumental conceptualizations of communication.

From an image and reputation perspective, corporate legitimacy is mainly linked to the extent to which companies are able to build and maintain relationships with stakeholders. More specifically, it is assumed that scanning and monitoring the environment, i.e. scrutinizing and keeping track of public reactions toward companies’ and competitors’ CSR practices, is a first prerequisite for achieving corporate legitimacy. This perspective on CSR communication preempts pragmatic legitimacy. With companies’ strong interest in monitoring, controlling and managing issues, this perspective on CSR communication is first and foremost a pragmatic legitimacy concern. The impetus of exercising corporate control over CSR communication processes and outcomes is suggested as a way for companies to critically assess their own and their competitors’ CSR performances, as well as to anticipate and handle potential dilemmas and conflicts emerging in their environment.

From a performance perspective, corporate legitimacy is expected to occur as a result of a company’s ability to establish and maintain good relations with stakeholders through various stakeholder engagement practices. Engagement, participation, collaboration and empowerment are thus framed as drivers of legitimacy. Primary legitimation strategies from this perspective may be characterized as pragmatic and moral. Appealing to stakeholder engagement and involvement is instrumental for gaining social capital, and it also paves the way for collaborating and networking with stakeholders on collective ideals, values and agendas. In other words, the behavior, attitude and communicative role of managers, employees and non-corporate members are framed as crucial for gaining corporate legitimacy. Following this rationale, inviting employees and other stakeholders to interact and enter into dialogue about CSR agendas, initiatives, policies and programs is a means of opening for two-way communication. This two-way communication enjoys higher credibility and is considered to be more stimulating for stakeholder engagement than one-way communication. Accordingly, and not surprisingly, the interest in social media, with its interactive and co-creative character is suggested and anticipated as an appropriate persuasion strategy.

A conceptual and rhetorical perspective on corporate legitimacy is articulated through the use of appropriate discourses and narratives. As these are of a more general concern, this perspective is not restricted to a particular legitimation strategy. Not only is the use of precise CSR concepts and definitions key to reaching mutual understanding about CSR activities, programs and policies among stakeholders, but authenticity in messaging and stakeholder interactions concerning CSR efforts, promises and developments are also crucial for gaining and maintaining legitimacy, i.e. creating and disclosing an authentic organizational self by giving voice to employees and other stakeholders in strategy making processes through active participation ( Liedtka, 2008 ; McShane and Cunningham, 2012 ). Following this argument, the crafting of messages, choosing the right media, channel and tone of voice, using valid arguments and contracting engagements in concordance with selected stakeholder target groups and communicative purposes are also important determinants for how much, or how little, legitimacy companies achieve with their CSR communication.

On the surface it appears that instances of anticipation of legitimacy through the above communication practices reflect a strong – or even dominating – emphasis on pragmatic legitimacy, while elements of cognitive and moral legitimacy are limited. Pragmatic legitimacy lies, first and foremost, in the outcome-oriented, company-centric approach to using CSR communication for gaining, restoring or repairing legitimacy, while moral legitimacy is more aimed at achieving legitimacy as a result of ethical concern and reflection about the societal impact of CSR, hence the growing research interest in collaborative CSR and the role of CSR as deliberation and argumentation ( Scherer and Palazzo, 2011 ). Cognitive legitimacy is anticipated as a result of institutionalized practices regarding CSR standards, norms and beliefs.

Based on the above, the analytical framework is presented highlighting major CSR communication practices and means that are assumed to generate or enhance corporate legitimacy ( Figure 1 ).

Three legitimation moderators (1), (2) and (3) translate into different CSR communication practices and strategies. Legitimation is, for example, gained by measuring and optimizing CSR communication strategies in alignment with expectations (legitimation moderator 1). Legitimation is also gained by adopting and selecting specific agendas, methods and strategies (legitimation moderator 2). Finally, legitimation is gained by building and maintaining relationships (legitimation moderator 3). The different practices and strategies relate to either pragmatic, moral or cognitive legitimacy.

Discussion and conclusion

Below our findings are discussed in terms of main findings, limitations and implications.

Main findings

Arguing that the way scholars conceptualize CSR communication affects their thinking on whether CSR communication may lead to gaining and/or losing legitimacy, this study examined how corporate legitimacy is anticipated and extrapolated in CSR communication literature. The study highlighted which CSR communication practices are assumed to be most effective when bridging stakeholders’ perceptions of corporations’ social and environmental actions and the corporate CSR agenda.

seeking knowledge about stakeholders through perception, impact and promotion activities;

monitoring and controlling the environment through image and reputation activities;

creating stakeholder value, collaboration and engagement; and

persuading stakeholders through rhetorics, organizational authenticity, concepts and CSR models.

It was also found that practices and activities related to perceiving stakeholders’ expectations, needs and requirements are assumed to be most appropriate for corporations aiming at building or maintaining legitimacy.

Our findings confirmed previous research articulating legitimacy as “a process whereby organizations seek approval for their acts from groups in society” ( Kaplan and Ruland, 1991 , p. 320). They add to the literature by identifying communicative practices and activities which are more effective than others in bridging stakeholders’ perceptions of corporations’ social and environmental actions (e.g. Du et al., 2010 ; Du and Vieira, 2012 ; Elving et al. , 2015 ; Golob et al. , 2013 ; Ihlen et al. , 2011 ). Overall, it was found that corporate legitimacy seems to be more easily acquired when employees and other stakeholders are co-creators or endorsers of CSR communication than if it originates from corporate management alone ( Morsing et al. , 2008 ). In other words, two-way CSR communication with employees may affect a company’s legitimacy positively, while one-way communication alone may challenge legitimacy. In a similar vein, it was found that CSR messages and communication strategies may influence corporations’ acquisition of corporate legitimacy. Unless one-way CSR communication introduces and explains issues that are well supported and justified by factual information and organizational authenticity, there is a potential risk of misinterpretation by critical stakeholders who may decode CSR messages as “green,” “blue” or “pink washing,” rather than as expressions of substantiated, well-intentioned CSR acts.

Not surprisingly, it was also found that CSR communication is instrumentally rather than ethically, driven – in that the most prominent role attributed by scholars to CSR communication is its assumed capacity to increase businesses’ market opportunities. Only in a very few and recent studies, such as, e.g., those addressing the expanding political role of CSR, CSR communication is framed as a platform for establishing collaborative deliberative networks and mutual understanding with stakeholders. This articulation of CSR communication is not entirely unexpected. It can be traced back to discourses and agendas initiated a decade ago by national governments and the international society, in which CSR is advanced as a win-win strategy that enables alignment of corporate and societal outcomes ( Porter and Kramer, 2006 ; Prahalad and Hart, 2002 ). Following these agendas, scholars within strategic CSR management go as far as to suggest that CSR is a means of transforming social challenges into business opportunities by establishing processes of creating shared value ( Porter and Kramer, 2011 ). Other more critical scholars contend that it is an illusion to assume that social and economic outcomes and benefits can go hand in hand, arguing that there is no evidence that CSR actually makes businesses more profitable ( Crane et al. , 2014 ; Fleming and Jones, 2013 ). This CSR dilemma is transposed into CSR communication research, explaining why most CSR communication literature is primarily based on traditional one-way transmission rather than a two-way dialogical perspective.

Importantly, it was found that the pursuit of pragmatic legitimacy seems to predominate in CSR communication. Originating in an instrumental management approach, the concern for gaining, restoring or repairing pragmatic legitimacy through CSR communication is part of our observations above. Addressing CSR instrumentally, i.e. as a business case, is first and foremost outcome driven. Whether the outcome achieved is addressed as increased profits or legitimacy does not change the strategic intent of the legitimacy act. Pragmatic legitimacy is regarded as a prerequisite for corporate self-benefit and, thus, profit maximization. The crucial point is the conscious intentionality driving the act of seeking pragmatic legitimacy vs the unconscious intentionality embedded in cognitive legitimacy, or the pure and simple lack of corporate intentionality embedded in moral legitimacy driven by more ethical management or political and collaborative approaches to CSR ( Garriga and Melé, 2004 ; Palazzo and Scherer, 2006 ; Scherer and Palazzo, 2007, 2011 ; Suchman, 1995 ).

Communicatively, the dilemma outlined above is reflected in expectations of and pressure on corporations not only to launch concrete CSR initiatives, but also to communicate openly about these initiatives to and with their stakeholders. Hence, as demonstrated in our review, corporations are expected to submit information via corporate websites, CSR reports and codes of conduct, and to carefully pay attention to stakeholders’ voices, perceptions, beliefs and attitudes regarding their CSR performances. However, as pointed out in our findings, a backlash occurs as a result of “the self-promoter paradox” embedded in CSR communication, when businesses try to hide their self-interested motivations behind an alleged ethical urge to “do good.” A backlash may also occur when businesses fail to balance their words with their actions, disclosing signs of inauthenticity or evoking skepticism and cynicism leading to accusations of hypocrisy and window dressing from critical stakeholders ( Christensen et al. , 2013 ; Wagner et al. , 2009 ). The pressure on legitimacy thus speaks for itself. However, under these circumstances the acts of gaining legitimacy are often transferred into acts of restoring or repairing legitimacy as a means for corporations to keep their “license to operate.” CSR communication, then, tends to become an issue of risk management. Looking at this risk management scenario as a communication framework allows us to gain deeper insights into the dilemma from a legitimacy perspective. The result of the backlash in CSR communication is that its contribution to corporate legitimacy is challenged. Only in situations in which promotion and morality can be sufficiently aligned – e.g. when a corporation has a strong historical record of CSR, thanks to several years of CSR practices, and/or adopts a strategy of communication in which dialogue, interaction and collaboration overrule exaggerated promotion and lofty promises – does CSR communication have the potential to enhance corporate legitimacy, whereby CSR communication can turn into an issue of collaborative stakeholder management.

Limitations

As usual, this investigation may have a number of potential shortcomings restricting its validity.

First, our review of CSR communication is based on a sample of research articles published over the past 15 years, which is a limited period of time; i.e. it does not take into account CSR communication research published prior to 2000. Second, our adoption of a narrow set of keywords for our search, focusing on CSR communication, excluded publications that are more marginal in terms of dealing with communication problems and issues of CSR. Third, the fact that our sample is extracted from selected databases (ABI/INFORM, EBSCO’s Business Source Complete, CMMC and JSTOR) means that it does not necessarily represent the totality of potential outlets and books that publish research within the field of CSR communication.

Implications for future research

CSR communication is an emerging field that helps to expand our understanding of how CSR is addressed communicatively by both strategic management and communication scholars and practitioners. As shown in our review, the communication vantage point is addressed as a narrow discipline, conceptualizing CSR communication as a set of isolated operations and practices that may increase businesses’ market positions and the attitudes and beliefs of their stakeholders through CSR corporate messaging, channels and media monitored by managers. However, communication is also approached as a broad strategic discipline embracing CSR communication as a field of organizing, understanding, making sense of and collaborating about CSR. The broad approach to CSR communication is slowly emerging in step with new political global agendas followed by a holistic, critical and more societal trend that has appeared through the bridging of corporate and organizational communication ( Christensen and Cornelissen, 2011 ), and through an increasing reluctance to see new capitalism as a possible framework for future growth and for businesses in society ( Fleming and Jones, 2013 ).

On the basis of this, we believe that studies within the following three areas or topics could take CSR communication research a step forward: studies that link CSR communication to a broader and more holistic concept of corporate communication and related fields (i.e. stakeholder interaction, corporate branding, public relations, etc.); empirical studies that provide more in-depth insights into the stakeholder benefits and legitimacy of CSR communication; and studies of message and media factors, e.g. the characteristics and appropriateness of channels and media for CSR messages/interaction and the appropriateness of rhetorical elements. Moreover, we believe that linking company-specific studies to the above three focus areas could increase our understanding of CSR communication as an international and intercultural issue.

From a practical perspective, our findings indicate that organizations could benefit from developing their CSR communication strategies and practices in collaboration with local and global actors and stakeholders if their aim is to increase their legitimacy. It might, for example, be a good decision for organizations which are primarily one-way oriented – be it in traditional or social media communication – to rethink their CSR communication strategies aligning them to more collaborative forms and co-creative processes with their stakeholders. In the same way, our study seems to indicate that creating stakeholder value and engagement requires a dialogical approach.

Finally, organizations could increase their opportunities to achieve corporate legitimacy by bonding in corporate activist processes to cope with global CSR issues and participate more proactively in joint CSR projects and solutions with the aim of enhancing the role of business in society.

Analytical framework: gaining legitimacy through CSR communication

Abu Bakar , A.S. and Ameer , R. ( 2011 ), “ Readability of corporate social responsibility communication in Malaysia ”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , Vol. 18 , pp. 50 - 60 , available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.240

Amazeen , M. ( 2011 ), “ Gap (RED): social responsibility campaign or window dressing? ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 99 No. 2 , pp. 167 - 182 .

Andriof , J. and Waddock , S. ( 2002 ), “ Unfolding stakeholder engagement ”, in Andriof , J. , Waddock , S. , Husted , B. and Sutherland Rahman , S. (Eds), Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking: Theory, Responsibility and Engagement , Greenleaf Publishing , Sheffield , pp. 19 - 42 .

Arvidsson , S. ( 2010 ), “ Communication of corporate social responsibility: a study of the views of management teams in large companies ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 96 No. 2 , pp. 339 - 354 .

Ashforth , B.E. and Gibbs , B.W. ( 1990 ), “ The double-edge of organizational legitimation ”, Organization Science , Vol. 1 , pp. 177 - 194 .

Banytė , J. and Gadeikienė , A. ( 2008 ), “ Corporate social responsibility as a marketing means in Lithuanian business practice ”, Economics and Management , Vol. 13 , pp. 227 - 238 .

Becker-Olsen , K.L. , Taylor , C.R. , Hill , R.P. and Yalcinkaya , G. ( 2011 ), “ A cross-cultural examination of corporate social responsibility marketing communications in Mexico and the United States: strategies for global brands ”, Journal of International Marketing , Vol. 19 No. 2 , pp. 30 - 44 .

Bendell , J. ( 2010 ), “ World review ”, Journal of Corporate Citizenship , Vol. 40 , pp. 6 - 25 .

Benn , S. , Todd , L. and Pendleton , J. ( 2010 ), “ Public relations leadership in corporate social responsibility ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 96 No. 3 , pp. 403 - 423 .

Bhattacharya , C.B. , Korschun , D. and Sen , S. ( 2009 ), “ Strengthening stakeholder-company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility initiatives ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 85 No. 2 , pp. 257 - 272 .

Bilowol , J. and Doan , M.A. ( 2015 ), “ Multinational corporations’ role in developing Vietnam’s public relations industry through corporate social responsibility ”, Public Relations Review , Vol. 41 No. 5 , pp. 825 - 832 .

Bravo , R. , Matute , J. and Pina , J. ( 2012 ), “ Corporate social responsibility as a vehicle to reveal the corporate identity: a study focused on the websites of Spanish financial entities ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 107 No. 2 , pp. 129 - 146 .

Brennan , N. , Merkl-Davies , D. and Beelitz , A. ( 2013 ), “ Dialogism in corporate social responsibility communications: conceptualising verbal interaction between organisations and their audiences ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 115 No. 4 , pp. 665 - 679 .

Briner , R.B. , Denyer , D. and Rousseau , D.M. ( 2009 ), “ Evidence-based management: concept cleanup time? ”, Academy of Management Perspectives , Vol. 23 No. 4 , pp. 19 - 32 .

Burchell , J. and Cook , J. ( 2006 ), “ Assessing the impact of stakeholder dialogue: changing relationships between NGOs and companies ”, Journal of Public Affairs , Vol. 6 Nos 3/4 , pp. 210 - 227 .

Burchell , J. and Cook , J. ( 2008 ), “ Stakeholder dialogue and organisational learning: changing relationships between companies and NGOs ”, Business Ethics: A European Review , Vol. 17 No. 1 , pp. 35 - 46 .

Carroll , A.B. and Shabana , K.M. ( 2010 ), “ The business case for corporate social responsibility: a review of concepts, research and practice ”, International Journal of Management Reviews , Vol. 12 No. 1 , pp. 85 - 105 .

Castello , I. and Lozano , J.M. ( 2011 ), “ Searching for new forms of legitimacy through corporate responsibility rhetoric ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 100 No. 1 , pp. 9 - 21 .

Cho , S. and Kim , C.Y. ( 2012 ), “ Corporate social responsibility (CSR) as a halo effect in issue management: public response to negative news about pro-social local private companies ”, Asian Journal of Communication , Vol. 22 No. 4 , pp. 372 - 385 .

Chong , M. ( 2009 ), “ Employee participation in CSR and corporate identity: insights from a disaster-response program in the Asia-Pacific ”, Corporate Reputation Review , Vol. 12 No. 2 , pp. 106 - 119 .

Christensen , L.T. and Cornelissen , J.P. ( 2011 ), “ Bridging corporate and organizational communication: review, development and a look to the future ”, Management Communication Quarterly , Vol. 25 No. 3 , pp. 383 - 414 .

Christensen , L.T. , Morsing , M. and Thyssen , O. ( 2013 ), “ CSR as aspirational talk ”, Organization , Vol. 20 No. 3 , pp. 372 - 393 .

Chun , R. ( 2005 ), “ Corporate reputation: meaning and measurement ”, International Journal of Management Reviews , Vol. 7 No. 2 , pp. 91 - 109 .

Clark , C.E. ( 2000 ), “ Differences between public relations and corporate social responsibility: an analysis ”, Public Relations Review , Vol. 26 No. 3 , pp. 363 - 380 .

Coombs , T. and Holladay , S. ( 2012 ), Managing Corporate Social Responsibility: A Communication Approach , Wiley-Blackwell , Malden, MA .

Cornelissen , J. ( 2011/2014 ), Corporate Communication. A Guide to Theory and Practice , 3rd and 4th ed. , Sage Publications , London .

Cortini , M. ( 2009 ), “ New horizons in CSP and employee/employer relationship: challenges and risks of corporate weblogs ”, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal , Vol. 21 No. 4 , pp. 291 - 303 .

Crane , A. and Glozer , S. ( 2016 ), “ Researching CSR communication: themes, opportunities and challenges ”, Journal of Management Studies , Vol. 53 No. 7 , pp. 1223 - 1252 .

Crane , A. , Palazzo , G. , Spence , L.J. and Matten , D. ( 2014 ), “ Contesting the value of the shared value concept ”, California Management Review , Vol. 56 No. 2 , pp. 130 - 153 .

Dawkins , J. ( 2004 ), “ Corporate responsibility: the communication challenge ”, Journal of Communication Management , Vol. 9 No. 2 , pp. 108 - 119 .

Demetriou , M. , Papasolomou , J. and Vrontis , D. ( 2010 ), “ Cause-related marketing: building the corporate image while supporting worthwhile causes ”, Journal of Brand Management , Vol. 17 No. 4 , pp. 266 - 278 .

Demetriou , M.M. and Aristotelous , C. ( 2011 ), “ Is a bank expected to play the role of a non-profit organization? How do its stakeholders feel about it? ”, Journal of Institute of Public Enterprise , Vol. 34 Nos 1/2 , pp. 91 - 108 .

Dobers , P. and Delyse , S. ( 2010 ), “ Corporate social responsibility: discourse, narratives and communication ”, Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management , Vol. 17 No. 2 , pp. 63 - 69 .

Du , S. and Vieira , E. ( 2012 ), “ Striving for legitimacy through corporate social responsibility: insights from oil companies ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 110 No. 4 , pp. 413 - 427 .

Du , S. , Bhattacharya , C.B. and Sen , S. ( 2010 ), “ Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): the role of CSR communication ”, International Journal of Management Reviews , Vol. 12 No. 1 , pp. 8 - 19 .

Du , S. , Swaen , V. , Lindgreen , A. and Sen , S. ( 2013 ), “ The roles of leadership styles in corporate social responsibility ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 114 No. 1 , pp. 155 - 169 .

Dubbink , W. , Johan , G. and Luc van , L. ( 2008 ), “ CSR, transparency and the role of intermediate organisations ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 82 No. 2 , pp. 391 - 406 .

Dutta , K. and Singh , S. ( 2013 ), “ Customer perception of CSR and its impact on retailer evaluation and purchase intention in India ”, Journal of Services Research , Vol. 13 No. 1 , pp. 111 - 134 .

Elving , W.J.L. ( 2013 ), “ Scepticism and corporate social responsibility communications: the influence of fit and reputation ”, Journal of Marketing Communications , Vol. 19 No. 4 , pp. 277 - 292 .

Elving , W.J.L. , Golob , U. , Podnar , K. , Nielsen , A.E. and Thomsen , C. ( 2015 ), “ The bad, the ugly and the good: new challenges for CSR communication ”, Corporate Communications: An International Journal , Vol. 20 No. 2 , pp. 118 - 127 .

European Commission ( 2011 ), “ Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions: a renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for corporate social responsibility ”, available at: www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/com/com_com(2011)0681_/com_com(2011)0681_en.pdf (accessed July 20, 2017 ).

Fassin , Y. and Van Rossem , A. ( 2009 ), “ Corporate governance in the debate on CSR and ethics: sense making of social issues in management by authorities and CEO’s ”, Corporate Governance: An International Review , Vol. 17 No. 5 , pp. 573 - 593 .

Ferns , B. , Emelianova , O. and Sethi , S.P. ( 2008 ), “ In his own words: the effectiveness of CEO as spokesperson on CSR-sustainability issues – analysis of data from the Sethi CSR monitor ”, Corporate Reputation Review , Vol. 11 No. 2 , pp. 116 - 129 .

Fieseler , C. ( 2011 ), “ On the corporate social responsibility perceptions of equity analysts ”, Business Ethics: A European Review , Vol. 20 No. 2 , pp. 131 - 147 .

Fieseler , C. and Fleck , M. ( 2013 ), “ The pursuit of empowerment through social media: structural social capital dynamics in CSR-blogging ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 118 No. 4 , pp. 759 - 775 .

Fieseler , C. , Fleck , M. and Meckel , M. ( 2010 ), “ Corporate social responsibility in the blogosphere ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 91 No. 4 , pp. 599 - 614 .

Fleming , P. and Jones , M. ( 2013 ), “ The end of corporate social responsibility: crisis and critique ”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science , Vol. 32 No. 1 , pp. 19 - 23 .

Frankental , P. ( 2001 ), “ Corporate social responsibility – a PR invention? ”, Corporate Communications an International Journal , Vol. 6 No. 1 , pp. 18 - 23 .

Fraustino , J.D. and Connolly-Ahern , C. ( 2015 ), “ Corporate associations written on the wall: publics’ responses to Fortune 500 ability and social responsibility Facebook posts ”, Journal of Public Relations Research , Vol. 27 No. 5 , pp. 452 - 474 .

Garre-Rubio , M. , García-Barriocanal , E. , Siakas , K. , Sicilia , M.A. , Koinig , S. , Messnarz , R. and Clarke , A. ( 2012 ), “ Analysing the corporate responsibility Web pages of consumer electronics companies: implications for process improvement ”, IET Software , Vol. 6 No. 5 , pp. 451 - 460 .

Garriga , E. and Melé , D. ( 2004 ), “ Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory ”, Journal of Business Ethic , Vol. 53 Nos 1-2 , pp. 51 - 71 .

Golob , U. and Podnar , K. ( 2014 ), “ Critical points of CSR-related stakeholder dialogue in practice ”, Business Ethics: A European Review , Vol. 23 No. 3 , pp. 248 - 257 .

Golob , U. , Lah , M. and Jančič , Z. ( 2008 ), “ Value orientations and consumer expectations of corporate social responsibility ”, Journal of Marketing Communications , Vol. 14 No. 2 , pp. 83 - 96 .

Golob , U. , Johansen , T. , Nielsen , A. and Podnar , K. ( 2014 ), “ Corporate social responsibility as a Messy problem: linking systems and sensemaking perspectives ”, Systemic Practice and Action Research , Vol. 27 No. 4 , pp. 363 - 376 .

Golob , U. , Podnar , K. , Elving , W.J. , Nielsen , A.E. , Thomsen , C. and Schultz , F. ( 2013 ), “ CSR communication: Quo Vadis? ”, Corporate Communication: An International Journal , Vol. 18 No. 2 , pp. 176 - 192 .

Gruber , V. , Kaliauer , M. and Schegelmilch , B. ( 2017 ), “ Improving the effectiveness and credibility of corporate social responsibility messaging: an Austrian model identifies influential CSR content and communication channels ”, Journal of Advertising Research , Vol. 57 No. 4 , pp. 397 - 409 .

György , L. and Oravecz , A. ( 2009 ), “ CSR communication of corporate enterprises in Hungary ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 84 No. 29 , pp. 137 - 149 .

Heras-Saizarbitoria , I. and Boiral , O. ( 2013 ), “ ISO 9001 and ISO 14001: towards a research agenda on management system standards ”, International Journal of Management Reviews , Vol. 15 No. 1 , pp. 47 - 65 .

Hristache , D.A. , Paicu , C.E. and Ismail , N. ( 2013 ), “ Corporate social responsibility and organizational identity in post-crisis economy ”, Theoretical and Applied Economics , Vol. 1 No. 578 , pp. 113 - 120 .

Hsieh , H.-F. and Shannon , S.E. ( 2005 ), “ Three approaches to qualitative content analysis ”, Qualitative Health Research , Vol. 15 No. 9 , pp. 1277 - 1288 .

Hughes , P. and Demetrious , K. ( 2006 ), “ Engaging with stakeholders or constructing them? ”, Journal of Corporate Citizenship , Vol. 23 , pp. 93 - 101 .

Ihlen , Ø. , Bartlett , J. and May , S. (Eds) ( 2011 ), Handbook of Communication and Corporate Social Responsibility , Wiley-Blackwell , Oxford .

Illia , L. , Romenti , S. , Rodríguez-Cánovas , B. , Murtarelli , G. and Carroll , C. ( 2017 ), “ Exploring corporations’ dialogue about CSR in the digital era ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 146 No. 1 , pp. 39 - 58 .

Ingenhoff , D. and Koelling , A.M. ( 2012 ), “ Media governance and corporate social responsibility of media organizations: an international comparison ”, Business Ethics: A European Review , Vol. 21 No. 2 , pp. 154 - 167 .

Jackson , C. and Bundgard , T. ( 2002 ), “ Achieving quality in social reporting: the role of surveys in stakeholder consultation ”, Business Ethics: A European Review , Vol. 11 No. 3 , pp. 253 - 259 .

Jahdi , K. and Acikdilli , G. ( 2009 ), “ Marketing communications and corporate social responsibility (CSR): marriage of convenience or shotgun wedding? ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 88 No. 1 , pp. 103 - 113 .

Kaplan , S.E. and Ruland , R.G. ( 1991 ), “ Positive theory, rationality and accounting regulation ”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting , Vol. 2 No. 4 , pp. 361 - 374 .

Kim , S.Y. and Park , H. ( 2011 ), “ Corporate social responsibility as an organizational attractiveness for prospective public relations practitioners ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 103 No. 4 , pp. 639 - 653 .

Komodromos , M. and Melanthiou , Y. ( 2014 ), “ Corporate reputation through strategic corporate social responsibility: insights from service industry companies ”, Journal of Promotion Management , Vol. 20 No. 4 , pp. 470 - 480 .

Konrad , A. , Martinuzzi , A. and Steurer , R. ( 2008 ), “ When business associations and a federal ministry jointly consult civil society: a CSR policy case study on the development of the CSR Austria guiding vision ”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , Vol. 15 , pp. 270 - 280 .

Lawton , T. , McGuire , S. and Rajwani , T. ( 2013 ), “ Corporate political activity: a literature review and research agenda ”, International Journal of Management Reviews , Vol. 15 No. 1 , pp. 86 - 105 .

Liedtka , J. ( 2008 ), “ Strategy making and the search for authenticity ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 80 No. 2 , pp. 237 - 248 .

Lielgaidina , L. , Berzina , L. and Geipele , I. ( 2012 ), “ Corporate social responsibility and mass media: Latvian case ”, Economics and Management , Vol. 17 No. 1 , pp. 335 - 341 .

McShane , L. and Cunningham , P. ( 2012 ), “ To thine own self be true? Employees’ judgments of the authenticity of their organization’s corporate social responsibility program ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 108 No. 1 , pp. 81 - 100 .

Maggio-Muller , K. and Evans , M. ( 2008 ), “ Culture, communications and business ”, International Journal of Market Research , Vol. 50 No. 2 , pp. 169 - 180 .

Maignan , I. and Ferrell , O.C. ( 2004 ), “ Corporate social responsibility and marketing: an integrative framework ”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science , Vol. 32 No. 1 , pp. 19 - 23 .

Middlemiss , N. ( 2003 ), “ Authentic not cosmetic: CSR as brand enhancement ”, Journal of Brand Management , Vol. 10 Nos 4/5 , pp. 353 - 361 .

Miller , D. , Merrilees , B. and Yakimova , R. ( 2014 ), “ Corporate rebranding: an integrative review of major enablers and barriers to the rebranding process ”, International Journal of Management Reviews , Vol. 16 No. 3 , pp. 265 - 289 , available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12020

Morsing , M. ( 2006 ), “ Corporate social responsibility as strategic auto-communication: on the role of external stakeholders for member identification ”, Business Ethics: A European Review , Vol. 15 No. 2 , pp. 171 - 182 .

Morsing , M. , Schultz , M. and Nielsen , K.U. ( 2008 ), “ The ‘Catch 22’ of communicating CSR: findings from a Danish study ”, Journal of Marketing Communications , Vol. 14 No. 2 , pp. 97 - 111 .

Muijen , H.S.C.A. ( 2004 ), “ Corporate social responsibility starts at university ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 53 Nos 1-2 , pp. 235 - 246 .

Nielsen , A.E. and Thomsen , C. ( 2009 ), “ Investigating CSR communication in SMEs: a case study among Danish middle managers ”, Business Ethics: A European Review , Vol. 18 No. 1 , pp. 83 - 93 .

Nielsen , A.E. and Thomsen , C. ( 2012 ), “ Corporate social responsibility (CSR) management and marketing communication: research streams and themes ”, Hermes – Journal of Language and Communication in Business , Vol. 49 , pp. 49 - 65 .

Novo Nordisk ( 2015 ), “ NASDAQ Copenhagen, Danish Corporate Governance Recommendations ”, May 2013, available at: www.novonordisk.com/content/dam/Denmark/HQ/aboutus/documents/corporate-governance/trafficlights-nasdaq-recommendations-2018.pdf (accessed June 2018 ).

Núñez Ladevéze , L. , Irisarri , J.A. and Blanco-Steger Morales , B. ( 2015 ), “ The specific social responsibility of big television companies and risk contents ”, Communication and Society , Vol. 7 No. 1 , pp. 65 - 81 .

Nwagbara , U. ( 2013 ), “ The effects of social media on environmental sustainability activities of oil and gas multinationals in Nigeria ”, Thunderbird International Business Review , Vol. 55 No. 6 , pp. 689 - 697 .

Nwagbara , U. and Brown , C. ( 2014 ), “ Communication and conflict management: towards the rhetoric of integrative communication for sustainability in Nigeria’s oil and gas industry ”, Economic Insights – Trends and Challenges , Vol. 66 No. 4 , pp. 15 - 23 .

Nwagbara , U. and Reid , P. ( 2013 ), “ Corporate social responsibility communication in the age of new media: towards the logic of sustainability communication ”, Review of International Comparative Management/Revista de Management Comparat International , Vol. 14 No. 3 , pp. 400 - 414 .

O’Riordan , L. and Fairbrass , J. ( 2008 ), “ Corporate social responsibility (CSR): models and theories in stakeholder dialogue ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 83 No. 4 , pp. 745 - 758 .

Palazzo , G. and Scherer , A.G. ( 2006 ), “ Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: a communicative framework ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 66 No. 1 , pp. 71 - 88 .

Parquel , B. , Benoît-Moreau , F. and Larceneux , F. ( 2011 ), “ How sustainability ratings might deter ‘greenwashing’: a closer look at ethical corporate communication ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 102 No. 1 , pp. 15 - 28 .

Pedersen , E.R. ( 2006 ), “ Making corporate social responsibility (CSR) operable: how companies translate stakeholder dialogue into practice ”, Business and Society Review , Vol. 111 No. 2 , pp. 137 - 163 .

Peloza , J. and Shang , J. ( 2011 ), “ How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? A systematic review ”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science , Vol. 37 No. 1 , pp. 117 - 135 .

Pérez , A. and Rodríguez del Bosque , I. ( 2013 ), “ Customer personal features as determinants of the formation process of corporate social responsibility perceptions ”, Psychology and Marketing , Vol. 30 No. 10 , pp. 903 - 917 .

Podnar , K. ( 2008 ), “ Guest editorial: communicating corporate social responsibility ”, Journal of Marketing Communications , Vol. 14 No. 2 , pp. 75 - 81 .

Pollach , I. , Johansen , T.S. , Nielsen , A.E. and Thomsen , C. ( 2012 ), “ The integration of CSR into corporate communication in large European companies ”, Journal of Communication Management , Vol. 16 No. 2 , pp. 204 - 216 .

Pomering , A. and Dolnicar , S. ( 2009 ), “ Assessing the prerequisite of successful CSR implementation: are consumers aware of CSR initiatives? ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 85 No. 2 , pp. 285 - 301 .

Porter , M. and Kramer , M. ( 2011 ), “ Creating shared value: how to reinvent capitalism – and unleash a wave of innovation and growth ”, Harvard Business Review , Vol. 89 Nos 1/2 , pp. 62 - 77 .

Porter , M.E. and Kramer , M.R. ( 2006 ), “ Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility ”, Harvard Business Review , Vol. 84 Nos 1/2 , pp. 78 - 92 .

Prahalad , C.K. and Hart , S.L. ( 2002 ), “ The Fortune at the bottom of the pyramid ”, Strategy + Business , Vol. 26 , pp. 54 - 56 .

Rajandran , K. and Taib , F. ( 2014 ), “ Disclosing compliant and responsible corporations: CSR performance in Malaysian CEO statements ”, GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies , Vol. 14 No. 3 , pp. 143 - 157 .

Reinig , C. and Tilt , C.A. ( 2009 ), “ Corporate social responsibility issues in media releases: a stakeholder analysis of Australian banks ”, Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting , Vol. 2 No. 2 , pp. 176 - 197 .

Reynolds , M.A. and Yuthas , K. ( 2008 ), “ Moral discourse and corporate social responsibility reporting ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 78 Nos 1/2 , pp. 47 - 64 .

Roostalu , L. and Kooskora , M. ( 2010 ), “ Budgeting as a means for communicating CSR: the case of the Tallinn city government ”, EBS Review , Vol. 27 , pp. 38 - 54 .

Scheinbaum , A.C. , Lacey , R. and Liang , M.-C. ( 2017 ), “ Communicating corporate responsibility to fit consumer perceptions: how sincerity drives event and sponsor outcomes ”, Journal of Advertising Research , Vol. 57 No. 4 , pp. 410 - 421 .

Scherer , A.G. and Palazzo , G. ( 2007 ), “ Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective ”, The Academy of Management Review , Vol. 32 No. 4 , pp. 1096 - 1120 .

Scherer , A.G. and Palazzo , G. ( 2011 ), “ The new political role of business in a globalized world: review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy ”, Journal of Management Studies , Vol. 48 No. 5 , pp. 899 - 931 .

Schultz , F. , Castelló , I. and Morsing , M. ( 2013 ), “ The construction of corporate social responsibility in network societies: a communication view ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 115 No. 4 , pp. 681 - 692 .

Schultz , F. , Morsing , M. and Castello , I. ( 2013 ), “ The construction of corporate social responsibility in network societies: a communication view ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 115 No. 4 , pp. 681 - 692 .

Secchi , D. ( 2007 ), “ Utilitarian, managerial and relational theories of corporate social responsibility ”, International Journal of Management Reviews , Vol. 9 No. 4 , pp. 347 - 373 .

Seele , P. and Lock , I. ( 2015 ), “ Instrumental and/or deliberative? A typology of CSR communication tools ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 131 No. 2 , pp. 401 - 414 .

Shell ( 2015 ), “ How we report ”, available at: www.shell.com/sustainability/sustainability-reporting-and-performance-data/how-we-report.html (accessed November 2016 ).

Skard , S. and Thorbjørnsen , H. ( 2014 ), “ Is publicity always better than advertising? The role of brand reputation in communicating corporate social responsibility ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 124 No. 1 , pp. 149 - 160 .

Smith , N.C. , Palazzo , G. and Bhattacharya , C.B. ( 2010 ), “ Marketing’s consequences: stakeholder marketing and supply chain corporate social responsibility issues ”, Business Ethics Quarterly , Vol. 20 No. 4 , pp. 617 - 641 .

Sora , K. ( 2011 ), “ Transferring effects of CSR strategy on consumer responses: the synergistic model of corporate communication strategy ”, Journal of Public Relations Research , Vol. 23 No. 2 , pp. 218 - 241 , doi: 10.1080/1062726X.2011.555647 .

Stanalan , A. , Lwin , M. and Murphy , P. ( 2011 ), “ Consumer perceptions of the antecedents and consequences of corporate social responsibility ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 102 No. 1 , pp. 47 - 55 .

Steurer , R. ( 2010 ), “ The role of governments in corporate social responsibility: characterising public policies on CSR in Europe ”, Policy Sciences , Vol. 43 No. 1 , pp. 49 - 72 .

Stohl , C. , Etter , M. , Banghart , S. and Woo , D. ( 2017 ), “ Social media policies: implications for contemporary notions of corporate social responsibility ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 142 No. 3 , pp. 413 - 436 .

Suchman , M.C. ( 1995 ), “ Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches ”, Academy of Management Review , Vol. 20 No. 3 , pp. 729 - 757 .

Sungsook , A. ( 2015 ), “ The effect of luxury product pricing on consumers’ perceptions about CSR activities ”, Academy of Marketing Studies Journal , Vol. 19 No. 3 , pp. 1 - 14 .

Tata , J. and Prasad , S. ( 2015 ), “ CSR communication: an impression management perspective ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 132 No. 2 , pp. 765 - 778 .

Uysal , N. ( 2014 ), “ The expanded role of investor relations: socially responsible investing, shareholder activism, and organizational legitimacy ”, International Journal of Strategic Communication , Vol. 8 No. 3 , pp. 215 - 230 .

Valor , C. and Merino de Diego , A. ( 2009 ), “ Relationship of business and NGOs: an empirical analysis of strategies and mediators of their private relationship ”, Business Ethics: A European Review , Vol. 18 No. 2 , pp. 110 - 126 .

Vanhamme , J. and Grobben , B. ( 2009 ), “ Too good to be true! The effectiveness of CSR history in countering negative publicity ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 85 No. 2 , pp. 273 - 283 .

Van Riel , C.B.M. ( 1995 ), Principles of Corporate Communication , Prentice Hall , Harlow .

Vazquez-Brust , D.A. , Liston-Heyes , C. , Plaza-Úbeda , J.A. and Burgos-Jiménez , J. ( 2010 ), “ Stakeholders pressures and strategic prioritisation: an empirical analysis of environmental responses in Argentinean firms ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 91 No. S2 , pp. 171 - 192 , available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0612-0

Verboven , H. ( 2011 ), “ Communicating CSR and business identity in the chemical industry through mission slogans ”, Business Communication Quarterly , Vol. 74 No. 4 , pp. 415 - 431 .

Vilanova , M. , Lozano , J.M. and Arenas , D. ( 2009 ), “ Exploring the nature of the relationship between CSR and competitiveness ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 87 No. 1 , pp. 57 - 69 .

Wagner , R. and Seele , P. ( 2017 ), “ Uncommitted deliberation? Discussing regulatory gaps by comparing GRI 3.1 to GRI 4.0 in a political CSR perspective ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 146 No. 2 , pp. 333 - 351 .

Wagner , T. , Lutz , R.J. and Weitz , B.A. ( 2009 ), “ Corporate hypocrisy: overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions ”, Journal of Marketing , Vol. 73 No. 6 , pp. 77 - 91 .

Walker , M. , Kent , A. and Vincent , J. ( 2010 ), “ Communicating socially responsible initiatives: an analysis of US professional teams ”, Sport Marketing Quarterly , Vol. 19 No. 4 , pp. 187 - 195 .

Waller , R.L. and Conaway , R.N. ( 2011 ), “ Framing and counterframing the issue of corporate social responsibility ”, Journal of Business Communication , Vol. 48 No. 1 , pp. 83 - 106 .

Wang , A. and Anderson , R.B. ( 2011 ), “ A multi-staged model of consumer responses to CSR communications ”, Journal of Corporate Citizenship , Vol. 41 No. 1 , pp. 51 - 68 .

Wood , D.J. ( 2010 ), “ Measuring corporate social performance: a review ”, International Journal of Management Reviews , Vol. 12 , pp. 50 - 84 , doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00274.x .

Yong , S.S. , Jin , K.H. and Sung-Hack , L. ( 2012 ), “ Communication strategies for enhancing perceived fit in the CSR sponsorship context ”, International Journal of Advertising , Vol. 31 No. 1 , pp. 133 - 146 .

Ziek , P. ( 2009 ), “ Making sense of CSR communication ”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , Vol. 16 No. 3 , pp. 137 - 145 .

Further reading

COM ( 2001 ), “ Green paper – promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility ”, available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/soc-dial/csr/csr_responses.htm (accessed July 20, 2017 ).

Cornelissen , J.P. , van Bekkum , T. and van Ruler , B. ( 2006 ), “ Corporate communications: a practice-based theoretical conceptualization ”, Corporate Reputation Review , Vol. 9 , pp. 114 - 133 .

Noland , J. and Philips , R. ( 2010 ), “ Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management ”, International Journal of Management Reviews , Vol. 12 No. 1 , pp. 39 - 49 .

Pope , R. ( 2010 ), “ The making of social sponsorship ”, Journal of Sponsorship , Vol. 3 No. 3 , pp. 242 - 248 .

Pope , S. and Wæraas , A. ( 2016 ), “ CSR-washing is rare: a conceptual framework, literature review, and critique ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 137 No. 1 , pp. 173 - 193 .

Corresponding author

Related articles, we’re listening — tell us what you think, something didn’t work….

Report bugs here

All feedback is valuable

Please share your general feedback

Join us on our journey

Platform update page.

Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

Questions & More Information

Answers to the most commonly asked questions here

• Browse All Articles
• Newsletter Sign-Up

CorporateSocialResponsibilityandImpact →

No results found in working knowledge.

• Were any results found in one of the other content buckets on the left?
• Try removing some search filters.
• Use different search filters.

• Business Essentials
• Leadership & Management
• Credential of Leadership, Impact, and Management in Business (CLIMB)
• Entrepreneurship & Innovation
• Digital Transformation
• Finance & Accounting
• Business in Society
• For Organizations
• Support Portal
• Media Coverage
• Founding Donors
• Leadership Team

• Harvard Business School →
• HBS Online →
• Business Insights →

Business Insights

Harvard Business School Online's Business Insights Blog provides the career insights you need to achieve your goals and gain confidence in your business skills.

• Career Development
• Communication
• Decision-Making
• Earning Your MBA
• Negotiation
• News & Events
• Productivity
• Staff Spotlight
• Student Profiles
• Work-Life Balance
• AI Essentials for Business
• Alternative Investments
• Business Analytics
• Business Strategy
• Business and Climate Change
• Design Thinking and Innovation
• Digital Marketing Strategy
• Disruptive Strategy
• Economics for Managers
• Entrepreneurship Essentials
• Financial Accounting
• Global Business
• Launching Tech Ventures
• Leadership Principles
• Leadership, Ethics, and Corporate Accountability
• Leading with Finance
• Management Essentials
• Negotiation Mastery
• Organizational Leadership
• Power and Influence for Positive Impact
• Strategy Execution
• Sustainable Business Strategy
• Sustainable Investing
• Winning with Digital Platforms

5 Examples of Corporate Social Responsibility That Were Successful

• 06 Jun 2019

Business is about more than just making a profit. Climate change, economic inequality, and other global challenges that impact communities worldwide have compelled companies to be purpose-driven and contribute to the greater good .

In a recent study by Deloitte , 93 percent of business leaders said they believe companies aren't just employers, but stewards of society. In addition, 95 percent reported they’re planning to take a stronger stance on large-scale issues in the coming years and devote significant resources to socially responsible initiatives. With more CEOs turning their focus to the long term, it’s important to consider what you can do in your career to make an impact .

Access your free e-book today.

What Is Corporate Social Responsibility?

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a business model in which for-profit companies seek ways to create social and environmental benefits while pursuing organizational goals, like revenue growth and maximizing shareholder value .

Today’s organizations are implementing extensive corporate social responsibility programs, with many companies dedicating C-level executive roles and entire departments to social and environmental initiatives. These executives are commonly referred to as a chief officer of corporate social responsibility or chief sustainability officer (CSO).

There are many types of corporate social responsibility and CSR might look different for each organization, but the end goal is always the same: Do well by doing good . Companies that embrace corporate social responsibility aim to maintain profitability while supporting a larger purpose.

Rather than simply focusing on generating profit, or the bottom line, socially responsible companies are concerned with the triple bottom line , which considers the impact that business decisions have on profit, people, and the planet.

It’s no coincidence that some of today’s most profitable organizations are also socially responsible. Here are five examples of successful corporate social responsibility you can use to drive social change at your organization.

5 Corporate Social Responsibility Examples

1. lego’s commitment to sustainability.

As one of the most reputable companies in the world, Lego aims to not only help children develop through creative play, but foster a healthy planet.

Lego is the first, and only, toy company to be named a World Wildlife Fund Climate Savers Partner , marking its pledge to reduce its carbon impact. And its commitment to sustainability extends beyond its partnerships.

By 2030, the toymaker plans to use environmentally friendly materials to produce all of its core products and packaging—and it’s already taken key steps to achieve that goal.

Over the course of 2013 and 2014, Lego shrunk its box sizes by 14 percent , saving approximately 7,000 tons of cardboard. Then, in 2018, the company introduced 150 botanical pieces made from sustainably sourced sugarcane —a break from the petroleum-based plastic typically used to produce the company’s signature building blocks. The company has also recently committed to removing all single-use plastic packaging from its materials by 2025, among other initiatives .

Along with these changes, the toymaker has committed to investing $164 million into its Sustainable Materials Center , where researchers are experimenting with bio-based materials that can be implemented into the production process.

Through all of these initiatives, Lego is well on its way to tackling pressing environmental challenges and furthering its mission to help build a more sustainable future.

Related : What Does "Sustainability" Mean in Business?

2. Salesforce’s 1-1-1 Philanthropic Model

Beyond being a leader in the technology space, cloud-based software giant Salesforce is a trailblazer in the realm of corporate philanthropy.

Since its outset, the company has championed its 1-1-1 philanthropic model , which involves giving one percent of product, one percent of equity, and one percent of employees’ time to communities and the nonprofit sector.

To date, Salesforce employees have logged more than 5 million volunteer hours . Not only that, but the company has awarded upwards of $406 million in grants and donated to more than 40,000 nonprofit organizations and educational institutions.

In addition, through its work with San Francisco Unified and Oakland Unified School Districts, Salesforce has helped reduce algebra repeat rates and contributed to a high percentage of students receiving A’s or B’s in computer science classes.

As the company’s revenue continues to grow, Salesforce stands as a prime example of the idea that profit-making and social impact initiatives don’t have to be at odds with one another.

3. Ben & Jerry’s Social Mission

At Ben & Jerry’s, positively impacting society is just as important as producing premium ice cream.

In 2012, the company became a certified B Corporation , a business that balances purpose and profit by meeting the highest standards of social and environmental performance, public transparency, and legal accountability.

As part of its overarching commitment to leading with progressive values, the ice cream maker established the Ben & Jerry’s Foundation in 1985, an organization dedicated to supporting grassroots movements that drive social change.

Each year, the foundation awards approximately $2.5 million in grants to organizations in Vermont and across the United States. Grant recipients have included the United Workers Association, a human rights group striving to end poverty, and the Clean Air Coalition, an environmental health and justice organization based in New York.

The foundation’s work earned it a National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy Award in 2014, and it continues to sponsor efforts to find solutions to systemic problems at both local and national levels.

Related : How to Create Social Change: 4 Business Strategies

4. Levi Strauss’s Social Impact

In addition to being one of the most successful fashion brands in history, Levi’s is also one of the first to push for a more ethical and sustainable supply chain.

In 1991, the brand created its Terms of Engagement , which established its global code of conduct regarding its supply chain and set standards for workers’ rights, a safe work environment, and an environmentally-friendly production process.

To maintain its commitment in a changing world, Levi’s regularly updates its Terms of Engagement. In 2011, on the 20th anniversary of its code of conduct, Levi’s announced its Worker Well-being initiative to implement further programs focused on the health and well-being of supply chain workers.

Since 2011, the Worker Well-being initiative has been expanded to 12 countries and more than 100,000 workers have benefited from it. In 2016, the brand scaled up the initiative, vowing to expand the program to more than 300,000 workers and produce more than 80 percent of its product in Worker Well-being factories by 2025.

For its continued efforts to maintain the well-being of its people and the environment, Levi’s was named one of Engage for Good’s 2020 Golden Halo Award winners, which is the highest honor reserved for socially responsible companies.

5. Starbucks’s Commitment to Ethical Sourcing

Starbucks launched its first corporate social responsibility report in 2002 with the goal of becoming as well-known for its CSR initiatives as for its products. One of the ways the brand has fulfilled this goal is through ethical sourcing.

In 2015, Starbucks verified that 99 percent of its coffee supply chain is ethically sourced , and it seeks to boost that figure to 100 percent through continued efforts and partnerships with local coffee farmers and organizations.

The brand bases its approach on Coffee and Farmer Equity (CAFE) Practices , one of the coffee industry’s first set of ethical sourcing standards created in collaboration with Conservation International . CAFE assesses coffee farms against specific economic, social, and environmental standards, ensuring Starbucks can source its product while maintaining a positive social impact.

For its work, Starbucks was named one of the world’s most ethical companies in 2021 by Ethisphere.

The Value of Being Socially Responsible

As these firms demonstrate , a deep and abiding commitment to corporate social responsibility can pay dividends. By learning from these initiatives and taking a values-driven approach to business, you can help your organization thrive and grow, even as it confronts global challenges.

Do you want to gain a deeper understanding of the broader social and political landscape in which your organization operates? Explore our three-week Sustainable Business Strategy course and other online courses regarding business in society to learn more about how business can be a catalyst for system-level change.

This post was updated on April 15, 2022. It was originally published on June 6, 2019.

About the Author

• SUGGESTED TOPICS
• The Magazine
• Newsletters
• Managing Yourself
• Managing Teams
• Work-life Balance
• The Big Idea
• Data & Visuals
• Reading Lists
• Case Selections
• HBR Learning
• Topic Feeds
• Account Settings
• Email Preferences

Corporate social responsibility

• Business management
• Corporate governance
• Business structures

Bringing the Environment Down to Earth

• Forest L. Reinhardt
• From the July–August 1999 Issue

Relentless Idealism for Tough Times

• HBR Editors
• From the June 2009 Issue

Marketing Meets Mission

• Myriam Sidibe
• From the May–June 2020 Issue

Copenhagen: Focus on the (Carbon) Negative

• Nicholas Eisenberger and David Gottesman
• December 07, 2009

3 Actions CEOs Must Take to Uphold U.S. Democracy

• Paul Polman
• January 20, 2021

Saving the Planet: A Tale of Two Strategies

• Roger Martin
• Alison Kemper
• From the April 2012 Issue

Research: People Use Less Energy When They Think Their Neighbors Care About the Environment

• Jon M. Jachimowicz
• Oliver Hauser
• Julie O’Brien
• Erin Sherman
• Adam Galinsky
• January 28, 2019

The Former CEO of Guardian on Using Values to Drive Strategic Planning

• Deanna Mulligan
• From the January–February 2021 Issue

From Business Models to "Betterness" Models

• Umair Haque
• May 06, 2010

How Board Members Really Feel About ESG, from Deniers to True Believers

• N. Craig Smith
• Ron Soonieus
• April 19, 2019

2009: The Year of Light Green

• Andrew Winston
• January 05, 2009

A Bretton Woods for the 21st Century

• Don Tapscott
• From the March 2014 Issue

Using Design Thinking to Help Nonprofits Fundraise

• Kathleen Kelly Janus
• June 07, 2018

Introducing Leading Green

• Paul Michelman
• May 30, 2008

What Makes an Office Building "Healthy"

• Joseph G Allen
• John D. Macomber
• April 29, 2020

How Fossil Fuel Divestment Falls Short

• Tom Johansmeyer
• November 04, 2022

The $300 House: The Energy Challenge

• Bob Freling
• November 08, 2010

The Internet Has Been a Colossal Economic Disappointment

• William H. Davidow
• March 30, 2015

The End of Corporate Social Responsibility

• Joseph Pine and James Gilmore
• December 26, 2007

Changing Employee Values: Deepening Discontent?

• M.R. Cooper
• B.S. Morgan
• L.B. Kaplan
• From the January 1979 Issue

Levi Strauss & Co.: Driving Adoption of Green Chemistry

• Robert Strand
• Martin Mulvihill
• July 01, 2016

CIBA-GEIGY Pharmaceuticals: Pharma International

• John A. Quelch
• July 28, 1989

Grameen Danone Foods Ltd., a Social Business

• V. Kasturi Rangan
• Katherine Lee
• September 13, 2010

Mibanco: Meeting the Mainstreaming of Microfinance

• Michael Chu
• Gustavo A. Herrero
• Jean Steege Hazell
• August 23, 2011

New Balance: Developing an Integrated CSR Strategy

• Vesela Veleva
• January 28, 2010

Jack Stack (B)

• Kirk O. Hanson
• David Bollier
• January 01, 1993

Esquel Group: Value Innovation Through Sustainable Supply Chains

• Suri Gurumurthi
• February 21, 2019

GNFC Neem Project: The Ecosystem of Shared Value

• Sandeep Goyal
• Amit Kapoor
• April 19, 2018

Apply Ethics Across Borders

• Harvard Business Publishing
• May 15, 2016

Cargill: The Risky Business of Integrating Climate Change and Corporate Strategy

• Andrew Hoffman
• April 18, 2017

Zipongo: Improving Health by Redesigning the Food Chain

• Ray A. Goldberg
• Juan Enriquez
• Kevin Liang
• March 24, 2015

Amazon.com, 2021

• John R. Wells
• Benjamin Weinstock
• Galen Danskin
• Gabriel Ellsworth
• August 03, 2015

The Ullens Center for Contemporary Art

• Mukti Khaire
• Nancy Hua Dai
• September 09, 2014

Divesting Harvard's Endowment

• Daniel Green
• Luis M. Viceira
• Holly Fetter
• October 19, 2020

Patagonia's Path to Carbon Neutrality by 2025

• Daniel M. Kammen
• Paul Hendricks
• Seren Pendleton-Knoll
• Vincent Stanley
• April 01, 2018

Big Boom Beverages: Fight or Flight?

• Stephen A. Greyser
• William Ellet
• May 26, 2020

GiveDirectly

• John Beshears
• Joshua R. Schwartzstein
• Tiffany Y. Chang
• Brian J. Hall
• March 07, 2018

BRL Hardy: Globalizing an Australian Wine Company

• Christopher A. Bartlett
• December 21, 2000

The Tulsa Massacre and the Call for Reparations

• Mihir A. Desai
• Suzanne Antoniou
• February 15, 2021

Sekem: Liberating a Vision, an Artistic Approach to Entrepreneurship

• Johanna Mair
• Christian Seelos
• July 28, 2004

Sanergy: Tackling Sanitation in Kenyan Slums, Teaching Note

• Jennifer Walske
• Laura D. Tyson

Levi Strauss & Co.: Driving Adoption of Green Chemistry, Teaching Note

Rbc and the microfit program, teaching note.

• Mark Arnison
• December 05, 2017

Popular Topics

Partner center.

Open Access is an initiative that aims to make scientific research freely available to all. To date our community has made over 100 million downloads. It’s based on principles of collaboration, unobstructed discovery, and, most importantly, scientific progression. As PhD students, we found it difficult to access the research we needed, so we decided to create a new Open Access publisher that levels the playing field for scientists across the world. How? By making research easy to access, and puts the academic needs of the researchers before the business interests of publishers.

We are a community of more than 103,000 authors and editors from 3,291 institutions spanning 160 countries, including Nobel Prize winners and some of the world’s most-cited researchers. Publishing on IntechOpen allows authors to earn citations and find new collaborators, meaning more people see your work not only from your own field of study, but from other related fields too.

Brief introduction to this section that descibes Open Access especially from an IntechOpen perspective

Want to get in touch? Contact our London head office or media team here

Our team is growing all the time, so we’re always on the lookout for smart people who want to help us reshape the world of scientific publishing.

Home > Books > Corporate Social Responsibility in the 21st Century

Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Report: A Case Study in the Basque Country

Submitted: 29 April 2022 Reviewed: 23 May 2022 Published: 17 August 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.105511

Cite this chapter

There are two ways to cite this chapter:

From the Edited Volume

Corporate Social Responsibility in the 21st Century

Edited by Muddassar Sarfraz

To purchase hard copies of this book, please contact the representative in India: CBS Publishers & Distributors Pvt. Ltd. www.cbspd.com | [email protected]

Chapter metrics overview

305 Chapter Downloads

Impact of this chapter

Total Chapter Downloads on intechopen.com

Total Chapter Views on intechopen.com

Overall attention for this chapters

This chapter illustrates the case of the Spanish company Telefónica SA, a world leader in the telecommunication industry. The main research question is to understand if social responsibility can play a main role in an uncertain scenario. Or better, understand how Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) can be organized, managed, and measured to be considered a sustainable choice detached from any greenwashing policy. In terms of the socioeconomic environment with the combination of external social and economic conditions that influence the operation and preformation of an organization, the company should be a system not only capable of generating profits but at the same time contributing to society and environmental protection, integrating social responsibility as a strategic investment in the framework of their competitive strategy, in their management tools and their operations. The analysis of this case study aims to offer a model of CSR analysis and measurement tools such as the social report for managers who will have to face the important challenges of sustainable growth in compliance with the 2030 Agenda and SDGs paradigm (Sustainable Development Goals).

• corporate social responsibility
• sustainability reporting
• social report
• business ethics
• environmental
• and corporate governance

Author Information

Vincenzo basile *.

• Doctor Europaeus in Business Science, Federico II University of Naples, Italy
• Economics and Business Management, Federico II University of Naples, Italy
• Master in Marketing and Service Management, Federico II University of Naples, Italy

*Address all correspondence to: [email protected]

“Responsabilidad means no perder nunca la capacidad de respuesta”.

José Ortega y Gasset

1. Introduction

If the concept of responsibility could be summed up in a single sentence, surely this quote from the Spanish philosopher would fully reflect its meaning. Responsibility, in fact, “never loses the ability to respond,” both to the challenges of current problems and the new generations. The debate on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR or corporate social responsibility CSR, according to the equivalent meaning of the English language) has taken on a particular consistency and liveliness in recent years [ 1 ]. The CSR dissemination policies adopted by the European Commission have stimulated the comparison between the different perspectives of the definition and analysis of the concept present on the international scene, offering a multitude of concepts of great interest [ 2 ]. The concept of CSR essentially means that they decide on their initiative to help improve society and make the environment cleaner [ 3 ]. As the European Union tries to identify common values by adopting a Charter of Fundamental Rights, it is natural to expect that a growing number of companies will increasingly recognize their responsibility and consider it one of the components of their own identity [ 4 ]. This responsibility is expressed toward employees and, more generally, all parties involved in the company’s business who can, in different ways and forms, affect its success [ 5 ]. The choice of Telefónica SA is due to the position of primary importance that it has managed to acquire in the last decade on the international political and economic stage, thanks to its continuous and proactive interest in issues such as social responsibility, the environmental issue, and sustainability [ 6 ]. It is a concrete case of a socially-oriented company in the context of the Spanish one that thanks to the push toward investment and liberalization policies in the last decade have managed to achieve economic growth rates of over 3.5% per year, despite having to address the crisis that in recent years has affected the entire world economy. When CSR constitutes a process of managing its relationships with a whole series of interested parties that can affect its free functioning, the commercial arguments are clear [ 7 ]. Consequently, CSR, as well as quality management, must be seen as an investment and not as a cost [ 8 ]. Firm roach that integrates financial, commercial, and social aspects, thus developing a long-term strategy that minimizes the risks associated with uncertainties [ 9 ]. Sarfraz et al. [ 10 ] stated that CSR has a moderating role in project financing decisions and environmental risk management, stakeholder, and credit risk assessment. Companies should realize their social responsibility not only nationally, but globally, including the entire production chain. The future challenge to be met is to determine how CSR can help achieve these objectives, namely, to build a dynamic and competitive knowledge-based economy based on cohesion.

2. Corporate social responsibility at a glance

2.1 theoretical contribution.

The first official input in this regard comes from the OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) and the ILO (International Labor Organization), international organizations that, since the second half of the seventies, define the first guidelines for companies’ multinationals. In 1992, the Rio De Janeiro Earth Summit was held to discuss the planet’s environmental problems and their links with the problems of social development. Here, various documents are approved for the commitment to environmental protection and sustainable development, including Agenda 21, or an action program for the international community (UN, States, Governments, NGOs, and the private sector) and the sustainable development of the planet. From 1994 to 1999, various resolutions of the European Parliament followed one another on specific issues relating to CSR: transparency of company relocations and restructuring and the introduction of social clauses in international agreements, social labels for categories of products, human rights, fair trade and supportive, etc. In 1998, the EU itself defined the first guidelines for large companies operating in its Member States, for more socially responsible management. The first major codification of guidelines for large companies operating in UN member states dates to 1999, with the birth of the Global Compact, an international initiative in support of nine universal principles relating to human rights, work, and the environment [ 11 ]. In 2000, the OECD drew up guidelines aimed at multinationals that contain the main cornerstones of CSR, and that involve the social partners and national governments. Through the guidelines, 30 governments require multinationals to operate in harmony with social and environmental [ 12 ] policies and expectations. In March 2000, the extraordinary European Council of Lisbon was held, dedicated to the economic and social issues of the European Union, capable of achieving sustainable economic growth with more and better jobs and greater social cohesion. With the publication of the Green Book 1 “Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility,” in July 2001, following the European Council of Gothenburg in June of the same year and the Communication of the European Commission relating to “Corporate social responsibility: a contribution of companies to sustainable development” of July 2002, the challenge is officially launched in determining how CSR can help achieve the Lisbon objective, opening a wide debate at international level on the very concept of CSR [ 13 ], defining the procedures for establishing a partnership aimed at encouraging the development of a European structure to promote this concept and the Community strategy for promoting it, illustrating proposals for actions aimed at the European institutions, the Member States, the social partners, business and consumer association actors, as well as to individual companies and other interested parties. Concerning the ethical notion of company economy, it is possible to identify different theoretical approaches, among which it is necessary first to mention the ethical theory and the utilitarian one [ 14 , 15 , 16 ]. According to the ethical orientation, the company should subordinate its behavior to ethical rules, even at the expense of profit [ 17 ]. The utilitarian perspective, on the other hand, argues that profit maximization contributes to better achieving collective well-being. The ethical doctrine puts in order the needs of competitiveness and profitability concerning the much nobler aims of a social nature [ 18 ]. On a diametrically opposite level, there is the utilitarian theory that refers to the iron laws of the market economy. According to this approach, it is the social ends that must be subordinated this time to economic ends. The pursuit of profit is always and in any case a duty and deserving of approval, regardless of the social repercussions it determines. It is true that the company essentially plays an economic role, consisting in producing wealth, that is, goods and services having a value greater than that of the factors used in the production process; however, for this value to be positive, the company must serve the needs of customers by enhancing and developing the resources at its disposal; otherwise, the value may also be negative, thus giving rise to the destruction of wealth. Thirdly, it would be possible to identify a logic of reconciliation based on a compromise between economic and social issues. Thirdly, it would be possible to identify a logic of reconciliation based on a compromise between economic and social issues. However, even this approach does not seem suitable for correctly identifying the corporate finalism, because it ends up not fully satisfying either type of request. Given that the knowledge first stated is now part of the cultural baggage of management, it is the last to be able to constitute a real competitive advantage for the modern company. In conclusion, it seems that the road to take is that of “an idea of ​​business development to be pursued continuously over long periods, because only in the long term does it become possible to synergistically combine needs that appear to be conflicting in the short term” ([ 19 ], pp. 792, 795; [ 20 ], p. 95).

2.2 What is meant by social responsibility today?

The term responsibility indicates the “congruence to an assumed commitment or behaviour, as it matters and implies the acceptance of every consequence, especially from the point of view of the moral and legal sanction” [ 21 ]. The responsibility, therefore, appears, even before being a category of law, as an ethical and moral category firmly linked to the human person. It must always be borne in mind that the violation of a written norm involves easily identifiable responsibilities, while the same cannot be said in the case of social responsibility where there are no probative norms. However, a plurality of meanings is attributed to the term social responsibility, since its definition changes depending on the historical moment and the environmental context in which the company operates; therefore, over time different configurations of sociality [ 22 ] have followed one another [ 23 ]. However, it should be emphasized that the problem of CSR does not consist in repairing the damage caused to the company in some way, in repairing those damages that benefit one’s interests or even in implementing philanthropic actions [ 24 ], and so on; rather, in posing the problem of the interrelationships existing between their purposes, their structures and their organization and the purposes, structures, and organization of the other subjects of the social system considered as a whole. It is also necessary to distinguish the content of social responsibility from the tools that guarantee the morality of behavior, such as external legal regulation, self-regulation, or the creation of an ethical corporate culture [ 25 ]. These tools constitute the reference ethical system and based on the latter; the content of social responsibility is judged. Matacena [ 26 ] speaks of the life cycle of the social problem and expresses the gradual recognition of the social implications and therefore social responsibility. However, it is important to underline that the problem of CSR does not consist in repairing the damages caused to society in some way, in repairing those damages that benefit one’s interests or even in implementing philanthropic actions, and so on, rather, in posing the problem of the interrelationships existing between one’s aims, structures, and organization and the aims, structures, and organization of the other subjects of the social system considered as a whole [ 27 ]. It is also necessary to distinguish the content of social responsibility tools that guarantee morality from behavior, such as external legal regulation, self-regulation, or the creation of an ethical corporate culture. These instruments constitute the ethical system of reference based on the last one that judges the content of social responsibility. Social responsibilities can be seen under a double aspect, subjective and objective. The area of external responsibility centers on responsibilities toward external groups. In any case, given that the activity of the company is unique and unitary, its responsibility must also be this is how the concept of global corporate responsibility is introduced: The company obtains the consent and legitimacy of its work from its interlocutors based on both economic and social results. Matacena [ 28 ] rightly observes that “if companies do not take on social responsibilities consistent with the intensity and extent of the existing interchange relationships with the environment, the companies themselves could be forced into spaces that are so narrow as to be non-vital. It follows that as the company’s economic power grows, the level of the social objectives it pursues must increase.” Given the undertaking of social responsibility by the company, this must inform third parties not only of the achievement of the economic objective, thus safeguarding its image as an effective economic transformer, but also of the pursuit of its social equilibrium, so “to use the ‘information as an instrument for the protection and maintenance of a correct social and societal climate, that is, of a state of controlled conflict that does not compromise its legitimacy and therefore its survival ” ([ 29 ], p. 76). Accurate mapping and definition of the so-called stakeholders already represent a significant contribution to the management of any organization. The stakeholder (evident the analogy with “stockholder” and “shareholder,” which documents the terms the action terminate) comes from a dated 1963 of the Stanford Research Institute (USA) and defines those groups without whose support an organization ceases to exist [ 30 ]. Etymologically, the word stakeholder is composed of “stake,” which means “interest in a company,” and “ holder, ” which means “ owner, holder ”; consequently, stakeholders indicate the bearers of the company, that is, those subjects, or groups, who depend on a single individual interest, be it cooperative or competitive, in the business of the company, and which must not necessarily be economic [ 31 ]. In essence, the stakeholders are direct and indirect to the overall business of the company, who are affected by the effects of its behavior in satisfying their needs and achieving its objectives [ 32 ]. Each organization, according to its nature, therefore, has a plurality of stakeholders, which can be divided into a) primary stakeholders, that is, those without whose continuous participation in the management the company cannot survive customers, capital holders, employees, investors, and suppliers; b) secondary stakeholders, that is, those who influence the company or are known by its but are not involved in transactions with the organization and do not jeopardize its survival [ 33 ]. It is possible to represent the relations between the company and the stakeholders in Figure 1 .

Company stakeholder’s representation. Source: Own elaboration.

The company, assuming a social responsibility, must therefore proceed as a preliminary step to the detailed identification of its stakeholders, to be able to reconcile their different legitimate interests, to resolve or at least mitigate the conflictual character that distinguishes the different requests put forward by the interlocutors. To this end, in the face of conflicting interests, it is appropriate to adopt a relational logic and negotiation and contractual method, which, by assigning “relative weights” to the requests made by the various stakeholders, allows them to be balanced in the conduct of the business [ 34 ].

2.3 Research design and methodology

This chapter investigates the following research question: “How does the CSR adopted by a leading international company in the telephonic industry?” The research methodology was qualitative and based on the Telefónica Sa case study [ 35 , 36 , 37 ] and key informants’ in-depth interviews with the top management [ 38 , 39 , 40 ]. The case study represents a strategy for doing research, which involves an empirical investigation of a particular contemporary phenomenon within its real-life context [ 41 ]. Furthermore, was considered a secondary source [ 42 ] for data collection. Common sources of secondary data for social science include reports, censuses, information collected by government departments, organizational records, and company data. Secondary data analysis can save time that would otherwise be spent collecting data and, particularly in the case of quantitative data, can provide larger and higher-quality databases that would be unfeasible for any individual researcher to collect on their own [ 43 ]. In addition, analysts of social and economic change consider secondary data essential, since it is impossible to conduct a new survey that can adequately capture past changes and/or developments [ 44 ]. Three semi-structured interviews were conducted in February and April 2010 and lasted for an average of 90 min. However, the authors conducted semi-structured interviews to avoid limiting the interviewees and the possible serendipity of any additional evidence that might be used to revise or strengthen our research. In particular, the authors interviewed: (a) Director at Telefónica; (b) Head of Internal Communications; (c) Head of Marketing (d) Director of Corporate Strategy; and (e) Global Human Resources Manager. The in-depth interviews [ 45 ] concerned questions on the corporate sustainability and organization of Telefónica SA activities related to stakeholders. The objective was to shed more light on the role of the company in enhancing sustainable development, and the enablers and barriers to the adoption of social reports [ 46 , 47 ].

The interview protocol framework is comprised of four stages: (a) ensuring interview questions align with research questions; (b) constructing an inquiry-based conversation; (c) receiving feedback on interview protocols; and (d) piloting the interview protocol . The author preserved the conversational and inquiry goals of the research act by including open-ended questions and discussions diverged from the interview guide, and the experts were encouraged to interact. The author collected data through interview notes, and tape recordings were utilized to allow for more consistent transcription [ 48 ]. The author adopted the two-pass process for data verification, notated the interview comparisons with audio files, and received written approval of the transcripts from the participants. Finally, after the validation and testing of the Telefónica sustainable model by the stakeholders and the questionnaire, the model was applied to another case study regarding different country setting where Telefónica operates (e.g., Latino America).

3. The case study Telefónica

3.1 telefónica group profile.

This chapter explains the strategy that Telefónica designed and implemented concerning CSR and the tools it uses. It was chosen for this work, from among Spanish companies, because of the impact of its CSR actions and the strength and coherence of its approaches. Telefónica is not just a “plant” of strategies, policies, and CSR actions but also actively participates in the development of tools to support these issues [ 49 ]. With the analysis of a company that applies CSR, the vision is complete, and we can draw a systemic picture of the ongoing process. Telefónica focuses its social responsibility as a relationship strategy with its stakeholders, and the value of the company [ 50 ] largely depends on how to make these contacts. The corporate strategy analysis highlights that the clear goal it wishes to achieve is to increase the trust of its stakeholders and the social responsibility of the companies with which it operates, which is essentially explained by the relationship it has with these external interlocutors. Telefónica S.A. is the largest Spanish telecommunications company and operates mainly in Spain and Latin America. It is one of the largest fixed and mobile telecommunications companies and is ranked third in the world after China Mobile and Vodafone. It was created in 1924, and until the liberalization of the market in 1997, Telefónica was the only telephone operator present in Spain and held a dominant position, with over 75%, in 2004. The Spanish government privatized the telephone market in 1997 and currently, Telefónica is a public company, without a controlling shareholder. Among the largest shareholdings are those of Banco Bilbao 2 and Caixa , whose shares of 5.17 and 5.013%, respectively, do not, however, allow control of the company [ 51 ]. The year before Movistar was born, the mobile telephony division of the company, the group operates mainly in Spain, the Czech Republic (with Český Telecom), the United Kingdom, Germany, the Isle of Man (acquiring O 2 ), Argentina (with Telefónica de Argentina), Brazil, Chile (with Telefónica Móviles), Peru (with Telefónica Móviles), Colombia (with the Movistar brand), Puerto Rico (with Telefónica Empresas and Telefónica Larga Distancia), China (with a 5% stake in China Netcom)- and Morocco (with Méditel), while in Portugal and Italy, it is a shareholder of the former monopolists Portugal Telecom and Telecom Italia. The internationalization strategy of the Telefónica group provides 40% of revenues from abroad and it operates in many countries that are developing. Today, it has fixed ADSL telephone lines and mobile telephone customers in 16 countries; it has a significant presence in Latin America and does business with nearly 50 different countries. The countries in which it operates are 1) Europe: Spain and Germany; 2) America: Colombia, Mexico, Peru, Guatemala, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Ecuador, Chile, Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil, Panama, and Venezuela; 3) Africa: Morocco. Establishing a precise and unambiguous strategy for managing relations between the interested parties of the Telefónica group is a difficult undertaking, and in fact, many actors participate in this process, as the following table shows ( Table 1 ).

Number and type of interlocutors of the Telefónica group.

Source: Telefónica S.A. company Web site updated to 2020.

The methodology used to conduct this study was an empirical analysis of Telefónica and the direct observation and study of the documentation on CSR plans and verification of the annual corporate responsibility reports [ 52 ]. The development of the guides on AENOR’s 3 CSR standards starts from Telefónica , differentiated into three levels of work where it is possible to study its strategy on social responsibility and the leadership position held by the group in the telecommunications industry.

3.2 Organization of CSR in Telefónica

Telefónica has a centralized unit within its organizational structure whose function is to coordinate the CSR strategy. Social responsibility is an integral part of its global strategy for this company. It is relevant that the organizational structure created to design and manage the CSR is integrated within the general management of reputation and brand. This form of organization is also highlighted by the functions of the general manager of corporate communication ( Figure 2 ). Furthermore, the profile of the heads of the general management and the communication professionals is relevant in light of the emphasis currently placed on the “brand,” so the choice of these people is made very carefully. In this structure, at the first level of Telefónica , there are the presidents of the companies of the group and the managing directors, and the president has significant importance in the four “staff” functions. The Directorate-General for Corporate Communication (with its CSR functions) is one of the components of this staff, and from this position, it supports the whole group, including the branches of Telefónica Peru, Telefónica Moviles, and Telefónica Latin America (Graph 7).

Organization chart of the Telefónica group. * Also responsible for the Secretariat of the Executive and Steering Committee. ** Logistics, systems and T-Gestiona. Source: Telefónica S.A.

In the representation of the organizational structure of the Telefónica group, there are several business divisions and, in addition to those included for personnel, there is the Directorate General on “development, planning and regulation” and one on “finance and resource sharing.” Furthermore, these two directorates-general members are members of the management committee and the presidents of the most important companies. In this matrix structure, the strategies, management systems, and management tools used are common and derived from the top business centers. The work assigned to the general management of reputation, brand, and CSR is to reproduce an idea of leadership, the champion of a specific objective. An important coordinating role is therefore required, due to the multinational nature of the company and the diversity of the Telefónica Group. The management principles include a focus on CSR, as well as on quality, which must permeate all the processes and activities of the company because its implementation must be transversal, and to be effective the commitment of each unit should be encouraged. In groups of companies such as Telefónica , the approach to CSR must be promoted at the central level, even when responsibility is assumed by each of the peripheral units; therefore, the only efficient solution is to have a good organization capable of managing CSR in the companies of the group. However, it must be clarified that in a company of Telefónica ’s size and history and given the territorial vastness in which it operates and the different nations in which it is present, there may be various CSR policies and actions within it. In this sense, the first reference to consider is the activity carried out by the Fundación Telefónica . As indicated in the graph, there is a directorate-general (DG) of institutional relations and the social action by the group largely corresponds to the work of its foundation. Another important organizational unit whose function has been included in the broader field of social responsibility is that of environmental responsibility. In the case of Telefónica , environmental developments have been promoted by Telefónica I + D 4 , which is one of the group’s support subsidiaries and acts as a catalyst for innovation activities.

4. Discussion

4.1 the csr strategy in telefónica.

As already indicated, the CSR strategy in Telefónica is an integral part of the reputation strategy. For Telefónica ’s Director of Corporate Responsibility, the importance of reputation is underlined by the collapse of the stock market in the 90s (twentieth century). The previous system was centered on the creation of value by keeping only two parties in check, namely the investors and the media, which proved insufficient. The different approach to CSR suggests that we must address the entire environment in which the company operates, taking care of its relationships with the community, its customers, employees, and society in general [ 53 ]. Telefónica launched its Proyecto de Reputación Corporativa (PRC) in November 2001, which outlined an operational plan that was then achieved over time and is described and discussed in the following paragraphs of which Andreu 5 himself became the bearer.

4.2 Proyecto de Reputación Corporativa (PRC)

The PRC has two objectives: 1) to identify the risks that could affect the reputation of the company in its daily relationship with its stakeholders; 2) to identify the common management lines that should be implemented in all business lines and in all countries to strengthen the reputation of the Telefónica Group and minimize the potential impact of risks deriving from non-pursuit of the latter. A transversal process was launched to achieve this goal with the group’s contribution from all the areas and management. A centralized approach was not considered effective since the reputation of the company is established through the daily activity of all the units. This first objective of identifying the dangers was achieved at the end of 2003, thus obtaining the basic information required to proceed with the PRC [ 54 ]. Figure 3 shows the risk identification process in its five phases, as well as the agents involved in each process and the results achieved.

Identification of corporate reputation risks in Telefónica. Source: Own elaboration.

All the general departments participate in the identification phase of the management objectives, with a total of 15 areas of analysis, which have identified their main operational targets. In the next phase, identifying the interest groups, the Telefónica Group is considered as a whole, identifying the relationships with the 40 types of agents, and the latter are categorized into eight interest groups: Customers, Investors and Shareholders, Staff, Partners, Regulators, Providers, Agency, Media. From what we read above, the partners and the media have been included in the list, which indicates the importance that the author of the project has granted them. Each area identifies the main relationships and the main comparison interfaces in the subgroups. The classification of interest groups in Telefónica has undergone some corrections, from the first version made in 2003, to the most recent and simplified version of 2005, which is used in the ordinary management. The risk identification phase of corporate responsibility was completed with the construction of a matrix, in which the forces in order are the interest group (the eight indicated) that could be affected by different types of risks, including Financial, Communicative, and Management, Technological, Social and Legal . The risks considered relate to the possibility of causing repercussions to the central corporate structure beyond their effects on isolated units. Although risks can be localized so as not to affect other units, such as the brand, one of the ongoing consequences of the global information environment is that, with an ever-increasing percentage of risks, they affect the entire corporate structure. More than 750 risks are identified, of which over 50% are included in the operational management, corresponding to the daily activities that take place in relationship with the stakeholders. In the risk analysis, 150 were selected, considered critical, with treatment priorities, and the two selection characteristics were damage caused and probability of occurrence. To manage the risks appropriately, they have been grouped according to the intangible element that is affected; eight groups of intangible items were considered as indicated in Table 2 .

Classification of corporate reputation risks at Telefónica.

Source: Telefónica S.A .

The higher risk of intangible elements affects the strategy and organization of Telefónica with 30% of the total, but much importance is also assumed by CSR in controlling these risk factors with a 20% incidence. In the phase of “contrasting the risks identified by the sectors of competence of the company,” the relationship between consequences and their criticality was tested with the opinion of the Telefónica units that have experience in dealing with these certain risk factors. Thus, to counter the critical issues in the relationship with investors, the analysis was carried out by the Investor Relations Department with particular attention given to the shareholders of Telefónica , while the risks associated with the company regarding quality and the environmental issue, as well as the technological risks, were analyzed by Telefónica I + D. In the last phase, “contrasting the risks identified by the interest groups,” different results are presented about the quality of the work carried out and the variables involved. Through this contrast, we get a) the external perception, which is always of great interest; b) information on the situation concerning other companies in the telephony sector, from which it is possible to obtain a “benchmark” concerning the best; and c) identification of the minimum management municipalities that minimize the reputational risks. To achieve this goal, we are working in three directions: 1. the creation of a self-management model: an integrated model of corporate reputation, Modelo Integrado de Reputación Corporativa (MIRC); 2. the definition of an institutional framework for Telefónica ; and 3. a workshop on corporate responsibility.

4.3 Modelo Integrado de Reputación Corporativa (MIRC)

The MIRC was designed to have a tool capable of organizing work related to reputational risks. The purpose of this tool is to ensure balance in “bringing value for all stakeholders in the long term... it is a guide to building a risk-proof reputation” ([ 55 ] 6 ). Telefónica recognizes a dual objective in the model: external, which benefits interest groups, and internal, which benefits society because it acts as a shield for possible risks. The MIRC is structured in three levels. The first level is the one that Telefónica represents and includes the four elements that represent the foundations of a company: 1) ethics (the only basis on which an organization based on trust can be built) [ 56 ]; 2) values ​​(as the ultimate reference of the conduct of a company); 3) the vision and mission (as the ultimate goal of the company); and 4) the strategy and organization (such as the way of working and procuring resources to achieve the mission). The second level is what Telefónica does, through the three main elements of corporate responsibility: 1) social responsibility (social action, the social impact of activities, safeguarding the environment); 2) corporate identity; and 3) corporate governance: transparency, control, and monitoring mechanisms on the implementation of Telefónica ’s strategies (Grant, 2006). The third level is what Telefónica maintains: “Communication with all our stakeholders, coherent and transparent, is the greatest capacity of the Group to generate more value than is possible through the economic aspects” (Trujillo, 2003). In the above description, it is noted that the source of value lies in the communication with all the companies of the group and with the whole community. Similarly, it is observed that the ability to generate value requires communication to adopt the certain characteristics of quality and effectiveness such as consistency and transparency. This is a major challenge for Telefónica ’s communications function, and therefore, for this reason, a great responsibility. For Telefónica , the management of corporate responsibility (or RC, Responsabilidad Corporativa ) presupposes that there is consistency in the three levels indicated and that there are no differences between the three postulates “what I am, what I do and what I say I do,” which represent the mantra of the group’s basic strategic vision [ 57 ].

4.4 Definition of an institutional framework for the group

Telefónica seeks to define a strengthened institutional framework to facilitate the development of CSR and mitigate the risks. With this objective, various projects have been implemented throughout the company: a) development of corporate values; b) code of business conduct—institutional presence; and c) the Foro de Reputación Corporativa (FRC). Through these large-scale projects, Telefónica implements strategic management, and plans, and integrated them through various actions. This management is reflected in the “discussion forums” organized over the years on CSR, and this has been one of the reasons for choosing Telefónica for this job as a harbinger and implementer of active and innovative strategies on corporate responsibility. The central value identified by Telefónica for development was the “trust,” which each interest group has received and that is reflected in the choices expressed in Table 3 .

The basic tools for building trust.

Source: Own processing of information on the Informe Anual de Responsabilidad Corporativa, 2006 by Telefónica S.A.

The communication campaign carried out by Telefónica in 2004 had the importance of “trust” as its basic value. This means that the company, as has been found in the various media (newspapers, radio, TV, etc.), has given priority to this aspect for the implementation of the MIRC. The relationship between communication and corporate responsibility will be highlighted as an application value in all types of tools used by the group, including periodic reports (annual and semi-annual reporting). The reputation strategy must be established on a real basis of excellence in a service, which requires the considerable effort by the whole organization. CSR plays an important role in empowerment, and in enhancing this effort. Telefónica , being a telecommunications service provider, had to manage intangible (non-cumulative) aspects concerning those of the products according to their characteristics [ 58 ]. In services, reliability is a determining factor; in fact, more contracts are formalized with operators that from experience can give a better service, full of quality, and transparency. Quality can include the customer’s degree of indifference to a repair, the certainty of a billing error, or the fact that the line is operational without interruption. Therefore, customer satisfaction will be the result of compliance with their expectations and the quality of service offered by the company [ 59 ]. The Corporate Code of Conduct, like other tools of its kind, is a framework for the integrity of professional relationships. It is inspired by the values ​​of the Telefónica Group, which translates into principles, which in turn governs the behavior of the staff and indicates the conduct toward their main interest groups and is based on the concepts of right and duty. Therefore, it is not “compulsory” conduct, but rather, it is embodied in behavior to be followed (Trujillo, 2004). Telefónica has an institutional presence in numerous permanent job forums, holding important positions in them. Table 4 shows some of the main forums in which the company participates, and the role played in each one.

Type of participation of Telefónica S.A.

Source: Own processing of data from Telefónica S.A.

The organizations listed above form the networks that promote CSR, with the different alliance relationships; in these partnerships, each organization is integrated and in close collaboration with the others and makes an important contribution to resolving the idiosyncrasies that may occur over time. The objective of the network is to develop CSR and training tools, such as the AENOR-CTN50 7 Technical Committee, which can monitor the added results and disseminate them through corporate communication. Looking at the sectoral forums, one observes, first, the diversity among them and their complementarity. Each forum can be defined by six characteristics (areas of implementation), and for each of these, there are two types (national and international). Furthermore, it indicates the characteristics (first column) and the possible types (second and fourth column). It also summarizes the number of holes in each feature (third and fifth column); the nine national forums are thus identified, while the remaining four are international ( Table 5 ).

Characteristics of permanent job openings with the institutional presence of Telefónica S.A.

Source: Own elaboration starting from Telefónica S.A. data.

Network availability and quality

The “democratization” of communication

Development of the information society

Development of new technology

Reduction of the economic gap, which is the basis of availability

Telefónica ’s expansion strategy makes extensive use of elements that, as indicated, narrow this digital divide. The concept of social responsibility “leads to the awareness that we are a powerful force for social, economic and technological development” [ 62 ]. In these statements, the general management on social responsibility and corporate reputation of Telefónica highlights the importance of the workers themselves, aware of the social impact of their daily activities. In almost every forum that Telefónica joined, the association was already active, that is, promoted by others; only in the case of the FRC (Foro de Reputación Corporativa) did it have a promoting and founding role. This is indicative of the synergy that has been achieved in partnerships between organizations that have a common goal; the creative effort was born from some subjects, while the resulting advantage is shared by all the organizations that ally. Furthermore, the benefits of the network are greater in terms of its breadth and influence, and to this extent, its strength is often found. The relative weight of Telefónica ’s size is the activity carried out by its representatives who are holders of a strategic position and who make a significant contribution to the policies implemented by the company, communicated through the forum. For Telefónica , the creation of the FRC responds to a common vision between 11 companies of the group, which makes it possible to obtain synergies through mutual collaboration. The common vision is therefore the following: “The value of intangible assets in the company is very important and corporate responsibility is a critical component of this aspect.” The strategy to fulfill this vision consists of “unearthing intangible assets that generate a better reputation that can increase the perceived value of the company” [ 63 ]. Considering these statements, the actions proposed in 2010 by Telefónica to develop a strategy for creating a greater reputation are as follows: a) identifying the best management methodologies for RC ( Responsabilidad Corporativa ), CSR ( Corporate Social Responsibility ), and ethics, which are integral for the FRC (benchmarking); b) promoting and disseminating the knowledge and management of RC; and c) promoting the creation of a stock index (national or European) for “responsible” companies. The actions are outlined to show how large companies have implemented the sharing of experiences and knowledge of the best management methodologies in the FRC plan, obtaining advantages from this strategic option. And in fact, the information that derives from it would seem more qualified and coherent than that obtained through external “benchmarking,” as used today by many companies. The second action of the FRC indicated by Telefónica relates to the promotion and dissemination of knowledge as well as the management of RC. It is therefore a general action for the promotion of RC on management concepts and systems. This type of generic promotion has an impact on all intangible assets, the value of which depends on widespread acceptance [ 64 ]. The third action proposed in the FRC concerns the creation of an equity index, in which the criterion of differentiation is CSR. In analyzing the impact that this index can have, it should be noted that this tool, like all those of this type, implies the following: I) the assessment of the reputation achieved by each company; II) the classification of company valuations and the reporting of the levels that need to be included in the stock index; and III) the increase in demand in the stock market and the valuation of the shares of companies that have a good score on the liability index. Once the desired results are achieved, an increase in the value of the company should be achieved through its intangible assets, which is the point of view held and shared by the companies that have implemented the FRC. It is noted that Telefónica , as a company committed to full immersion in this field, needs concrete results that allow it to make subsequent efforts by quantifying the results achieved. One of the most revealing findings from the analysis carried out in the previous table is that all the forums in which Telefónica participates develop some type of tool for the promotion of CSR. Among these, the Pacto Mundial , the GRI, the AENOR, and the Reputation Institute were created precisely for this purpose, or in them, the promotion of the CRS is at the center of the activity carried out. These, once involved in the analysis of the CSR, propose the measurement tools or guidelines to facilitate the implementation of strategic conduct [ 65 ]. A special case, different from the others, is the “forum of experts on corporate social responsibility” of the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs 12 , which, although not aimed at developing tools, carries out an information-gathering activity that could be an advantageous opportunity to achieve, shortly, the enactment of a law on corporate social responsibility in Spain. The promotion of a stock index, such as the one described above, did not seem outlined in the previous proposals as key points of application were more general : “Valuing intangible assets. Definition of development indicators and measurement systems for corporate reputation or related to quantifying the impact of corporate reputation policies: ethics, social responsibility, identity, brand, and corporate governance. Influence and interaction after between are the main intangible variables of corporate reputation” [ 55 ]. These measurement objectives are aimed at verifying the effectiveness of the actions undertaken and selecting the variables with the greatest impact; they are therefore the objectives of improving the methodology before 2004 the Telefónica Group was included in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DISI), after having achieved a score of 75 points for its leadership with sustainability criteria. Moreover, at the European level, the minimum is 72 points and global with the minimum of 70 points and starting from 2004 with the inclusion in the FTSE4Good 13 index, which uses, for the selection of companies, ethical, social, and environmental criteria applied through quantitative indicators. The latter consideration is so strong that there is a negative relationship between boardroom gender diversity and a firm’s financial performance. According to Ajaz et al. [ 66 ], females in boardrooms either cause negative effects or have no impact on the firm’s financial performance. Similarly, there is no significant relationship between the presence of women in boardrooms and a firm’s reputation.

4.5 Corporate Reputation (CR) workshop

The implementation of the plans described by Telefónica ’s CR requires sharing and implementation by all management areas in the various countries where the group operates. Therefore, the general manager has set up a series of workshops 14 to facilitate the learning of methodologies to promote responsibility in the different areas. This is done through the analysis of “best practices,” through the strategic analysis of future growth scenarios in terms of sustainability and development, but also thanks to other more creative techniques such as brainstorming where problems are analyzed to give shared answers that are accepted by the whole organization.

5. Practical implication

5.1 the management of csr in telefónica.

In the CSR management systems in Telefónica, two issues are of particular interest for this survey, as they relate to the measurement of progress in the level of CSR obtained and because the relationship with the interest groups depends on the evaluation of the company: a) the interest that progressive accreditation has for society and the types of policies and actions envisaged for the gradual progress toward its objectives; and b) management systems about its stakeholders, with particular reference to suppliers and the introduction of CSR criteria.

5.2 The challenge of progressive accreditation

This section provides a general reflection on the impact that progressive accreditation has on Telefónica . The implementation of a gradual and progressive accreditation is highly appreciated by companies and organizations that have become spokespersons for the adoption of a management system based on CSR. It arises as a cumulative process, which makes it possible to maintain a medium-term objective, following an action plan to advance in the implementation of the subsequent phases. In many forums that have been created to promote strategies and actions, CSR highlights the need for elements of verification to ensure the truth of what organizations communicate and advertise. As CSR policies tend to produce greater value in a company’s intangible assets (such as brand and reputation), there is a need for effective enforcement and verification mechanisms that are accepted by the organizations represented. The gradual introduction of social responsibility management systems is seen to increase the very feasibility of CSR; the approach with progressive advancement is also valid for relations between interested parties. Although it is a challenge to accept that everything can be divided into distinct parts and that there is a way to advance through a series of distinct stages, it is plausible that each one involves difficulties and costs, such as in justifying the achievement of even partial goals. Those responsible for the implementation of CSR in companies are also interested in “partial recognition” as a clarifying tool, both for themselves and for senior management, that can facilitate their work and increase the probability of giving continuity to the strategic plan pursued. However, important issues to be outlined include the minimum coverage of each stage, the speed of implementation and the type of recognition possible, as well as the conditions for its use. In general, progressive-type solutions are suitable for collaboration strategies, with many interested parties, where each one offers a different contribution, and one crucial factor is the need to go slowly in gaining trust among the participants, while also considering the cost-benefit that everyone gains with the alliance. Furthermore, when the field of action is new or its scope unknown, caution is advised in the implementation of the progressive system. The basic alternatives for progressive implementations are I) partial scope, where the standard is subsequently applied to various parts of the organization [ 67 ]; and II) subsequent assumption of principles or requirements and assessment of the degree of conformity. These two basic progression options can be combined in mixed solutions. The two schemes were applied, respectively, for the ISO quality and environmental standardization systems (with subsequent partial certifications) and the excellent management systems (with initial self-assessment and external assessments, as in the case of EFQM 15 ). The partial field of application can be achieved according to various criteria: 1) structural differentiation of organizational units (departments, business units, subsidiaries of a group, work centers); 2) for the processes of the activities; and 3) for the interest groups involved. An easy way to measure progress is to list the tools and developments that are required for the implementation of the comprehensive, previously known, and accepted management system—for example, the policy approved by the board of directors, the creation of a body in the organizational structure that will be responsible for the process. Some evaluations include not only the results but also giving some evaluation of the performance predictions. This strengthens the systematic organizational commitment to progressive advancement, but it can be at risk of overestimation. This approach was applied in the “implementation and continuous improvement questionnaire” aimed at organizations that have formalized their adhesion to the Pacto Mundial in Spain. Some authors 16 also propose another dimension or point of evaluation of CSR strategies and policies: philosophies or attitudes adopted, generated between proactive and reactive. However, it has been observed that if it is claimed that this categorization measures the variables involved in degrees or levels, this can have difficulties and objective aspects that are difficult to evaluate and quantify. Following the “model for the gradual implementation of CSR” designed and implemented by Telefónica , we note that it has had a significant impact on the company’s operational strategy and has also served to promote both inside and outside the company’s social policy. It is not intended to convey a summary of the actions taken by the company at each stage, but only to highlight some facts that are considered representative and relevant for the analysis. The comments provided are general in scope and do not refer directly to the Telefónica company, but to all the research, and are a good example for observing design variables and problems to be overcome. The MIP model is like other systems designed for management and is a circular, feedback model, such as the PDCA 17 cycle, although it is adapted to the specific interests of the CSR system ( Table 6 ).

Phases of the Modelo de Implantación Progresiva (MIP) in Telefónica.

Source: Own processing based on Telefónica data.

Phase 1. To make this commitment public, the Informe Anual de Responsabilidad Corporativa 2003 begins with a letter from the president regarding the requirements of the GRI. In his message to the reader, he indicates that the vision of the company is aimed at being a “trusted operator” and that the only way to access this trust is to fulfill one’s commitments and maintain a position of proximity in understanding the needs and the expectations of customers, shareholders, employees, suppliers, or simply citizens. The CSR approach, to be effective, should be promoted as a value and a strategy that starts from the top management, through a plan to be implemented in all company activities. This push from top management must include the provision of necessary resources, how much they will have to compete with other objectives, and the correct priority among objectives for the allocation of resources. Therefore, the level within the organizational structure of the company and those responsible for each process are the important factors in resolving conflicts, but at the end, it will be the top management who will have to decide between the strategies if there are valid operational solutions. The formal organizational structure created for the management of CSR is often a sublevel of general management or corporate management in large companies, as indicated in the case of Telefónica . As for the informal structure, its proximity to the presidency and its mandate as the executor of a particular strategy, in practice, increase the level of enforceability. However, the level indicated refers only to the few companies that have bet heavily on CSR, as in many large and small businesses, the functions are shared. CSR managers are often told that their most challenging work begins with the work of internal conviction and in the rest of the structure in responsibility, personal commitment, and effort in resources. This difficulty is like that of the closest management systems such as the quality of the environment. The design of an incentive system for managers and employees is necessary so that they have a utility function consistent with the objectives of the company. However, the incentives can cause unexpected side effects, which can heavily affect the internal balance of the company or firm on the market. For example, stock options have been used to try to reduce the agency problem, which links executive remuneration to the value achieved through shares; however, they were also the cause of an increase in accounting fraud in the main listed companies in the late 1990s. These practices resulted in the loss of reputation of the company in which they were carried out and a significant loss of confidence in the market system 18 . It is this loss of confidence that is one of the main reasons why large companies are developing CSR strategies. Phase 2. Given the size and complexity of the company, the activities that the different business units carry out in the field of CSR are brought together, forming a sort of catalog. This collection made it possible to carry out, first, an analysis of the situation, the identification of evident absences, and the assignment of priorities to the initiatives. It also facilitated the identification of best practices, so that they could be exported to other units. The first consequence of this methodology is the internal benchmarking procedure, which is useful in large companies with different operating units and various geographical areas. Among the companies that were consulted in this research, it becomes clear that the initial diagnosis phase presents great difficulties, deriving mainly from the uncertainty of the very concept of CSR, from the presence of various definitions of CSR, relating to the inclusion or exclusion of principles, as well as the degree of participation of the interested parties. The managers of the company have different functions and are often of opposite opinions, and therefore, they are forced to choose one among them to create a common culture and conduct internal awareness campaigns. However, significant progress has been made to clarify the concepts and actions that need to be taken to implement a CSR system. The creation of economic value from the CSR strategy is based on certain requirements or expectations of its stakeholders to allow it to obtain a competitive advantage (Porter, 1985). These include a trust that the customer does not change supplier, proximity capable of decreasing the image of distance that a multinational can have; the issue of human rights compatible with the growing pressure of society against violations of privacy and abuse of a person; the image of efficiency and devotion of the company to reduce the advantage of competitors in the reference competitive sector; and the relationship with public institutions of the state. Phase 3. Based on this survey, the strategy was defined in Telefónica , assessed through the resources for implementation and the necessary organizational structure. It corresponds to the organizational structure to plan the methodology to be applied. If we compare the MIP model with the general management scheme, we see that planning and organization activities are included in the implementation phase. They have been concentrated; this does not mean the realization of a smaller number of phases, but an attenuation of the importance given to the other phases. Phase 4. The information systems that existed before 2002 in Telefónica provided only part of the information required by the new area of CSR, so it was necessary to create a specific information network. An “integrated management system” was launched in the field of CSR and it was necessary to work diligently to systematize the information, which was dispersed and uneven. To select the indicators, the guidelines of the Global Reporting Initiative were used together with the ratios and data pertinent to the specific activity; Telefónica itself participated in the development and organization of the GRI as well as in the creation of the reference guides for the telecommunication sector. To ensure the quality of the information, a determining factor has been identified: the accountability that provides information [ 70 ]. Furthermore, a double control was used, guaranteed, and made possible by the organizational structure of the company: the participation of the heads of each operational line or corporate center and the involvement of the company departments. CSR must be developed through a transversal management system that penetrates the various activities, integrated with other management systems. Therefore, the variables and results relating to CSR are combined in the management control systems of branches and business units [ 71 ]. For standardization, an internal regulation has been developed for carrying out CSR reports and the internal control department has participated in its elaboration. The control phase, which in general models, is usually identified as unique, and in Telefónica ’s CSR MIP, on the other hand, unfolds in three phases: measurement, communication, and verification. This approach is indicative of the importance that communication plays in the management of CSR since its development is correlated with interest groups. Based on the decision to consider verification as a separate phase, the argument supported by the various companies in the forums could be indicative: There is still little maturity in the field of CSR and it is necessary to proceed slowly and safely, identifying the groups of interest. It should be noted that the difficulty of obtaining homogeneous information on CSR in large companies motivates the choice to finalize the first stages of the implementation of the strategy in the creation of the information system. The same experience described for the telephone operator was compared among BBVA and other large companies. However, in PYMES 19 this part of the process would be much easier. The responsibility of the information generators is indicated in the sustainability report [ 72 ]. Indeed, one of the steps that have been considered most effective since the financial scandals of the 2000s is the clarification of personal responsibility in the information provided, which is institutionally promoted. The result measurement phase is closely linked to the principles of transparency and anti-corruption that accompanies CSR. Likewise, it is also essential in any management system for results and continuous improvement. The strategy and entrepreneurial activity can simultaneously influence relations with the various stakeholders. For example, if anticompetitive practices are used, reference is made to the interest group of competitors, the relationship with the public administration and customers, even if it is only a reflex moment. In many cases, it is not easy to determine where the commercial practice ends and those that are not accepted begin. Phase 5. The “Annual Report on Corporate Responsibility of Telefónica S.A.” was released in 2007, 2008, and 2009, and every year, there was a notable improvement in the contents and in the processing of information, as well as in its dissemination. Phase 6. Within the Telefónica MIP are the following steps in the verification process: internal audit on the correctness of the information; external audit; certifications; and verifications [ 73 ]. All the processes relating to the customers of Telefónica and Telefónica Moviles in Spain are certified according to the ISO 9001/2000 20 standard, and in Telefónica America Latina, they were carried out in 2004. Two characteristics can be observed in the design of these certifications: a) The development achieved is measured in proportion to the certified processes; and b) the priority of certification is assigned to the processes closest to the customer, who is the main beneficiary of quality. These continuous quality improvement plans include “service indicators” and “strategic quality indicators, with objectives of improvement and comparison with the quality perceived by the customer.” Six Sigma 21 is the reference methodology for process improvement and staff training. These systems include internal controls. In 1996, Telefónica of Spain acquired the environmental commitment of ETNO (European Telecommunications Operators), and in 1999, the development of an “environmental management project” takes the UNE EN ISO 14001 standard as a model. The environmental management system for Telefónica Moviles in Spain covers all its activities and is certified by AENOR by the UNE EN ISO 14001 standard. The various collective agreements of the company are applied to more than 100,000 employees of Telefónica . It is important to underline a way of expressing and communicating the ISO certifications that were used in the report produced by Telefónica . The reference to the percentage of processes subject to certification is clear information and should be standardized by quality managers (certifiers, consultants, and companies with quality systems). The 2000 edition of ISO 9001 provides for the focus of society as an integrated set of processes, and it is this vision of integration that should be strengthened. And this contrasts with the widespread practice among companies of citing the number of certificates earned (on quality, on the environment) as to their merit, without referring to what they represent for all processes in society. Thus, the reader could interpret a company, A, with four certificates as being in a better position than another company, B, with a single certificate, when the reality may be that company B has certified all its processes, and only some of these. Phase 7. The improvement phase is seen as the analysis of, and reflection on, the overall path and includes external recognition. This recognition can be evaluated in terms of awards obtained and by other means or methods that the market and institutions can design and use. Finally, in this phase of improvement, and through a DOFA 22 analysis, the diagnosis is fed, with which the next cycle begins, before continuing toward excellence. Telefónica has received many awards and recognitions for its commitment and its application to the principles of CSR. However, the field of international recognition of the progress achieved in social responsibility will never be complete without a common interpretation and evaluation of information by interest group representatives. There are at least four elements of variation, and they are difficult to interpret: the agent who subsidizes it; the means used for the assessment; the characteristics; and the degree of recognition granted. Concluding the discourse on the progressivity in the analysis of the Telefónica case and on the other elements observed, it is shown that the progressive advancement systems for the establishment and accreditation of the CSR are of a mixed nature, including progress in the unity of the organizational structure, in the processes, and in assessing compliance with the principles [ 74 ]. As a detail on the possible developments during the evaluation, the improvement in the quality and transparency of the communication is highlighted, which is to report the percentage covered by a certification process, rather than the number of certifications. Progress is also being made in the standardization, measurement, and accounting of the results achieved with CSR, particularly for the improvement and expansion of the reports made by the GRI [ 75 ], which with its guides since 2002 has started the elaboration of an articulated reporting on the sustainability [ 76 ]. However, it is still a process that requires a lot of development, especially in the use of measurements and in annual and cross-cutting improvement. It is internally validated that the reports are made according to the GRI guidelines, but they are not being carefully checked.

5.3 Focus on interest groups in Telefónica 23

Telefónica ’s approach to its stakeholders is to recognize legitimate interests and try to demonstrate their commitment and earn their trust. The following statement, which is exhaustive of the policy implemented by the Spanish group toward all its interlocutors, is reported on the company Web site on Telefónica ’s corporate responsibility: “A company of this size generates, every day, millions of contacts with groups that, directly or indirectly, maintain a legitimate interest in it: customers, shareholders, investors, employees, partners, media and suppliers. Furthermore, following these relationships, the Telefónica Group also maintains close contacts with all the companies and countries in which it operates. Each of these relationships is an opportunity to demonstrate Telefónica’s commitment to its interest groups … and therefore it is a chance, whether or not to win your trust.” 24 The previous quotation highlights a direct relationship with the six interest groups, while the reference to contacts with companies and the countries in which the company operates is presented because of relations with those groups. In the classification of Telefónica ’s interest groups, the following distinctive features must be noted: 1) special mention, to divide shareholders and investors even if it is considered the same interest group; 2) express reference to shareholders and consideration as an interest group; 3) governments (regulators) are excluded from the interest groups; 4) it includes the means of communication (mass media); and 5) no specific consideration of the “company” as an interest group but derivative of the relationships with the seven interest groups. Furthermore, they do not mention the concept of “company,” but a plural and diversified “company and countries in which it operates.” Telefónica has recognized, in its sustainability communication, suppliers as one of its stakeholders. The procurement process is a process that has standardized the Telefónica group, with standardization being carried out through the application of a “common management model,” already applied by 100 companies from the group, called the Sistema Avanzado de Compras (SAC). The SAC is a manual of conduct that states “the importance of intervening with rigour, objectivity, transparency and professionalism in the purchasing function, and which reflects the principles and guidelines that should guide actions with suppliers.” This manual is mandatory for all people involved in the procurement process, whether in commercial areas or working in different units. The manual includes 13 general principles, including those most directly connected with the principles of CSR, and the six approaches are as follows: I) customer satisfaction [ 77 ]; II) compliance with commitments; III) transparency in the procurement process; IV) equal opportunities for suppliers; V) objectivity in the decision-making process; and VI) contribution to the development of society. To strengthen the implementation of these principles, the manual underlines the “guidelines to be followed in situations deriving from the relationship with suppliers that can generate conflicts of interest” and indicates what to do in the working relationship with Telefónica suppliers and in other situations of constraint with a supplier, as well as the prohibition of accepting gifts or personal benefits associated with purchases ( Figure 4 ).

The Telefónica procurement process, CSR approach. Source: Own elaboration from Telefónica S.A. data.

The procurement process has five stages or phases, as shown in Figure 4 ; these phases are represented by their principal or actor, and in the same way, it is indicated in each phase how to proceed with the distinctive approach in CSR, resulting from the application of the six principles of the conduct manual (SAC). Telefónica has classified the acquisitions necessary to satisfy any type of need in five product lines (network infrastructures, services and works, products, market information systems, advertising, and marketing) in the definition of the requirements considering the global policy of sustainable development of society. Homogeneity is applied in requests for offers so that the information provided to suppliers (through the purchasing area) is the same for everyone to ensure equal opportunities for all interested groups. Another principle is contributing to the development of society, so the policy aims to promote the country’s economic activity, which influences purchases. The whole process up to the tender requires the supplier to be approved. The approval of suppliers is achieved by registering in the “supplier catalog,” which includes a presentation of the company and the opening of a register managed by the corresponding SAC process unit (there is at least one in each of the 19 countries in which Telefónica operates), to the verification process after inclusion in the catalog or to rejection. For the approval or rejection of the supplier, among other things, the criteria set out by the CSR are considered. Purchasing management is done through seven purchasing tables, which are in Madrid, São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Buenos Aires, Santiago de Chile, Lima, and Mexico City. Some products require technical approval before being used and therefore require a specific approval process. The specifications of the products/services being assessed include elements of social responsibility, such as those relating with respect to the environment. The negotiation phase is governed by a set of guidelines to ensure compliance with the supplier’s treatment, transparency, and objectivity; here are some guidelines for specific situations: a) Limit the requisites required for suppliers, without using the purchasing power of Telefónica because the supplier accepts abusive conditions well below the market; b) no offer will be negotiated without any possibility of awarding; c) confidentiality of information obtained from the supplier on offers and other aspects of the purchase tables; and d) there will be no meals or recreational activities during the negotiation period. The trading phase is carried out using the method of trading cycles or auctions. The management of the purchases of some product categories is carried out through an electronic commerce platform: e-Sourcing Adquira 25 , with over 4,300 affiliated providers. The ratio of products purchased by these means is not identical in the seven purchase tables and includes a series of items for each of the five product lines. This platform allows the management of bids and negotiation, as well as the implementation and management of purchase auctions. Transparency and objectivity are the principles of CSR that directly affect this phase. It must also ensure that the contract entered reflects what is negotiated with the supplier. In the final phase of contract implementation, the affected areas that they manage must strictly abide by the agreement and check that the supplier complies with its commitments. For the award, the calendar and the specifications of the offer will be considered. As the main aspect of the process analyzed in Telefónica , the principles of transparency and objectivity are preferred for the IT solutions that are transforming the company’s purchasing system. They point out that there is also an improvement in the efficiency of the system by reducing process costs, which affect both the supplier and the buyer. Telefónica is automating all purchasing processes in the value chain with the supplier. Together with the e-Sourcing, the e-Procurement company platform supports all internal procurement cycles (post-purchase), including the delivery of orders.

6. Communication on CSR in Telefónica : the annual reports on social responsibility

The first social report published in Spain was that of Banco Bilbao 26 in 1978, and this was followed by other large companies such as Telefónica , RENFE, 27 and Construcciones Aeronáuticas 28 . These relationships represent the aspect of social, not economic, indicators referring to customers, employees, the environment, and the community. However, this effort was soon stopped, due to the accentuation of a purely financial approach in the 1980s, which emphasized the relationship with investors, shareholders, and the media. The increase in CSR, as well as the importance within it of the information provided to interest groups, motivated Telefónica to decide to present the reports on corporate responsibility, for which it adopted the methodology of guidelines of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). Telefónica has also undertaken an attitude of active participation in the GRI, forming part of its Stakeholder Organization (SO) and being represented in its Stakeholder Council by its General Management of Reputation, Brand and Social Responsibility. Telefónica creates an integrated corporate responsibility report for the whole group, but it has also left certain freedom to the companies that want it to carry out their reports independently on sustainability; in fact, the following five companies appear in the list of Spanish companies in the GRI database: Telefónica S.A., Telefónica de España, Telefónica Móviles España , Telefónica Publicidad y Información, S.A. (TPI), and Telefónica Investigación y Desarrollo ( Telefónica I + D). The logic of this plurality of relationships is that companies have considered it as an element of competitive advantage relevant to their strategy in every sector. In other groups of companies (Ferrovial, BBVA, and Repsol YPF), this proliferation does not occur. The GRI database has a temporary delay concerning the publication of the reports on the Web site of each company; this may be due to the request of the GRI to grant the status of “in accordance” with the reports, which implies a review by this organization. Telefónica ’s reports are increasingly complete and sophisticated in trying to achieve the stated goal of more transparent information. Similarly, the effect of the improvements in the tool used is felt, following the publication of the 2008 edition of the GRI guidelines. El informe anual de responsabilidad corporativa 2008 29 by Telefónica begins with the president’s statement 30 and with a specific chapter for each interest group. The information is structured and standardized according to guidelines provided by the group and contains indicators both on the general commitment and on specific areas in the field of telecommunications. The list of indicators (referring to the 2008 report) is shown in its content in the following tables and graphs. In addition to the ratios, the company’s annual report includes the company profile, structure, governance [ 78 ], stakeholder engagement, and global policies. It should be noted that there are several indicators of social performance suitable for analyzing working conditions, respect for human rights, the relationship with society, and product responsibility because the company is very committed to this type of policy as also demonstrated by the annual report produced by the OSE 31 . Telefónica is a driving force for economic, technological, and social development in the countries where it operates. In 2008, the company generated more than 69,000 million euros in revenue. These revenues made it possible to pay 6,767 million euros to its employees (5% more than in 2007), 10,336 million euros to public administrations (4% more than in 2007), 32,832 million euros to its suppliers (2% more than in 2007), and approximately 6,700 million euros to its shareholders (22% more than in 2007). This is how society has distributed the wealth created. In 2008, Telefónica set aside more than 4,600 million euros for technological innovation, which represents a 6% increase compared with 2007. From this amount, 668 million euros were invested in research and development (R&D), meaning that Telefónica ranked sixth in the world in this category and first among Spanish companies, with an amount dedicated to investments that were four times than those of the runner-up in this ranking 32 . Significant progress in some areas of the group in the field of corporate responsibility and the need to improve implementation in others, together with the objectives set for 2011, constitute the reference target for 2009; this is the central message of the 2008 annual report by Telefónica . Here are the “milestones”: Corporate Responsibility and Business Principles . At the end of 2008, about 50% of the group’s employees (excluding Atento teleoperators) had received training in Business Principles , which represents 60,219, double the figure for 2007. The aim of promoting dialog with employees on business principles was achieved through the development of forms of internal communication such as publications (e.g., Somos magazine), and a variety of presentations in various locations and forums. Abdullah et al. [ 79 ] suggest that employees who value CSR campaigns and other practices identify with their company to a greater degree, work with more devotion and loyalty, and show more creativity in their work performance. Or better CSR practices have a significant influence on employee performance in terms of relationships between employee perception of CSR and employee outcome for firms [ 80 ]. Training initiatives were launched for employees in Ecuador, while CSR continued its consolidation process in the remaining countries where it had begun to be applied in 2007. Thematic panels were promoted in Peru on social inclusion in the sector of telecommunications, the Intégrame Project , and the 1st Forum on Antennas and Health. Telefónica O2 Germany 33 confirmed its status as the best company in relations within the group and the online dialog issue ( Figure 5 ).

Driving force of progress in Telefónica. Source: Annual Corporate Responsibility Report Telefónica S.A. 2008.

To encourage initiatives aimed at ensuring responsible behavior by interest groups and to help consolidate the companies and the good perception of Telefónica , the CSR guidelines have been developed for 10 countries, including the 2008 targets. Environment: An Environmental Management System has been developed for the entire group based on the ISO 14001 standard. A model that emphasizes the energy efficiency of equipment and products has also been implemented by suppliers in the work area of the OCC. Hang et al. [ 81 ] identified a significant and positive impact of CSR and green product innovation on organizational performance. Accordingly, green product innovation positively influences competitive advantage. Competitive advantage mediates the relationship between corporate social responsibility, green product innovation, and organizational performance. Measures aimed at improving energy efficiency, promoting the use of renewable energy and Green IT models, have been developed and implemented as part of the activities of the work area in the Climate Change Office 34 . The year 2008 marks the development of the Telefónica Environmental Performance Index (EPI) 35 based on a balanced scorecard 36 of environmental indicators. The rules that are expected to be implemented in 2009 and 2010 in all operations were designed in 2008 as part of the Global Environmental Management System 37 . These regulations cover aspects such as waste management, noise pollution control. Customers: Efforts invested in the Customer Experience 38 methodology that was introduced in 2007 resulted in an improvement in the Customer Satisfaction Index, bringing it up to 6.92% with an improvement of 2%. According to a pre-established work plan, in 2008, advice was distributed to customers and the public on the responsible use of technologies, with recommendations on safety, recycling, the use of technologies by children, intellectual property, and the use of technology in public places. The analyses include surveys involving approximately 85,000 children from 800 schools in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, and Venezuela; the conclusions were recorded in the White Book and will form the basis for the development of future educational initiatives. Ten principles that constitute the golden rules on advertising have been defined and are included in the Agencies Evaluation Model and are applied as part of the contractual conditions with these agencies. Employees : The ongoing initiatives have led to an improvement in the Employee Satisfaction and Commitment Index, bringing it up to 69%, three percentage points more than in 2007 and with participation in questionnaires equal to 70.4%. Progress has been made in dissemination and implementation tasks across the internal areas that will constitute the future Diversity Committee. The Telefónica Group work accident analysis procedure was developed to establish a set of common criteria to analyze the working conditions in all companies that belong to the Telefónica Group. Providers: Telefónica has more than met its 2008 target of assessing the risks of the value chain of 1,000 suppliers and carrying out 50 audits, reaching figures of 1,100 and 55, respectively. Community: Nearly 107,602 children were introduced to primary schools in 2008, doubling the previous year, in Latin America. The EducaRed 39 model was used to provide teachers, pupils, and families with the technological tools necessary to guarantee access to learning processes and teaching quality. Progress has been made in the following areas covered by the Accessible Telefónica Plan: accessibility of Telefónica mobile phones, ease of the integration process in the workplace, accessibility of procurement procedures, web accessibility, accessibility in stores, accessibility of digital TV, and accessibility of hardware. In addition to these results, communication actions and consolidation of the network of collaborations have been launched with other interested parties as well as constant support for innovation initiatives. At this point, it appears essential to analyze the strategic system of Telefónica ; corporate responsibility is considered an integral part of its objectives for the group and how it conducts its activities is based on doing business in the “right way.” Its initiatives are in the correct balance between positive and negative effects to prevent the adverse impacts affecting the value chain for each stakeholder. Telefónica ’s vision is to “improve people’s lives and business performance, as well as the advancement of the communication technologies in which it operates, offering innovative services based on information and communication technologies” (ICT). The objective of the strategy is to contribute to the sustainability of its business in the long term through the implementation of policies in favor of ethics and honesty, which in turn contributes to improving the satisfaction of customers, employees, shareholders, and, above all, the community, as summarized in the diagram below ( Figure 6 ).

Reference framework for the management of social impacts in Telefónica. Source: Adaptation from the Corporate Responsibility Report 2008, Telefónica S.A.

The philosophy of business excellence , that is, doing business in the “right way,” is the key principle of Telefónica ’s CR policy and underlies the whole context of its strategy. The company uses various indicators to measure its degree of implementation in these dynamics: in addition to the Customer Satisfaction Index , there is the Employee Satisfaction Index and the RepTrak ™ 40 , further highlighting the need to keep the focus on excellence, keeping the commitments made with customers. “Honesty and transparent management aimed at minimizing the negative impact of the value chain, through a commitment to ethics and honesty.” This represents the basic set of rules set out in the Business Principles , aimed at generating policies and regulatory frameworks necessary for the fulfillment of these objectives. The following graph better defines the role of corporate responsibility in the public and social aspects together with the economic and environmental impacts in a dynamic framework of variables. It must be emphasized that Telefónica tends to underline these objectives in its annual report precisely to highlight and guarantee its maximum transparency. Telefónica contributes to progress by maximizing the positive impact of its business and thus offering a contribution to improving the lives of people and other companies with which it enters a relationship. Educational programs for the use of ICT also have a positive impact on the environment and the productivity of businesses due to their ability to help reduce the consumption of natural resources and promote the fight against climate change. Social and cultural activities reinforce the impact of social action, allowing anyone, regardless of social position or cultural condition, to enjoy the benefits of progress. These activities are carried out through the Fundación Telefónica , ATAM 41 , the politics and sponsorships of Telefónica Europa, the Proniño project 42 , EducaRed, and other important initiatives such as Telefónica Voluntarios , Debate y Conocimiento , and Arte y Tecnología . Improving the benefits of CSR through initiatives of transparent communication and constructive dialog with stakeholders in Telefónica helps to define a guide and an economic, technological, and social progress force. The Spanish group publishes annual reports on CSR in 17 countries where it operates, which are compiled using the GRI standards, with 12 of these reports also being screened by the AA1000AS standards. In contrast, social and cultural action is evaluated with the LBG standards. To ensure that the initiative keeps pace with stakeholder expectations, an ongoing dialog with these interest groups is essential. The general objective is to move away from a mono-stakeholder strategy to implement a multi-stakeholder approach, which allows the company to develop a closer understanding of the interests of all these groups and to identify the most significant aspects and existing criticalities ( Figure 7 ).

Interrelations between public and private aspects with the economic prospectus. Source: Adaptation from the Corporate Responsibility Report 2008, Telefónica S.A.

7. Study limitation

Empirically [ 82 , 83 ], it was demonstrated that qualitative research helps entrepreneurs and small businesses understand what drives human behavior. It is also used to see how employees feel about workflows and tasks. However, qualitative research has many limitations that include possible small sample sizes [ 84 ], potential bias in answers [ 85 ], self-selection bias [ 86 ], and potentially poor questions from researchers [ 87 ]. It also can be artificial or unusual because in terms of it is not typical to observe participants in focus groups, ask them questions at work, or invite them to partake in this type of research method [ 88 ]. The significant limitations of this chapter’s contribution are associated with the study’s theoretical nature and the qualitative inquiry due to the unique case study analyzed [ 89 ].

8. Conclusions

Through this work, we have tried to bring some order to a subject characterized by a strong and constant evolution, in need of certain points of reference, from which to start for a better and more rigorous methodological definition. First, it emerged quite clearly how, at least in the medium to long term, the assumption in the field of social communication of a superficial, or even elusive, attitude toward the expectations of stakeholders can determine unfavorable consequences not only in terms of image but also from an economic/financial point of view, especially in large companies. Based on these considerations, it is necessary to ask what the most effective tools are for communicating the assumption of responsibility of the company. The ongoing debate on the methods and tools most suitable for representing and disseminating corporate responsibility in the social, environmental, and economic fields is going through a crucial phase. After a series of effective initiatives by public or private organizations, the impression is that among business representatives there is a real desire to collect the disjointed results produced so far in an organic project. At an international level, efforts are being made to re-organize the various standards and models developed in the context of economic, environmental, and social sustainability (the so-called “triple bottom line”). The broad process of involvement and consultation of stakeholders is fundamental, as they are the real arbiters of corporate success. Some of these initiatives (such as the AA 1000 of the ISEA or the “Guidelines” of the GRI) are characterized by an appreciable dynamic character, of a “work in progress” one could say, since “they do not foreshadow a final and definitive solution,” but rather involve a voluntary and continuous process of verification and review. This is more important the more one reflects on the problematic, and perhaps uncertain, the definition of the areas of responsibility of the company. The hope for the coming years is that principles and general criteria can be defined in a univocal or widely shared way, which can guide any organization, regardless of geographic location, size, and activity, in accounting processes, auditing, and reporting. If the various initiatives in progress converge into a single project, which integrates them efficiently, the dispersion of efforts and ideas on the subject, as happened in the past, could be avoided [ 90 ]. It is with this spirit that the study group for the establishment of the principles of drafting the social report (GBS) is working in Italy [ 91 ]. Founded in 1998, bringing together the main scholars and operators in the sector, the study group is still working to disseminate and improve social communication, based on certain principles and procedures for creating the social report [ 92 ]. The document presented in last May represents only the first step toward a more organic definition of the controversial subject under consideration. However, we can affirm that some critical problems in the field of social reporting have already been identified; these are the following aspects: a) poor standardization in content and subsequent difficulty in making inter-company and inter-temporal comparisons; b) poor reliability and credibility of social reporting tools; and c) difficulties for SMEs (small- and medium-sized enterprises) in adopting these tools due to the scarce economic convenience in drafting them. About the first point, the solution could be to start from a single aspect (e.g., through the creation of thematic balances), normalize their content by pursuing certain guidelines, and then progressively incorporate the other aspects, to arrive at a more complex and complete tool such as the social report [ 93 ]. In this process, the guidelines defined by the GBS and the GRI should be followed: In this way, companies would be stimulated and incentivized to adopt a single reporting model, while those that intend to depart from it would at least be required to explain their reasons. As regards the low credibility and reliability of corporate documents, which for a long time have been translated into simple “books of good intentions,” it is necessary to proceed in the direction of certification (auditing). Both are based on standards recognized by international organizations and by these certificates (HDE index, SA 8000, etc.), and by having external auditing firms certify the social financial statements. About the latter, an important role is played by the added value, which allows the social balance to be anchored to certain accounting data, as it derives from the financial statements. Finally, as regards the last point outlined above, it will be appropriate for SMEs to prepare a simple social report formed, for example, by the added value account and the surplus account; these are immediate processing that even the smallest company can conduct with very low costs since it simply requires a reprocessing of accounting data already collected. In conclusion, it is appropriate to clarify how the various social reporting tools and the social report serve not only to bring out the issues discussed so far in a public and transparent way but also to verify how they have been dealt with (through the comparison of subsequent documents) and what steps have been taken to resolve them. Specifically, it is necessary to encourage correct disclosure among companies of the principles and purposes of the social report, to avoid distortions in its interpretation [ 94 ]. It cannot be seen as a simple means of protecting or promoting the corporate image, but rather as an effective communication, management, and control tool that renders an effective service to the management of the company and its stakeholders. From these premises and other observations relating to the issues analyzed during this work such as CSR, sustainable development, and social ethics, Telefónica has built within it a “system of values,” based on a structure capable of fully merit understanding and responding to the new economic and environmental challenges of the international scene. The Telefónica case, therefore, represents a successful example of the integration of commercial, social, and environmental policies that find their strategic position within the group. This does not create critical issues but becomes the basis for building the “new competitive proposal,” where natural and energy resources tend to run out inexorably; in the not-so-distant future, the only way to be able to compete will be in social and environmental performance.

Acknowledgments

This work is based on research carried out in the Basque Country during a 6-month Erasmus study period abroad. The research was the subject of the master’s degree final thesis in the Business Economics course of the Federico II University of Naples. I thank the University of the Basque Country and my Italian tutor of Federico II University of Naples, Professor Riccardo Viganò, for the opportunity. I also thank the company Telefónica S.A. for the valuable interviews and company materials provided for the drafting of the chapter.

Conflicts of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

www.bbva.es

www.bilanciosociale.it

www.bilanciosociale.com

www.bitc.org.uk

www.bvqina.com

www.csreurope.org

www.educared.net

www.ethics.org

www.ethicscan.on.ca

www.ethicsinaction.com

www.foretica.es

www.fundacion.telefonica.com

www.globalreporting.org

www.hdr.undp.org

www.kld.com

www.iso.org

www.obrsc.org

www.orsadata.it

www.sa8000.info

www.sa-intl.org

www.sustainability-index.com

www.telefonica.es

www.tt.mtin.es

www.smaer.it

• 1. Renzo A. La Corporate social responsability e il ruolo del bilancio sociale. 2016
• 2. Barbé S. Uno: missione e valori guida. In: Fuori Orario 18 e 19. 1999
• 3. Bonal J, Jacquet JL, Vermay A, Hemmer E, Kuller HD, Bonal J, et al. Responsabilità sociale e bilancio sociale d’impresa: Esperienze e prospettive negli Stati Uniti e in Europa. Franco Angeli; 1981
• 4. Mio C, Concini C. Il budget ambientale: Programmazione e controllo della variabile ambientale. Egea; 2001
• 5. Bertini U. Il sistema d’azienda (The enterprise as a System). Torino: Giappichelli; 1990
• 6. Basile V, Capobianco N, Vona R. The usefulness of sustainable business models: Analysis from oil and gas industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2021; 28 (6):1801-1821
• 7. Sacconi L. Guida critica alla responsabilità sociale e al governo d’impresa: problemi, teorie e applicazioni della CSR. Bancaria; 2005
• 8. Panati G, Golinelli G. Tecnica economica industriale e commerciale: Imprese, strategie e management. Nuova Italia Scientifica; 1988
• 9. Sacco PL, Viviani M. La responsabilità sociale d’impresa: Prospettive teoriche nel dibattito italiano. Economia politica. 2008; 25 (2):317-350
• 10. Sarfraz M, Qun W, Abdullah MI, Alvi AT. Employees’ perception of corporate social responsibility impact on employee outcomes: Mediating role of organizational justice for small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Sustainability. 2018a; 10 (7):2429
• 11. Catturi G. Lezioni di economia aziendale. Cedam; 1984
• 12. Bartolomeo M. La contabilità ambientale d’impresa. Il Mulino, Bologna; 1997
• 13. Terzani S. Responsabilità sociale dell’azienda. Rivista Italiana di Ragioneria e di Economia aziendale. 1984; 8 :286-299
• 14. Blackorby C, Bossert W, Donaldson D. Utilitarianism and the theory of justice. Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare. 2002; 1 :543-596
• 15. Harsanyi JC. Bayesian decision theory and utilitarian ethics. The American Economic Review. 1978; 68 (2):223-228
• 16. Quinton A. Utilitarian ethics. Springer; 1973
• 17. Amartya S. Etica ed economia. Roma: Editori Laterza; 1988
• 18. Marchesini GC, Zamagni S. L’impresa etica e le sue sfide: Interventi, interviste, casi. Egea; 2003
• 19. Coda V. Etica ed impresa: Il valore dello sviluppo. Rivista dei Dottori Commercialisti. 1996:792
• 20. Di Toro P. L’etica nella gestione d’impresa. Cedam; 1993
• 21. Battini F. Riflessioni su etica, economia e finanza: con un saggio introduttivo di Donato Masciandaro Mucchi; 2000
• 22. Onida P. Economicita’, socialita’ed efficienza nell’amministrazione d’impresa. Casa ed. della Rivista italiana di ragioneria; 1961
• 23. Vermiglio F. Il bilancio sociale nel quadro evolutivo del sistema d’impresa. Messina: Grapho Editor; 1984
• 24. Zamagni S. L’economia del bene comune. Città nuova; 2007: 3
• 25. Argandoña A. Sobre los sistemas de gestión ética social y medioambiental en las empresas. Revista papeles de ética, economía y dirección. 2003; 8 :90-114
• 26. Matacena A. Impresa ed ambiente: il bilancio sociale. Bologna: Clueb; 1984
• 27. Molteni M. Responsabilità sociale e performance d’impresa. Per una sintesi socio-competitiva. Vita e pensiero; 2004
• 28. Matacena A. Responsabilità sociale e informativa sociale, in Stato dell’arte e dell’innovazione, Milano 8/9 giugno 1999
• 29. Gabrovec Mei O. Il valore aggiunto delle imprese: Schemi di calcolo applicati alle Principali societa’ italiane, In: Amministrazione e Finanza n. 7; 1993
• 30. Rappaport A. Creating Shareholder Value: The new standard for business performance. Free Press; 1986
• 31. Pestoff V. Rendiconto sociale per cooperative e organizzazioni non profit. Impresa Sociale. 1996; 28
• 32. Chiesi A, Martinelli A, Pellegatta M. Il bilancio sociale, Stakeholder e responsabilità sociale d’impresa, Il sole 24Ore. 2000
• 33. Airoldi G, Brunetti G, Coda V. Corso di economia aziendale. Il Mulino; 2020
• 34. Wood DJ, Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Bryan LM. Stakeholder identification and salience after 20 years: Progress, problems, and prospects. Business & Society. 2021; 60 (1):196-245
• 35. Baxter P, Jack S. Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report. 2008; 13 (4):544-559
• 36. Yin RK. Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Applied Social Research Methods). London and Singapore: Sage; 2009
• 37. Meyer B. Case studies. In: researching translation and interpreting. Routledge; 2015. pp. 195-202
• 38. Fowler MD. Ethical issues in nursing research: Issues in qualitative research. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 1988; 10 (1):109-110
• 39. Groves RM. Survey errors and survey costs. John Wiley & Sons; 2005
• 40. Guion LA, Diehl DC, McDonald D. Conducting an In-depth Interview. McCarty Hall, FL: University of Florida; 2001. pp. 1-3
• 41. Yin RK. Designing case studies. Qualitative Research Methods. 2003; 5 (14):359-386
• 42. Johnston MP. Secondary data analysis: A method of which the time has come. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries. 2017; 3 (3):619-626
• 43. Hox JJ, Boeije HR. Data collection, primary versus secondary. 2005
• 44. Devine P. Secondary data analysis. The AZ of Social Research. 2003
• 45. Legard R, Keegan J, Ward K. In-depth interviews. Qualitative Research Practice. 2003; 6 (1):138-169
• 46. Bandettini A. Contabilità sociale dell’azienda e bilancio sociale. Scritti in onore di Pietro Onida. Vol. 1983. Milano: Giuffrè; 1983
• 47. Vermiglio F. Il cantiere aperto del bilancio sociale. Rivista della cooperazione, (1/2). 2000
• 48. Klassen AC, Creswell J, Plano Clark VL, Smith KC, Meissner HI. Best practices in mixed methods for quality of life research. Quality of Life Research. 2012; 21 (3):377-380
• 49. Delgado JB. La ética y la comunicación en el ámbito global de las organizaciones. In: Reflexiones sobre la responsabilidad social, la empresa y el tercer sector: Memoria académica curso 2003-2004. Universidad Pontificia Comillas; 2005. pp. 17-52
• 50. Viganò R. Il valore dell’azienda: Analisi storica e obiettivi di determinazione. Cedam; 2001
• 51. Argentaria, BBVA. Informe anual de responsabilidad social corporativa. 2002
• 52. Bruni G. Il bilancio di missione delle aziende non profit. Rivista italiana di ragioneria e di economia aziendale. 1997; 97 (5/6):234-244
• 53. Benavides Delgado J, Fernández JL. Reflexiones sobre la responsabilidad social, la empresa y el tercer sector . 2005
• 54. Cavalieri E. Aspetti sociali dell’informazione economica d’impresa. 1981
• 55. Trujillo E. Modelo de Gestión de Responsabilidad Corporativa, V Conferenza Interamericana sulla Corporate Social Responsabilty, Telefónica S.A., 2007
• 56. Sciarelli S. Etica e responsabilità sociale nell’impresa. Giuffrè Editore; 2007
• 57. Sicca L. La gestione strategica dell’impresa: concetti e strumenti. Cedam; 2001
• 58. Horovitz J. La calidad del servicio: A la conquista del cliente. In: La calidad del servicio: A la conquista del cliente. 1991:105-105
• 59. Bryant B, Fornell C. American Customer Satisfaction Index, Methodology Report; 2005
• 60. Preston LE. Corporation and society: The search for a paradigm. Journal of economic literature. 1975:434-453
• 61. Cassandro PE. Sulla cosiddetta performance dell’azienda e sulle possibilità di una sua valutazione. Rivista Italiana di Ragioneria. 1985:4-5
• 62. Andreu R. Una herramienta de competitividad para el futuro, Cuadernos de comunicación e innovación, Revistas Politica y Culturales Número 79 Abril / Junio 2009
• 63. Navas JE, Guerras M. La Dirección Estratégica de la Empresa: Teoría y Aplicaciones, Civitas Ediciones, S.L., 1998
• 64. Fiol CM, Lyles MA. Organizational learning. Academy of management review. 1985; 10 (4):803-813
• 65. Pistoni AI, Songini L. Misurare e comunicare la Corporate Social Responsibility; 2005
• 66. Ajaz A, Shenbei Z, Sarfraz M. Delineating the influence of boardroom gender diversity on corporate social responsibility, financial performance, and reputation. LogForum. 2020; 16 (1)
• 67. Franceschetti JM, Gramigna S. Verso uno standard per la certificazione sociale: La SA 8000; 2002
• 68. Carroll. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review Chap. 1979; 4 :497-505
• 69. Joyner, Payne. Building values, business ethics and corporate social responsibility into the developing organization. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship. 2002; 7 :113-131
• 70. Zadek S, Evans R, Pruzan P. Building corporate accountability: Emerging practice in social and ethical accounting and auditing. Routledge; 2013
• 71. Clavero AMC. La responsabilidad de la empresa en el contexto social: Su articulación gestión y control [Doctoral dissertation]. Universidad de Málaga; 1986
• 72. Tettamanzi P, Minutiello P. ESG: Bilancio di sostenibilita’e integrated reporting. IPSOA; 2022
• 73. Lepore G, D’Alesio M. La certificazione etica d’impresa. La norma SA 8000 ed il quadro legislativo. Informa Health Care. 2004: 560
• 74. Gandini G. Gennari, F, di Economia Aziendale, R. Funzione di compliance e responsabilità di governance; 2008
• 75. Simonazzi R. Il bilancio e la contabilità ambientale. Halley editrice, Roma; 2004
• 76. Vermiglio F. Nuovi strumenti di comunicazione aziendale. Confronto di esperienze in tema di bilancio sociale. 2000
• 77. Busacca B. Le risorse di fiducia dell’impresa: soddisfazione del cliente, creazione del valore strategie di accrescimento. Torino: Utet; 1994
• 78. Spitzeck H. The Governance of Corporate Responsibility: A ‘How to’Guide. 2010
• 79. Abdullah MI, Ashraf S, Sarfraz M. The organizational identification perspective of CSR on creative performance: The moderating role of creative self-efficacy. Sustainability. 2017; 9 (11):2125
• 80. Sarfraz M, Qun W, Hui L, Abdullah MI. Environmental risk management strategies and the moderating role of corporate social responsibility in project financing decisions. Sustainability. 2018b; 10 (8):2771
• 81. Hang Y, Sarfraz M, Khalid R, Ozturk I, Tariq J. Does corporate social responsibility and green product innovation boost organizational performance? a moderated mediation model of competitive advantage and green trust. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. 2022:1-21
• 82. Dana LP, Dana TE. Expanding the scope of methodologies used in entrepreneurship research. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business. 2005; 2 (1):79-88
• 83. Neergaard H, Ulhøi JP. Handbook of qualitative research methods in entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2007
• 84. Boddy CR. The sample size for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal. 2016
• 85. Chenail RJ. Interviewing the investigator: Strategies for addressing instrumentation and researcher bias concerns in qualitative research. Qualitative Report. 2011; 16 (1):255-262
• 86. Norris N. Error, bias and validity in qualitative research. Educational Action Research. 1997; 5 (1):172-176
• 87. Palaganas EC, Sanchez MC, Molintas VP, Caricativo RD. Reflexivity in qualitative research: A journey of learning. Qualitative Report. 2017; 22 (2)
• 88. Morgan DL, Spanish MT. Focus groups: A new tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology. 1984; 7 (3):253-270
• 89. Ritchie J, Lewis J, Nicholls CM, Ormston R editors. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Sage; 2013
• 90. Puddu L. Gli strumenti contabili tradizionali e le decisioni. In: Aa VV., Strumenti informativo-contabili per le decisioni aziendali. AIDEA, Clueb: Bologna; 1988
• 91. De Santis G, Ventrella AM, Tozzi S. Il bilancio sociale dell’impresa. Franco Angeli; 1980
• 92. Rusconi G. D’IMPRESA, I. B. S. PROBLEMI E PROSPETTIVE. Giuffrè, Milano; 1988
• 93. Pulejo L. Esperienze in tema di bilancio sociale Il modello francese. Giappichelli; 1996
• 94. Rusconi G. Il ruolo del bilancio sociale nel contesto dell’economia aziendale. Rivista Italiana di Ragioneria e di Economia Aziendale. 1987
• The Green Paper is communication with which the European Commission illustrates the state of a particular sector to be regulated and clarifies its point of view regarding certain problems; it is part of the so-called "atypical acts" envisaged but not governed by the EEC Treaty, and this type of communication can have an informative, decision making, declarative, or interpretative nature, and is subject to the advertising regime.
• Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (BBVA) is a Spanish multinational banking group with a strong regional origin (Basque Country). Its origin dates to the merger of Banco Bilbao Vizcaya and Argentaria in 1999, which led to the creation of the second-largest Spanish bank, behind Banco Santander Central Hispano. It is the 10th European bank by capitalization with 64.6 billion capitalizations and is highly sensitive to issues of social responsibility and environmental sustainability, and in fact, according to the President of the BBVA Foundation Francisco Gonzàles Rodrìguez, as well as the Guggenheim and Fine Arts Museum of Bilbao: "There can be no sustainable development without a sustainable financial system."
• AENOR is a private, independent, and non-profit Spanish organization recognized nationally, in Europe, and internationally that contributes to the improvement of quality in companies, their products and services and to the protection of the environment, and, consequently, to the well-being of the company, through the development of standardization and certification of company activities.
• Telefónica I + D is the innovation company of the Telefónica Group. Over the past few years, Telefónica I + D has grown within the global market to become a network of centers of technological excellence that extends far beyond the Spanish borders, starting its R&D activity up in its offices located in Barcelona, Granada, Huesca, Madrid, Valladolid, São Paulo, and Mexico. In addition to the numerous technical awards, it has won since its founding, the company received the Príncipe Felipe for Business Excellence Award in 2002.
• Graduated in Law from the Pontifical University of Comillas, he was an MBA from the Instituto de Empresa and at this School of Business he began his career in the research department and went on to become Associate Professor of Organization of Behavior and Communication. He is a member of the Committee of CSR experts of the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs, of the Spanish Commission of the United Nations Global Compact, of the Patronage of the Chair of Ethics Javier Benjumea of ICADE, on the boards of directors of the Institute of Analysis of Intangibles and the Spanish Forum for the Main Brands.
• Esther Trujillo is the Head of Territory Development of the Sol Meliá hotel chain but has developed much of her career in the Telefónica Group, where she has worked for the past 12 years, mainly in the network management and institutional participation in social responsibility initiatives and sustainable development. She has edited for the Spanish telephone group the annual reports on the management model of the RSC and the complications in its application in the value chain.
• Comité Técnico de Normalización 50 AENOR-CTN50 Documentación; the main functions of the committee (in the abbreviation AEN / CTN50) are the development and updating of the documentation related to UNE-EN ISO 9001 (the brand used to indicate the certifications issued by AENOR), as well as monitoring the reports on the work of technical committees on quality and safety, proposing opinions and comments through technical documents and nomination experts and national delegates participating in international meetings.
• Ethical commitment initiative, intended for companies in all countries of the world that adopt the 10 principles of behavior and respect for human, labor, and environmental rights as an integral part of their strategy and conduct and are working to fight corruption. The idea of a United Nations Global Compact in the field of corporate social responsibility was launched by UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan at the World Economic Forum in Davos on January 31, 1999. In recent years, platforms and local networks in many countries of the world the principles on which the organization is based have been acknowledged and shared by all institutional and corporate members as well as by civil society [60].
• An organization that strives for the global economy as a force for economic growth, job creation, and prosperity. Because national economies are so closely intertwined today, government decisions are much stronger internationally than in the past. The ICC as the only global contact states that it is more determined to express opinions on the businesses in progress. Its activities cover a broad spectrum of functions, from arbitration to dispute resolution, to promote free trade and make the market economy system transparent: from self-regulation to the fight against corruption and commercial crime. The ICC has direct access to national governments around the world through its national and international committees and is based in Paris.
• Ministry of Labour and Immigration (Ministerio de Trabajo y Inmigración de España).
• The specific interests of small- and medium-sized enterprises are represented by the Spanish Confederation of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises, a national organization and member of the CEOE. An organization for progress, the CEOE continuously analyzes the socioeconomic activities of Spain, in order to improve and propose the best competitive solutions for companies. The CEOE is active internationally through the presence of offices in different parts of the world. Another sector activity of the CEOE is that of protecting the artistic heritage and what it represents as well as the interest in the research and development of a country.
• In the Spanish government, the Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales is managed by the Undersecretary of Labour and Social Affairs of the Ministry of Labour and Immigration, established by royal decree on May 8, 1920.
• The FTSE Group (FTSE) is a world leader in the creation and management of more than 120,000 stocks, bonds, and alternative asset class indices. With offices in London, Frankfurt, Hong Kong, Beijing, Boston, Shanghai, Madrid, Paris, New York, San Francisco, Sydney, and Tokyo, the FTSE Group works with partners and clients in 77 countries around the world. FTSE is an independent company jointly controlled by the Financial Times and the London Stock Exchange. These FTSE indices are widely used by a variety of investors, such as advisors, asset owners, fund managers, investment banks, exchanges, and brokers. The indices are used for the purposes of investment analysis, performance measurement, an asset at the location, risk-hedging profiles, and the creation of fund monitoring indices.
• For further study, the Talleres de Reputación Corporativa held by Telefónica S.A. can be considered, periodically, the workshop of the Conferencia Interamericana de RSC de la Empresa held in Panama on October 28, 2003, on Reputación y Responsabilidad Social Corporativas.
• The foundation aims to promote a reference model in order to improve company performance through a more extensive and articulated overall approach than the classic ISO 9000 models. In the EFQM model, the company is analyzed based on many elements, which are then grouped into nine main criteria, each with its own weight. The grade obtained with respect to each criterion then contributes, based on the weight envisaged by the model, to the final evaluation of the company.
• In this regard, it is possible to consult the publications on the subject produced by important corporate responsibility scholars Carroll [68] and Joyner and Payne [69].
• It serves to promote a culture of quality that is aimed at the continuous improvement of processes and the optimal use of resources. This tool starts from the assumption that in order to achieve the highest quality, constant interaction between research, design, testing, production, and sales is necessary. To improve quality and satisfy the customer, the four phases must constantly rotate, with quality as the main criterion. Edwards Deming in Japan in the 1950s. In those years in Japan, quality production was ensured simply by the testing phases. Post-process inspections only made it possible to discard the defective parts and, following this logic, the increase in quality would have meant an increase in inspections and consequently in costs. Waste and costs were not in tune with the concept of quality sought by Japan. Edwards Deming, to introduce tools to ensure a progressive improvement in quality. The Japanese subsequently reinvented the Deming wheel and called it the PDCA Cycle, constituting a method to be applied to all phases and situations. Now, the concept of constantly spinning the Deming wheel to generate continuous improvement is extended to all phases of management, and the four stages of the wheel correspond to specific activities.
• For an in-depth analysis, see the paper "Determinants of collateral" in which the authors conduct an extensive examination of the effects of information asymmetries and of the relationships of the financial and banking market in the various economic cycles: GABRIEL JIMENEZ (Banco de España), VICENTE SALAS (Universidad de Zaragoza and Banco de España), and JESUS SAURINA (Banco de España), February 2004.
• Acronym corresponding to the Italian PMI (small and medium enterprises), PyMEs (pequeñas y medianas empresas).
• The standard that specifies the requirements for a quality management system in which an organization must demonstrate its ability to consistently supply products that satisfy the customer and the applicable regulatory requirements, aiming to increase customer satisfaction through the effective application of this system, including processes for continuous improvement and customer compliance assurance. All requirements of this international standard are generic and are intended to be applicable to all organizations, regardless of the type, size, and product supplied.
• This denomination indicates a quality management program based on the control of the mean square deviation, which aims to bring the quality of a product or service to a certain level that is particularly favorable for the consumer. This variability is so limited that initially the common opinion was that it was impossible to achieve, and many believed that a three-sigma strategy might be acceptable. This guarantees a direct impact on the customer, intended as a user of the process or product.
• The analysis can concern the internal or external environment of an organization. The usefulness of SWOT analysis is not limited to organizations for profit. SWOT analysis can be used in any decision-making process where the desired end state has been defined.
• With this expression, Telefónica wants to include all the subjects and interested parties who meet the company; this expression could also be translated with the common term of Anglo-Saxon derivation "stakeholder."
• The text is taken from the Telefónica Web site in the specific section dedicated to RC and sustainability 2009 (www.telefonica.com/es).
• Adquira is the leading trading and provisioning solutions company in Spain, striving to facilitate business relations between businesses through an integrated e-commerce platform. Its mission is to enable companies to take part in e-commerce, meeting their procurement needs, allowing them to do business with significant competitive advantages and offer reliable solutions. Adquira began operating in 2000 as an initiative of four of the largest companies in Spain: BBVA, Telefónica, Iberia, and Repsol YPF; the company has a very full database of more than 4,500 suppliers in Spain, in order to improve the purchasing processes of its customers. Its activity, with almost 10 years of experience in the market, allows it to offer specialization, experience, and guarantee of service.
• Bank founded in Bilbao in 1857 that gave rise (through subsequent mergers) to the current BBVA group (Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.).
• The Red Nacional de Los Ferrocarriles Españoles is a Spanish state structure of railway transport founded in 1941 and in force until 2004–2005, which was divided into ADIF (Spanish railway infrastructure management body) and Renfe Operadora (the company that deals with the railway service).
• The Empresa Construcciones Aeronáuticas S.A. (CASA) created by José Ortiz Echagüe on March 3, 1923, was the first Spanish company in the aerospace sector.
• Telefónica presents in this annual report on corporate responsibility its behavior toward customers, employees, shareholders, suppliers, society, and the environment. The content is part of the company’s CSR strategy and includes information on Telefónica’s achievements in this area, its objectives, and challenges for the future.
• Cesar Alierta Izuel graduated in Law from the University of Zaragoza in 1967 and after 3 years earned a master’s in business administration from Columbia University in New York, United States. Executive President of Telefónica S.A. since July 26, 2000, he has contributed significantly to the growing development of the Spanish telephone group in recent years.
• The Observatorio de la Sostenibilidad en España is an independent project in operation since February 2005, based at the University of Alcalá, and starts its activities following an agreement signed with the Ministry of the Environment, the Foundation for Biodiversity, and the General Foundation of the University of Alcalá.
• The 2008 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard.
• Telefónica O2 Germany GmbH & Co. The company offers its German private and commercial customers fixed and mobile telephone services with prepaid contracts, as well as innovative mobile telephone and data transmission services based on GPRS and UMTS technologies, thus becoming an integrated high-speed communication provider, the leader in Germany by market share. In it, the communications company provides information on key performance indicators for 2009 and its commitment to customers, employees, and the community, as well as its CSR goals for 2010.
• The Office of Climate Change was established in September 2006 in the UK to help and support the analysis work on climate change and the development of policies and strategies for the future. The organization’s goal is to reduce the environmental impact deriving from "hardly responsible" choices by companies and to promote and raise public awareness of issues of great interest today, such as human health and sustainability.
• The EPI aims to give the company a more accurate picture of the state of environmental progress, for each company, by providing reliable quantitative information; the index will help evaluate the measures taken so far and facilitate decision making for the future. These indicators reflect characteristics such as environmental objectives, ongoing legal proceedings, and employee training.
• For an extensive discussion of the BSC as an "integrated dashboard of indicators" see Vigano, "The value of the company. Historical analysis and determination objectives" 2001, chap. 3, pp. 93–101.
• In 2008, the company designed an Environmental Management System in accordance with the international standard ISO 14001 to set environmental management guidelines for all group companies. The documents that make up the Environmental Management System worldwide are the environmental policy, the Basic Standard, nine specific environmental management standards, and the Environmental Sustainability Index.
• The CSI is an "average" synthetic indicator, built based on the assessments given by customers on the individual aspects that put the customer in a relationship with Telefónica and on the level of importance that the individual aspects have for each customer. For a careful analysis of the index, see Bryant and Fornell, "American Customer Satisfaction Index, Methodology Report," April 2005.
• This program, sponsored by the Fundación Telefónica, aims to encourage the use of the Internet as a tool for innovation and pedagogical training for teachers, parents, and students of primary, secondary, high school, and intermediate training cycles. To do this, for 10 years, it has operated through a dedicated portal signed by more than 12,000 Spanish centers and holds an international congress every 2 years with an influx of thousands of teachers.
• The tool is used by the Reputation Institute to measure the reputation among stakeholders, interested countries, and industry. The Reputation Institute is involved in an ongoing effort to measure and monitor the corporate reputation of companies around the world. The Global Pulse project measures the overall reputation of the world’s largest companies by capturing consumer data in 27 countries using the core of the RepTrak™ model. In 2006, the RI did a multicenter, national study to understand how reputation had evolved over the previous decade.
• State non-profit association, declared to be of public utility, with the agreement of the Council of Ministers, adopted at the meeting of 09/12/1977. Its purpose is to coordinate and support disability prevention efforts and protect the rights of disabled people by providing resources whose primary objective is the social integration of people with disabilities. It focuses its activity based on the following approach: "... to be the first prestigious reference in the world on disability, as an institution that provides complete assistance for people with disabilities, to offer our beneficiaries a personalized, professional, efficient continuous and fully satisfactory, throughout their life path."
• The social action program of the Telefónica Group, managed by its Foundation with the mobile phone operators of 13 Latin American countries, contributes significantly to eradicating child labor in the region. The program is aligned with the regional objectives of the Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OCT), seeking to eliminate the worst forms of child labor by 2015, and all child labor by 2020.

© 2022 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Continue reading from the same book

Published: 03 May 2023

By Adane Mengist

88 downloads

By Isaac Onyeyirichukwu Chukwuma and Uzoma Ogochukwu ...

101 downloads

By Maha Elkateb, Ouidad Yousfi and Abdelwahed Omri

155 downloads

TATA Steel India: Corporate Social Responsibility Case Study Project

• First Online: 04 December 2021

Cite this chapter

• Kamal Singh 4 &
• Tamanna Girdhar 4  

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

433 Accesses

This case study project examines the various CSR interventions and initiatives of TATA Steel India and analyses their impact on the society and on different stakeholders. The paper defines and draws meaningful conclusions about a corporate’s responsibility towards society and how they have a major role to play in sustainable development. Previous research on CSR and India’s CSR Policy formed the stepping stone for the analysis and future scope of this project. The main aim of the project is to provide a detailed understanding of CSR by providing fruitful insights about the CSR policy and interventions of TATA Steel India.

Author Note: This chapter is an outcome of a Best Case Study Innovative Practices conducted by Global Compact India Network in 2019. Content has been used with permission from relevant authorities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Brown, K. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: Perceptions of Indian Business. In M. Mehra (Ed.). Retrieved from www.csmworld.org/public/pdf/social_respons.Pdf .

Banerjee, P. K. (2003). Corporate governance & business ethics in the 21st century. ICFAI Journal of Corporate Governance, III (2).

Google Scholar  

Chakrabarty, B. (2013). Corporate social responsibility: Implications for small and medium enterprises in developing countries. Report was prepared by Peter Raynard and Maya Forstater in cooperation with staff of UNIDO’s Small and Medium Enterprises Branch, 2002.

Grzyb, H. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility starts at home: Comparisons of metropolitan and rural SMEs in Western Australia. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 12 (1), 88–109.

Hamidu, A., Haron, H., & Amran, A. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: A review on definitions, core characteristics and theoretical perspectives. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6 , 83–95. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4p83

Article   Google Scholar  

Höllerer, M. (2012). Corporate social responsibility (CSR). In Between creed, rhetoric façade, and disregard: dissemination and theorization of corporate social responsibility in Austria (pp. 29–66). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang AG. Retrieved August 20, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv9hj7c3.7 .

Jenkins, H. (2006). Small business champions for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics , no. 67, 241–256.

Lepourte, J., & Heene, A. (2006). Investigating the impact of firm size on small business social responsibility: A critical review. Journal of Business Ethics , no.67, 257–273.

Rahman, H., & Singh, R. (2019). An overview of CSR taken by TATA Group.

Web Resources

https://www.tatasteel.com/media/12381/tata-steel-ir.pdf .

https://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/pdf/CSRHLC_13092019.pdf .

http://35.154.196.254/investors/annual-report-2015-16/html/corporate-social-responsibility-activities.html .

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

UN Global Compact Network India, New Delhi, India

Kamal Singh & Tamanna Girdhar

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamanna Girdhar .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Indian Institute of Plantation Management, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Ananda Das Gupta

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Singh, K., Girdhar, T. (2022). TATA Steel India: Corporate Social Responsibility Case Study Project. In: Das Gupta, A. (eds) A Casebook of Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5719-1_6

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5719-1_6

Published : 04 December 2021

Publisher Name : Springer, Singapore

Print ISBN : 978-981-16-5718-4

Online ISBN : 978-981-16-5719-1

eBook Packages : Religion and Philosophy Philosophy and Religion (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research